General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Cáit, Oz Astráil, MsSpock
Sky News Australia
comments
Comments by "Cáit, Oz Astráil, MsSpock" (@msvulcanspock) on "Donald Trump defies judge and gives courtroom speech in civil fraud trial" video.
No the judge wasn't biased, he offered Trump accommodations that no person who was not as rich and powerful as Trump would EVER be offered. And he published those extra accommodations on the court website. A ordinary person would have been been in jail months ago for making such threats. Trump was treated with kid gloves.
5
No other defendant in the USA is allowed to speak in summation if they have legal counsel. (Discussed widely in the US) The judge made special exceptions for Trump. Through email with counsel the judge allowed three opportunities for Trump to agree to not lie, bring up irrelevant information, threaten or give a campaign speech. Trump's counsel missed all three deadlines. This was posted on the court website for all to see. Why wasn't these emails part of your news video so both sides could be examined? Three times Trump was offered this extraordinary opportunity to speak within guidelines (like not threatening court workers) and he would not agree not to lie, give misinformation or not do a campaign speech. The judge discusses this at length in the emails which Sky could have gotten off the court website. Trump's lawyers didn't check the box for the jury trial. Anyone else who behaved like Trump did would have been in jail months ago. Definitely a two tiered justice system. One for the rich and one for everyone else. The statute Trump was being prosecuted under didn't require harm, a victim or intent, so Sky is misrepresenting the actual court case proceedings themselves.
5
Trump chose not to go on the stand. That was his call.
4
This judge bent over backwards for Trump. An normal person would never get to speak in summation, if they have counsel. The judge offered three opportunities for Trump to agree to not threaten or give a campaign speech. He would not agree. These emails are available to be read on the court's website.
1
@kevinsullivan7831 No other defendant in the USA is allowed to speak in summation if they have legal counsel. Trump chose not to go on the stand. This judge made many special exceptions for Trump. Through email with counsel the judge allowed three opportunities for Trump to agree to not lie, bring up irrelevant information, threaten or give a campaign speech. Trump's counsel missed all three deadlines. This was posted on the court website for all to see. Trump's lawyers didn't check the box for the jury trial. Anyone else who behaved like Trump did would have been in jail months and months ago. One justice system for the rich and one for everyone else.
1