Comments by "Laurence Fraser" (@laurencefraser) on "Why the Glass Bottle FAILED" video.

Depends on the deisgn of the bottle. Plenty of them will just flat out bounce (though not very far) if you drop them from any half way reasonable height... provided you don't then drop a heavy thing (such as the entire rest of the case of bottles) on top of them. Now, if you start Throwing them at things, that's a whole other story...
4
Someone ends up with the deposit money that you didn't get back. The money isn't 'lost', but you, individually, are out of pocket (in that you didn't get your deposit back nor actually gain anything in exchange for paying that money), and have thus 'made a loss'. Who, exactly, ends up with that money depends on how the system is set up, though yes, it does probably end up with the company making the product. Where you're going wrong is the assumption that the manufacturer comes out ahead ('makes a profit') by keeping the deposit. In reality they don't, because now they have to make a replacement bottle instead, which, with glass bottles, costs them quite a bit more than paying you the deposit amount would have... that's the entire point of the deposit system, it's cheaper for the manufacturer than just making new bottles all the time. So they're actually spending MORE money if you don't claim your deposit... that's a 'loss' for Them, too, not something that helps their profits. ... well, Technically they made a larger profit on the specific bottle they sold you, but they made a smaller profit (by quite a bit more), or even a loss depending on how the numbers shake out, on the next bottle of drink they sell that Would have gone in the bottle you had, had you retuned it, and must now instead go in a much more expensive (for them) new bottle instead. That's not them coming out ahead, and so by most logic is not considered a profit for them. (Actually, I suspect it works a lot like the Goods and Services Tax here, where the retailor records how many bottles they sold and how many deposits they repaid and then pay or are paid the balance for the month/year by the company. Businesses tend to prefer systems like that rather than individual per item/event transactions when they can manage it).
3
@franciscovessani6720 ... smoking is inherently unsafe to those Around you, nevermind what it does to the person doing the smoking. Also, nicotine is both adictive and poisonous... and when you look at the ingredients list for cigarettes? it contains a LOT of extra chemical additives, with a surprising overlap with Rocket Fuel (also toxic to humans), many of which designed specifically to make them More addictive.
3
@Shadowninja1200 To my recollection, Amazon's return system is 'stick it in the regular mail system, we'll toss it in the nearest landfil when it gets to us'.
2
@bite-sizedshorts9635 That is very bad...but is it true of other drinks? because coke is Notorious for being just generally a terrible chemical that reacts badly with pretty much everything anyway. Including the humans ingesting it, mind you. (did you know that coke contains a high enough concentration of sugar that your body reacts to it as a poison and would make you vomit to purge it before it could get further than your stomach...were it not for the fact that coke also contains a chemical Explicitly To Suppress That Reflex?)
1