Comments by "foil hat" (@foilhat1138) on "Ukraine says deep drone strike destroys rare Russian Su-57 stealth fighter" video.

Calling the SU57 a 5th gen fighter is being very generous.
25
It would be if Russia would actually spend money on hangars. That would detract from the yacht fund though.
20
@carphotography Chechnya had a population of only slightly over one million and even they beat Russia.
12
@israelnavarro7182 Normal countries have ground stealth technology. It's called 'hangars'. Of course if you pay for hangars it means fewer yachts.
10
@clownN.N Putin: "In just two weeks time Russian troops could gain control of Kyiv and do it easily." Russia 1 TV: "And Kyiv will be taken so quickly, in a day and a half or three days." "Two days and the fall of the city." "It is understood that in a hot wr we would defeat Ukraine in two days, what's there to defeat, Jesus its Ukraine. We suppressed those firing points we were talking about in the commercial and that's it" "We'll raise an eyebrow and Ukraine will understand everything, no need for any preludes, we'll take Kyiv."
9
@sasobrume6866 They hit it on the ground, did you even watch the video? Russian sources have confirmed this.
9
Russia is using dirt bikes and golf carts bud.
7
It has the same radar cross section as an F18.
6
@ubermind-tim I think his comment went over your head.
6
@clownN.N who own's Russia 1 tv? You can just search the quotes, they aren't top secret.
6
neither do golf carts.
5
@israelnavarro7182 These were cheap drones made in Ukraine, the targeting was done with commercially available satellites. Normal countries don't go around trying to invade and annex their neighbors.
5
Tell that to Russian sources, they say it was damaged.
4
@ubermind-tim lmao, ok buddy. Let me know when you get his joke.
4
@PerceivedREALITY999 Why not search "Russian sources say SU57 damaged" instead of posting foolish comments?
4
Russian sources said it was damaged.
3
@PerceivedREALITY999 So why is it still sitting in the same spot? After previous airport attacks Russia moved all their aircraft. Almost like there is serious damage.
3
@JOSEPH.STOLEN-ELECTION It was Russian sources that said it was perforated by shrapnel.
2
@israelnavarro7182 These were Ukrainian drones built in Ukraine, the SU57's were visible with commercially available satellites. It's time to rejoin reality bud.
2
@israelnavarro7182 Russia began its invasion in 2014, there were no problems in the Donbas prior to that. Moreover the far right party in Ukraine got less than one percent of the vote in the prior election, get a grip.
2
@shurikello Who owns Russia 1? Do you know how google works? Search Putin says he can take Kyiv in two weeks.
2
@Noconstitutionfordemocrats1 They've only managed to build a handful over a decade. It's even more difficult now with sanctions.
2
@PerceivedREALITY999 Russian sources say it was damaged.
2
Russian sources were saying it was perforated by shrapnel.
1
@israelnavarro7182 These were cheaply made drones manufactured in Ukraine, the targeting was done with commercially available satellites.
1
@Noconstitutionfordemocrats1 They've managed to build only a few in over a decade.
1
@vitoriaguimaraes6241 Lmao, Soviet tactics are to park a jet in Tunguska for thirty years and hope it sill works. Underground hangars, that's actually hilarious.
1
It was Russian sources that said it was perforated by shrapnel. Dry your eyes ok.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 The pro-Russian Fighterbomber Telegram channel, which often writes about aviation losses and has deep connections to Russian Aerospace Forces, confirmed one SU57 was hit. “The Su-57 was damaged by shrapnel; it is now being determined whether it can be restored or not.”
1