Comments by "Raju" (@rajx7120) on "Sheikh Hasina's stay in Delhi won't be a 'deal-breaker' between India u0026 Bangladesh: Avinash Paliwal" video.

First Bangladesh should chose an elected govt. An interim govt, from a coup can't be considered legitimate. We aren't even sure of rule of law, in Bangladesh, rt now.
4
@1234sajed China makes all kinds of unproven allegations against Dalai Lama. That doesn't make it true. First Bangladesh should elect a govt, through proper democratic means. Which means there should be a proper opposition too. For all we know, a bunch of mobs overthrew Hasina in a coup. We can't accept demands of a mob. After electing a govt, Sheikh Hasina should be properly tried and convicted, and then India can consider. And extraditions generally have conditions like, there shall be no capital punishment etc.
2
Why should we trust an interim govt that came through a coup? First, elections should be held.
1
First elect a govt. Mobs have no right to make demands.
1
First Bangladesh should get an elected govt and PM. Whether Hasina is a dictator or not, the current Yunus govt is not elected either. Let there be elections first. Coups can't be legitimized. We don't see any rule of law, in Bangladesh, rt now. Violence is still prevalent. We see mob rule, forcing resignation of teachers and principals. Religious minorities are being attacked.
1
An interim govt that came through a coup is not more legitimate than Sheikh Hasina, who won the elections for all we know. So, first elections should happen. Then a proper legal trial should happen. Conviction should happen. We are nowhere, near any of this. Demand of a mob can't be accepted as demand of the people.
1