Comments by "" (@obsidianjane4413) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1. ​ @chattywalrus8485  Not even that probably (hopefully). It'd be like," Okay, come back around sunset, and start walking around very slowly and quietly and look very closely around the base of the bushes for glowing eyes. If you see some, then... yeah, that's 'your' ocselot."
    1
  2.  @gravelydon7072  "finger food" or "finger IS food"? :)
    1
  3. Hundreds of tons...
    1
  4.  @rizizum  Wow you just rationalized the shit out of that.
    1
  5. Your tax dollars at.... something.
    1
  6. Wait a few years and send up a Starship and bring it back to Earth for a factory refit.
    1
  7. You could have learned that in the time it took you to write the question...
    1
  8. Not bad for a water tower.
    1
  9. metal rich combustion is never good...
    1
  10. @15:20 "Potatoe Potato" On orbit- Spacecraft is in its final planned orbit it was intended to achieve where its doing its mission. In orbit- General term for anything in an orbit about something else. Could be maneuvering or not.
    1
  11.  @durragas4671  And they are the equivalent of a 386...
    1
  12.  @KronosGodwisen  Sure it looks extremely cold. Sure it looks near vacuum. The "water" we are finding is either scant molecules or solid mineral deposits. I am very sure there is no life on Mars. Probably never was.
    1
  13. Scott Manley, flying stoned...
    1
  14. I get the bad feeling that we will look back fondly at Rogozin as the voice of moderation in Roscosmos...
    1
  15. Probably not. I think those are maximum, and "Elon Time/numbers".
    1
  16. It would never have worked. It was the most Rube Goldburged Rube Goldburg of a rocket engine possible. I thought they had gone bankrupt a decade ago.
    1
  17. That was a fair evaluation of the project.
    1
  18. Venus' interaction with the solar wind produces a magnetic field, like a "bow shock wave" that sort of makes the comparatively dense gases "sticky". So it doesn't lose as much. Outgassing from the planet probably helps too.
    1
  19. Hey! They tested it in KSP so its all good to go! I bet they still find suck.... er investers.
    1
  20.  @peoplez129  The human body is quite stretchy too.
    1
  21. @3:42 a fissile fizzle?
    1
  22. Wait... we are still paying for Starliner?
    1
  23.  @dancingisraeli911  You are part of the problem.
    1
  24. Temperature is too high. But the density is such that it is as close to liquid as a gas can get.
    1
  25. Considering current events, I hope not.
    1
  26.  @williamgreene4834  Space is dangerous. We didn't move on. We moved back.
    1
  27.  @williamgreene4834  Starship exists thru the force of will of a single man. Otherwise, you would have nothing but the retrograde products of the mil-ind-complex. And its STILL going to be close to 20 yrs. before anything approaching the capabilities of the STS is reconstituted.
    1
  28. I'm just disappointed that we didn't get video of the RUD.
    1
  29.  @WasatchWind  They've just teamed up with China and the rest of their Axis buddies they still have left.
    1
  30. If you ever do a give-away you could use posting a count of the ever increasing number of Kerbals infesting your office.
    1