Comments by "" (@PerceivedREALITY999) on "Ukraine offered accelerated path to NATO membership — without clear timeline" video.

  1. America always claims to defend human rights in order to justify its acts of aggression. Their actions are always given a pleasant name in order to encourage public support. “Operation enduring freedom” was the virtuous name given to the unjust invasion of Afghanistan. “Operation Iraqi freedom” was the angelic title for the brutal invasion of Iraq. “Operation unified protector” was the fancy name for the destruction of Libya. The guardians of the universe can do no wrong, since they always fight for “freedom and democracy”.
    114
  2. nato is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria etc.
    43
  3.  @jptrainor  The only thing Zelensky succeeded in, is destroying his country by refusing to negotiate.
    16
  4.  @paulinegauthier1867  The NATO invasion of Afghanistan was not legal under international law. There was no imminent threat that Afghanistan would attack the US or another UN member country. The council did not authorize the US or any other country to use military force against Afghanistan. The US war in Afghanistan was illegal. According to Brown University researchers, the US War in Afghanistan (2001-2022) cost the US (tax payers) $2.313 trillion. I can think of better ways to spend this money. How about improving the US infrastructure or helping the US citizens who are living in poverty (approximately 37.9 million people). Poppy cultivation drastically increased in Afghanistan during the US invasion. In Afghanistan opium production surged from around 180 tonnes in 2001 to 9,900 tonnes in 2017.
    12
  5.  @paulinegauthier1867  The US took 20 years to replace the taliban with "the taliban".
    11
  6.  @paulinegauthier1867  The only thing Zelensky succeeded in, is destroying his country by refusing to negotiate.
    11
  7.  @jptrainor  The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time nato has tried to pick on someone their own size and nato is getting humiliated.
    10
  8.  @paulinegauthier1867  I replied to you in detail. But my comment is hidden. This is what they call "freedom and democracy".
    4
  9.  @MutatedPizzaBoi  I replied to you in detail. But my comment is hidden. This is what they call "freedom and democracy".
    3
  10.  @louistournas120  The US took 20 years to replace the taliban with "the taliban".
    2
  11.  @AsianVideoGamer  You're right.
    1
  12.  @louistournas120  The taliban has taken most of the weapons abandoned by the US troops.
    1
  13.  @louistournas120  The US funded the taliban in the 80's.
    1
  14.  @louistournas120  You stated: "The taliban outnumber them". What does this tell you? "The goal is an endless war, not a successful war"
    1
  15.  @louistournas120  According to Brown University researchers, the US War in Afghanistan (2001-2022) cost the US (tax payers) $2.313 trillion. I can think of better ways to spend this money. How about improving the US infrastructure or helping the US citizens who are living in poverty (approximately 37.9 million people).
    1
  16.  @louistournas120  “The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe and back into the hands of a transnational security elite."
    1
  17.  @louistournas120  The NATO invasion of Afghanistan was not legal under international law. There was no imminent threat that Afghanistan would attack the US or another UN member country. The council did not authorize the US or any other country to use military force against Afghanistan. The US war in Afghanistan was illegal.
    1
  18.  @louistournas120  Poppy cultivation drastically increased in Afghanistan during the US invasion. In Afghanistan opium production surged from around 180 tonnes in 2001 to 9,900 tonnes in 2017. Why was this allowed to happen?
    1