Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Trump's plan for peace negotiations" video.
-
10
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mindbodyinstitute2652 'If NATO had to win and committed to doing so Russia stands zero chance'.
You are giving theoretical estimates of NATO strengths and claiming superiority over Russia in every which way : population, economic size, technology, combined military assets.
However, one has to go by battlefield performance. The fact is Russia has destroyed all vaunted western weapons : HIMARS, Leopards, Challengers, Abrams, Storm Shadows, Patriots. The west does not have 155 mm shells. Russia blunted the NATO led Ukrainian 2023 counter offensive, and has attacked and taken most of Donbass. The Russian soldier is hardy and determined, and they are patriotic.
The fact is the US now wants a ceasefire and negotiations. Why not continue if you have superior arms and economy ? The US has said Ukraine must accept it cannot regain 2014 borders let alone 1991; Ukraine cannot be in NATO and the US will not supply peace keeping troops. Europe is in a bind on the peace keeping formula. Russia will not agree to EU troops. Russia has therefore won.
NATO (despite its strength on paper) is incapable of winning a war. We saw that in Afghanistan. Against Russia, it has no chance - as the outcome in Ukraine proves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1