Comments by "Martin Tyson" (@marktyler3381) on "Dawn Butler believes that she belongs to a different and superior race to white Europeans" video.

  1. Dawn Butler is a disgrace.
    345
  2.  @WWilson-d9m  It pays well. Who needs morals when you get 80k for a three day week?
    15
  3.  @WWilson-d9m  I am a musician, I got a lift home from a black DEI guy, that actually drove irratically when I questioned the nature of that job. He won't speak to me now. Why? Because I don't support his grift.
    12
  4. The original hominins came from Africa, but the dawn of modern humans didn't come from Africa necessarily. The elephant in the room is, although we bred with neanderthals and Denisovans, they bred with "archaic Africans" which were separated by at least 90,000 years. Probably Homo habilis. Explains a lot
    11
  5. In her video, she said first ones, with an image from north africa of the earliest human found, not sub saharan africa
    5
  6. @CristiNeagu  Yes, I'll accept that as reasonable
    2
  7.  @CristiNeagu  It's a continued mystery in truth, but let's set a few guidelines. The 40,000 "great leap forward" is dubious at best now. But I think it's a reasonable benchmark for Europe. However anatomically modern humans have been around for at least 100,000 years. Is that an acceptable timeframe?
    2
  8.  @TruthTellert63  No, sub Saharan Africans had nothing to do with any of that.
    2
  9.  @davidboult4143  We can trace genetics, but it isn't as helpful as it appears. For instance we know that humanity nearly died out 70,000 years ago with the Toba explosion. Geneticists suggest that we were reduced down to perhaps 2000 humans. By why would a mega eruption in Indonesia affect humans so much?
    1
  10.  @MushMushMuscovaMush  Why what, sorry?
    1
  11. @CristiNeagu  Yes, but where to draw the line? And is that even a question that makes sense? But anatomically modern humans went around the world breeding with other human species within that timeframe
    1
  12. @davidboult4143  No. You just don't understand the conversation
    1
  13.  @davidboult4143  Speciation is apparent amongst humans. Australians got there by boat 60,000 years ago. That shows ingenuity. But what most people don't know is Aboriginal people have a 25% denser visual cortex and 25% greater visual acuity. Abos can see, far better than everyone else
    1
  14.  @CristiNeagu  True, but I'm just trying a work within accepted parameters. Within the last 100,000 years many massive changes have occurred
    1
  15. A line isn't necessary, but discussing the last 100,000 years might be fruitful
    1