Comments by "Lewis Smith" (@lewissmith350) on "KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@7n154 as in my experience that is not so. But even then, for most things, I think it's ok for women to choose to be police officers, or such, and there should be qualifications you need to pass. Some women and some men will pass these. But it's not fair to demand that womens sports have biological males in their events, if we have women's sports, it's unfair to have people not born women, in those events, its a unfair competitive advantage. I am not saying no women are good at sports, I am sure the best wnba players, and javelin throwers would beat many men, but I think having men in the women's events is a unfair advantage. You raise interesting questions, but I think the needle can be threaded quite easily to accepting biological differences, and allowing women to have rights as well. Though yes, I think some roles like combat soldiers are more suited to biological males, I can understand there being a argument for some exceptional women passing the tests, to serve in these exceptional fields, and no doubt there are plenty of women who would do better at the navy seals tests, than me at my peak, but yes thats a thing where i hope operational realities are considered highest. Not pure political correctness, I bet hr McMaster would have it right on that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1