Comments by "Andy Hughes" (@andyhughes1776) on "Face the Nation" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 4
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. LoL....these Western analysts had it all wrong about Russian troops right from the get-go. Remember the West thought that the 40-mile long convoy was stalled and that the Russians must have exhausted food, water, fuel, and supplies? They even claimed that the Russians used old equipment that broke down on them, hence they stalled. I knew at the time that it cannot be true because the Russians OWN THE skies over Ukraine therefore they can always airdrop any supplies they needed. Sure enough, the West found out that the convoy was ordered to halt so that civilians could flee via the humanitarian corridor Putin had created for them. Soon after, the convoy split up and surrounded key cities (how could they do that if they had ran out of fuel like the West claimed?) Now, the West is wrong again about the Russians hunkering down as a sign that they have stalled. LoL....they hunkered down to cut off food, water, and supplies going into these cities. They are starving the Ukrainian combatants into giving up. Any Army strategist knows that urban warfare favors the defender, as the U.S. Army found out in Iraq. It took them years to fully control Iraq - remember President Bush had to order 20,000 more troops into Iraq in 2007 in what was known as the Surge? (4 years AFTER U.S. troops began invading Iraq!) The Russians knows not to make the same mistake as the U.S. So rather than trying to go room-to-room in a buildin g-to-building fight, the Russians use the strategy of attrition. That frees up the rest of their troops to press forward to Donbass. Again, the U.S. is always behind the Russians.
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1