Comments by "Tony England" (@TonyEnglandUK) on "Richard Dawkins vs Piers Morgan On Religion and Gender | The Full Interview" video.

There are moments where the stare seems to be Richard thinking "What species is this in front of me?"
21
I watched the whole interview and noticed Richard Dawkins was rarely allowed to finish anything he was attempting to say.
19
Piers Morgan asks the questions that he can't wait to give HIS answer to.
18
@flipf615 Aw are we attacking your boyfriend, flip 🤣
7
@andrewdouglas1963 Then it would be more productive if you presented that evidence instead of just proclaiming it.
7
@andrewdouglas1963 And remember, the claims of Jesus are simply claims in a book you read, your evidence for their occurrence goes no further than you read it in a book.
7
I found this whole interview a relentless struggle between waiting to hear what the Professor was going to say and waiting for the exact moment Piers Morgan prevented him getting there.
5
@lenderuiter8916 Whoa, stop right there please. Apart from you read it in a book, what evidence can you show that dismisses all other gods and proves your god created the universe, as you claim?
5
@lenderuiter8916 You've got to stop making claims that have no evidence attached to prove those claims are true. You are making incredible claims but the evidence attached to them is nil. And I suspect you know it is.
5
And equally: Piers: "Have we lost the ability to think logically and critically about things?" Richard: "Well, some people may have."
4
@Not.Satoshi I'm not wholly convinced that Piers Morgan experiences reality beyond ensuring he isn't wearing odd socks.
2
@flipf615 lol, no. No you didn't. You're very wrong. You may want to check your research. 😅
2
@Thatguy99991 I've read the Bible. It is probably the most incredible and lamentable poppycock ever compiled into bookform.
2
@andrewdouglas1963 "Claims are evidence in themselves" Of course they're not. A claim given to police will be investigated to find evidence of the claim's truth. Until such evidence is found, the claim remains nothing more than a claim. A court of law will explain the difference between claims and evidence.
2
@andrewdouglas1963 Without typing anything but a full, direct and conclusive answer, what is your response to this question... Apart from you read it in a book, what evidence can you present that dismisses all other gods and proves your god created the universe?
2
@andrewdouglas1963 Sir, stop answering questions with questions. Answer mine first. Then I'll answer yours. You're deflecting and you know you are. Answer my question directly please. Then I'll answer yours with equal directness.
2
@andrewdouglas1963 Here it is again. (Just as a reminder) Apart from you read it in a book, what evidence can you provide that dismisses all other gods and proves your god created the universe?
2
If god really did exist surely Piers Morgan wouldn't.
2
@tc6070 You're quoting from a book as if that proves a belief. Remember - all you are really doing is quoting from an old book.
2
@ And you're spamming this same message everywhere. And spamming is breaking YouTube laws. And your own religion forbids you from ever breaking laws
2
When discussing religion, "nailed it" is an interesting choice of descriptive words.
1
Because those are the precise moments PM's brain was going "huh?"
1
@andrewdouglas1963 Well your comment isn't showing except in my notifications but I'll respond to it here. 1) "Something existing rather than nothing is best explained by God." Something existing rather than nothing is best explained by Martians. 2) Appeal to authority. Einstein called the Bible "Primitive legend" and Christianity (and all other 10,000 religions) _"childish superstition". 3) Abiogenesis is an unproven theory but there have been many advances in research and to somehow claim that it is impossible equates to your god being the real answer is simply fulfilling the God of the Gaps argument. 4) "Jesus was the only person who has ever lived who performed real miracles and rose from the dead." This is simply incorrect. History is littered with gods who allegedly rose from the dead and Buddhism will correct your claim that only Jesus performed miracles.
1
@andrewdouglas1963 Claims are not evidence in themselves. There's a purple unicorn that exists in Russia who will, without question, rule the world one day. See?
1