Comments by "Василий Ломовой" (@user-sj6iz8fi2w) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. @paulwolf3302Your source sucks. Do you really believe this guy when he tells you that Ukraine, with the help of a group of 60 people in Krynki, tried to seize Crimea? T his is ridiculous. As for normal sources, the Ukrainian Armed Forces from October 2023 to July 2024 lost from 1042 to 1104 people in the battles for Krynki. The bodies of at least 788 of them remained on the left bank and in the river. They are on the list of missing persons. The Ukrainian army lost from 311 to 361 on the river and the right bank while trying to supply Krynki and evacuate the wounded, as well as when transferring reinforcements. The Russian Armed Forces lost in Krynki from October 2023 to July 2, 2024 from 6,700 to 7,200 people killed and missing. Russian losses in equipment amounted to 279 units (infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, MT LB, tanks, MLRS, self-propelled guns) and about 40 towed artillery guns were destroyed by Ukrainian counter-battery fighting and drone strikes
    1
  2. @paulwolf3302 The fact that Russia sucks so much is funny.
    1
  3. Because this guy is making disasters out of Ukrainian successes. For example, in Krynki, Russia lost 200 pieces of equipment and 6 thousand people, against a little more than a thousand Ukrainians. This pro-Russian propagandist twisted such a great victory as if it were a disaster for Ukraine, and then you wonder why Ukraine didn’t fall, lol.
    1
  4. Putin has never proposed a peace agreement. Only surrender.
    1
  5. Ukraine has hundreds of Krynoks, in which the loss ratio is 1 Ukrainian to 6 Russians? This is the best news of the week. Alas, in reality, the ratio of losses at the front as a whole is 1 Ukrainian to 2.5 Russians.
    1
  6.  @zlatkokovach7862  Consider me more of a skeptic :3 The fact is that regardless of the exact ratio of losses = this is a victory for Ukraine.
    1
  7.  @bluikkso  Krynki is the most successful operation in terms of loss ratio during the entire war. What surprises you about the numbers? The fact that an absolutely incompetent blogger made a video full of nonsense, and you believed him?
    1
  8. Why are you afraid? What's so scary about this?
    1
  9. It’s not even close, different goals. Ukraine had no goals to advance; these were DRGs of 60-80 people. How many people took part in that landing? I think much more.
    1
  10.  @dannydanny2789  Let me explain, Ukraine broke through to the weakly fortified positions of the weakened Russian front with the help of first 30 people, then 60 Marines and gained a foothold by installing correction equipment and antenna amplifiers for drones. RUSSIA STARTED STORMING THESE POSITIONS, TIME AFTER TIME RUSSIA DROPPED PEOPLE TRYING TO KICK THE UKRAINIAN DRG FROM THE KRYNOKI, but they adjusted artillery and drones against them. The best drone unit of Ukraine - the Birds of Magyar - worked in this direction, and all the artillery that tried to hit the Ukrainian troops in the tanks was calculated using artillery radars, the data was transmitted to the Ukrainian artillery, which was on the other side of the river and was applied to the Russian artillery hit. As a result, Russia lost almost 6 thousand people (wounded and killed), 200 pieces of equipment (armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, MTLBs) and 40 pieces of artillery as a result of INFRACTIVE STORMS. And only when Russia STOPPED trying to storm Krynki, and sent aircraft to bomb them, did the Ukrainian soldiers simply evacuate from there. The question is, how could Ukraine lose more under such conditions? There's simply no way. As soon as they started losing more, they simply retreated.
    1