Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "US weapons will give Russia significant problems" video.

The difference may last 1 month, till the Russians find an anti dote as they always do. They destroyed the invincible Challengers, Leopards and Abrams with drones. They destroyed the Bradleys. The US sent cluster weapons, it made no difference. The Himars worked for some time and then were jammed and missed targets. These ATACAMS and strikes inside Russia are not new, they were doing it, but it made no difference. Russia steps up and retaliates in a bigger way. The last time Ukraine did something in Russia, Russia destroyed the power production units. The war is lost for the west in 2023. Now it is the end game and it is in Russia's favour. The panic in Ukraine and the west is palpable. Every now and then there is a euphoria and hope and then it fades quickly. Sometime ago when 60 billion was sanctioned. But no tangible result was seen. Now missile strike on Russia is the great hope. Then Zelenksy's peace conference ! After that F 16s. The Russians get plenty of time to prepare the counter since the west announces its plans months before. Meanwhile Chasov Yar is being broken into.
3
@dpelpal Thee Rushin' military is a bit of a joke, but you always sound like a frightened rabbit despite being far from the bear.
2
@nigelgarrett7970 'yours are coping hard...' I am panicking so much I am having difficulty typing. You have difficulty writing English. Not educated enough perhaps ?
2
The west is defeated, every now and then they make some statement of intent to salvage their pride, there is euphoria for some time, but they find Russia is stronger than the combined west. A paper tiger can fight a real bear only in rhetoric !
2
@BTinSF NATO countries will have to back down as Russia has run it out of weapons and NATO is not prepared to be killed. Ukraine should never have been pushed to fight Russia. And Ukrainians should not have been dumb enough to accept western backing as fighting a war with external support depends on goodwill and capability of the donor.
1
@BTinSF Ukraine had the choice to stay neutral and not join any military alliance as per its 1992 declaration of independence. But the US incited a coup in 2014 where the elected govt. was overthrown and a US supporting govt, was put in place. Among the mobs during the coup were Ukro Nazi groups like Right Sector and Azov Batallion. US schemers like the Jew Victoria Nuland and John MaCain were in the crowds distributing sweets after the coup. What were they doing there ? It was the Ukrainian choice to embrace anti-Russianism to gain US favour. So they have no else to blame. Even after 2 months of the war, there were peace negotiations in Turkey in which an agreement was initialed. But Boris Johnson came and talked them out of it, and told them they could win if they continued fighting. The Ukrainians went with that, it was their choice to believe they could win, giving no option for Russia than to dismember Ukraine. To survive, they need 100 Patriot batteries which no one can supply. To roll back Russia from what they have taken is impossible as the the 2023 offensive showed. They do not have the manpower. So the goose is cooked for Ukraine. Due to their own folly in thinking that they can use the west to threaten Russia. Get it ?
1
@wwlb4970 Ukraine does not have to invade Russia, it posed a threat to Russia by seeking to invite the US to put missile and naval bases to threaten Russia.
1
@wwlb4970 Ukraine was part of Russia. Russians and Ukrainians did not have a very differentiated identity, they were intermarried and Ukranians were leaders of the Soviet Union, like Krushchev, Brezhnev, Chernenko. When given independence, the Ukrainians could not manage, they descended into neo Nazi Russophobic nationalism, encouraged by the US. Once the US infiltrates, that country is destroyed. It is characteristic of Anglo Saxons to seize on differences and instigate conflicts everywhere. War for profit is their culture. They have done that to break up the Ottoman empire (pit Arabs against Turks), in India pit various communities against each other to partition it, just to name a few. They have done the same in Ukraine. Except Russia is a superpower, it will fight and smash anyone that threatens it. That is the bottom line. Get it ? Ukraine is not in a position to fight Russia, with or without western support. The Ukraine of 1992 is not coming back, just get over it, don't waste your money on lost causes. The west is declining, it has enough problems, de-industrialisation, dying populations due to low fertility, anxiety about immigration, the western financial grip on the world is slipping as Russia and China drive de-dollarisation. I would not waste my time fighting lost causes. A new world order had emerged due to Russia and China, and the rest of the world will go with it. The west can fit into that or it fizzle out.
1
'One is left wondering what Ukrainians could have achieved if they wouldn't have to fight with one hand tied from the first days of the war.' No point wondering, because the west knows Russia will use nukes on Ukraine and if needed on the west. The Russians are not going to allow US bases in Ukraine, and they are ready for nuclear war if needed. Get it ? Now the US understands it also even if you are too dimwitted to understand.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 You are not educated enough because if you were, you would have written a refutation of what I wrote about junk western equipment, instead of making personal comments.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 'If we are nit picking then antidote is one word. Educated enough?' You are not educated enough. Nitpicking is one word ! You are a numskull.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 The British were claiming Challengers are invincible. The Americans said the same about Abrams. All because they could fight in Iraq against opposition that did not have the latest. But when the Challengers, Leopards and Abrams came out in Ukraine, Russia destroyed them. The Ukrainian counter offensive failed despite these, cluster bombs, Himars. True or not ? '....just that they are better than the Soviet and Russian ones' That is a conviction born out of conceit. Where is the evidence ? Russia destroyed all types of your equipment. Your equipment is junk, NATO has not fought a war that it has won, nor have the British, French or Americans. The way NATO ran away from Kabul proves you are cowards, and you cannot fight. The Russians have combined arms warfare capability that no one else has. That is tanks, drones, missiles, thermobaric weapons, hypersonic missiles, electronic jamming all working together. They have unused capability in anti-satellite destruction and nuclear weapons, so they hold the nuclear sword above you. And the Russians can fight - you saw in Bakhmut, and how they torched the Ukro Nazis in Mariopol. The collective west cannot match Russia. You may recall the Red Army beat Germany into a pulp. Like that the Russians can beat NATO into a pulp. Britain can be finished with a single hypersonic Sarmat missile. If for a moment you really believed your weapons were better and you thought you could win, you would have sent troops to Ukraine. But you know you will be killed on a scale you did not experience before.
1
@criticalcharge8172 And despite your staggering claims, Russia has taken 4 oblasts, Ukraine was unable o get them back, and Russia is advancing. Russia has killed off much of the professional Ukrainian army, and the west is unable to even supply 150 mm shells in quantity, let alone Patriots. Russia is not only demilitarising Ukraine - but also NATO ! Even western media says Russia is producing more shells than the combined west. Get it ? You need to have a reality check.
1
@criticalcharge8172 Putin said it is cheaper to fight now to stop US bases in Ukraine than if Ukraine got into NATO. Then Russia would have to fight a nuclear war. By fighting now, Russia has checkmated all US plans for NATO bases in Ukraine. Get it ? 'All conflicts after WW2 pales in comparison to the losses Russia has endured in these 2 years of warfare against a country who has no operational navy, no air superiority, and no manufacturing capabilities for shells and vehicles.' You are slyly trying to belittle Russia because it has losses from a country who has no operational navy, no air superiority, and no manufacturing capabilities for shells and vehicles. But Russia is in effect fighting NATO , as NATO is supplying all these things to the country that does not have them. Russia has thereby proved it is stronger than entire NATO. Then what is your point ?
1