Comments by "KesArt" (@kesart8378) on "Face the Nation" channel.

  1. 37
  2. 26
  3. 20
  4. 19
  5. 14
  6. 12
  7. 12
  8. 11
  9. 7
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. Deat SCHOOLTHEWORLD, First, may I say that as a parent and grandparent I empathize with the instinct to protect one's offspring against unknown, potentially harmful forces. However, as a retired professor and proud father of a son who is a neurologist, I feel compelled to place a good deal of stock in what the medical and scientific experts say. At this point in time the experts, given how recently this new corona virus made its debut, cannot say with certainty how long--and how effective--"natural immunity" (i.e.: immunity acquired through exposure to the virus, exposure that prompts the body to generate antibodies to combat the virus) will prove. They need more time and more data. My kids and grandchild live in the state of Florida and they have not abandoned masking--particularly when indoors amongst people whom they do not know. My four-year old granddaughter wears a mask at preschool and takes a mask to public parks, and is reminded not to crowd too closely to unmasked children in the park. (My kids have a "pod," a group of parents and children who practice the same preventative health measures, which, therefore, makes them safer to socialize with than those who are lax about following health guidelines.) So given that we care so much about our little ones, we exercise great caution and take with a huge grain of salt the pronouncements of politicians--particularly state governors who wish to claim the title of, "First to reopen." Perhaps the CDC article about types of immunity (link below) will be of some assistance. Stay safe and be well. Cheers https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/immunity-types.htm
    5
  17. 5
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. Ah, the scholarly chin-whiskered chap clearly belongs in the camp of empiricism and not rationalism: he seems willing to believe only what his own extremely limited experience presents to his highly suggestible mind. He believes that what he imagines that he perceived--or, rather, what his brain interpreted from the limited, decontextualized data it received--constitutes "the truth." And, more troubling, is his faith that his very limited experiences--what legal types call "anecdotal"--can be extrapolated on a grand scale, grand enough to permit him to condemn an entire electoral system from minuscule bits of interpreted occurrences. From little snippets--confined to one very specific location--can a great cloth be constructed. Mountains from molehills. Global conspiracies from what he observed and interpreted as irregularities during the terrible brief time that he was present in one singular polling place...But he's not--as he's quick to interject--"a conspiracy theorist." Interesting, too, is the fact that this average Joe had no knowledge that Trump's appointee, Chris Krebs, the nonpartisan director of CISA, had certified the election as "...the most secure in American history," a statement supported by the FBI'S Christopher Wray, another Trump appointee. And when pressed on this issue, Mr. Average Citizen said that he doesn't pay attention to "supposition," only facts. (Read: "Only what I observed/experienced directly in my very small sphere/bubble.") So for this chap to be enlightened would require transporting him to every state--and several randomly chosen polling places within each state--on Election Day so that his untrained eyes could see firsthand what transpired. Oh, and it would absolutely require unplugging him from the feeds of right-wing, pro-Trump propaganda mills. Like weaning a five year old child who has only known breastfeeding for her life to date. Imagine the ghastly howling triggered by such deprivation.
    3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30.  @mariar2651  Thank you for the civil manner in which you presented your thesis. However, your points have been thoroughly debunked in so many venues that I find myself a bit embarrassed that you are banging a drum long broken and discarded. The changes in voting methodology were inarguably necessary given that America--and the world--was in the throes of the first wave of the pandemic and a failure to make healthful accommodations to how Americans vote would have constituted criminal negligence. Health concerns, not darkly sinister political machinations, prompted the changes. As for the legality of said changes, sixty plus court challenges found no merit to any of the allegations that you raise. That reality, in addition to the fact that the Supervisors of Elections in all fifty American states--a goodly number dominated by Republican legislatures--certified their states' elections should have put this matter to bed...but apparently not for some doggedly persistent folk. As for the issue of Russian interference--are we really still litigating the 2016 election?--all components of America's alphabet soup intelligence community--FBI, CIA, NSA--as well as the Director of National Intelligence, agreed that Russian agents had succeeded in intruding electronically into the American 2016 election--and for the purpose of tilting the election to Trump. Regarding the fantasy that then Vice President Joe Biden interfered in Ukrainian politics in order to secure a position with Burisma for his son, Hunter, this matter, too, has been exhaustively investigated, both by the press, foreign and domestic, and by the U.S. intelligence agencies, and found to be without merit. Yes, Hunter Biden is an opportunistic charlatan and all-round gobsh**e, but those self evident facts aside, Biden forced the firing of a corrupt, pro-Putin, Ukrainian prosecutor with the full support--and urging--of America's UK and European allies, none of whom gave a tinker's damn about Hunter Biden's job prospects. So while I very much appreciate your civility and decency, I must admit to a measure of disappointment at the dredging up of tired, meritless talking points that are rooted in a belief in grand conspiracies, conspiracies that sprang from the minds of partisan political operatives, only to wither in the light of day. Cheers
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1