Comments by "KesArt" (@kesart8378) on "The Ring of Fire"
channel.
-
74
-
30
-
15
-
12
-
9
-
Taylor-Greene's supporters, just as Trump's supporters, favour entertainment value in those whom they support. Actual ability as a legislator--or president--takes a distant back seat to "charisma." Far too often I have heard Trump/ Taylor-Greene boosters explain their support with the words "She/he speaks her/his mind no matter whom they offend." Or, "She/he has so much energy; Biden is boring. "
My five year old granddaughter speaks her mind with little consideration as to the ramifications of doing so. And while I applaud her fierce, articulate, independent streak, I am not compensating her with a six-figure salary, nor do I, nor her parents, give her tasks upon which the success of the household rests.
Isn't it time for all Americans to set the bar higher and to demand far more of politicians than they employ the verbal filter that every stable adult learned the value of long ago.
Lastly, the true madness of Taylor-Greene became fully apparent to me when I watched a tape of her calling out the President of the United States with the words, "Joe Biden, you're a piece of s**t!" Her true derangement never shone clearer than in that moment, which given her catalogue of demonstrably unstable, patently offencive behaviour, is no mean feat.
9
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@waynegnarlie1 Pastor Niemoller's now famous prose clearly implies that silence equals complicity. When moral people fail to oppose evil, they are in effect condoning it, and that through their failure to oppose said evil they may well find themselves prey to that same evil.
Perhaps in a fashion Niemoller's mea culpa can be viewed as a an appeal to both humankind's better angels, as well as to self-interest: When people speak out against that which they clearly know to be wrong, they are, through their opposition, helping to limit the spread--and hopefully ending the influence--of the malignancy that they have chosen to repudiate, for hate, when left unchecked, often proves insatiable in that once it has a foothold it seeks out other targets to conquer.
Niemoller has, as a clear predecessor the writer John Donne whose poetical Meditation, remembered for the "No Man Is An Island" section, cautioned readers to remember that we are all parts of a greater whole, all interconnected, and that what ill befalls one affects all.
Thus, those who excused the near ceaseless bigotry, racism and nativism of Trump did, through their permissiveness, smooth the path for other haters, such as Representative Gosar.
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Depression, by itself, is not synonymous with a failure of one's critical faculties. Many adults who do suffer from depression still manage to maintain their dignity, maturity and their ability to accept disappointment and frustration without flying into a rage at every additional perceived slight, or imagined wrong.
Unfortunately, people who place their faith in fables and insupportable narratives will suffer grave disappointment when said myths and fictive narratives crumble.
In an epoch in which change occurs at a rate far more rapid than of previous ages, people can experience a not unreasonable sense of insecurity. And an age of anxiety provides fertile ground for a demagogue.
Trump, and his minions, recognized the vast reservoir of flammable white male grievance and sense of victimhood--and its concomitant anxiety over the predicted coming diminution of White Christian male hegemony--out in America and they gleefully tossed a match upon it. Trump did not create "the rage on the right"--which January sixth showed the entire world was not a pathology solely the province of rural, undereducated Whites--but he supercharged it.
But before Trump's normalizing of incivility and aggressivity towards one's opponents came his attack upon facts, upon essential American institutions, such as the free press, the intelligence services, and the "liberal judiciary," as well as uponTruth itself. And once you can convince your disciples that all their worries and disappointments spring not--even part--from themselves, but from a network of formerly trusted Judases now revealed to have been the source of their woes all along...that can prove quite frightening and depressing...unless you provide a saviour, a bringer of the REAL TRUTH, someone who will convince the fretful, fearful masses not to place their faith in their own deceiving eyes and ears, but in him.
Again, this willingness of those on the American right to embrace an autocrat evolved over time; it did not start with Trump. And the erosion of the American educational system, the rise of the Internet, the decline of traditional, formerly trusted sources of information, the slide into a post-textual/post-literate age did not happen overnight. But Republicans found in Donald Trump the perfect avatar with which to capitalize upon the racism, xenophobia, "replacement theory" fears, misogyny, and degraded powers of discernment that led to an inability to recognize the real sources of America's problems, and a pronounced exuberance in welcoming the "Chosen One" with his crusade intent on overturning comity, traditions, decorousness, even established laws and time-honoured policies all to dismantle American institutions--indeed, democracy, itself--in order to keep real the fantasy of returning to that Great America, Again, that whitewashed, heavily edited, ahistorical version still alive in the minds of true believers.
Yes, so when your "Chosen One" falls from power, through treachery (read: "rigged elections"), just as he had predicted--"One of you will betray me...the one who dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray me."--do you not--as a faithful disciple--have the right to grieve/be depressed, and, post-bereavement period, seek vengeance. " You have to fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore "
And when one legal attempt to overturn the election after another fails, and your legal crusaders-Lin Wood, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell- labour under ridicule, sanctions and lawsuits, and the holy audit of Maricopa County has yet to yield the desired results after all this time, , and even the "patriotic" attack upon the Capitol failed to achieve its intended ends, anger grows and depression deepens, depression and anger deepened by the radical-liberal-socialist cabal trying to usurp your "rights" as a parent with mask mandates, and vaccination requirements. And you'll be damned if you will let THEM make you feel powerless. (And damn this pandemic that don't want to call it quits--though I'm sure not getting any DNA altering vaccine, I just want to return to life as it was pre-COVID.)
So I'm going to plant my flag at the school board meeting so those fascist board members--and anyone who sees the resulting video, will know just how angry and tired (read: depressed) I truly am.
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
We need to take a breath and pause lest, in our rush to judgment, we disenfranchise those Trump voters who suffer from Dissociative Personality Disorder: If the dominant personality of an individual afflicted with DPD happens to be pro-Trump, then said individual must verify, through the unimpeachable sworn testimony of a highly credentialed mental health expert, that they suffer from DPD (formerly referred to as Multiple Personality Disorder).
If such certification does pass muster, so to speak then election officials must weigh the possibility of allowing said individual(s) to vote more than once.
Furthermore, the determinant of how many times each person afflicted with DPD should rest with a panel of preeminent scholar/practitioners from the field of Psychiatry whose speciality resides within the study of Dissociative Personality Disorder.
To assuage skeptics reading this, we wish to remind said skeptics that those plagued by this disorder act as vessels for personalities that usually differ considerably in temperament and, thus, quite likely in political outlook.
So while all this may prove a wash, we must remember Mitch McConnell's highly garbled exhortation--translated by scientists intimately familiar with the vocalizations of amphibians, specifically frogs--that "PresidentTrump is 100% within his rights to look into allegations of 'irregularities' and to weigh his legal options."
Thus the obscene carnival rolls on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Assistint A reasonable proposition if one can ascertain that the great majority of the population possesses the competence--a fair degree of literacy, as well as a knowledge, and familiarity, of the issues of the day. If not, then in this "post-literate" age you are ceding far too much power to a poplace, far too many of whom cite Facebook as their top source for the news, as the arbiters of what is right, fair, practicable, and necessary for the nation. And that constitutes a giant, and risky, experiment.
The problem in these highly polarized times lies in convincing politicians-arguably, particularly Republicans--to vote in concert with the people's wishes and not along partisan lines: While the majority of Americans clearly approve of Biden's infrastructure plan- especially when they learn that the plan proposes funding itself through greater taxes on the richest Americans and the largest corporations--most Republicans are following McCarthy's and McConnell's lead and opposing the plan--thus directly flouting the will of the majority of the people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pimphandduke8447 With respect, those Americans who are still very much in denial over the events of January sixth and the larger purpose behind said events very much need this special committee to lay bare the truth in such overwhelming detail as to be irrefutable to all but the most self-deceiving, immune-to-all-reason diehard supporters.
Also, Trump backers need to behold the rank hypocrisy of their beloved FOX idols, and of Don Jr., as well as the true conscienceless nature of Donald Trump.
Lastly, we did not all see the same account of that fateful day: Outlets such as FOX, OANN, NEWSMAX, and other far-right platforms, aired a carefully curated version of January sixth. Scenes of police opening barriers for protesters, joking with such fine people, and posing for pictures with them received much attention and rebroadcasting, but the assaults on police, the smashing of windows, the crowd chanting, "Hsng Mike Pence,: etc., such damning visual evidence received scant if any coverage on the far-right, aggressively pro-Trump airways.
1
-
Marco Rubio, much like Lindsey Graham, is a politician flailing about desperately attempting to remain center stage and prove that he remains relevant to current events.
"Feckless," a pejorative term, often finds itself linked to Marco Rubio. Much like some attention-starved adolescents, or some has-been "influencer," Rubio's neediness compelled him to tweet out pics of a Zoom conference between himself and President Zelenskyy-- plus more than two hundred other congresspeople and staffers--to his social media followers. Rubio, as is often his wont, expressed a dismissive attitude when asked about his defiance of security protocols. But the simple fact remains that Rubio, as a veteran politician with years of experience in foreign affairs and intelligence, knew better--and did not let that knowledge stop him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ron DeSantis, the science-mocking, history-denying, vigilantism-loving, authoritarian-to-the-core partisan calculates his every action and decision in light of whether it will advance his odds of gaining the Republican nomination for the American presidency.
And Donald Trump Jr., the eternal manchild, too frequently appears to be "coked-up" whenever he delivers his mindless, hateful, senseless screeds. The undereducated boyo and his main squeeze, who appears to be channeling the late Eva Peron in the barnburner speeches that she delivers with mucho gusto, would make the perfect First Couple...of an insane asylum.
Should Americans choose to elect either DeSantis or Donnie Jr., the rest of the world will know that the end of the American experiment will have arrived. The election of either would be the equivalent of a parent placing their wee baby in a pushchair and shoving it down a steep hill toward roaring traffic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Florida legislature, with the blessing of Governor DeSantis, enacted legislation that allows citizens to use their motor vehicles to mow down protesters if they feel threatened by said protesters.
Now given that this new law intends to address the traffic-jamming racial justice protests that occurred in some American cities during the summer of 2020, I assume that DeSantis and his Republican colleagues would be nonplussed were citizens to exercise their newly granted rights to commit vehicular assault against the "trucker freedom convoy"...unless a convoy solely compromising drivers of colour were to appear.
Naturally, Florida cannot claim sole ownership of this endorsement of right wing terrorism: Several other Republican-dominated legislatures-- such as those in the states of Iowa and Oklahoma--have enacted similar laws, laws that, essentially criminalize protest and absolve those who engage in "crowd control" with their vehicles. Estimates place the number of vehicular assaults/rammings, during the post George Floyd murder protests, at greater than one hundred and possibly as high as one hundred and forty. And while a small percentage of such assaults were committed by police officers, the prosecutorial arm of American law enforcement has shown no great interest in pursuing those who committed such attacks, with just less than forty percent of such crimes resulting in prosecution.
The "arc of the moral universe" is indeed long, but such pro-terrorism legislation makes one wonder if said arc does always "bend toward justice."
https://www.vice.com/en/article/88n95a/florida-anti-rioting-law-will-make-it-much-easier-to-run-over-protesters-with-cars
https://www.businessinsider.in/policy/news/a-boston-globe-investigation-found-cars-have-rammed-into-protests-at-least-139-times-since-george-floyds-death/articleshow/87447427.cms
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bill Beaton Please accept my apologies for the tardiness of my reply. Family responsibilities must, of a necessity, take priority...But I do feel compelled to answer your comment out of respect for your interest (as evidenced by the fact that you took time to reply). But to do so I must copy and past your previous statement in order to discuss it. an action I hope you will not find objectionable.
Your opening remark, "As a well-educated and adequately intelligence gifted person, it’s amazing..." sets things off on a difficult path: Clearly you intend to reference yourself in the clause, "As a well-educated and adequately intelligence gifted person..." yet you follow that clause with the word, "it's." Given that the subject of said clause is you, the pronoun "I" must follow the modifying clause. Thus, it should read, "As a well-educated and adequately intelligence gifted person, I find it amazing..."
However, the phrase, "adequately intelligence gifted person," is fraught with problems: Everyone possesses intelligence. One might be "gifted with above average intelligence, or one might be designated as "gifted" (i.e.: of above average intelligence, or possessed of an above average I.Q.), but one may not be "intelligence gifted." Furthermore, while the term "gifted" signifies an intelligence above average the adverb, "adequately," stands in direct contrast: Adequately--meaning performing sufficient to the task, but no more--cannot reside in the same category as "gifted," a term used by educators to describe those whose I.Q. registers above 115 (as measured by such widely used testing protocols as the Stanford-Binet and/or Wechsler scales). Therefore, the phrase, "adequately intelligence gifted," presents an oxymoron and seems a bit self-condemnatory (i.e.; damning with faint praise).
Thus, you might choose to write, "As a well-educated and intellectually competent person, I find it amazing..." or, "As a well-educated person possessed of an above average intellect, I find it amazing..." (The latter may seem a bit too much like "blowing one's own horn," or a bit of braggadocio, but at least it would make sense grammatically.)
As for the passage, "...amazing that CINOs (Christian {should be plural, as in "Christians," since "CINOs" is plural} in Name Only) are incapable of allowing any verifiable form of truth and fact to ever pass their lips," it succeeds as gross generalization and hyperbole given that you cannot provide any verification--which both truth and fact require--to support such a sweeping claim. Besides, unless you wish to assert that "CINOs" entirely lack the capacity to distinguish between truth and fiction, which demands a psychiatrist's diagnostic ability, then you are left condemning an enormous cohort as truly mendacious, habitual liars who can distinguish truth from lies, but choose not to. And that is a bridge too far, an overstatement too grand.
Additionally, the statement that, "NewsOne’s existence is defacto an extremely strong argument of either abolishing freedom of religion..." leaves me puzzled: NewsOne began, and continues, as an online news organ intended for Black Americans. Such a gaffe--misspeaking typographically--weakens your thesis considerably for it raises the question: "If you can get such an important detail wrong, what else is faulty in your presentation?" (Though the vast majority of YouTube commenters clearly lack any journalistic background, fact-checking and proofreading still matter, particularly if one hopes to convince others of one's point of view.)
(Do consider reviewing the meaning of "de facto," for its use in the copied passage only diminishes your argument further given the inappropriate adjectival use of the phrase, and the muddled sentence leaves unclear whether you meant "de facto" to modify the word, "existence." or the phrase, "an extremely strong argument.." In either case, "de facto" is inappropriate.)
How does the existence of what you assumedly consider a far less than truthful, secular news outlet amount to a "...strong argument of either abolishing freedom of religion..."? And how does an American come to propose the abolition of one of the core tenets of the American republic: freedom of religion--particularly on such an exceedingly slim argument?
My apologies, but I'm a bit knackered, so I will have to conclude by asking if the phrase, "...otherwise standard responses to situations which should otherwise ignore any related belief systems," makes any sense when read aloud? How can one ignore "...any related belief systems," for the fact that such systems are "related" renders them worth consideration? Such wordy reasoning may seem impressive if only a cursory scan occurs. But further examination--which seems appropriate given the gravity of the situation under consideration--reveals a sentence crammed brimful with words that don't track, that leave a whole that is less than the sum of its parts.
Do forgive me if the above seems overly pedantic and possibly patronizing. As a retired professor (and published author), I find it difficult not to slip into old habits: When I sense that someone sincerely wishes to make a heartfelt statement--and not indulge in throwaway snark, or trolling--but has clearly missed the mark in communicating their concepts, I feel compelled to comment. I did not mean this to evolve into a dissertation, and I most certainly did not intend to give offence. Rather, my hope is that you will read your writing aloud before posting/publishing, and that you will ask yourself, "Would this make sense to that other with whom I wish to communicate?"
Cheers, mate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
This makes even more imperative the need to abolish America's Electoral College.
And then scrutiny should fall upon the United States Senate and the fact that every state has the same number of Senators regardless of size. This outdated gesture towards equality, made as a compromise at the very start of the American republic, has, at times, led to the tyranny of the minority: Small states-in terms of population- choose to vote in opposition to the interests of the larger states, who possess far greater populations, and, thus, in their combined numbers of senators, the small states succeed in defeating the large states, even though the latter represent a far greater percentage of the American population.
1
-
The burnished Hollywood image of the rugged American individualist, resorting, when morally necessary, to acts of justifiable violence, "moral" violence in service of protecting good people and lawful institutions, has transmogrified into bloody violence--preferably by high calibre firearms--as a legitimate means of dissent, of protestation.
Gone are the days when high regard followed a scholarly, articulate, elegantly designed argument, as one can imagine happening during the Lincoln v. Douglas debates.
Today, differences of opinion escalate to threats of violence, bloody and shattering, in the wink of an eye as though we suddenly found ourselves bereft of the power of speech and our desperation at this impotence demolished our self-control, that barrier evaporating before this new powerlessness, only to be replaced by a form of communication far more direct than the verbal: The physical language of rage.
And so we find white working class people, with their blue camo collars, perceiving themselves as patronized and passed over. And while they may lack the lexicon of the highly educated, they suffer no such lack of the latest and finest of military-grade hardware. And its assertions cannot be deterred by reasoned argumentation, no matter how compellingly well reasoned and handsomely presented.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Never underestimate a true zealot's sheer gobsmscking capacity for self- delusion.
Farron Cousins' suggestion that the rioters/insurrectionists perhaps viewed themselves as "MLKs" is far too glib--and worse, it sullies the memory and accomplishments of the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a man many consider a secular saint. And it also paints the insurrectionists in a wholly undeserved flattering light.
Those who gleefully engaged in violence against people and property--property previously regarded as inviolable--terrorized those who worked inside the Capitol, the heart of American democracy.
Ergo, they are terrorists, as in those who invoke terror in others for political ends.
And, yes, as terrorists they believed their "mission" righteous for they, as good disciples, were following the instructions of their idols: Trump and "Q", who--with able assists from apostles Lin Wood, Rudy Giuliani, Mo Brooks, Josh Hawley, et. al.--radicalized the sheeplike followers through unrelenting repetition of THE BIG LIE. And the disciples, particularly those who had been training for years in anticipation of such an opportunity--one in which a prominent secular, or religious figure gave them permission to proceed with their mission.
And on that terrible day in January they received an unambiguous, full-throated message to proceed.
1
-
1
-
Other than such matters as the war in Ukraine, inflation, threats from North Korea, Iran, China, and Russia, catastrophic climate change, increasing polarization among the American people, as well as the rise of the militant lunatic fringe on America's political right, the real possibility of another COVID-19 surge, the multiple threats to voting rights, race-based inequality in the American justice system, the mushrooming wealth gap, etc., ad infinitum, President Biden certainly has time to spend with an adolescent vigilante.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1