Comments by "Dave Marolda" (@RIbigDave) on "Jordan B Peterson Clips" channel.

 @SoloAdvocate nothing about his behavior was pathetic the person saying that is actually pathetic
3
@stevendouglas3781 I pretty much agree with most of your points however could you be more obnoxious?
2
@UKGeezer I'm glad that my years on campus were between 1976 and 1986. I learned how to think not what to think. I only knew the Politics of exactly four of my professors that's right four. I didn't even know that math was supposed to be racist!
2
@Andre_Thomasson not always. And while I and most of my circle of friends and family have degrees at the wazoo four of the smartest and most knowledgeable people I know did not go to college.
2
@Leo-1t1tp not all women but a disturbing percentage
2
That's a great response
2
 @SpaceCadet4Jesus I'm very very long post describing speculation
1
@sandrajohn9837 people's chronological age is never irrelevant.
1
@sandrajohn9837 they're not adults yet either. There a college kids. It almost think that you never knew any or that you're a kid yourself
1
@sandrajohn9837 they have the right to vote but they never should have been given the right to vote it should be 21. I'm sorry you can say whatever you want but I remember being in college and most of my friends weren't competent to warm up Franks and beans. You're beginning to bore me
1
@glennwatson3313 agh lectures from my intellectual inferiors one of my favorite things. Snooze
1
@sandrajohn9837 people still have a lot of growing up to do after 21 but the amount of growth between 18 and 21 is pretty remarkable.
1
@stevendouglas3781 freedom of speech has certain distinct limits. They're pretty much limited to restrictions to speech that would cause imminent harm to others like the child in this instance. An imminent harm does not include hurt feelings
1
 @stevendouglas3781 people who believe in free speech do not believe in exceptions for people that they don't agree with. You don't really understand free speech at all
1
@stevendouglas3781 that would be a case that would cause imminent harm to a child the only constitutionally acceptable restrictions on Free speech are those that would cause harm to other people and that means imminent harm
1
 @stevendouglas3781 your example is not a very good one because everyone on Earth agrees that that can cause imminent harm to a child
1
 @ProfYaffle they don't seem to understand that it's to speak that they hate that needs the most protection
1
 @BertPreast obvious
1
 @Benzknees yes it was a bad thing and that is precisely the kind of oppression that led to the Russian revolution.
1
@stevendouglas3781 exceptions to free speech under the First amendment are not based on people's worldview. The only lawful exceptions are speech that poses an imminent harm to others like crying fire in a crowded theater or inciting a riot. You should probably understand this before you post on the subject
1
 @robinthrush9672 well you are physically capable of yelling fire in a crowded theater however expected to be arrested prosecuted and convicted endangering people's lives.
1
 @eugenetswong commercial speech as opposed to political speech has a much lower standard of protection.
1
 @stevendouglas3781 the left wing desire to express Free speech doesn't have anything to do with the fact that adults are not allowed to solicit children sexually
1
@stevendouglas3781 in the United States of America opposite worldviews heaven living side-by-side since the founding. No restrictions on Free speech are allowed with the obvious caveat excluding speech that can lead to imminent harm of others. No viewpoint censorship is allowed
1
I can answer that hubris @stevendouglas3781
1
@ryananderson5202 when I see some full saying okay Boomer what I always think is what they should be saying okay person with much more education accomplishments and knowledge than me. In all healthy societies at least some difference is shown towards the elderly it's a sign that we live in a sick society and old people are attacked. It's really the actions of losers
1
 @stevendouglas3781 what point are you even trying to make
1
@stevendouglas3781 yawn
1
 @ccreature7086 funny my dad says that all the time. He is 101 1/2
1
 @jonathanjones3126 that's true but those things used to be a little more closely aligned than they are today
1
@ccreature7086 funny because my dad said the same thing all my life. Spent yesterday afternoon with him decorating his tree he's 101 and a half
1
@Andre_Thomasson it's been a while since I did any programming. Used to write complex corporate systems (I was in the Actuarial department and besides the fact that systems had a queue that we could not wait for we discovered that it was a lot easier to teach actuaries to program than to teach programmers to be actuaries). But then I got people who took care of that and then I got people who had people that took care of that and with the speed with witch technology changes I became completely dependent on my staff. At that point the company didn't want me spending my time banging the keyboards anyway. Now I'm retired I'm so technologically behind the times it's ridiculous.
1
@Andre_Thomasson I used to know that I just forgot it. My day is being the guy that wrote the code were over nearly 30 years ago. I was still an analytical guru but I assigned the programming to other people
1
@juniperstardust5549 he is a bigot he just hates different people
1