Comments by "Silly Sad" (@sillysad3198) on "PragerU" channel.

  1. how about asking for consent before EACH friction? it could become a rape in between of two consequent friction, as far as i understood.
    1
  2. no. republicans are DIFFERENT. unlike democrats who are all the same and equally as stupid as christians.
    1
  3. > Religious can be on both sides. it is pretty abnormal for religious to be politically right and for atheists to be on the left. because the political left takes religious type of "thinking", and sometimes lefty doctrines are religions of their own.
    1
  4. > Liberals are left, Conservatves are right first, of all "Liberals" is a misnomer. Conservatives are LIBERAL (here and now) Lefties by-definition are trying to establish tyranny by gradually expanding the state. There are MORE THAN ONE WAY to do so: Welfare state, regulation of every fart "for social justice"; or Theocratic state, regulation of every fart "for god". BOTH WAYS ARE WAYS TO THE LEFT. democrats AND republicans ARE LEFT -- THEY WANT TYRANNY. > atheists tending toward left its a lie. atheists tend to think, and therefore always tend AGAINST TYRANNY, i.e. right. atheists reject all religions, including communism.
    1
  5. +csaba toth play on words.
    1
  6. +Izzy half man, half bear, and half pig
    1
  7. Before PragerU I thought that the biggest evil on earth is left-wing media.
    1
  8. > Some of the greatest cruelty can be born from empathy. evolution does not work with "some" , it works with "slightly better".
    1
  9. > you're saying it's wrong to kill people ...because it feels bad? NO. i do not know what do you mean "wrong" therefore i can not say that.
    1
  10. > So you're saying it's wrong to kill people ...because it feels bad? more accurately i am saying that: you think that killing people is "wrong" because it FEELS WRONG TO YOU. if it doesn't, then you are a psychopath, my congratulations to you!
    1
  11. Professor, why did you omit the foundation stone of global warming: the definition of the "mean temperature" They do NOT define "mean" at all -- this fact alone renders all mentions of the "mean temperature" completely meaningless. I believe someone HAS TO address this issue. Why not you? P.S. there is, by the way, a straightforward method to measure the greenhouse effect directly (and the contribution made by CO2 in particular) -- all you need is to launch a spectroscope high above earth's orbit and measure the "temperature" the same way we do it with other planets.
    1
  12. oh! this imbecile again! unsubscribe.
    1
  13. I have no idea what is "a valid argument" -- i only speak about the particular truth value of the Prage'r statement. The statement is TRUE: from false fallows false. Does this statement give us any information? NO. You can call it "an invalid argument"
    1
  14. wow! i didn't know they experimented with communism!
    1
  15. +Sam Doo > Prager University is about sharing views not always expressed in the media. this particular fallacy is overly represented everywhere! +Sam Doo > They intend to make videos you're going to disagree with. fine, as long as those are not fallacious. by posting this particular video they undermine their credibility and laterally damaged other speakers on PragerU's platform. +Sam Doo > take it or leave it and move on. if this happens to be my first encounter with PragerU then i would ignore them and miss plenty of intelligent speakers, they in turn would miss some of their audience, being repelled by this indoctrinated imbecile.
    1
  16. > Even with modern translations, the content of that book is a joke. let alone the fact that translations magically vary... i suspect it is the undercover work of the christian god!
    1
  17. > Science can't point us to truth until it stops changing. religion is changing all the time and even exist in over 9000 mutually exclusive variants at any time. how can religion point to the truth then?
    1
  18. > Science can't point us to truth until it stops changing. religion is changing all the time and even exist in over 9000 mutually exclusive variants at any time. how can religion point to the truth then?
    1
  19. > truth NEVER CHANGES, holy scriptures do.
    1
  20. > Truth is not absolute. Truth is subjective and changeable. > I just demonstrated that someone has to apply for Nobel prize. the biggest discovery in the history of science. the laws of physics HAVE CHANGED at one time in the observed past. -- THIS IS HUGE! do not restrict yourself to youtube comments! SPREAD THE NEWS! WIN THE NOBEL PRIZE!
    1
  21. > Bible is not a holy scripture discuss it with Prager, please :)
    1
  22. +FacelessDeviant > I doubt absolute truth exists. then you should stop talking. because without this assumption we are all voices in your head, and you have no means to assess the truthfulness of your statements -- all your statements are EQUALLY meaningless in the absence of the absolute truth to relate to.
    1
  23. > "Absolute truth" and "assumption" don't really mix, do they? you are a moron.
    1
  24. yes, yes, keep talking how evil is putin, while american banks keep putin's wealth safe and putin's family enjoy citizenship of europe.
    1
  25. i don't know if to laugh or cry on those BS excuses? how many millennia we hear all the same story: "I DIDN'T KNOW!"
    1
  26. George Carlin has already made this point. Still i like your speech very much.
    1
  27. what a horrible doublethink! MUCH WORSE THAN 1984!!!
    1
  28. +Shooting Range Productions it is not your resources to care about. ok?
    1
  29. this liar was repeatedly exposed, still he returns with the exactly same lies.
    1