Comments by "" (@PerceivedREALITY999) on "NYT spins very tall tale. Finland inches closer to NATO. France in trouble in Mariupol. Update 2" video.

  1. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    386
  2. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    76
  3. There should be a comprehensive and impartial international investigation. Each dead body needs to be subjected to a forensic investigation (time of death, mechanism of death and determine if the body has been tampered with). Why did the UK veto Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry?
    39
  4. There should be a comprehensive and impartial international investigation. Each dead body needs to be subjected to a forensic investigation (time of death, mechanism of death and determine if the body has been tampered with). Why did the UK veto Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry?
    30
  5. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    22
  6. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    12
  7.  @vplan  Yep
    12
  8. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    8
  9. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    7
  10. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    7
  11. The UK vetoed Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry. This speaks volumes.
    3
  12.  @view1st  It's a good question, but there's a big issue. The west will not allow for a proper investigation. The forensic analysis is suppose to be done immediately. The fact that they wish to conceal the evidence means that they are trying to hide something. If the west does do an investigation, it will be biased. Just like the OPCW investigation in Syria (Douma). It was a clear false flag. Many experts have proven that fact and the whistleblowers also raised concern. They lie, cheat and steal. They're are not very good at it. But, they manage to fool the willfully ignorant masses. A proper investigation would involve investigators from countries that have taken a neutral stance. That would minimize emotional bias. Russian and Ukrainian investigators would also be involved. They can supervise the investigation. If they have a concern about how the investigation is being conducted. They can state why. Proper forensic procedure should be followed under the supervision of the Russian and Ukrainian observers. They will not allow for such an investigation. Too much time has been lost anyway.
    2
  13. Russian troops withdrew from Buch.a on the 30th of March. International journalists arrived and interviewed the lord mayor of the city on television and he never mentioned the massacre. Why did it take so long to mention the massacre? It appears that this was staged. The UK vetoed Russia's UN call for an independent enquiry. Why is the west against a forensic investigation? There should be a comprehensive and impartial international investigation. They are trying to hide the truth.
    2
  14.  @zackklein2225  yep, yep, yep
    2
  15.  Pinnedby Alex Christoforou  fu
    2
  16. @Just Chill yep
    2
  17.  @mdol5732  There should be a comprehensive and impartial international investigation. Each dead body needs to be subjected to a forensic investigation (time of death, mechanism of death and we need to determine if the body has been tampered with). Why did the UK veto Russia’s proposal for an immediate independent enquiry? I think that they want to hide the truth. Think about it. This is an alleged crime scene. The UK is refusing to allow an independent forensic investigation.
    1
  18. Thank you for the update. The UK vetoed Russia's UN call for an independent enquiry. They don't want the truth to come out. Why would Russian troops deliberately target civilians? Targeting civilians goes against their objective. Why is the west against a forensic investigation? There should be a comprehensive and impartial international investigation. The fact that this has not and will not happen, tells us all we need to know. They are trying to hide the truth.
    1
  19.  Pinnedby Alex Christoforou  fu
    1
  20. There is plenty of evidence showing Ukrainian troops using civilian shields (deliberately turning residential areas into battle fields). Even the pro-Ukrainian Washington Post admitted to this fact.
    1