Comments by "Raju" (@rajx7120) on "BJP's rumblings over UP loss, questions on Yogi, call for ‘Sangathan over Sarkar’ as PM steps in" video.

Yogi has performed well. Law and order improvement is due to Yogi. Could KP Maurya have done, even ine encounter? And also get investments from Davos? Atmost give Maurya some important portfolios, but Yogi should not be removed. Good performance must be rewarded.
4
 @A_41595 Exactly, this is a racist comment by BJP haters, to create anti-Gujarat narrative.
3
Devious racist comment to create artificial division!
1
@Shivakumar-td4cz In Karnataka, BSY is not allowing non-Lingayat leaders to grow. BJP wants to woo other communities as well. Similarly, in UP maybe there is perception of Yogi being pro-Thakur, despite good performance. And KP Maurya could bring backward caste votes also.
1
@delmanpronto9374 Apart from Gujarat, even Tamil Nadu got investment, who doesn't even vote BJP. So, this parochialism logic doesn't checkout.
1
@delmanpronto9374 Govt has no control over where the foreign company invests it's projects. Uddhav Thackeray was also CM for a couple of years. His opposition to bullet train and encouraging farm loan waivers might have spooked foreign investors. And please tell me which critical infrastructure has been bought by Adani? Adani bough loss making ports in smaller cities. Not any critical ones. Maharashtra's real problem is there is a sugarcane lobby, that is trapping farmers into growing water-guzzling sugarcane, at the cost of other crops. This is causing drought situation. Most of the sugarmills are owned by NCP politicians. Lot of money is being sunk in this nexus.
1
@delmanpronto9374 Then how did Tamil Nadu get the investment? Please explain that. I would like to think political instability, and policy instability in Maharashtra may also be a factor. One govt approves bullet train, and the next one cancels it. There is politics over even a simple metro shed. Don't you think, foreign investors are going to avoid these drama, and go to a stable state like Gujarat? Maybe, they see policy stability in Tamil Nadu too, despite changing DMK and AIADMK. Think about these causes too.
1
@Shivakumar-td4cz Okay. Thanks for the reply. But BJP generally doesn't like one family taking over a party. And public also expects that from them. It's a key differentiator. Maybe, if BSY son, is not head, they wouldn't mind. BJP's behaviour is often wierd. Apparently, they try to make it competitive for everyone, even if it means losing an election. But if BJP is taken over by one family, then I will never support them.
1