Comments by "Stephen Hendricks" (@stephenhendricks103) on "" video.

Sorry, Joe. Like most Mazdas the CX-3 offers attractive styling. But I simply don't understand the appeal of these mainstream "hatchbacks on stilts," especially when they offer so little actual UTILITY. With a maximum of 44.3 cubic feet, the CX-3 has less overall cargo space than a VW Golf (53.7 cubic ft). Want to use the cargo space behind the second row? The CX-3 provides a maximum of 12.4 cubic feet of cargo space versus the Golf's 17.4 cubic feet. Looking for the best gas mileage? The Golf is rated at 29-37 vs the Mazda's 29-34.
5
@ztekz It's not a case of "driv(ing) everday loaded with cargo." It's a question of versatility. There are hatchbacks with better driving dynamics and hatchbacks with more room. What you get in the CX-3 is a vehicle that claims to be a sport UTILITY vehicle but doesn't live up to the label.
1
@ztekz I think we're saying much the same thing. As I said, the CX-3 is a "hatchback on stilts." Not the best hatchback and certainly not the best SUV in its class.The difference in our point of view is you put a positive spin on the CX-3 while I don't think it measures up.
1