Youtube comments of (@kreogei).

  1. Zelensky couldnt help starting an argument with Vance. Zelensky was the immature one.
    44
  2. Because it incentivize the US to protect Ukraine in other ways. Set a symbol as bessent said. Economic security evolves into military security. Also its a resource rights deal not just giving them away, the Ukrainian people would still benefit from investment into their country and get half of the profits.
    42
  3. Economic security lead ot military security it was a step in tying Ukraine to America which incentivizes america to defend Ukraine.
    33
  4. Zelensky literally started it.
    13
  5. Zelensky started it.
    12
  6. Zelensky did try to ambush vance first.
    9
  7. Zelensky started the debate with vance. This was not the place for that kind of conversation.
    7
  8. Zelensky started the argument. He only has himself to blame.
    7
  9. Russia went in with 150K troops. The intention was not to occupy the country it was to send a message to the Ukrainians and pressure them into a deal. If a deal was not acheived Russia was going take want they want by force (which is not, nor ever was, the whole of Ukraine). It is simple minded to say Russia went in with the intention of conquering the whole country with force. Russia was actually the smaller force for the first year of the war! If you argue that Russia was stupid enough to think they could sit on the whole country with 150K troops you are severely underestimating the intellgience of the Russians. Russia's economy was almost entirely self-suffcient before the invasion. It was stupid of the west to think sanctions would work long term. Unlike Russia, China's eocnomy is massively dependent on global trade. Equivalent sanctions on China would actually work and create decades of economic problems for China but also the rest of the world would feel it too. Saying Chinas military power is greater than russias is incredibly ignorant. This doesnt mean China's military doesnt have the potential to be greater than Russia but as of now Russia's military is by far more powerful than Chinas. If you were to reverse the roles of NATO and Russia in the this war, NATO would not have performed much better against a Russian backed Ukraine than Russia has thus far. Russia avoided attacking civilian infrastructure for the opening 8 months of the war because they wanted a deal, not to occupy the whole country or play an attrition war. They changed their approach to a war of attrition in Q4 2022. Russia's goal in the opening was to force Ukraine to make a deal but now its to either get an unconditional surrender or to forcfully take what they want (everything up to the dnipro and the black sea coast) and sit on the line of contact until Ukraine gives it up (treaty of some sort). Im not sure if you were saying those ignornant things in the opening of the interview to build rapport with interviewee or not but I thought you would know better.
    7
  10. He started arguing in a venue where that type of conversation is inappropiate and he knew better.
    6
  11. Wrong. Zelensky started the arugment, he attempted to ambush vance on tv.
    4
  12. Zelensky started the argument with vance
    4
  13. Zelensky started it. He ambushed Vance first.
    2
  14. Economic security turns into military security.
    2
  15. Zelensky started the arugment not vance.
    2
  16. And Zelensky. He also has a background as an entertainer.
    2
  17. Zelensky started the argument in an attempt to ambush vance.
    2
  18. It was a step.
    2
  19. This was not the venue for that kind of conversation. He attempted ot ambush vance.
    2
  20. Zelesnky started the debate with vance. This is not the venue for that kind of conversation. Zelensky put himself in this pickle.
    2
  21. Zelensky started the debate.
    2
  22. Zelensky is not an equal.
    2
  23. NATO is designed to subjugate europe as much as to protect it.
    1
  24. Its a first step.
    1
  25. Zelensky does the same to other leaders.
    1
  26. He started the debate, he tried ambushing vance on tv wether malicious or not he did.
    1
  27. Every day that goes by gets worse for Ukraine. Russia is demonstrably winning the attrition war. Ukraine has no cards to play. They have to capitulate.
    1
  28. There was. Zelensky is an entertainer he revels in this kind of chaos just like Trump.
    1
  29. The US does hold all the cards over Ukraine.
    1
  30. Not that simple.
    1
  31. There are plenty of examples.
    1
  32. Trump would be perfectly happy with this. Its an excuse for Trump to walk away from supporting Ukraine.
    1
  33. It not an issue with just Trump. It the problem with any deal with the USA. Dont trust the US.
    1
  34. Zelensky started it.
    1
  35. Yes. USA wants something to fight for.
    1
  36. The goverment need to stop crowding out the private market. Banks dont have the balance sheet space to invest in the people with regulation limiting their growth and forcing them to buy government debt.
    1
  37. Hes incredibly uninteresting. I had high hopes given the rumours but he is so dull.
    1
  38. No Zelensky ambushed vance first.
    1
  39. Zelensky started this clown show by starting the argument.
    1
  40. Its just an excuse to walk away from Ukraine. It rhetoric.
    1
  41. No, other way around.
    1
  42. Canada is not a real country. Only french canada and natives have a real culture. The rest of canada is just an extension of the USA.
    1
  43. Other way around. Zelensky attempted to ambush vance first.
    1
  44. All politicians are bullys/gangsters. The fight for the interests of their people.
    1
  45. Thats one way to destroy their relationship with Russia.
    1
  46. This is all part of it. Theatrics is part of the deal. Zelensky and Trump are both entertainers they revel in this.
    1
  47. Zelensky also has also been insulting Trump and other world leaders. Also all politicians are gangsters. They fight for their people interests.
    1
  48. No, Zelensky attempted to ambush vance first.
    1
  49. based
    1
  50. Good luck. He is losing the real war against Russia. The war of attrition is demonstably is Russia favor.
    1
  51. Zelensky started the argument not vance.
    1