Comments by "Baresi-Unico-Capitano" (@recruitmentch) on "Questions about Graham Potter's future following Fulham loss | Paper Talk" video.

  1. Totally agree on havertz. Mount too.
    4
  2. The argument that the return of injured players are a major factor is completely flawed. 1. Chilwell - not proven at Chelsea, lots of injuries and never guaranteed to offer a bump up on cucurella or Hall 2. Fofana - not proven at Chelsea and no guarantee he adds quality - played and outclassed in defeats before injury 3. James - can add quality 4. Kante - no guarantee that he would return to previous levels. When was the last time Kante was performing at a top level? 5. Pulisic - this guy would struggle to get into the Brentford side, let alone the myth of being a miss for Chelsea. He has never been good enough. 6. Loftus cheek - are you having a laugh? The players Chelsea are putting out might not be champions league positions or title winning levels, but they are definitely not as bad as they're playing. Potter is clearly well out of his depth.
    2
  3.  @y0Fusionn  Actually if you were to ignore his unusually good stats from last season in the premier league, his output this season is in line with his usual level.
    1