Comments by "Andy Hughes" (@andyhughes1776) on "Washington Post" channel.

These flying objects are now proven to exist in physical reality (via radar, infrared, as well as visual detection by multiple instruments of different designs and at different angles). The extreme behavior of these objects rules out man-made and natural objects. What other possibilities are there?
22
And what we're seeing are flying objects under intelligent control with the extreme performance none of our scientific theories could explain.
2
@@markw592 What transpired in the last couple of years convinced me that whatever the government claims, go opposite, and you are probably correct. For 70 years, our government had brainwashed everyone to make a joke out of UFOs, but now overwhelming evidence from the Navy forced them to finally admit that these things do indeed exist. They just don't know what these things are. Big change from 70 years of denial - "No, there is nothing there. You are hallucinating or misidentifying mundane objects."
2
Putin NEVER WANTED TO conquer Ukraine in the first place! So for General Milley to say that he doesn't think that Russia will ever dominate Ukraine goes without saying - of course not because Putin simply never wanted to!! Putin just wanted Ukraine to 1) Never join NATO - ever (so that NATO / U.S. cannot place missiles at his border with Ukraine.) 2) Stop oppressing ethnic Russians who live in Ukraine He had asked for this guarantee for over 20 years. He even agree to let Zelinsky stay in power. Is that too much to ask?
2
@Roscius No asserting properties. These things have been verified to exist by highly advanced, multii-billion dollar military radar, infrared, and visual equipment. Sounds like you didn't know about the Nimitz Incident in 2004.
1
@Daniel Tilghman Yep...the Book of Ezekiel described a landing craft, NOT angels. Angels do not need machines to fly. UFOs are metallic, geometric, symmetrically shaped machines. By definition, machines are manufactured by an intelligence with a physical body, not spiritual like Angels.
1
@Daniel Tilghman Early man mistaken a flying machine for God or Angels. Angels do not need to enter a flying disc made of metal to get around. The description in Ezekiel is of a flying machine that kicked up dirt and made loud noises JUST LIKE TODAY'S rockets and jets. It was a MISINTERPRETATION of what they saw. They saw flying MACHINES made by intelligent beings outside earth. They did NOT see God, Angels, or demons. That doesn't mean that God doesn't exist. It just means that what those early men called God was not!
1
@Daniel Tilghman How do you know if yours is not an opinion either? Mine is based on studies of early humans, who often label anything they don't understand as "God" or "Angels". For example, Christians often think the phrase, "You can't see God" to mean "You are forbidden from seeing God". Nope! The latest findings of high energy science (Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Superstrings Theory, Simulation Theory) showed that there is indeed a field of intelligent energy behind all of existence - what humans have been calling "God" for centuries. We can't see this field because it is made up of energy, which has no form, is not physical, and exists OUTSIDE our physical reality. That's why we can't see it! It's not because we are forbidden - we simply are not equipped to detect it directly at all. Indirectly, yes....but not directly.
1
@Darlene Smith Regardless, the fact is THERE IS SOMETHING PHYSICAL THERE! Unidentified doesn't mean doesn't exist. UFOs exist alright. We just don't know what they are. But based on their behavior, we do know that: 1) They are extremely fast 2) They respond when approached (which suggests that they are under intelligent control) 3) They could stay aloft for weeks while ascending and descending many times (which suggests they have a lot of internal energy none of our aircraft could have) 4) They have geometric shape with smooth metallic surface, which suggests they are manufactured, not random shaped natural objects. All these characteristics suggest they are traveling machines not built by humans.
1
@Daniel Yep, in other words, absence of evidence doesn't mean evidence of absence. But in recent years, we are beyond that, as stated before - the most advanced military sensors had confirmed UFOs do exist in the flesh. The question is who built it.
1
@Toaster N'Friends The military won't because they are trying to reverse engineer these things to weaponize them. The next best thing we have are the testimonies of those who collected those radar images for the Navy while they were on active duty. The radar boss, Chief Kevin Day, along with his crew all came forward to collaborate on what they saw. Not only that, the F-18 Top Gun graduate who actually chased after a "flying tic-tac" and his Wing Woman who circled around him from above while he chased the UFO in a circle. They all saw it first-hand.
1
@Darlene Smith Eyewitness testimony is sufficient IF 1) Made by reliable sources such as highly trained, experienced, and disinterested party, 2) they corroborate. Using your logic, the Higgs boson is not proven to exist because of zig-zagging lights. All instruments of the U.S. Navy detected the same object that day - infrared, radar, visual, and even sonar. If it's just one or even two, you could argue it's "artifact" but not all instruments. In fact, Kevin Day rebooted his radar and it became even clearer. In another incident, LT Graves detected these objects after he received to latest APG-79 radar. Before, when they used the older version, the APG -73, they didn't detect anything. LT Underwood actually saw one cut right through his 2-aircraft formation. It came within feet of his F-18 so there was no way that thing didn't exist. He described it as a dark gray cube inside a transparent sphere. It flew AGAINST the wind so it can't be a balloon. Again, UFOs have been proven to exist in the flesh. Now, whether they are alien or nit is up for debate. But being that the same type of objects were seen by WWII pilots over 80 years ago as well as throughout human history (cave wall carvings, Egyptian hieroglyphics, etc), I lean more towards the outside earth origin explanation.
1
@Darlene Smith You can conclude that something is a manufactured craft via its physical characteristics and its behavior. In other words, if quacks like a duck and waddled like a duck, it is most likely a duck! These objects have the following characteristics: 1) They have perfect geometric shapes such as an oval (tic-tac), saucer, cigar, a hat, a triangle, a diamond, a Chevron, etc. Natural objects are not perfectly shaped. 2) Their surface are smooth and uniform in color such as porcelain, or gleaming like refined metal. Naturally occuring objects do not have uniform color nor texture They have the following behaviors: 1) They go from sea level to 80,000 feet and vice versa for weeks. They can also stay aloft and maneuver around against the wind for weeks. This suggests an internal energy and propulsion of some sort. Natural objects cannot do that. 2) They change trajectory whe approached. Indeed, the tic-tac in the Nimitz incident chased an F-18 in circle twice before speeding of at Great speed. Natural objects cannot do that. Regarding detection, you didn't realize that those multi-billion instruments were the most advanced military sensors ever devised in human history. They were made SPECIFICALLY to detect and track real physical objects (such as enemy airctaft) in order to shoot them down! And as I said, they use DIFFERENT spectrums and designs yet detected the same objects. So the chance of a false detection is next to zero. In conclusion, if you take ALL of these evidence IN TOTALITY then it is clear that these things are real physical objects and that they are manufactured craft and not Natural and/or inanimate objects.
1
Examine closely what the government said. They said they don't know what these things are. They no longer deny that these aerial objects exist.
1
And who made the MiG-29? It ain't America! Who is stupid enough to use a weapon and technique your enemy created against him? That's like using the fighting technique you learn from Bruce Lee against him. Who do you think would win? Ukraine and the West are stupid to use MiGs against the Russians - they created it so of course they know every trick to defeat the weapon they invented! No wonder Ukraine had lost the war.
1