Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. Oops. It seems Inside Edition left out a few facts: - Timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released (FOIA request). Nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead. - Multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match this sob story about nobody being around. - She served a felony prison term in Florida about 6 years ago. She had a long list of other arrests before and after. Drugs and alcohol. Stealing cars. Failures to appear. Other thefts. You name it. - She abandoned her career and family over a decade ago, including a husband and a 6 month old son (and another son) in favor of living a life of crime and drugs. - Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private extras" for cash with a parade of men in her apartment. If she was someone who was easily "shamed," she sure picked a strange career path. - She never showed up at court for this arrest, which seems to have been her usual way of handling her other arrests, given her warrants for failures to appear. She attempted to change her name a few times to evade the police, but, the courts wouldn't let her, due to her criminal history. I guess "innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" goes viral. And, they crafted this story a few months ago, long after she died, but didn't mention she was already dead. That way, they got a 2nd viral round by posting the "update" that she had killed herself, and let the public believe that the arrest was the cause. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting arrested, gets arrested again, and kills herself a year later for unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral, after all. I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to whine her way out of her millionth arrest.
    740
  2. Yes, she believed her life was ruined, and ended it. But, if you think it's from this video, you're ridiculously mistaken. She left her career and family behind about a decade ago, because she wanted to leave behind all normalcy, and wanted to live a life of crime and drugs. She served a felony prison term for stealing cars. And, once she got out, she continued her drug and crime spree until the day she died. This particular incident was merely her millionth arrest. And, sorry to inform you, but Inside Edition isn't going to share the timeline of this incident (ruins their false narrative). July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. That's when the big media outlets covered this story... literally 1.5 years after she was already dead. Not only wasn't she shamed by this news story (because she wasn't alive when any major media covered it), but, let's get real here, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. So, I really don't think she was all that embarrassed by being exposed publicly.
    321
  3. Open investigations vs. closed.
    129
  4.  @OmarVazquezEleven11  Thanks for proving you didn't read what I wrote. Bravo.
    59
  5. Yeah, that's a bit confusing, though. I mean, yeah, I agree, it's sad that she had no family or friends that were even looking for her, and her body was left to decay until the landlord went looking for the rent. But, the medical examiner's report says that the last date she was known to be alive was March 19, 2022. Her body was found on March 31, 2022. So, that's not 30 days, that's 12 days. I'm wondering, in retrospect, if the medical examiner's report is simply wrong, and they wrote down the 19th because that was the date of the attempted wellness check, and maybe the medical examiner thought that it came back positive (it didn't).
    55
  6. Oh, well, you're clearly a legal expert, far beyond my level. So, can you explain when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    42
  7. The number of people commenting in this video, falling for this ridiculous setup of a "news" story... it's downright sad. This incident was on July 1, 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023 (Freedom of Information Act request), and had absolutely no "shaming" effect on her, because nobody saw it while she was alive. There were a couple of obscure blogs that posted her mugshot, but, that's not exactly new for her, because she had an arrest record a mile long, and did a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. Multiple people at the beach called the cops for this incident, and one of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It has never been released due to graphic content, but, the arrest report says it was a loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. Inside Edition first aired this story long after her death, but, didn't mention that she was already dead. They apparently wanted a double-whammy of viral videos out of this one, so, in the first version, they didn't tell the audience that she had already been dead for 1.5 years, and then made this "follow up" story to say she's now dead, leaving the audience to believe that it was the first round of press that caused the suicide, and this is the 2nd round of press to talk about that. In reality, there was nearly zero press until long after she was dead. It's ironic (not really) that they say she was a real estate agent, since she hadn't sold a house in over a decade. Her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" in her apartment with a parade of men. Personally, I think she was making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest. She's been busted for drug and alcohol crimes, stealing cars, failures to appear, other thefts, had judgements against her civilly and criminally, and had open warrants. More than a decade ago, she abandoned her family, husband, 6 month old son, and another son, in order to live a life of crime and drugs that her own family said was "off the rails." But, Inside Edition gets more viral views from "innocent soccer mom busted by evil police" than "career criminal who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and kills herself a year later for unrelated reasons." And, the gullible audience gobbles it up like Christmas dinner.
    34
  8. Huh? What "aggression" do you mean, exactly?
    32
  9. OK, but, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. And, then it was the result of a legal FOIA request. How should they prevent it at that point?
    29
  10. What you saw was a media setup. See, the fact is that the woman died nearly 2 years ago. But, yes, a couple of months ago, the arrest video was released to the public. So, the media showed the arrest video without mentioning that she was already dead. Then, they made these new videos a few weeks later for the follow-up story that she killed herself, making people believe that the release of the arrest video is what made her commit suicide. The reality is, however, that she ditched her career and family about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of crime and drugs. She did a felony prison term for stealing cars. And, she had an arrest and judgement record a mile long for various other stuff. And, this arrest probably had very little to do with her suicide. After all, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club, so, I really don't think she felt much "shame" over being exposed to the public.
    29
  11. But, it was never televised anywhere while she was alive. So, what "shame" did she suffer from it after her death?
    25
  12. If you saw this video when it came out, then you saw it when she was already dead for 1.5 years. The arrest video wasn't released to the public until 2.5 years after the arrest, which was 1.5 years after she committed suicide.
    22
  13.  @land1613  She abandoned her career and family over a decade ago in favor a living a life of crime and drugs. She did a felony prison term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She's had a million other arrests. And, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment.
    21
  14. Another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law, eh?
    18
  15. Well, I agree. Shaming her now, after she's dead, is quite unnecessary. At least she didn't suffer from any shame of this video while she was alive.
    18
  16.  @stevensmith8923  Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    16
  17. Yeah, blame the police, not the criminal.
    15
  18. But, that's not what happened here. I'm sorry if you swallow what Inside Edition feeds you. But, when the "news story" consists of asking a bunch of questions that they never answer, and uses deceptive editing and little jump cuts and out-of-context one-sentence clips, yeah, you know you're being manipulated. Arrest = July of 2021. Suicide = March of 2022. Arrest video made public in November of 2023. So, no. It wasn't because of her arrest video being made public. She was dead for more than 1.5 years by the time her arrest video was public. Inside Edition knows this. But, that doesn't go viral. What goes viral is to ask suggestive questions, don't answer those questions, and let gullible people believe nonsense.
    14
  19. How dare they arrest a criminal who committed another crime?!?!?!
    14
  20.  @land1613  Wrong. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023 (FOIA request). There were only a couple of blogs that even mentioned this incident before her death, and they didn't have video, they only had mugshots.
    10
  21. Well, you'll be relieved to learn that she never knew anything about the arrest video going viral, because nobody ever saw it until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    10
  22.  @jayleighc4793  What family? The one she abandoned more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs? What community? Her fellow "dancers" at the gentlemen's club?
    10
  23. I honestly must ask if you're joking or not. She had just put on a public show in front of multiple people including children. Yet, you're trying to say that she should cover up after getting arrested?
    10
  24. And, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years after the event.
    10
  25. No, you should feel guilty for blaming the victims instead of the criminal.
    9
  26. You cannot believe WHO did WHAT to her?
    9
  27. And, what make you think she suffered a speck of humiliation from this? Inside Edition told you what to think, so you went with it? Almost nobody in the media covered it until she was dead 1.5 years.
    8
  28. "Such a beautiful lady" Well, in July of 2021, ok. But, in March of 2022, when she committed suicide, well, read the medical examiner's report. It says that her body weighed 86 pounds, and that her implants were jutting out of her emaciated body in such an unnatural way that really emphasized how unhealthy she was. It seems she really went downhill between 2021 and 2022. "this whole situation must have completely broken her mentally" Let's face reality here... this wasn't exactly her first arrest. And, if she didn't want to get "embarrassed," then what was she doing putting on a beach show, which was recorded by a family, and viewed by the police, who described it as a long and drawn out public display... hardly the "few seconds" that the woman claims. And, how did she really suffer from it? The arrest video wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she died. "I really feel for her family & friends on her loss" But, according to the reports, she had basically abandoned her family and friends. She was last known to be alive on 3/19/2022, and wasn't found until 3/31. How close could those ties have been, if that much time passed and nobody knew she was gone?
    8
  29. I wonder how many people in these comments would express this level of sympathy if Inside Edition actually told the whole story, rather than this concept of "was she shamed to death?" They never actually answer the question, mind you. But, they paint a picture of a sweet soccer mom being carted away by evil police, being shamed in public, who commits suicide because of the publicity. They never say that the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and that she was long gone by then. They let you believe that the release of the arrest video was the cause of the suicide, but, in reality, nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead. They never say that the cops would have had no choice but to arrest her anyway, because she was a career criminal with open warrants who served felony time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. They don't tell you that she walked out on her family over a decade ago, including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, in order to live a life of crime and drugs. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Other thefts and civil judgements. They don't tell you that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. They don't tell you that she was so estranged from any family and friends that absolutely nobody came looking for her after her death, and that nobody even knows how long she was dead (probably a month due to the decay of the body) before the landlord went into the apartment looking for the overdue rent. They don't tell you that her own family said that they don't think this incident had anything to do with her suicide a year later. Nope. They also don't tell you that there were multiple callers on the beach that day who complained to the police, one of whom actually recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the cops. (That video has never been released due to graphic content.) If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat. But, they show her trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, tell you that she's a real estate agent (who hadn't sold a house in more than a decade), and everyone pours their heart out with sympathy. Well, I don't lack sympathy either. I don't like seeing people suffering, nor for their private lives to be made public. But, the Freedom of Information Act is law in this country. So, the cops had no choice but to release the arrest video after she was long gone. And, I don't like when media people spin a story to make it go viral, while intentionally avoiding all of the facts. I'm sorry that "career criminal gets herself arrested for the millionth time" doesn't go viral, while "innocent soccer mom tossed in prison by evil police" does. But, I lament even more about the viewers who blindly swallow anything they see in a 1 minute video.
    8
  30. Yeah. When you see a guy cranking at the playground, just leave him alone, he's just living his life.
    8
  31. Well, personally, I think she was making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest before they would look her up and find all of her open warrants. "Public beach" content doesn't work very well from her car.
    7
  32. Aww, aren't you sweet. You know, while you're here, I wanted to tell you about a bridge I have. You might be interested in purchasing? I mean, anybody who believes Inside Edition must certainly be interested in bridges also, right? The arrest had absolutely nothing to do with the suicide. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Sorry if Inside Edition didn't tell you that. Got some viral videos to push out, after all. Accuracy doesn't matter.
    7
  33.  @australiaplus9629  So what? The arrest video was a publicly owned video, and is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. And, it wasn't posted anywhere until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    7
  34.  @jbrown7063  But, what didn't you understand about what I wrote? The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. So, why would you make a comment like "she would still be alive" (if not for the release of the arrest video)? Good grief, it's like none of you people can read, and you all just keep buying into silly nonsense.
    6
  35. Doubtful she felt any humiliation. I mean, with her mile long arrest record, prison term for stealing cars, failures to appear in court, drug and alcohol charges galore, open warrants for her arrest, yeah, she should have been pretty used to those cuffs by then. And, let's face reality here: her landlord said that her profession was, well, one of those words that isn't allowed on YouTube comments, it involves lots of cash transactions with typically male clients. Yeah, I seriously doubt there's any shame there... especially given that nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    6
  36. The police footage WASN'T released until 1.5 years after she died. Good grief. And, how do you stop it from being released once the case is closed that long, if it's the result of a legal FOIA request? Do you want the police to commit a felony and block a FOIA request?
    6
  37. What a ridiculous reaction by so many people in the comments. This is merely clever editing and wording by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). If they told the entire story, of course, people would react differently. But, they present her like a soccer mom who has never done anything wrong, and was the victim in the story. In reality, this woman had abandoned her family about a decade ago in order to live a life of drugs and crime. She did a felony prison term for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long for other stuff. Drug and alcohol charges. Judgements against her for various thefts. Numerous failures to appear in court with open arrest warrants. Her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. And, multiple people called the police for this incident. One caught it on video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the police described it in their report quite differently than, "(sob sob) nobody was around." Apparently, it was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. It would seem she thought she was at work, rather than at a public beach. But, you can't even tell this to a lot of the commenters in this thread. Nope. Inside Edition paints the picture of a soccer mom who is a victim, and the viewers blame the cops or the people who called them when they saw a crime happening.
    6
  38. Huh? Virtually zero media even covered this when she was alive.
    6
  39. Yeah, when you see a guy dropping and cranking at a playground with kids around, just look the other way, don't report him.
    6
  40. Yes, so beautiful and sensitive. I guess that's why, years prior, she walked out on her family, including a 6 month old baby, in order to go lead a "wild" and "off the rails" life (words from her own family, not my words). And, then she went on a drug and crime spree for years, resulting in her felony prison term for stealing cars, and her many arrests for alcohol and drug charges, and multiple judgements against her for various thefts, and repeated failures to appear in court (including later for this incident in this video). I guess it's tough to get a straight job after all of that, because her landlord said that her "profession" was, well, one of those words that can't be posted on YouTube comments, ya know, it involves cash transactions with lots of men. And, yeah, then she went to the beach incident from this video, to put on a show in front of multiple people including children. I mean, you didn't actually believe her when she was trying to get out of her millionth arrest, did you? And, you do know Inside Edition is trash news, right?
    6
  41. She experienced zero shame or comments because of the arrest video, because it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. And, you clearly don't know the difference between a crime and an infraction.
    6
  42. People who do way worse in front of kids need to be arrested also. And, why would you believe her when she claimed she was alone? You do know that one of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police, right? You do know it doesn't match this "I didn't think anybody was around" version, right? You do know that she was a convicted felon with a massive criminal history, and her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right? If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'd eat my hat.
    6
  43. Imagine if it was a man on a park bench at a playground. "But, I just wanted to relieve stress while at this playground with kids watching." Yeah, spare me.
    6
  44. Yet, you won't say how?
    6
  45. "privacy is violated" Is this a joke? It's a public beach. There's no assumption of privacy. And, frankly, if she wasn't making "public beach content" for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    5
  46. Well, maybe she should have thought of that before putting on a show at the beach, huh?
    5
  47. Blame them for what?
    5
  48. The ether? The sky? The dead woman? Who?
    5
  49. Well, then maybe she shouldn't have been putting on a show in public.
    5
  50.  @riekebusch2293  Dewdrop, the "innocent soccer mom is a victim" story does nobody any good. And, I didn't initiate this misleading story, bunches of the media did. Which serves the public better? The "innocent soccer mom" false narrative? Or, "convicted felon made lousy life choices" accurate narrative? I don't want to kick anybody when they're down. But, the spotlight has been on her with or without me. I prefer accuracy.
    5
  51. If it was a man at a playground, would you say to just tell the guy to stop, nothing more?
    5
  52. Nobody did anything "to" her. Stop pretending the criminal is the victim.
    5
  53. And, they didn't tell you a few days ago when you watched that video that she was already dead 1.5 years?
    5
  54.  @kilcitykitty  ONE mistake? ONE? She was a convicted felon who served a term in prison and had a mile long arrest record and multiple judgements against her.
    5
  55. Gee, it's almost as if people get arrested for committing crimes!! Say it ain't so!!!
    5
  56. That's not bad advice. But, yes, the police had it on video from witnesses.
    5
  57. So, don't arrest anybody who is depressed?
    5
  58. Well, that's not bad advice. But, it wouldn't have mattered in this case. One of the witnesses recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. And, with her extensive criminal history, I figure she probably knew not to talk, but, probably did because she was hoping she could cry her way out of her millionth arrest before they looked up her open warrants.
    5
  59. Or, just read the arrest report, and see the multiple callers that way. It's also pretty difficult to "lie" when one of the audience recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. Seems the ACTUAL liar is the convicted felon in this video, with an arrest record a mile long, and a term spent in a Florida prison.
    5
  60. Society has decided that putting on a public show in front of children is a misdemeanor. And, sorry, but she barely got any public exposure before she committed suicide. 99.999% of the media coverage never happened until long after she was already dead.
    4
  61. Well, it's impossible to ask a dead person "why?" But, my guess is that she was making "public beach" content, but got reported.
    4
  62. Huh? She committed a crime. How do you sue for committing a crime?
    4
  63. She said she climaxed. The video of the incident (taken by one of the "audience") was very loud, including a climax. But, you're going to claim it wasn't sexual?
    4
  64. She was a convicted felon with an extensive criminal record. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and neighbors said she performed "extras" in her apartment. My guess is that she was making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    4
  65. Oh. Hey, I have a bridge for sale. Interested? I mean, if you're just going to gobble up any claptrap you see on Inside Edition, you seem like the prime candidate for this bridge. This incident happened in July of 2021. Suicide was in March of 2022. Arrest video wasn't made public until November of 2023, probably due to a FOIA request. What exact ridicule do you think she suffered from? The police never made this public until 1.5 years after she was dead. Hint in life: when a "news" story asks questions but doesn't provide the answers, and uses a bunch of tapdancing words and jump cuts and little one-sentence clips of statements taken out of context, yeah, they're constructing a viral video that is nowhere near connected with the truth. Now, how about that bridge?
    4
  66. So, if it was a guy at a playground putting on a show in front of the kids, then what? People shouldn't report it?
    4
  67. But, she wasn't humiliated. The police video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was long after she was dead. Virtually no media covered the story while she was alive. One obscure blog post while she was alive, and that was all.
    4
  68. @Trabsol Huh? The police didn't post it. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police blocked the release of the video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    4
  69. And, surprise surprise, another commenter who says "you're doing it wrong" without offering any suggestions.
    4
  70. You don't need "something" to tell you. You need only look up her prior arrest record and prison time for stealing cars, public intoxication, drugs, alcohol, changing her name to avoid arrest and being served, multiple judgements against her for theft, etc. And, you can read the articles about her family that explain that she walked out years prior, permanently leaving a 6 month baby boy, and her other son, in favor of living a wild party life.
    4
  71. And, you'd believe that she did nothing wrong, why?
    4
  72. A few additional tidbits you missed. Yes, her long legal/arrest history, you talked about it briefly, but, you didn't mention her felony prison time for stealing cars, among many other arrests and offenses. More than just one person called the police. And, one of the witnesses captured the incident on video, which is described in the police report as a very loud and public act in front of multiple people, including children. I realize this differs from the version the woman was trying to tell when she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, claiming it was a little discreet incident that nobody could see. But, yeah, I think I'll stick with the version caught on video by innocent bystanders, rather than the version told by a convicted felon who didn't want to go to prison again. The bodycam arrest video was not seen by anybody until 2.5 years later. She was already dead for 1.5 years by then. They kept it private while the open investigation was still going on (which was difficult because she kept no-showing for her court dates and tried to change her name to evade the police). But, once she was dead long enough, yes, a legal FOIA request to release the video must be honored.
    4
  73. The police didn't publish it. But, they did have to release it due to a legal FOIA request. But, that wasn't until 1.5 years after she died. So, um, no, it had nothing to do with her suicide.
    4
  74. There were multiple callers, not just one. And, sorry, but the woman ruined HER OWN life. Why is "accountability" not part of your vocabulary?
    4
  75. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. I'm not sure what your definition of "a long time ago" is.
    4
  76. So, you literally blame everyone except the criminal herself? Wow. No accountability whatsoever, huh? Here's a clue, dewdrop: if she didn't commit so many crimes, maybe she'd have stopped getting arrested so often.
    4
  77.  @nickgar6935  Huh? I never mentioned anything about myself. This was a comment about how Inside Edition skews videos to get more ad revenue, regardless of the inaccuracy of the picture they paint.
    4
  78. Sorry. Not only do I not believe you, but, I further don't believe that you'd actually expect others to ignore it and walk away also.
    4
  79. But, the arrest video didn't get released until 1.5 years AFTER she died. I realize Inside Edition never wants to say that, but, look up the dates.
    4
  80. Oh, and by the way, here's the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public (Freedom of Information Act). People in the comments blame the police for her death, but, they kept the arrest video private until long after she was dead. It's downright ridiculous.
    4
  81.  @leeli4692  The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She committed suicide in March of 2022.
    4
  82. She wasn't the only one who called about this incident, you know. But, regardless, what ELSE should someone do when witnessing a crime?
    4
  83.  @remokit  HILARIOUS!!! "Hear say"? Sorry, dewdrop, if you cannot spell it correctly, you don't know what it is. And, yes, I read the police report that you obviously did not.
    4
  84. So, you're pretending to be an attorney... but didn't know anything about the Freedom of Information Act? Oh, yes, I really believe you.
    4
  85. Whoever exposed her? Hilarious! Um, dewdrop, she exposed herself. That's the entire point here.
    4
  86. "I remember seeing the arrest video fourteen hours after it happened." Nope. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later.
    4
  87. Um, ok, but, I fail to understand who you're blaming. Who exactly is exhibiting this lack of respect you're complaining about?
    4
  88. Family? You mean the husband and two sons she walked out on more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs? They no longer even communicated with her, probably since before her prison term 6 years ago.
    4
  89.  @LG-cf4dl  Sure. I made up the arrest reports, coroner's reports, and interviews with people who knew her (including her own family). The 1 minute long Inside Edition story got it all correct, despite that the FOIA records disagree.
    4
  90. Not for this issue. But, with all of her open warrants, they had to take her in no matter what.
    4
  91. The cops held the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. But, after a case has been closed that long, sorry, but they can no longer block a legal FOIA request. You cannot embarrass a dead person.
    4
  92. Blame the victim?
    4
  93. One of the people who called the police recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. So, I think it's safe to say that the incident happened. And, why should "the news" pay anything at all for reporting the story?
    4
  94. But, she didn't end her life over this. This video had nothing to do with it. It wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she died.
    4
  95. Wow. I think she left her dignity behind about a decade ago when she left her family and career to go on a drug and crime spree for the remaining years of her life.
    3
  96. Multiple people called the police. Why shouldn't they? She was putting on a show in front of people, including children. And, why would you think this had anything to do with her suicide? Because Inside Edition asked the question (but never provided the answer)?
    3
  97. Which of the 3 at the site? And, on what basis?
    3
  98. And, that's how you'd feel if it was a man at a playground, right? You're going to walk up to him while he's, ya know, doing his thing, and talk to him?
    3
  99. What would you give to a guy cranking at the playground?
    3
  100. In front of children.
    3
  101. Yeah, sorry, my bad, it was difficult to know that you were being sarcastic. So many people here say such weird things (and mean it).
    3
  102. Blame the victim?
    3
  103. Huh? She was already dead by the time she was put on blast.
    3
  104. A) A citation for an aggravated misdemeanor? Huh? B) With number of open warrants she had, do you really think she wasn't getting arrested?
    3
  105. Yes. One of the witnesses even caught it on video, and showed the video to the police. You should read the police report. Let's just say that it doesn't exactly match the story about a quiet discreet act with nobody around (her story). But, yeah, people will make up just about anything as an attempt to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time.
    3
  106. No, dewdrop. This was merely the most recent in her long list of crimes. If she didn't commit suicide from her felony prison term, her multiple judgements from other thefts, her mile long arrest record, and her drug and alcohol problems, one more arrest isn't going to matter. And, since virtually nobody knew about this arrest until long after she was dead, how much shame could she possibly have even felt?
    3
  107. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    3
  108. Oh, way to go on the facts there. Just making stuff up as you go, huh? And, you have the audacity to blame "this country" while you manufacture your own "facts" out of thin air? Dewdrop, multiple people called the police. One woman even video recorded it with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. They described it in their arrest report as a very public and loud display, in view of multiple people. This hardly matches the version of the story as presented by a woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested, by claiming that it was a discreet and private thing with nobody around. No boat or binoculars were involved, dewdrop. Stop making stuff up.
    3
  109. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Sorry if you believe anything told to you on Inside Edition.
    3
  110. ​ @agitatedmongoose  Pffttt. Her felony term in a Florida prison, her million other arrests, her history with drugs and alcohol, the fact that she abandoned her career and family (including a 6 month old boy) to live a life of crime and drugs... those aren't a "checkered history" in your mind?
    3
  111.  @agitatedmongoose  Is your Google broken or something?
    3
  112. She served a felony prison term in Florida, and had a million other arrests.
    3
  113.  @emilybrooke_x  Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. They released it 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    3
  114. Yeah, poor guy, just wanted to enjoy himself at the playground. Kids didn't know what was going on anyway, right? Why did parents react that way to the guy cranking in front of kids? (Oh, was that a different video? Sorry, it's ok, she's female.)
    3
  115. So, it's your opinion that a stripper gets "mortified" when she is exposed? I mean, you do know her landlord said she was a stripper, right? You do know about her extensive criminal history, right?
    3
  116. This incident = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    3
  117. The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years AFTER she died before anybody even saw the video. And, what exactly do you think the police would get from views anyway?
    3
  118. I got your response in the other thread. But, I'll add a couple of tidbits here. Multiple people called about this incident, not just "one family." One of the audience recorded the show, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her version about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. After her long criminal history, it's tough to get a straight job. So, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club. Her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. Personally, I think she was making "public beach" content for her fans, and got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    3
  119. The family with children weren't the only ones that called this in. There were multiple callers. And, apparently, she had walked up and down the beach looking for a spot, and specifically chose one in view of groups of people, then plopped down and went to town with a very loud show. One of the "audience" recorded it on video and gave a copy to the police. But, that video hasn't been released due to graphic content. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    3
  120. One of the "audience" did take video. She showed that video to the police. It's in their arrest report.
    3
  121. It was most likely released as a result of a legal FOIA request. So, what's your lawsuit exactly?
    3
  122. The Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you.
    3
  123. Putting on a show in public in front of children is an aggravated misdemeanor. And, sorry, but the witnesses, and the video of the incident itself, disagree with you.
    3
  124. Law enforcement DIDN'T show this. They blocked the release of this video for 2.5 years. But, after she was gone, and the investigations were closed, they could no longer block legal Freedom of Information Act requests.
    3
  125. Um, no. This incident = July 1, 2021. She ended things = March, 2022. Video released = November 24, 2023.
    3
  126. "didn’t have to release footage" Um, yes, dewdrop. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. They blocked the release for 2.5 years. But, eventually, after the investigation was closed long enough, they could no longer block it.
    3
  127. "Essentially, they’ve brought about her death." But, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive!! So, how does that even make sense?
    3
  128. ""previous integrities" Huh? She was a career criminal with a mile long record, including a felony term in a Florida prison. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and her neighbors said she did "private extras" with lots of paying men in her apartment. Integrities?"
    3
  129.  @mrs.truthseekertruthseeker5973  And, you believe her story about thinking nobody was around, why? Because she said so, as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? The video taken by the witnesses disagrees with her story about nobody being around.
    3
  130. I agree. However, I'll add one thought: no sane person commits suicide over one incident like this, this was probably the straw that broke the camel's back.
    3
  131. Weird, it blocked my first reply. I reworded, and it posted it. Then, it allowed my first reply again.
    3
  132. First of all, dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. So, seriously, spare the world this notion about the police embarrassing her. Secondly, why would she be so ashamed of this particular arrest? She didn't commit suicide over her felony term spent in prison, nor her million other arrests. And, she waited a year after this arrest before doing it. Oh, but Inside Edition dictates to you how you're supposed to think about it, so, you blindly abide. You know, being a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long means that it must have been very difficult to get a straight job. So, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private" cash encounters in her apartment. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported, and tried to cry her way out of it. See the thing is, the multiple callers and the people who recorded the incident and gave the video to the police said it appeared very intentional. And, the video doesn't match her claims about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Oh, poor thing. Tell me, when she got busted for stealing cars about 6 years ago, did you cry "poor thing" about the people whose cars those were?
    3
  133. Naw, they're probably well aware never to trust stuff you see on Inside Edition. And, they probably know that she was a "dancer" with a criminal record a mile long, most likely making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported and tried to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    3
  134. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    3
  135. Pffttt. And, you're going to go up to her while she's cranking it and have a conversation?
    3
  136. Wow, another legal eagle. They give citations for crimes now, huh? I always thought citations were for infractions, not crimes. And, a notice to appear? Isn't that an immigration thing? You're the legal expert here, so, please explain?
    3
  137. Huh? What do you know that the medical examiner didn't know? That's a mighty huge accusation, basically libel.
    3
  138. Is this a joke? She abandoned her family over a decade ago, including a 6 month old son, husband, and another son, to live a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in a Florida prison. And, she has an arrest record a mile long for various crimes: stealing cars, drug and alcohol charges, other thefts, failures to appear, etc. Nice person?
    3
  139. Why should they? Her arrest had nothing to do with her suicide.
    3
  140. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about. Nothing you're saying is even remotely accurate.
    3
  141. Well, according to the police report, the video of the incident didn't match her story about a discreet act with nobody around. I tend to trust the police and innocent bystanders more than I trust a convicted felon who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    3
  142.  @KaoticReach1999  Of maybe you of know of you're wrong of if you of read of my initial posting of of.
    3
  143. She had two kids. And, good grief, go back to school to learn to read and write.
    3
  144. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground in front of kids, leave him alone, he's not hurting anybody.
    3
  145. It was the path back to the police cars. And, why do so many commenters make such a big deal of the walk? She had been arrested a million times before, so, I'd expect she'd be used to it by then. Plus, she wasn't shy when cranking it in front of an audience on the beach, so, why would she suddenly become shy when in the restaurant?
    3
  146. Wait until you have children and it's a creepy guy at a playground with your kids watching.
    3
  147. Is that what you'd do if you were at a playground with a guy doing the same thing? Just take your kids to a different playground?
    3
  148. One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her version about nobody being around (her claim as she was attempting to get out of her millionth arrest). To the contrary, it is described in the report as a very loud and public video in view of multiple people including children. My guess is that she was trying to cry her way out of it because she figured there'd be a 50/50 chance of getting let go, before they look up her open warrants.
    3
  149. Oh, you're a shrewd legal expert, aren't you? So, in your mind, they should give tickets for crimes? You do know the difference between a crime and infraction, don't you?
    3
  150. Honest? Huh? One of the witnesses who called about this incident recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. Why would you blindly believe her anyway? Do you know she was a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had a million other arrests? Do you know her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and that her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment? Why do you think she's honest?
    3
  151. Um, I'm not sure I understand your point here. Can you explain? The video wasn't released to the public until about 2.5 years later... or 1.5 years after she committed suicide.
    3
  152. Conspiracy? Um, not really. It's just a massively misleading video.
    3
  153. She had a mile long record, and even served a felony prison term in Florida in 2018. She departed this world for unrelated reasons to this particular arrest.
    3
  154. I sense you've been doing the same thing at playgrounds in front of kids, and cops "ruined" you.
    3
  155. Huh? What media?
    3
  156.  @pocket83squared  But, she wasn't publicly shamed from this video. It wasn't released until she was already dead for 1.5 years. And, it was probably a legal FOIA request. They can't block those if the case is closed for this long. The incident was 2.5 years ago. Welcome to Inside Edition. They ask questions, but never give the answers.
    3
  157.  @sub2me543  You keep going from thread to thread with this misinformation. You have confused the arrest date with the date the video was released. No. The release date of the video was November 24, 2023.
    3
  158.  @bulka5305  As I said, not until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    3
  159. She abandoned her family (husband, infant son not even a year old, and another son) and career more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs. She was a convicted felon who spent a term in prison 6 years ago, and had a million other arrests. And, her landlord said she was a "dancer" (ya know) at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash from a parade of men coming to her apartment. Yes, what a quality individual.
    3
  160. It blocks my responses if I write too much in one message, so, I'll answer you in pieces. First of all, nobody saw this arrest video while she was alive. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death.
    3
  161. Yes, the police interviewed the different people who called to report the incident. I won't post names, but, they're in the police report, which you can find yourself. One of the witnesses was able to capture the event on video, and showed it to the police. The police report describes the video as a loud and public event in view of multiple people including children. Sorry if that doesn't match the story she's telling about a discreet act with nobody around. But, I tend to trust the words of innocent bystanders who were able to capture it on video, before I'll trust the words of a convicted felon who was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    3
  162. She wasn't convicted, because like she did for most of her cases, she failed to appear in court. After she left her family life (including two boys from two fathers, one son who was 6 months old) in order to live a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of drugs and crime, yeah, she ended up doing a prison term for stealing cars, had multiple judgements against her for various other thefts, a long arrest record for drugs and alcohol, open warrants for her arrest, etc., she was having a difficult time with all of the charges and everything piled up. So, she attempted to change her name a few times to evade police. It seemed that she thought failing to appear in court was the best way to deal with the mounting legal battles she was having, so, she did the same with this particular arrest, and never showed up for the hearing. They tried to get the case going again, but, had a hard time locating her, and she killed herself about 9 months after this arrest, before anything could proceed in the courts (for this and any of the other charges and judgements).
    3
  163. Really? What shame do you think she suffered from? I mean, according to her landlord and neighbors, she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and did "private extras" for cash with parades of men in her apartment. And, I'd think she'd be more ashamed of her felony prison term from 6 years ago, and mile long arrest record. And, still, they didn't release the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died. So, I really don't understand this "shame" you speak of.
    3
  164. It never ceases to amaze me that so many people actually believe her when she claimed she thought nobody was around. It's as if none of you people have ever heard a criminal say, "I didn't do it" before. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had an arrest and judgement record a mile long. She had numerous failures to appear in court, resulting in open warrants. And, being difficult to get a straight job after that, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with various men. The witnesses told the police she did it intentionally. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match the idea that she didn't think anybody was around. Thanks, but, I'll believe the police and the innocent bystanders, long before I'll believe the woman in this video. Oh, but Inside Edition shows her crying for mercy, therefore it's everyone's fault but her own, right? Oh, and by the way, July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. She suffered nearly zero humiliation, because none of the big news outfits covered it until the last couple of months when the arrest video was available. She was long dead by then. Only a couple of obscure blogs I've never even heard of covered this story while she was alive.
    3
  165. Good grief. Dewdrop, the police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. Eventually, they could no longer block the release because of the Freedom of Information Act.
    3
  166. No, it was suicide about a year after this incident.
    3
  167. Tickets for aggravated misdemeanors? And, how do you "shame" someone who is already dead?
    3
  168. No. The police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    3
  169. Yes, sure, when you see a guy cranking in a playground in front of children, just mind your own business.
    3
  170. She had abandoned her family and a conventional life long before. According to interviews, her family said that she went "wild" and "off the rails" and left her husband and two children behind (including a 6 month old boy) to go off and live a life of crime and drugs. She ended up doing a felony prison term for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long, and multiple judgements against her for various thefts. Repeated charges for drugs and alcohol. Many failures to appear in court and had open warrants. And, yeah, since it's difficult to get a job after that, her landlord said in an interview that her profession was, well, ya know, one of those jobs involving cash transactions with lots of men. And, apparently, her own [abandoned] husband and one of her two children didn't go to her funeral. Yes, you're correct, this incident from this video probably didn't matter one bit.
    3
  171. Another proud graduate of YouTube University. Bravo. Dewdrop, here is the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = video was released to the public. Nobody saw the video until long after she was dead.
    3
  172. Huh? What was wrong with this arrest? She was putting on a show at a public beach in front of multiple people including children.
    3
  173. Multiple people called the police. What's your point?
    3
  174. Who? The sky? The ether? The beach? And, on what merit?
    3
  175. Yeah, apparently, she abandoned her realtor career about a decade ago, and her family for that matter, to go live a wild life of drugs and crime. She spent some time in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long. Yeah, probably not a realtor any longer, right? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club.
    3
  176. How do you humiliate a dead person?
    3
  177. Huh? But, she suffered zero "embarrassment" from this arrest video. How can you be "embarrassed" when you're dead? It was 2.5 years after her arrest that the video was made public, which was 1.5 years after she killed herself. I don't understand your point.
    3
  178. Two issues: (1) Freedom of Information Act. (2) The arrest video wasn't seen until long after her death.
    3
  179. Well, that's one way to demonstrate that you never looked into this case at all. Good grief. There were multiple callers, and three cops were dispatched. One of the witnesses even took video of the incident FROM THE BEACH, and gave a copy to the police. No, not from a remote condo with a telescope.
    3
  180.  @LeoTicky  Well, I suggest you don't forget that, then. Society isn't going back the other way. The number of cameras in public is increasing, not decreasing.
    3
  181. How'd they do that? No news media even covered this story until long after she died. There were a couple of obscure blogs that listed her arrest when she was alive, but, none of the news or big media outlets covered it until the arrest video was released.
    3
  182. Because virtually no media covered it until she was already dead 1.5 years. You can't bully a dead person.
    3
  183. Wouldn't matter. There was video of the incident itself. It doesn't match her sob story.
    3
  184. Yes, 1.5 years afterward (which was 2.5 years after the arrest itself).
    3
  185. Well, she already had a criminal record. And, no, she wasn't convicted for this incident, so, it didn't add to her criminal record. As for posting the bodycam footage, well, it was probably the result of a legal FOIA request. But, at least the woman didn't suffer any shame for this video, because it wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    3
  186. Just read the police report. You'll find out that you're incorrect.
    3
  187. Who do you think "manages" a public beach, if not the police? If a man came up at a playground and started cranking it in front of your kids, you're just going to leave and go to a different playground, right?
    3
  188. The United States Freedom of Information Act released the arrest video. The police blocked its release for 2.5 years because the investigation was open. But, eventually, once she was dead for 1.5 years, they could no longer block it. The video of the actual "show" she put on at the beach has never been released. Due to content, it remains protected.
    3
  189.  @rickydiesel1081  Yeah, that explanation is reasonable. That's why I found it confusing. Conflicting information.
    3
  190. Um, ok, but, currently the Freedom of Information Act says the opposite. You'd have to get that repealed. And, how do you get consent from a dead person? You do know the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died, right?
    3
  191. Sure. When you're at a playground and a guy comes up and starts cranking in front of the kids, just leave and take your kids to a different playground. Don't call the police, right?
    3
  192. Well, more people phoned the police than just the family. But, sorry, she is responsible for her own actions. The family didn't ask her to plop down in front of them and put on a show for their children to see.
    3
  193. Lost her job? According to her landlord and neighbors, she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) at the local club, and did "private extras" for paying men in her apartment.
    3
  194. Respect of family? Huh? The family she walked out on about 15 years ago to live a life of crime and drugs? Husband, 6 month old son, another son? That family? The family that hadn't seen her in so long that they didn't attend her funeral?
    3
  195. Welcome to Inside Edition. Good grief. This story is nowhere near accurate. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, she had a mile long arrest history and did a felony term in a Florida prison 6 years ago. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    3
  196. They were doing their job correctly, dewdrop. And, nothing went viral until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    3
  197. What treatment are you talking about? She was putting on a show in front of multiple people, including children. What did you expect would happen?
    3
  198. Huh? How do you embarrass a dead person? I mean, don't get me wrong here. I also agree that the media shouldn't use this story about a woman who is no longer around to defend herself. But, nobody aired this video until she was already dead 1.5 years. So, I fail to see how it contributed to any embarrassment.
    3
  199. OK, and when the police reply by pointing out that they successfully blocked the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died, and then they had no choice due to the Freedom of Information Act, then what happens to your suit?
    3
  200. But, the video wasn't even seen by anybody until after she was already dead for 1.5 years. How does a single word you wrote make any sense?
    3
  201. She had no business plopping herself down in view of people and going to town.
    3
  202. As usual, you don't know anything about the topic. You claimed in the other thread that you saw the arrest video 14 hours after this incident. Nope. This arrest = July 1, 2021. She was no longer alive in March of 2022. The arrest video was released due to FOIA request on November 24, 2023. They had no choice but to release the video at that point, because enough time had passed since the investigation was closed. But, be thankful that the other video (taken of the actual incident by one of the "audience") has not been released due to graphic content.
    3
  203. Blame the victim, not the criminal? Huh?
    3
  204. "I agree them cops should’ve not been called" Huh? The woman was putting on a show at a public beach in front of other people including children. More than one person called it in. If that was a man cranking at the playground, would you say the same?
    3
  205. Yes, I'm sure they planned it that way. Release the video without telling anybody she's been dead for 1.5 years. Then release an "update" video to make it seem like the first video is what made her commit suicide. Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    3
  206. What do you believe the police did wrong?
    3
  207. They managed to keep it private for 2.5 years. But, eventually, they cannot block a legal Freedom of Information Act request if the case has been closed long enough. She was dead for 1.5 years, and had to release it. I'll eat my hat if you know any of this. You're more interested in promoting your hatred.
    3
  208. I agree. This is nothing but a hit piece that is crafted in such a way to go viral, asking questions but not providing the answers (which, I'm sure they know). This incident was from July of 2021. She killed herself in March of 2022. The arrest video was not made public until November of 2023, and had nothing to do with her death. Funny that Inside Edition didn't elaborate on those facts, and left their entire story angle as "asking questions" about whether or not her arrest had anything to do with her suicide. The answer is: no, it didn't.
    3
  209. "no one has the right to judge" Nonsense. A grown woman was putting on a show in front of multiple people including children. You don't get to wash it away with "nobody can judge."
    3
  210. Huh? How did this lead to her suicide? It wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    3
  211. That's not the way it works. Good grief.
    3
  212. What news station even covered this while she was alive?
    3
  213. Also, sorry, but you don't know the facts. Multiple people called the police, not just one. And, one witness even recorded the event on a cell phone, and showed the video to the police. Sorry, but the police report's version of what happened on the beach greatly differs from the words spoken by the woman attempting to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time.
    3
  214. She was never prosecuted, because she didn't show up for court (as seemed to be the way she chose to deal with all of her various arrests, given the number of failures to appear in court, and warrants for her arrest). And, the Freedom of Information Act disagrees with your conclusions. And, nobody bullied her into suicide. The arrest video wasn't even seen by anybody while she was alive. She was long dead before it was released to the public.
    3
  215. Well, the facts don't care about your feelings. Arrest = July 1 2021. She was found dead = March 31, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023.
    3
  216. First of all, it wasn't posted until long after her death. Secondly, what happens when they say "Freedom of Information Act"? Then, what happens to those "charges" you want?
    3
  217. If you read any of my many comments in this video, you'll see that I am not in favor of this woman with the mile long arrest record, a convicted felon who spent time in prison, later turned stripper (according to her own landlord) who decided to put on a show in front of children at this beach. But, I have lots of pity. I wish this never became a story at all. But, yes, the blame is squarely on her, and nobody else.
    3
  218. And, you believe that, why? Because she said so, as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Thanks, but I'll stick with the statements given by the multiple innocent bystanders, and the video that one of them took of the incident itself, before I'll believe the words of a convicted felon who has been arrested a million times and spent a term in a Florida prison. But, in the meantime, I do have this bridge for sale, interested?
    3
  219. And, you believe her claim about being alone, why? Because that's what she said when trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    3
  220. Mostly stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear, and other thefts. Her landlord said her career was a "dancer" at the club (yeah, that kind), and neighbors say she made extra money "entertaining" a parade of paying men in her apartment. But, I didn't find any arrests for those things.
    3
  221. She also did a felony term in a Florida prison in 2018.
    3
  222. Who did? And how?
    3
  223. The police probably released the video because they're required to do so if they receive a legal FOIA request. But, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after the woman was dead.
    3
  224. Freedom of Information Act.
    3
  225. She died 1.5 years before the video was ever released. You didn't leave her any messages beforehand.
    3
  226. Spying on her? She wandered up and down the public beach, looking for a spot to do this, and plopped right down in front of people (including children). I mean, you do know her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right? You do know she served a prison term and had an arrest record a mile long, right? If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'd eat my hat.
    3
  227. Well, this was a real incident. But, yes, you're correct, this version of the story is absolutely completely fake. She was a career criminal with a mile long record, including a felony term served in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. This carefully crafted set of clips paints the picture that she's an innocent soccer mom. But, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club (yeah, that kind), and neighbors said she did "private extras" for paying men in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    3
  228. Well, you're missing some of the facts that Inside Edition conveniently left out. First of all, she hadn't been a realtor for about a decade. She left that career and husband and kids behind about a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. She did a felony prison term for stealing cars, and had a mile long arrest record for other stuff. Her actual profession at the time of this arrest was being a stripper (this is according to her own landlord). Secondly, it's doubtful anybody made fun of her. This arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. And, anybody who knew her already knew of her profession and arrest record. Doubtful that one more arrest would matter that much to them. Third, to answer your question about why she didn't go to prison again, she didn't show up at court. She went through a period of trying to evade the police by changing her name (for many different crimes/warrants). They basically lost track of her for a while. And, she simply never showed up to court for this arrest (as well as other arrests). Hope this helps.
    3
  229. Huh? Why? What do you believe they did wrong?
    3
  230. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry, but the video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. But, hey, it's wonderful to see so many great legal experts on YouTube comments.
    3
  231. Multiple people called about this incident. One witness even caught it on video, and showed it to the police. The arrest report describes it as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Go up and talk to her? Is that what you'd do if it was a man at a playground? Just go up and talk to him while he's cranking away? C'mon.
    3
  232. Huh? The woman who decided to put on a show in front of multiple people including children is/was responsible for her own actions. You don't get to shift blame upon the victims.
    3
  233. After that? Well, if I was her, I'd probably show up at court and negotiate it down to a minor infraction with community service and agree to go to counseling. This woman, however, chose not to appear in court at all (which seemed to be how she handled most of her mile long list of arrests). As for asking her to stop and let her go, I'm afraid you do not understand the difference between an infraction and a crime. Your blame is misplaced, due to complete and total ignorance.
    2
  234. Yeah, let's blame the victims. Multiple people called the police. The witnesses said that she intentionally chose to plop down in front of other people. One recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It was a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Oh, but wait, you believe she was alone and being discreet, right? After all, the woman said so to the police as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to risk going back to prison again. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private" transactions with numerous men in her apartment. For all we know, maybe she was making a video of herself performing in a public audience instead of at the club. But, yeah, let's believe her instead of the innocent bystanders, by all means. Blame the victim, not the criminal.
    2
  235. Huh? I fail to understand what the basis for the suit would be. What's the exact complaint that's worth a suit?
    2
  236. Well, even with her long criminal history, if she had shown up for court, this would easily negotiate down to a minor infraction, and she wouldn't have to register anything.
    2
  237. With multiple complaints for a misdemeanor, you think they're issuing a warning?
    2
  238. Probably because of a legal FOIA request.
    2
  239. A) Cuffing is mandatory for all criminal arrests. B) C'mon. She had felony prison term and an arrest/judgement record a mile long. Sorry, but she doesn't get to claim humiliation when she keeps getting herself arrested.
    2
  240. Huh? She did a felony term in prison for stealing cars. She had multiple judgements against her for various other thefts. She had numerous drug and alcohol charges. She had open warrants for her arrest due to failures to appear in court. That's not a criminal?
    2
  241.  @novavira1864  Read the arrest reports and the medical examiner's report. It's really that simple.
    2
  242. Your first sentence, nobody around? How do you know this? Because a woman who is trying to avoid getting her millionth arrest said so?
    2
  243. Multiple people called. One of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. With her extensive criminal background and track record for failing to appear in court after being arrested, my best guess is that she generally knows to keep her mouth shut, but, she also didn't want them looking her up to find open warrants. If she stayed quiet, there'd be a 100% chance that they'd look her up. But, if she tried to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, there'd be a 50/50 chance of them letting her go without looking her up.
    2
  244. So, basically, you want to repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    2
  245. How was she "handled" poorly? Can't you be specific?
    2
  246. Agreed 100%. However, I just don't know what the suit would be based upon. Yes, they misrepresent stuff via clever wording and omitting key details, but, how do you get a claim out of that?
    2
  247. The Freedom of Information Act dictates the exact opposite of what you're asking for. But, the police can (and do) block the release of the video while there's an open investigation. That's why this particular video was not made public until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    2
  248. So, in order to call the police for a crime, you need to be 100% perfect?
    2
  249. Just making sure here: you do know she was one of the career criminals, right? You do know she did a felony term in a Florida prison, right? Stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, etc., and a million other arrests, right? You do know this, right? You didn't just watch 1 minute on Inside Edition and believed everything they said, right?
    2
  250. And, when the news says "Freedom of Information Act," what happens to your suit?
    2
  251. Yes, and judging by the comments, 95% of the viewers fall hook line and sinker for the manipulated story.
    2
  252. Yeah, I wish that wasn't the case also. But, it's part of the Freedom of Information Act. I'm not sure what else could be done. But, if there's any silver lining, at least she didn't need to suffer any embarrassment from the arrest video. It wasn't released until about 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  253. Her arrest was never shown before she passed.
    2
  254. So, you'd have given a warning for a crime? This wasn't an infraction, you know. We don't pay police to have that kind of discretion for a crime. For that, we want the courts to negotiate what happens, not having the cop be judge and jury. And, how much do you really know about what happened here? Multiple people called for this incident. Witnesses said she did this deliberately in front of people. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It didn't match her version of a quiet act with nobody around. It was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people, including children. Also, she had served some felony time in prison for stealing cars, had an arrest record a mile long, judgements against her for various other thefts, an arrest record a mile long for various other stuff, including numerous drug and alcohol charges, and open warrants for repeatedly failing to appear in court (which, she also failed to appear for this arrest). You're going to let her go with a warning? Furthermore, why would you believe her act anyway? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said that she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. She had no actual "job" to speak of. This video claims she was a real estate agent, but, she had left that life behind, ditched her career and family (including two sons) about a decade ago to live "off the rails" and "wild" (her family's words), for a life of crime and drugs instead. Seriously? You're letting her go after putting on a show in front of children?
    2
  255. A) Watch the whole arrest video, not the 1 minute version. She admitted it. B) Regardless of that, she was getting arrested anyway. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the version told by the witnesses and the video doesn't match the version told by the convicted felon who is trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    2
  256. Accountable for what? What do you propose instead? Ignore the Freedom of Information Act? The cops managed to keep the video out of the public's eye for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. Eventually, though, if the case is closed long enough, they can no longer block a video from being released.
    2
  257. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  258. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  259. And, given all of her open warrants, do you think the cops had any choice but to arrest her?
    2
  260. You skipped the part about her term in prison, and million other arrests, and drug/alcohol problems.
    2
  261. She put on a show in front of multiple people including children. That's a crime. And, no, it didn't cost her life, because this got almost no press until long after she was dead.
    2
  262. Um, ok, accountable for what? I do not understand.
    2
  263. "Shame" - Huh? Nobody even saw the arrest video while she was alive. What "shame" did she suffer? And, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private" cash encounters with a parade of men in her apartment, um, yeah, I tend to doubt she knew what "shame" meant.
    2
  264. Well, not only is that version completely incorrect... but, pretending that it is... your "logic" is that nobody should ever report a crime for fear that the criminal might harm him/herself?
    2
  265. Really? What more discretion do you expect from the cops? They pulled her away from the restaurant, out of earshot of anybody while questioning. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. They still haven't released the actual video of the incident itself, and probably never will. What more do you want?
    2
  266. Huh?
    2
  267. Well, what you're outlining WAS the original intent. The Dr. Smith character wasn't even in the pilot. That character was an afterthought, and, they intended to have him around for a few episodes, then kill him off. But, the performances by Jonathan Harris (Dr. Smith) and Billy Mumy (Will) stole the show, even though they were supposed to just be background characters. And, the audiences loved the robot. So, responding to audience demands, it didn't take long for the primary plot lines to shift away from the Robinson mother/father, and toward the ones most popular with audiences. Remember, this was a typical weekly show, where they're writing the episodes, shooting the scenes, and then they went on the air a couple of weeks later. They didn't plan out the episodes years in advance. They didn't have scripts ready until they were almost ready to shoot.
    2
  268. Who did this?
    2
  269. Well, if you believe this particular arrest was some sort of tipping point, well, I wouldn't know whether to agree or not. But, if so, she waited 8 months after this "tipping point" before she killed herself.
    2
  270. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  271. Well, with her mile long arrest and criminal record and prison time, stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, numerous judgements against her for theft, changing her name over and over again to avoid arrest, repeated failures to appear at court, etc., if that's what a "good" Christian is, please explain what a "bad" one is?
    2
  272. "a reasonable expectation of privacy" - No, not even close. Sorry, dewdrop, but, there is no such concept on a public beach.
    2
  273. "didn't even have the right to arrest" Wrong, dewdrop. Multiple people called about this incident. She put on a public show in front of the public, including children. One person even recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police (not released due to graphic content). With that, plus all of her other open warrants, yes, she was going to get arrested.
    2
  274. "disgrace to whoever called 911" Oh? You mean the innocent families and bystanders? Tell me, if it was a guy cranking at a playground, would you be saying the same?
    2
  275. Virtually nobody covered this until well after she was dead. You know this, right?
    2
  276. And, you believe that, why? Because Inside Edition says so?
    2
  277. Starting with you. You cannot even spell "business" correctly, what could you possibly know about it?
    2
  278. Most likely a FOIA request. But, more importantly, what charges? What's the basis of a lawsuit?
    2
  279. First of all, that was the route back to the police cars. Secondly, she should have been pretty used to being arrested, what with her mile long criminal record, million other arrests, time spent in prison, etc. She got arrested so often that the police probably had those pink cuffs made just for her. So, I'm not exactly going to have sympathy when the felon who couldn't stop getting herself arrested, got arrested again.
    2
  280. Yes, the restaurant should have had many different pathways to get back to the police cars. The restaurant deserves the suit for sure.
    2
  281. Well, it wasn't posted anywhere until 2.5 years later (which is 1.5 years after she died). But, the answer to your question is the Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  282. First of all, multiple people called the police. One woman even video recorded the incident with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. They described it in their police report as a very loud and public display that was visible to multiple people. This hardly matches the claims of a woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested by saying it was a discreet incident with nobody around. Secondly, the release of the bodycam video was probably the result of a legal FOIA request. But, it had no bearing on her suicide, because the arrest video was not made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, whose blood is on whose hands?
    2
  283. Yeah, she was their primary meth customer.
    2
  284. Huh? Police don't post this on YouTube, media outlets do that.
    2
  285. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground in front of kids, mind your own business!! Let him crank tomorrow in front of the kids again. And, the next day. And, the next. And, let me get this straight, you think the police were seeking "fame" by releasing the arrest video 2.5 years later (as a result of a FOIA request)? Huh?
    2
  286. The media didn't publish the arrest video until it was released on November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. So, um, no.
    2
  287. Huh? You don't get warnings for crimes. You've confused crimes with infractions. Secondly, one of the "audience" recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public show in view of multiple people including children. Or, were you just going to blindly trust the woman who is attempting to get out of being arrested for the millionth time?
    2
  288. The multiple people who called the police, and the video one of the "audience" took of the incident, tells a very different story than the woman does while she's trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time.
    2
  289. No, dewdrop. The woman is accountable for her own actions.
    2
  290. She said she thought she was alone, so, you blindly believe her. The "I didn't do it" line that is spoken by a million people trying to get out of getting arrested. Multiple people called the police. One in the "audience" even video recorded it on her cell phone, and then showed the video to the police. The police described that video in the arrest report, saying it was a very loud and public display, in view of multiple people, including children. Even in Europe's beaches that permit people to run around without any bathing suits on at all, they don't permit this kind of public display. And, yes, sorry, but there's nothing wrong with making a comparison to a man at a playground. If this was a man at a playground, you know darned well that you wouldn't be saying, "oh, just go up to him and give him a warning before calling the police." And, no, her life wasn't ruined over this incident. She ruined it in a million other ways.
    2
  291. Naw, they probably know darned well that this is an Inside Edition story, and the picture they paint is about as far from reality as you can imagine.
    2
  292. Huh? What "news" even covered it while she was alive?
    2
  293. Yes, it was public, by definition. Yes, the witnesses said it was intentional, because she had been wandering up and down the beach looking for a spot, and specifically chose one in view of people. Why would you believe otherwise? Because that's what she said as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to potentially go back to prison again? Let's see... multiple people called the police about this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, and had a mile long arrest and judgement record for other stuff, stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, etc. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with numerous men. Is it REALLY that difficult to conclude that maybe she was making a "public" video to promote herself? Why do you believe the convicted felon, rather than innocent bystanders or the 3 police officers who investigated this incident?
    2
  294. I tried putting this into Google translator, but, it was still all gibberish. Would you maybe try to write this in your own native language, and people can translate for themselves? Because, in English, what you wrote here means nothing at all. Thanks.
    2
  295. Dewdrop, she plopped down in front of multiple people (including children) and put on a show. Why do you believe her when she said nobody was around? Because she said so as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  296. Huh? I'm not sure what you mean. She was responsible for the video. And, she's dead now, so, she cannot be jailed. I truly can't imagine that's what you meant, though. But, I just don't get it.
    2
  297. Yeah, I don't get it. Who do you want to jail, and why?
    2
  298. OK, and how do we stop it? Repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    2
  299. The police didn't release the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years. And, even at that, it was because of a legal FOIA request. But, you just keep on pretending to understand things you don't.
    2
  300. How would you have prevented it, if you worked at the police department? They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, while the investigation was ongoing. But, 1.5 years after she was dead, the investigation was closed, and they could no longer block legal FOIA requests.
    2
  301. You have the order of events wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, its release had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide.
    2
  302. Wow, what a complete and total butchery of the facts. First of all, the family that saw her took video of the incident, and showed it to the cops. The police report says that what happened on that video doesn't match the claims that this woman is making for a very short and discreet act with nobody around. Secondly, the woman in this video suffered ZERO public shame or humiliation from the story here. The incident happened in July of 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2022. And, the arrest video was not made public until November of 2023, more than a year and a half after her death. There was no public shame involved. It was her own poor life choices and mental illnesses that caused her to commit suicide.
    2
  303. @@user-gk6opkdu My source for the police report is the police report.
    2
  304. Hilarious!!! Only mistake? With her felony prison term for stealing cars? With her mile long arrest record? With her multiple judgements against her? With her drug and alcohol charges? Need I go on?
    2
  305. Um, ok, on what charge?
    2
  306. Huh? What part of the Freedom of Information Act specifies to block the identity?
    2
  307.  @ozzieone67  Yes, dewdrop. They did. Freedom of Information Act. But, as I've been telling you in all of the rest of the threads where you spew nonsense, they didn't release it until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    2
  308. Oh, you're certainly correct. I agree. But, in this case, it probably wouldn't matter. See, multiple people called the police. One of the crowd that saw the incident even video recorded it with her cell phone, and showed it to the police. Their police report describes the video as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. She was getting arrested no matter what she said, or didn't say. The stuff in the bodycam video was just getting her to admit the act, solidifying the case. But, yeah, there was no way to avoid arrest.
    2
  309. Is that what you'd do if it was a guy cranking at the playground? Go have a chat? Get real. Not a bad person? With a million various arrests, convictions, and judgements against her, and a felony term served in a Florida prison? Frankly, none of that bothers me nearly as much as the fact that she walked out on her family more than a decade ago, including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, because she wanted to live a life of crime and drugs instead of raise her children.
    2
  310. They didn't, dewdrop. They kept the video private for 2.5 years, PREVENTING its release, until the investigation was closed for long enough that a legal FOIA request released the video. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  311. Freedom of Information Act. And, what would be the purpose of blurring after she was dead?
    2
  312. Huh? It was a suicide. Nobody killed her. What do you mean?
    2
  313. Blame the victim, not the criminal?
    2
  314. Huh? Multiple people called the police. One woman in the "audience" even recorded it with her cell phone, and showed that video to the police. No binoculars were involved.
    2
  315. Huh? Her arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. She didn't experience any shame over the release of this video, because she was already dead before anybody saw it. Her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. Sorry, but, Inside Edition isn't real news.
    2
  316. Also, it's called The Freedom of Information Act. Do you think police want their videos made public? No. But, they have no choice, once an investigation is closed for this amount of time.
    2
  317. Yes, I agree, I don't want to see videos like this being made public. I just don't know how to stop it while the Freedom of Information Act permits it. Secondly, spare the world, seriously. You opened by claiming that binoculars were involved. And, rather than just admitting you were wrong and didn't have a lick of understanding about the topic, you're tapdancing. Good grief. Is it THAT hard to just admit you're wrong?
    2
  318. And, it seems to have blocked my posting that explained that she didn't commit suicide until 1.5 years AFTER this video was released.
    2
  319. The only person involved in her death was HERSELF. And, I have no understanding of what "shame" or "damage" you think anybody else created. Who created this damage and shame you're yelling about? How? What would you have done differently?
    2
  320. Well, then you'll be pleased to learn that nobody saw the video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  321. Sorry, you'd lose your bet. I'd offer to take your bet. But, I already know you're wrong in advance.
    2
  322. Nobody put her arrest video online until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  323. Well, multiple people called the cops. And, it had nothing to do with her death anyway. I mean, you don't trust Inside Edition, do you?
    2
  324. And, you believe her when she claimed to be alone, why? Because she said so while trying to avoid her millionth arrest? I have a bridge for sale. Interested?
    2
  325. Well, according to her landlord, she was a stripper. I doubt this had any impact on her career.
    2
  326. If a man comes up to you and kids at a playground and starts cranking, just go to a different playground, don't report him.
    2
  327. Another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law, huh? First of all, you can get a ticket for an infraction, but, you get arrested for a crime. This was a crime, not an infraction. You clearly do not know the difference. Secondly, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police couldn't block the release of the video after the woman had already been dead for 1.5 years. But, you go right ahead and keep pretending you know the law, and keep giving legal advice, you're really good at it.
    2
  328. What didn't you understand here? She had her privacy. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it until 1.5 years after she was dead. I don't know how much more clear I can make this.
    2
  329. When did they start giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    2
  330. Huh? She put on a show at a public beach in front of people, including children. What did you expect should happen? If it was a guy at a playground putting on a show in front of the kids, would you be saying something different? Or, is that also "nothing" in your mind?
    2
  331. She wasn't humiliated. The arrest video wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she was dead. As for "good person" -- Not by a mile. She served some felony time in prison for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long. Multiple judgements against her for theft. Open warrants for her arrest for various failures to appear. Attempts to change her name to evade the police. Numerous drug and alcohol charges. Her landlord says that her "career" was being a stripper at the local club (and it's suspected/assumed that she also made money on the side for one-on-one time). Apparently, she decided to put on a similar show at the beach.
    2
  332. Well, nobody knows the exact date of her death. Her body was found on March 31, 2022. But, apparently, it happened well before that, because it was well into the maggot phase of decomposition. And, nobody saw the arrest video until November 24, 2023, so, I doubt it had any effect on her stress.
    2
  333. The media had very little to do with this. And, she never had a trial because she didn't bother to show up in court (as was her normal pattern for most of her prior arrests). She had already been attempting to change her name for years, but, with all of her open warrants and her prison history, the courts wouldn't let her.
    2
  334. In the USA, if you do this in front of children, you get arrested.
    2
  335. You didn't see the arrest when she was alive. She died two years ago. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. What you saw was a choreographed media effort to get two viral rounds instead of one. By posting the arrest video without mentioning that she was already dead, they got to post another round stating that she committed suicide, and let people falsely believe that it was due to the first round.
    2
  336. Well, if it's any consolation, nobody saw the video while she was alive. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later.
    2
  337. Why do you believe her when she said thought nobody was around? Because she said so as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? When did they start giving tickets for aggravated misdemeanors?
    2
  338. Dewdrop, nobody saw this arrest video until long after she was dead, so it had no bearing on her suicide.
    2
  339. The video taken of the incident itself by the witnesses doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around.
    2
  340. According to her landlord, she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment.
    2
  341. Now, will you answer the question? When did they start giving tickets for aggravated misdemeanors? Why didn't you answer?
    2
  342. And, you believe this because Inside Edition said so?
    2
  343. Would you say that if it was a man at a playground?
    2
  344. Well, she should have thought of that before abandoning her family and career over a decade ago, and chose to live a life of crime and drugs instead. Or, were you under the false impression that this arrest resulted in anything negative for her?
    2
  345. No, she barely got any coverage until after the arrest video was released, which was 2.5 years later. She was long gone by then. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  346. Dewdrop, multiple people called the police. One of the witnesses recorded it, and showed it to the police. The arrest report says that the video shows her in a loud public display in front of children. Shame on YOU for lying and saying otherwise.
    2
  347. Good grief. "Mortified ultimately"? Sorry, but it's tough to take this bad play on words.
    2
  348. They didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later. The police blocked the release as long as they could, but, since she was dead for a long time, and the case was closed, they could no longer block FOIA requests.
    2
  349. If it's any saving grace to you, the privacy was protected and the video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was already dead for 1.5 years by that point. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    2
  350. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry, but, nobody humiliated her with the arrest video. It wasn't released until after she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  351. Open investigation vs. closed.
    2
  352. Because that's the procedure every single time.
    2
  353. Yes, I agree. But, I just don't know how to prevent it, what with the Freedom of Information Act. But, the one saving grace is that the woman didn't suffer any shame from the arrest video, because it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    2
  354. Well, first of all, there was virtually zero "shaming" while she was alive, because virtually nobody knew about this until 2.5 years later. Secondly, this little arrest is nothing when compared to her million other arrests, her felony term spent in prison about 6 years ago, or her "career choice" of (according to neighbors) being a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and frequently "entertaining" a parade of paying men in her apartment.
    2
  355. How was she treated horribly, in your mind?
    2
  356. Denials wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" had captured it on video, and showed the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. She was getting arrested either way.
    2
  357. Ridiculous. Blame the victim? Not the criminal? How about accountability?
    2
  358. What was ridiculous? And, what "wrap" do they get? Reynolds aluminum foil? Seran plastic wrap? And, yes, the murder story is interesting, but wrong. It was a suicide.
    2
  359. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Almost no media covered this story until after the video came out.
    2
  360. In general, they blur for open investigations, and don't blur for closed ones. Since this incident happened 2.5 years before anybody saw the video, and she was long gone by then, there is no requirement to blur. But, what's the basis for your suit? I honestly don't have any idea (and neither do you).
    2
  361. Well, I wouldn't know, but, my guess is that she was trying to cry her way out of things before they looked her up to find her criminal history and open warrants.
    2
  362. Some additional facts that Inside Edition has no desire to tell: Arrest history and prison time for stealing cars and public drunkenness. Long history of additional theft, legal judgments against her, and failure to appear in court, attempts to change her name to evade being served/arrested, etc. Was once a real estate agent, but, no sales in quite some time. Living on welfare. Failure to pay rent. Suspected actual income from, ya know. This arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. This arrest video made public = November 2023. She suffered zero shame from the arrest video, because nobody saw it until she was dead for 1.5 years. Her own family doesn't report that the suicide was the result of this arrest, but, rather a history of drugs and alcohol. One of the members of the "audience" from this beach incident recorded it with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. It's described in the police report as a very loud display in front of multiple people including children. And, the audience reported that it appeared that she was walking around, looking for a spot to do this, and it seemed that she chose specifically a spot that was visible. And, she had long since abandoned her own family and kids, years before this beach incident. This is why she was missing for so long with nobody even knowing she was already dead. Many of her own family, including her husband and one of her sons, did not attend her funeral. Her own family said that she had gone "wild" and "off the rails" years before. Does this paint a different picture than the Inside Edition story that asks questions, but never gives answers?
    2
  363. Blame the victim? What's wrong with you?
    2
  364. Really? That's your reply? Hey, dewdrop, don't blame me for your own issue of being gullible enough to believe a single word out of Inside Edition.
    2
  365. Yeah, blame the victim. And, when you see a guy at a playground cranking it in front of the kids, leave him alone, don't turn him in.
    2
  366. Exactly why, had she shown up in court, it would probably be negotiated down to a minor infraction.
    2
  367. Yet, she managed to live another year or so after this arrest.
    2
  368. The restaurant was the path back to the police cars. And, nobody "leaked" anything. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  369. "Of been" isn't a verb. The only "fishy" thing about her suicide was that she survived the gunshot wound for a while before she bled out. It's rare, but, not so rare to consider it truly fishy. All of the evidence points to a suicide, and literally no evidence to the contrary. And, there were no witnesses. The closest thing to witnesses were neighbors who said they thought there may have been a scuffle a month before her body was found. But, since the medical examiner's report said that she was known to be alive 12 days before her body was found, it doesn't line up with what the witnesses claimed. And, once again, they didn't actually witness anything. They were guessing.
    2
  370. And, if it was a man at a playground?
    2
  371. You're missing the point. The pretty face generates ad revenue. If they didn't show the face, this video gets 9 hits.
    2
  372. Well... kind of... yes. But, how do you "bully" a dead person?
    2
  373. Police abused power? HOW? WHEN?
    2
  374. Multiple people called for this incident. 3 cops were dispatched. The other cop (not in this video) gathered up the names and statements, and took a copy of the video taken by one of the witnesses who recorded the woman on the beach. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version about being alone. She was putting on a show in front of people including children. I didn't know her, but, my guess is, given her "career" (as given by her landlord) as a stripper at the local club, I'd say it's fairly likely she was making video material of herself performing in public, perhaps to put online to make money. After all, she was a convicted felon who served time in prison about 6 years ago, and had been arrested a million times since. So, as far as I'm concerned, the credibility of innocent bystanders and police, greatly outweighs anything she says.
    2
  375. But, dewdrop, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. It was released 1.5 years after she died, due to a FOIA request.
    2
  376. You clearly don't understand the difference between a crime and an infraction. The video taken by one of the "audience" differs completely from what she's claiming while she is attempting to avoid being arrested for the millionth time.
    2
  377. Of course you weren't aware. You prefer to rant about things you know nothing about.
    2
  378. She was probably making "public beach" content for her fans at the "adult dance" club where she worked. I'd hardly think embarrassment had anything to do with it (outside of her bad acting when trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest).
    2
  379. Well, the facts differ from what you want to believe. And, no, she wasn't shamed to death, despite the picture that Inside Edition paints for the sake of making a video go viral.
    2
  380. So, you refused to even read what I wrote. Bravo.
    2
  381. Just read the arrest report. Good gods. I'm not talking about THIS video. I'm talking about the video taken by the "audience" of the actual act on the beach.
    2
  382. Good grief. What humiliation from Inside Edition? Incident = July of 2021. Suicide = March of 2022. Arrest video was made public = November of 2023. "The media" didn't pump this story up until she was dead for 1.5 years. Yet, they want you to believe that humiliation had something to do with her death. Why? Because it generates hits and ad revenue.
    2
  383. Media and officers? For what?
    2
  384. Blame the victim? What's wrong with you?
    2
  385.  DDArtsArts  I was addressing the OP.
    2
  386. Yes, one person in the crowd that saw the woman did take video with her cell phone, and showed it to the police.
    2
  387. Well, the bodycam footage was never seen by anybody until it was released on November 24, 2023. Her suicide was in March of 2022. So, sorry, you didn't see this arrest video until she was already dead for 1.5 years. Furthermore, they give tickets for crimes now? I always thought tickets were for infractions, not crimes. But, you're the legal expert here, not me, so please elaborate... when did they start issuing tickets for crimes?
    2
  388. And, that's an answer to my question, how?
    2
  389. For making an arrest? Huh? I think your suit would lose.
    2
  390. Multiple people called, dewdrop. One of them even took video, and turned that over to the police. (It has never been released due to graphic content, but, the report says that it was a very loud and public show, in view of multiple people including children.) Why are you not blaming her for her own actions? Would you say the same if it was a guy at a playground putting on a loud show in front of the kids?
    2
  391. "they way she explained" And, you'd believe her, why? You don't think she was just trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? You don't think she was just trying to talk her way out of things before they looked her up and found her extensive criminal history and open warrants? Just checking here: you do know her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and neighbors said she also did "private extras" for a routine parade of paying men in her apartment, right?
    2
  392. Dewdrop, when did I even mention grammar? Did you bother reading anything I wrote? Or, did you blindly assume I said something about grammar?
    2
  393. Dewdrop, exactly how much "humiliation" do you think she suffered when the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later? Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  394. Dewdrop, realtor? She hadn't sold a house in about 15 years. The BMW was from a very long time ago, before she left her husband and two sons to live a life of crime and drugs.
    2
  395. No, dewdrop, she wasn't "successful until this." She spent a felony term in a Florida prison in 2018, and was convicted for bunches of crimes (mostly drugs and thefts, including car theft). Get a clue.
    2
  396. So, that's it? You spewed a bunch of nonsense, and told ME to "do more research"? Then you ran away? You Googled something about her owning a BMW and you incorrectly assumed it was recently, rather than 15 years ago, and you decided that it makes you an expert? You'd rather live in a fantasy world where the convicted felon and drug addict was the "innocent soccer mom" that Inside Edition is presenting in this video? Dewdrop, what she did was no different than if some guy on a park bench at a playground put on a loud show in front of children. The only person "responsible" for this incident is HERSELF. Don't blame people for reporting it.
    2
  397. "u know nothing but hate !" Dewdrop, YOU are the one who sat there and "hated" (so to speak) the multiple people who did the proper thing, and called the police when they saw a crime happening.
    2
  398. "I never said I knew everything !" Dewdrop, you Googled a couple of things (after I corrected your nonsense), and saw that she owned a BMW (a very long time ago). You then asserted she was "successful" up until this incident, completely ignoring the fact that she had a mile long record, including car theft, other thefts, drug and alcohol charges, open warrants, and a prison term in 2018. You also asserted that she was a real estate agent, when she hadn't sold a house in 15 years.
    2
  399. Next time, how about actually knowing something about a topic before you start pointing blame? The woman in this video is RESPONSIBLE FOR HER OWN ACTIONS. Do not blame people who did the proper thing by reporting crimes when they see them.
    2
  400. Great job going back and editing/deleting your various messages, dewdrop. You're a true hero. I suppose that's not your fault, just like you don't blame the woman in this video for her own actions. It's everyone else's fault you deleted/changed all of your messages, right? Just like it's everyone else's fault that the woman in the video decided to put on a loud show in front of children, right?
    2
  401. "she thought she was alone" Again, why would you believe that? Because that's what she said, as she was attempting to wiggle out of her millionth arrest? The witnesses reported that she walked up and down the beach, and specifically chose a spot in view of other people, and then put on the show. Frankly, if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  402. "not put on a LOUD show" Then why did the police say it was a loud show, dewdrop? That comes directly from their own report. Let me guess, you told me to "do more research," but, you never lifted a finger to read the report yourself, eh?
    2
  403. "I never googled anything" Right. You knew about her BMW just as a random guess.
    2
  404. "I finished" Sure you are. When it's pointed out that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, and you just love pointing hatred and blame (and then accuse me of doing exactly what YOU are doing), sure, run away. Again, blame everyone else but yourself.
    2
  405. Huh? The arrest video was not made public until 1.5 years after her death, which was 2.5 years after the incident. This never went viral until long after she died. And, if you think she was a lovely lady, well, ok, from this video, I'm assuming. But, by the time she committed suicide, the medical examiner's report said the body weighed 86 pounds. Apparently, she was going really downhill in life in the approximate year between her arrest and her suicide.
    2
  406. I don't understand. Who is "you people"?
    2
  407. But, no news station covered this until long after she was dead.
    2
  408. Multiple people called the police. One woman recorded it on her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. The police report says that it was a very loud, and very public display, in view of multiple people including children. This differs from the version told by a woman trying to get out of being arrested. But, yeah, tell me, if you believe her, how do you explain how people saw her, if she wasn't in view of anybody? How did the police view a video of the event, if nobody could see it? And, sorry, but you don't get warnings for crimes. You can get warnings for infractions. But, crimes don't work that way. Learn a little bit about the legal system before advocating something that cannot legally happen.
    2
  409. First of all, other than one obscure article on a website I had never even heard of, she didn't suffer a single bit from any public shame or comments. The arrest video wasn't made public until she was already dead 1.5 years. And, none of this stuff went viral until about a month ago. She died in March of 2022, almost two years ago. So, no, she didn't read any comments about this, because she was already dead before anybody ever commented. Secondly, sorry, but her claims about thinking nobody could see her just don't jive with the police report. The woman in the "audience" who recorded the incident showed that recording to the police. The police described the video in the arrest report, which said that it was a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. Sorry if you take her word for it, as she's trying to avoid being arrested, claiming that she thought nobody could see her. But, yeah, that's just another form of "I didn't do it." Yes, many criminals say that. Thirdly, I don't know about you, but, if I was in her shoes, I'd be far more ashamed of her arrest record for stealing cars and public drunkenness. But, it seems that "shame" wasn't even in her vocabulary.
    2
  410. Oh, I'm in total agreement. This isn't "news," it's a crafted story designed to go viral in the interest of generating clicks. To address why, well, ad revenue. But, on a deeper level, I think they probably feel like this woman was fair game. They portray her as a shy soccer mom, caught in an unfortunate situation. The reality was that she was a stripper who put on shows like that every day at the club, served a felony term in prison for stealing cars, and had an arrest record a mile long, judgements against her for various thefts and other stuff, drug and alcohol charges, and open warrants for failures to appear in court. So, I'm guessing that the media looked at her as "deserving." Personally, I disagree. I think if they're going to publicize it, they should do it accurately. But, it would be better not to publicize it at all.
    2
  411. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground, leave him alone! He wants to do that every day, and doesn't need you getting in his way.
    2
  412. Um, ok, but, who do you think shamed her? Who even knew about this while she was alive?
    2
  413. I will add: she walked out on her career and her family (including a husband, 6 month old son, and another son) over a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests. And, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  414. She willfully chose to put on a show at the beach. The arrest was justified. And, with her extensive criminal history, and open warrants, let's face reality here, she was getting arrested no matter what.
    2
  415. Would you say that if it was a guy cranking at the playground?
    2
  416. It was on a channel that doesn't exist any longer. I don't know if we'll ever know who it was. But, just checking here, because you don't make it very clear... you're aware that nobody saw the arrest video until she was already dead 1.5 years, right?
    2
  417. First of all, there were two callers. Secondly, they were both female. Third, how about blaming the criminal instead of the innocent bystanders?
    2
  418. A) Contrary to the picture being painted by Inside Edition, this video had nothing whatsoever to do with her suicide. B) Multiple people called the police during this incident. One of the crowd that saw her took video of the incident. They showed that video to the police. It is described in the police report as a very loud and very public display in view of multiple people including children. This definitely differs from the version being offered by a woman attempting to avoid getting arrested. But, I'd wonder why you'd just blindly believe her? Because she said so? "I didn't do it" is a common claim of people being arrested. Why do you believe her, vs. believing a million other people who get caught? C) A bathroom window is different than a public beach.
    2
  419. Yeah, when you see men at the playground doing the same thing in front of the kids, mind your own business, right?
    2
  420. So, you think we should NOT go to the police when we see crimes? And, you'd go up to someone in the middle of cranking and have a conversation? Stop pretending.
    2
  421. No. It didn't go viral until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    2
  422. So, let me make sure I understand you correctly. There were enough witnesses such that they called the police, and one of the "audience" even recorded the incident. The police saw the video and described it in their police report. But, you reject it. Why? Because you trust the words of a woman who was trying to avoid getting arrested again? She had a legal/arrest/prison record a mile long. She did some time in prison for stealing cars. She had multiple judgements against her for theft. She has arrests for drugs and alcohol. She has "failure to appear" charges so numerous that she tried changing her name in order to evade the police serving her again. But, she's the one you're sticking with, and not the police and witnesses? Really?
    2
  423. Multiple people called the police. Why shouldn't they? A crime was happening. That's what you're supposed to do.
    2
  424. Yes, one of the "audience" captured it on video and showed it to the police.
    2
  425. No.
    2
  426.  @America-First2024  Bodycam, yes, its subject to FOIA. 3rd party videos, no.
    2
  427.  @America-First2024  Is pretending to know things you don't know just a regular hobby for you? The police don't have the video, dewdrop. They described it in their police report. The 3rd party witness has the video. Go ahead, try to FOIA her (the 3rd party).
    2
  428.  @America-First2024  Thanks for confirming exactly what I said.
    2
  429. Just checking here... you do know that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right?
    2
  430. First of all, multiple people called this incident in. One woman video recorded it with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. They described it in their report, stating that it was quite a loud display, in view of multiple people. This is a far cry different than the claims she's making about it being a discreet thing with nobody around. Secondly, the arrest video wasn't even made public until 2.5 years later, which was also 1.5 years after she died. I'm sorry you're buying into false media hype, but, look it up. This arrest video had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide.
    2
  431. Inside Edition told you so, therefore you believe every word.
    2
  432. Empathy and kindness? And, you picked THIS woman's story to push that agenda? The woman with the mile long arrest record, the felony prison term for stealing cars, various judgements against her for theft, multiple charges for drugs and alcohol, many repeated failures to appear in court (including for this arrest, and many prior), open arrest warrants, etc. And, according to her landlord, her profession was, well, one of those words that's banned from YouTube comments, but, ya know, involving cash transactions with lots of men. And, this is your shining beacon of empathy and kindness?
    2
  433. First of all, you get a ticket for an infraction. Speeding. Fishing without a license. Etc. For a crime, you get arrested. Secondly, why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  434. Well, maybe she could get the help if she bothered to show up at court for this arrest. An incident like this, even though she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, would be minor enough to be negotiated down to a minor infraction, with some community service and counseling ordered by the court. But, she didn't show up (as seemed to be pretty common for her, given the number of open warrants for failures to appear).
    2
  435. Yeah. Blame the victims, not the criminal. When you see a guy cranking at a playground, there's a special place for you if you call the police.
    2
  436. Well, with the number of times that this woman has been arrested, yeah, plenty of those times were "real" enough for you, I'm sure.
    2
  437. On what basis?
    2
  438. Well, then maybe you'd like to know that there's a different version of the story than the words spoken by a convicted felon while trying to avoid her millionth arrest. Multiple people called the police. A witness said that she had wandered up and down the beach, and it seemed that she intentionally selected a spot in view of people. Another witness caught the event on camera, and showed the video to the police. Read the arrest report. It says the video shows a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. I've never met her, but, who knows, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club, maybe she was advertising for tonight's show or something? Or, with her mile long arrest record and her felony prison term for stealing cars, maybe she just can't help herself from committing crimes?
    2
  439. No, dewdrop. She's not the victim, she's the criminal.
    2
  440. Oh, because putting on a public show in front of multiple people including children is an aggravated misdemeanor.
    2
  441. How do you "cyber bully" someone who is dead already?
    2
  442. Huh? She was a convicted felon who served time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests/crimes/judgements. If she's not a "real criminal," who is?
    2
  443. Let's blame the victim.
    2
  444. Well, you certainly do. But, how is that relevant to anything in this video?
    2
  445. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. It had nothing to do with her suicide, because she was long dead before anybody saw it.
    2
  446. Swing and a miss. Um, no. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw it.
    2
  447. Answers = 1) Police bodycam. 2) Probably from a legal FOIA request. 3) No, the release of the video had nothing to do with her suicide. The video was kept private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she killed herself. 4) She was probably laughing because the police watched the video taken by one of the people in the crowd who saw the incident, and the video showed that it was nothing like her description of a private discreet act. The police report says that the video showed a very loud and public display in view of multiple people, including children. 5) You need to stop trusting Inside Edition.
    2
  448. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    2
  449. She doesn't sound horrible. It's a matter of understanding the facts. Multiple people called the police. The witnesses say that she wandered up and down the beach, and it looked like she deliberately chose a spot in view of others. One witness captured it on video and showed it to the police. The video didn't match her version of a discreet act with nobody around. Quite to the contrary. And, let's face reality here: her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right? Is it THAT much of a leap to conclude she might have done it intentionally? But, when faced with her millionth arrest, it seemed she tried to pretend she didn't do what she did?
    2
  450. Another super sleuth with a law degree from YouTube University. Please explain EXACTLY how her character was defamed, can you?
    2
  451.  @America-First2024  Wrong. One of the "audience" recorded it on video and showed it to the police. She was getting arrested either way.
    2
  452.  @America-First2024  You don't actually think I'm going to tell you more after your prior ridiculous comment, do you?
    2
  453. Huh? What media ruined her life? And, what should the police do instead of arrest her?
    2
  454. Huh? What in the world do you mean? What did they do wrong?
    2
  455. Yeah, take your kids to a playground, and notice a guy doing the same thing, and tell me that you'll just leave him alone and not do anything.
    2
  456. Well, yes, it is the same thing. And, while it's true that women don't serve prison terms as often as men, that rule didn't apply to this woman in this video. She did a felony prison term already for stealing cars.
    2
  457. She left her real estate career (and her family) behind about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime.
    2
  458. Well, multiple people called the police because of this incident. One woman recorded it with her cell phone camera, and showed the video to the police, who wrote about it in their police report. They describe it as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people. I realize that doesn't match the version as spoken by the woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested, claiming it was a discreet incident with nobody around. But, hey, never trust a drug addict, right?
    2
  459. Do you say the same about the people who reported her for stealing their cars? I'd think that her arrest record for car theft is a lot more shameful than this beach arrest (for which she never suffered much consequence).
    2
  460. Well, with her mile long arrest and prison and legal record, I doubt this incident was all that significant.
    2
  461. Besides that it's against the law?
    2
  462. Hilarious display of yours. You really drank the Inside Edition Kool-Aid, huh? Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022 (unknown date). Body found = March 31, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. Sorry to inflict reality upon you, while you're on your Inside Edition inspired crusade, but, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide, because nobody saw it until she was dead 1.5 years. Sorry if the facts don't cause videos to go viral, and Inside Edition asked a bunch of questions, but never answered them (because that's instead how videos go viral). But, hey, you believe what you want, ok pumpkin?
    2
  463. Yeah, he doesn't seem like the brightest bulb. He was the main guy also saying that her suicide was a murder (also incorrect, because it was a suicide).
    2
  464. First of all, she never registered as anything from this incident. She never even showed up at court to be charged.
    2
  465. That's not bad advice. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" caught it on video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version of a discreet act when nobody was around. And, if they didn't arrest her for this incident, they'd have arrested her for any one of her numerous open arrest warrants for her long list of failures to appear on prior offenses.
    2
  466. A ticket for an aggravated misdemeanor? And, sorry, but with her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, million other arrests, and open warrants for failing to appear in court, yeah, make no mistake here, she was getting arrested that day.
    2
  467. How do you humiliate someone who is dead?
    2
  468. Well, they make the arrest where the crime happens.
    2
  469. Yeah, let's blame the victims, not the criminal herself, right?
    2
  470. Don't blame the witnesses for calling the police. Blame the criminal herself.
    2
  471. Yes, I agree. And, the only saving grace here is that she didn't suffer from any of the shaming herself. The video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died, so, she never personally suffered any ridicule for it. But, yeah, no need to make a public display of her in death. It's not helping anybody.
    2
  472. Yes, one of the audience recorded it and showed the video to the police. Yes, in front of multiple people including children. Given her lengthy arrest history, time served in prison, and (according to her own landlord) her "profession" as a stripper at the local club, and beach witness reports, I don't think it's that difficult to conclude that she was probably making a "public beach" video.
    2
  473. Huh? She thought she was alone? And, you believe that, why? Because she said that while attempting to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time, and didn't want to go back to prison again? I don't know where you live, but, here in the USA, we don't exactly trust convicted felons who spent time in prison, and have been arrested a million times. Very often, when being arrested, they try to lie to talk their way out of it.
    2
  474. It is blocking my replies about the gun laws. Go read them.
    2
  475. Can you name any media that even published the story before she was dead?
    2
  476. Would you say the same if it was a man at a playground?
    2
  477. Yes, July 1, 2021 = arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. December, 2023 = viral.
    2
  478. And, you'd believe that, why? Multiple people called the police. The witnesses said that she wandered up and down the beach, and chose as spot in view of people. One witness recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Sorry, but the report describes the exact opposite as "nobody was around." It states that it was in view of multiple people, including children. Why would you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who served a term in prison, with a mile long arrest and judgement record after that, trying to avoid her millionth arrest. Why would you think she thought she was alone? Because she said so? Is that all it takes to convince you? You're going to shame the victims, and support the criminals? I know where the person is who deserves shame. He's in your mirror.
    2
  479. Inside Edition says so, you believe it. Can I sell you a bridge I have for sale?
    2
  480. It was released on November 24, 2023, as a result of a legal FOIA request.
    2
  481. The police must handcuff for every arrest.
    2
  482. As for help, well, had she bothered to show up in court, maybe the court would have mandated that as part of the negotiation.
    2
  483. Well, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, it's all speculation. But, her "job" (according to her landlord) was as a stripper at the local club. She probably wouldn't lose her job for this, she'd probably get a raise.
    2
  484. Of course it wasn't over that. It's Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    2
  485. First of all, no, nothing was plastered all over the internet while she was alive. There were a couple of obscure blog postings while she was alive, but, 99.99% of the coverage happened after the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. So, no, there really wasn't much embarrassment over this arrest. Secondly, let's face reality here: her landlord said she was a stripper. Her neighbors said that she did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with numerous men. If you think this woman had any notion of "shame" in her life, um, no. And, really nice person indeed. She abandoned her husband and two sons (one of the just 6 months old) about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. She did a felony term in prison for stealing cars. She had a million arrests, drug and alcohol charges, judgements against her for other thefts and crimes, numerous failures to appear in court, open warrants, etc. Yeah, such a nice person.
    2
  486. Not a bad person? With a mile long criminal record, including a felony sentence in a Florida prison? She walked out on her family, including a 6 month old son, another son, and a husband, more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentleman's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. At what point, in your mind, does someone ever get labeled as "bad" if she's not?
    2
  487. There's this new thing called "the internet." Try it out sometime.
    2
  488. But, you have your facts wrong. The arrest video was never in the public domain until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    2
  489.  @isabella-a-a-a  Being unwilling to watch 10 minutes of backstory is one thing. But, to openly skew the story to paint the wrong picture is something else. Notice they opened with a question, "Was she shamed?" They never answered the question. They use it to avoid responsibility. "We weren't lying, we were asking a question." The audience thinks the question IS the answer.
    2
  490.  @rebeccalewers5060  That is not true. That's just what the real offenders like to say to explain how/why they got on those lists. "Oh, my bladder was about to burst so badly I couldn't stand it, it was either ruin the interior of my car, or go behind the dumpster, I chose the dumpster, and now I'm on those offender lists." In reality, they did far worse, but, they don't want to admit the real reason they're on the lists.
    2
  491. Oh look, it's another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law.
    2
  492. So, it's the blog owner's fault somehow?
    2
  493. Maybe you should learn something about the case before you use that sarcasm. She was a convicted felon with a mile long arrest record. Multiple people called about this incident, and one of them even recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her "nobody was around" sob story. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  494. Well, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. I'd think those career choices would produce more dangerous men than a news story. But, just FYI, with the exception of a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, none of this made the news until long after she was dead.
    2
  495. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them even recorded it, and gave the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version about nobody being around. Why do you believe her anyway? Because she said so, as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  496. They understand the difference between an infraction and misdemeanor. You do not.
    2
  497. Huh? The family should sue the police department for what?
    2
  498. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  499. Why? What's the basis for your suit?
    2
  500. No, murder isn't a lawsuit. That's a prosecution. Again, what's your basis?
    2
  501. You're obviously very proud to know nothing.
    2
  502. Yes, and it was quite dishonest of media not to tell you at that point that she was already dead 1.5 years prior. Instead, they staged it so that the first video would come out, then the follow-up a month later, to pretend that the first video caused the death.
    2
  503. Dewdrop, multiple people called, and one of them recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. And, no, the police didn't expose her. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, once the investigation was closed (she was long dead), they could no longer block FOIA.
    2
  504. Dewdrop, you believe she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so, as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again?
    2
  505. Well, that's only if you believe Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). But, pretending you're correct anyway, ok, so, nobody should call the police when they see a crime?
    2
  506. Well, the arrest video wasn't put on the internet until 2.5 years later, long after she died. And, as for her "embarrassment," well, why would you believe her anyway? The witnesses and the video taken of the incident do not agree with her story about nobody being around. To the contrary, the witnesses said it was an intentional act. Frankly, I find the innocent bystanders and police far more credible than the convicted felon trying to whine her way out of her millionth arrest.
    2
  507. Really? Multiple people called. One of them recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this story about nobody being around. Why do you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had an arrest record a mile long, with open warrants. Do you REALLY believe she wasn't going to get arrested? Oh, and the video wasn't posted anywhere until long after she was dead.
    2
  508. Millions for what? For doing their jobs?
    2
  509. Nobody humiliated her. Stop trusting Inside Edition. Good grief.
    2
  510. Wow. Before this incident, she already had quite a history. A mile long arrest record, prison time for stealing cars, numerous failures to appear in court, multiple judgements against her for theft, reported by her landlord as being a, ya know, the things some women do for income when they can't get a straight job any longer, many drug and alcohol issues, etc.... really honorable.
    2
  511. Want to try writing this again after you're sober?
    2
  512. Coworker? Like fellow strippers? Family or friends? Like those people she walked out on more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs?
    2
  513. Wow this is what happens when u watch Inside Edition and blindly believe them because no she wasn't humiliated because the arrest video didn't get released to until way after she was dead and none of the news covered anything until the arrest video went public but she died 2 years ago and the arrest video wasn't seen by anybody while she was alive plus she had been arrested a million times before and never killed herself and why would she wait 9 months if she was so embarrassed and who do you think embarrassed her a couple of blogs nobody heard of
    2
  514. How do you bully and ridicule a dead person?
    2
  515. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  516. It's on the news to get ad revenue. But, fear not, it was never on any news broadcast while she was alive.
    2
  517. And, why would you believe she thought she was alone? Because that's what she claimed as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Oh, but yeah, sorry, when you see a guy cranking at the playground with kids around, just leave him alone, he's not harming anyone.
    2
  518. Well, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, I would hardly think this woman would get embarrassed by being seen. As a matter of fact, the witnesses said it was intentional.
    2
  519. She ruined her life a decade prior when she decided to leave her family and career in favor of a life of crime and drugs. And, sorry, but one of the witnesses recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around. Why do you believe her anyway? With her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, etc., it's tough to get a straight job. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans.
    2
  520. A ticket for a crime? Can you name any crime that they issue tickets for?
    2
  521. So, you don't advocate people who report crimes when they see them? And, yes, it was in front of kids.
    2
  522. Really? When did they start giving a ticket for a misdemeanor crime? I thought you only got a ticket for an infraction. But, you're clearly the legal expert here, so, please enlighten me?
    2
  523. Yes, an arrest is what happens from an aggravated misdemeanor. And, sorry, but the Freedom of Information Act is what it is. At least nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive.
    2
  524. Just checking here... you do know that the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead, right? There was very little "public humiliation" involved here. As for the shame you're now inflicting upon the police for finally releasing the arrest video (again, 2.5 years afterward, which was also 1.5 years after she was dead), what exactly do you propose they should have done instead? They kept it private for all of that time, but, they can only block a legal FOIA request for so long. Once the case has been closed long enough, they can no longer block FOIA requests. I'll eat my hat if you even know any of this.
    2
  525. Huh? What did the justice system do wrong?
    2
  526. I agree. And, I'll add, it's even worse that that, because this "news" story (not news) is very cleverly worded to completely alter what really happened here. If they're going to drag a dead woman's name through the mud, they should at least paint a more accurate story.
    2
  527. No, shame on the woman for performing in front of an audience on a public beach including children.
    2
  528. She was a convicted felon with a prison history and a million other arrests. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind). If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat. Multiple witnesses called about the incident, and one of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Stop blaming victims for the crimes of others. Good grief.
    2
  529. I'm sure they wish the same upon you for judging something you know absolutely nothing about.
    2
  530. I agree (except I wouldn't know what the "jail" part would be for). But, just checking here: you do know that the timeline was this, right? July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = public release of the arrest video. December, 2023 = viral.
    2
  531. Wrong. The shame belongs to Inside Edition, for intentionally painting a false picture of what happened here, by clever wording, out of context quoting, and asking questions without providing the answers. The police did well here. They got calls from multiple people. One woman used her cell phone to record the incident, and showed it to the police. They described the video in their police report as a very loud and public display in front of multiple people, including children. Arresting her was the correct action. Furthermore, the police managed to keep the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after her suicide. Eventually, it was probably made public due to a legal FOIA request, which the cops cannot refuse, once the case is closed long enough. I'm sorry you fall for videos that try to make you think that the release of the arrest video had anything to do with her suicide, but, sorry, it didn't. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody in the public ever saw this video. So, stop blaming police, and start blaming Inside Edition for false reporting.
    2
  532. Wouldn't matter in this case. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her story about a discreet act with nobody around.
    2
  533. When you see a guy cranking at a playground, better not say anything, because it might lead to something bad, right? I mean, not that I even agree that the woman in the video lost her life over this arrest... none of her other million arrests resulted in that... why this one? And, why wait a year? It makes no sense. But, on your premise alone, it makes even less sense. Never report a crime, because the criminal might do harm to him/herself??
    2
  534. I hope you feel guilty for blaming the victims about a topic you know nothing about.
    2
  535.  @PanhandleFrank  Technically, she might be talking about the one and only site that did cover the story when she was alive: Smoking Gun. They posted her photo. But, yeah, 99% of the people in the comments don't understand the timeline at all.
    2
  536. Well, she hadn't seen her children in how long? Like 10 or 15 years, right? And, yes, she had a mile long legal/arrest/prison history.
    2
  537. I feel bad for her also. But, I don't know what you mean by "this is not right." What's not right?
    2
  538. The cops responded to multiple calls, and dispatched for it. One of the "audience" had taken video of the incident and showed it to the police. They describe the video in the arrest report as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. One of the witnesses reported that this woman had wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, and chose a spot in front of a family with children. They can also look up her mile long arrest and prison record for various offenses, thefts, drugs and alcohol, prison time for stealing cars, failures to appear in court, etc. Between all of that, and the witnesses, do you really believe the cops weren't going to arrest her? They should have done something else, in your mind? Furthermore, the cops never released the arrest video for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after her suicide. So, the police didn't expose her to anybody. Nobody saw the police video while she was alive. And, after the case was closed that long, they can no longer block legal Freedom of Information Act requests. So, I'll ask again, how and why do you think the police should have done this differently?
    2
  539. I don't lack sympathy for her. I just don't understand why so many people just blindly swallow whatever Inside Edition feeds them.
    2
  540. Huh? That's a mighty huge accusation. Got any evidence?
    2
  541. They DID handle it differently. They arrested her, but, she never served any time or suffered any conviction for it. And, they managed to NOT release the video to the public until 2.5 years later (or 1.5 years after she committed suicide). What EXACTLY do you think they should have done differently?
    2
  542. Oh? When did they start giving tickets for aggravated misdemeanors? You're the legal expert here, not me, so please elaborate?
    2
  543. Um, ok. What did these cops do that violated their training?
    2
  544. Huh? It was an aggravated misdemeanor. What else were they supposed to do?
    2
  545. She abandoned her career and family (including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son) more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. And, neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. So, I think she had as many loving boyfriends as money could buy.
    2
  546. Yeah, but "innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" goes viral. The real story doesn't.
    2
  547. Freedom of Information Act. I agree, yes, the video shouldn't have been made public. I just don't know how anybody can really prevent it, what with the legal FOIA request process. And, sorry, but they DID keep the video private for 2.5 years. She was dead for 1.5 years before anybody ever saw the arrest video. But, eventually, you just can't block FOIA requests if the case has been closed too long.
    2
  548. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  549. Hilarious!! The video taken by one of the "audience" disagrees with you. Oh, but you keep on pretending to know things you don't, ok?
    2
  550. Yes, of course. But, stop believing everything you see on trash TV like Inside Edition.
    2
  551. Oh, another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law, huh?
    2
  552. Well, the police didn't show it. They blocked its release for 2.5 years. But, eventually, Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  553. Doubtful. With her mile long arrest and prison record, I seriously doubt she cared much about this particular arrest. She failed to appear in court for this incident, just as she had bunches of other failures to appear for numerous other thefts and crimes. And, sorry, but she wasn't plastered anywhere until 1.5 years after she was already dead. And, why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so?
    2
  554. OK, and, how would you plan on making that happen? What choice do they have? And, just checking here, you do know she was dead for 1.5 years before the arrest video was released, right?
    2
  555.  @Hakunamatata51101  What kind of COVID? 9mm? Or, .22?
    2
  556. That story doesn't go viral. Soccer mom was shamed to death goes viral. Viral = ad revenue.
    2
  557. Huh? Virtually no media even covered it while she was alive.
    2
  558. Would you say the same if it was a man at a playground? Just mind their business and take their children to a different playground?
    2
  559. But, the arrest video was not released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died. You do know this, right? You don't just blindly believe Inside Edition, do you?
    2
  560. What drama! Good grief. The cops held the arrest video private for 2.5 years before anybody saw it. She was dead 1.5 years before it was released (probably as a result of a legal FOIA request). Why do you think there was all of that humiliation? Because Inside Edition says so?
    2
  561. Well, if you remember seeing the arrest video, then it was already after she was long dead. As for why it was published: Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  562. But, one of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Denying it wouldn't have made a difference.
    2
  563. Wow, so many proud graduates of YouTube University's School of Law in these comments. 1) They don't give warnings for crimes. You're thinking of infractions. 2) Shocker, a criminal says (essentially) "I didn't do it," and you just swallowed it? And, "sorry" gets you out of crimes now? 3) Multiple people called the police. One of the "audience" took video, and showed the police. Sorry, but the contents of the video do not match the claims of this woman who was trying to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time. 4) Her life is over because she ended it. It's very doubtful this arrest had anything to do with it, given her mile long legal history, arrests, prison time for stealing cars, judgments against her for multiple thefts, repeated failures to appear, arrest warrants, you name it. I doubt this particular arrest made a bit of difference to her. 5) The video didn't go public until after she was dead 1.5 years.
    2
  564. There were three officers dispatched, not two. And, as for the rest, you have absolutely no understanding of the topic.
    2
  565. Well, after her mile long arrest record, prison term for stealing cars, numerous judgements for theft, countless drug and alcohol offenses, etc., it's pretty doubtful that she had sold any houses in the past decade or so.
    2
  566. Yeah, according to her landlord, her real "profession" was, well, ya know, basically what she did on the beach, except involving cash transactions with lots of men.
    2
  567. If it was a man at a playground, would you go up and ask him to leave? Or, would you call the police?
    2
  568. Ad revenue.
    2
  569. Multiple people phoned the police about this incident. One of the "audience" even got it on video, and showed the video to the police. They describe that video as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. Furthermore, one of the witnesses told the police that the woman wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, and seemed to intentionally pick a spot right in front of a family with kids. And, yeah, sorry, but I'm more likely to believe that she intentionally did this because of all of those things, than to just blindly trust the empty words of a woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time.
    2
  570. No, she killed herself 1.5 years before any major news outlet covered it.
    2
  571. Who publicized it while she was alive? A couple of obscure blogs?
    2
  572. Well, yeah, I agree, but, the media never touched this story until long after she was dead....
    2
  573. Freedom of Information Act. After she was dead for 1.5 years, the police could no longer block the FOIA requests for the video, and had to release it.
    2
  574. Well, according to her landlord, she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and neighbors said she did "private extras" with bunches of paying men in her apartment. It's pretty likely that putting on this "public beach show" was making media for her fans. So, quite the contrary, I doubt this affected her "job" at all.
    2
  575. Clarification, she left her family years and years before this incident.
    2
  576. Was it proven that she did something illegal? Well, what's your definition of "proven"? Apparently, most of her other stuff was proven, since she served time in prison and had a list of judgements against her. Proven in this case? Well, the police had the video taken by the "audience." And, it seems more believable to me than her version. I know it's really difficult to get a straight job after living a life of drugs and crime for so many years (her, not me). So, according to her landlord, she worked as a stripper at a local club. And, rumors say that she also did "one-on-one" cash transactions. So, I don't have a difficult leap to believe she was guilty of willful indecent exposure on the beach that day. Again, I don't allow myself to just listen to her whine and cry about being alone and nobody seeing her. I tend to trust police and innocent bystanders before I trust convicted felons. But, "proven," well, I'll leave that up to you to decide.
    2
  577. Well, I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "this footage." Do you mean the video from woman in the "audience" that recorded the incident with her cell phone? If so, as far as I'm aware, nobody besides the police and the woman have seen that video. Or, do you mean the police bodycam footage? If so, yeah, that's what police do nowadays. The public wants them to do that. But, I don't think you meant the police bodycam footage, because then you wouldn't have said "along with the police." It makes no sense. Can you clarify?
    2
  578. As a general rule, they blur for open investigations, don't blur for closed ones.
    2
  579. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  580. To clarify: This incident = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released due to FOIA = November 24, 2023.
    2
  581. "if she went through so much hell from being exposed on the internet that she took her own life" But, that's not what happened. The arrest was in July of 2021. She killed herself in March of 2022. The arrest video wasn't released until November of 2023.
    2
  582. A) Nobody had to leak anything. Freedom of Information Act. B) Nobody saw the arrest video until after she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  583. I find it quite doubtful that she even knew what shame was. After all, it's not like she could actually get a normal job, after her mile long arrest record, felony prison term for stealing cars, multiple judgements against her for various thefts, drug and alcohol charges, numerous failures to appear in court with resulting arrest warrants, etc. So, according to her landlord, her profession was, well, one of those words that's banned from YouTube comments, but, ya know, involving cash transactions with lots of men. And, just checking here, but, you do know that the arrest video and all of the media attention didn't come until 2.5 years later, right? She suffered zero shame from the arrest video being released, because she was already dead for 1.5 years by the time that happened. Just making sure you knew that... because it seems like you just blindly trust Inside Edition is giving you the facts. Um, no, they don't.
    2
  584. Do you really not understand police bodycams? Multiple people called for this incident. Alone on the beach? You'd believe that, why? Because the woman says so while trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and potentially didn't want to go back to prison again? The witnesses didn't think she was alone. One of them even caught the act on video, and showed the police. The video didn't show her alone. It showed her in a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Is there any possible reason you'd believe the stuff you believe, beyond "Inside Edition told me so"?
    2
  585. It's pretty doubtful that the media had anything to do with her suicide. There were only a couple of obscure websites that posted a blog about her arrest while she was alive. The big media coverage didn't happen until long after she was dead.
    2
  586. She walked out on her family (including a 6 month old son and another son) more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She was thrown into prison about 6 years ago for stealing cars and other thefts. And, sorry, dewdrop, but she did everything TO HERSELF. The world didn't cause anything. She caused it all by herself. Does the word "accountability" fit into your vocabulary at all?
    2
  587. Almost no media covered this until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She was long dead before anybody saw it. There were only a couple of blog posts on obscure websites that mentioned this arrest while she was alive. And, I really doubt she would feel shame over this incident anyway. She had been arrested a million times before, and even served a felony term in prison, and didn't commit suicide over those arrests. Why would she commit suicide over this arrest (and waited 9 months to do it), when almost nobody even knew about it? And, let's face reality here, c'mon, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with lots of men. Do we really believe she felt any shame here? For that matter, the video taken by one of the witnesses doesn't match her story about a discreet act with nobody around. Quite to the contrary, because they say it looked quite intentional, and was in view of multiple people including children. I'll trust police and innocent bystanders more than I trust a convicted felon trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    2
  588. Liable for what? Her suicide? The video was posted 1.5 years after her death, so....
    2
  589. Huh? Can you name any media that even covered this story while she was alive?
    2
  590. Well, I certainly agree... except for the bullying part. How do you bully a dead person? No social media even covered this incident until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  591. Oh? And, you think this little arrest was her reason a year later? Why not any of her other million arrests? Why not her felony term in prison in 2018? No? It was THIS one that got her?
    2
  592. But, it wasn't very publicized until long after she died. One obscure article on a website I've never heard of. Other than that, all of the viral videos never happened until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    2
  593. Yes, the police should be called, and yes, they were called by multiple people. That's how the society works. And, no, she wasn't all over the news or publicized until long after her death. While she was alive, a couple of obscure blog posts on sites I've never heard of said she was arrested. But, the big viral videos didn't come out until the arrest video was made public 2.5 years later. You have your facts wrong.
    2
  594. Um, no. The family video recorded the incident, and showed it to the police, who wrote about it in their report. Apparently, it was quite a public and loud display that went on for a while, hardly the short few seconds that the girl represents when she's trying to avoid getting arrested.
    2
  595. Um, ok? But, society has already decided that it IS a crime.
    2
  596. Well, you might consider reading the medical examiner's report. It says she weighed 86 pounds at her death, and that her implants were jutting out of her emaciated body in such a way to really emphasize how unhealthy she was. It seems that she really went downhill quite a bit in the year between this arrest video and her suicide. The reports say that the family said it was mainly drug related.
    2
  597. Never underestimate ignorant people who know nothing about what happened, blaming the police out of unwarranted hatred.
    2
  598. Big deal. Man has some pleasure at a playground. Why even arrest him? Leave him alone and go to a different playground.
    2
  599. Yes, you're wrong. She suffered zero embarrassment from Inside Edition or any other major "news" (not news) outlet, because nobody covered this story until she was dead for 1.5 years. The one exception was an obscure article on a website I've never even heard of, but, it was just a small tabloid with a photo, not the arrest video (which wasn't released until well after she was dead).
    2
  600. OK, but, how do you prevent it?
    2
  601. Yes, but, in this case, they would have arrested her whether she said anything or not. One of the crowd that she was "performing" for recorded it and showed the video to the police.
    2
  602. Well, they didn't share the video until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then. And, they only shared it as a result of the FOIA.
    2
  603. But, dewdrop, nobody saw the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  604. It was a suicide. She killed HERSELF. Not this "they" you're referring to.
    2
  605. Yeah, they probably know very well that this is an Inside Edition story (where facts don't matter), and is extremely misleading.
    2
  606. But, dewdrop, nobody shamed her over this arrest video. It wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  607. Now, how does that notion even make sense, in your mind? If they wanted to humiliate her, then they would have released the arrest video while she was still alive. You can't humiliate a dead person.
    2
  608. The police did exactly that. They blocked the video's release for 2.5 years. But, eventually, the Freedom of Information Act dictates that if the person is gone long enough, the video can't be blocked any longer. Just be happy that they still block the release of the actual video of this incident itself (due to graphic content).
    2
  609. But, the video wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    2
  610. Well, they didn't make the arrest video public until long after she died. And, how can you avoid it? Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  611. Well, had she shown up for her court date, perhaps they would have given the counseling. But, as usual (for her), she never showed up.
    2
  612. She destroyed her own family about a decade ago, when she decided to leave them all behind to live a life of crime and drugs.
    2
  613. 1) The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it. 2) They eventually couldn't block the release once the case was closed long enough. Freedom of Information Act. So, please elaborate: what EXACTLY would you have done differently?
    2
  614. Well, after having abandoned a normal life in favor of a life of drugs and crime, serving a felony prison term, and having an arrest record a mile long, well, it's not all that easy to get a straight job. So, according to her landlord, she worked as a stripper at a local club. Putting on shows like that were a daily thing for her, but, this time, she chose to put on the show at a beach in front of multiple people including children. (Sorry if that doesn't match her claims about a discreet act with nobody around, while she's trying to avoid her millionth arrest. But, one of the "audience" caught it on video, and showed it to the police.) Anyway, I seriously doubt that "shame" was part of her vocabulary.
    2
  615. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    2
  616. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  617. We don't want our police playing judge and jury. We want the courts to do that. And, as for releasing the arrest video, the police kept it from the public for 2.5 years. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after her suicide, probably as a result of a legal FOIA request. So, bravo, you're a true legal sleuth alright.
    2
  618. Let's see... hmmm... Inside Edition, a garbage "news" source... or the actual police reports... which to believe... which to believe... this is a tough call here....
    2
  619. Yes. The video was kept private for 2.5 years. But, 1.5 years after she was already dead, the police can no longer block a legal FOIA request.
    2
  620.  @wisdombright9821  There's a timeframe related to how long the case is closed - no longer under investigation. In this issue, the case was closed because she was dead. The exact timeframe varies from state to state, city to city, and circumstances. I don't know all of the details pertaining to how each case is handled, I just have the higher level understanding.
    2
  621. Why? How did the officer cause her death? That's a mighty huge claim you're making.
    2
  622. Huh? No news outlets even covered this until 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, um, no. And, how do you propose to stop the video from being released (1.5 years after she died) when faced with a legal FOIA request?
    2
  623. This arrest had nothing to do with her suicide. You're watching Inside Edition!!! Why would you believe any of it? Why did none of her other million arrests result in suicide? Why didn't her felony prison term 6 years ago result in suicide?
    2
  624. And, you believe that, why? It's Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). None of her other million arrests or prison term resulted in suicide, why should this one?
    2
  625. Why would you believe that? Because Inside Edition said so? None of her other million arrests, nor her felony prison term, resulted in her death. Why would this one?
    2
  626. She didn't kill herself over any of her other million arrests. Why would you think she did over this one?
    2
  627. Yes. She was a convicted felon who served a term in prison about 6 years ago. She also had a mile long criminal history, stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failure to appear, you name it. After prison, it was difficult to get a straight job, so, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'd eat my hat. I mean, you didn't believe her sob story, did you?
    2
  628. Huh? Almost no media even covered this event until 2.5 years later, long after she was already dead. And, sorry, but let's get real here... her landlord said her "profession" was, well, one of those words you can't put on YouTube comments without being blocked. And, after her mile long arrest and prison record, already a convicted felon, with tons of open arrest warrants and a long history of drugs and alcohol, I'd hardly think this incident would tarnish anything... especially because, as I already said, nobody saw this arrest video until long after she died.
    2
  629. She was. It was a suicide.
    2
  630. Huh? What's your lawsuit against the police based upon, exactly? It was probably released under a legal Freedom of Information Act request. But, the cops managed to keep it from being released to the public for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after her death. Seems like they did a pretty good job to me. But, this is your thread. So, yeah, please explain, what's the basis of your lawsuit again?
    2
  631. TRANSLATION: "I don't know what I'm talking about, but, I cannot admit it, so, I'm going to just say 'agree to disagree' and then hide my slander under the 1st amendment."
    2
  632. Sure, but, she suffered almost zero humiliation.
    2
  633. But, the arrest video WAS protected. Nobody saw it until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  634. Tell me about it. It's out of control. It'll take a lawsuit for violation of free speech to get them to quit it, but, someone will have to figure out a way around the user agreement (no lawsuits allowed).
    2
  635. Huh? This incident was from July of 2021, 2.5 years ago. She suffered zero bullying from the release of the video, because nobody saw the video until she was dead for 1.5 years. It was only made public in November of 2023, probably as a result of a legal FOIA request, which they can no longer block once the case is closed for too long.
    2
  636. Can you even name any "media" that published this arrest while she was alive?
    2
  637. Oh, I completely agree. I just don't know how they could stop it. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  638. Huh? The cops came after multiple calls regarding this issue. They took the woman away from the restaurant to reduce embarrassment in front of others. And, with the exception of needing to go back through the restaurant in order to get out to the front again, they generally kept her out of view, and treated her just fine. And, you have your facts backward. According to witnesses, the woman was the one walking back and forth, looking for someplace to do this, and then decided to plop down in front of a family. The family wasn't walking, she was.
    2
  639. Huh? Freedom of Information Act. I mean, it's as if you're proud to know nothing. Good grief. And, by the way, the video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    2
  640. Well, maybe if she bothered to show up in court, that might have been part of the negotiation.
    2
  641. Even sadder that people read and write at the level of 2nd graders, and don't bother to actually understand the facts of what happened before coming to a conclusion.
    2
  642. Why do you think it was discreet? Because she said so while trying to avoid getting her millionth arrest?
    2
  643. Another proud graduate of YouTube University Law School, I see.
    2
  644. Not a criminal? So, her felony prison term in 2018 in Flordia? Her record for stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, other thefts, open warrants, etc.? No? Those don't count?
    2
  645. Well, first of all, one of the witnesses said that, yes, she intentionally plopped down in front of people to do this. They said she wandered up and down the beach a few times, then chose a spot in view of others. Secondly, one of the "audience" was able to capture it on video, and showed the video to the police. The arrest report describes it as a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Personally, I tend to trust innocent bystanders and police more than I trust a convicted felon who was trying to get out of her millionth arrest. The "nobody was around" comment was no different than when anybody else says "I didn't do it" while caught red handed.
    2
  646. As for harm to her family, I'm sorry, but she did the worst harm a decade ago when she ditched her career and family (husband and two sons, one by a different father) to live a life of drugs and crime. Why do you suppose nobody even knew she had taken her own life for so long? The landlord had to open her apartment and discover her body when she wasn't paying rent. No family or friends were even looking for her as she was rotting away. According to the interviews, her husband and son didn't even attend her funeral, because she had abandoned the family so long ago.
    2
  647. And, just making sure you knew this already... after her felony record and all of the various other arrests, it's pretty difficult to get a straight job, right? So, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, other interviews say that she was also, ya know, taking "private" transactions. I mean, not that I'm passing judgement on that basis, but, facing reality here, is it REALLY that difficult to make the leap that she may have intentionally been putting on a show?
    2
  648. They allow people to crank in front of children in public there?
    2
  649. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  650. Oh, and you clearly also don't know that she served a felony prison term about 6 years ago, and had an arrest record a mile long. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Failures to appear. Other thefts. I mean, you didn't REALLY believe the "innocent soccer mom" story they're portraying, did you?
    2
  651. I am angry at you for supporting crime.
    2
  652. But, the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  653. Yup. That's exactly what this is.
    2
  654. For me, it's not even about the woman. It's about the general people who watch the 94 second video and let themselves be manipulated so easily, instantly supporting the criminal and disparage the good guys. It's ridiculous. Reading the arrest report, and 5 minutes on Google, would completely turn their opinions around. But, Inside Edition knows that 98% of viewers will never fact-check a single thing they say.
    2
  655. Then you're half way to understanding. To get you the other half of the way, I'll just say this: Inside Edition is trash news. The arrest video wasn't released until she was long dead for 1.5 years. They ask the question, "was she shamed into this?" But, they never answer their own question. They want you to think the question IS the answer. The real answer is "no."
    2
  656. The way she was treated? It ruined her life? Who treated her badly? And, I think she ruined her life when she decided 15 years ago to leave her friends and family to live a life of crime and drugs instead. Her felony prison term in 2018 didn't help either. But, again, exactly what do you mean by "the way she was treated"?
    2
  657. Yeah, leave those guys alone when they're doing the same thing at a playground. Right?
    2
  658. Huh? She gave up her realtor career (and her family, husband, 6 month old son, another son, etc.) more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. She served a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She had a million other arrests and convictions and judgements. And, you're sitting there talking about "reputation"?
    2
  659. Who? Inside Edition? They never even touched this story until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    2
  660.  @shock75wave14  So? How have I done or wrote anything wrong (in your mind)?
    2
  661.  @shock75wave14  Then you've misunderstood. I wish none of this was ever on the news. I don't wish suicide upon anybody. But, if Inside Edition is going to make money from someone's death, I don't appreciate that they skew the story and misrepresent things in order to do it.
    2
  662.  @shock75wave14  Let me reword this a bit. A fake story about "an innocent soccer mom committed suicide due to evil police" doesn't do anybody any good in life. It just makes money for Inside Edition. It just fosters public mistrust. It garners sympathy in the wrong directions. But, an honest reporting of "a life of drugs and crime leads to suicide" actually would help people. But, sadly, those stories don't go viral. What goes viral is the fake story about the innocent soccer mom. I don't want either woman (the real criminal version, or the fake soccer mom version) to commit suicide. But, Inside Edition is doing the public a disservice by portraying the fake version, just in the interest of making more ad revenue.
    2
  663.  @shock75wave14  All good.
    2
  664.  Damage_Inc.883  Mainly, I'm just interested in how much Inside Edition skews their stories, and how easy it is to make the public blindly believe them.
    2
  665.  Damage_Inc.883  I have sympathy also. But, I also tend to hold people accountable for themselves.
    2
  666. And, you believe that story, why? Because the woman who was in the middle of being arrested said so? Multiple people reported this incident to the police. One woman used her cell phone to take a video recording of it. She showed it to the police, who described it in their arrest report. It said that it was a very loud and public display, in full view of multiple people. This is a far cry different than the version she's telling while trying to get out of being arrested. So, I'll ask again, what reason do you have to believe her?
    2
  667. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  668. But, this news outlet never even ran the story until 1.5 years after she was dead. So, um, no.
    2
  669. The release of the bodycam footage did not happen until 2.5 years later. By then, she had already been dead for 1.5 years. As for not fighting the charges, she handled this arrest the same as she handled her other million arrests, she was released, then didn't show up at court. Almost no reporters covered this incident until the bodycam footage was released, but, as I said, that wasn't until she was long dead already. You have absolutely, positively, no clue, do you?
    2
  670. First of all, no news or social media covered this story until after she was dead 1.5 years. So, no, she wasn't shamed to death. Inside Edition will have you believe the question "was she shamed?" IS the answer. But, the actual answer is "no" (and they know it). But, that doesn't go viral, so, they just asked the question and never answered it. Only one obscure website I've never even heard of published a small blog posting about it while she was alive. The viral videos came 2.5 years later, long after she was dead. As for first offense (?), um, no. Not by a mile. She served some felony time in prison for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long. Multiple judgements against her for theft. Open warrants for her arrest for various failures to appear. Attempts to change her name to evade the police. Numerous drug and alcohol charges. Her landlord says that her "career" was being a stripper at the local club (and it's suspected/assumed that she also made money on the side for one-on-one time). Apparently, she decided to put on a similar show at the beach.
    2
  671. What's the basis for the suit?
    2
  672. And, you believe that, why? Because Inside Edition told you? July 1, 2021 = arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video went public. Then the major media covered it. Only very small obscure articles were written about her while she was alive. Doubtful she suffered any shame from them.
    2
  673. And, you WOULDN'T report someone putting on a show in front of children? Huh?
    2
  674. It's a bit old school, but, yeah, "their" is considered a neutral possessive pronoun, even if the subject is singular.
    2
  675. I am not aware for certain, but, with her extensive criminal record, and multiple open arrests, I'd tend to doubt she could legally move. But, it's a moot point anyway. She gave up her career and family more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs. I doubt she sold any houses in the last decade, especially after her prison term about 6 years ago. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment.
    2
  676. The arrest video was posted online on November 24, 2023. Her death was in March, 2022. So, um, no.
    2
  677. Really? Multiple people called the police. One of the "audience" even recorded it on video, and showed the video to the police. And, you've come to YouTube comments to declare that the police did their jobs wrong?
    2
  678. Huh? What do you believe the cops did wrong?
    2
  679. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released from legal FOIA request.
    2
  680. Freedom of Information Act. But, this video wasn't released until after she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  681. A) Why would you think you know anything about her intentions? Because of what she sad while trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time? B) It was handled correctly, and her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. The arrest video wasn't even released to the public until 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  682. Did you just double down? As I explained, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after her death. The police handled everything 100% correctly. You said you believed her, and that she didn't have bad intentions. Why do you believe the words of a convicted felon who served a prison term for stealing cars, and who has an arrest record a mile long?
    2
  683. See, we live in this thing called a "society," in which we pay these people called "police," to handle these things called "crimes."
    2
  684. There were three officers, not two. And, why do you blame them? What EXACTLY do you think they should have done differently?
    2
  685. Oh, get real. Nobody is going up to someone in the middle of doing that. You wouldn't do that for a guy doing that at a playground, and you wouldn't do that for a woman on a beach. And, why do you believe she thought nobody was around? Because she said so, while trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  686. Sure, if that actually happened. But, since virtually no media even covered this story while she was alive, yeah, that kinda negates your point.
    2
  687.  @1337-exe  No, dewdrop. She's responsible for her own actions.
    2
  688. They'd think Inside Edition is trash news.
    2
  689. Well, I certainly agree that media should never have shown any of it. But, frankly, I'm not sure what we could do about it, what with the Freedom of Information Act. But, hold on just a second here. What did the release of the video have to do with bullying her? This arrest = July 21, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. The arrest video was released = November 24, 2023. How do you bully someone who has been dead 1.5 years?
    2
  690. Huh? What media would that be?
    2
  691. She abandoned her career and family about a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. She spent some felony time in prison for stealing cars. She had a bunch of judgements against her for other thefts and crimes. She had an arrest record a mile long. And, failing to appear in court seemed like the normal way she handled all of her arrests, because there were open warrants, and again, she didn't appear for this arrest either. It's difficult for a convicted felon with her arrest record to get a job, so, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. According to her neighbors, she also took "private" cash encounters in her apartment with bunches of men. The witnesses of this particular crime said it looked intentional, and one of them recorded it and showed the video to the police. Apparently, the video didn't match her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. Quite to the contrary, it was a loud act in view of multiple people including children. So, yeah, I'd say you're correct.
    2
  692. That's some mighty big libel there, care to provide evidence?
    2
  693. Well, the only saving grace is that nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    2
  694. She hadn't sold a house for about a decade. But, she gave that life up for a life of drugs and crime instead.
    2
  695. It's called a FOIA request. And, whoever first uploaded it has deleted his/her channel. And, sorry, but her death had nothing to do with this video. Arrest = July 2021 Suicide = March 2022 Arrest video made public = November 2023 Stop believing nonsense you see on Inside Edition.
    2
  696. Who killed her? And, how?
    2
  697. Naw, they were her own handprints. And, the "murder" story has way too many flaws. The timeline doesn't match up, nor the circumstances. Unfortunately, yes, she was stumbling around for a while before bleeding out. Sad.
    2
  698.  @firstmotorhome8024  Well, I seriously doubt this woman even knew what "shame" was. I mean, did you read the police report, in which they describe the video of this beach incident? It doesn't exactly match her story about a discreet little act with nobody around. It describes the video as a very loud and very public display in front of multiple people including children. I mean, there's a reason multiple people called the police when this was happening. And, she didn't exactly feel shame over her prior arrest record for stealing cars and public drunkenness. And, flopping down on a public beach and putting on a show for multiple people including children... yeah... again, I doubt "shame" was even in her vocabulary.
    2
  699. Yeah, blame the victims, never the criminals.
    2
  700.  @NeverStartTradingOptions  The law disagrees.
    2
  701. Huh? They arrested her. How is that "bullying"?
    2
  702. "permitted her to put clothes on; asked her to step outside" That's what she was wearing. And, yes, they took her away from the restaurant, away from people. You don't see others in this video, do you? Well, that's because they already did exactly what you asked for.
    2
  703. "issued a fine" "cannot go to a beach again" Really? That's how you think the law works? No due process? No judge or jury? Officers decide for themselves what the penalties should or shouldn't be?
    2
  704. "by the Police and the judicial system" They followed procedure correctly. And, sorry, but, there is no judicial system if she refuses to show up in court (which is what happened in this case, as well as lots of her prior arrests, given the open warrants she had). She had actually been trying to change her name for years to duck the legal system, but, they wouldn't let her because of her prison record and her continuous crimes before and after, and the fact that she seemed to never show up for court dates. How can the judicial system do their jobs when she keeps refusing to show up?
    2
  705. How ironic is it that you complain that the judicial system didn't do their jobs, while simultaneously you suggest that the officers should have bypassed the judicial system altogether and issue fines and penalties themselves? You get your jollies by pretending to know things you don't, eh?
    2
  706. Good grief. This is a highly modified story. She left her family (husband, 6 month old son, and another son) about 15 years ago to lead a life of crime and drugs. Stealing cars, bunches of alcohol and drug charges, other thefts, judgements against her both civilly and criminally. She spent a felony term in a Florida prison in 2018. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah), and neighbors said she did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat. And, with her open warrants, sorry, but she was going to get arrested either way.
    2
  707. Oh, and by the way, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was gone for 1.5 years by then. Nobody saw it while she was alive. So, I fail to see how she was "embarrassed" by it.
    2
  708. Don't pretend you've seen the video. It was never released. And, the arrest report says the exact opposite.
    2
  709. OK, how? Who? On what basis?
    2
  710. Blame the victim?
    2
  711. So, the criminal herself isn't responsible for her own actions?
    2
  712. Probably. But, she was a convicted felon who spent time in prison. So, I don't think she could legally have the gun she had anyway.
    2
  713. Um, ok, maybe. But, what's the basis? I don't quite get it.
    2
  714. Thanks, I'll stick with reading the police reports, the medical examiners reports. Anybody who believes claptrap they see in a sensationalist YouTube video like this is nuts. And, sorry, but I still don't understand what the lawsuit would even allege. The arrest was in July of 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The arrest video was made public in November of 2023. I'm sorry if you fell for some garbage you saw in a YouTube video that has twisted the facts and played word games to get ad revenue, but, again, the floor is yours... what EXACTLY is the basis for a lawsuit?
    2
  715. No. What you're seeing is a choreographed media circus story. Other than a couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of, no news outlet even covered this story when she was alive. She died more than 2 years ago. But, the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. That's when the media jumped on it, and they wanted two viral video rounds instead of just one. So, they released the initial viral story a few months ago without mentioning that she was already dead. Then, they released the "updated" video to say that she had killed herself, letting the gullible public believe that the first round of videos caused the suicide. See? Two viral videos for the price of one. In reality, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, it didn't cause any shame to her at all. And, she was a very troubled person with an extensive criminal background, and her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. But, "sweet and innocent pretty soccer mom kills herself after evil police arrest her" goes viral. "Convicted felon who cannot stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested yet again, and kills herself a year later in an unrelated incident" doesn't go viral.
    2
  716. Normal citizen? She was a convicted felon for stealing cars, and when she got out of prison, continued her crime spree until she died.
    2
  717. Yeah, when you see a guy at a playground cranking in front of kids, just go ask him to go home, nothing else.
    2
  718. The police released the video because the Freedom of Information Act says they must. They blocked its release for 2.5 years, though. It was only released 1.5 years AFTER she died, because the investigation had been closed long enough that they could no longer block it. Get your facts right.
    2
  719. Secondly, why do you believe her claims about nobody being around? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison about 6 years ago, with a million arrests before and after. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. The list goes on. Frankly, I'm going to trust the innocent bystanders who took video of the incident, and the police, before I'm trusting this woman.
    2
  720. Well, when they arrest you, you get put into cuffs, period. And, nobody posted the arrest video online until long after she was dead.
    2
  721. Thank you for your amazing expert opinions. You're a true hero for coming to YouTube to share your thoughts. 1) Multiple people called the police during this incident. One of the crowd that saw her took video of the incident. They showed that video to the police. It is described in the police report as a very loud and very public display in view of multiple people including children. So, no, it wasn't a matter of "he said she said." They had it on video. 2) You don't get warnings for crimes. You can get a warning for an infraction. But, for crimes, there's either probable cause, or there isn't. I don't think you know the difference between crimes and infractions. But, you keep on bringing your opinions to YouTube. Thanks a million, you're definitely a hero.
    2
  722. Hello YouTube Law School graduate. It's called The Freedom of Information Act. Your suit means nothing. Furthermore, the video wasn't released until she was already dead for 1.5 years. But, keep on pretending to know things you don't. That's what you YouTube attorneys do best.
    2
  723. You're preaching to the wrong choir. This is an Inside Edition video, where the fans gobble up every piece of silly nonsense they see. "Logic" isn't their thing. They feel whatever Inside Edition tells them to feel.
    2
  724. Wrong. The cops successfully prevented the arrest video from being seen by the public for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years AFTER she died. But, eventually, they can no longer block legal Freedom of Information Act requests after a case has been closed for so long, and they had to release it. July 1, 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. She suffered ZERO shame from the release of the arrest video, because it wasn't released until long after she was dead. Take your obvious hatred somewhere else.
    2
  725. And the other witnesses who called the police? Huh? Did you think they dispatched 3 officers out of the blue?
    2
  726. Well, maybe that's all YOU know, but, the rest of the world knows other things.
    2
  727. Flagged as misinformation.
    2
  728. The witnesses and the video they took of the event disagree with you. And, nobody saw the arrest video until 1.5 years after her death.
    2
  729. Inside Edition never even covered it until 1.5 years AFTER her death.
    2
  730. I swear... most people who comment on this video have got to be the most gullible people alive. This woman was a career criminal who did a felony prison term in Florida in 2018. She abandoned her family and friends about 15 years ago to live a life of crime and drugs, leaving behind a husband, 6 month old son, and another son. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (stripper) at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" in her apartment with parades of paying men. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat. Multiple witnesses called this in to the police. One of them even recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police (never released due to graphic content). This arrest happened on July 1, 2021. She decided to exit this world sometime in February or March of 2022. This arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023, about 1.5 years after she was already dead. The reason they don't know the exact date (or even which month) was because she had no family or friends at that point who cared enough to even find out what happened to her when she went missing, and she wasn't found until her landlord went into the apartment to collect overdue rent. No, there was no "public shame" that resulted from this video, because nobody saw the video until long after she died. Yes, her mugshot was published on a couple of obscure blogs I've never heard of. But, so what? This was, by far, nowhere near her first arrest. She had been busted for stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, other thefts, etc., and had quite a long record. She had been trying to change her name, but the courts rejected it because of her criminal history. She had multiple judgements against her, both civilly and criminally. Yet, all Inside Edition needs to do is ask the question "was she shamed to death?" They never answer their own question, they just spin the story, show a couple of clips of her trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, and tell people she was a real estate agent (even though she hadn't sold a house in over a decade), and the public just gobbles it up. Good grief. STOP FALLING FOR WHATEVER THE MEDIA SAYS!!!
    2
  731. Says who? Her? One of the witnesses recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her version.
    2
  732. First of all, the Freedom of Information act REQUIRES that the police release the video. Secondly, it wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. But, you keep on pretending to know things you don't.
    2
  733. Well, until you looked up what really caused all of this, and not just believe everything Inside Edition tells you.
    2
  734. And, you believe that, why? Because the woman said she didn't think anybody was around, while she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again?
    2
  735. So, you want them to also be therapists?
    2
  736. Um, ok, but, do you know the actual story, or just this deceptive joke of a story from this video? I mean, start with the fact that she waited almost a year after this arrest before she decided to end it all, and that the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after that. Then, dive into her extensive criminal history, her time spent in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, etc. And, then deal with the fact that her neighbors said she was a "dancer" (yes, that kind) who did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. In all probability, she was making "public beach" content for her fans. You're welcome to still be mortified, but, let's face the reality, not the fantasy of an innocent soccer mom shown in this video.
    2
  737. Huh? Read the police report. Good grief. Yes, one of the audience recorded it on video, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a discreet act with nobody around.
    2
  738. This event was on July 1, 2021. She was no longer alive about a year later, in March of 2022. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023.
    2
  739. And, you think she didn't know anybody was around, why? Because the convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long said so while she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  740. Probably as a result of a legal FOIA request. But, the silver lining is that it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. So, she never lived to see any shame from the release of the arrest video.
    2
  741. Sure, if you trust trash TV like Inside Edition.
    2
  742. Well, I believe that's the same neighbor who thinks she was murdered, rather than a suicide. Not the brightest bulb.
    2
  743. The "media outlets" never reported a darned thing until 1.5 years after she died. The arrest video wasn't made public until about a month ago. She died 1.5 years ago. The only exception is "The Smoking Gun," with an obscure article that never went viral or caused any real distress. The goal the media accomplished was to generate ad revenue by making people like you believe utter nonsense.
    2
  744. Freedom of Information Act. And, it's not up to the police to do the blurring, it's up to the media who posts it.
    2
  745. Putting on a public show in front of people that included children. But, you're right if you're saying that's not all that horrific. I'd say all of her other million prior arrests were more serious than this one.
    2
  746. If you see a guy cranking at the playground, leave him alone! He wants to do that tomorrow also. Right?
    2
  747. Well, it WASN'T "broadcasted all over" until about 2.5 years later. The arrest took place in July of 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. The arrest video went public in November of 2023. The arrest video had nothing to do with the suicide.
    2
  748. Multiple people called the police. One in the "audience" recorded it on her cell phone, and showed the police, and described that the woman was going up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, then deliberately plopped down near a family with children, and put on a show. According to her landlord, those shows were part of her actual profession. I guess with her mile long arrest record, and her prison term for stealing cars, being a convicted felon, with a pile of judgements against her for various thefts and drugs and alcohol, it's probably pretty difficult to get a real job. But, I'll bite, why do you believe the woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time? Because she said nobody was around? Isn't that just another form of, "I didn't do it"? As for releasing the video, well, I'd love to hear how you think the police can defy the Freedom of Information Act. Will you explain? They had already blocked its release for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 of those years. At that point, they can't block a legal FOIA request any longer. But, do explain. You're the legal expert here, not me.
    2
  749. Your hatred is showing.
    2
  750. The difference is that one of the "audience" caught it on video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match the version about a discreet act with nobody around as the woman is trying to tell as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    2
  751. Sorry, but, no, you didn't see the arrest video while she was alive. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after her death. This was just a little media trick. She died in March of 2022. The video was made public on November 24, 2023. So, what the media did was show the arrest video without telling you that she was already dead. Then, they posted these "updates" a few weeks later, saying she committed suicide.
    2
  752. Never been arrested: You're wrong. They absolutely arrest for this misdemeanor. There's no such "ticket" for this crime. And, with all of her open warrants, did they really have much of a choice anyway?
    2
  753. humiliate her: Huh? The police politely took her away from the restaurant and questioned her far away from other people. They then blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, until they could no longer block FOIA requests. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  754. never should have admitted to it: Huh? One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Also, I'll bet she was hoping to cry her way out of it before they looked up her prison record and all of the open warrants. Staying silent = they'd definitely look her up. Admitting it and crying her way out of it = 50/50 odds that they'll just let her go without looking her up.
    2
  755. MULTIPLE people called this in to complain, not just one. She put on a show in front of an audience that included CHILDREN.
    2
  756. You included, right?
    2
  757. Wow, were you intentionally trying to get every sentence wrong? Or, was it accidental? Multiple people called the police. One witness said she walked up and down the beach, and intentionally chose a spot in front of people. Another witness recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their police report as a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. I'm sorry if that doesn't match the version being told by the woman who was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, but, yeah, I think I'll trust the police and innocent bystanders more than I'd trust a convicted felon who has been on a crime spree for the last decade. I mean, you do know that she gave up her family and career to live a life of drugs and crime, right? And, after getting out of prison for stealing cars, she continued to get arrested for various other thefts and different crimes. She had warrants for her arrest for numerous failures to appear in court. And, after all of that, it's tough to get a straight job, right? So, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. I mean, is it THAT much of a leap to conclude that maybe she wasn't so discreet and innocent on that beach after all?
    2
  758. Wow. You're an amazing detective with some extremely powerful deductive abilities. July 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video released to the public = November 2023. It's probably because the police can no longer block a legal FOIA request after the case is closed long enough. And, since she was already dead for 1.5 years, they can no longer block its release. She suffered ZERO shame over the release of this video, because she was long dead before anybody ever saw it.
    2
  759. Tell me, if it was a man at a playground, would you say the same thing about the people who call the police?
    2
  760. Would you say that if it was a man in a playground? "Just leave him alone, kids. We'll just go to a different playground. Leave him to do his thing."
    2
  761. Yes, agreed. It's amazing to me about how many people blame police for her death. The police did everything they were supposed to do. Multiple people called the police for this incident. The woman not only did this in public, but, it was public enough that one of the "audience" was able to capture it on video and show the police. The description in their arrest report just doesn't match this woman's story about a quiet secluded thing with nobody around. They say it shows a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. Yet, many of the viewers blame the police for doing their jobs? Good grief. The woman had a mile long legal record of arrests, prison time for stealing cars, legal judgments against her for various thefts, drugs and alcohol, etc. Yet, the commenters in this video actually believe the woman when she says nobody was around, and scold the police for arresting her... as if this was their first time ever hearing a criminal say, "I didn't do it." It's ridiculous.
    2
  762. a) It wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years. b) Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  763. Honest? She claimed she was alone. This greatly differs from the statements given by the witnesses, one of whom recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Sounds more like she was making "public beach" content for her fans, than this innocent soccer mom version they're pretending in this video.
    2
  764. You have your order of events wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    2
  765. 1) In all likelihood, that was the point of putting on the show in the first place. 2) One of the audience showed the video to the police. Between that, and her mile long existing arrest record and open warrants, she was getting arrested no matter what.
    2
  766. It's very difficult to take you seriously when you call the police "aggressive." They calmly took her away from the restaurant so nobody could see/hear what was going on. And, they protected the privacy of the arrest video for 2.5 years (which was long after she was dead), until a FOIA request mandated its release. That's not aggressive, dewdrop.
    2
  767. Yes, dewdrop. Her history IS relevant, because it included the open arrest warrants.
    2
  768. It was a misdemeanor. There is no such thing as a warning for this crime.
    2
  769. Nobody saw the video while she was alive, so, it was pretty irrelevant to her decision a year later to say goodbye. And, what's so special about this arrest that was different than her other million arrests? She didn't say goodbye after being in prison 6 years ago. But, THIS little arrest did the trick?
    2
  770. Well, you're half right anyway. Yes, people get arrested for aggravated misdemeanors.
    2
  771. ​ @X-Prime123  Well, I'm not the one you were addressing, but, I have no trouble claiming moral superiority either. She left her career and family about a decade ago, including a 6 month old son, a husband, and another boy from a prior father, in order to live a life of drugs and crime. She ended up serving a felony prison term for stealing cars. And, when she got out of prison, she continued her drug and crime spree until she died. There were multiple judgements against her for various thefts, an arrest record a mile long for various things including drug and alcohol charges, and numerous failures to appear in court (including this particular arrest, which she never showed up for her hearing). She tried changing her name a few times to evade police. And, after all of that, yeah, it's difficult to get a straight job. So, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, interviews with neighbors said that she did "private" cash transactions out of her apartment also. Witnesses of this incident said it seemed like she intentionally chose a spot in view of others. And, one witness recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the arrest report describes a very different version than the discreet "nobody was around" version as told by the felon who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    2
  772. Multiple people called the police for this incident. One of them even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It's described in their police report as a loud and public act in front of multiple people, including children. I'm sorry if this differs from the words spoken by a convicted felon who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, but, yeah, time to wake up to reality. People often say just about anything to try to wiggle out of arrests. There's no reason for you to believe her.
    2
  773. And, you believe she was alone, why? Because she said so as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? The witnesses disagree, and one of them recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. She wasn't alone. She was putting on a very loud show in view of multiple people including children. And, sorry, but the arrest video wasn't released until long after she died. So, it had nothing to do with taking her life. She did that all by herself, and you should stop blaming others.
    2
  774. Yet, you cannot actually name any of those levels?
    2
  775. Well, given that this arrest took place in July of 2021, her suicide was in March of 2022, and the video wasn't released to the public until November of 2023, yeah, I think it's safe to say that this incident had nothing to do with her suicide.
    2
  776. Well, that's only if you believe the words of someone who was trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time. Multiple people called the police for this incident. And, one of the witnesses said that the woman wandered up and down the beach a few times, looking for a spot, and picked one in view of a family. Furthermore, one of the "audience" recorded the event, and showed the video to the police, who then described the video as a very loud show in view of multiple people including children. I wasn't there, but, I think I'd side with the innocent bystanders who captured it on video, rather than the words from a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long, trying to avoid getting arrested again.
    2
  777. No, you have fallen for a simple media trick. She died more than 2 years ago. But, the arrest video was just released on November 24, 2023. They wanted two viral rounds for the price of one. So, they released the first round to talk about the arrest (without mentioning she was already dead). Then, they released the "update" to say that she committed suicide (and falsely let you believe that it was the first round of videos that caused it). Just look up the dates. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide (unrelated) = March, 2022. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request. It was only after then that things went viral. She was long dead before just about anybody knew anything about it. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    2
  778. Yeah, I hope you have the same reaction when they arrest a guy cranking it at a playground in front of kids.
    2
  779. Well, you're close, but not quite. They knew when they aired the first story that she was already dead. But, they chose not to reveal that fact. So, they had one viral round of the fake story, and then published another viral round of the fake story with the "update" that she had killed herself. In reality, the story they're presenting was never accurate from the start, and they knew darned well that she was already dead when they aired the first story, but wanted to get two rounds for the price of one.
    2
  780. Well, what mainstream media even touched this story while she was alive? Can you name even ONE mainstream media? (Hint: no, you cannot.) Secondly, I'd say that the mainstream media is painting a much better picture of this woman than reality. She abandoned her family (including a 6 month old boy, a husband, and another boy) and career in order to live a life of crime and drugs, had a prison record and a million other arrests. She was almost undoubtedly making "public beach" content for her adult fans in this incident. But, the media paints her out to be an innocent soccer mom.
    2
  781. There was nothing on YouTube about her before she died. She died more than 2 years ago.
    2
  782.  @417Theory  Dewdrop, I was pointing out that she experienced ZERO "shame" from the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  783. You seem to be answering your own statement. The police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. No regrets required. And, if you want to make it so that the video never gets released, even long after her death, then that means you need to repeal the Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  784. Well, the facts differ from your opinion. The fact is that a woman in the "audience" video recorded the incident with her cell phone and showed that video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. This differs quite a bit from your version. But, where did you get your version anyway? From the few selected words spoken by a woman trying to avoid getting arrested again? Thanks, I'll stick with the witnesses, the fact that they took video of the incident, and the police report itself. If you want to put your faith in some woman with an arrest record of stealing cars and public drunkenness, hey, that's fine, you're welcome to do that. But, yeah, it seemed rather intentional to me. But, guess what? Intent doesn't matter anyway.
    2
  785. Probably not. Almost no media even covered this story until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She's been dead for 2 years.
    2
  786. The way WHO treated her? What should "they" have done differently?
    2
  787. Well, then you'll be happy to learn that this story never actually answers the question it's asking, and in reality, it didn't happen the way they're pretending. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = she decided to leave the world. November 24, 2023 = arrest video was released. Nobody saw it while she was alive, and being "internet famous" didn't come until 1.5 years after she was gone.
    2
  788. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    2
  789. It is blocking me from talking about it. Scroll down in the comments a bit (sorted by newest). You'll find out what her "job" was, and what she did with her family.
    2
  790. Trying one last time: no family or friends, life of crime instead, "job" was a stripper.
    2
  791. Huh? She lost everything long before this. You're wrong anyway, because she was never bullied over this arrest, because almost nobody knew about it until she was dead for 1.5 years. But, she had abandoned her family and career long before this arrest. She had a rather long arrest/prison/legal history going back to almost a decade ago. She did time in prison for stealing cars. She had judgements against her for various thefts. "Failure to appear" seemed to be her main objective on how to handle her legal issues. A long history of drugs and alcohol. But, you just keep on believing Inside Edition.
    2
  792. Photos must be released immediately. Videos are usually blocked until the investigation is complete. Nobody is getting a lawsuit. There's no case here.
    2
  793. Because they're making lots of ad revenue.
    2
  794. And, you believe that, why? Because the woman said so, while attempting to avoid being arrested for the millionth time?
    2
  795. What humiliation? This barely got any press until long after she was dead. And, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club... hardly a good career choice for someone who is easily shamed, huh?
    2
  796. Doubtful. Virtually no media covered this while she was alive. And, if she didn't feel shame after all of her prior arrests and prison term, it's farfetched to think she'd feel ashamed about this.
    2
  797. Persecution? How? She didn't appear in court. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until long after she died.
    2
  798. And, on what planet is a public beach in view of children "not a public space"?
    2
  799. "I believe she is innocent" So, her felony term in prison 6 years ago? Her mile long record? Stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear, open warrants, other thefts, civil judgements... those, she was guilty. But, THIS TIME, she's innocent?
    2
  800. What's the basis for the suit?
    2
  801. Do you really not understand what a bodycam is?
    2
  802. The bodycam footage wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. And, sorry, but with her mile long arrest and felony prison record, I think she'd be pretty used to cuffs by then.
    2
  803. Huh? Only one obscure website posted a clip about it. The arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. What humiliation do you really think she suffered, and why do you think it? Because Inside Edition said so?
    2
  804. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw the arrest video when she was alive. So, um, no.
    2
  805. They did protect her privacy. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and, at that point, the investigation was closed long enough (she was long dead by then) such that they could no longer block a legal FOIA request.
    2
  806. Wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to legal FOIA request.
    2
  807. No. One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police.
    2
  808. Well, Inside Edition never ran the story until 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, the woman suffered no humiliation from them. The same is true of 99.9% of the media. Almost zero media covered this while she was alive. There were a couple of obscure blogs that listed the arrest. But, for the most part, the media didn't touch this until the arrest video was released (again, long after she died).
    2
  809. Huh? A warning for an aggravated misdemeanor? And, just who's the recipient of this suit of yours? The sky? Clouds? The sand? Certainly, you can't mean the police. With her extensive criminal history, if she wasn't arrested for this crime, she'd have been arrested for open warrants on other prior arrests.
    2
  810. Except, nobody saw this arrest video until after she was dead for 1.5 years. So.... yeah, um, no.
    2
  811. Yeah, but, FYI, none of this went viral, and the video wasn't released, until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    2
  812. Huh? She already had a criminal record a mile long. She served a felony term in a Florida prison around 6 years ago. Her landlord said her "job" was as a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) at a local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" with bunches of men out of her apartment. I don't think you lose those "jobs" from this incident. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans during this incident, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  813. You listed infractions. What she did was a crime. You need to learn the difference between an infraction and a crime.
    2
  814. Well, then it gets even sadder, because she lived through the gunshot wound for a while, stumbling around, before finally bled out.
    2
  815. Yes, it was in front of children.
    2
  816. Um, no. This incident happened on July 1, 2021. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023 (2.5 years later). Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    2
  817. She wouldn't get a warning for this, sorry. But, it doesn't matter. With all of her prior arrests and open warrants, they had no choice but to take her in.
    2
  818. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  819. Well, she abandoned her family about a decade ago because she wanted to live a life of partying, drugs, and crime. And, she ruined her own life, no blame belongs to others.
    2
  820. They didn't. They probably released it as a result of a legal FOIA request. The original channel that published it is gone now. But, at least the police kept the video private for as long as possible. It wasn't released until 2.5 years after the incident, which was also 1.5 years after the suicide. The poor woman never had to suffer any shame from the release of the arrest video, because nobody ever saw it until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    2
  821. Just a quick check here: you do know some of the details Inside Edition omits: she had an arrest history a mile long, spent a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, her landlord said she was a "dancer" (ya know), and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  822. The planet is turning into a pile of people who read and write at the level of 2nd graders, don't know the difference between "there" and "their" and "they're," and make judgements about situations they know absolutely nothing about, because they blindly trusted some garbage they saw on Inside Edition.
    2
  823. You believe her story about trying to hide it, why? Because she said so, as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content.
    2
  824. What gave it away? The fact that she abandoned her family and career more than a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime? Or, her mile long criminal record including a felony term in a Florida prison and a million other arrests?
    2
  825.  @australiaplus9629  July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request.
    2
  826. Yes. I agree. But, the Freedom of Information Act would need to be repealed in order to change this.
    2
  827. Well, at least nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive.
    2
  828. Huh? Why?
    2
  829. How'd the news manage that, when no news even covered this story until long after she died?
    2
  830. By "symptom," do you mean "I need to make money from making 'public beach' content"?
    2
  831. What discretion did the police lack?
    2
  832. I'll add to what you said: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. She suffered nearly zero shame from the arrest, because none of the major news outlets even covered it until after the arrest video was released, and nobody saw it while she was alive. Side note: she was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other various arrests, and according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, and was trying to cry her way out of an arrest before they looked her up and found open warrants.
    2
  833. Huh? This incident didn't hit social media until 1.5 years after she died. You don't blindly believe the tone set forth in videos made by Inside Edition, do you? Arrest = July 2021 Suicide = March 2022 Arrest video made public = November 2023 If you believe any claptrap you see on Inside Edition, would you like to buy a bridge I have for sale?
    2
  834. People who want to make "public beach" video content.
    2
  835. Yes, and I wasn't joking. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. So, what I said makes sense.
    2
  836. The words you were looking for were, "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    2
  837. The arrest video was released 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died. How do you get consent from a dead person?
    2
  838. Your instinct is correct. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had a million arrests and other problems. It's quite doubtful this incident had anything to do with her suicide, especially since it never went viral until 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  839. And, if those people actually commit "an act" at those parades, then they get arrested also.
    2
  840. So, "the news" should pay millions because you have decided what's newsworthy?
    2
  841. Nope. It's public record. It wasn't released until November 24, 2023. There were some blogs that posted about this incident (without the arrest video). And, I wouldn't be surprised if someone either showed some other video of someone else in a similar situation, or maybe found a different arrest video of her (she was arrested a million times over the past decade or so). But, this particular arrest video wasn't seen by anybody until November 24, 2023.
    2
  842. Well, maybe if you had a literacy level beyond 2nd graders, you might be capable of looking this stuff up and understanding it better.
    2
  843. The Freedom of Information Act requires it. But, just checking here, you do know that it wasn't released until November 24, 2023, right? You do know she died almost 2 years ago, right?
    2
  844. She's dead. She's been dead for almost 2 years. Her life was ruined long before any media was hunting for clicks.
    2
  845. Really? A warning for a crime?
    2
  846. Why? Were you one of her "customers"?
    2
  847. Huh? One of the audience took video of the incident and gave it to the police. What more do you want?
    2
  848. Of really? Of couldn't of cops written of a report of that of said otherwise? Of your of memory of not very good of. Of there were of multiple of callers. Of three of cops were dispatched of of. Of one of the of witnesses gave of a video of to the of cops of the incident. It's of all in the report of that of you could of read of yourself of. And, with of all of her prior of open warrants of, they'd of needed to arrest her of anyway of.
    2
  849. You write like a 2nd grader, and when I mock your own ridiculous words, you don't even get it, and tell ME that I have to learn to write?
    2
  850. Really? They didn't teach you that "of" isn't part of a verb by the 4th grade? Anyway, how about NOT offering advice on topic you know nothing about? The police had complaints from multiple callers. They had video of the "event" itself because one of the callers recorded it. And, she had piles and piles of open warrants because she was a career criminal and convicted felon who served time in prison. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans at the "dance club" where she worked, I'll eat my hat.
    2
  851. Oh? But, you think you know enough to tell ME that I should learn to write a coherent sentence?
    2
  852. The Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you. And, by the way, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. It wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She committed suicide 2 years ago.
    2
  853. Multiple people called the police, not just one family. I mean, you don't actually buy this story she's telling about thinking nobody could see her, do you?
    2
  854. What is the basis for the suit, and against who?
    2
  855. It's up to the network to blur the face. The police must release the video as-is.
    2
  856. The multiple people who called the police, and the one in the "audience" who took the video of the incident, disagree with you. The witnesses said that she wandered up and down the beach looking for someplace to do this, then plopped right down in front of multiple people, children included, and performed. The police saw the video and described it in their report as a very loud and public act in view of people. I'm sorry if that differs from the version being told by a woman who attempting to get out of her millionth arrest. But, yeah, "I didn't do it" is a really common claim. I don't know why you'd blindly believe her??
    2
  857. Huh? Freedom of Information Act. The police don't have a choice. If someone makes a legal FOIA request, they must release it. But, yes, they block it while there's an open investigation. However, given that the arrest was 2.5 years ago, and she was already dead 1.5 years ago, yeah, in November of 2023, they had to release it. The investigation had been closed a long time, and could no longer block the FOIA request.
    2
  858. Yes, there's no shortage of dribble being spewed by bunches of people making spurious videos. There's no evidence that her boyfriend had anything to do with it. And, if you watch some of the videos making that accusation, you'll find that their version of the story is completely wrong.
    2
  859. "No ones fault" Incorrect. It was her fault.
    2
  860. I'm sure they hate you too.
    2
  861. I hope the same happens to you for slander/libel. Dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. The police managed to keep it private. But, eventually, after the investigation had been closed for that much time, they couldn't prevent the legal FOIA request to release the video.
    2
  862. Great person? She was a repeated felon with a mile long record. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Open warrants. Other thefts. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and neighbors said she did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. She served time in a Florida prison in 2018. And, she tried for years to change her name to evade her past, but, due to her record, the courts wouldn't let her.
    2
  863. This news outlet never said a single thing about her while she was alive. This incident = July 1, 2021. She decided to end it all in March of 2022. This video wasn't released to the public until November 24, 2023. That's when they aired the first story about her. So, how much humiliation could she have suffered from it when she wasn't even alive?
    2
  864. Multiple people called the police, not just one family. But, please tell me, if it was a man at a playground, pants down, doing his thing, would you go up and talk to him?
    2
  865. No, her suicide was not related to this arrest, despite the inaccurate picture that Inside Edition falsely paints.
    2
  866. If anybody starts cranking in front of kids at a parade, that person is getting arrested also.
    2
  867. I don't quite understand why such a huge percentage of people pretend to know things they don't. Warning or a ticket for a crime? Um, no. That's for an infraction. For a crime, you get arrested.
    2
  868. Why? The media outlets didn't cover it until long after she was dead.
    2
  869. Dewdrop, multiple people called about this incident. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her story about a quiet incident with nobody around. To the contrary, it was a loud public act in view of multiple people including children. Yes, that's a misdemeanor, and she deserved to be arrested. The witnesses said it was clearly an intentional act. And, sorry if YOU blindly believe criminals who try to say "I didn't do it" when being arrested, but, sane people know better. And, dewdrop, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. She suffered nearly zero shame over it. It wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. And, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions with numerous men in her apartment, um, yeah, I'd hardly believe for a single second that she even knew what "shame" was anyway. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had a mile long arrest record. Why would you believe a single word she says?
    2
  870. Why? What did they do wrong, in your mind?
    2
  871. Sure. And, after being that upset about it, you did nothing whatsoever. This makes it totally believable.
    2
  872. According to the police (who saw the video of the actual event), it was a very loud and graphic display in front of multiple people (including children). Now, get real here, do you actually believe anybody in the "audience" is going to go up to her during this show, and ask her to stop? If you saw a guy at a playground putting on a very loud show in front of the kids, would you go have a conversation? Or, would you phone the police (as multiple people did in this incident)?
    2
  873. Well, this is definitely a fake news story... or well, highly modified and skewed anyway. But, I haven't got the slightest understanding of 2 x 3 = 33. What does that mean?
    2
  874. But that would defeat the purpose of making "public beach" content for her fans.
    2
  875. But, she wasn't. This is Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. Why would you believe a single thing they say?
    2
  876. What social media drove her to do what? Can you be specific?
    2
  877. Yes, especially because the suicide was a year later than the arrest, and a year BEFORE all of the big media attention. None of this went viral while she was alive, because the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. According to the articles and police reports and arrest records, etc., she abandoned her family for a life of drugs and crime about a decade ago. She served some felony time in a Florida prison around 6 years ago. A mile long arrest and judgement record for stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, more thefts, failures to appear in court, etc. And, her landlord and neighbors say that she was a stripper at the local club, and also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment. She tried to change her name a few times to evade the police, but, the courts wouldn't let her. And, she had no friends or family to speak of, because nobody even knows when the suicide took place. It wasn't until the landlord opened her apartment door to look for overdue rent that they found her, well into the maggot phase of decomposition, down to 84 pounds according to the medical examiner. Who knows how long she was decaying with absolutely nobody even wondering where she was? Yeah, it sounds like her life just caught up with her and she couldn't deal with it any longer.
    2
  878. And, when the media says "Freedom of Information Act," what do you think happens to your suit?
    1
  879. Let me guess, you fell for a bunch of sensationalist YouTube videos claiming her boyfriend murdered her, and never lifted a finger to discover the 1,000 holes in that version of the story?
    1
  880. Multiple people called the police. Read the police report. You'll find the answers to your questions. You'll also find that one of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match this version about nobody being around. And, when you keep digging, you'll find that she was a convicted felon who served a term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and has had a million other arrests before and after. And, you'll find that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  881. Sorry, society has decided that putting on this kind of show in front of children is a crime.
    1
  882. It was released on November 24, 2023 as a result of a FOIA request. They blocked the release for 2.5 years, which was well past her death. But, they cannot continue to block the release once the investigation was closed long enough. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, your claim makes no sense.
    1
  883. But, nobody saw the footage until she was already dead 1.5 years. She didn't kill herself over the arrest video. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  884. Huh? What "media" has blood on their hands?
    1
  885. First of all, huh? Haven't you ever seen "To Catch a Predator"? No blurred faces. No protected assets.
    1
  886. Secondly, handled badly? How exactly?
    1
  887. She didn't commit suicide because of people seeing the arrest video. The arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead. Good grief.
    1
  888. Wow!! It's magic!! The video was first posted on November 24, 2023. She died in March of 2022.
    1
  889. Many of her million other arrests were for drugs and alcohol. So, I cannot tell if you're being serious or not here....? And, I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club.
    1
  890. Wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" caught it on video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version of nobody being around (the story she's telling as she is trying to avoid her millionth arrest).
    1
  891. The cops didn't put it on YouTube. But, after 2.5 years, the cops could no longer block the Freedom of Information Act, since she was long dead anyway, and had to release it.
    1
  892. In what way weren't the police discreet? They took her away from the restaurant to question her outside of the view of others. They didn't have much choice but to bring her back through the restaurant to get back to their police cars. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. I'm not sure how much more discretion was even possible....?
    1
  893. So, go to a public beach instead? Huh?
    1
  894. Nobody showed the arrest video before her death. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after that.
    1
  895. What media humiliated her?
    1
  896.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  This was not serious enough to get the full misdemeanor conviction.
    1
  897.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  It never even got as far as being charged. She didn't show up at court. Sorry, but, you can keep trying to exaggerate all you want, but, it doesn't change reality. This would easily be negotiated down (if she had shown up).
    1
  898. Huh? No news even covered this until long after she died.
    1
  899. Why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so, as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? And, sorry, if anybody did this at a parade, they'd be arrested also. And, against whom is this suit of yours? The sky?
    1
  900. Huh? Seemed like a pretty normal arrest to me. What would you propose? NOT arrest her?
    1
  901. Yeah, poor guy, just wanted to enjoy himself at the playground. Kids didn't know what was going on anyway, right? Why did parents react that way to the guy cranking in front of kids? (Oh, was that a different video? Sorry, it's ok, she's female.)
    1
  902. Which media? What do you mean?
    1
  903.  @DavidKen878  No, she died TWO years ago.
    1
  904. She died 1.5 years before any big news outlet even covered this. Two obscure blogs mentioned it while she was alive. But, the real coverage never happened until she was dead for a long time.
    1
  905.  @trhansen3244  Really? Nobody should call the police? That's how this goes, in your mind? Multiple people called the police. One of the crowd even took video of the event on her cell phone, and showed it to the police. The report describes the video as a very loud, very public display, in view of multiple people, including children. I realize that the police report doesn't match the comments made by a woman trying to avoid getting arrested again. But, I wonder why you'd possibly believe her in the first place?
    1
  906.  @trhansen3244  Well, thankfully for the rest of the world, you don't know what you're talking about, and you don't get to decide these things. And, if you actually advocate public displays in front of children, you've got issues.
    1
  907. The police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. It was finally released because of a legal FOIA request, which they can no longer block after the investigation was closed for that long. She was dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video.
    1
  908. Well, 99.99% of the media coverage never happened until long after she was dead. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023, and that's when everything went viral. She died 2 years ago. The Freedom of Information Act is what's responsible for making arrest videos public property (once enough time has gone by).
    1
  909. Yeah, she put on one kind of acting show in front of the people on the beach, and then put on a different kind of acting show for the officers.
    1
  910. Mistakes? I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans. Why do you believe a word out of her? You do know she was a convicted felon with a prison term and a million other arrests, right? You do know her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash out of her apartment with parades of men, right? You find this woman credible? Not the innocent bystanders who recorded the incident, and gave a copy to the police? (Hint: it doesn't match her version about nobody being around.)
    1
  911. I don't know of any such gatherings, but, if so, they don't involve a public beach with children.
    1
  912. The Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you.
    1
  913. That's not bad advice. But, it wouldn't matter in this case. (1) One of the witnesses had it on video, and showed the video to the police. (2) With her lengthy criminal record, and open warrants, she would be arrested either way.
    1
  914. Um, ok, but, what do you mean "internet shaming" in this case? How do you "shame" a dead person?
    1
  915. But, the original arrest video wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she died. So, again, what "internet shame" came from it?
    1
  916. So, again, how do you "shame" a dead person? Good grief. It's like trying to teach calculus to an earthworm.
    1
  917. Good gods.
    1
  918. Who? And, on what basis?
    1
  919. What do you mean by "original video"? The video of the "show" on the beach was never released. Do you mean the first time Inside Edition posted a story (which was still long after she died)?
    1
  920. Because YOU know what Poseidon wants, and she didn't. Sure.
    1
  921. Ok, but, who really "shamed" her while she was alive? She died over 2 years ago. The publicity didn't happen until after the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023.
    1
  922. Well, nobody can read minds, let alone of dead people... but, personally, I'd be a lot more embarrassed by her felony prison term, and the other million arrests. I don't know why this one would stand out so much in her mind.
    1
  923. Huh? Whose hands?
    1
  924. Oh, you make a lot of sense.
    1
  925. First of all, you clearly do not understand how news producers work, and how they do their jobs. So, spare the world your hateful speculation about police officers leaking information.
    1
  926. Secondly, with the exception of a couple of obscure blogs, none of the big news outlets even covered this incident until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023 (but, she died two years ago). Freedom of Information Act. Nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  927. Third, lift a finger to find out something about her history. Good grief. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison. She had a million prior arrests. It's pretty doubtful that THIS arrest was any different than the long parade of prior ones. She didn't even show up for court. This would have probably been negotiated down to a minor infraction, and that would be the end of it, had she shown up. But, she didn't. And, if you still believe that THIS arrest was what pushed her over the edge, how do you explain why she waited almost a year?
    1
  928. Fourth, the crucifix: well, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club... makes me wonder if she wore it while "dancing."
    1
  929. And, what did you do if they were putting on a show in front of multiple people including kids?
    1
  930. Well, you're the legal expert here, but, I thought a legal FOIA request couldn't be blocked this long after someone was dead. Do explain how I've misunderstood. Can you? And, sorry, but you don't make the laws. Society has determined that indecent exposure is a crime. But, I'm sure you'd say the same thing if it was a man at a playground, right?
    1
  931. No. You didn't claim that you were taking a "moral" position. You claimed that people need to be arrested. You claimed that her permission was needed for the video to be released (which is incorrect). Is it really all that difficult to ask that you know something about a topic before accusing people of crimes?
    1
  932. Says who? You?
    1
  933. The arrest video was not released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her suicide. The arrest video had absolutely nothing to do with her death.
    1
  934. It's called the Freedom of Information Act, dewdrop. They didn't have a choice. But, yes, they successfully denied the release for 2.5 years. But, after a certain amount of time past the case being closed, they could no longer block it.
    1
  935. You agree with what I said, but, then you disagreed in the next sentence? Putting on a public show in front of children is a misdemeanor. You don't get to decide it isn't. If you want your own set of laws, go buy an island somewhere and start a new country. But, here, we go by society's laws.
    1
  936. Is that how you'd handle it if it was a man at a playground? Just mind your own business as he's cranking in front of the kids?
    1
  937. They're never going to overturn the use of police bodycams.
    1
  938. Her privacy was maintained in the sense that the police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years as an open investigation. But, yeah, that also included the fact that she was dead for 1.5 of those years, so, eventually, they had no choice but to release it because the case was closed for that long. At least she didn't suffer any shame from the bodycam video, because she was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  939. I don't understand your reference to profiling and a warrant, and neither do you.
    1
  940. She was dead whenever you saw the video also. The video wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years. This was a manufactured viral story, based on a heck of a lot of deceptive wording. They knew she was dead in the first video run, but, part of the false portrayal was to come back a few weeks later and pretend she just killed herself. In reality, she died almost 2 years ago.
    1
  941. Huh? It wasn't corruption that caused police to arrest her. It's the proper procedure.
    1
  942. Wow, and when was the last time you were tested for spelling and grammar?
    1
  943. I'd assume they do. They're probably well aware that Inside Edition is trash news that should never be trusted.
    1
  944. Well, the "whole story" would have to start more than a decade ago when she abandoned her career and family, including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, in order to live a life of drugs and crime. From there, she was arrested countless times for lots of different things, stealing cars, drug and alcohol charges, spent a felony term in prison, etc. Eventually she became an "adult dancer" according to her landlord. Then, she ended up on this beach, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest with this unbelievable sob story about nobody being around. (If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.) And, around a year later, she called it quits on life.
    1
  945. Huh? The arrest video? Or, the video taken of the incident itself by one of the "audience"? As far as I know, the latter has never been released due to content. But, the arrest video was released as a result of a FOIA request. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = no longer alive. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA.
    1
  946. Dewdrop, multiple people called this in, not just one mom. The woman was a convicted felon with a million arrests and prison time under her belt, who gave up her career and family more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of crime and drugs, who then became a "dancer" at the local club (yeah, that kind), and put on a show at a public beach in front of children.
    1
  947. Links aren't permitted, dewdrop.
    1
  948. Start by reading the arrest report. Then, look up her warrants. Then, look at her 2018 felony prison record from Florida.
    1
  949. Her "character"? Tell me, how much "character" could she possibly have, if absolutely nobody was looking for her. The coroner reported that she was in such an advanced state of decomposition that she was probably gone for a month or more before her landlord went in looking for the unpaid rent and found her. She had deteriorated to 84 pounds (in the 70s without the implants). And, absolutely nobody wondered where she was? Her husband and son didn't even go to her funeral.
    1
  950. You don't know what a summons even is. Stop pretending.
    1
  951. That's some mighty libel there. Got any ACTUAL evidence? Or, just silly YouTube videos making wild unsubstantiated claims?
    1
  952. Huh? The arrest video wasn't posted until 1.5 years after she died. Why would you believe it was a live feed?
    1
  953. Huh? Police? How did they shame her?
    1
  954. So, you can't/won't answer? I guess I shouldn't have expected an actual coherent answer from someone who doesn't know "there" from "their" and "they're."
    1
  955. Huh? What should they do instead? Not show up when multiple people call?
    1
  956. Then you cannot blame police. Blame the legislature and the entire public that put those laws in place.
    1
  957. Infraction = ticket. Crime = arrest.
    1
  958. Multiple witnesses called about this incident. They told the police it appeared to be intentional. One witness recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match this woman's story about a quiet act with nobody around. It was described as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Frankly, I'll believe the statements by innocent bystanders and the police, before I'll believe a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had a mile long arrest record. Also, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, so, it's really not that much of a stretch for me to believe she was doing it intentionally. Anyway, it sounds like she deserved to be arrested, yes.
    1
  959. Police reports, conviction history, interviews, etc.
    1
  960. Yeah, when a guy is cranking at the playground, don't worry, the kids won't understand anyway.
    1
  961. Huh? Do you even know the difference between an infraction and a crime?
    1
  962. First of all, it seems that you don't know the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. This story got almost zero coverage while she was alive. Secondly, it seems that you know nothing about this woman's history. She abandoned her career and family a decade ago, including a husband and 6 month old boy, because she wanted to live a life of crime and drugs. She served a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. She's been arrested a million times, and has had multiple convictions and judgements. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drug charges. Alcohol. Failure to appear, etc. It's not easy to get a straight job after all of that, so, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with a parade of various men. Third, multiple people called for this incident, not just the one family. Witnesses say it was an intentional act. One of them even managed to get the last few minutes on video, and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about nobody being around. It was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Now, it's up to you if you want to believe she thought she was alone. But, I'd trust innocent bystanders who were able to take video, and the police, before I'd trust this convicted felon. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but, got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  963. The arrest video wasn't seen by anybody while she was alive. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after her suicide. So, she suffered no shame over it. You're right about there being more to it than just this arrest. This was her millionth arrest, and she had already served time in prison long before this beach incident.
    1
  964. As a general rule, they blur for open investigations, and don't blur otherwise.
    1
  965. Well, your comment is too general to respond to every possible event. But, in this case, the arrest video was kept private for 2.5 years. She was dead 1.5 of those years before anybody saw the arrest video.
    1
  966. Huh? What shame? Other than a couple of obscure blog posts on websites nobody has ever heard of, how much press do you think this got while she was alive?
    1
  967. First of all, multiple people called the police, not just one. Secondly, one woman in the "audience" recorded it with her cell phone. She showed that video to the police, who then described it in their report. They said it was a very public display, very loud, and in view of multiple people including children. Sorry, but, we all know that if it was reversed, and that was a man in a playground doing the same thing in view of children, you wouldn't be saying what you're saying. So, seriously, spare the world your obvious hatred.
    1
  968. Not even close. Why would you believe that? Because that's what she's saying while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest? Multiple people called the police for this event. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. The witness stated that the woman had been walking up and down the beach to look for a place to do this, then seemingly deliberately, plopped down in view of a family. The police report said that the video shows a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. And, let's face reality here: with her mile long criminal record, as a convicted felon who served prison time, and bunches of other arrests and judgements against her, why would you possibly want to believe a word she says?
    1
  969. And, you'd believe Inside Edition, why? The arrest video wasn't seen by the public until 1.5 years after she committed suicide.
    1
  970. What did the police and family do wrong, in your mind?
    1
  971. There biznes cauced by childs in site. Prof becouse witnes had videeo and showd perleese.
    1
  972. Well, if you're relying on decency in media, your hopes will go nowhere. Legally, there is no such requirement.
    1
  973. Arrest video = July 2021 Suicide = March 2022 Arrest video made public = November 2023 Inside Edition = fake news
    1
  974. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  975. Well, that's one way to demonstrate that you didn't bother reading the arrest report.
    1
  976. Sure, if you believe a single word out of her. But, there were multiple calls, and the witnesses said it was intentional, and one of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around.
    1
  977. Do you mean a violation in actually how the law really works? Or, just in your opinion of how things should work?
    1
  978. I don't understand the grounds for your suit...?
    1
  979. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. If you're opposed to it, then go to your local congressman/woman, and request to get the laws changed. Don't blame those who follow the law correctly.
    1
  980. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  981. But, the video wasn't seen by anybody until long after she was dead. So, how is that manslaughter?
    1
  982. First of all, this arrest was on July 1, 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. So, make no mistake about it, she suffered ZERO shame from the release of the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive. If you're saying you saw it before, it was a crafted story by the media to get two rounds viral rounds out of the same incident, one to show the video without telling anybody she was already dead, and another round for the "update" that she had killed herself. Sorry, but trash news is what it is. Secondly, she was a convicted felon who served prison time for stealing cars, had an arrest record a mile long, judgements against her for other thefts/crimes, bunches of charges for drugs and alcohol, and open warrants for numerous failures to appear. Multiple people phoned the police about this incident, and one of them showed the video of the act to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version of a discreet act with nobody around. One of the witnesses said it appeared that she intentionally plopped down in front of people. Thirdly, is it that much of a leap to believe she did it intentionally? After all, it's really tough to get a straight job after being in prison, and continuing a drug and crime spree for most of a decade. So, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. Interviews with neighbors said that she did "private" cash transactions in her apartment also. Is it truly that hard to believe that she may have intended this incident?
    1
  983. Were you intentionally trying to get every sentence wrong, or was that accidental?
    1
  984. Bodycam = normal equipment now.
    1
  985. You believe she thought she was isolated, why? Because she said so, as she was attempting to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time, and didn't want to potentially end up back in prison again? The witnesses and the video they took of the incident disagree with you.
    1
  986. The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 of those years before anybody saw it. And, they have to release it eventually. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  987. So, as long as someone out there does worse, nobody can be arrested.
    1
  988. Well, I'm not really sure why you're saying they talked ill of her. They manipulated the story to make her appear like an innocent soccer mom who was embarrassed. In reality, she was an extreme drug addict with a tremendous criminal history, who did time in a Florida prison around 6 years ago, and (according her her landlord and neighbors) was a "dancer" (yes, that kind) who also did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. Compared to the reality, yeah, this video paints her as a saint.
    1
  989. And, for all practicality, sorry, but most of the stuff you're talking about doesn't result in getting put on any lists. In most states, it doesn't even qualify. And, for the states where it does (on paper), it's quite rare that it results in anything more than a fine. Had she bothered to show up in court for this case (which she rarely did for her other charges, and didn't for this one either), this would be easily negotiated down to a minor infraction.
    1
  990. Harshly? They took her away from the restaurant so that nobody could see or hear what was going on. And, they didn't harm a single hair on her head during the arrest. Leaked? Huh? No "leaks" required. Freedom of Information Act. And, you do know that nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, right?
    1
  991. Wow, what an amazing display!! Dewdrop, one of the witnesses recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. And, she never showed up in court for this arrest (which seemed to be how she handled all of her arrests, given her open warrants, and the fact that she kept trying to change her name to evade the police). And, sorry, but direct testimony from witnesses isn't hearsay.
    1
  992. Well, they blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, she was long gone by then, the investigation was long over, and they could no longer block the release.
    1
  993. Yeah. Right. Go up to her in the middle of that, and have a conversation. Sure.
    1
  994. Um, no. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released (FOIA request). She was never humiliated by the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  995. Yeah, no sense of decency at all. It's more important to produce viral videos, no matter how ridiculous or false the story is. In this case, at least they tried to paint her in a positive light. I mean, they didn't mention her felony term in prison, her million other arrests, stealing cars, drug and alcohol charges galore, failures to appear, judgements for other thefts, etc. Instead, they call her a real estate agent, despite that she hadn't sold a house in over a decade. They show a few seconds of the landlord and neighbor interviews, but, they left out the ones where they said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) at the local club, and "entertained" parades of paying men in her apartment.
    1
  996. How?
    1
  997. Is that what you'd do if it was a guy cranking it at a playground? Go up and warn him before you call the police?
    1
  998.  @PanhandleFrank  I thought he meant to warn before calling the police. But, yeah, that's the problem when someone doesn't spell it out. Yes, he doesn't understand an infraction vs. a crime.
    1
  999. And, you believe she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so, while trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest?
    1
  1000. Huh? The arrest video wasn't seen by anybody until 1.5 years after she was already dead. She wasn't even slightly humiliated from its release, because she wasn't alive when anybody saw it.
    1
  1001. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1002. Well, 99.99% of the media coverage never even happened until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She was long dead by then. So, nobody really "ruined" her (other than herself). As for your suit, well, I don't think you can win on the basis of Inside Edition running a story. They're slimy as all getout, sure, because this story is massively inaccurate, but, it's just barely true enough for them to be able to say that they didn't outright lie. I don't think you have a suit, frankly.
    1
  1003. Well, women don't typically steal cars either, yet, this woman in this video went to prison for exactly that. Women also don't tend to abandon 6 month old sons, yet, she did exactly that also. I don't think this was a typical woman.
    1
  1004. The police BLOCKED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, they cannot block it forever, and eventually had to release it due to FOIA. What more do you expect?
    1
  1005. Dewdrop, the police didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by the time it was released.
    1
  1006. Well, it's not quite 100% open to be broadcasted. Like, in this case, the police held the arrest video private for 2.5 years. She was already dead 1.5 of those years by the time they released it. They had kept it private because it was an open investigation. But, 1.5 years after she died, they can no longer block its release.
    1
  1007. What do you propose instead?
    1
  1008. A) The witness version doesn't match this little innocent version she's portraying while she's attempting to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time. This is especially true because one of the "audience" captured this incident on video. B) The arrest video wasn't released to the public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. Learn something about the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1009. Again, she suffered ZERO shame from the release of the arrest video, because she was dead before anybody ever saw it. Secondly, why do you think this arrest had anything to do with her suicide? Because Inside Edition said so? It's trash news. Why would you believe a word of it? If she was so shameful about being arrested, you'd think she'd have committed suicide long before, because she had an arrest and prison history a mile long. She did prison time for felony car theft. She had numerous arrests and judgements for various thefts, alcohol and drug problems, failures to appear in court, etc. And, let's face reality here: after all of that, it's pretty difficult to get a straight job. So, according to her landlord, her profession was, well, one of those words that's banned from YouTube comments, ya know, it involves cash transactions with lots of men. Her own family doesn't believe this arrest had anything to do with her suicide. Why do you? (Oh, wait, because Inside Edition said so.)
    1
  1010. But, the Freedom of Information Act doesn't make those kinds of specifications. Once a case is closed long enough, and there's a legal FOIA request, the cops don't have much of a choice. But, you're talking about embarrassment? Um, you do know she was dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video, right? You cannot embarrass someone who is dead already.
    1
  1011. Well, sure, writing that message is one way to demonstrate that you didn't read the arrest report. She was reported by multiple people. One of them recorded the incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her version about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat. Why'd you believe a single word out of her anyway?
    1
  1012. So, the video taken by one of the "audience" and showed to the police wasn't proof?
    1
  1013. Were you intentionally trying to get every single sentence incorrect? Or, was that by accident? 1) She wasn't humiliated by posting the arrest video online, because nobody ever saw it until 2.5 years later. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released as a result of a legal FOIA request = November 24, 2023.
    1
  1014. 2) The police handled the arrest correctly.
    1
  1015. 3) Multiple people called the police. One even got the incident on video, and showed it to the police.
    1
  1016. 4) The police were called because the actual version of this story doesn't match what she is trying to say while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest. The witnesses said it seemed that she was intentionally doing this in front of people. And, the video (I haven't seen, but is described in the police report) showed a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  1017. 5) Making a long story short, she abandoned her family and her real estate career around a decade ago to lead a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of crime and drugs. She ended up serving a felony prison term for stealing cars. Her arrest record is a mile long for multiple crimes, including drug and alcohol charges. She had multiple judgements against her for various other thefts. Her methods of dealing with it all seemed to be to simply not show up at court, and to keep trying to change her name to evade the police. With that history, it's tough to get a real job. So, according to her landlord, she was a stripper who worked at the local club. Apparently, she decided to put on one of her shows at the beach this day, rather than at the club. Don't believe me? Start by looking up her arrest record, and the interviews with her family and landlord, and then come back and tell me if you think this was some suburban soccer mom who thought she was alone on the beach.
    1
  1018. Yes, that type of "exposure" in front of children is an aggravated misdemeanor. And, yes, they explained it.
    1
  1019. You clearly do not understand the difference between an infraction and an actual crime.
    1
  1020. Is that really how this goes for you? Just pretend you understand the law better than the police and courts?
    1
  1021. Lots of people say what you're saying. But, I have yet to see anybody offer a coherent suggestion about what exactly the cops should have done differently.
    1
  1022. All arrests = cuffs. And, you don't know the difference between a crime and an infraction.
    1
  1023. Who went out of their way to embarrass her? "They" (the cops) didn't release the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died. And, even then, it was probably the result of a Freedom of Information Act request (mandating them to release it).
    1
  1024. Yeah, that's probably not bad advice. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the people who called about this incident recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. Plus, with her long criminal record and open warrants, she was getting arrested either way.
    1
  1025. Yeah, I hear you. You know you're getting old when 36 seems like a young girl.
    1
  1026. You never saw any video of her while she was alive. July 1, 2021 = arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  1027. Huh? She walked out on her family (including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son) and career more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She did a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She had a million other arrests. Stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failure to appear, other thefts, etc. What "job"? Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. Neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. And, sorry, but the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and nobody saw it while she was alive, so, what "shame" did she really suffer from it?
    1
  1028. You win the most ironic nickname of the week award. "Factsmatter" while knowing absolutely nothing about the facts.
    1
  1029. Why? Would you prefer the "innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" version that Inside Edition (where facts don't matter) is putting forth? Truth hurts?
    1
  1030. Dewdrop, she never registered for anything, because she never showed up to court for this arrest, and she kept evading police and even tried to change her name to keep evading police. She hasn't had a job in real estate in more than a decade. And, her husband offered to take her back after prison, but she didn't, and wanted to keep living her life of crime and drugs. Is there any point that you'll stop pretending you know things you don't?
    1
  1031. Yes, of course it was on video. Multiple people called the cops, and one woman recorded it. And, the cops saw that video, and described it in their police report as a very loud and very public display in full view of multiple people, including children. Tell me, though. If it was a man at a playground doing the same thing, would you still recommend just leaving him alone? Just "turn around kids, we'll go to a different playground." That's it? Leave the guy to keep on doing it?
    1
  1032. Congratulations on knowing absolutely nothing, yet again.
    1
  1033. The arrest video wasn't released until after she was already dead 1.5 years. She had her day in court. She won. She wasn't convicted. And, she suffered ZERO shame from the arrest video.
    1
  1034. And, you still won't answer my original question. You know, maybe it's time that you stop pretending you know things you don't.
    1
  1035. Multiple people reported this incident. I'm sure they're well aware never to trust a single thing on Inside Edition.
    1
  1036. Multiple people reported it. One person recorded it. I fail to understand your point.
    1
  1037. Is what what my taking from this? Engrish not you languages?
    1
  1038. No, dewdrop. There were at least TWO separate people who called. Read the police report. Why do you want to defend this ridiculous convicted felon so much anyway?
    1
  1039. Freedom of Information Act. To boost ad revenue to Inside Edition and others like them.
    1
  1040. The video wasn't shown to the public until long after she died. Nobody bullied her over the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive. And, when it was released (2.5 years after the arrest), it was the result of a FOIA request (no choice). As for accountability, how about holding her accountable for her own actions? No?
    1
  1041. Oh, come on, get real. Go up and talk to her while she's cranking it in front of people?
    1
  1042. Huh? Who made money off of her that bullied her?
    1
  1043. So, in your mind, it was a "leak"? Not a simple FOIA request? And, huh? The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1044. It's one of the things they do during all arrests.
    1
  1045. Um, no. Not even close. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. You cannot humiliate someone who is already dead. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, almost zero news outlets even mentioned her name until long after she was dead. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1046. Shouldn't have been arrested? Huh? With her million other arrests, and felony prison term spent in Florida, and open warrants? Um, yeah, sorry, but she's getting arrested for an aggravated misdemeanor like this.
    1
  1047. When did they start giving warnings or fines for aggravated misdemeanors? You're the legal expert here, not me, so, can you explain?
    1
  1048. They don't give warnings for aggravated misdemeanors. And, sorry, but she WAS one of the hardened criminals you're referring to. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failures to appear. A felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. A million other arrests. Open warrants. What more do you want here? You didn't fall for the "innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police" story, did you? Sorry, but, "convicted felon who can't stop getting arrested, gets arrested yet again, and commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral.
    1
  1049. Well, they probably know better than to trust a single word out of Inside Edition (where facts don't matter).
    1
  1050. A) Get real. Nobody is going up to someone in the middle of cranking in public to have a conversation. Would you go up to some guy in a playground? B) We employ police to deal with crimes. That's why we have them.
    1
  1051. OK, on what basis? The FOIA requests must be honored. How do you propose preventing that? And, how do you find whoever published it? Their channel is gone now.
    1
  1052. Proof? Like the video taken by one of the "audience"? Like the statements given by the different callers? Like the fact that she admitted it (well, partially anyway)?
    1
  1053. I agree. But, at least the poor woman was long dead before the press covered the story. Her only "shame" for this incident came after she was dead.
    1
  1054. I realize the scale is massively different than the example in the video... but, for me, I'd be pretty embarrassed to have the literacy level of a 2nd grader. Yet, apparently, there's no shortage of people (i.e. you) willing to advertise it to the world.
    1
  1055. Huh? So, your contention is that they shouldn't arrest someone for committing a crime? What in the world? And, why these police? Why not any of the other police for her million other arrests?
    1
  1056. What original video, and when?
    1
  1057. Um, not even close. The big publicity didn't even happen until she was already dead for 1.5 years. That's when the arrest video was made public... 2.5 years later, which was also 1.5 years after she died. Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry, but if she didn't experience shame from putting on a public display at a beach, it's pretty doubtful she'd be shamed about a video that wasn't released until after she was dead. Body-cameras took the video, by the way.
    1
  1058.  @mrs.dontmindme6542  Wrong. Her family doesn't think her boyfriend/client did anything. They think it was suicide, as do the cops and medical examiner.
    1
  1059. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests. With that history, it's difficult to get a straight job, and her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. One of the audience recorded this incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a discreet act with nobody around. It was a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'd eat my hat.
    1
  1060. Can you name any media that covered this story while she was still alive?
    1
  1061. Huh? Which news media?
    1
  1062. No. This was 2.5 years ago. She's been dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1063. Almost zero media covered this story until long after she was dead. There were a couple of obscure blog posts about the arrest, but, 99.99% of the social media attention didn't happen until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023 (she died two years ago). So, no, it didn't cause her suicide. And, let me get this straight... she just got finished putting on a public display in front of multiple people, including children, and you think her bathing suit in a restaurant was embarrassing to her? Putting on the public show wasn't embarrassing? But, a bathing suit in a restaurant was? Dewdrop, do you even know what she did for a living? No, not Inside Edition's reference to her career from a decade ago in real estate. That was long gone when she walked out on her career and family a decade ago in favor of her life of drugs and crime. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she did "private" cash encounters with numerous men in her apartment. Yet, you think she was embarrassed by wearing a bathing suit? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison in Florida about 6 years ago, and had an arrest record a mile long for various other stuff. I'm pretty sure she was used to cuffs by then. And, sorry, but the restaurant was the path back to the police cars, not much of a choice there. But, you keep on your crusade, ok? Just keep pretending you know things you don't.
    1
  1064. Oh, and by the way, multiple people called the police. One of them even managed to record it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about being a quiet act with nobody around. They said it was intentional, and in view of multiple people including children. But, hey, you keep on believing nonsense spewed by convicted felons, ok? I'll stick with innocent bystanders and police.
    1
  1065. You can get a citation for an infraction. For a crime, you get arrested. Learn the difference. Secondly, she didn't suffer any shame from the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive. Third, she left her family behind around a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. They moved on without her long ago.
    1
  1066. Except, one of the audience took video, and showed it to the police. It didn't match her version about nobody being around. Plus with her mile long arrest record, prison history, and open warrants, yeah, she was getting arrested, make no mistake about it.
    1
  1067. Handled by who with more discretion? The police managed to keep this arrest video from being public for 2.5 years. It was probably a legal FOIA request that made it public, which was still 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1068. Was there some sort of point here?
    1
  1069. It's pretty ridiculous... people blame the cops. They had no choice but to arrest her. The video of the incident doesn't match what this woman is claiming while she's trying not to get arrested. The report says that the video showed a loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. And, if it was public enough that people took video, that means it hardly was a private little secluded thing with nobody around. There was plenty of cause to make the arrest. Then, people blame the cops for releasing the video. But, what choice did they have, if it was a result of a legal FOIA request? Once a case is over long enough, they can't block FOIA requests any longer. The dates Inside Edition will never say: Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. But, hey, they have viral videos to produce, right?
    1
  1070. Doubtful that this particular arrest really mattered that much anyway. With all of her prior arrests, her time in prison for stealing cars, all of the legal judgements against her for various thefts, the warrants for her arrest for many failures to appear in court, and the long history of drug and alcohol related offenses, this one extra incident probably didn't matter all that much.
    1
  1071. So, the woman said she thought she was alone, in an attempt to avoid her millionth arrest and potentially going back to prison again, and you believe her?
    1
  1072. What? Shoplifters get arrested daily.
    1
  1073. Huh? None of the video views cost her life. Nobody saw the arrest video until a couple of months ago. She's been dead for 2+ years.
    1
  1074. Well, Smoking Gun published that obscure article, yes. But, "all who had a hand in publishing the recordings of the arrest"? What does that mean? What did they have to do with her death? Nobody saw the arrest video until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  1075. Huh? What don't you understand here? The video was never seen by anybody in the public until 2.5 years later. That's 1.5 years after she died. The police kept it private until they could no longer do so. The Freedom of Information Act can only be blocked if there's an ongoing investigation. But, 2.5 years later, which is 1.5 years after she's dead, the police can no longer block it.
    1
  1076. Wrong. Nobody saw the video until November 2023.
    1
  1077. Hey, what a fine detective you would make. Um, errr... wait... the arrest video WAS kept private until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died. Manslaughter? You can't kill someone again who has already been dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1078. Secondly, with her long criminal history, time served in prison, arrest record a mile long, etc., she probably felt like she had better try to cry her way out of it before they realized who she was. Had she been silent, they'd surely look her up.
    1
  1079. First, one of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version of a quiet act with nobody around.
    1
  1080. Well, one of the witnesses recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Between that, and her prior arrests and open warrants, there wasn't any chance of avoiding being arrested. And, if she had shown up for this incident's court date, then maybe, yes, this could easily be negotiated down to an infraction, a little counseling, and it would be over. But, she didn't show up. To answer your other question, Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1081. Who exactly "shammed" her? You cannot even spell it. What do you think you know about it?
    1
  1082. Well, maybe. But, what does that have to do with this video? "Media" didn't get involved until she was long dead.
    1
  1083. Because nobody in the public ever saw the arrest video until 2.5 years later. She was long dead already.
    1
  1084. Why do you not understand? Nobody saw this arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  1085. You're clearly the legal expert here, not me. So, can you explain when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors like this? And, other than a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, no media even touched this story until long after she was dead.
    1
  1086. No, it's actually backward from that. They'll often show incriminating videos against the police early. But, for stuff that incriminates someone in the public, they usually won't release it until well after the case is closed. In this case, she was dead 1.5 years before the arrest video was released.
    1
  1087. Just wondering, would you say the same if it was a man at a playground?
    1
  1088. Multiple people reported her, not just the one family. And, yeah, sorry, but when someone decides to put on a public show like this, it shouldn't be shocking that people would report it. If it was a guy cranking at a playground, would you be making this comment?
    1
  1089. Wow!!! And, you know all of that by watching Inside Edition's trash news? Dewdrop, multiple people called the police for this incident. One witness said that the woman went up and down the beach and it appeared that she intentionally chose to plop down in view of others. Someone else got the incident on video, and showed it to the police. The arrest report describes it as a very loud, and very public act, in view of multiple people including children. I'm sorry if that differs from the story as given by the convicted felon who began her drug and crime spree about a decade ago, went to prison, and came out and continued her drug and crime spree exactly where she left off. But, I tend to believe police and innocent bystanders more than I trust the word of felons who were trying to avoid their millionth arrest by saying, "I didn't do it." I cannot claim to know why she chose to put on this show, but, she was certainly used to it, because according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. I guess that makes sense, given that it's probably very difficult to get a straight job after her mile long felony and arrest record. For all I know, maybe she was on something at the time, and forgot she was at a beach and not the club where she worked. But, no blame goes to the people who called the police. Blame goes on the criminal. And, by the way, her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public. I'm sorry if Inside Edition doesn't spell it out, but, ya know, "soccer mom gets busted" is far more viral than, "convicted felon commits another crime."
    1
  1090. Thanks for demonstrating that you didn't read my reply.
    1
  1091. Um, no. The arrest video wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. You didn't see it before she died.
    1
  1092.  @kevinerbs2778  No, dewdrop. The Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you. Stop making up stuff about topics you don't understand.
    1
  1093. Congratulations. You're the 1 millionth person claiming they could have handled it better, but refusing to say how.
    1
  1094. Well, that's what happens as a result of an aggravated misdemeanor. And, as for "help," well, maybe if she had bothered to show up in court, they could have negotiated this down to a minor infraction and provided that help. But, as usual (for her) she didn't show. And, no, it didn't lead to her suicide a year later.
    1
  1095. Yes. But, at least the poor woman didn't have to suffer any consequences from the "news" (not news).
    1
  1096. Huh? Multiple people called. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around. To the contrary, it was an intentional act, probably for her to promote herself by recording "public beach" content.
    1
  1097. And, you do know she was a convicted felon who spent time in prison. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Etc. And, you do know that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. You know all of this, right? How does that bode for the credibility of the woman in the video? Why would you trust her, instead of the police and innocent bystanders. How is it "harassment" to arrest someone for the millionth time for committing a crime?
    1
  1098. Spare the world your drama. Anybody who cries "George Floyd" every time an arrest happens is extremely weak and has nothing to offer. By that logic, police should never make an arrest. THIS arrest was 100% valid.
    1
  1099. I doubt this arrest was any different than all of the rest of her arrests. If her mile long history of drugs and alcohol, various arrests, her prison term for stealing cars, her multiple judgements against her for theft, her numerous failures to appear in court, etc., didn't bother her, then I don't know why one more arrest would matter all that much to her.
    1
  1100. Yeah, leave those guys alone when they're doing the same thing at the playground. It's none of your business.
    1
  1101. Yeah, leave guys alone when they're at the playground doing the same thing that she was doing.
    1
  1102. Huh? Which video? The video of the incident itself has never been released due to graphic content. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she died. And, it was released due to the Freedom of Information Act. I fail to understand your suit...????
    1
  1103. What exactly do you think they did that was overkill?
    1
  1104. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1105. No harm either.
    1
  1106. Well, at least nobody knew about it until long after she was dead.
    1
  1107. Bingo. Especially because Inside Edition decided to make two rounds. They knew darned well that she's been dead for years. But, they decided to release one round of videos, while not mentioning she's already dead. Then, in the 2nd round, they post the "update" that she's dead, and let people believe the 1st round caused it.
    1
  1108. Huh? Which video? The video of the actual incident has never been released. And, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1109. Doubtful. It received nearly zero coverage until the arrest video was released (which was long after she was dead). And, the couple of articles that did cover it while she was alive were hardly considered "blast."
    1
  1110. This is a well understood reaction from people incapable of ever admitting being wrong.
    1
  1111. Why do NONE of you blind followers of Inside Edition ever check the facts? Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022 (unknown date). Body found = March 31, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. There cannot be blood on anybody's hands because of an arrest video that nobody saw until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1112. She was embarrassed for what, exactly?
    1
  1113. What shame would that be? A couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of? And, if "shame" was an issue for her, maybe she chose the wrong career path, eh? (Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club.) And, maybe she shouldn't have plopped down at a public beach and put on a show for bystanders (including children), huh?
    1
  1114. Well, it wouldn't have mattered anyway, because one of the witnesses recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her sob story about "nobody was around." And, yeah, with her extensive criminal record, felony time spent in a Florida prison, and million other arrests, you'd think she'd know by then not to talk. But, my best guess is that she figured that being silent would be a 100% guarantee that they'd look her up and find all of the open warrants, but, by trying to cry her way out of it, there'd be a 50/50 chance that they'd let her go before looking her up.
    1
  1115. So, you're just going to double down on pretending to know things you don't?
    1
  1116. Doubtful. They made millions in ad revenue from making this viral.
    1
  1117. Huh? It was a suicide.
    1
  1118. Freedom of Information Act. How can the police stop it?
    1
  1119. Yes, a public beach. And, sorry, your analogy is just incorrect. And, she should have been pretty used to being arrested by that point in her life.
    1
  1120. Can you please explain when police started giving reprimands for misdemeanor crimes? I thought they only had that level of discretion for an infraction, not a crime. But, you're clearly the legal expert here, so, I defer to you....
    1
  1121. Except, she was dead for 1.5 years before any of this was ever on YouTube. I mean, you don't trust Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  1122. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  1123. Did she know the Clinton's what?
    1
  1124. Really? She put on a show in front of multiple people including children. And, you're worried that she was "shamed"? Who shamed her, and how?
    1
  1125. Yes, I agree. I just wouldn't know how to stop it, what with the Freedom of Information Act. But, at least the one saving grace is that the woman was long dead when the video was released. She wasn't alive to suffer any shame from it.
    1
  1126. No. That channel was deleted. I doubt we'll know who it was. But, what is he/she accountable for, exactly?
    1
  1127. They must release it as a result of a legal FOIA request. But, not for open investigations. In this case, however, the case had been closed for a long time. The video was from 2.5 years ago, and she was already dead for 1.5 of those years, so, they cannot continue to deny FOIA requests, and had to release it. But, the "good" thing is that, at least nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  1128. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1129. Well, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. According to her neighbors, she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. One of the witnesses recorded her on the beach and showed the video to the police. It didn't match her version about a quiet discreet act with nobody around (the story she was telling as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and probably was worried that she might end up back in prison again). So, what you propose might be quite possible/probable.
    1
  1130. How? What do you mean?
    1
  1131. Huh? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, how could it have caused her suicide? It wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then.
    1
  1132. A) Multiple people called the police, not just one family.
    1
  1133. B) Your claim that each person has done this is laughably wrong. One of the "audience" recorded this incident, and showed the video to the police. It is described in their police report as a very loud an public act, in view of multiple people, including children. Sorry, but, I don't know anybody who has put on this kind of display in front of an audience at a beach.
    1
  1134. D) You wanted to be her friend? Let's see... mile long legal history, felony prison term for stealing cars, numerous drug and alcohol charges, multiple judgements against her for various thefts, drug and alcohol charges galore, numerous failures to appear in court, with open arrest warrants, attempts to change her name to evade the police, left her family behind, including a husband and a 6 month old son, to live a "wild" and "off the rails" life (her family's words, not mine), etc. And, let's face reality here, it's not easy to get a straight job as a convicted felon with all of those arrests still pending. So, according to her landlord, her "career" was, well, ya know, one of those words that you can't use in YouTube comments... involves cash transactions with lots of men... ya know.
    1
  1135. E) You believed the woman? Why? She was trying to get out of her millionth arrest. So, you're going to take her word for it, about this quiet little discreet act, instead of taking the words of the police and witnesses?
    1
  1136. Good grief. It's blocking some of my postings.
    1
  1137. Yet, you cannot name a single thing they should have done differently. Typical.
    1
  1138. I confess that I don't quite follow what you're attempting to say. Too many don'ts and dos and I just got lost in the double negatives. But, to answer the general spirit of it, this arrest video wasn't released until long after she was dead. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1139. The media is to blame for what? And, you have your facts wrong. One of the witnesses said that she had been walking up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, then plopped right down near a family with children. So, no, the family didn't "just keep on walking" because they weren't walking. The woman was. And, if you're claiming that the multiple people who called the police shouldn't have done that, well, tell me, if it was a man at a playground putting on a show in front of children, would you say the same? Just mind their own business, don't call the police?
    1
  1140. Translation: I don't know anything about this, and I just got done saying that people should mind their own business, but, I'm going to point blame and stick to my position.
    1
  1141. The video was not released to the public until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1142. Good grief. You cannot even formulate a coherent sentence. Why would you believe your opinions matter?
    1
  1143. And, you're just realizing this now?
    1
  1144. Huh? You're under the impression that she was innocent?
    1
  1145. Dewdrop, the police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, after the investigation was closed for that long, they could no longer block the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1146. Stop blindly believing deceptive videos made by Inside Edition. Good grief. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1147. Multiple people called. One of them recorded it and gave the video to the police.
    1
  1148. No "leak" is required. The Freedom of Information Act makes the video public property. But, you don't even understand the timeline in the first place. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    1
  1149. Huh? What exploitation was that? Nobody saw the arrest video until after she was dead. None of this went viral until a couple of months ago.
    1
  1150. Yes. It was all over the internet months ago. She died two years ago. Good grief. Pay attention.
    1
  1151. Well, that was your mistake for calling it a "news outlet." This is tabloid journalism at best, certainly not news, and never has been.
    1
  1152. "Of been" isn't a verb. And, with the exception of one obscure blog post on a site I've never heard of, nobody put any of this online until the arrest video was released (which was 1.5 years after she was already dead). She destroyed her own life long before this incident.
    1
  1153. No, you do not understand what happened here. This story NEVER made the news while she was alive. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA. The news wanted two viral rounds for the price of one. So, they posted the story in late November and early December, omitting the fact that she was already dead. That way, they could post the "update" a few weeks later that she had died, and pretend that the first round caused the second round, producing two viral videos about the same story. The reality is that this arrest had nothing to do with her death, at least not in any large part. It was just another arrest in her pile of a million arrests.
    1
  1154. Why? Did you know her?
    1
  1155. No. The arrest video didn't get released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1156. Yes, it was ruined long before this arrest.
    1
  1157. When did they start issuing fines for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  1158. I think there's plenty of compassion, probably too much. But, that's irrelevant to the concept of accountability.
    1
  1159. First of all, of course she was going to be arrested. Why do you think otherwise? Secondly, you have a serious timeline problem with what you're saying. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, no, her suicide didn't come after people saw the arrest video, it came before.
    1
  1160. Huh? The police didn't post it. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police blocked the release of the video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  1161. But, almost no media covered this story until long after she was dead. So, um, no.
    1
  1162. So, putting on a show in front of multiple people including children is "didn't do anything in public"?? Huh?
    1
  1163. Here's the issue: you chose to blindly believe (a) some woman in a minute long video, rather than the police and innocent bystanders, and (b) Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). Time to raise the bar a bit, huh?
    1
  1164. Yes, I agree. But, at least she wasn't alive to know anything about this being posted on the internet.
    1
  1165. Agreed 100%. The only silver lining is that it didn't get plastered on the internet until 1.5 years after she died. At least the poor woman wasn't embarrassed by the release of this arrest video, since it wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then.
    1
  1166. OK, but, the police prevented the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. And, she was dead for 1.5 years by the time it was released. Once a case is closed that long, they cannot block a legal FOIA request any longer.
    1
  1167. You don't think that the multiple witnesses, one of whom recorded it and gave the video to the police, had anything to do with it also?
    1
  1168. Who did the police hurt, and how?
    1
  1169. And, you believe she was alone, why? Because that's what she said while trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? What about the multiple callers who said otherwise? What about the one who recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police? It doesn't match her version about nobody being around. What reason do you have to trust a single thing she says? She was a convicted felon with a prison term under her belt, and countless arrests and convictions. You find her trustworthy?
    1
  1170. But, the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. This incident was from July 1, 2021. Her suicide was March of 2022.
    1
  1171. Huh? Who even knew about it?
    1
  1172. Well, I agree, the arrest video shouldn't have been made public. But, I just don't know how to stop such things, what with the Freedom of Information Act. But, sorry, I also don't know why you advocate such a suit, because the arrest video wasn't made public until she was already dead 1.5 years. And, it's not defamation, nor anything close to defamation. As for not cooperating with the police, yeah, but, it's doubtful that it would have mattered. Multiple people called the police. One in the "audience" even video recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. I fully realize that this doesn't match the woman's version. But, I tend to trust things witnessed by multiple people and caught on video... more than I trust the words of a woman trying to avoid getting arrested. I think she was going to get arrested whether she said anything to the police or not.
    1
  1173. Who "throughout the nation" even knew about this incident while she was alive?
    1
  1174. We seem to have a timeline problem, and Inside Edition sure isn't going to tell you the timeline (ruins their fake story): July 1 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. That's when it went viral and was covered by the news. Before then, a couple of obscure blogs mentioned the arrest (no video though), but, nothing of real consequence.
    1
  1175. Again, what news station do you believe even covered this story when she was alive? Why do you believe what you believe?
    1
  1176. Apparently, I need to spell this out for you. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. That's when the news covered it.
    1
  1177. The arrest video was kept private for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it until long after she was dead.
    1
  1178. Georgia doesn't have such a registry. But, it was certainly illegal for her to possess as a convicted felon.
    1
  1179. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1180. Multiple people called the police. Why should they feel ashamed for it?
    1
  1181.  @porytlim8508  Again, dewdrop, nobody saw the arrest video until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1182. Why? Were you going to sue her?
    1
  1183. Yeah. Another "handled badly" comment from someone who won't say how to handle it instead. And, yeah, with her long criminal history, you'd assume she would know to remain silent. But, my guess is that she was hoping to cry her way out of it before they looked up her open warrants. Remaining silent = 100% odds that they'll look her up. Cry her way out of it = 50/50 chance of getting out of there before they knew who she was.
    1
  1184. Who did?
    1
  1185. Agreed, but, just verifying here, you do know that the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead, right?
    1
  1186. No, she walked up and down the beach looking for somewhere to put on a show, plopped down in front of multiple people (including children), and did exactly that. I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans.
    1
  1187. Dewdrop, multiple people called. And, sorry, but you don't get to make the laws. Society does. And, society has decided that putting on a show in front of children is illegal.
    1
  1188. The cops DID handle it as privately as possible. They took her away from the restaurant for questioning. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years (which was 1.5 years after she was dead). What more do you want? And, by the way, with her felony prison term, and the fact that this was her millionth arrest, I hardly think that one more arrest was really going to matter that much.
    1
  1189. What original video? The one taken by the witness on the beach? As far as I know, it was never posted anywhere.
    1
  1190. Yet, you won't say exactly what "trouble" they should be in, nor why?
    1
  1191. So, on your planet, the Freedom of Information Act doesn't exist?
    1
  1192. The video was released under a legal FOIA request on November 24, 2023. What's your complaint?
    1
  1193. Your reply was that they shouldn't have arrested her? (Yet, either YouTube deleted that reply, or you did, because it's not visible any longer.) Yes, arresting her was correct. Multiple people called the police. One witness recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version of a discreet act with nobody around (the story she told as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again). Not only that, but, with her mile long arrest record, and failures to appear in court, there were open warrants, so, she was getting arrested no matter what.
    1
  1194. You clearly haven't watched the arrest video. They quietly took her away from the restaurant, outside the view or earshot of others, to question her, and tell her why they were there. Yet, you're saying they didn't? Go watch the entire arrest video before you pretend to know things you don't. The police were quite polite and professional. You don't believe the arrest video should be released? Well, dewdrop, that's not up to you. I already told you in a prior posting that it was released from a FOIA request. You declared that the police should be in big trouble. So, how does your personal opinion about what should or shouldn't be released result in cops getting in trouble? The law says that the video belongs to the public, and mandates that police release it once enough time has passed after the investigation was closed. It is a felony for the police to violate the Freedom of Information Act and refuse to release the video. Yet, you want them in "big trouble" for following the law correctly?
    1
  1195. And, now you want a suit over this for wrongful death? Dewdrop, how about a suit for libel against you instead? This arrest was July 1, 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2002. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. So, how can the arrest video be responsible for her death, when she had already been dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw it?
    1
  1196. Look in the mirror. You'll find everything wrong with the world looking right back at you. You pretend to understand things you don't. You refuse to understand things, even after being told. And, you have a clear hatred for police bleeding through every word you type. And, not that it matters for anything that's been said here, but, just as a side note, I'm sure you're unaware that, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. According to her neighbors, she also did "private" encounters in her apartment for cash with numerous men. And, yeah, with her long arrest history, time served in prison, judgements against her for various crimes/thefts, drug and alcohol charges, etc., it's pretty difficult to get a straight job after that, so, what the neighbors and landlord say make sense, and what the witnesses at the beach said also makes sense. Nothing you say makes sense.
    1
  1197. OK, proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law, what exactly did the police have no legal right to do?
    1
  1198. Hilarious!!! She had a criminal record a mile long. She did a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She had been arrested a million time before and after. Frankly, my guess is that she was trying to talk her way out of it because she had open warrants, and hoped that she could whine her way free before they looked her up. Oh, and by the way, the audience took video of the incident, and gave it to the police. So, yes, there's plenty of proof. And, it didn't match her version about nobody being around.
    1
  1199. Um, ok, what will you do when you find them?
    1
  1200. Except virtually no organizations, including Inside Edition, ever published anything about this story until long after she was dead. She experienced nearly zero shame from this.
    1
  1201. Well, maybe she should have thought of that before putting on a show in front of multiple people including children. And, if she was so vulnerable to shame, why does her landlord say she was a stripper at the local club? That's a strange career choice for someone who feels so much "humiliation," huh?
    1
  1202. Well, maybe if she bothered to show up in court, she could have gotten the rehabilitation you're talking about. But, she didn't.
    1
  1203. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public (Freedom of Information Act). Inside Edition never published ANYTHING while she was alive. So, no, it didn't drive her to do anything.
    1
  1204. So, you blame the police for wearing their mandatory body cameras? And, you blame them for obeying the Freedom of Information Act? Wow. Um, just a tip here: your hatred is showing.
    1
  1205. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1206. Well, video is part of most arrests nowadays. And, the video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. And, what is your plan for this suit of yours when [whoever] says "Freedom of Information Act"?
    1
  1207. You do know she was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, and her landlord said she was a stripper, right? Afraid of exposure?
    1
  1208. I understand about the news station. But, I have no idea why you'd make that comment about the police. What would you have done differently?
    1
  1209. The restaurant was the pathway between the beach and the front where the police cars were. And, sorry, but with her mile long arrest record, I'd think she'd be used to it by then.
    1
  1210. That's probably good advice. But, the police had the video taken by the audience.
    1
  1211. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, there's no mechanism for your suit. But, FYI, it wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1212. The video was released 2.5 years later. That's 1.5 years AFTER she died. Stop trusting Inside Edition.
    1
  1213. How the wonder family reports to I?
    1
  1214. Freedom of Information Act. Yes. But, they didn't release it until 2.5 years later. She was already dead a long time before the arrest video was released.
    1
  1215. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1216. Well, the release of the arrest video was probably because of a legal FOIA request. But, at least the police managed to keep the arrest video out of the public for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. So, the poor woman didn't suffer any public embarrassment from the arrest video. And, sleep peacefully? What's your allegation here? The police shouldn't abide by the legal Freedom of Information Act requests? Frankly, I think you don't have the foggiest clue.
    1
  1217. Freedom of Information Act doesn't determine anything about "public interest."
    1
  1218. My guess is that she was making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  1219. First of all, she suffered nearly zero bullying or shame over this, because almost no media outlets covered this until the arrest video was released a couple of months ago. Secondly, multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version.
    1
  1220. You don't really expect me to reply to your snide comment, do you?
    1
  1221. "Snide" isn't a noun, dewdrop... at least not in the context I used.
    1
  1222. Huh? The police managed to keep this arrest video out of the public for 2.5 years. But, eventually, they can't block legal Freedom of Information Act requests if the case is closed for too long. And, given that she was already dead for 1.5 years by the time the arrest video was made public, I fail to understand your point. Who exactly needs training? And, what training would you give them exactly?
    1
  1223. Of they really? Of warnings of for aggravated of misdemeanors of? Of you understand of difference between of infraction and of misdemeanor? Of police of do not of have that level of discretion of for crimes as of infraction of.
    1
  1224. Of you of aware of audience recording of the incident of? Of it doesn't of match of her sob story of nobody of being around her of. Of it showed of a loud of event in front of multiple of people including children of of. Why of you believe of her? Because of she said of so as she of was of trying to avoid her of millionth arrest of?
    1
  1225. So, a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long says she thought she was alone, and you just blindly believe her? Why? How about the witnesses who say otherwise? How about the video they took of the incident, showing that she was in view of multiple people including children?
    1
  1226. What you're missing is that this was a crafted media story, no more, no less. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA. The media wanted two viral rounds for the price of one, so, they released the story in late November and early December without mentioning that she was already dead. Then, they released the story again with the "update" that she died, and created misleading videos to pretend that the cause was the media attention.
    1
  1227. What shame do you think she really suffered from this? And, why do you blame the police?
    1
  1228. Well, congratulations. Every sentence you wrote was wrong. Let's start by correcting your lack of understanding about the police video. The police kept it private for 2.5 years. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. That long after the investigation was closed, they could no longer block a legal FOIA request. Yes, she had been a realtor in the past. But, she gave up that life about a decade ago, when she decided to ditch her career and her husband and two boys (two different fathers) to lead a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of crime and drugs. She served some time in prison for stealing cars. She had multiple judgements against her for various other thefts. And, she had an arrest record a mile long for various drug and alcohol charges. It's rather difficult to get a straight job after all of that. So, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Interviews with neighbors also state that she did "one-on-one" cash transactions also, ya know, can't be stated in YouTube comments, right? Anyway, she didn't show up for court (seems like her normal way of dealing with all of her arrests, because she had a long string of open warrants for failure to appear). But, nearly zero media covered this story while she was alive. So, again, what shame do you think she really suffered from this? And, why do you blame the police?
    1
  1229. Legal history a mile long. Served a prison term for stealing cars. Multiple judgements against her for various thefts. Serious drug and alcohol issues, and additional arrests for it. Abandoned her family, including a 6 month old baby, so she could go "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words). Numerous failures to appear in court (including from this incident), with open arrests. Attempts to change her name to evade the police. According to her landlord, her "profession" was, well, ya know, one of those things some women do when they can't get a real job, but YouTube blocks the words from being posted. Yes, totally delightful.
    1
  1230.  @soloshotfirst1118  Love your nickname. (Yes, honestly.)
    1
  1231. Um... I don't understand. She was a convicted felon who served prison time for stealing cars, and had an arrest record a mile long from the last decade of her drug and crime spree. She had multiple judgements against her for various thefts. She had numerous failures to appear resulting in open warrants (including for this very arrest in this video). So, I really don't quite understand this notion of innocent targets and freed guilty people??
    1
  1232. The original video? You mean the video of the woman taken by the witness at the beach? As far as I know, that video hasn't been seen by anybody outside of the witnesses and the police. Or, did you mean a different video?
    1
  1233. First of all, "their" is a real word. You should learn to use it. Secondly, what exactly do you think the police did wrong?
    1
  1234. Yet, you still can't name what you think they did wrong.
    1
  1235. But, she never suffered from the arrest. She wasn't convicted and did no time for it. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death.
    1
  1236. Who was harsh? And, well, I certainly can't speak for her, but, I'd assume her felony prison term for stealing cars was the dark time in her life.
    1
  1237. Well, yes, sort of. I mean, she had an arrest record a mile long, served prison time for stealing cars, lots of drug and alcohol problems, multiple failures to appear in court, judgements against her for various thefts, tried to change her name so the police couldn't find her, and then this arrest in the video. But, you say it like it's a bad thing?
    1
  1238. But, dewdrop, the cops prevented the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died. And, how is it "defamation" in the first place? You're clearly the attorney here, not me, so, can you enlighten me on this amazing legal knowledge you have?
    1
  1239.  @EmilyTienne  What cruelty? What do you mean?
    1
  1240.  @EmilyTienne  Dewdrop, the arrest video was kept private by the police until she was already dead 1.5 years. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Your hatred shows every time you post a message.
    1
  1241. Well, I don't think she should have committed suicide. But, I fail to understand why you're saying that what happened to her was wrong. (?)
    1
  1242. Oh, well, with the number of drug charges she's had, yeah, most likely she was the main consumers on that beach.
    1
  1243. How do you "bully" a dead person?
    1
  1244. Huh? Blame the victim, not the criminal?
    1
  1245. Or, you could stop believing nonsense like Inside Edition, and look the dates up for yourself. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. The police didn't "cause" anything to her. She was a troubled woman with an arrest record and a drug problem. Sorry if you believe silly stories like this one.
    1
  1246. Well, she quit real estate about a decade ago when she left her family and career behind to go on a drug and crime spree. She even continued the drug and crime spree after she got out of prison.
    1
  1247. Dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she died. Secondly, she was a convicted felon who served time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and couldn't stop getting herself arrested both before and after. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. Thirdly, one of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match this story about nobody being around. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1248. Blame everyone except the criminal, right?
    1
  1249.  @danighere4180  Yeah, I'd say this arrest, plus her other million arrests, and her felony term served in a Florida prison, makes her a criminal.
    1
  1250. Then explain her extensive arrest record, the felony prison term she served in Florida about 6 years ago, her multiple judgements/convictions, and her open warrants.
    1
  1251. You didn't really fall for an Inside Edition story, did you? Facts don't matter to them, only ad revenue matters. They get more views from the "innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police" version than the "convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested gets arrested again" version.
    1
  1252. Um, so, you want to repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  1253. I don't know what you mean. It was a Freedom of Information Act request. What does the badge cam have to do with being accountable for anything?
    1
  1254. Well, given that her neighbors say she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) and did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment, she was most likely making a video for her fans, and showing her face probably helped her.
    1
  1255. Some additional facts that Inside Edition has no desire to tell: Arrest history and prison time for stealing cars and public drunkenness. Long history of additional theft, legal judgments against her, and failure to appear in court, attempts to change her name to evade being served/arrested. Was once a real estate agent, but, no real sales in quite some time. Living on welfare. Failure to pay rent. Suspected actual income from, ya know. This arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. This arrest video made public = November 2023. She suffered zero shame from the arrest video, because nobody saw it until she was dead for 1.5 years. Her own family doesn't report that the suicide was the result of this arrest, but, rather a history of drugs and alcohol. Does this paint a different picture than the Inside Edition story that asks questions, but never gives answers?
    1
  1256. Oh, and, one of the members of the "audience" recorded the incident with her cell phone, and showed it to the police. It's described in the police report as a very loud display in front of multiple people including children. And, the audience reported that it appeared that she was walking around, looking for a spot to do this, and it seemed that she chose specifically a spot that was visible. Inside Edition doesn't tell you any of that either. And, she had long since abandoned her own family and kids, years before this beach incident. This is why she was missing for so long with nobody even knowing she was already dead. Many of her own family, including her husband and one of her sons, did not attend her funeral. Her own family said that she had gone "wild" and "off the rails" years before, and lived a life of drugs and alcohol.
    1
  1257. I agree. But, just checking here, you do know that almost nobody covered this story until after the arrest video was released (November 24, 2023). She was already dead for more than 1.5 years by that point.
    1
  1258. You're clearly the legal expert here, not me. So, can you explain when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors like this? And, can you explain why police should ignore the bunch of open warrants from her million prior arrests?
    1
  1259.  @ozzieone67  Then why aren't you crusading to get the Freedom of Information Act repealed?
    1
  1260.  @ozzieone67  Search again. Look at the actual meta data and the fact that the bodycams were "updates" to the articles.
    1
  1261. It's even more sad that you'd trust a single thing on Inside Edition.
    1
  1262. Yeah, what's wrong? Can't a guy just go to the playground and crank in front of the kids when he wants to? Crazy country arrests people for putting on a show for the kids.
    1
  1263. This is YOUR thread, dewdrop. If you don't like replies, don't post anything.
    1
  1264. Dewdrop, I'm not the one defending someone who put on a show in front of kids. You don't have the high ground here.
    1
  1265. Is that where you learned to do these things in front of kids? I've never been to church.
    1
  1266. Well, maybe. But, let's face reality here for a minute. The woman weighed 86 pounds at the time of her death, and was on welfare, and couldn't make her rent payments. This was the path she was on. I certainly cannot say that I knew her (I didn't), but, I also know not to just blindly trust media stories designed to generate ad revenue. It sounds like her life may have been going downhill for a while. I mean, how do her two teenage kids go 12 days and not even know she was dead, unless they were already estranged to some degree (another sign of her life taking a bad turn)? I'm definitely with you on the notion that her arrest video shouldn't have gone public. But, personally, I can't attribute her suicide to one incident like that.
    1
  1267. Well, then let's clear up one thing: she suffered nearly zero humiliation from this. One obscure blog post mentioned this arrest on a site I had never even heard of. But, no major media covered it until the arrest video was released, which was 2.5 years later, and she was long dead. And, if none of her prior million arrests, nor her felony term in prison, ever fazed her, it's doubtful this one more little arrest would have mattered all that much.
    1
  1268. She suffered nearly zero humiliation, because there was nearly zero coverage of this story until long after she was dead. A couple of obscure blog posts commented on this arrest (no video, just comments), and that was all, until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. That's when it went viral.
    1
  1269. Why would you believe she thought nobody could see her? Because she said so, as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Here's a clue: criminals often try to say "I didn't do it" or worm their way out of being arrested. This shouldn't be surprising.
    1
  1270. It's amazing to me about what people will believe from a 1 minute video from Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). Oh, what a wonderful sweetheart she is. She didn't mean to do it. Those evil police arrested her for nothing. Meanwhile, the reality is that she was a convicted felon who walked out on her family and friends more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs, ended up doing a prison term in Florida, got arrested countless times before and after for various crimes, and, according to her landlord, was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. One of the audience at that beach recorded this incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police, and it didn't match this version about nobody being around. But, what a sweetie who was so humiliated!! Inside Edition says so.
    1
  1271. Naw, even though she had a mile long arrest record, this particular incident would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction with no real consequences. And, I'd hardly think this charge was a "heavy weight" on her, when compared to her felony prison term about 6 years ago.
    1
  1272. You don't know anything. The cops didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later, which was also 1.5 years after she was dead. And, how do you suppose they can block a legal Freedom of Information Act request after the case was closed for that long? They can only block them for open investigations.
    1
  1273. The footage wasn't "leaked." It's called the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1274. The video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1275. Yeah, don't blame the criminal. Blame the innocent people. And, hey, I wonder, if it was a man at a playground, would you just bring your kids to a different playground? Or, would you call the police?
    1
  1276. You clearly don't feel guilty for your misplaced hatred of the police. Why should they feel guilty for properly doing their jobs?
    1
  1277. Huh? Who should be, besides herself?
    1
  1278. The news and police did WHAT?
    1
  1279. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. Who exactly is 100% to blame? Who's "they"?
    1
  1280. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  1281. So, you can't muster the ability to answer a simple question?
    1
  1282. So, you're PROUD of not being the brightest bulb.
    1
  1283. Of been of yes, there of was of video. One of the of audience of took video of the of event and of showed it to of the police. Of read the of police of report to of find out.
    1
  1284.  @Enigma-gu6iw  No. YouTube's algorithm and Inside Edition's filters blocked me.
    1
  1285. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. So, um, no.
    1
  1286. The video taken by the "audience" was never released. The arrest video was released 2.5 years later, long after she was already dead.
    1
  1287. Yeah. When you see a guy cranking at a playground with kids, just leave him alone.
    1
  1288. Well, multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match the "nobody was around" sob story she's telling as she's attempting to get out of her millionth arrest. Why do you believe her anyway? A convicted felon who served time in a Florida prison, with a criminal record a mile long, says nobody was around. The witnesses say she plopped down in front of multiple people (including children) and put on a show. And, you'll go right ahead and believe the criminal over the innocent bystanders who recorded it?
    1
  1289. Oh, and this was an aggravated misdemeanor, yet, you think she shouldn't be arrested for it?
    1
  1290. Well, social media didn't get involved with this incident until 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, sorry, but she ruined her own life.
    1
  1291. Just checking here: you do know that this wasn't all over the internet until long after she was gone, right? July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = no longer alive. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Only then did it go viral.
    1
  1292. Your tone seemed to indicate that you bought into this silly fake story crafted by Inside Edition, so, I was merely making sure you knew about when/how it happened. As for this video being their last memory, well, at least this story tries to paint her in a positive light. In reality, she was a convicted felon who did prison time and had a million arrests, and had abandoned her family (husband, 6 month old son, another son) more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. And, according to neighbors, was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) and did "private extras" in her apartment with a parade of paying men. I'd think you'd be happy that this Inside Edition story is how she's remembered, rather than the truth.
    1
  1293. What mainstream media even published this story while she was alive?
    1
  1294. But, nobody saw this footage until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1295. Huh? Other than a few people on a couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of, who even knew about this until long after she was dead? And, sorry, but her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. If she has trouble being embarrassed by exposure, she picked the wrong career.
    1
  1296. Viral videos make money. But, what do you mean by "continues"? Almost all of these channels that covered this incident only did so after she was already dead. She suffered nearly zero shame for this incident while alive.
    1
  1297. If it was an infraction, police have the discretion to give just a warning. But, this was a crime, not an infraction. And, what reason do you think this one arrest was the reason she committed suicide? None of her other million arrests caused her suicide? Just this one?
    1
  1298. Well, I agree. But, at least she wasn't harmed by social media while she was alive.
    1
  1299. What you've witnessed is nothing more than a carefully crafted story to garner two viral rounds instead of one. She has been dead for two years. The arrest video was only released, however, on November 24, 2023. In order to get two viral rounds, the "news" (not news) stations created the story in late November and early December, but didn't mention that she was already dead for a long time. Then, after a few weeks, they re-released the story and gave the "update" that she killed herself, and let the viewers falsely believe it was because of the first round of videos.
    1
  1300. Huh? What's a "guilty coincidence"? And, how would you have handled it better? And, "innocent"? Huh? She ADMITTED IT!!! And, one of the audience recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. What more do you want here? She was a convicted felon with a criminal record a mile long, and a term spent in a Florida prison, and you're here saying she was "innocent"? Why? Because you believe Inside Edition (where facts don't matter)?
    1
  1301. Did you even watch the arrest video? They politely took her away from the restaurant in order to grant some privacy so people couldn't see and hear what was being said. The only "exposure" she had was when they had to take her back through the restaurant because it was the pathway to get her to the police cars. Then, the police kept the arrest video private until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw it. What would you suggest they do differently?
    1
  1302. One of the audience took video and gave a copy to one of the three cops dispatched to the scene. There were multiple callers also.
    1
  1303. How'd they manage that miracle of physics? Inside Edition never reported anything until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1304. Smoking Gun didn't have the video. They just reported the arrest on a blog. The video was released 2.5 years later via a FOIA request.
    1
  1305. Well, that's the picture Inside Edition paints. But, reality is quite different.
    1
  1306. Yeah, when you see a guy at a playground cranking it in front of children, just mond (your spelling) our own business, and let him do his thing.
    1
  1307. That video has never been released due to graphic content. The Freedom of Information Act required the release of this video, but, the video of the "incident" itself is still protected due to the content.
    1
  1308. How do you humiliate someone who is already dead?
    1
  1309. Well, with her long criminal record, felony term spent in a Florida prison, million other arrests, I'd hardly call this a "first time offense." And, sorry, but recording is normal now. The arrest video was not released until 2.5 years later, though, which was long after she was already dead. And, sure, they could have treated it as a mental health issue, had she shown up in court (which she didn't).
    1
  1310. Huh? What "troll" even knew about this before she was dead?
    1
  1311. Freedom of Information Act. After this much time has passed, and long after she's dead, yes, the police can no longer block the release of the video.
    1
  1312. A) Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose they do? B) At least nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1313. Sorry to rain on your parade. But, you clearly have the timeline all wrong. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022 (exact date not known). Body discovered = March 31, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. Went viral = December, 2023.
    1
  1314. Oh, and it wouldn't have mattered if she admitted anything or not. One of the "audience" took video of the incident, and showed it to the police.
    1
  1315. Of course there was proof. One of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. And, sorry, but the police did their jobs correctly. She's to blame for her own actions. Stop blaming others.
    1
  1316. Um, ok. And, when she was busted for stealing cars, should she say that same thing? "I wasn't hurting anybody." Does that work?
    1
  1317. Have you read the arrest report?
    1
  1318. Yup. But, she's had a million other convictions prior to this arrest. So.....
    1
  1319. Yeah, but, that's why they open the video by asking the question "was she shamed?" (then never answer it). That way, they can twist the story however they want, and if anybody goes after them for painting an inaccurate picture, they can say, "we were only asking questions, we take no responsibility for the accuracy of the answers, because we never provided any answers."
    1
  1320. Didn't you understand the tone of the video? Innocent soccer mom was arrested by evil police, and she killed herself over it. Accountability isn't even mentioned in the story, so, we're supposed to blame evil police. All hail Inside Edition!! (where facts don't matter)
    1
  1321. There were a couple of obscure blog posts while she was alive. But, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later (1.5 years after her suicide). That's when everything went viral. So, there was virtually zero public shaming.
    1
  1322. Yeah, deceptive journalism. The arrest was in July of 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. The arrest video was released in November of 2023. So, they publish the arrest video, then, a few weeks later, publish that she committed suicide, pretending like the release of the arrest video was the cause. In reality, she was already dead for 1.5 years before the video was ever made public. They know this. They just don't care. It gets more viral if they pump up the notion that the arrest video was the cause of the suicide, rather than being honest from the start and say that the arrest had nothing to do with the suicide.
    1
  1323. Indecent exposure in front of minors is an aggravated misdemeanor.
    1
  1324. Yes, but, Google is your friend. And, you can also read her mile long arrest record for various crimes, police reports, and her felony conviction and term served in prison for stealing cars, etc. You can also learn that the timeline was: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. And, you can read interviews with her landlord stating that she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions out of her apartment with numerous men. Her own family says it was drugs and alcohol that were her main problems, which you can confirm by reading her arrest record for drugs and alcohol (in addition to the other crimes). Yes, it's pretty unlikely that this particular arrest would have much of an effect on her suicide almost a year later. It seems like a drop in the bucket.
    1
  1325. Can you even name any "legacy media" that posted anything whatsoever about this story while she was alive? (Hint: no, you can't, because it got virtually zero press until 2.5 years later, and she was long gone by then.)
    1
  1326. Thanks, I was only aware of a couple of obscure blogs. Yes, there were a few more articles. But, I reject the notion that those caused her ultimate decision a year later. I'd say that her own family knows better, and they said that this particular arrest had nothing to do with it. They said it was her long history with drugs and alcohol, and her choice to abandon any semblance of normalcy, and to live a life of crime instead, which led to her final choices. After all, she didn't make that choice after spending her felony term in prison, nor any of her other million arrests. And, let's face reality here. Her neighbors said her "career" was as a "dancer" who did "private extras" for parades of paying men. She was probably making "public beach" content for her fans. The little bit of press she got would only help her career, not hurt it.
    1
  1327. Bingo.
    1
  1328. Good grief. Learn the facts. Nobody saw this video until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1329. And, you believe that because Inside Edition said so. Bravo!
    1
  1330. Um, no. Not even close. Multiple people called the police. And, the most important one was a woman who took video of the incident, and showed the video to the police. The report describes the video as a very loud, very public event, in full view of a crowd of people including children. I'm sorry if you blindly believed a woman who was trying to avoid getting arrested again. But, that's really your own issue. The police had no choice but to make the arrest, given the circumstances.
    1
  1331. Great job. You don't know the definitions of the words you use, yet, you scream at the wind anyway.
    1
  1332. Why do you believe her when she claims she thought nobody was around? Do you always just take the criminal's word for it?
    1
  1333. What does the LAPD have to do with anything that happens in Tybee Island, Georgia? And, dewdrop, the video was released as a result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. But, it didn't cause her death, because it was not released until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw the video.
    1
  1334. Her suicide had nothing to do with this incident.
    1
  1335. Yeah, the coroner reported that she was down to 82 pounds, which included the implants. So, that's in the 70s without the silicone.
    1
  1336. Ok, but how do you stop it from getting out? The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she was dead. I doubt she was humiliated by the couple of obscure blogs that mentioned her arrest.
    1
  1337. If someone does a FOIA request, how can the police prevent the footage from getting released?
    1
  1338. Huh? What media ended her life? This arrest video was never put into any media until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1339. First of all, why would you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so to the police when she was attempting to get out of her millionth arrest? And, sorry, but, she ruined her own life about a decade ago. You don't get to blame the police for doing their jobs correctly. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long for other things, including drug and alcohol charges, and numerous failures to appear in court. This one little arrest was just a drop in the bucket.
    1
  1340. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. So, no, this didn't lead to her suicide.
    1
  1341. Huh? The police? They got multiple calls for this incident. They dispatched 3 officers to handle it. One of the "audience" recorded the incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. They questioned her, and she admitted to the main act (though, it's pretty clear that she was trying to downplay what was going on). They performed the arrest. They then prevented the arrest video from being released for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive, thanks to the police blocking its release. But, 2.5 years later, with her long gone, they could no longer block the FOIA requests. I fail to understand your issue here?
    1
  1342. OK, and what happens to your suit when they point out that they didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later, and that she was long dead by then, and it was the result of a Freedom of Information Act request when they did? Then what? Do you think your suit has any grounds?
    1
  1343. Huh? How did the government shame her?
    1
  1344. But, they didn't shame her, dewdrop.
    1
  1345. Of course they arrested her. Why wouldn't they? Multiple people called to complain. One in the audience even took video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it wasn't this quiet little act with nobody around that the woman is pretending. It was a loud public display in view of multiple people including children. Plus with her long arrest record, the term she spent in prison before, and open warrants, yeah, she was getting arrested. As for releasing the arrest video, yes, it's called the Freedom of Information Act, dewdrop. It would be a felony for them NOT to release it. But, the police did successfully block the release until 2.5 years later. She was already long dead before anybody saw the arrest video. But, eventually, once the investigation is closed long enough, they have no choice. Oh, but you keep on pretending to know things you don't.
    1
  1346. Multiple people called about this incident. One in the audience even took video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it wasn't this quiet little act with nobody around that the woman is pretending. It was a loud public display in view of multiple people including children. Plus with her mile long arrest record, the term she spent in prison before, and open warrants, yes, of course, they arrested her. As for releasing the arrest video, yes, it's called the Freedom of Information Act, dewdrop. But, the police did successfully block the release until 2.5 years later. She was already long dead before anybody saw the arrest video. But, eventually, once the investigation is closed long enough, they have no choice.
    1
  1347. Multiple people called about this incident. One in the audience even took video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it wasn't this quiet little act with nobody around that the woman is pretending. It was a loud public display in view of multiple people including children. Plus, she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, had an arrest and judgement record a mile long, and open warrants. There was no real choice but to arrest her.
    1
  1348. As for releasing the arrest video, yes, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. But, the police blocked the release until 2.5 years later. She was already long dead before anybody saw it. After the investigation was closed that long, they had no choice but to release it.
    1
  1349. They didn't release the arrest video until long after she was dead, dewdrop. And, it was the result of a Freedom of Information Act request. What else would you propose they should do?
    1
  1350. Huh? They arrested her because it was warranted to do so. But, she wasn't convicted, so, she suffered no consequences from the arrest. How did this arrest ruin her life? The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death. So, I have no idea what you mean.
    1
  1351. But, as I said (and you ignored), the arrest had nothing to do with the suicide.
    1
  1352. Dewdrop, you just can't help yourself, eh? You keep posting pure nonsense.
    1
  1353. Great job trusting the words of a drug addict attempting to avoid being arrested.
    1
  1354. Yeah. Interesting how the arrest video came out 2.5 years after the incident. And, nobody mentioned that she was dead. Then, the story that she was dead came out a couple of weeks later. In reality, she was dead for 1.5 years already by the time the arrest video was made public. Funny how "news" (not news) stories like this will manage to skew the facts in order to force the public to jump to false conclusions, all so their videos go viral. Incident = July of 2021. Suicide = March of 2022. Arrest video was made public = November of 2023. Yet, the "news" story is trying to paint the picture that the release of the arrest video had anything to do with her death?? Why? Why would you believe what you believe? Because a video told you?
    1
  1355. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and had a million other arrests before and after. She has zero credibility.
    1
  1356. The police PREVENTED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. What more do you want from them?
    1
  1357. Do you know what a crime is, vs. infraction?
    1
  1358. First of all, multiple people called the police for this incident. One person took video, which the cops said did not match this woman's description of a quiet little discreet act where nobody was around, but, was a very loud and public act in view of many people including children. Secondly, I wonder, would you feel the same if it was a man at a playground. "Oh, don't worry kids, we'll just leave and go to a different playground. Let the man do his thing." Is that how it would go, in your mind?
    1
  1359. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it and gave the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match this version about "nobody was around." The witnesses said that she wandered up and down the beach, and plopped right down in front of people to do this.
    1
  1360. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison about 6 years ago. She had a million arrests, both before and after. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. Etc.
    1
  1361. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment. And, her family said she walked out on her husband and 6 month old son (and another son) a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  1362. I find nothing she says credible at all. I tend to believe innocent bystanders and police before the words of a convicted felon. You apparently believe the opposite.
    1
  1363. I find it far more probable that she was making "public beach" content than blindly believing her sob story as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  1364. I'm pretty sure that was the point. "Public beach" video content is very popular.
    1
  1365. My still taking it out of context? What does that mean? Was that your 2nd grader's vocabulary level of trying to say, "you're"? What difference does it make if it's a beach or playground? Either one was a display in front of children. So, answer the question. Would you say the same if it was a man at a playground?
    1
  1366. Nice try about text-to-speech. Even that's not correct, because it would be speech-to-text. And, I don't buy a single word of it.
    1
  1367. Nobody bullied or humiliated her into suicide. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. She suffered no shame from the arrest video because nobody saw it until she was dead for a long time. And, sorry, but you know darned well that you'd say differently about a man at a playground.
    1
  1368. Did you read the police report? Multiple people called the police. One woman in the "audience" even recorded the event on her cell phone, and showed that video to the police. They describe it in their report as a very loud and very public act in front of multiple people, including children. One of the witnesses told the police that she had been pacing up and down the beach, then decided to plop right down in front of a family including children, and perform. I'm sorry this doesn't match the words spoken by a woman with a mile long record of arrests and prison time for stealing cars, public drunkenness, other kinds of theft, changing her name to evade police arrests/serving notices, and all kinds of other judgements against her. But, yeah, I think I'll stick with the innocent public who didn't do all of those things, and even got this event on video.
    1
  1369. Oh, because the convicted felon who spent time in prison, and had a million prior arrests, says that she didn't think anybody was around. Let's believe every word. Or, hmmm, maybe the witnesses who recorded it on video might have a point, eh? People WERE around, including children.
    1
  1370. Well, it's really difficult for convicted felons to leave the country, at least legally. So, I doubt she was going anywhere. I don't know the details, but, she might not have even been allowed to leave the state.
    1
  1371. Because a crime was happening, so, yes, one of the "audience" captured it on video to show the police. Why is this difficult to understand?
    1
  1372. Well, maybe of she should of thought of that of before of putting of on a show of in front of the public (including of children) of at the beach of of. That's of an aggravated misdemeanor of.
    1
  1373. And this mess was your edited version? How bad was the first version you wrote?
    1
  1374. Well, they probably know better than you do about trusting anything you see on Inside Edition.
    1
  1375. Huh? The video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. You don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  1376. But, no media aired this arrest until 1.5 years after she died. So, um, no.
    1
  1377. What channels on YouTube covered this while she was alive?
    1
  1378. Well, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. I highly doubt she'd lose her job over being exposed in public.
    1
  1379. The first part of your sentence is correct (according to her landlord and neighbors). But, the second part is wrong, it was a suicide.
    1
  1380. But, there was nearly zero media exposure until long after she was dead.
    1
  1381. Huh? Who do you think humiliated her? And, how?
    1
  1382. The police blocked the release of the arrest video until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. How is her death on them?
    1
  1383. That's some impressive libel. Got any evidence?
    1
  1384. People aren't not going to help when not down, especially not when they couldn't not talk.
    1
  1385. Well, then you'll be relieved to know that the police had nothing to do with it. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video released = November 2023. It was probably the result of a legal FOIA request. And, since the case was long over, and she was already dead, the police had no choice but to release the video. So, whew, I guess this means you'll be dropping those murder charges, right?
    1
  1386. Infraction vs. crime.
    1
  1387. How does the media "bully" someone who isn't even alive?
    1
  1388. There must be 1000 commenters saying those exact words. Funny that almost none of you ever say what they should have done differently.
    1
  1389. And, the media was supposed to provide that help?
    1
  1390. Freedom of Information Act. How do you prevent its release? And, they didn't release it until long after she was already dead. So, I don't know what you're talking about, and neither do you.
    1
  1391. Huh? The Freedom of Information Act says the exact opposite.
    1
  1392. Well, you could start by reading the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1393. Sorry that you blindly believe everything you see. Arrest = July of 2021. Suicide = March of 2022. Arrest video made public = November of 2023. I'm sorry you blindly eat up any garbage Inside Edition feeds you. But, yeah, the reality is that the release of her arrest video had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  1394. A) That's not how aggravated misdemeanors work.
    1
  1395. B) What about her extensive criminal record and open warrants? No? Just let her report on her own?
    1
  1396. The arrest video was released due to FOIA 2.5 years later, after she was long dead. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1397. No. A real journalist would first get the dates straight. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = arrest video made public.
    1
  1398. Really? Which media would that be?
    1
  1399. Huh? Sue the media, well, I'm no legal expert, but, I'm not 100% sure what the basis would be. But, sue the police? Huh? What do you think the police did?
    1
  1400. Nosy? The woman plopped down on a public beach and put on a loud and X rated show in front of a family with children. Good grief. Or, did you actually believe her when she said she didn't think anybody was around?
    1
  1401. Yeah. Sure. Next time you hear about some guy dropping his pants and going to town at a playground, be sure to tell all of the parents to just look the other way, and never call the police.
    1
  1402. Do you have any understanding of this case, beyond what the drug addict was claiming as an attempt to avoid getting arrested?
    1
  1403. Freedom of Information Act. Good luck with that suit.
    1
  1404. What? The police? What did they have to do with your complaint?
    1
  1405. And, you believe that, why? Because you watched a one minute story on Inside Edition (where facts don't matter)?
    1
  1406. Who do you think humiliated her? And, how can she get counseling without showing up for court?
    1
  1407. The path back to the police cars was through the restaurant. But, c'mon, with her mile long record of her prison sentence and million arrests, I'd hardly think another arrest would ruin her. Seems like she did a fine job of ruining her own life long before this one more arrest.
    1
  1408. Huh? The laws DO protect people in this situation, and did so here. The Freedom of Information Act allows/mandates the release of the video, but, not during an open investigation. This video was not released until long after the case was closed. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = video made public.
    1
  1409. Nice try to backtrack.
    1
  1410. Hilarious!! You do know that one of the "audience" took video of the incident, and showed it to the police, right? You read the arrest report, and know that the video shows her in the act, in front of multiple people including children, right? I guess it was all fake CGI, manufactured in the 5 minutes between when all of the people called the police, and when they arrived, huh?
    1
  1411. But, firstly, no YouTube channels ever posted anything about this until long after she was dead. And, what does the family do when the "news" channels simply say "Freedom of Information Act"? How would you win the suit?
    1
  1412. They're probably well aware that this is Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), and that this incident had nothing to do with her suicide a year later.
    1
  1413. The cops took her away from the restaurant to question her, so that nobody could see/hear what was going on. They then blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody ever saw this video. What EXACTLY do you believe the cops did to contribute to anything?
    1
  1414. They didn't release the video until 2.5 years later. That's 1.5 years after she was already dead. She suffered no shame from the release of the video, because nobody saw it until long after she was dead. And, the answer to your question is the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1415. Sure, and, it could have been reported with a lot less respect. Like, they could have brought up her long legal history, her prison term for stealing cars, her judgements against her for various thefts, her arrests for alcohol and drugs, her many failures to appear in court and open arrest warrants, the fact that she left her family behind to go live a wild life, including a 6 month old boy, and maybe even mention her "profession" as her landlord described it (which can't be posted in a YouTube comment, but, ya know, it involves cash transactions with men). I'd say, in the bigger scheme of things, yeah, they could have been a lot more disrespectful than this.
    1
  1416. Dewdrop, Inside Edition never touched this story while she was alive. They never aired a story on it until November, 2023. She died TWO YEARS AGO.
    1
  1417. Naw, they probably know darned well that Inside Edition's version of this story is heavily modified, nowhere near accurate.
    1
  1418. OK, on what basis?
    1
  1419. A) Freedom of Information Act. B) July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Bravo on pretending to know stuff you don't.
    1
  1420. The landlord did.
    1
  1421. But, the public didn't see the arrest video until she was already dead for 1.5 years
    1
  1422. Huh? What embarrassment or shame did she suffer from this posting of this video? She's DEAD!!! I mean, don't get me wrong. I don't think they should have posted the video either. But, I also know that you cannot shame or embarrass someone who is dead.
    1
  1423. Multiple people called the police for this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match the version she's telling about a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. That, plus the fact that she was a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long, and had open warrants, um, yeah, I think they were going to arrest her no matter what. Plus, do you know the difference between an infraction and a crime? There is no "warning" for this offense. But, you keep on pretending you know things you don't, ok? It's great entertainment for the sane people in the world.
    1
  1424. Freedom of Information Act. You need to go to school.
    1
  1425. No "leaks" required. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1426. And, you would believe she was alone, why? Because the convicted felon said so as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  1427. But, technology wasn't the reason for her destruction. According to the family, drugs and mental health were the reason. And, sorry, but the bodycam footage wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. That's one fact that Inside Edition will never tell you, because it doesn't help their viral videos. They'd rather ask questions, but not provide the answers, and make viral videos out of misinformation.
    1
  1428. Indecent exposure in front of kids is an aggravated misdemeanor.
    1
  1429. Before her death, who said any such thing?
    1
  1430. So, no arrests can ever be made until... Donald Trump something?
    1
  1431. Well, then you'll be happy to learn that this video was never made public until 1.5 years after her death (which was 2.5 years after the arrest). Of course, Inside Edition will never tell you that, because they're more interested in ad revenue from viral videos that paint the wrong picture.
    1
  1432. Yeah, I agree, and wish videos like this would never be released. But, 1.5 years after her death, I don't think they could block its release any longer. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1433. Multiple people called to complain about this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and gave the video to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around (the story she was giving while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest). The only thing that "singled her out" was the show she decided to put on at the public beach. She was a felon who served time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and had an arrest and judgement record a mile long. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Other thefts. Failure to appear in court. You name it. And, with her lengthy criminal history, it's difficult to get a straight job, so her landlord and neighbors said she was a stripper at the local club. So, sorry, but, I think I'll stick with the words from innocent bystanders and the police.
    1
  1434. Well, the saving grace is that she didn't suffer from any of the media platform humiliation. She died about 1.5 years before the arrest video was made public.
    1
  1435. Held accountable for what? Doing their jobs correctly?
    1
  1436. You have your order of events wrong. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Publicized to millions = November 24, 2023 through today. She took her own life long before anything was publicized to millions.
    1
  1437. The general rule is to blur for open investigations, and don't blur for closed ones. Since she's been dead more than 2 years, I think it's safe to say the investigation is closed.
    1
  1438. Yeah, not much of a choice, though. Witnesses had it on video. And, if she had stayed silent, then there would have been no way to avoid them looking her up. With her mile long criminal history, I'm sure she'd have known not to talk to police by then, but, staying silent guarantees they'd find her open warrants.
    1
  1439. It is blocking my posts if I try to give the names of the people who called, but, it's all in the arrest report.
    1
  1440. Multiple people called the police. One of them even took video of the incident. The report also describes the video, which doesn't match the story told by the stripper in this video (who was also a convicted felon who served prison time for stealing cars, and had an arrest record a mile long for various other crimes, judgements against her for other thefts, numerous drug and alcohol charges, and open warrants for her arrest). She claims it was a quiet and discreet act with nobody around (as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest). But, the witnesses stated to the police that she wandered up and down the beach, and specifically chose a spot in view of people. I'm not sure why you would choose to trust the criminal instead of the police and the innocent bystanders. And, I'm not sure why she did it in the first place. But, after her criminal history, yeah, it's difficult to get a straight job. So, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said that she also did "private" encounters for cash out of her apartment with lots of men. So, frankly, I don't think she had any shame at that point. And, she certainly wasn't all that humiliated either. She had plenty of experience getting arrested. And, except for a couple of blog posts on obscure sites I've never heard of, no media even covered this story until the arrest video was released 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw it to "humiliate" her. Sorry, did Inside Edition fail to give the facts? Sorry.
    1
  1441. The only accountable person is herself. Don't blame others for her own actions in life.
    1
  1442. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1443. There's still an open investigation. But, for the woman in this video, the investigation was long closed. Freedom of Information Act. Learn it.
    1
  1444. Well, with the exception of a couple of obscure blogs, it WAS kept quiet until long after she was dead. But, my guess is that she was on that beach recording for her "career," and public attention was what she was seeking. (You do know she was a convicted felon with a million arrests, and her landlord and neighbors say she was a stripper at the local club, right?)
    1
  1445. Yes, and I'm just scratching the surface.
    1
  1446. Well, there's no assumption of privacy on a public beach. But, I'm confused. I didn't know that the video taken by one of the witnesses was ever made public.
    1
  1447. Huh? Which media do you think humiliated her to death? One cryptic obscure website that I've never heard of? Other than that, the viral media frenzy never happened until the arrest video was released, which was long after she was dead.
    1
  1448. But, you just accused others of a crime. I'm asking you who you think committed that crime, and what the crime was?
    1
  1449. Yeah, when the man at the playground cranks in front of kids, just mind your own business and let him keep doing it every day.
    1
  1450. Um, ok, you say that like it's a bad thing. (?) What do you think the police did wrong?
    1
  1451. No, I'm not joking. I seriously don't know what you think the police did wrong.
    1
  1452. Dewdrop. The arrest was July 2021, and was completely justified, which you'd know, if you read the report. She committed suicide, completely unrelated to the arrest, in March of 2022. The arrest video was made public in November of 2023, probably as a result of a legal FOIA request. The release of the arrest video had no bearing on her suicide, because it was 1.5 years AFTER she died.
    1
  1453. I don't think that's true in Georgia. It varies by state. And, it makes no sense. An arrest isn't a conviction, it's just an arrest. I'm sure you meant CONVICTION, not just arrest, because you're innocent until proven guilty. But, it doesn't matter in this case. She gave up that career more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. And, if you're correct, and I'm wrong, ok, that's fine. Then she lost her license long before, with a million other arrests, and time spent in prison.
    1
  1454. Yes, in theory. But, for all practicality, this is easily negotiated down to a minor infraction, even with her long criminal history.
    1
  1455. The police never publicized anything. They kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it until long after she was dead.
    1
  1456. Huh? Bodycam footage is hidden when there's an open investigation. This particular bodycam footage was not released for 2.5 years, which was also 1.5 years after she died. She suffered ZERO public shaming for the bodycam footage.
    1
  1457. It was probably the result of a legal FOIA request.
    1
  1458. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  1459. And, by "basic research" - you mean you read my reply to your original posted message, which told you all of that stuff, and now you've deleted that message and posted a new one.
    1
  1460. Really? What media do you think even published anything about her before her death?
    1
  1461. Doubtful. I don't think she understood the word "embarrassed."
    1
  1462. I blaming you it's not knowing story whole and conclusions it's jumping too.
    1
  1463. Money from a viral video, yes, that was the outcome they wanted.
    1
  1464. So many wrongs in what you're writing. 1) Multiple people called the police, one of whom took a video of the incident, and showed it to the police. The police report says that this was hardly a discreet act that nobody saw, but, rather was a loud and very visible act in the public's view. 2) The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died, and had absolutely no relevance to why she killed herself. 3) The Smoking Gun article was published (no video), but, it wasn't a big viral thing. It was fairly minor. This woman had a heck of a lot of other stuff going on in her head, and it's unlikely that the word "shame" was even part of her vocabulary. 4) Embarrassment from the video had nothing to do with her suicide. She wasn't even alive when it was released. 5) Sue law enforcement? For what? They managed to keep the arrest video from being released for 2.5 years. It was probably a FOIA request that finally got the video. 6) Cruel and unusual punishment? So, if a man decides to put on a similar public display at a playground, and gets arrested, is it "cruel and unusual punishment"? What a standard you're setting. 7) You have absolutely no understanding of what happened here. Congratulations.
    1
  1465. But, dewdrop, the video DOESN'T claim that the arrest video was released before she killed herself. It's all a big word game. They ask questions, but don't provide the answers. It's all made for gullible people who swallow anything they present, while technically not outright lying. Just look the dates up yourself if you don't believe me. The arrest was July of 2021. Her suicide was March of 2022. The arrest video was made public in November of 2023. I'm sorry if you'd rather be one of the folks that they target with Inside Edition silly stories like this, but, hey, maybe you'll buy a bridge I have for sale?
    1
  1466. Well, there's not much the cops can do about legal FOIA requests. But, the "good thing" (minor consolation, but, whatever) is that they don't have to release the video until the case is long closed. They can keep it private if there's an ongoing investigation. And, in this case, the police managed to keep the video private for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she died. So, at least the poor woman didn't suffer any humiliation from the arrest video. Nobody saw it until she was long dead.
    1
  1467. Well, at least they never released the video of the incident itself. And, at least the arrest video wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    1
  1468. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1469. Why do you believe she wasn't aware that she was being watched? Because she said so, as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Blur = open investigation. This investigation has been closed a long time.
    1
  1470. So, with multiple people complaining, a video of the incident itself, you'd let her go instead of make an arrest for the misdemeanor she committed? And, what of her open warrants from her million other arrests? Naw, just forget those, right? I'm glad you're retired, because you couldn't have been very good at it.
    1
  1471. The arrest video was released 2.5 years later, as the result of a legal FOIA request. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  1472. Huh? First of all, she was dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video, or any other video about her. Secondly, Freedom of Information Act. Oh, but you go right ahead and pretend to understand things you don't.
    1
  1473. Yet, when I post in this video about the difference between infractions and crimes, my posts get banned. Yours goes right through, no problem.
    1
  1474. But, the police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. She was long dead before any "bullying."
    1
  1475. It's Inside Edition. Trash news.
    1
  1476. She destroyed her own life more than a decade when she walked out on her family, including her 6 month old son, and another son, in order to lead a life of drugs and crime. And, your timeline is all wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. There was no constant embarrassment from this arrest. She probably suffered a heck of a lot more from all of the rest of her arrests, and her felony term served in a Florida prison around 6 years ago. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1477. Yes, I agree. But, if there's one saving grace, the poor woman didn't suffer any embarrassment from the video going public.
    1
  1478. Of course. She admitted it. And, one of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police.
    1
  1479. She chose to put on a show in front of multiple people including children. That's a misdemeanor.
    1
  1480. Well, you could simply read the arrest report for that information. But, I warn you, reading it will also shatter your delusions about what happened here. She was a convicted felon who spent a term in prison and had a million other arrests. More than one person called about this incident. And, one of the witnesses recorded the event and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it sounds like she was making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. Still mad at the people who called?
    1
  1481. Yeah, like all of those guys at the playground. They get overwhelmed, watching the kiddies, nice beautiful day, and the next thing you know, they get punished for it.
    1
  1482. Well, there was no ordinance banning thongs at Cocoa Beach. There was such an ordinance at this particular beach. I mean, I agree, they probably need to change the ordinance. We don't live in a country that requires women to be covered from head to toe. But, be that as it may, according to the ordinance, the police were correct in asking her to leave.
    1
  1483. Really? How? And, what do you propose? The police aren't supposed to arrest someone who commits a crime?
    1
  1484. Well, the police blocked the arrest video's release for 2.5 years. She was dead for 1.5 of those years. They could no longer block a legal FOIA request after it's been closed for that long. What do you propose they do to continue to block its release?
    1
  1485. Of posted of didn't happen until of 2.5 of years after of the incident of of. Nobody of saw the arrest video of while she was of alive. Of the Freedom of Information Act of dictates of the public's right of access to of arrest videos of of.
    1
  1486. Well, everything you said is true... except the part that says, "Now this happened, what a tragedy." Her suicide was 1.5 years before this arrest video was ever made public. Don't just trust the cleverly worded Inside Edition story that is twisting what happened here. They do it for ad revenue. "Junkie with an arrest record and no job and a mountain of mental health issues turns to selling her body by the hour, and eventually destroys her life" doesn't go viral. But, "a young and healthy real estate agent embarrassed by a YouTube video commits suicide" goes viral and results in bunches of ad revenue.
    1
  1487. Um, ok. But, except for a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, none of the "splashing on the internet" even happened until long after she was dead.
    1
  1488. Well, here in the USA, if someone puts on a public show in front of children at a beach, they get arrested... especially ones with extensive criminal records like she had.
    1
  1489. Well, the police prevented the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, since she was dead for 1.5 of those years, they could no longer block the release due to FOIA. What more do you think they could have done?
    1
  1490. But, the news outlets never even touched this story until she was already dead for 1.5 years. How can they be held accountable for her suicide? Time machine?
    1
  1491. As a general rule, open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  1492. Why? What should they do differently?
    1
  1493. Let's not blame the criminal. Let's blame the honest people, right?
    1
  1494. Nope. Other than a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, this story wasn't seen by anybody until long after she was dead. And, you do know her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, right? If she gets embarrassed from exposure, she sure picked a strange career path. But, I imagine she didn't have many choices after her extensive criminal history.
    1
  1495. No, she wasn't.
    1
  1496. Except, one of the audience recorded it and gave the video to the police.
    1
  1497. Well, you could read the arrest report, you know. You don't just blindly trust Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  1498. It's public info, dewdrop.
    1
  1499. So, you haven't bothered to read the police report, yet, you think *I* am confused?
    1
  1500. Oh, wow, I thought that warnings didn't apply to crimes, and they only applied to infractions. Please, with your massive legal expertise, can you explain when the cops started giving warnings for crimes? All my life, I thought only infractions could have warnings. And, also, with your massive legal expertise, can you explain how much good it would do to deny the whole thing when one woman in the "audience" video recorded the incident with her cell phone? The cops described that video in their report as a very loud and very public display in full view of multiple people. I realize that it doesn't match the quiet and secluded version as spoken by a woman trying to avoid being arrested. But, hey, doesn't an actual video override what the woman says? You're the legal expert here. So, please explain?
    1
  1501. Well, nobody broadcasted the arrest video until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then. It wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death.
    1
  1502. What do you the justice system did to cause her death?
    1
  1503. So, if you were a cop, you'd decide for yourself whether to arrest someone for a crime? I thought police could only use personal discretion for infractions, not for crimes. I thought that if there's probable cause for a crime, we don't want our police to be the judge and jury, and we want the courts for that. But, you're clearly the legal expert here, not me, so, please explain? Oh, and by the way, one of the witnesses took video of the event, and showed it to the police. And, the witness said that she had been pacing up and down the beach, looking for a location to do this, then specifically chose a spot in view of multiple people including children. Her landlord said that her "profession" was, well, one of those things that we're not allowed to type on YouTube comments... ya know... one of those places involving lots of dollar bills that mostly men go to... where they put on a lot of shows. I suppose after her mile long arrest record and her term in prison for stealing cars, it was pretty difficult to get a real job.
    1
  1504. So, you're not a cop, but, you're going to double down and continue to pretend to understand things you do not. Sure. Right.
    1
  1505. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. Check it out sometime.
    1
  1506. Um, ok, what choice did they have with a legal FOIA request to do so? At least they were able to prevent the release for 2.5 years, right? Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1507. Huh? Please explain exactly how the cops messed up?
    1
  1508. Well, your opinions don't matter. She was getting arrested because she committed a crime.
    1
  1509. I wonder, is that what you'd say if it was a man at a playground?
    1
  1510.  @wolfenergy4219  Killed her by OD? Is that 9mm OD? Or, .22?
    1
  1511.  @wolfenergy4219  Nonsense.
    1
  1512.  @wolfenergy4219  Because the cause of death was a bullet.
    1
  1513. The video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. So, um, sorry, no.
    1
  1514. Or, you have fallen for Inside Edition trash news, and her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. I mean, why this arrest anyway? Why not her million other arrests? Why not while she was in prison? Why now, with this one insignificant arrest? This would easily be negotiated down to a minor infraction. Nobody in the public would be aware of it.
    1
  1515. She was dead 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video. They kept it private as long as they could.
    1
  1516. Huh? What do you think the cops did wrong here?
    1
  1517. They never blasted anything until long after she was dead.
    1
  1518. Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose to stop it? And, no, she didn't experience any shame over this video. It wasn't seen by anybody until after she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1519. So, that's how to handle aggravated misdemeanors? Just tell the person to leave? So, if it was a man cranking at a playground in front of kids, you want the police to just tell him to leave, nothing more?
    1
  1520. Another proud graduate of YouTube University Law School, huh?
    1
  1521. Well, this story was never on YouTube while she was alive. So, um, no, there was no humiliation from it. With the exception of a couple of obscure blogs that I've never even heard of, which posted an article about the arrest while she was alive, none of the big press covered a thing about this until long after she was dead. And, it's allowed because of the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1522.  @richardwalters9249  The arrest video wasn't released in ANY form until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1523. Why? What exactly is your assertion? What should they do differently?
    1
  1524. Yeah, but you're comparing apples to oranges. She wasn't embarrassed by the arrest video being viewed by millions of people, because none of those people saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  1525. Huh? What "fed" was even involved here?
    1
  1526. Really? They give warnings now for misdemeanors?
    1
  1527. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, um, no.
    1
  1528. Well, I'm not sure who you're talking about here. The Smoking Gun published an article. But, it was pretty obscure, and had nothing to do with her death. This arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. So, I doubt you can say anybody was "accountable" for that. So, can you elaborate? Who needs to be accountable, and for what?
    1
  1529. Of this of incident was of July of 1 of 2021. Of her of suicide of was March of 2022. Of the of arrest of video of was released of November of 24 of 2023. Of never of nobody of saw of the video of when of she was of alive. Of you of wrong.
    1
  1530. Um, ok, liable for what exactly?
    1
  1531. Yeah. When a guy is cranking at the playground, don't worry, the kids have seen worse.
    1
  1532. Well, she was guilty of that kind of theft also, so....
    1
  1533. Huh? She was dead 1.5 years before anybody saw this arrest video. And, sorry, you don't get warnings for crimes. You don't understand the difference between crimes and infractions.
    1
  1534. First of all, cops have that kind of discretion for an infraction (speeding, fishing without a license, parking in a no parking zone, etc.). They do not have that kind of discretion for a crime. In our society, we have empowered police to use discretion for infraction level offenses, but, not for criminal offenses. For crimes, we don't want police to be the judge and jury. We want the courts for that. You don't get a warning for a crime, but, you can get that for an infraction. Secondly, do you have any idea what happened here, beyond the 1 minute Inside Edition trash news story? Making a very long story short, she was a convicted felon with a prison history, and a mile long arrest record, and multiple open warrants for her arrest. For this incident, multiple people called the police, and one even took video. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version of a quiet act with nobody around. Quite the contrary. And, like it or not, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. Lastly, the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago.
    1
  1535. Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose the police do?
    1
  1536. Of she of probably of was making of "public beach" of content. She of was an of convicted of felon of who had of a million of other arrests of of. Her landlord of said she of was a stripper of the local club of.
    1
  1537. Only if you trust Inside Edition.
    1
  1538. And, this was your edited version?
    1
  1539. You do know that nobody ever saw the arrest video until after she was dead for 1.5 years, right?
    1
  1540. Says who? Inside Edition? Why would you believe it?
    1
  1541. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died in March of 2022. That doesn't change anything you wrote, but, just making sure you know that.
    1
  1542. The video taken by one of the audience would have been plenty. It was just convenient that she also happened to admit it.
    1
  1543. Yeah, but that was staged by the media. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, they showed the arrest video in late November and early December, but didn't mention that she was already dead for 1.5 years. Then, they came back around with an "update" that she was dead, and just didn't mention the dates, allowing people to falsely believe that the arrest video was the cause of the suicide.
    1
  1544. Huh? Freedom of Information Act. How do you prevent the release of the arrest video if someone submits a legal FOIA request?
    1
  1545. I'm sure they despise you too. They're doing their jobs. You're hating them for it.
    1
  1546. It took two weeks for you to come back with that silly reply? I presume you were in jail.
    1
  1547. Actually, this was nothing more than a choreographed double-viral "news" (not news) story. This arrest was from 2.5 years ago. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The arrest video was released to the public (FOIA request) on November 24, 2023. But, they wanted two viral rounds instead of one. So, they published the story about the arrest in late November, but didn't mention that she was already dead. Then, they released the "update" a few weeks later to say that she committed suicide, and asked "was she shamed to death over this?" But, of course, they don't answer their own question. The answer is no, this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide. But, "innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police, commits suicide" goes double viral. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral at all.
    1
  1548. Yes, the arrest was in July of 2021. But, her suicide was in March of 2022. The video was released in November of 2023. It had nothing to do with her suicide, contrary to what the sensationalist trash video makers want you to believe.
    1
  1549. Margie, I think you don't understand anything about our legal system. You get tickets for infractions. For crimes, you get arrested.
    1
  1550. The reason is called the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1551. Wow!! Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and had a million other arrests. One of the "audience" recorded the incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match this "nobody was around" story. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat. But, you really bought into the "innocent soccer mom" version, huh?
    1
  1552. Dewdrop, the police didn't release her arrest video until she was already dead for 1.5 years. And, with the exception of a couple of obscure blogs that almost nobody has even heard of, no media even covered this while she was alive.
    1
  1553. Yes, dewdrop. And, the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. None of this was ever on YouTube until long after she died.
    1
  1554. Since you find timelines too difficult, let me spell it out. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide (unknown exact date, discovered March 31, 2022). Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. It wasn't until AFTER then that it hit YouTube.
    1
  1555. Just checking here: you do know that the arrest video wasn't made public until long after her death, right?
    1
  1556. Well, I largely agree with your conclusions. But you clearly don't know anything about this. She suffered nearly zero humiliation, because only a couple of obscure blogs even mentioned this arrest while she was alive. None of the big media outlets covered this story until after the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023 (she died more than 2 years ago). And, if she felt so much "shame" over this, then maybe she shouldn't have decided to put on a show at a public beach in front of an audience that included children. I mean, you didn't believe her sob story about nobody being around, did you?
    1
  1557. Her term spent in a Florida prison and her million other arrests/convictions/judgements say "yes."
    1
  1558. Huh? Your wish was already granted. Yes, they don't release arrest videos for open investigations (except specific rare circumstances). This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. The case was already closed because she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1559. Inside Addition? Is that like the opposite of Inside Subtraction? And, sorry, but Inside Edition (spelled correctly) didn't destroy anything. They never covered anything about this story until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  1560. Well, I don't think they'll ever release the video taken by one of the "audience" who witnessed the crime. But, you can read the police report that describes the video.
    1
  1561. So, your philosophy is to just let criminals commit crimes and never report it?
    1
  1562. Of she? But, of one of the "audience" of recorded the incident and of gave of the copy of the video to of the police. It didn't of match her of sob story about of nobody being around of of. Between of the multiple callers of, and the of recording of the incident of, I'd of say they of caught her of red handed of.
    1
  1563. Putting on a public show in front of children is an aggravated misdemeanor.
    1
  1564. Yeah, with the number of times that she had been arrested, they probably had those made just for her.
    1
  1565. Freedom of Information Act. They can't block the release this long after she was already dead.
    1
  1566. They protected the video from being released for 2.5 years. But, once an investigation has been closed long enough (she was long dead by then), they have no choice but to release it due to the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1567. And, you believe that, why? Because she said nobody was around (as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest)? You believe her? Why?
    1
  1568. She didn't take her life because of social media. Social media never even touched this story until long after she was already dead.
    1
  1569. No. It has been ruled a suicide. Yes, sometimes people live through gunshot wounds to the head (about 10% of the time). She lived long enough to stumble around a while, and eventually bled out.
    1
  1570. Congratulations! You're the millionth person to post that comment, yet failing to actually explain what you'd have done differently.
    1
  1571. Dewdrop, you clearly came here to share your vast legal expertise with the world, yet, you refuse to say how they should have done better?? And, *I* am somehow the problem?
    1
  1572. Huh? Who "blasted" her? An obscure blog nobody has ever heard of?
    1
  1573. You remember this from almost 3 years ago? I doubt it. This incident barely got any press at all until long after she died.
    1
  1574. Yeah, but that was all a media ploy to get two viral video rounds out of one story. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died in March of 2022. So, they showed the arrest video in round one, but didn't mention that she was already dead for 1.5 years. Then, a few weeks later, they released the "update" video to say that she was dead letting people believe that releasing the arrest video made her commit suicide. They will never reveal the actual timeline, because that destroys the false narrative they're creating.
    1
  1575. There were multiple callers. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. I'm sorry if you blindly believed stuff you saw on Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), but, maybe this is a lesson.
    1
  1576. And you believe her sob story about being alone, why? Because she said so, as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  1577. Multiple people called over this incident. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her sob story about being alone. To the contrary, witnesses said it was an intentional act, and the video was a loud and public display in view of people including children.
    1
  1578. Why do you find her believable? She spent a felony prison term in Florida about 6 years ago. She had a long criminal history before and after that. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Failures to appear. Other thefts. You name it. But, you trust her?
    1
  1579. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1580. Family? You mean the husband, 6 month old son, and another son, she walked out on more than a decade ago because she preferred to live a life of drugs and crime? That family?
    1
  1581. Welcome to Inside Edition (where facts don't matter).
    1
  1582. Yeah, when you see a crime, don't call the police, because the criminal might have a family.
    1
  1583. Blaming the victim?
    1
  1584. So, they give citations for crimes now? I thought citations were only for infractions. Please explain? As for suing both, I'm not sure what you mean. Suing the woman in the "audience" who video recorded the incident? Or, sue the cops for the fact that they wear bodycams? You're not really explaining what you mean.
    1
  1585. Huh? They took her away from the crowd in the restaurant to question her. How much more privacy do you think is normal for an arrest? And, if she's so shy, why was she putting on a show at the public beach?
    1
  1586. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at a playground, let him alone, go look for zero dollar shoppers instead.
    1
  1587. They were quite discreet, but, somehow, I think you were trying to be sarcastic.
    1
  1588. Which video? The one of the incident itself? Or, the arrest video? The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later (she was long dead). The video of the incident itself has never been released.
    1
  1589. Well, almost correct. I'll add a few tidbits. What you're referring to is the Freedom of Information Act. And, yes, police can block a legal FOIA request if there's still an open investigation. And, that's what happened here. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, since she was dead for 1.5 of those years, the investigation was obviously closed for long enough that they could no longer block its release. So, the video was released on November 24, 2023. (This incident was July 1, 2021, and her suicide was in March of 2022.)
    1
  1590. Well, a couple of obscure blogs posted about this arrest, but, no "news" or social media covered it until the arrest video was released 2.5 years later. She was long dead before any of this went viral. So, I don't think the family has a valid suit. And, why this arrest? Should the family go after anybody for the woman's other million arrests?
    1
  1591. I hope you're happy with yourself for pretending to know things you don't.
    1
  1592. Start with the fact that multiple people reported the woman. And, then go on with what the video of the incident showed, and tell me that ANYBODY would go talk to her.
    1
  1593. Is this a joke?
    1
  1594. The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. What more do you want?
    1
  1595. Did you do it in front of an audience including children?
    1
  1596. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request. Sorry, but nobody saw the arrest video when she was alive.
    1
  1597. Who did this "humiliation" you're talking about? A couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of? And, if she was so sensitive to being arrested, maybe she should have thought of that before deciding to abandon her family and career 15 years ago to live a life of endlessly repeating crime and drugs, huh? She seemed to make it through her prison term in 2018 without harming herself. But, you think a couple of photos from 2021 that barely anybody ever saw... pushed her over the edge?
    1
  1598. Well, this wasn't her first arrest. She served time in prison about 6 years ago, and had an arrest record a mile long (before and after). But, yeah, her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. Inside Edition just likes ad revenue. "Innocent soccer mom kills herself after evil police arrest her" goes viral. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and eventually kills herself a year later" doesn't go viral.
    1
  1599. Guy at a playground cranking with kids around. Police come. "I was stressed." "Oh, ok, have a nice day."
    1
  1600. How exactly would they get her consent? She's DEAD!!
    1
  1601. No. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. (Most likely from a legal FOIA request.)
    1
  1602. No. I've done my homework. And, you're making stuff up. YOU show any date prior to November 2023.
    1
  1603. Why do you suppose it's viral NOW, rather than 1.5 years ago? Good grief. You just can't let go, can you?
    1
  1604. Yeah, when you see a guy at a playground cranking it in front of the kids, just go to a different playground. Mind your business.
    1
  1605. No, she was never shamed while she was alive. The media just wanted two viral rounds. So, they posted the arrest video (which didn't come out until 2.5 years later) and never mentioned that she was long dead by then. And then they posted the "update" that she was no longer alive, pretending that the first video caused the second video.
    1
  1606. What social media even covered this while she was alive?
    1
  1607. Nope. Not until 1.5 years after her death.
    1
  1608. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1609. 2) The statements given about a scuffle with a boyfriend 30 days earlier do not match with the medical examiner's report that states she was last known to be alive 12 days earlier. So, I'm guessing the scuffle had nothing to do with her death either, especially because nobody who heard the scuffle 30 days prior heard a gunshot.
    1
  1610. 3) There is no requirement to turn off the body-cam, regardless of the type of crime. There's always a risk that the criminal will do something during the arrest that needs to be recorded.
    1
  1611. 4) Her downward spiral started years earlier. She had lots of drug and alcohol issues, arrests, failures to appear in court, legal judgements against here for various thefts, and she did some prison time for stealing cars. Her family said she had gone "wild" and "off the rails" long before this incident. With her long history of failing to appear in court (which happened in this case also), and her attempts to change her name to avoid various arrests and judgements against her, yeah, it's not exactly unusual that this case never saw a courtroom before she committed suicide about 8 months later.
    1
  1612. 5) This arrest likely had nothing to do with her suicide, exactly for the reason you outlined. The only public exposure she had was on a cryptic tabloid site that I'd never even heard of. It's unlikely she suffered much consequence from it. And, the arrest video was never made public until long after her death. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1613. 1) She was found with a wound through the chin, upward, and the bullet went into the ceiling. There is absolutely no evidence of anybody murdering her. Unfortunately, she lived and stumbled around for a while before bleeding out. But, that's not as rare as it sounds.
    1
  1614. Yes and no. During an open investigation, they can block the release of the arrest video. But, eventually, once the investigation is closed long enough, the Freedom of Information Act dictates that the video is public information. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request.
    1
  1615. Well, you might have a point if the investigation was still open, but, since she was long dead before the video was released, your complaint has no merit. And, what happens to your suit when they simply reply "Freedom of Information Act"?
    1
  1616. Most likely, it was a FOIA request. I mean, they managed to keep the video out of the public's hands for about 2.5 years, or 1.5 years after she died. But, eventually, my guess is that someone did a FOIA request, and posted it on the internet. The original channel that posted it is gone now, so, I'm not sure if we'll ever know who/why.
    1
  1617. Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose to do?
    1
  1618. Probably yes. I mean, the video the audience took of the incident didn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it sounded a lot more like she was making "public beach" content.
    1
  1619. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. She was a convicted felon who had been arrested a million times for various crimes, served a term in a Florida prison, and abandoned her career and family to live a life of crime and drugs. It's difficult to get a straight job after that, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. The video taken of the incident itself (by one of the "audience") showed a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. But, you blame everyone else besides her, right? If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1620. Another proud YouTube University School of Law graduate, huh? Dewdrop, first of all, the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. There was no "death by shame" over this arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive. Nobody "sold" the video. The police blocked its release for 2.5 years. But, eventually, they can no longer block a legal Freedom of Information Act request if the case has been closed long enough. How about stopping pretending you know things you don't? Is that too much to ask?
    1
  1621. Freedom of Information Act = despicable?
    1
  1622. No proof? What about the video taken by one of the witnesses of the actual incident itself? And, sure, if she had bothered to show up in court, she could easily get the charges reduced. But, she hadn't shown up in court for most of her prior arrests, and didn't show up for this one either.
    1
  1623. Yeah, well, it's Inside Edition, after all. They're pushing the "innocent soccer mom" version of the story, instead of the reality of her prison term 6 years ago, her career as a "dancer" who did "private extras" with paying men, and multiple cases of theft, stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, etc. The "innocent soccer mom" story goes more viral than the "career criminal gets busted again" version.
    1
  1624. Who? Her family that she abandoned more than a decade prior to live a life of crime and drugs? Her husband and son who didn't even go to her funeral? Her fellow "dancers" at the gentlemen's club she worked at?
    1
  1625. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. That's when all of the media publicity happened. So, how did it "lead to" her death 1.5 years prior?
    1
  1626. So, what's your point? No law and order, let's encourage chaos?
    1
  1627. They should sue who? And, on what basis? What's the exact allegation?
    1
  1628. That was part of their plan. In actuality, she exited this world 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video. But, they wanted two viral rounds instead of one. So, they showed the news story without telling anybody she was long gone, and then they showed the "update" that revealed that she was, making people think the first round caused the second round. It's sneaky "journalism."
    1
  1629. She was the only one involved with her suicide.
    1
  1630. Well, in spirit, I definitely agree with you about the scruples of Inside Edition (lack of). But, I care even more about accuracy. And, the fact is, Inside Edition never published anything about her until long after she died... nor did any other news outlet. Other than a couple of obscure blog posts on sites nobody has heard of, nobody knew about this arrest until after the video was released on November 24, 2023.
    1
  1631. Virtually nobody covered this story while she was alive, so, um, no.
    1
  1632. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  1633. Well, depends on what you mean by "true." Did she commit suicide? Yes. Was it because of this arrest? No.
    1
  1634. One of the audience recorded the incident and showed the video to the police.
    1
  1635. Yes, I know that. But, your comment said that the cops didn't witness the act. My point was, yes, they witnessed it on video.
    1
  1636. The police report.
    1
  1637. Yes, well, the easier answer is simply not to commit crimes. But, anyway, yes, the video was apparently not very long. But, the witnesses said the incident itself was about 5 minutes. It sounds like nobody started taking video until toward the end, though. Still, it was enough for the cops to know that it happened.
    1
  1638. Wow, I don't think you could have gotten the facts more backward if you tried. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. It was the result of a legal FOIA request. With the exception of very rare circumstances, police do NOT release the arrest videos while there's an open investigation. And, since she was already dead for 1.5 years, they could no longer block the release of the arrest video.
    1
  1639. So, you're saying that this was a misdemeanor, yet, you expected them to just talked to her and helped her get through the day? Huh? With multiple callers? After putting on a show in front of children? If it was a guy cranking at a playground, would you recommend the same?
    1
  1640. What made you think this led to her taking her life? She sure waited a long time (almost a year). And, what was so special about this particular arrest? She didn't take her life over her other million arrests. She didn't take her life over the term she spent in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. So, why THIS arrest?
    1
  1641. With all of her open warrants, you don't think they were going to arrest her either way?
    1
  1642. In front of children.
    1
  1643. Multiple people called the police for this incident. One woman video recorded it with her cell phone, and showed that recording to the police, who described it in their arrest report. They describe a very loud and publicly visible display. It hardly matches the discreet and secretive incident as spoken by a woman who is trying to avoid being arrested. But, there's a silver lining of sorts, in that this arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she committed suicide. So, the poor woman didn't suffer any public embarrassment from the release of the arrest video.
    1
  1644. Just curious... if it was a man at a playground, would you say that the parents should just gather their kids and go to a different playground?
    1
  1645. Huh? Who told you it was a vacant beach? The woman trying to avoid getting arrested? Why would you believe her? Multiple people called the police over the incident. One of the people even recorded the incident with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their police report as a very loud and public event in view of multiple people, including children. I'm sorry if that doesn't match your viewpoint of blindly believing the woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested. But, here's a clue: "I didn't do it" is an awfully common claim, including from people who DID do it.
    1
  1646. Yes, I meant "I didn't do it" = nobody was around. I was paraphrasing. My point was that you're blindly trusting empty words spoken by someone who is attempting to avoid getting arrested. Yes, people were around. Else, how do you explain the multiple calls to the police, and the fact that one of the audience even took video?
    1
  1647. This was after she already headed for a different area. That's not the spot she did the act. And, yeah, the woman who recorded the incident was gathering evidence to show the police. My guess is that this was a new way for her to get her thrills. Her prior arrests were for stealing cars and public drunkenness. I guess this was her "next level."
    1
  1648. Huh? She wasn't shamed by the police video nor the "news" (Inside Edition isn't news, but, whatever), because the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead. What exactly do you want them to be held accountable for?
    1
  1649. Dewdrop, the police were called by multiple people. One of the "audience" recorded the incident, and showed it to the police. They describe the video as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. Sorry, but that's an arrestable crime.
    1
  1650. And, sorry if her version of a discreet act with nobody around doesn't match what the video showed. But, yeah, why do you trust someone who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  1651. See, with her mile long arrest record, her felony prison term she served for stealing cars, the multiple judgements for various thefts, the repeated drug and alcohol charges on her record, and countless failures to appear in court (including for this incident), with open arrest warrants and everything, yeah, it's tough to get a straight job after all of that. So, according to her landlord, well, her "career" pretty much matched what happened at the beach, ya know, one of those words you can't type on YouTube, involving cash transactions with lots of men, right? So, yeah, frankly, I think I'll stick with the version of the story as told by the innocent bystanders who recorded it on video, and the police report, rather than the claims of the convicted felon with a mile long legal record who was trying to avoid getting arrested again.
    1
  1652. And, as I repeatedly explained to you already in other threads, nobody was trying to destroy her. The police blocked the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was dead. But, eventually, a legal FOIA request can't be blocked once the case is closed too long.
    1
  1653. Nobody likes hatred, dewdrop. You should change your attitude.
    1
  1654. Thanks for proving you don't read responses to your postings in the various threads. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS ***AFTER*** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1655. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1656. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1657. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1658. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1659. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1660. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1661. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1662. The arrest video wasn't released UNTIL 1.5 YEARS **AFTER** SHE DIED, dewdrop.
    1
  1663. Apparently, people need to tell you things 100x before you understand. I'm not sure why you're so proud of this, but, I'm guessing you're blinded by hatred.
    1
  1664. Reading these comments is an insult to humanity. This woman had a mile long arrest record, including serving felony time in prison for stealing cars, and other things. She left her family behind about a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she does "private" encounters in her apartment with numerous men. She also had multiple failures to appear in court, resulting in open warrants. And, for this particular incident, multiple witnesses called, saying this was deliberate, and one of the audience even recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version of a discreet act with nobody around. It was very loud and public, in front of multiple people including children. Yet, people believe the woman? Blame the victims, right? Furthermore, July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = the arrest video was released. Nothing went viral until after that point. So, no, the arrest video didn't cause her suicide. Here's a clue, people: Inside Edition is trash news. Deal with it.
    1
  1665. I don't think that was her issue. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors said that she also did "private extras" for cash in her apartment with a parade of various men. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but, got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of it before they looked her up and found her million arrests and open warrants.
    1
  1666. Huh? What did the officer do wrong? Sarah Moss and her family saw the woman putting on a show on a public beach, and recorded it with their cell phone. They called the police, and showed the video to the officers, who wrote about it in their police report. They described it as a loud public display in full view of their family with children, that went on for a while (not the few seconds the woman is claiming). What would you propose the officer do, if not arrest her? As for "functioning member of society," well, I suppose anybody could have their own definitions of that term. But, at the time of her suicide, she was 86 pounds, estranged from her family, with tons of reports of drug addiction problems, and living on welfare, unable to make rent.
    1
  1667. But, the arrest video wasn't posted to any media until long after she was dead. So, no, she wasn't humiliated.
    1
  1668. The medical examiner's report said that her body was down to 84 pounds, and that's including the implants, which he noted were protruding quite unnaturally due to the extreme emaciation. She was in the 70s without the implants. It appears she dove deeper and deeper into drugs and self-abuse as time went on.
    1
  1669. Yup, start with her choice to abandon her family (including a 6 month old son, and another son) over a decade ago, in favor of living a life of crime and drugs... continue to the term she spent in a Florida prison... and end with her career choice of being a stripper at the local club.
    1
  1670. Who is "they"?
    1
  1671. Huh? Which video? The one taken by one of the "audience" who saw the event? Or, the police bodycam? And, what's the basis for the suit?
    1
  1672. That's some mighty big libel you're committing there. Dewdrop, they didn't cause anything. She was dead for 1.5 years before Inside Edition ever ran the story at all.
    1
  1673. Huh? On what grounds?
    1
  1674. Dewdrop, the cops were called by multiple people about this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded the event on cell phone, and showed the police the video. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version of a quiet episode outside the view of others. They describe it as a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. And, yes, I tend to trust the words of innocent bystanders who were able to capture video, and the police, before I trust convicted felons who served time in prison and have an arrest record a mile long. And, sorry, but, you clearly do not know the difference between an infraction and a crime. So, stop playing YouTube lawyer, and learn something before demonstrating this level of hatred.
    1
  1675. How? You remember from 3 years ago? Or, you remember from a few months ago when they posted the story without mentioning that she was already long dead, so they could get a second viral round for posting the "update" that she died?
    1
  1676. First of all, why would you believe her death was due to this? Because Inside Edition says so? Secondly, why would you believe she didn't openly expose herself to a bunch of people? Because she said so while she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  1677. No, this wasn't her first indiscretion. She was a convicted felon and served prison time for stealing cars, and had a mile long arrest record for other stuff. Correct: this arrest probably had nothing to do with her suicide, despite Inside Edition's attempts to skew the story to make it seem that way. She was never put on any registry, and probably wouldn't have anyway, even with her long criminal history. This would have probably been negotiated down to an infraction, had she shown up for court (which she didn't).
    1
  1678. "Mommy, what's that man doing over on that playground bench?" "Nothing, let's just go to a different playground, and let the nice man keep on doing it to others."
    1
  1679. They didn't air anything until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  1680. Well, I imagine we're in agreement then. I thought you were blaming her suicide on the media... when the reality is that virtually no media even covered this until after she was dead.
    1
  1681. The police video wasn't released until long after she died, you know.
    1
  1682. Yeah, this is Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. "Innocent soccer mom forced into suicide by evil police" goes viral. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral.
    1
  1683. 1) There is no assumption of privacy while in public. 2) The police wear bodycams. That's just a fact of life. 3) The Freedom of Information Act released the video. But, that wasn't until long after she was already dead.
    1
  1684. Huh? Freedom of Information Act. Did you get your law degree out of a gumball machine?
    1
  1685. What "original film"? As far as I know, the video of the event at the beach has never been posted anywhere.
    1
  1686. Sorry, when you said "original film," I thought you meant the video taken by one of the witnesses who called the police for the incident itself. And, yeah, as far as I know, that video has never been posted anywhere. As for the arrest video, it was released due to a legal Freedom of Information Act request on November 24, 2023. I fail to understand why anybody should be shamed for following the law correctly. If they didn't release it, that would be a felony. You seem to have your laws backward. But, why does it matter? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. She died almost 2 years ago.
    1
  1687. Really? Her prison term in 2018 didn't drive her over the edge. But, a year after this little arrest, it tipped her over the edge? As for anybody in her life, well, according to her neighbors, she did have those parades of paying men in her apartment, and her fans at the strip joint where she worked, but, no, she left her family and friends about 15 years ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Nobody even knew she was "gone" for a month or more, because nobody checked on her until her rent was overdue.
    1
  1688. Because a video told you so.
    1
  1689. Pfftt. So, you say not to trust reporters... while you trust reporters. The irony. Sorry for reality, but, that's what you get for trusting reporters. This video was not released until 2.5 years later. That's 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1690. The general rule is to blur for open investigations, and don't blur for closed ones. Anyway, when the media says "Freedom of Information Act," what do you think happens to your suit?
    1
  1691. How do you bully a dead person?
    1
  1692. So, a couple of hundred hits on a a couple of blogs nobody has heard about made her commit suicide? Why none of her other million arrests? Why not her felony term served in a Florida prison? No, it was THIS arrest, then she waited a year, then decided she couldn't take it?
    1
  1693. Freedom of Information Act. And, you clearly don't know the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = release of the arrest video.
    1
  1694. The story wasn't sensationalized until long after she was dead, so I reject your first statement. The family (and others) who reported her did exactly what they're supposed to do when witnessing a crime: ask the authorities to handle it.
    1
  1695.  @daphnetruman  But, it didn't. This arrest had nothing to do with it.
    1
  1696. Do you mean the video of the actual "incident"? They never released it. Or, do you mean the entire arrest video (which you will find easily on YouTube)?
    1
  1697. Well, the saving grace (if you can even call it that) is that nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  1698.  @Dr.pikachuu  Where'd you get your law degree? A gumball machine?
    1
  1699. I wish I had a dime for every person who said it wasn't dealt with correctly, yet, won't name how to do it instead. As for being discreet, what more do you want? They took her away from the restaurant, outside the earshot of anybody. They prevented the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. And, I cannot help but point out the irony that she plopped down on a beach and cranked in front of people, including children, and you're complaining about being discreet...? She was a convicted felon with a mile long arrest record, time spent in prison, and her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1700. Huh? Why?
    1
  1701. Freedom of Information Act. What exactly do you propose that the police do about it? But, the police managed to keep this video private for 2.5 years. She was dead for 1.5 years before this video was released.
    1
  1702. Wouldn't matter. One of the "audience" caught it on video and showed it to the police.
    1
  1703. It was probably a legal FOIA request that released the video. But, what charges do you want to see here? The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death. I mean, you don't just blindly believe Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  1704. The obvious answer is "no." The answer to your other question = Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1705. Hilarious!!! Dewdrop, you have your timeline wrong. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022 (unknown exact date). Body found = March 31, 2022. Arrest video released to the public = November 24, 2023. And, sorry, but, if she wasn't ashamed from her million other arrests, it's pretty doubtful she'd get ashamed over this one. And, what with her felony prison record, numerous arrests for drugs and alcohol, stealing cars, multiple judgements for different thefts, bunches of failures to appear in court, and open warrants for her arrest, yeah, it's pretty difficult to get a straight job after all of that. So, her landlord said her job was, well, one of those words you can't type on YouTube comments, ya know, involving cash transactions with lots of men, you get it... seems difficult for me to believe she'd be all that ashamed over this beach incident.
    1
  1706. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = the arrest video was released. So, how exactly did they kill her by releasing the arrest video, dewdrop?
    1
  1707. Loitering isn't even an infraction in a lot of places, let alone a misdemeanor. And, where it is, it's usually only if aggravated by dealing drugs or something more serious. Sorry, but I don't think you understand how these different offenses rank, and when police have discretion to issue a warning, vs. when they don't. There is no "warning" for indecent exposure. And, with her criminal history and long list of failures to appear in court with open warrants, yeah, let's get real here, she was getting arrested.
    1
  1708. Huh? What did the cops or media do wrong?
    1
  1709. I can't understand why this is even a question.
    1
  1710. Multiple people called the police about this incident. One of the "audience" even caught it on video, and showed the video to the police. In the police report, they describe it as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. But, you're saying that she shouldn't be arrested? Why? Because you believe the words of a convicted felon with a mile long arrest and prison record?
    1
  1711. Almost no media even covered this story until 2.5 years later. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody in "the media" ever covered this. The only exception was an obscure article on a website I've never even heard of. None of the big media covered anything about this until long after she was dead, because that's when the arrest video was finally released.
    1
  1712. I can't understand why this is even a question. What did the cops or media do wrong?
    1
  1713. Well, they didn't post anything while she was alive, so, posting after her death was their only option.
    1
  1714.  @humdinger7723  My dead wrong? Sorry, dewdrop, if you can't spell it, you don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  1715. Huh? Nobody ever saw this video until she was already dead for 1.5 years. And, she didn't seem all that ashamed about her prior mile long arrest and prison record. Why would she be ashamed about this?
    1
  1716. First of all, it seems that you don't know the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. This story got almost zero coverage while she was alive. So, right out of the gate, your accusation that the arrest video led to her suicide is wrong. Nobody even saw it while she was alive. Secondly, it seems that you know nothing about this woman's history. She abandoned her career and family a decade ago, including a husband and 6 month old boy, because she wanted to live a life of crime and drugs. She served a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. She's been arrested a million times, and has had multiple convictions and judgements. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drug charges. Alcohol. Failure to appear, etc. It's not easy to get a straight job after all of that, so, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with a parade of various men. Third, multiple people called for this incident, not just the one family. Witnesses say it was an intentional act. One of them even managed to get the last few minutes on video, and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about nobody being around. It was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Now, it's up to you if you want to believe she thought she was alone. But, I'd trust innocent bystanders who were able to take video, and the police, before I'd trust this convicted felon. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but, got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  1717. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground, it happens all the time, let him be, he wants to crank again tomorrow.
    1
  1718. A warning for this misdemeanor offense? What? With her extensive criminal history?
    1
  1719. Yet, you won't say what the police should have done differently?
    1
  1720. And, you still won't say... because you have nothing.
    1
  1721. My slow? Or, was that your 2nd grader attempt at spelling "you're"? When did they start issuing warnings for a crime? I thought that was only for an infraction. You're clearly the legal expert here, so, enlighten me.
    1
  1722. Huh? Accountable for what?
    1
  1723. And, you got your law degree from where? YouTube University?
    1
  1724. Huh? You think they give citations for that misdemeanor? And, with all of her open warrants and past felony history, do you really believe they had any choice? Even if they looked past the misdemeanor, they'd still need to take her in.
    1
  1725. But, they never covered a single thing about this woman while she was alive. So, no, they weren't part of any reason for anything.
    1
  1726. Huh? There was no misconduct here.
    1
  1727. Huh? This story leaves out a million crucial facts, and intentionally spins the story to be misleading. I will never support such things. But, there was no misconduct.
    1
  1728. Oh? Please tell me when they started giving warnings for misdemeanor crimes?
    1
  1729. Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose the police do? And, by the way, July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = the video was released.
    1
  1730. Huh? She wasn't embarrassed by the release of the arrest video. She was already dead for 1.5 years before the arrest video ever went public. Sorry if Inside Edition doesn't tell you that. But, hey, they have viral videos to produce, after all. Can't make them viral by telling the truth, can they?
    1
  1731. But, the news and social media didn't air the story until long after she died.
    1
  1732. Lots of people say those exact words, but, none of you ever say the basis for the suit, and who?
    1
  1733. Huh? She put on a show at a public beach in view of multiple people including children, but, her ARREST was too embarrassing?
    1
  1734. She certainly made herself into a spectacle at the beach. But, how was her arrest made into a spectacle?
    1
  1735. It's Inside Edition. Of course it's not real. I mean, yes, she's really dead now. But, this story is quite skewed.
    1
  1736. Yes. I wish people would realize when a "news" story is nothing but a big manipulation. When they open the story with a question, but never actually answer the question, yeah, you know you're being manipulated. Sad that so many people can't pick up on these clues and go verify whether the story is valid or not.
    1
  1737. Um, ok, accountable for what?
    1
  1738. How'd they do that?
    1
  1739. That's some very sound advice. However, in this particular case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match her version of a quiet little act with nobody around. She was getting arrested whether she said anything or not. Plus with her mile long record, felony prison term, mile long list of arrests for various crimes, and open warrants for no-shows in court, yeah, if she wasn't arrested for the beach incident, they'd have still arrested her.
    1
  1740. OK, and how would you propose to prevent it?
    1
  1741. Stop pretending to understand topics you do not.
    1
  1742. Which media has blood on their hands?
    1
  1743. Really? And, you believe her, why? The witnesses said it was intentional. The video taken by the witnesses doesn't match her version about nobody being around. She has a million other arrests on her record (including a felony term served in prison). Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. But, you find her credible? I have this bridge for sale....
    1
  1744. Can you name any social media that even posted this story before she died?
    1
  1745. Yeah, when you see a guy at a playground cranking it in front of the kids, just leave him alone.
    1
  1746. Well, the news media had nothing to do with it either. The arrest video wasn't even made public until she was already dead for more than 1.5 years. I mean, you don't actually trust what you see on YouTube videos, do you?
    1
  1747. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1748. First of all, multiple people called the police, and one person even caught it on video and showed it to the police. It wouldn't matter if the woman said a single word or not, she was going to get arrested. And, if not for this offense, they'd have arrested her for any of the open warrants for her tons of prior arrests and no-shows at court. And, the police didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. None of the big media outlets covered this story at all until the arrest video was made public. So, no, they didn't cause her death, because she was already dead before anybody in the public saw any of this.
    1
  1749. Yes, that's called delusion. Anybody who informs you that you're wrong get ignored instantly.
    1
  1750. Well, the story is mostly fake. But, sadly, she did commit suicide. The silver lining (albeit a minor one) is that she never suffered any humiliation from the public seeing this arrest video. It was kept confidential for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. That's something that Inside Edition will never mention, because that kind of story doesn't go viral. It goes viral when they manipulate the facts, use clever wording, ask questions without answering them, and presenting a false narrative.
    1
  1751. Of course not. It's Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1752. You have your order of events incorrect. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Famous/viral = December 2023.
    1
  1753. Well, that's what happens when you watch a 1 minute video from Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), and actually believe them. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this sob story about "nobody was around." To the contrary, it was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Why do you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who served time in a Florida prison, had a million other arrests, and according to her landlord, was a stripper at the local club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1754. And, when those people say "Freedom of Information Act," then what? What happens to your suit?
    1
  1755. Well, that's just a media trick to begin with. The first time they showed the video, she was already dead 1.5 years. The second time was the "update" that they wanted to make you believe that the first release was the reason she killed herself. It's how they can manufacture viral videos out of nothing.
    1
  1756. I think you do not understand the timeline here. I mean, I don't blame you per se, because Inside Edition sure isn't going to share it... kind of destroys the false narrative that made this a viral video. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. National TV and social media = December 2023.
    1
  1757. The police got multiple calls about this incident. One woman even used her cell phone to record what was going on, then showed the video to the police. They described it in the arrest report as a very loud and visible display in the public. This is quite different than the claims of the woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested. But, if it was so private, and nobody saw it, how would you explain why multiple people saw it, called the police, and one person even video recorded it? Still believe the woman who was trying to avoid getting arrested? Or, do you believe the crowd of people and the police?
    1
  1758. Oh, and they released the video probably because of the Freedom of Information Act. After enough time goes by and the case is closed, they can't keep the arrest video private any longer, and must release it for a legal request. But, the silver lining is that the woman never suffered any humiliation over the release of the arrest video. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1759. FOIA requests.
    1
  1760. Huh? You remember this arrest from 3 years ago? Or, were you referring to one of her other million arrests?
    1
  1761. You remember a news clip from 2.5 years ago? What channel even covered it?
    1
  1762. You don't have any understanding of the topic. Almost no media even touched this story until she was long dead.
    1
  1763. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry to burst your bubble, but, the police withheld the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after her death. Nobody in the public ever saw this video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1764. Except she wasn't humiliated. Why do you think she was? Because Inside Edition asked that question (and never answered it)? You do know that Inside Edition is trash news, right?
    1
  1765. You're the one who believes Inside Edition, and thinks a stripper with a million arrests is somehow humiliated over another arrest.
    1
  1766. Well, that sounds nice and all. But, one of the "audience" took video of the incident, and showed it to the police. Guess what? The witnesses' and police's version of what was in that video doesn't match what this woman said while trying to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time. She was getting arrested whether she said a single word, or not.
    1
  1767. So, basically, you haven't yet read the police reports.
    1
  1768. What does that even mean? What about the witness video?
    1
  1769. 3) Freedom of Information Act. But, you do know it wasn't published until long after she died, right?
    1
  1770. 4) Again, Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1771. 2) Do you really not understand police body cameras?
    1
  1772. Well, perhaps if she had bothered to show up in court, they could have mandated some of that counseling. Is it the justice system's fault that she habitually skipped her court dates after getting arrested?
    1
  1773. And, if people sell machine guns to anybody, including teenagers, they get arrested also.
    1
  1774. I think they did pretty well. They were called by multiple people about this incident. One woman who saw it used her cell phone to video record it, and showed the police. They describe the contents in their police report, saying it was a very loud and public display in full view of multiple people including children. This is quite a bit different than the version portrayed by a woman trying to avoid getting arrested. But, I tend to believe the police and the crowd of people who saw her, instead of believing the woman. They really didn't have much choice but to arrest her. Then, the police managed to keep the arrest video private for 2.5 years. It wasn't until she was dead for 1.5 years that they released it, probably as a result of a legal FOIA request (then the cops have no choice, since the case was closed for a long time). But, anyway, I'm all ears. What exactly do you think the police did badly?
    1
  1775. Multiple people called the police. One witness even caught it on video, and showed the video to the police. The arrest report describes the video as very different than the woman's words when she is trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time.
    1
  1776. Well, at least that didn't happen until long after she died.
    1
  1777. And, I blame the people who commit the crimes.
    1
  1778. But, dewdrop, one of the "audience" recorded the incident and showed the video to the police. Did you not read the police report? They describe the video as a very loud and very public act in view of multiple people including children. One of the witnesses said that she wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, then plopped down near a family with children.
    1
  1779. OK. But, one of the "audience" did take video. She was going to get arrested whether she said anything or not.
    1
  1780. Tell, me, would you be saying that if it was a man at a playground? "Excuse me sir, can you please put your pants back on and go somewhere else?"
    1
  1781. Lying won't get you anywhere.
    1
  1782. Well, that's only because you fell for a typical media-created storyline. They wanted two viral rounds for the price of one. So, they first put it on the news that she was arrested (not mentioning that she was already dead). Then, they came back a few weeks later with the "update" that she had died, hoping people would believe that the first video caused the second. In reality, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, and this incident received near-zero coverage until 2.5 years later (long after she was dead).
    1
  1783. No leaks required. Freedom of Information Act. And, what charge is "incriminating misconduct"? You're the legal expert here, not me, so, can you explain this charge? Oh, and you do know that the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died, right? You do understand how the Freedom of Information Act works, right?
    1
  1784. Freedom of Information Act. What would you recommend the police do about it?
    1
  1785. Dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years AFTER she was already dead. And, it was released as a result of the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1786. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA. None of the big news outlets covered this story until after then. So, please explain how the police or news caused this? That's a mighty big piece of libel you're flinging around while knowing nothing.
    1
  1787. Well, don't worry then, Inside Edition isn't exactly known for honesty in reporting. If you read about this woman, you will find out that this incident probably had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  1788. Well, first of all, there was no way to have the events go down that way, because she didn't show up at court. That's apparently how she chose to handle all of her various arrests, just don't show up. She even tried changing her name a few times to evade the police, but, that got blocked, so, yeah, "failure to appear" seemed like her main tactic. It's very difficult to negotiate for probation or counseling when you don't even show up to the hearing. Second chance? She was on her MILLIONTH chance already!! Good grief. After she got out of prison, she continued to commit crime after crime after crime. And, you're sitting there talking about "second" chances?
    1
  1789. Nobody even saw the video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1790. Nearly zero "news" covered any of this until long after she was dead. So, um, no.
    1
  1791. Well, you got your wish. Of course it's fake news. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Her arrest video had absolutely no effect on her, because she was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody ever saw it.
    1
  1792. She plopped down in public and put on a show. She didn't deserve what, exactly?
    1
  1793. Yeah. That's how this goes. They get a 2.5 year old video. They know she's already been dead for 1.5 years by the time the video was released. But, they post it and never mention that. Then, a couple of weeks later, they post a "follow up" saying that she's dead now, and asks if the arrest had anything to do with the suicide. They don't answer the question, they just ask it, and pretend that the question IS the answer. The real answer is no. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw this arrest video.
    1
  1794. Well, I agree. But, at least the poor woman didn't suffer any embarrassment from the arrest video, since it wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  1795. She ended her own life.
    1
  1796. Welcome to Inside Edition. She was already dead for 1.5 years the first time they aired the story. But they didn't say so. Instead, they ran the story again a few weeks later, revealing that she was dead, hoping people would think that the media had something to do with it.
    1
  1797. Huh? Blame the victim?
    1
  1798. What people did that? Who is "these people"?
    1
  1799. WHOSE hands? Who is "their"?
    1
  1800. Well, according to the report of the video taken of the incident, the video doesn't match her claim of a private little thing with nobody around. It describes a very deliberate and loud public display in view of multiple people, including children. Doesn't sound very unintentional to me. And, as for embarrassing her even more, um, ok, but who do you think did that? The obscure Smoking Gun article? Did anybody even see it? It seems like the arrest video was what went viral, so, I'm not really sure why you'd say she suffered embarrassment.
    1
  1801. What embarrassment? I still don't know what you're saying.
    1
  1802. Aww, you poor thing.
    1
  1803. With her extensive criminal history, I'll bet she knew that. But, my guess is that she probably thought that staying silent would mean 100% odds that they'd look up her open warrants, but, by trying to cry her way out of it, there'd be a 50/50 chance they'd let her go without running a check.
    1
  1804. The police didn't post anything. Freedom of Information Act. The police kept the video private for 2.5 years. But, after she was already dead 1.5 of those years, they can no longer block a FOIA request.
    1
  1805. Wrong timeline there. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = release of the arrest video. Inside Edition = fake news.
    1
  1806. At least is wasn't aired until long after she was dead.
    1
  1807. And, who says she passed away because of this? Inside Edition?
    1
  1808. It wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her "nobody was around" sob story she's crying about as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  1809. Well, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. So, I imagine she was desensitized to people seeing her doing that stuff. But, regarding taking her life, if you look up her history, the timeline, and everything else, I'd say it's pretty doubtful that this arrest had anything to do with her decision to kill herself.
    1
  1810. Yet, she waited a year before the straw broke? And, sure, with her lengthy arrest history, felony term in prison, all kinds of troubles, and a career at the "dance club" (yeah, that kind), abandoning her family more than a decade ago (including a 6 month old son and another son), to live a life of crime and drugs, um, ok, she was stressed.
    1
  1811. We might never know who, because the channel was deleted. Why? Because of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. When? 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  1812. Just curious here... if it was a man at a playground... doing, ya know... would you go up and see if he needs any help?
    1
  1813. So, the police have control over the Freedom of Information Act now? smh
    1
  1814. And, how do you think an arrest works? They phone you to make an appointment?
    1
  1815. Citation for a misdemeanor? Huh? And, sorry, but cuffs go with the arrest.
    1
  1816. Nice way to duck the fact that you don't have the foggiest understanding of what an infraction or crime is.
    1
  1817. Huh? No "media" did anything to her, at least not when she was alive. The arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years after the incident, which was also 1.5 years after her suicide. What EXACTLY do you think "the media" is accountable for in this case?
    1
  1818. Would you go up to a guy cranking it at a playground in front of kids and have a conversation?
    1
  1819. Accountable for what, exactly? I don't understand.
    1
  1820. The police camera video wasn't released until November 24, 2023, as the result of a legal FOIA request. How do you suppose they can block it, after she had been dead for more than 1.5 years? They can only block FOIA requests for open investigations. This matter had been closed for over a year, because she was dead.
    1
  1821. It was probably a legal FOIA request. And, please explain exactly what you believe the PD is accountable for?
    1
  1822. I don't really understand your comment. She was arrested because she did it in the public eye.
    1
  1823. Huh? No news station even covered this until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1824.  @nimo6972  Hilarious!! She gave up her career and family about a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. She did a felony prison term in Florida about 6 years ago. She had an arrest record a mile long. You think this arrest would make any difference? Her landlord and neighbors said she was a stripper at the local club, who also did "private" transactions in her apartment. I'd hardly think this arrest would matter for her "job." Yeah, but you keep on pretending to know things you don't. You're a real hero.
    1
  1825. All freedoms have limits. The freedom of speech doesn't allow you to yell "fire" in a movie theater (unless there's a fire). The freedom to bear arms is limited to not being machine guns, and not by felons, and not by children. And, the freedom to express yourself doesn't include putting on a sex show in front of children.
    1
  1826. Naw, unlike you, they probably know the real story, instead of this highly modified version Inside Edition presents.
    1
  1827. Probably because it was a legal FOIA request. The police can only block those for so long. After the case is closed for a long enough time, they can't block it any longer. They managed to keep this video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. But, eventually, I guess they just can't block it any longer.
    1
  1828. The police didn't post it. They kept it private for 2.5 years. But, eventually, they couldn't block a legal FOIA request to release it. She had been dead for 1.5 years, so they could no longer block the release of the video.
    1
  1829. Huh? How they handled what? You just acknowledged that she should be arrested, so, ok, that part was handled fine. You then spewed some stuff about socioeconomics and collective society. But, you mentioned nothing whatsoever about what you think anybody actually did wrong.
    1
  1830. Well, none of this went viral until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. So, it didn't cause her suicide in March of 2022.
    1
  1831. They didn't, dewdrop. The Freedom of Information Act did. And, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1832. No, she was not convicted.
    1
  1833. I'll bet that the family knows darned well not to trust a single word out of Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). And, they probably know that her suicide had absolutely nothing to do with this incident.
    1
  1834. 1) Yes, police arrest couples all the time. Why would you believe they don't?
    1
  1835. 2) The police report only mentions women's names that called about this incident. The witness that took video of the event itself was also a woman.
    1
  1836. 3) Police didn't post the video online. It was a result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. The police blocked the release until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. So, if you're under the impression that the video caused her to commit suicide, you clearly do not know the timeline of events. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  1837. 4) You have confused an infraction with a crime. Police can give a warning for an infraction. But, for a crime, they perform an arrest. We don't want cops to be the judge and jury for a crime. But, for an infraction, such as speeding, fishing without a license, parking in no parking zone, etc., then yes, the police have that discretion.
    1
  1838. 5) Yes, of course police know about the criminal history. That's why this woman was going to get arrested either way. I mean, the video taken by a witness was already plenty of evidence to confirm that her story about a quiet and discreet act with nobody around was completely bogus. But, yes, with her mile long arrest record, her felony history, time served in prison, and open warrants for numerous failures to appear in court, yes, she was going to get arrested no matter what else happened.
    1
  1839. 6) It is shameful that Inside Edition and YouTube make money from stuff like this, however, comparing it to mental wellbeing is wrong, because, as I explained, she was long dead before anybody saw this video.
    1
  1840. 7) If she had bothered to show up for court for this arrest, the judge could have ordered her some counseling to get that wellbeing that you're talking about. But, she never showed up. Instead, she attempted to change her name a few times to evade police (from this arrest and the millions of other arrests).
    1
  1841. 8) You do know her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right? You do know that her neighbors said that she also did "private" cash encounters out of her apartment with numerous men, right? It doesn't really affect anything else I mentioned, but, it does affect the notion that she was "shamed" by being exposed to the public, given that she did the exact same stuff every day at the club, that she was doing on this beach.
    1
  1842. Yes, but, it wouldn't have mattered, because one of the "audience" recorded it and showed it to the police. But, yeah, she certainly had a long enough criminal history and time in prison to know that she should remain silent. But, my best guess is that she figured it was a better move to try to cry her way out of it before they looked her up and would find all of the open warrants.
    1
  1843. The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long gone by the time anybody saw it. This arrest had nothing to do with her departure.
    1
  1844. Who? The guy who also accuses somebody of murdering her? The guy who doesn't think cops should do their jobs?
    1
  1845. Who shamed her, and how?
    1
  1846. Freedom of Information Act. But, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1847. Is that what you say when it's a man at a playground?
    1
  1848. Yes, they don't release the arrest videos while there's still an open investigation. Since it was 2.5 years later, and because she was already dead for 1.5 of those years, they had to release the arrest video on November 24, 2023. The investigation was closed for long enough, and there was no choice in the face of a legal FOIA request.
    1
  1849. Real estate agent? Because Inside Edition labeled her as that? She had given up real estate around a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors also claimed she did "private" cash work in her apartment with numerous men.
    1
  1850. It came down to one upload? What? July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = her suicide. November 24, 2023 = the arrest video was released. So, um, no. I'd say it's a heck of a lot more likely that it was her felony term she already spent in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and that she decided to continue her drug and crime spree when she got out. She tried changing her name a few times to evade the police, but, the courts wouldn't let her. She kept postponing by refusing to go to court for multiple arrests (including this one), and I imagine the weight of her life's failures kept adding up. I don't think it all came down to an upload that didn't even happen until long after she died.
    1
  1851. But, dewdrop, this story wasn't on YouTube before she died. So, why do you attribute YouTube to her suicide?
    1
  1852. Open investigations vs. closed ones. And, how exactly did the police cause this?
    1
  1853. Well, that's probably good advice. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the witnesses recorded it and gave the video to the police. Plus, my guess is that, with her extensive criminal history, she probably knew not to talk, but, I imagine that they probably didn't want them looking up her open warrants, so, she maybe figured she could cry her way out of it before they searched the computer.
    1
  1854. Huh? That makes no sense whatsoever.
    1
  1855. And, what does that have to do with this video of someone getting arrested for committing a crime?
    1
  1856. The laws classify and break down various offenses. An offense is either an infraction (such as speeding, or parking in a handicap spot, or fishing without a license, etc.), or an offense is a crime (misdemeanor or felony). Indecent exposure is classified as a crime. She was arrested for committing the crime. We know she did so because she admitted it on camera (especially in the full version of the arrest video), and even apologized for it. We also know because multiple witnesses called the police, and one of them took video of the crime, and showed it to the police. Even the version she admitted to is already a crime, but, the video version doesn't match the version she's telling about a quiet act with nobody around. But, you go on and keep pretending to know things you don't. That's what you use YouTube for, right?
    1
  1857. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  1858. Yet, you don't say what they should have done differently?
    1
  1859. Huh? No major media outlet ever even covered the arrest until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1860. Authorized by the Freedom of Information Act. Benefit = ad revenue to media.
    1
  1861. Tell me, if it was a man at a playground, would you say the same?
    1
  1862. Well, (a) I don't believe you'd do that. And, (b) I grew up in a society that knows not to take things into their own hands, but to call the police to deal with crimes.
    1
  1863. Yeah. I agree. But, the only saving grace is that she wasn't alive when this arrest video went public. It didn't get released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1864. But, this footage was never shown to the world until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1865. How do you embarrass someone who is dead?
    1
  1866. After her mile long arrest record and felony prison term for stealing cars, drug and alcohol charges galore, many failures to appear in court, and judgements against her for various thefts, it's probably difficult to get a regular job after that. But, anyway, I doubt she was embarrassed, regardless of how she was acting while trying to get out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  1867. One of the witnesses caught the incident on video, and showed it to the police. They wrote about it in their arrest report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  1868. According to her landlord, her "profession" (which I can't write in YouTube comments) involved putting on those kinds of shows already. Ya know, involves cash transactions with lots of men.
    1
  1869. And, just checking here... you do know that nobody saw the arrest video until she was dead for over 1.5 years, right?
    1
  1870. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
    1
  1871. Police cuffs i dont story but the putting her in this is the.
    1
  1872. But, she suffered nearly zero humiliation, because 99.99% of the coverage of this didn't even happen until long after she was dead.
    1
  1873.  @Calebsnyder-lv2cg  She died more than 2 years ago, dewdrop.
    1
  1874. Just checking here... you do know that the arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years after the arrest, right? You do know that she was already dead 1.5 years by the time anybody ever saw the arrest video, right? It's not really clear whether you know that or not. (?) Secondly, yes, I agree, the arrest video shouldn't have been shown. However, I don't really have any solution to defy the Freedom of Information Act. They can block legal FOIA requests while an investigation is still ongoing. But, 2.5 years afterward, and 1.5 years after she was already dead, I don't know how they can block it any longer. Do you have a solution?
    1
  1875. First of all, the arrest video was not made public until she was dead for 1.5 years. Secondly, yes, she had a legal/arrest/prison history a mile long.
    1
  1876. Huh? Single indiscretion? She had a mile long arrest record. Stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, other thefts, failures to appear, etc. She did a felony term in a Florida prison 6 years ago.
    1
  1877. Unfounded garbage.
    1
  1878. No, what's weird is that you pretend to know things that you clearly do not.
    1
  1879. See what I mean? An AR isn't automatic, dewdrop. The rest of what you wrote is equally wrong.
    1
  1880. Automatic weapons were banned decades ago, dewdrop.
    1
  1881. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, you have it backward anyway. She died long before the arrest video was released.
    1
  1882. Explain?
    1
  1883. Blame the victims instead of the criminal, eh?
    1
  1884. Um, ok, sues who? And, on what basis?
    1
  1885. The arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw it. And, if she wasn't embarrassed by her felony prison term, and the mile long list of other arrests and judgements against her, it's pretty doubtful that this particular arrest was all that embarrassing.
    1
  1886. You're lying in this comment.
    1
  1887. And, you believe she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? I mean, the information you're asking for is in the arrest report, which you're welcome to read. But, I will warn you, that will open the door to shattering your delusions that Inside Edition is painting an accurate picture here. They're not.
    1
  1888. Huh? I don't understand your point. This was a suicide.
    1
  1889. "the officer who did a wrong cause of her death" Huh? The medical examiner wrote the cause of her death. Suicide by gunshot to the head. What cop said otherwise? What in the world does this even mean?
    1
  1890. First of all, it didn't lead to anything. Stop blindly trusting trash news. Secondly, thanks, but, I think society has already decided that this activity in front of children is illegal. The rest of society doesn't care if you want to promote that sort of thing, but, if you do what she did, you'll get arrested, just like she did.
    1
  1891. You don't know anything about this. No, this arrest didn't lead to anything. There was virtually zero publicity about it while she was alive. Two obscure blogs posted something about it. But, the big viral press didn't happen until November 24, 2023 when the arrest video was released. She died two years ago. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, let's just make this clear... her landlord said she was a stripper, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters out of her apartment. So, to say she was shamed by being exposed is really ridiculous. And, she should have been pretty used to the legal system by then, what with the term she spent in prison about 6 years ago, and the million other arrests before and after. So, to claim this one petty arrest made all that much difference to her.....?
    1
  1892. No, she wasn't on the news until she was already dead 1.5 years. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. On the news = December 2023.
    1
  1893. Yeah, that's not bad advice. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" captured the event on video, and showed it to the police. She was getting arrested whether she spoke or not.
    1
  1894. Well, sure, if it's the cop's first day on the job, and they blindly believe anything someone says, yeah. But, in this case, there were 3 cops involved because of the multiple calls from witnesses about this. They reported that it was intentional. And, one of them even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It didn't match her version about being a quiet act with nobody around (her story as she is attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and is worried that she might end up back in prison again).
    1
  1895. See, with her being a convicted felon who spent time in prison, and her mile long arrest history, she was probably hoping that crying about nobody seeing her would perhaps avoid the cops running her name and finding the open warrants from her failures to appear for other prior arrests. See, it's difficult to get a straight job after all of that, so, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with numerous men. So, a seasoned police officer probably knows not to just blindly trust what someone says while trying to avoid getting arrested, and would question the credibility of such a person. Meanwhile, watchers of Inside Edition don't question much of anything.
    1
  1896. As a side note: I have this bridge for sale. Inside Edition says so. Interested?
    1
  1897. Well, the medical examiner's report said that she was last known to be alive on 3/19 of 2022, and they found her dead on 3/31. So, it wasn't a month. But, yeah, still, I agree, 12 days is a long time for someone with a family to let that go. But, yeah, her life was clearly going downhill. Apparently, she was so estranged from her own sons that one of them didn't even go to her funeral (so the reports say, I don't know for sure). And, in this arrest video from 2021, she looks to be fairly healthy. But, the medical examiner's report said her body weighed 86 pounds. So, in the approximate year between this arrest and her suicide, she lost a lot of weight. Reports also blame that on drug use. But, again, I don't know anything personally. The medical examiner also said that her implants were jutting out from her emaciated body in such a way that even more emphasized how unhealthy she had become. But, "the public footage was the last straw"?? I don't get it. The footage wasn't released to the public until November of 2023. She had been dead for over 1.5 years before the public even knew her name. I'm not sure that I understand your point here.
    1
  1898. Blur = open investigation. Don't blur = closed investigation. And, nothing about her was on the news until long after she died.
    1
  1899. Well, you're clearly the legal expert here, not me, so, can you explain when they started issuing tickets for aggravated misdemeanors like this one? And, with her long list of open warrants, do you really think they weren't going to arrest her?
    1
  1900. OK, then lobby to get the ordinance changed.
    1
  1901. OK, but, where this incident happened, the laws were different.
    1
  1902. OK, wasn't that my first reply?
    1
  1903. And, here I was, thinking we were on the same page and having a friendly conversation. Thanks for making it more clear about your tone.
    1
  1904. Freedom of Information Act. But, why would you believe her ridiculous claims in the first place? Do you REALLY believe all of the witnesses and 3 cops were wrong, and you just blindly accept the words of the convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long?
    1
  1905. If none of her other million arrests mattered to her, nor her time spent in prison, I doubt that this arrest mattered that much to her.
    1
  1906. Yes, one of the audience recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Congratulations on your 1 minute of knowledge from Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), without lifting a finger before forming opinions.
    1
  1907.  @DavidKen878  Yes, but one of the "audience" who witnessed her beach show recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to police.
    1
  1908.  @DavidKen878  Dewdrop, the original poster complained that there was no video. Yes, there was.
    1
  1909. But, nobody saw the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  1910. So, when you don't know anything about the topic, you double down and spew more gibberish?
    1
  1911. Well, how about NOT pretending you know things you don't?
    1
  1912. The news outlets didn't cover this until long after she was dead... so... no, they didn't ruin her life... she did that all on her own.
    1
  1913. I tried putting this into Google translator, but, it still came out as gibberish. Can you maybe post this in your native language, and then people can translate on their own?
    1
  1914. Yes, they did their jobs perfectly. But, something tells me that you blame them for doing their jobs, huh?
    1
  1915. You handcuff people you're arresting. That's how it works. And, the police didn't make it a spectacle. Whoever did the FOIA request for the arrest video did that (which was on a channel that no longer exists, so, who knows if we'll ever know who did it?). The police managed to keep the arrest video out of the public's eye for about 2.5 years, which was about 1.5 years after she killed herself. I'd say the police did pretty well. Why do you think otherwise?
    1
  1916. But, viral videos about attractive women don't go viral if they don't show the attraction.
    1
  1917. Most likely as a result of a FOIA request. But, the original channel that published it is gone now, so, I wonder if we'll ever know who it was.
    1
  1918. Freedom of Information Act. If they get a legal FOIA request, what could they really do about it? They held the video private for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 of those years. They can no longer block it due to an open investigation. The case was closed because she was long dead. So, yes, they had to release it.
    1
  1919. I have a bridge for sale for any commenter here who buys this sob story about nobody being around. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison around 6 years ago. She walked out on her family (including a 6 month old boy) about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. She had an arrest and judgment record a mile long, including stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear in court, more thefts, etc. One of the audience caught this incident on video and showed it to the police. The video doesn't match this sob story about a secluded act outside the view of others. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" transactions out of her apartment. Oh, but Inside Edition shows people a minute long video, labels her as a real estate agent and innocent soccer mom, and the crowd gobbles it up. BLAME THE POLICE!!! BLAME THE PEOPLE WHO CALLED!!! Good grief. I'd assume she was making a "public" video to promote herself before I'd believe a single word out of her. And, by the way, this arrest was July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. And, the arrest video was released to the public due to legal FOIA request on November 24, 2023. So, no, this arrest video didn't cause her suicide, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1920.  @nimo6972  Sorry, dewdrop, but you don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  1921.  @nimo6972  You need to stop trusting trash news like Inside Edition, and go read the police reports, arrest record, interviews, and court judgements.
    1
  1922. Huh? She was already a mother of two boys (two different fathers). She left her husband and two sons (one of them was 6 months old) around a decade ago in favor of living a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of drugs and crime.
    1
  1923. Huh? July 1, 2021 = arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  1924. My response was directed at the other person (who apparently deleted her comment and ran away).
    1
  1925. And, when the news company says "Freedom of Information Act," then what do you think happens to your suit?
    1
  1926. I don't know what you're talking about, and neither do you.
    1
  1927. They blindly believe trash they see on Inside Edition.
    1
  1928. Pushed? Pushed by what?
    1
  1929. They probably feel sorry for people who believe a single thing seen on Inside Edition.
    1
  1930. First of all, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. Secondly, Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1931. Well, with the exception of an obscure website that posted an article, it was private until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  1932. Well, releasing it before she committed suicide would have been worse. And, sorry, but the Freedom of Information Act is not a faux pas.
    1
  1933. The arrest video was released 2.5 years later, as the result of a legal FOIA request. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  1934. Except one of the witnesses had it on video. And, with this woman's mile long criminal history, and numerous open warrants, she was getting arrested either way.
    1
  1935. For a misdemeanor with multiple complaints? And, ok, they'd still need to arrest her for all of those open warrants. So, what difference would a ticket make?
    1
  1936. Indecent exposure = misdemeanor, aggravated by the fact that it was in front of children. Multiple people complained, one of whom recorded it and gave the video to the police. Witnesses say it was intentional. And, the video doesn't match her version about nobody being around. She could deny it until the cows came home, but, she was going to get arrested no matter what. Plus, with her long criminal history, time served in prison, million other arrests, failures to appear in court, etc., let's be honest here, she was getting arrested that day. Period.
    1
  1937. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests. One of the audience recorded the incident and gave a copy to police. It doesn't match her "nobody was around" version. It was a very loud and visible show in front of multiple people including children.
    1
  1938. Because, dewdrop, it reflects on her credibility.
    1
  1939. Or, you could use this thing called "the internet" to find out for yourself.
    1
  1940.  @marcusv6134  Dewdrop, I have READ THE POLICE REPORTS AND CRIMINAL RECORD. Good grief.
    1
  1941. Freedom of Information Act. No "leaks" required.
    1
  1942. Who embarrassed her, and how?
    1
  1943. Then, wouldn't that mean she embarrassed herself? Who is the who you were referring to?
    1
  1944. But, dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  1945. Just checking here... it's not clear... you do know that the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later... right? It was 1.5 years after the suicide, and one had nothing to do with the other. Just checking here.
    1
  1946. Multiple people called the police about that incident. One person video recorded it with her cell phone, and showed the police. The police report describes it as very loud and very public, hardly the quiet and discreet picture that the drug addict is trying to paint in order to avoid arrest.
    1
  1947. Dewdrop, multiple people called, not just one family. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her story about nobody being around. To the contrary, witnesses said the woman wandered up and down the beach to select a spot, and specifically chose one in front of an audience.
    1
  1948. She was a convicted felon with a term spent in a Florida prison, and a million other arrests. Drugs and alcohol, stealing cars, other thefts, you name it. With that kind of record, it's tough to get a straight job, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  1949. When you see a guy cranking it at the playground in front of kids, mind your own business, so he can keep doing it every day!!!
    1
  1950. Shame on that person in your mirror!
    1
  1951.  @marcusv6134  Or, you could read the arrest report, and find out that you're wrong.
    1
  1952. I don't really 100% understand what you mean. But, if she wanted the police to say anything to her, maybe she should have shown up for her court dates, and should not have kept trying to change her name to evade the police, eh?
    1
  1953. It didn't lead to anything. Why would you believe Inside Edition?
    1
  1954. Information presented to you? By Inside Edition? Hilarious! What was that comment about less than two neurons?
    1
  1955. Doubtful. There were multiple people who reported it. One of them even recorded the display on video, and showed the video to the police. The police report says the video showed a very loud act in front of multiple people including children. The witnesses said that she had wandered up and down the beach, then plopped right down in front of people, and went at it. I realize this is different than the words spoken by the woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time, but, hey, you clearly want to believe Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  1956. As opposed to what? Scaling the walls/fences in handcuffs?
    1
  1957. Huh? A stripper got caught at a public beach doing something illegal. And, this is the "peak of America" and the "fabric of society is damaged"? Drama queen?
    1
  1958. WHO treated her badly?
    1
  1959. OK, on what basis?
    1
  1960. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released and news outlets covered it.
    1
  1961. Oh, that's hilarious!! The convicted felon who spent time in prison, with the mile long arrest record, drug and alcohol charges, stealing cars, other thefts, etc., turned stripper and prostitute, couldn't stand the shame of her millionth arrest, and took her own life (a year later), because a couple years after that, the news would cover it? Is that what you're saying? You do know that virtually zero news outlets covered this story while she was alive, right?
    1
  1962. Almost no news outlets covered this story while she was alive. She was long dead before this made news anywhere significant. Also, you do know that she was a convicted felon who did time in prison and had a million other arrests, right?
    1
  1963. Reputation?!?!?! According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. According to her neighbors, she did "private" encounters for cash in her apartment with numerous men. Yeah, she's got a real reputation to preserve, and wouldn't want to be caught exposing herself.
    1
  1964. Here's a clue: when calling people derogatory names regarding intelligence, it's best not to write it in a sentence where you demonstrate that you think you make words plural by putting an apostrophe in there. Kinda backfires on you.
    1
  1965. Bravo on swallowing the utter garbage fed to you by Inside Edition. You're a real hero. This arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide, despite Inside Edition's attempts to skew the story that way. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. This woman suffered ZERO effects from the release of the arrest video, because she was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody ever saw it.
    1
  1966. There were multiple callers, not just one. And, yes, that's what we're supposed to do in a society when we see a crime, call the police. Where's the accountability in your logic? Why is the woman not responsible for her own crimes, instead of the responsibility falling upon the people who report the crimes? If I see a bank robber, and I call the police, and later something bad happens to the bank robber, am I at fault?
    1
  1967. Who is "they" (who publicly shamed her)?
    1
  1968. Sorry, but that makes no sense at all. July 1, 2021 = arrest. March 31, 2022 = body found. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. You said she suffered shame from the release of the arrest video, and the media coverage, but, none of that happened until she was dead for more than 1.5 years. Is it really too much to ask that people should at least know the slightest bit about a topic before determining that everyone else in the world is "doing it wrong"?
    1
  1969. And, if you worked at the police department, and got a legal FOIA request for the video, you would commit a felony and refuse to release it? (By the way, the video wasn't released until long after she was dead.)
    1
  1970. That's not a reply. Don't give me this "I'd release it to my boss" answer. Fine, you're the boss, now what?
    1
  1971. And, why do you believe she thought nobody was around? Because she said so, as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again?
    1
  1972. And, of course, the other person deleted her replies and ran for the hills.
    1
  1973. No, it wasn't you. Someone else came in here spewing gibberish.
    1
  1974. But, if you answered my original posting, I didn't see it. The question still remains to you... what would you do instead of releasing the video?
    1
  1975. Nope. The arrest video didn't get made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she committed suicide. Keep your hatred to yourself. And, stop falling for deceptive Inside Edition videos. Good grief.
    1
  1976. Um, ok, but, I fail to understand your assertion....?
    1
  1977. But, almost no media covered this until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  1978. What in the world do you think they did wrong?
    1
  1979. She gave up her life as a realtor (and her family, husband, son, and other son who was only 6 months old) about a decade ago to lead a life of drugs and crime. After her prison term about 6 years ago, she continued her drug and crime spree until she died. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. She had been arrested a million times, stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear, etc. And, when she died, nobody even knew about it, and her body was not found until the landlord went in to find out about overdue rent. The medical examiner's report said she was well into the maggot phase of decomposition, and weighed 84 pounds. That's how long she was gone, with absolutely nobody looking for her. Yes, she really seemed to have her life together indeed!! As for the incident itself, multiple people called about it. One of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match the version she's sobbing about as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest. Oh, but, sorry, you said it wasn't handled well. Care to explain what you would have done differently?
    1
  1980. Naw, I'm sure they're well aware that the picture Inside Edition is painting here is quite far from the truth.
    1
  1981. Ad revenue.
    1
  1982. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1983. Not exactly. If there's an open investigation, they generally don't release the bodycam, even if there's a FOIA request. But, this investigation was long closed, because she had been dead for 1.5 years. So, yeah, they had to release it.
    1
  1984. Doubtful. Extremely doubtful. I mean, even though she was a convicted felon who did time in prison and had an arrest record a mile long, this particular incident would likely have been negotiated down to a minor infraction, do a little community service, see a counselor, and it would be over. But, she never showed up to court (as usual for her). And, this incident wasn't going to make her life any more of a struggle than it already was. Being a felon couldn't have been easy for her, especially with the long list of other judgements and charges for various things including drugs and alcohol. I doubt that one more arrest was really going to matter that much.
    1
  1985. What didn't you understand here? Did you even read my message? The odds that she would be registered as a SO were extremely low. Something this minor is almost always negotiated down. Why must I type this twice?
    1
  1986. Also, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, the neighbors said that she also did "private" cash transactions from her apartment with bunches of men. I seriously doubt she would really be worried about SO status (which, again, like I said, was very unlikely anyway).
    1
  1987. Of they could of? Could of how of? Of you don't of say of how?
    1
  1988. By plopping down in front of a bunch of people including children, and putting on a show? And, how was she "punished"? The cops quietly took her outside the restaurant to talk to her outside of the view of the crowd. And, then she was arrested. She should have been pretty used to arrests by then, what with her mile long legal history, prison time for stealing cars, multiple judgements against her for various thefts, open arrest warrants for failing to appear in court repeatedly, numerous drug and alcohol charges, etc. So, yeah, getting arrested for the millionth time probably wasn't all that embarrassing to her, otherwise she'd quit committing crimes, huh?
    1
  1989. Oh, the irony. Before I would even bother responding with details about her mile long arrest record, felony prison term, and her "profession," first, I'd ask if you actually believe the trash you see on Inside Edition. Do you?
    1
  1990. Yes, it's called the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  1991. So, you came to your conclusion without knowing the answer to your question? Dewdrop, they showed her face because of the Freedom of Information Act. They don't have a choice. However, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. They successfully blocked that for 2.5 years.
    1
  1992. Just because Inside Edition asks the question about being "shamed to death," doesn't mean the answer is "yes." This arrest got almost no coverage until long after she died. And, with her extreme criminal history and felony prison term, she should have been pretty used to being arrested by that point.
    1
  1993. Huh? How do you "bully" a dead person?
    1
  1994. How does that even makes sense? You complained about showing the face in the video. Now you're changing topics (and you're equally wrong).
    1
  1995. It's not that simple. The Freedom of Information Act permits it. It's not legal for YouTube to tear down this video. For their own protection, YouTube has elected to NOT be legally liable for the content of the videos. That means that, unless it's illegal, or a copyright violation, or something like that, they're not legally allowed to tear a video down, whether it's in good taste or bad taste. If they do, then that opens the door for YouTube to be legally responsible for the content of a billion other videos. They don't want that. They want to remain neutral and non-liable.
    1
  1996. I don't think I'd be hoping for karma if I was in your shoes.
    1
  1997. I don't understand. What exactly do you think the police should have done differently?
    1
  1998. All arrests result in handcuffing here.
    1
  1999. And, we have the Freedom of Information Act. This allows the release of these kinds of videos, as long as the case has been closed long enough. I definitely agree with you. I wish this video was never made public. I just don't know how to stop it, because that's the legal process. But, the one saving grace is that she never suffered any humiliation from it, because the arrest video was not released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death. Nobody saw this video while she was alive.
    1
  2000. Yeah, but, that wasn't going to matter here. One of the witnesses caught it on video and showed it to the police. But, yeah, with her long criminal history, you'd think she'd know not to talk to the police. My guess is that she didn't want them to find out about her open warrants for her arrest. If she said nothing, they'd certainly check. But, maybe by trying to talk her way out of it, she figured they wouldn't check her record?
    1
  2001. She was a convicted felon who served prison time 6 years ago, and had a million other arrests. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" in her apartment with a parade of men. Multiple people called about this incident, one of whom recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It didn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Oh, but you go right ahead and keep pretending you know things you do not. It's what YouTube is for, right?
    1
  2002. Secondly, if she had shown up at court, even with her extensive criminal history, this would be negotiated down to an infraction.
    1
  2003. Third, sorry, but she had already left society about a decade ago, when she ditched her career and family in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. She served some felony time in prison around 6 years ago. And, she picked up right where she left off, continuing her life of drugs and crime. She had a million arrests for drugs and alcohol, stealing cars, other thefts, failures to appear in court, etc. This one arrest was just a drop in the bucket, and not even her own family thinks it had anything to do with her suicide a year later.
    1
  2004. And, sorry, but "I was relieving myself in public and now I'm on that list" is a lie to cover up for what they really did.
    1
  2005. Yeah, let's blame the victims and not the criminal herself!!
    1
  2006. And, you were doing so well... until the last couple of sentences. The arrest video wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years. She suffered zero embarrassment from it, because nobody saw it until she was long dead. And, with her mile long legal/arrest/prison record already, it's doubtful that one more arrest would have made much of a difference. She should have been used to getting arrested by this point.
    1
  2007. Well, they probably had to release it as a result of a legal FOIA request. But ,you'll be relieved to know that it wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death. I'm sorry that Inside Edition doesn't mention that, but, hey, they have viral videos to manufacture, whether true or not.
    1
  2008. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public (Freedom of Information Act). So, um, no.
    1
  2009. Um, ok, but, what's the basis for a lawsuit? I don't quite get it.
    1
  2010. Yet, you won't say HOW it could have been handled differently?
    1
  2011. Well, at least the arrest wasn't posted on any social media until long after she was dead.
    1
  2012. No, you didn't. It wasn't even released until November 24, 2023.
    1
  2013. Well, first of all, multiple people called, and one of them even got it on video and gave it to the police. So, right out of the gate, your solution wouldn't work. But, beyond that, with her extensive criminal history, she probably knew not to talk to the police. But, given the number of warrants for failures to appear, my guess is that she didn't want them to look her up. Had she stayed silent, there was a 100% chance that they'd look her up. But, maybe she figured there'd be a 50% chance if she tried to talk her way out of it, they'd let her go before they looked her up.
    1
  2014. It doesn't work that way. You clearly do not understand the difference between infractions and crimes.
    1
  2015. No. That's a product of clever (and deceptive) wording. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = arrest video made public.
    1
  2016. Well, now that's a fine way to demonstrate that you didn't read the arrest report. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this "nobody was around" sob story she tries to present as she is trying to avoid her millionth arrest. Witnesses say that she wandered up and down the beach, looking for a spot, and deliberately chose one in view of multiple people including children. With her felony term spent in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and other convictions/judgements for stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear, etc., I find her credibility to be ZERO. Personally, I'll trust the innocent bystanders and police before I'll trust a single thing she says, but, hey, you believe whatever you want. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2017. Who humiliated her, and how?
    1
  2018. Is that how you deflect the question? Pretend that I'm the one who doesn't know the answer?
    1
  2019. Well, the police can block a legal FOIA request to release the arrest video if it's an open investigation. And, that's what happened here. They blocked the release for 2.5 years. But, for 1.5 years of that, she was already dead, so, with the investigation closed, they couldn't block the requests any longer.
    1
  2020. The arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Something that ruins Inside Edition's fake story.
    1
  2021. Bodycam. And, nobody saw the arrest video until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2022. They give warnings for aggravated misdemeanors now?
    1
  2023. People used to sell their daughters into slavery also. What difference does it make today? Why should we live by caveman standards? Answer the question: when did they start giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors? That's what you argued for.
    1
  2024. Huh? Almost no media covered it until after she was dead.
    1
  2025. How much shame do you think she really suffered from this arrest? A couple hundred hits on obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of?
    1
  2026. Inside Edition said it, you believe it.
    1
  2027. Dewdrop, the cops took her away from the restaurant crowd so that others couldn't hear what was going on. And, then they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw the arrest video. How did they "shame" her?
    1
  2028. Huh? How does "social media" and "the internet" ruin the life of someone already dead?
    1
  2029. Well, this was her millionth arrest. None of her prior arrests, nor the term she spent in prison, stopped her from committing crimes. Why would this one arrest have a different result?
    1
  2030. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. 99.99% of the coverage never happened until the arrest video was released. And, sorry, but the path to the car was through the restaurant. So be it.
    1
  2031. How? Inside Edition et. al. never posted a darned thing about this incident until long after she died.
    1
  2032. Nobody saw the arrest video before she died. July 1, 2022 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    1
  2033. Huh? Not that they needed permission in the first place... but... hypothetically, how would they get permission from a dead person?
    1
  2034. How? None of those outfits ever covered this story until long AFTER she was dead.
    1
  2035. Her suicide happened on an unknown date in March of 2022, dewdrop.
    1
  2036. But, this arrest video was not made public until 1.5 years after she died. I mean, you don't actually believe Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  2037. Karen's what? You didn't finish your sentence.
    1
  2038. So, cops aren't supposed to arrest criminals? What?
    1
  2039. Well, that's a lot of words that don't mean much of anything. If you can't actually specify who you think shamed her, then what good is anything you just said?
    1
  2040. That's your excuse for not answering?
    1
  2041. Dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released to the public until long after she was dead. She suffered virtually no shame from this incident. And, let's face reality here, she was a stripper who was performing the same thing at the beach as she did at the local club where she worked. I'd hardly think she felt much shame anyway.
    1
  2042. So, people shouldn't get arrested if they commit a crime?
    1
  2043. Correct. She was long gone before that happened.
    1
  2044. Who is "them"? And, on what grounds?
    1
  2045. Well, I'd argue that she didn't feel any shame, because the bulk of this never saw a speck of media until she was already dead for 1.5 years. But, yes, that's one of the deplorable agenda in the media that you're talking about, and I agree with. The media doesn't want to spell out that this incident happened 2.5 years ago, and that she was already dead 1.5 years by the time the arrest video was made public. Instead, they want to play word games to make their videos go viral, at the expense of accuracy in reporting.
    1
  2046. Because everything you see on Inside Edition is totally true.
    1
  2047. As for the "blow up," the police managed to block the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. What more do you expect? Eventually, though, after an investigation is closed for long enough, they can no longer block a Freedom of Information Act request. And, given that she was dead for about 1.5 years, yes, the investigation was over, and they had to release it.
    1
  2048. Yes, everyone knows that if you say the words, "I am stressed," the police aren't supposed to arrest you.
    1
  2049. But, the arrest video was first aired on November 24, 2023. She died 1.5 years prior.
    1
  2050. Oh, such a nice girl. Served a felony term in prison 6 years ago. Arrest record a mile long for stealing cars, various other thefts, repeated failures to appear, drug and alcohol charges, etc. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment. Her family said that she abandoned her husband and 6 month old son a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Yes, very nice girl. Sure.
    1
  2051. Inside Edition said so, therefore it's true.
    1
  2052. "I don't understand why they had to report this on the Smoking Gun website." Well, I think they report gun related deaths, right? "She was not an incorrigible criminal." Well, she was a criminal, with multiple arrests for various things. I don't know about "incorrigible." "She had a major lapse in judgment. She broke the law. She deserved to be punished under the law." But, she wasn't punished. She got off without any conviction for this incident. "She did not deserve to have her entire life ruined by this one crime." But, it wasn't. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death. And, well, given that she had already been married and divorced, estranged from her family, and (as the reports say) suffering from some major mental health and drug issues, yeah, I'd say that those things had a lot more to do with her suicide than some arrest that wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. I mean, the medical report said that her body weighed 86 pounds, and that her implants were jutting out in such an unnatural way that really emphasized how unhealthy her emaciated body had become. Apparently, she was in quite a downward spiral in the year (or so) between her arrest in this video, and her suicide. So, um, no, I don't think this one crime had anything to do with her death. "That woman's life was ruined. Absolutely ruined. She felt shame and remorse for what she had done." Huh? She made a public show on a beach, which was video recorded by a family who saw it. They showed that video to the cops, who wrote about it in their police report. They say it was quite a loud and drawn out public display. I don't think "shame" was part of this woman's vocabulary. And, she didn't suffer any convictions for it. And, the arrest video was not made public until 1.5 years after she died. So, what "ruin" do you think, she suffered? "But not a soul involved in this debacle that ended in her death will feel the slightest bit of shame or remorse." The only "soul" involved in her death could be found in her own mirror.
    1
  2053. Google offers a free translator. You might want to try it next time.
    1
  2054. And, you believe what you believe, why? Because a convicted felon with a mile long arrest record said she didn't think anybody was around, while she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest? Trust the criminal? Distrust the police and the innocent bystanders?
    1
  2055. It's not likely that this arrest had anything to do with her suicide a year later. Very few people even knew about it. None of the really big viral stuff came until 2.5 years later. And, why this arrest anyway? Why not her felony prison term in Florida, or any of her other million arrests? THIS one arrest was special, and caused her to take her own life?
    1
  2056. Huh? You do know that this arrest video wasn't public until she was already dead 1.5 years, right?
    1
  2057. Not likely. Even with her mile long arrest record and her felony term she served in prison, it's still pretty doubtful that this minor thing ends up with her on any lists. It would probably be negotiated down to a minor infraction, a little community service, a little court ordered counseling, and that would probably be the end of it. There were 9 months between this arrest and when she killed herself, so, there would have been plenty of time for her to talk to attorneys and stuff. But, as was frequent for her, she never showed up to court for this arrest to ever negotiate anything. Plus, in her line of "work" (cough cough, not a real estate agent as they show in this video, because she gave that up a decade ago), ya know, being registered on that list doesn't matter. I imagine most of her "customers" would probably think it was a good thing for her to be on that list.
    1
  2058. Wouldn't matter. One of the "audience" caught it on video and showed it to the police.
    1
  2059. Yeah, if you see a guy at a playground cranking it in front of kids, you're definitely just going up to him while he's doing that, and asking him to stop, and that's it, right?
    1
  2060. Yes. And, her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind), and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. Literally NOBODY was looking for her, and she remained in her apartment for about a month until the landlord went in to get the overdue rent, and found her. I guess she had zero friends or family.
    1
  2061. Um, ok, but, just checking here: you do know that the arrest video wasn't seen by anybody until 2.5 years later, and she was long gone by then, right?
    1
  2062. Gotta love when people confess to misdemeanors or felonies on YouTube comments.
    1
  2063. Be more specific? Who should have been quieter, and how?
    1
  2064. Who is "them" and what's the basis?
    1
  2065. Well, since the audience took video of the incident and gave it to the police, it wouldn't matter whether she admitted it or not.
    1
  2066. Huh? Do you not know the difference between crimes and infractions? A warning? What?
    1
  2067. First of all, what choice do they have? Freedom of Information Act. Secondly, they didn't release the video until 1.5 years after she was dead. Thirdly, not a criminal? Felony prison term for stealing cars. Multiple judgements for various thefts. Long arrest record for alcohol and drug charges. Numerous failures to appear in court and open arrest warrants as a result. Not a criminal? Oh, and what she did in this video was a crime also.
    1
  2068. Moral of the story: go back to high school to learn to read and write. And, get some morals while you're at it.
    1
  2069. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  2070. For an aggravated misdemeanor?
    1
  2071. A) You don't get a warning for a crime. You have it confused with an infraction. B) No.
    1
  2072. I'll bet your arrest and prison record is as long as hers.
    1
  2073. Yeah, the only saving grace is that nobody showed the footage while she was alive.
    1
  2074. Which wave did you see? The little blogs 2.5 years ago? Or, the wave of media that covered it when the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023?
    1
  2075. How would you prevent it?
    1
  2076. Learn the difference between an infraction and a crime. Good grief. Is it really too much to ask that people understand something about the laws before passing judgement on people?
    1
  2077. And, sorry, but with her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, million other arrests, open warrants, etc., there was NO WAY she was getting out of there without being arrested.
    1
  2078. The police department managed to keep this video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years AFTER she died. And, when it was released, it was likely because of a Freedom of Information Act legal request. You cannot murder someone who has already been dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2079. How much of a contributing factor? If you weigh all of the rest of her million arrests, her term spent in a Florida prison, her complete lack of friends and family (that she walked out on more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs), etc., how much do you think this one arrest mattered? Almost nobody even knew about it until long after she was dead, contrary to the false picture painted by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter).
    1
  2080. Agreed. But, in this case, at least nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, they're not talking about her extensive prior record, prison term, or her career at the local "dance" club.
    1
  2081. @ Even with her extensive history, this is easily negotiated down to just a little community service... if she bothered to show up in court... but, apparently, ditching court was her regular thing with all of her various arrests.
    1
  2082. This.her didn't anything do on internet about family this this who for her being put
    1
  2083. Well, the video was real, but, yes, somewhat "staged" in how it was presented. She killed herself almost 2 years ago. But, the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. So, with an opportunity to falsely create a viral video, they cleverly played some word games, asking questions instead of providing answers, and never mentioned that she had already been dead a long time. Then, they came out with these "update" videos that say she's dead, letting the audience believe that she was shamed to death over the release of the arrest video. In reality, nobody in the public ever saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  2084. Doubtful they had a choice but to release the video. It was probably a legal FOIA request. But, at least they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. The saving grace (as minor as it is) is that the poor woman didn't have to suffer any embarrassment from the release of the arrest video.
    1
  2085. Just letting you know, your hatred is showing. See, dewdrop, the thing is, it wouldn't have mattered what she said or didn't say, she was going to get arrested either way. One of the "audience" recorded the incident on video, and showed it to the police. It is described in the arrest report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. I'm sorry if this doesn't match the version told by the woman who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, but, yeah, that happens. I think I'll stick with the version of the story told by innocent bystanders with a video camera, vs. the version told by a convicted felon who served prison time for stealing cars, and who had a mile long arrest record for various other things, and open warrants for arrest.
    1
  2086. Really? They don't arrest people for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2087. So, in your mind, cops should never make an arrest, because the person getting arrested might kill him/herself? And, huh? This woman WAS a criminal who was let out to offend again. She served felony time in prison for stealing cars. She got out. She went right back to crime, had a million arrests and judgements against her, including additional thefts. Oh, and by the way, this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  2088. Which media and on what basis?
    1
  2089. Well, I think it's rather easy to prove that this arrest video didn't cause her suicide. Nobody saw it while she was still alive. Also, she didn't commit suicide during her prison term, and didn't commit suicide from her million other arrests. It would be absurd to think she'd choose this minor arrest as the one to cause her to kill herself, especially given that she didn't kill herself until 9 months later.
    1
  2090. On what charge?
    1
  2091. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them caught in on video, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video differs from the version she's telling as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest. The witnesses said she deliberately chose a spot in front of people. The video shows a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. I mean, you do know that she was a convicted felon who served time in prison and had a million arrests before this, right? You do know that her landlord said she was a stripper, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men, right? So, let's face reality here, this woman had no idea what shame was. And, given that the arrest video and the viral coverage didn't come out until long after she was dead, she really didn't suffer much embarrassment while she was alive. But, hey, you keep on pretending you know things you don't. You're pretty good at it. How about heading over to a brain surgery video and tell the doctor he should be ashamed of himself for the procedure he uses?
    1
  2092.  @blackops844  Huh? What does that mean?
    1
  2093.  @MotoMechMikey  Yes, but it only had a couple hundred hits, and didn't include the video.
    1
  2094. Wrong. It wasn't made public until she was already dead 1.5 years. Her suicide had nothing whatsoever to do with this arrest video.
    1
  2095. Probably a Freedom of Information Act request.
    1
  2096.  @sub2me543  Wrong. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023.
    1
  2097.  @sub2me543  Nope. Not even close. It was held private because it was an open investigation. Not even a legal FOIA request could release it. Yet, you're saying the bodycam was made public the very same day as the arrest? Um, no. It was released to the public on 11/24/2023.
    1
  2098. Multiple callers complained about this incident. One of the "audience" caught it on video and gave it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around. To the contrary, the witnesses said it was intentional, and the video showed a loud act in front of people including children.
    1
  2099. It's very doubtful that this arrest had anything to do with her suicide. Her family doesn't think it did, because they just attribute it to her overall decision to exit normal society and live a life of drugs and crime instead, and she had extreme alcohol issues.
    1
  2100. Her neighbors and landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club, and that she did "private" cash transactions out of her apartment also.
    1
  2101. And, I'd imagine that her poor choices in life just stacked up, and she couldn't deal with it any longer. If this arrest had something to do with it, it was probably just another thing to throw on the pile of things.
    1
  2102. Even with her history, it's likely that this would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction anyway. So, I disagree with the notion that she would have ended up on any "lists."
    1
  2103. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison about 6 years ago. And, she's had a million other arrests. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failing to appear in court. You name it.
    1
  2104. I'm wrong? Why? Because you fell for a deceptive Inside Edition video, and you prefer the fake story instead of the real one?
    1
  2105. Naw, even with her extensive criminal record, this would easily be negotiated down to a minor infraction, no lists. But, she didn't show up at court to even have that negotiation. As for ending her career, she did that all by herself more than a decade ago when she abandoned her family and career to live a life of drugs and crime. She did a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. Stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear, the list goes on. After that, you're correct, it's tough to get a straight job, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. I don't think this arrest affects that job in a negative way. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  2106. Yeah, they wanted to time it that way to make it look like the arrest led to the suicide. So, a few weeks ago, they showed the arrest video. Then, they waited a couple of weeks, then showed that she committed suicide. The reality is that the suicide happened over 1.5 years ago. But, hey, that doesn't make a viral video, so, they leave that little detail out of their reporting.
    1
  2107. Well, nobody put anything on social media about this until she was already dead for 1.5 years. So, I fail to understand your point.
    1
  2108. She's wearing a cross. Didn't help. She was still a criminal.
    1
  2109. Huh? The police didn't publicize anything. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was already dead 1.5 of those years before anybody saw the video. And, eventually, with the case closed that long, the police couldn't block a legal FOIA request, and had to release it.
    1
  2110. No, that's just the picture Inside Edition is falsely painting.
    1
  2111. How? What did they do wrong? And, how did it cause her suicide?
    1
  2112. You think they give warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2113. Huh? No news even covered this until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  2114. Update: the people making that claim have no idea what they're talking about.
    1
  2115. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2116. My hamster.
    1
  2117. YouTube never lets me post replies on this topic. I tried here, and it's blocked. But, in brief, the issue is that you don't know the difference between a crime and an infraction.
    1
  2118. First of all, multiple people called the police, and one of the witnesses recorded it and gave the video to the police. So, it wouldn't matter if she talked to police or not. The video shows a very different version than the innocent one she's pretending. Secondly, you do know that the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023, right? You do know she's been dead for two years, right? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  2119. We have empowered police to use discretion for an infraction (speeding, parking illegally, fishing without a license, etc.). We do not want police to have that level of discretion for a misdemeanor crime, and we want them to make the arrest and let the courts take it from there. There is no such thing as a warning for this crime.
    1
  2120. Initial video? When was that? It's very difficult to tell what people mean.
    1
  2121. In your country, it might be different. But, in the USA, cuffing is part of every single arrest. It's for everyone's safety.
    1
  2122. Yes, she needed lots of help in life. She was an absolute train wreck. But, it's very difficult to get people help when they don't show up for their court dates.
    1
  2123. She was dead, there wasn't a requirement to blur the face.
    1
  2124. WHO should be accountable, and FOR WHAT?
    1
  2125. She was committing a crime. She's going to get arrested.
    1
  2126. It won't post my response. But, guess what? The police video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. Sorry if you believe nonsense you see on Inside Edition.
    1
  2127. Yes, this is EXACTLY the result of the Freedom of Information Act. Stop pretending to know things you don't.
    1
  2128. Yes, the result was that the video is now online. Why is this so difficult for you? Just checking, also, you do know she was dead 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video, right?
    1
  2129. Yes, and men will get arrested also.
    1
  2130. Huh? So, cops shouldn't arrest criminals, because it might cause them misery?
    1
  2131. What does that have to do with your suit? You're the legal expert here, not me, so, please explain the suit you propose.
    1
  2132. Yes. It's a suicide. And, it had nothing to do with this incident. Stop pretending you know things you don't.
    1
  2133. So, you're just going to change topics?
    1
  2134. Well, this didn't make any "news" until long after she was dead. This arrest was mentioned in a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, then nothing until the arrest video was released 2.5 years later due to FOIA request, and that's when it went viral. She was never alive to see that happen. And, as for family and friends, about the only thing I can do is ask what family or friends would those be? She walked out on her family more than a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. Her husband and son didn't even go to her funeral. As for friends, nobody was even looking for her. She was in her apartment for an unknown period of time until the landlord went in looking for the overdue rent.
    1
  2135. As a general rule (not absolute, but, general), they blur for open investigations and don't for closed ones.
    1
  2136. And, what happens to your suit when they point out that they blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, and nobody saw it while she was alive? Or, how about when they point out that they only released it as a result of a FOIA request, and had no choice? Then what?
    1
  2137. Well, I'm not them, but, if I was, I'd be pretty indifferent. I mean, I don't want to see anybody die. But, I wouldn't take blame for calling the police while witnessing a crime.
    1
  2138. So, you think that putting on a show at a public beach in front of people including children is legal?
    1
  2139. And, you think she thought she was alone, why? Because she said that to the police as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2140. Who didn't leave her a choice? And, what does that even mean? Why wouldn't she have a choice?
    1
  2141. Huh? She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison and had a million other arrests. If that's not a "real criminal," what is?
    1
  2142. OK, for what?
    1
  2143. Huh? The police department managed to keep the video out of public view for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she died. At that point, they can no longer block legal FOIA requests, because the case had been closed for too long.
    1
  2144. No.
    1
  2145. What would you propose they should have done differently?
    1
  2146. Can you name any media that even covered this story while she was still alive? You think a couple hundred hits on a blog nobody has ever heard of somehow = "global shame"?
    1
  2147. Dewdrop, here's the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to Freedom of Information Act. Only after that did any of this go viral. She was never alive when anybody saw the arrest video, or this incident got all of the press. So, what "shame" do you think she suffered here? And, why this arrest? Why no shame from her felonies or term spent in a Florida prison, or her million other arrests?
    1
  2148. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club. Her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. Did it ever occur to you that Inside Edition is the problem for painting a false picture, and maybe, just maybe, she was making "public beach" content, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Do you even know that the police have video of the incident itself, and it doesn't match her sob story?
    1
  2149. You saw it AFTER she was long dead.
    1
  2150. Yet, you cannot name what they did that's wrong? Oh, you're a real genius alright.
    1
  2151. As opposed to someone else? Is there any particular reason you don't want criminals to get arrested?
    1
  2152. Huh? A couple of hundred hits on a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of? Nothing "spread" until well after her death.
    1
  2153. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, um no. And, how would you propose stopping the release from a legal FOIA request?
    1
  2154. But, nobody showed this to the public until long after she was dead.
    1
  2155. Well, had she shown up for her court date, it's probable that they'd have negotiated exactly that. But, it seems from the number of her open warrants for failure to appear in court, it seems that refusing to show up for her court dates was the normal way she dealt with getting arrested all the time.
    1
  2156. On what grounds exactly?
    1
  2157. No, she killed herself. The police had nothing to do with it. The mechanism that the arrest videos go public is called The Freedom of Information Act. If there's a legal FOIA request, the police have no choice but to release the video. But, if there's an ongoing investigation, they don't have to release it until the investigation is closed for long enough. And, that's what happened here. The police managed to keep this video private for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it until 1.5 years after she was already dead. At that point, they can no longer block legal FOIA requests.
    1
  2158. But, contrary to Inside Edition's story (where facts don't matter), she wasn't embarrassed. This story got virtually zero attention while she was alive, outside of a couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of. The real publicity never came until long after she died.
    1
  2159. If the creeps were just watching, yeah, there's not enough evidence for an arrest. If the creeps start cranking in front of the kids, yes, they'll get arrested every time.
    1
  2160. It was released because the incident was 2.5 years ago, she was already dead 1.5 years, and they could no longer block legal FOIA requests after the case was closed that long. As for "avoidable," how?
    1
  2161. A) All arrests include cuffing. B) She should have been pretty darned used to it by then. With the number of times she's been arrested, I wouldn't be surprised if they had those pink cuffs with her name on them.
    1
  2162. Really? A warning for a misdemeanor? And, what difference would it make anyway? With all of those open warrants, she was getting arrested no matter what.
    1
  2163. Huh? What exactly would you have proposed they do differently?
    1
  2164. I am married, and also sad for her. But, unlike 95% of the commenters here, I hold her accountable for her own actions, rather than blaming others.
    1
  2165. I don't know if that existed back then. But, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment, my money is on the notion that, yes, she was doing what she was doing in order to make content for that sort of thing.
    1
  2166. So, that's how this goes, in your mind? Your "x" was a cop, therefore you think you understand things you do not?
    1
  2167. Is there ever a point that you will stop pretending to know things you don't? Multiple people called about this. One even caught it on video, and showed it to the police (it doesn't match her story about nobody being around, quite to the contrary). And, with her mile long arrest record and time she spent in prison, and her numerous open warrants, did you really think she wasn't getting arrested? Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with lots of men. The witnesses of this incident told the police that she did it intentionally. Yet, you're going to keep pretending to know things you don't?
    1
  2168. TRANSLATION: "I'm passing judgement on something I know nothing about. And, you obviously know more than I do, so, you shouldn't pass judgment. My position of passing judgement without understanding the topic is superior to understanding the topic."
    1
  2169. Um, ok, what was unnecessary? Her crime? Or, something else?
    1
  2170. Inside Edition says so, right? Or, well, they ask "was she shamed?" They never actually answered. (Hint: the answer is no.)
    1
  2171. Well, I'd imagine they'd probably blur the face if she was still alive. But, since she was dead, the investigation was closed, and there's no requirement to blur.
    1
  2172. Well, first of all, this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide. Secondly, the cops didn't allow the arrest video to be released until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  2173. Blame the victim? What's wrong with you?
    1
  2174. Based on WHAT? Why would you say such a ridiculous thing?
    1
  2175. Imagine being a clueless YouTube commenter who believes every bit of fake news he can gobble up. The video wasn't seen by anybody until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2176. Huh? The case was long over by then. She was never convicted for the incident in this video. I fail to understand your point here. What do you mean?
    1
  2177. Her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest.
    1
  2178. Yes, if you see a man cranking it at the playground in front of kids, do nothing, unless you're paid to do it. Leave him ALONE!!!! LET HIM WATCH YOUR KIDS AT THE PLAYGROUND, but, DO NOT CALL THE POLICE!!! That might upset him.
    1
  2179.  @harleyquinn5774  And, you'd believe that, why? Because that's what she claims while she's attempting to dodge her millionth arrest? You've never heard criminals say, "I didn't do it" before?
    1
  2180. But, the bodycam video never went public when she was alive. It wasn't released until 2.5 years after the arrest, after she had long been dead.
    1
  2181. You believe that, why? Because you saw it on Inside Edition?
    1
  2182. Huh? Wrong of the cops? For arresting a criminal?
    1
  2183. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  2184. So, you asked questions, but didn't wait for answers, before you came to your conclusions. How amazingly honest of you! Dewdrop, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police don't dictate the rules about releasing the videos, the law does. The police can and do block the release for an investigation that is open. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023, arrest video released. Do the math before holing people accountable on the basis of your own ignorance of the facts.
    1
  2185. A misdemeanor is not the same as a traffic infraction. They can't just decide for themselves to give a break or not. They either have probable cause, or they don't. In this case, they did. Nobody embarrassed her besides herself. Is "accountability" not part of your vocabulary? The arrest video was released because that's what the Freedom of Information Act requires. But, they blocked its release for 2.5 years. Once an investigation is closed long enough, they can no longer block it. Nobody saw it while she was alive. At least the video of the incident itself remains blocked. With her extensive criminal history, what did you think was going to happen? She put on a show in public in front of children. I mean, you don't believe the convicted felon's sob story while she's trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, do you?
    1
  2186. No mainstream media even covered it until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2187. Sorry, but you're not a criminal detective, and shouldn't pretend to be one.
    1
  2188. How do you ruin someone's life who is dead already? I mean, I'm not fond of this story either. But, at least I'm aware that the news didn't cover anything at all until well after she was dead.
    1
  2189. Which family? The one she abandoned a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime? Or, the family that she chose to put on a show in front of at the public beach?
    1
  2190. The only force that destroyed her was HERSELF.
    1
  2191. Hey, i just flagged you for spam.
    1
  2192. I hope you read the YouTube terms of service.
    1
  2193. Mentioning police is correction. Wanna be called listening? Who is the sometimes?
    1
  2194. Why ask a question if you intend to ignore the correct answer?
    1
  2195. See that camera in the middle of the cop's belly/chest area? The other cop has one too. That's normal now. But, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then. As for protecting her identity, well, I would agree in principle, but, the Freedom of Information Act doesn't agree.
    1
  2196. Huh? Doubtful anybody around her even knew about it. The arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Sorry if Inside Edition conveniently left that little detail out of their story. Gotta make viral videos after all.
    1
  2197. Um, well, ok, the Freedom of Information Act applies to all of us. So what? At least nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  2198. Well, indeed, you're correct not to believe a word out of Inside Edition. I mean, yes, the poor woman is dead. But, this story is massively skewed to the point that you can basically reject it entirely.
    1
  2199. So, basically, you want to repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  2200. Who? Why?
    1
  2201. Huh? Who is "they"? And, what filming? The video taken by the "audience" of the incident itself (which still has never been released, due to graphic content), or the arrest video?
    1
  2202. Wait, huh? You're complaining about the chest camera?
    1
  2203. And, huh? Swimwear embarrasses her? Then why was she a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club? She wore a heck of a lot less than that!!!
    1
  2204. And, you do know that nobody saw the arrest video until 2.5 years later, right? You do know she was already dead for 1.5 of those years, right? So, how did this embarrass her?
    1
  2205. You make no sense whatsoever. How can she be "embarrassed" by a video that nobody saw until long after she was dead? And, why this arrest? She had been arrested a million times before, and even did a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. What's so special about THIS arrest to you?
    1
  2206. This incident = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    1
  2207. Huh? So, basically, you think cops shouldn't have body-cams? Huh?
    1
  2208. It wasn't released due to content. The only video they released was this arrest video.
    1
  2209. Do you say the same about a man on a playground bench? Couldn't those families just take their children to some other playground and let the guy do his thing?
    1
  2210. Yeah, you probably don't. You're Inside Edition's target market, after all.
    1
  2211. I'm sorry you don't understand. I guess you must have a bunch of other issues that go a lot deeper than understanding this.
    1
  2212. No. The video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead. Sorry if Inside Edition skipped that fact. Gotta make viral videos, ya know, not accurate ones.
    1
  2213. The arrest video was released and first posted on November 24, 2023. Freedom of Information Act. What EXACTLY do you think should have been done differently?
    1
  2214. Except multiple people called the police about this incident, and one woman even video recorded it with her cell phone. Pretty difficult to claim it was a little discreet act outside public view with a shake weight, when they have video showing otherwise.
    1
  2215. Yeah, I agree. The only saving grace (which is minor) is that she didn't suffer any humiliation over the release of this video. It wasn't released to the public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2216. So, you don't know who, why, or when, but, you've determined that you know what's wrong?
    1
  2217. On a public beach in front of children? C'mon.
    1
  2218. Just checking, if you were at a playground with your kids, and a man came up and started doing, ya know, would you be saying the same thing?
    1
  2219. She was arrested because she committed an aggravated misdemeanor. So, quit with the "unnecessarily" nonsense. And, if she didn't like being arrested, maybe she should have thought of that before ditching her career and family to lead a life of crime and drugs instead.
    1
  2220. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Sorry, but no. She experienced zero shame from this arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  2221. They're called police bodycams. And, it wasn't let out until she was already dead 1.5 years (2.5 years after the arrest). Freedom of Information Act requests cannot be blocked once a case is closed for that long.
    1
  2222. She killed herself. They don't give warnings for aggravated misdemeanors. They always wear bodycams. Freedom of Information Act. But, nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  2223. Well, that's correct. But, just FYI, she experienced nearly zero public "shame" from this incident. None of the big media covered it until long after she was dead.
    1
  2224. Well, this charge was just another to add to the pile. I don't know why she'd take her own life over this charge, as opposed to the million other arrests on her record, or her felony prison term. I think the suicide was completely unrelated.
    1
  2225. "lost her job" - Huh? Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club.
    1
  2226. "embarrassed on national television" - Huh? Nothing was on television until after she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2227. "give warning" - Again, for an aggravated misdemeanor? And, what about her outstanding warrants for her other million arrests? You think they should just let her go?
    1
  2228. "the arrest should not have happened" - Why not? She put on a show in front of children at a public beach. An aggravated misdemeanor.
    1
  2229. "whos going to see this" - Hilarious!! I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content with the INTENT that people see it.
    1
  2230. "friends, family" - Oh, the family she abandoned more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of drugs and crime? The family she had no contact with? And, what friends? After she died, nobody was even looking for her. It wasn't until the landlord went in to look for overdue rent that her body was found.
    1
  2231. "she was in real-estate" - Yeah, more than a decade ago. But, then she turned to a life of drugs and crime. Kinda hard to be a real estate agent with a mile long arrest record and a felony prison term.
    1
  2232. "this could of definitely been handled differently" - Of it? What of could of done of differently of? Of how of you of handled of it instead of of?
    1
  2233. How of about you of stop of blaming of victims, and start of blaming of the actual of criminals and hold of them accountable of for their own actions of of?
    1
  2234. "they could of written a ticket" - Of they? Of ticket?
    1
  2235. Huh? What exactly do you believe the cops did wrong?
    1
  2236. No. No news even covered this until 1.5 years after she was dead. Nothing went viral until the arrest video was released. The only coverage this story got while she was alive was a couple of obscure blog posts.
    1
  2237. Well, then let me explain what really happened here. This story is so heavily edited and modified from the truth that it's ridiculous. Let's first start with the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. These channels wanted to get two viral rounds for the price of one. So, they released the story in November and December, but, didn't mention that she was already long dead. Then, they waited a few weeks and re-released the story with the "update" that she died, letting people believe that the first round caused the suicide. And, of course, the story itself is massively inaccurate. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long. And, one of the audience recorded the beach incident and gave a copy to the police. It doesn't match her version about nobody being around.
    1
  2238. She abandoned her family, including a 6 month old son (and another son) about a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. She's had a million arrests before and after that term. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. You name it. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment with bunches of men. What a professional and respectable woman!!!
    1
  2239. But, social media didn't get involved until she was already dead for 1.5 years. She didn't suffer any media hounding, because she was long dead. And, "innocent"? Huh? How is she innocent? One of the "audience" even got it on video. And, with this woman's mile long arrest and felony prison record, I'd hardly call her "innocent" of anything.
    1
  2240. Were you under the impression that your sentence was coherent?
    1
  2241. How do you? Seems they did the correct thing, and you're doing the wrong thing by accusing them of something.
    1
  2242. Learn the difference between an infraction and a crime. Sorry if YouTube University never taught you that while you were getting your degree.
    1
  2243. Spare the world your jokes at the expense of the deceased. Already, she's had her name publicized in death. And, you have to make it worse? You don't get tickets for crimes. You get tickets for infractions.
    1
  2244. But, dewdrop, she never suffered any such shame or disgrace. The cops kept her arrest video private for 2.5 years. But, eventually, you can no longer block FOIA requests if the case was closed. But, they still managed to prevent the release of her arrest video until 1.5 years after she died. Sorry, did Inside Edition not give you that detail? Just going to gobble up the garbage anyway?
    1
  2245. Yes, she killed herself more than 2 years ago.
    1
  2246. Except that's just plain wrong. She was last known to be alive 3/19/22, and she was found on 3/31/22. This "struggle" happened a month prior. And, yes, sometimes people live through gunshot wounds to the head. She was one of them, and managed to stumble around until she finally bled out.
    1
  2247. Oh? What was the correct course of action instead?
    1
  2248. So, multiple people called the police. One of the audience even recorded it, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version of "nobody was around" (the claim she was trying to make when she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and she didn't want to get sent back to prison again). To the contrary, the video showed a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. And, your position is, "never mind, we're not going to do anything"?
    1
  2249. Huh? You believe any of this was on YouTube before she died?
    1
  2250. No, it wasn't. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  2251. Huh? Why? What do they have to do with her suicide?
    1
  2252.  @aaad3552  As I said in the other thread, you should just try to write in your native language, and maybe I can translate. I appreciate that you try to write in English. But, nothing you write actually means anything.
    1
  2253. Huh? Other than the Smoking Gun article, none of this stuff was public until 1.5 years after she died. The arrest video wasn't made public until November of 2023 (probably from a FOIA request). Her suicide was in March of 2022.
    1
  2254. What exactly do you think the police did wrong? And, it's doubtful that she wanted to take the 5th anyway, nor that it would have mattered. One of the "audience" recorded the incident and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around. And, with her arrest history (and the fact that she served time in prison), I would think she knew not to talk to the police. But, she probably figured that she might whine her way out of an arrest before they ran her name and found out about her open warrants. If she remained silent, there would be no way to avoid them looking her up.
    1
  2255. Spare the world, seriously. That's ridiculous for a million reasons, and you know it.
    1
  2256. Well, it sounds like she suffered a lot in life. But, I don't understand how this arrest was any different to her than the mile long list of other stuff she did, arrests, judgments against her for various theft, failures to appear in court, alcohol and drug problems, prison term for stealing cars, and everything else. And, since the arrest video wasn't made public until she was dead for 1.5 years, she really didn't suffer from that either.
    1
  2257. But nobody saw the arrest video until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2258. Welcome to trash news.
    1
  2259. You're clearly the expert here, not me, so, can you please explain to me when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2260. Embarrassed enough not to do it again? Huh? She was a convicted felon who served time in a Florida prison. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drug and alcohol charges. Failures to appear. You name it. Yet, she had an arrest record a mile long for plenty of repeat offenses. Oh, but you thought she'd learn THIS TIME to quit committing crimes?
    1
  2261. Come on, do you really not understand bodycams?
    1
  2262. It's pretty doubtful that "shame" was even in her vocabulary. Even after she got out of prison close to a decade ago, she continued her drug and crime spree. And, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, according to her neighbors, she also did "private" sessions for cash in her apartment. I doubt "shame" was a term she even understood.
    1
  2263. Came should be cops investigating scenes of be.
    1
  2264. Just checking here... you do know that the video wasn't posted anywhere until long after she died, right?
    1
  2265. Than your initial sentence in your initial posting is incorrect.
    1
  2266. How did you determine this? Because you saw a minute long video? Just a few tidbits to add to the stuff Inside Edition fails to mention.... About a decade ago, she abandoned her career in real estate and her family including a husband and two boys (one of whom was 6 months old) to live a life of drugs and crime. She spent some felony time in prison for stealing cars. She had multiple judgements against her for other thefts. She had an arrest record a mile long for various drug and alcohol charges. Her method of dealing with all of that seemed to be to just fail to appear in court, and the open charges and open arrest warrants just kept growing. She tried changing her name a few times to evade the police. After all of that, it must have been difficult to get a straight job. So, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Interviews with other people who knew her said that she was also, ya know, one of those strippers who also does "private" services for cash. Witnesses of this beach incident said that it appeared that she willfully chose a spot in view of others. One of the audience caught it on video, and showed it to the police. The version they describe doesn't match this innocent soccer mom caught when nobody was around version. I mean, to each their own. You're welcome to say she was a keeper, in your mind. But, thanks, I'll pass.
    1
  2267. "Would of" isn't a verb. And, sorry, but you don't know the difference between an infraction and a crime. And, you know even less about what happened in this case.
    1
  2268. Yeah. Go up to someone in the middle of a loud public show and have a conversation. Sure.
    1
  2269. Another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law, huh? This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Freedom of Information Act. And, sorry, you don't get a warning for a crime, you're thinking of an infraction.
    1
  2270. Huh? What in the world are you talking about? The video of the arrest wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive. And, it was only released because the Freedom of Information Act requires it, and the case was closed a long time. And, the video of the actual "event" was never released due to graphic content.
    1
  2271. What news covered it before she died?
    1
  2272. Multiple people called about the incident. But, only one video was reported to the police, not multiple. You can read the police report. It's a bit of a moot point, because one video, or multiple, it doesn't change the fact that she was getting arrested. But, this incident would likely have been negotiated down to a minor infraction, had she bothered to show up in court. Yes, she was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests and judgements.
    1
  2273.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  There were two callers. One video. And, yes, this sort of thing is easily negotiated down if she had cooperated and appeared in court.
    1
  2274.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  Nope. You can post that until the cows come home, but, it's not reality.
    1
  2275. OK, on what basis?
    1
  2276. Well, had she shown up for court, this would likely have been negotiated down to a minor infraction, no registering on any lists. But, of course, it seems that she never shows up in court after being arrested, what with her piles of open warrants over the years, felony term in prison, and a million other arrests.
    1
  2277. Well, perhaps if she had bothered to show up in court, they could have mandated that help you're talking about. But, of course, she didn't.
    1
  2278. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = arrest video was released, probably as a result of a FOIA request. This video didn't cost anybody their lives. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  2279. Open investigation vs. closed investigation.
    1
  2280. Doubtful. They probably know that this Inside Edition story is as far from accurate as you can possibly get.
    1
  2281. Um, no. The way it works is that bodycam footage is withheld while there's an open investigation. After a case is over for long enough, they can no longer block a legal FOIA request. This arrest was 2.5 years ago. She's been dead 1.5 years. The police released the bodycam footage about a month ago.
    1
  2282. They give warnings for crimes now? I thought that was only for infractions. With your obvious legal prowess, please explain...?
    1
  2283. The media didn't cause it either. Virtually zero media covered it while she was alive.
    1
  2284. Well, they never published anything while she was alive, so, they're doubling down while she's dead.
    1
  2285. Well, she didn't have a good job. Her career in real estate was long over, and she hadn't sold a house in years. And, with a felony prison term under her belt for stealing cars, it's pretty tough to get a nice job after that. And, yeah, she had been arrested enough times to know to smile for the camera, so it doesn't look like a mugshot.
    1
  2286. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023 from a legal Freedom of Information Act request.
    1
  2287. Amazing that nobody seems to think she pushed HERSELF into her own situation. It's always someone else's fault. Zero accountability.
    1
  2288. Dewdrop, how does any of that relate to this particular case? You accused the police of murder. How?
    1
  2289. But, there was no public shame. Inside Edition asks the question about whether she was shamed. But, they [intentionally] don't give the answer. The police didn't release the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  2290. Well, don't worry, it had nothing to do with it. This is Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  2291. Wrong. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after her death. Sorry if you fall for Inside Edition's clever wording and little one-line out-of-context quotes, and their reporting of the "news" by asking questions without providing the answers. But, look it up yourself if you don't believe me. Arrest = July 2021 Suicide = March 2022 Public release of arrest video = November 2023
    1
  2292. But, the "embarrassment" had nothing to do with it. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2293. Inside Edition never covered anything about this story until long AFTER she was dead.
    1
  2294. Because she DID do it to herself. Her life was already in shambles. And, the police did everything they could to stop the arrest video from going public. They kept it private for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she died. But, eventually, Freedom of Information Act requests cannot be denied if the case is closed long enough. So, how did they ruin her life? What EXACTLY would you do differently?
    1
  2295. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  2296. Should we call the suicide prevention hotline for you?
    1
  2297. Well, maybe she shouldn't have decided to put on a show at the public beach.
    1
  2298. They did. They took her aside so nobody could see and hear what was going on. And, they kept the arrest video private until after she was dead for 1.5 years. What more do you want? And, sorry, but she willfully put on a show in front of people including children. She doesn't get to play the "shame" card. Especially because her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. And, if she didn't learn any shame from her felony term in prison, and her other million arrests, she wasn't going to be shamed here either.
    1
  2299. Police? What do you think they did wrong?
    1
  2300. Really? How? By arresting her?
    1
  2301.  @grezdaed  "Innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" goes viral. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested yet again, and commits suicide a year later due to unrelated causes" doesn't go viral.
    1
  2302. Learn the difference between infractions and crimes. And, no, it didn't lead to her suicide, despite that Inside Edition is trying to paint that false narrative just so videos go viral.
    1
  2303. When you see a guy cranking it at a playground in front of kids, just mind your own business, and don't report him.
    1
  2304. The media didn't cover it until long after she was dead, dewdrop.
    1
  2305. Huh? Which media?
    1
  2306. Huh? It would be negligent for them NOT to release the video if they get a legal Freedom of Information Act request. I mean, the police blocked the video's release for 2.5 years. The woman was dead for 1.5 years before they finally released it. What more do you want? What's the exact basis of your suit?
    1
  2307. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then. I fail to understand this suit of yours?
    1
  2308. Huh? You knew what? At what time?
    1
  2309. And, you'd believe she hurt herself over this, why? Because Inside Edition (trash news) told you?
    1
  2310. I believe it's the boyfriend of the landlord.
    1
  2311. Multiple people called the police. Nobody was anonymous. I won't post their names, but, they're readily available. One witness even managed to record it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match her version of being a quiet discreet act with nobody around. Quite to the contrary. She was getting arrested whether she said anything or not.
    1
  2312. First of all, it seems that you don't know the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. This story got almost zero coverage while she was alive.
    1
  2313. Secondly, it seems that you know nothing about this woman's history. She abandoned her career and family a decade ago, including a husband and 6 month old boy, because she wanted to live a life of crime and drugs. She served a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. She's been arrested a million times, and has had multiple convictions and judgements. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drug charges. Alcohol. Failure to appear, etc. It's not easy to get a straight job after all of that, so, her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with a parade of various men.
    1
  2314. Third, multiple people called for this incident, not just the one family. Witnesses say it was an intentional act. One of them even managed to get the last few minutes on video, and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about nobody being around. It was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children.
    1
  2315. Now, it's up to you if you want to believe she thought she was alone. But, I'd trust innocent bystanders who were able to take video, and the police, before I'd trust this convicted felon. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but, got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  2316. Good gods, how is that a reply to anything I said?
    1
  2317. The video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she committed suicide. She suffered no such public embarrassment.
    1
  2318. Huh? There was nothing to "pass over." Virtually nobody even knew about this arrest until long after she died.
    1
  2319. Exactly!! A blog entry on an obscure site that virtually nobody has heard of, that got a couple hundred hits worldwide.
    1
  2320. Besides, you got your wish anyway. She lived for another 8 or 9 months after the arrest.
    1
  2321. Man goes to a playground and does the same thing in view of kids, "lock him up and throw away the key." Woman goes to a beach and does this in view of kids, "Omg the poor woman. My heart hurts for her."
    1
  2322. Well, her arrest wasn't plastered on the net until she was already dead for 1.5 years. The police kept the arrest video private until the case was closed long enough (2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death). And, sorry if you blindly believe the words you hear from a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long, but, yeah, the video of the incident didn't match her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. Multiple people called the police. One witness said that she wandered up and down the beach and intentionally plopped down in view of a family and others. The police saw the video of the woman, and described it in their arrest report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. I have no idea why you blindly accept the words of a drug addled woman trying to avoid her 1 millionth arrest, but, that's exactly what you've done. According to her landlord, she was a stripper who puts on these kids of shows every day. I guess she forgot she wasn't at the club, and was out on a public beach, huh? Anyway, why? Why in the world would you believe a single word out of this woman? Years prior, she served a felony prison term for stealing cars, and has been in and out of jail and the courts ever since, for various crimes, drug and alcohol problems, you name it. I'm fully aware that you don't know any of this. But, (a) yeah, you're one of those people who trusts Inside Edition (sigh), and (b) if you can't understand the analogy to a guy at a playground, that's all the more evidence that you can't think straight.
    1
  2323. I don't know what that even means (and neither do you). Look, dewdrop, just watch your Inside Edition, swallow up every fake story they put forth, and pretend that your heart hurts. That's fine.
    1
  2324. Well, I certainly don't get it by watching Inside Edition, which is where you obviously get your info from. I get the information from the medical examiner's report, the police reports, her arrest and prison history, from Freedom of Information Act requests, etc. But, you just stay sleepy, ok? You're good at it. And, Inside Edition needs viewers like you.
    1
  2325. Oh, and dewdrop, links aren't allowed.
    1
  2326. How do you figure that?
    1
  2327. You never saw the arrest video before she died. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after that.
    1
  2328. That's a mighty powerful accusation from someone who knows absolutely nothing.
    1
  2329. Freedom of Information Act. But, you cannot shame a dead person. The bodycam footage wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2330. A) Nobody embarrassed this woman into committing suicide. This incident happened in July of 2021. She was arrested, but suffered no consequences, and wasn't convicted. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The video was released to the public in November of 2023, more than 1.5 years after her death. B) The "busybody" was a woman with her family on a public beach. The now deceased woman decided to plop down on the public beach in front of that family and go to town. The family recorded the incident with their cell phone, and showed the video to the police, who wrote about it in their police report. They described it as a loud and public display that went on for around 5 minutes, in full view of the family with children (the children were quickly escorted away, though)... hardly the "few seconds, and not thinking anybody could see her." Why do you think she was discreet? Because she said so while trying to avoid being arrested?
    1
  2331. Spare the world your accusations, and explain what "common sense" would ever result in police deactivating their cameras during an arrest?
    1
  2332. Multiple people called the police, not just one. And, one of the "audience" recorded the incident, and showed it to the police. The police report's description of the video doesn't match this woman's claim about being a little private thing with nobody around. And, yes, she was arrested.
    1
  2333. But, she had gone over the edge 1.5 years before Inside Edition or any other "news" outlet covered it. She was long dead by the time this went viral.
    1
  2334. Yes, I agree. I'm not in favor of releasing such videos. But, do you have a solution to solve the problem besides repealing the Freedom of Information Act? Anyway, at least the poor woman didn't suffer any humiliation from the arrest video, since nobody saw it until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2335. OK, and when Inside Edition replies to your suit with "Freedom of Information Act," then what?
    1
  2336. Huh? What do you think the police did wrong?
    1
  2337. Wow, you must have attended Harvard Law School, eh? They give warnings for crimes now, huh? I thought that warnings only applied to infractions, but not to crimes. I thought, for crimes, "probable cause" is what decides whether someone is arrested or not. But, hey, you're the legal eagle here, so, please explain?
    1
  2338. I asked you to explain when they started giving warnings for crimes. I thought warnings were only for infractions. And, you answered with that mess?
    1
  2339. Decent person? With her mile long arrest record and prison time for stealing cars, public drunkenness, judgements against her for various theft, changing her name over and over to try to avoid prosecution and being served notices, left her own family behind, including a 6 month old child, to go out and live the party life of drugs and alcohol, living on welfare and can't pay rent, and estranging her family so badly that nobody even knew she was missing after she committed suicide, and her own husband and son didn't attend her funeral? Decent person?
    1
  2340. Huh? The medical examiner's report said that the body weighed 86 pounds, and that her implants were jutting out from her emaciated body in such a way to emphasize how unhealthy she was. And, she apparently had no close friends or family, because her body sat there for so long without anybody checking on her, until finally her landlord did, because she hadn't paid rent. Turning her life around? What?
    1
  2341. Why do you believe she tried to be discreet? Because a video on Inside Edition showed you a few seconds of her claiming that? Why do you believe the words of a convicted felon who has a prison and arrest record a mile long, who is trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2342. Arrest = July 2021 Suicide = March 2022 Arrest video made public = November 2023 Do the math. One thing had nothing to do with the other. But, that story doesn't go viral. Twisting words, pretending, and asking questions instead of providing answers, is how a routine story about a drug addict committing suicide turns into a viral story about "did she kill herself over embarrassment?" Inside Edition knows the answer is "no," but, instead of giving you the answer, they just feed you the question, and let you believe that the question IS the answer.
    1
  2343. Freedom of Information Act. What do you do to stop it? But, at least it wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died. The poor woman didn't need to suffer any shame for the release of the video, because she was already dead.
    1
  2344. Bingo. But, it's never going to happen. They make a lot of money by misrepresenting stories and asking questions without giving the answers.
    1
  2345. Well, she's wearing a cross in this video. Or, was that the wrong god?
    1
  2346. To add to what you said, she was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She had a million arrests before and after. And, here's the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. (Nobody saw the video while she was alive.)
    1
  2347. Huh? The multiple callers? The video of the incident? Those things don't matter now?
    1
  2348. Just a piece of friendly advice: you might want to write this in your native language, and let the readers translate it to English. I'm not sure what you thought you were saying, but, whatever translator you used didn't work very well.
    1
  2349. Never blame the criminal for her own crimes. Nope. Blame the innocent bystanders and the police.
    1
  2350. Held responsible for what, exactly?
    1
  2351. OK, but, it didn't really "go public" until 2.5 years later. I mean, sure, the one obscure article on a website I've never heard of before, ok. But, the arrest video release and the following viral coverage didn't happen until long after she was dead.
    1
  2352. Well, being a convicted felon (did a prison term 6 years ago), with a million other arrests, she shouldn't have the firearm to begin with. But, that's another story entirely.
    1
  2353. I don't lack sympathy. But, I hold her accountable for her own actions.
    1
  2354. I think her biggest crime was walking out on her children (one was a 6 month old son) over a decade ago because she preferred a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  2355. Can you name any media that even published this story while she was alive?
    1
  2356. Dewdrop, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2357. Well, let's face reality here. Multiple people called this into the police. One woman even video recorded it with her cell phone. The police described that video in their police report, and it doesn't match the woman's version of a little private discreet thing with nobody around, which is what she says when trying to avoid getting arrested. They say it was a very loud and public display in full view of multiple people including children. Now, I can't really say, because I am nobody, and never knew her. But, my guess is that she WANTED to be seen.
    1
  2358. Bingo.
    1
  2359. With as often as she got arrested, maybe they got a special pair of cuffs just for her?
    1
  2360. OK, I won't argue with that. But, just out of curiosity, in your mind, what would it take to be an ugly soul? I mean, this woman had a felony conviction and served time in prison for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long for various offenses, drugs and alcohol, etc. A number of judgements against her for various thefts. Numerous failures to appear in court. Open arrest warrants. Etc. She attempted to change her name a few times to evade the police. She left her husband and two kids (one of them just 6 months old) in order to go live a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of drugs and crime instead. I'm pretty sure it's difficult to get a straight job after all of that. So, her landlord said that her job was as a stripper in a local club. And, internet rumors say that she also had "private" sessions for cash from numerous men. I mean, ok, none of that negates your "beautiful soul" comment. But, what does someone have to do to be an "ugly soul"?
    1
  2361. Why? What in the world do you think they did wrong?
    1
  2362. First of all, the arrest video wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. None of the big social media stuff you see about this woman ever happened when she was alive.
    1
  2363. Secondly, multiple people called the police. One of them even recorded the incident and showed the video to the police. Read the report yourself. It differs quite a bit from this notion of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around, the story portrayed by the woman attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  2364. And, I seriously doubt she even knew what shame was. A normal person would be ashamed of her prison record, arrest record, etc. But, she kept on committing crimes. I doubt shame was any part of it.
    1
  2365. How should it have been dealt with differently?
    1
  2366. I blame people for their own actions, instead of shifting blame to someone else.
    1
  2367. Another proud YouTube University Law School graduate, I see.
    1
  2368. Freedom of Information Act. However, the police can and do block the release if an investigation is open. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    1
  2369. If your plan was to be wrong in every single sentence you wrote... mission accomplished!!
    1
  2370. Multiple people called the police. One witness said the woman wandered up and down the beach, then plopped down in view of people and did this. One of the "audience" recorded it on video, and showed the video to the police. They describe the video in the police report (go read it yourself) as a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Why did you conclude that her version of the story (a discreet act with nobody around) was the correct version? Because she said so while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2371. What she did would be illegal in Europe also. Don't pretend otherwise.
    1
  2372. The police did everything correctly. There isn't a suit there. They took her away from view of the crowd to question her. They arrested her correctly. They blocked the public release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, after she was dead for 1.5 years, they could no longer block legal FOIA requests, and had to release the video. You weren't under the impression that anybody saw the arrest video while she was alive, were you?
    1
  2373. You're worried about her employability after getting arrested? So, when should people get arrested? Nobody can ever be arrested now? Would you say the same if it was a man at a playground? "Don't arrest him, it might affect his future!"?
    1
  2374. And, sorry, but, she long before had thrown her normal employment possibilities out the window. Almost a decade ago, she left her normal life behind, abandoned her family, and decided to live a "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words) life of crime and drugs. She did a felony prison term for stealing cars. She had multiple judgements against her for other various thefts. A mile long record of other arrests for drugs and alcohol, failures to appear in court (which she did also in this case), open arrest warrants, etc. Her legal situation was really piling up, so, she tried to change her name a few times to evade police. And, yeah, it's extremely difficult to get a straight job after all of that, so, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at a local club. She put on shows like this every day she worked at the club, but, this time, she chose to put on the show at a public beach.
    1
  2375. You complain that she shouldn't end up on the sex offender list. OK, but, dewdrop, it's extremely unlikely that she would have ended up on it anyway, if the picture was what you think it was. If she actually had been a suburban soccer mom and real estate agent, who was isolated on a beach and this was a discreet act that nobody could see, yeah, this would easily negotiate down to some minor infraction and she'd not end up on any list. You'd have gotten what you're asking for. But, instead, she never showed up to make any such negotiation. And, let's face reality here, she was not a mild mannered soccer mom. She was a convicted felon with a mile long record.
    1
  2376. "it's why the USA has more people incarcerated per capita than any other nation in the world." Absolutely positively incorrect. The prison population of soccer moms caught goofing around on a beach is NIL. We have the highest incarceration rate largely as a result of having the highest rates of illegal immigration of criminals, and the highest frequency of gangs, and a dismal high school graduation rate in large metropolitan cities.
    1
  2377. "There is a Youtube documentary on a woman who" .... Well, given your obvious propensity to swallow any garbage you see on YouTube (this video included), I hardly think you have much judgement about determining what's true or not. If I show you a YouTube documentary about Bigfoot, does that make it real?
    1
  2378. Most ironic nickname ever. You have sheepishly gobbled up every piece of gibberish fed to you, and regurgitated it. Not a single thing you wrote was correct. Not one. Bravo, you're a real hero.
    1
  2379. So, you're doubling down? You scoured the internet? How about simply reading her arrest reports and prison records? Good grief.
    1
  2380. Well, you can't exactly "humiliate" a dead person. But, yeah, I agree, it's pretty bad taste to blast it on the internet after she died.
    1
  2381. I think this version is far more honorable than the actual story. And, by the way, she didn't suffer much from this story. Other than a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, nobody covered this incident until long after she was dead.
    1
  2382. It's called a legal FOIA request. Freedom of Information Act. But, it doesn't get released if the case is still active. In this case, she was already dead 1.5 years before this arrest video was made public. Date of arrest = July 2021. Date of suicide = March 2022. Date of release of the video = November 2023. I mean, you don't believe claptrap you see online, do you?
    1
  2383. Huh? They arrested her for committing a misdemeanor crime. And, she had an arrest record a mile long with a history of failing to show up in court, with open warrants. What would you say the police should do differently?
    1
  2384. In general, they blur for open investigations, and don't blur for closed ones. Since she was long dead, no need to blur.
    1
  2385.  @trhansen3244  But, nothing you're saying is correct. The arrest video wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. Before then, she had a whopping ONE headline, very obscure, on a site I had never even heard of before. I mean, good grief, she got more press from her prior arrests for stealing cars and public drunkenness than she did for this beach incident.
    1
  2386. It received nearly zero social media traffic while she was alive. 99.99% of the viral stuff didn't happen until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023.
    1
  2387.  @Trina-rg7fi  That's not the point. It's not doing the world any good to have a deceptive story like this, painting an inaccurate picture of what happened. Most people in the comments blame the police for doing their jobs correctly, instead of holding people responsible for their own actions. THAT is what's wrong with this story.
    1
  2388. She gave up her good job a decade ago in order to live a life of drugs and crime. She served a felony term in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long. So, no more good jobs after that. According to her landlord, her job at the time of her death was as a stripper at the local club.
    1
  2389. But, the arrest video wasn't posted anywhere until 1.5 years after she died. So, um, no.
    1
  2390. Well, given that this arrest video and 99.9% of the news coverage didn't happen until long after she was dead, I reject your theory on face value alone. November 24, 2023 was when the arrest video was released and everything went viral. She died two years ago. And, as for embarrassment from being arrested, yeah, I don't think that was part of her vocabulary. She had an arrest record a mile long, and served time in prison for stealing cars. I'd think she was pretty used to getting arrested by this point. And, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at a local club. I doubt "shame" is part of her vocabulary either.
    1
  2391. My point was that your perception was inaccurate. And, trash news isn't helping anything by portraying her as an innocent soccer mom, when the reality was the opposite.
    1
  2392. Why would you believe such a thing? Because Inside Edition told you to think that, so you do? None of her other million arrests resulted in anything like this. But, this one did? And she waited a year?
    1
  2393. It WAS kept private. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Eventually, the police can no longer block Freedom of Information Act requests, once the case is closed long enough.
    1
  2394.  @lianasoares8052  Well, that will all start clearing up when you (a) read my replies, and (b) start to realize you cannot trust the words of a convicted felon trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  2395.  @teenanance8691  Dewdrop, I'm sorry you blindly believe Inside Edition, but, the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. Read the FOIA release yourself. She died in March of 2022.
    1
  2396. Well, she had a husband and two sons. But, she walked out on them more than a decade because she preferred a life of drugs and crime.
    1
  2397. I watched "Full Metal Jacket" yesterday. There's that scene when Hartman finds that the lock is open on one of the privates' footlockers. Hartman scolds the private for leaving the footlocker unlocked, and says, "if it wasn't for people like you, there wouldn't be any crime!" So, don't blame the criminal for stealing, blame the victim for not locking the lock. That's pretty similar to what you're saying here. Don't blame the criminal, blame the innocent bystanders for reporting the criminal.
    1
  2398. Well, we have this thing called a "society." Perhaps you might want to live in one someday.
    1
  2399. Yes, and the story is readily available (not on Inside Edition). Short version: she was a felon who had a million arrests and spent time in prison, turned stripper, and one of the audience had it on video. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until long after she died, so, no, it didn't cause her death.
    1
  2400. Huh? What EXACTLY is 100% the media's fault?
    1
  2401. Who is "they"?
    1
  2402. Huh? Everyone involved in what? Her arrest?
    1
  2403. Police can use discretion for an infraction, but, not for an aggravated misdemeanor. Any discretion is left for the courts, not the police on the street. And, sorry, but would you give mercy to a guy begging for it after being caught cranking in front of kids at the playground? No? You think the courts should deal with him, and not simply letting him go, allowing him to do it again tomorrow?
    1
  2404. There was virtually zero shaming, because there was nearly zero coverage of the story until long after she was dead. And, as for the incident, sorry, but the audience captured it on video and gave it to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this version about a quiet act with nobody around. Quite to the contrary.
    1
  2405. Yet, you can't name the better way? Just complain that there is one, without naming how?
    1
  2406. Dewdrop, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. And, no, it had nothing to do with her death, because nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later.
    1
  2407. Rampid. Good one. Is that like "rampant" plus "rabid" squeezed into one word?
    1
  2408. So, if a man goes to a playground, and begins cranking it in front of the kids, your solution is to arrest the parents of the kids?
    1
  2409. About this suit you propose... who, and on what basis? About a citation, um, huh? This was a misdemeanor. There's no such thing as a citation for that.
    1
  2410. Multiple people called the police for this incident. Witnesses said that the woman walked up and down the beach, and intentionally chose a spot in front of others. One witness even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match the discreet little act with nobody around, as the woman attempts to claim when she's trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and doesn't want to go back to prison again. Stop blaming the victims, good grief.
    1
  2411. Yeah, I'm sure if she was able to get over her mile long arrest record and prison time for doing things like stealing cars and public drunkenness, drug and alcohol abuse, and walking out on her family and two sons years prior, sure, this incident was nothing by comparison, and could surely get over it.
    1
  2412. In her arrest record, in internet articles, in interviews, etc.
    1
  2413. No, it's called personal accountability. We don't pass blame to others for the actions freely chosen by someone else.
    1
  2414. Well, unless you actually believe claptrap reported by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), this arrest had nothing to do with it.
    1
  2415. Responsibility for what?
    1
  2416. Ashamed for what? For upholding the law?
    1
  2417. Well, then you will be happy to learn that this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. July 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = arrest video made public. December 2023 = video goes viral. Other than one obscure article on a website I've never heard of, nobody knew anything about this arrest until after she was long dead.
    1
  2418. Repercussions (spelled correctly)? You do know that nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, right? What repercussions?
    1
  2419. Why would this particular arrest humiliate her so badly? None of her other million arrests, nor her time spent in prison, humiliated her. What's special about this one?
    1
  2420. Yes, you prefer delusion vs. accuracy.
    1
  2421. Can you name any media that even published this story before she was dead?
    1
  2422.  @coltconnorproductions1016  Nope. You didn't.
    1
  2423. Why would you say that?
    1
  2424. Learn the difference between an infraction and a crime. And, the police kept the video private for 2.5 years, and didn't release it until she was dead for 1.5 years. How much longer do you think they'd be allowed to keep it private, if faced with a FOIA request?
    1
  2425. Yes, that's probably good advice. But, it wouldn't have mattered in this case. One of the "audience" caught it on camera, and showed the video to the police. It didn't match her story about nobody being around. One of the witnesses said it seemed quite deliberate. So, she was getting arrested either way. And, even if hypothetically she could avoid this arrest by staying silent, they'd still have arrested her on any number of her open warrants for failures to appear on many prior arrests.
    1
  2426. But, shame had nothing to do with it. She killed herself a year after getting arrested. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after that. And, hey, if you want to avoid feeling shame, how about NOT putting on a public show in front of families on a beach? I mean, you don't actually believe her when she said she didn't know people were around, and that it only lasted a few seconds, do you? The family that reported her recorded it on video, and the police watched that video and wrote about it in their report, and said that it was a very loud and public display that went on for a while (not a few seconds).
    1
  2427. Yeah, police need to stop doing their jobs. You tell 'em!!
    1
  2428. What humiliation would that be? A couple of obscure blog posts nobody had ever heard of? 99.9999% of the media coverage never happened until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2429. Family and friends? You mean those people she walked out on more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs?
    1
  2430. Wrong. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died more than 2 years ago.
    1
  2431. Well, with her extensive criminal history, felony time spent in prison, million other arrests, she should have been pretty used to it by then. And, if she didn't like "exposure," why'd she choose to be a stripper?
    1
  2432. Multiple people called the police. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Sorry, but it didn't match her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. Why would you believe her anyway? Because she said so, as she was trying to get out of her millionth arrest?
    1
  2433. Where'd you get that idea?
    1
  2434. Wrong. The arrest video wasn't even made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. She never suffered any shame from the release of the arrest video.
    1
  2435. Huh? First of all, they didn't cover this story until 1.5 years after her death. Secondly, they paint this amazingly inaccurate picture (in her favor), making her out to be an innocent soccer mom who was arrested by evil police and couldn't handle the situation. The reality is that she abandoned her family over a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She did a felony prison term about 6 years ago, and was arrested a million times before and after. Stealing cars, failures to appear, drug and alcohol charges, other thefts, you name it. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. But, Inside Edition still says she was a real estate agent (sure, like 15 years ago or something). They seem overly sensitive to me. Personally, I prefer accuracy.
    1
  2436. Yes, but the facts don't match that belief.
    1
  2437. This incident happened on July 1, 2021. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023 (2.5 years later). Nobody saw it while she was alive. So, no, this video didn't have anything to do with why she chose to exit the world.
    1
  2438. Huh? The answer is rather simple: if she didn't want the woman in the audience recording her on the beach, don't do that particular act on the beach.
    1
  2439. Oh, well, you're clearly a legal expert, far beyond my level. So, can you explain when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2440.  @EmilyTienne  Stop blaming the good guys for doing their jobs correctly. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, 1.5 years of which she was already dead. But, eventually, they can no longer block a legal Freedom of Information Act request, once a case has been closed that long.
    1
  2441. Well, they DIDN'T release the video of the actual action at the beach. But, yes, the arrest video was subject to the Freedom of Information Act, and was released 2.5 years later. What's your point?
    1
  2442. Of course it's not true. This is Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. I mean, it's true she killed herself. But, it's not true that this incident had anything to do with it.
    1
  2443. That is a strong possibility. But, do you actually know this? Or, just an assumption.
    1
  2444. The arrest video wasn't released until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2445. It was released on November 24, 2023. The publication date is easy to find. And, c'mon, you didn't really trust Inside Edition to give a straight story, did you?
    1
  2446. You cannot even formulate a coherent sentence. You're in no position to judge stupidity.
    1
  2447. Nice libel there. Keep your obvious hatred to yourself.
    1
  2448. Do you not understand body-cams? But, the police managed to keep the arrest video private until 1.5 years after she died. After that, they can't block FOIA requests any longer.
    1
  2449. I reject your claim outright. First of all, the video was never released. So, I seriously doubt YOU saw it. Secondly, the police described the video in the arrest report, and it contradicts your claim (and her claim) entirely. They said it was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  2450. Can you even name any media that covered this story while she was alive?
    1
  2451. The Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you. And, stop pretending you understand police procedures, when you clearly don't.
    1
  2452. Huh? Who was shaming her?
    1
  2453. Dewdrop, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police actually prevented the release of this video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, eventually, they couldn't block the release any longer.
    1
  2454. Why? For correctly doing their jobs?
    1
  2455. And, if they called about a guy at a playground cranking it in front of children, would you say the same?
    1
  2456. She put on a show in front of children, dewdrop. It makes no difference if it was at a playground or beach.
    1
  2457. Because Inside Edition told you so.
    1
  2458. I wonder if you're aware that the woman in the video is was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, had a million other arrests, and was a stripper at the local club? I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans. I wonder if you're aware that multiple people called the police, and one of them took video of the incident and gave a copy to the police? I wonder if you're aware that the content of the video doesn't match her little story about being alone?
    1
  2459. How about NOT blaming innocent bystanders, dewdrop?
    1
  2460. Well, thankfully, you don't make the laws. Society does. And, society disagrees with you.
    1
  2461. I can't decide whether to flag this as spam, or flag it as misinformation....
    1
  2462. OK, but, I don't quite understand the grounds of the suit. What's the exact basis?
    1
  2463. Um, no. You have a real timeline problem with what you're claiming. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Put on TV = December 2023.
    1
  2464. No. It's the difference between an infraction and a misdemeanor.
    1
  2465. Yeah, and after this video, I have no respect for Sylvester Stallone either. This video completely changed my image of him.
    1
  2466. The media is to blame for what?
    1
  2467. Wow .....how the people watching this video hold no accountability toward the actual criminal, and try to blame everyone else for her own crimes. Hint: stop blindly believing Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). She was a convicted felon who had an arrest record a mile long, and spent a term in a Florida prison. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. One of the "audience" recorded this incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2468. Huh? How do you embarrass a dead person?
    1
  2469. Dewdrop, she was arrested in July of 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. This arrest video wasn't made public until November of 2023. Sorry for reality. And, sorry you believe deceptive Inside Edition videos. I have a bridge for sale, though. Interested?
    1
  2470. Huh? The video wasn't posted until she was dead for 1.5 years. She experienced ZERO shame from the posting of the arrest video from 2.5 years prior, because she was no longer alive to even know it was posted.
    1
  2471. Putting on a show at a public beach in front of children is an aggravated misdemeanor.
    1
  2472. Her name is well publicized. But, so what? This had nothing to do with her suicide, despite the efforts of Inside Edition to be deceptive.
    1
  2473. They did. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody ever saw it.
    1
  2474. And, you believe that, why? Because Inside Edition said so? What "shame" do you think she suffered?
    1
  2475. Wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. The police described in in their arrest report as a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. She was getting arrested no matter what she said, or didn't say.
    1
  2476. That's generally good advice. However, it wouldn't have mattered all that much in this incident. Multiple people called the police. One of them captured the event on video, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match her claims about a discreet act with nobody around. It's not uncommon for criminals to lie when questioned, you know. I'm sure she wanted to avoid her millionth arrest, and was hoping they'd let her go before they realized she had so many open warrants for other arrests and failures to appear in court.
    1
  2477. Huh? Do you not know the difference between crimes and infractions? And, a court summons? You think you issue those for crimes? What? A ticket? Did you flunk Civics 101?
    1
  2478. It's the difference between an open investigation and a closed one. Like, for this particular arrest video, the police blocked the release for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she died. She was dead, so, the investigation had been closed long enough to release the video in the event of a legal FOIA request.
    1
  2479. They caused WHAT?
    1
  2480. No. The media is getting the views and clicks 1.5 years AFTER she died. Still bad, I agree. They shouldn't be capitalizing on a woman's suicide. But, make no mistake here, social media was not involved until long after she already died.
    1
  2481. Yeah, the same ones that didn't think she should have been arrested. They don't know what they're talking about.
    1
  2482. Inside Edition didn't run a single story on her while she was alive. So, um, no.
    1
  2483. Well, you can make all of the little observations you want. The only relevant one for this video is whether or not what she did was against the law, or not.
    1
  2484. So, you're blaming the victims, not the criminal?
    1
  2485. When did they start giving warnings for misdemeanors?
    1
  2486. YAAAAAAAAAAAAAY. Another person saying to handle it differently, but never saying how.
    1
  2487. A verbal warning for an aggravated misdemeanor? Huh?
    1
  2488. But nobody saw the arrest video when she was alive.
    1
  2489. She had an audience.
    1
  2490. Yeah, kinda strange that they didn't tell you 2 weeks ago that she was already dead for 1.5 years, right? Instead, they want you to believe that the release of that video made her commit suicide.
    1
  2491. Like how? What do you suggest?
    1
  2492. 1) You get arrested for misdemeanors, not a ticket, not a warning, not asked to leave. Arrested. Period.
    1
  2493. 2) You get put in cuffs if arrested. Period.
    1
  2494. 3) Cops were quite kind and discreet because they asked her to leave the restaurant to ask her the questions, outside the view of others, so nobody could see/hear what was going on.
    1
  2495. 4) Yes, they had to walk back through the restaurant because that was the path back to the police car, but, other than that, they kept it as quiet as possible.
    1
  2496. 5) Multiple people called the police for this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and showed the video to the police.
    1
  2497. 6) One of the witnesses even told the police that she had wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, then chose a spot in full view of people.
    1
  2498. 7) You seem to believe her claim of nobody being around. Why? She's a woman who was trying to avoid being arrested for the umpteenth time, so, yeah, she'll try to say anything. "I didn't do it" is a very common claim.
    1
  2499. 8) With the number of outstanding warrants on her, you don't think the cops should arrest her?
    1
  2500. 10) According to her landlord, her real "profession" wasn't a real estate agent (she hadn't sold a house in many years), but, ya know, one of those professions that women do when they can't get a job, but YouTube bans the postings with those words... you get the idea. Is it that far fetched to you that she'd put on a public display on a beach?
    1
  2501. 11) The police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. So, the woman suffered zero shame from the release of the arrest video, because she was not alive when it was released.
    1
  2502. I had to break apart my response because it was getting blocked. I see it didn't like #9, so, I'll reword.
    1
  2503. 9) With her mile long legal history of arrests, prison term for stealing cars, legal judgements against her for various thefts, drug and alcohol problems galore, numerous failures to appear in court, attempts to change her name to evade prosecution, why in the world would you believe a single word she says?
    1
  2504. 12) The video taken by the witness and showed to the police was depicted in her arrest report as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  2505. Oh no you don't. You blamed the officers for her death, remember? Now, if the best you can muster is the officers went back through the restaurant (which was the path back out to the police cars), and you think that puts blame on them for her death... what more can I really say? You're just one of those people incapable of ever uttering the words "I was wrong."
    1
  2506. They bear ZERO responsibility for her death. Stop being ridiculous. You don't know what you're talking about, but you refuse to admit it.
    1
  2507. Well, my guess is that she didn't want to deal with another term in prison. Not that I think this arrest would matter. Even with her extensive criminal history, this incident is probably negotiated down to a minor infraction. But, with everything else piling up, and the fact that the courts wouldn't let her change her name to evade police, and her life completely off the rails for more than a decade, she probably just finally cracked under the weight of it all.
    1
  2508. And, you believe her? Why? On a side note, I have a bridge for sale. Interested?
    1
  2509. I agree. But, how do you prevent it? And, at least nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  2510. Multiple people called, not just one. And, you seem to be implying that they shouldn't have called. Why not?
    1
  2511. Dewdrop, the arrest report has all of the details.
    1
  2512. Yeah, blame the victim, not the criminal herself.
    1
  2513. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = she decided to exit this world. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request (no, not FOIL).
    1
  2514. The Freedom of Information ACT is a federal law.
    1
  2515. Can you name any media that even covered anything about this story before she died? How much "exposure" do you think she actually got? A couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of?
    1
  2516. The arrest video ended up on the internet because of a Freedom of Information Act request. But, the police successfully blocked the release for 2.5 years (she was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the arrest video). At least they're still blocking the release of the video of the incident itself (graphic content). What's your complaint exactly?
    1
  2517. ****Inside Edition never even covered this story until 1.5 years after she died.*****
    1
  2518. Um, no. Not even close. SHE was the exhibitionist. Why do you believe she thought nobody was around? Because she said so while trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2519.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  The police report only mentions one video taken of the incident.
    1
  2520. You saw which video? The video taken of the woman by one of the "audience," that was shown to police, and mentioned in their report? I didn't think that video was ever posted anywhere, so, maybe you're talking about the arrest video? But, that doesn't make sense either, because that video wasn't made public until November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. So, it wouldn't make sense that you're blaming her suicide on that video. Anyway, can you clarify?
    1
  2521. They didn't give her a ticket. Why would you think they did?
    1
  2522. Huh? This woman in this video had an extensive criminal history. She did a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. And, she had a million other arrests before and after. Seems that most of them were for drugs and alcohol. So, spare the world your obvious hatred.
    1
  2523. Well, I agree. And, the only saving grace was that she didn't get any publicity until long after she was dead.
    1
  2524. Was that a 9mm overdose, or .22 overdose?
    1
  2525. Wow. I have some Kool-Aid, want some? What got her arrested was the multiple people who called and said she was doing it intentionally, and the person who recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. Furthermore, with her extensive criminal record and open warrants, make no mistake here, she was getting arrested either way. Why do you believe she thought she was alone? You believe the convicted felon instead of the innocent bystanders and police?
    1
  2526. Yet, you won't name the other party in this suit? The ether? Poseidon? Just who do you think would pay anything to the family, and for what reason?
    1
  2527. Was this posting supposed to be a response to a different posting? (in which case, you didn't actually respond to the person) .... Or, just general?
    1
  2528. Or, oh, you were addressing what was said from one of the guys in the video?
    1
  2529. Yeah, take the law into your own hands, and don't tell the police if there's a crime happening. Never report criminals, because Inside Edition says that they might kill themselves.
    1
  2530. Huh? Multiple people called the police. One woman even video recorded it with her cell phone. The police saw the video and described it as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. Sorry if this doesn't match the "nobody was around" version that the woman is trying to portray while attempting to avoid getting arrested. But, seriously? Do you really think that the cops have a choice in this matter? They can just ignore a crime and tell the woman to go home, like it was just a minor traffic infraction? When there's video evidence and a crowd of people? And, exactly how is the internet a deadly weapon? She didn't commit suicide over this. You don't actually believe Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  2531. So, you refuse to answer a single question I asked, and, instead, you try to wiggle out of it and spew a bunch of nonsense. Dewdrop, you do not know what you're talking about!!! Your original claim was that they shouldn't have arrested her. Your original claim was that the cops should just send her home. Now, you're saying a completely different thing. Good grief. What story will you tell in the next version?
    1
  2532. Nobody did anything "to" her, dewdrop.
    1
  2533. Why is it that people like you never say HOW you wanted it done differently? Or, when you people do, you say you wanted the family to go up to the woman and talk to her? Nobody is going to approach a man or woman while cranking it.
    1
  2534. Try doing it in front of kids and watch your opinion change instantly.
    1
  2535. Of they give of a ticket of for of a misdemeanor? Of what of about her open warrants of of? Don't of you think of they'd have to of arrest of her anyway of?
    1
  2536. What "social media" company even published this story before she was dead?
    1
  2537. You don't think people should be arrested for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2538. The general rule is that they blur the faces and hide identities for open investigations. Given that she died more than 2 years ago, this investigation has long been closed.
    1
  2539. But, there was no TV coverage until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  2540. Huh? What exactly should the cops have done differently?
    1
  2541. Correct. She said that. So what? Do you believe her?
    1
  2542. I tried putting this in Google translator, and it still didn't mean anything. Can you maybe try writing it in your native language, and then readers can translate for themselves?
    1
  2543. Two things: 1) Why do you think she didn't do this intentionally? The witnesses thought it was intentional. The video taken by one of the "audience" certainly shows her in front of multiple people including children. She said nobody was around when she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest and potentially going back into prison again. "I didn't do it" is a very common claim of criminals being arrested. What reason do you have to believe a single word? 2) They DID restrain the publicity. They took her away from the restaurant to question her, so nobody could see/hear what was going on. And, they didn't release the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was already dead. What more do you want?
    1
  2544.  @aaad3552  I don't know what you're saying, and neither do you. I appreciate that you try to write in English. I'm sure your English is better than my [whatever your language is], but, I see you posting in many threads, and nothing you've written means anything. Try writing in your native language and let people just translate.
    1
  2545. You're the legal expert here, not me, so, maybe you can explain when they started giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2546. Why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2547. Um, she WAS a hardcore criminal!!! She was a convicted felon who served a term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and had countless arrests/convictions/judgements for various crimes before and after.
    1
  2548. The shame should be squarely on the stripper (yes, that's right, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club) who was almost undoubtedly making "public beach" content in front of multiple people including children. You do know that one of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police, right? You're not just basing your opinions on a 1 minute video by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter)?
    1
  2549. Well, nothing you're saying here applies to this incident. She never showed up at court, so, you're correct when you say she wasn't convicted. But, the most likely result, had she shown up, even with her long history of crimes, her felony term served in prison, and her mile long arrest record for various crimes... would have probably been that it would be negotiated down to a minor infraction and she would have been required to serve some sort of community service and gotten some counseling. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later (as a result of a legal FOIA request). Nobody in the media showed the arrest until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2550. Um, ok, but can you name anybody who even profited from this story before she died?
    1
  2551. Huh? They never had the video. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. And, the video of the incident itself was never released. The Smoking Gun only got about 200 hits, essentially zero.
    1
  2552. Wow. You truly drank the Kool-Aid. Um, sorry, but no. Multiple people called the police. One woman even recorded it with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. It's described in the arrest report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. One of the witnesses even said that the woman wandered up and down the beach for a while, looking for a place to do this, then plopped down in front of a family with kids. And, you're claiming that she wouldn't have done it, why? Because she said so while trying not to get arrested for the umpteenth time? Nice woman? With her mile long arrest and prison record, did some time for stealing cars, multiple judgements against her for various other thefts, numerous failures to appear in court, attempting to change her name to avoid arrest and legal processes, a long history of drug and alcohol issues, a welfare case who didn't pay rent, and abandoning her family including a 6 month old child so that she could go "wild" and "off the rails" (the words spoken by her own family)... nice woman?
    1
  2553. So, after you first spewed a whole bunch of stuff you knew nothing about, you're now following up with another pile of stuff you know nothing about. You don't know the difference between a crime and an infraction. And, you have no knowledge of the Freedom of Information Act. Instead, in both postings now, you keep pointing blame where it doesn't belong. Why? Why do you pretend you know things you don't?
    1
  2554. That's good advice. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" captured it on video. She was going to get arrested either way.
    1
  2555. Well, that's because they didn't tell you she was already dead for 1.5 years by the time the arrest video was released. Videos go more viral by misleading viewers.
    1
  2556. Did you read the police report that described the public display she put on, as seen in the video taken by the family that saw her? Note: according to the report, it was not just a few seconds, nor was it discreet. It was apparently described as a very loud and public act that lasted about 5 minutes.
    1
  2557. Yup, you're right. It doesn't sound right, because it's not. The reality is that she was arrested in July of 2021, she killed herself in March of 2022, and the arrest video wasn't made public until November of 2023. She was dead 1.5 years before the public knew anything about the arrest. Thus, it had nothing to do with her suicide. What we have here is yet another sensationalist video designed to get lots of hits (ad revenue), while playing word games, carefully crafting what they say to skew people into coming to the wrong conclusions.
    1
  2558. OK, well, they successfully blocked the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was dead. And, when they did, it was because of a legal FOIA request. So, now what? What happens to this suit of yours?
    1
  2559. One of the audience took video of the incident itself and gave it to the police.
    1
  2560. Your hatred is unjustified.
    1
  2561. Well, almost, but not quite. This incident didn't have anything to do with her suicide, and she suffered nearly zero humiliation from it. Almost zero media touched this story until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died in March of 2022.
    1
  2562. Yet, you cannot name something that they should have done differently? It's just wrong, and that's it, with zero suggestions on what could have been done better?
    1
  2563. If someone is already dead, how do you humiliate them into killing themselves? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, you know.
    1
  2564. Dewdrop, they only referenced the Smoking Gun blog. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died two years ago.
    1
  2565. Huh? They PREVENTED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive. But, once an investigation is closed for a long enough time, they can no longer block a legal FOIA request.
    1
  2566. Against who and on what basis please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1
  2567. And, what of her open warrants for her million other arrests and failures to appear in court?
    1
  2568. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023 (probably as the result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request).
    1
  2569. How would she know that? You're trying to say that an incident from July of 2021... she decided to kill herself in March of 2022... because she knew it would be public in November of 2023? Huh?
    1
  2570. Well, I agree that it's bad taste and inconsiderate to post the arrest video. However, let's also face reality here: nobody saw the arrest video until 2.5 years later, which was also 1.5 years after she was already dead. You don't get to accuse anybody of shaming her. Your issue from the start is trusting anything you see on Inside Edition.
    1
  2571. Huh? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. This incident was 3 years ago. She died 2 years ago. The arrest video was made public a couple of months ago.
    1
  2572. So, repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  2573. Freedom of Information Act. What do you propose they do about it? And, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, I fail to understand your complaint.
    1
  2574. Multiple people called the police. One of them recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it wasn't the discreet act with nobody around that the woman described as she was trying to talk her way out of her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again. And, what about her open warrants for failures to appear in court? If you're the cop, you're not arresting her?
    1
  2575. Yeah, they wanted two viral rounds instead of one. She actually died 2 years ago. But, to get two rounds, they released the first video without telling you she was dead, then a few weeks later, released the "update" to say she killed herself.
    1
  2576. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    1
  2577. Who did? Who is "they"?
    1
  2578. What is your suit based upon? And, against who exactly?
    1
  2579. Or, maybe you should be the one to feel guilty for pretending to know things you do not.
    1
  2580. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2581. Performing that act in front of kids in public is an aggravated misdemeanor. Also, she had a bunch of open warrants from other prior arrests.
    1
  2582. Huh? Who's "hiding" behind what?
    1
  2583. But, none of the big news outlet covered it until after she was dead 1.5 years. She suffered nearly no shame or anguish from this arrest. Furthermore, with her mile long record, prison term for stealing cars, arrests for theft and drugs and alcohol, multiple judgements against her, repeated failures to appear in court, open warrants, etc., I'd say she must have been pretty used to getting arrested by this point.
    1
  2584.  @sup_with_a_duck5794  Nope. The release date of the arrest video was November 24, 2023.
    1
  2585. Nope, it was suicide.
    1
  2586. Wow, what a thorough comment. You leave nothing to the imagination at all. Congratulations.
    1
  2587. Brother me nothing yet.
    1
  2588. Why? Because you believe everything you see on trash news like Inside Edition?
    1
  2589. The general rule is to blur for open investigations, and not blur for closed ones. Given that the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then, there was no need to blur.
    1
  2590. Strange that people on the internet pretend to know things they don't.
    1
  2591. How dare you make this accusation? The police did everything correctly. And, they prevented the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was dead. But, you're blaming them?
    1
  2592. Huh? Who is "they" (drove her)?
    1
  2593. Sorry, but you have confused an infraction with a crime. And, with the witnesses, the video of the incident itself, her admission of guilt, her mile long arrest record and felony prison term, and the number of open warrants for her arrest for various failures to appear in court, there was NO WAY she was going home.
    1
  2594. Well, at least nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  2595. Yeah, because the facts don't match that version. They said they herd the ruckus a month prior to finding her. The medical examiner's report said her last know date she was alive was 12 days prior, not a month prior. And, the scene fully matched a suicide. It's sad she didn't die instantly from the gunshot wound, and had to suffer and stumble around before she bled out. But, there's no evidence that any struggle resulted in her death.
    1
  2596. Because, blame the victim, and not the criminal, eh?
    1
  2597. Of course, not a single one of you "handle it differently" people ever say how exactly.
    1
  2598. So, you're blaming officers, and not the criminal herself?
    1
  2599. First of all, tickets don't apply. You've confused infractions with crimes. Secondly, she suffered nearly zero shame from this, since the bodycam wasn't released until long after her death. And, thirdly, really? With her mile long arrest record, her felony prison term for stealing cars, the tons of open warrants for failing to appear in court, the repeated charges for drugs and alcohol, the judgements against her for various thefts, do you really think they weren't going to arrest her?
    1
  2600. Yeah, let's ban social music.
    1
  2601. Because she was long dead and the investigation was no longer open. And, yes, she was a criminal also.
    1
  2602. To blame for what? I'll never understand why some people think such a cryptic comment is supposed to mean something.
    1
  2603. Don't tell me to "think" when you didn't make it clear from the start. So many people blame police and media for her death, so, I didn't know if that's what you were saying also, or if it was something else.
    1
  2604. I doubt she suffered much at all for this incident. It was just yet another arrest to add to her pile of a million arrests. And, big media didn't cover it until long after she was dead.
    1
  2605. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground, leave him be.
    1
  2606. Sure, if you believe Inside Edition. The reality is that this certainly wasn't her first arrest. And, this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  2607. Huh? The video wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2608. No. Why would you think that? Because Inside Edition says so?
    1
  2609. Um, no. Multiple people called this in. One of them even recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the cops. So, yes, they had her on video doing what she did. She probably spoke because she thought there was a chance that she could cry her way out of it, before they looked her up and found all of the open warrants she had. If she didn't talk, there was a 100% chance they'd look her up.
    1
  2610. And, the video that the witnesses provided? The video of the actual "event" she performed? How does that factor into your ridiculous conclusion?
    1
  2611. So, you're claiming that the 3 officers falsified the report?
    1
  2612. Or, you can just read the arrest report. You can stop pretending now.
    1
  2613. I wasn't debating about whether she should keep her mouth shut. My point was that she probably believed that talking and crying her way out of it gave her a chance that they wouldn't look her up, and just let her go. Not talking would give a 100% chance that they'd look her up. Besides simply not doing what she did (probably making "public beach" content for her fans), the other thing she should have done was show up in court. But, that's a whole different story. The reports say that she was down to about 80 pounds (with implants, probably in the 70s for her natural body). So, after this incident, she continued to go downhill fast.
    1
  2614. Well, first of all, she didn't end her life because of it. Secondly, the police didn't release the video until 1.5 years after she was dead. Third, lapse of judgement? Huh? This was her millionth arrest. If she didn't learn judgement from her felony prison term, I don't think she had any judgement to lapse.
    1
  2615. Wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24,, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  2616. Side note: most ironic nickname on the internet. Reality check denies reality.
    1
  2617. Still denying reality, eh?
    1
  2618. Oh, I can answer your questions: 1) This was a misdemeanor crime, not an infraction. There's no such thing as a citation for this. Also, with her criminal history and open warrants, she'd be arrested either way. 2) They released the video because the Freedom of Information Act requires it. But, she suffered zero humiliation from it, because she was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  2619. Of they? Of posting of video of Freedom of Information Act. Of didn't of ruin of her of life of because of nobody of saw it of until she of was dead for of 1.5 of years.
    1
  2620. How much humiliation do you think she suffered from? Who even knew about this arrest while she was alive? And, according to her landlord, she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. If she easily gets humiliated, she sure picked a strange career path.
    1
  2621. First of all, social media didn't cover this story until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. So, it had nothing to do with her death in March of 2022. Secondly, yes, the path through the restaurant was the way to get back to the police cars. Third, c'mon, get real here, with her mile long arrest record, and her felony time she served in prison, let's face reality, she must have been used to the cuffs by then. Fourth, she is the one who chose to do that on the beach in view of multiple people including children. I mean, you don't actually believe her story about nobody being around, do you?
    1
  2622. Huh? She was a convicted felon who spent a term in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests and convictions. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. You name it. But, she's not a "real criminal" in your mind?
    1
  2623. Who did it?
    1
  2624. Spare the world, seriously. Nobody goes up to someone who is in the middle of cranking it to have a conversation.
    1
  2625. Except one of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. She DID lie. They describe the video in their police report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children. And, one of the witnesses said that it looked like she was putting on the show intentionally. Sorry if that doesn't match the words spoken by the convicted felon who is trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time, but, hey, I'll stick with the good guys on this one. She was getting arrested either way.
    1
  2626. What's the basis for your suit? It seems like everything was proper to the letter.
    1
  2627. Dewdrop, they blur for open investigations, and don't blur for closed ones. She's been dead for more than 2 years. I'd say the investigation is closed.
    1
  2628. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released from legal FOIA request = November 24, 2023. So, no, dewdrop, nothing was "leaked," and there is no valid suit against anybody.
    1
  2629. Yeah, when you see a guy loudly cranking at the playground in front of kids, just go up and have a conversation.
    1
  2630. Of they really? Of in a society, of we want to of have police of to handle crimes of of. That's of what we of pay them for of. We of don't want of people of taking of crimes into of their own hands of.
    1
  2631. Can you name any social media that even posted anything about this incident before her death?
    1
  2632. The arrest video wasn't even public until 1.5 years after she died. Stop believing nonsense on Inside Edition, or any other sensationalist outfit like it.
    1
  2633. Read the police reports. Read the medical examiner's report. Look at the dates of everything.
    1
  2634. Just checking here... you do know that nobody saw the arrest video until she was already dead for more than 1.5 years, right?
    1
  2635. How do you bully someone after they're dead?
    1
  2636. Yeah, when a man in a playground cranks in front of kids, just leave him alone. It's trivial.
    1
  2637. Doubtful it would have mattered either way. One of the "audience" took video of the event and showed it to the police. She was getting arrested whether she said anything or not.
    1
  2638. How did you know it was going to happen on this particular arrest, as opposed to the other millions of arrests she had under her belt?
    1
  2639. The arrest video wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2640. Oh, that holds up in court soooooo well. No written reports, just verbal. And, you cannot possibly be serious. If they bust a guy for cranking at the playground in front of kids, they show up with a therapist? Seriously? Dial 911, "hi, can you send a therapist?" I don't know what planet you live on.
    1
  2641. Well, maybe knowing the actual timeline would help. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released (FOIA request). Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, with the exception of a couple of obscure blogs nobody has ever heard of, no news outlet ever even mentioned it until long after she was dead.
    1
  2642. So, your complaint here isn't about the woman who committed a crime and got arrested for the millionth time, but, instead, your complaint is that the pathway back to the cars was through the restaurant, rather than trudging through sand and scaling fences to go around the outside of the building? Putting on a show at a public beach wasn't embarrassing, but, walking through the restaurant was?
    1
  2643. When was there ever a right to privacy in public? And, if she wanted privacy, um, maybe don't put on "that" kind of show at a beach in front of children, huh?
    1
  2644. You think privacy is an inalienable right in public? Um, no. And, why do you think that a couple of obscure blog postings had anything to do with her suicide? Because Inside Edition asked the question about whether she was shamed? (Hint: the answer is no.)
    1
  2645. It's pretty clear to me that you know nothing about this issue outside of the 1 minute of Inside Edition coverage (where facts don't matter). The short version is that she was a convicted felon with a mile long arrest record and did a term in a Florida prison. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. She abandoned her career and family more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs instead. And, if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2646. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA. THAT is when the big coverage happened. Before then, only a couple of obscure blogs with a couple hundred hits.
    1
  2647. Of not? Of course of it shouldn't of happened of of. But, of the issue is that you of think privacy of is of a right in of public. And, of you don't of seem to of know that her of death had of nothing to do of with this arrest of.
    1
  2648. Why would you think this arrest led to her suicide? Because Inside Edition asked the question?
    1
  2649. No. They asked the question and never answered it. And, regardless, sorry you blindly believe nonsense.
    1
  2650. Yes, dewdrop. Read some of it. Start with the fact that nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, which completely negates the first message you posted.
    1
  2651. There were multiple callers. And, would you say the same if they called about a guy cranking at the playground? Don't call? Just let him be?
    1
  2652. That's proper for an infraction, but, this was a crime. For a crime, they really don't have that level of discretion.
    1
  2653. And, I wonder, if it was a man at a playground, would you say the same? Just pack up and go to a different playground?
    1
  2654.  @ASMRaholic  No, I wouldn't. I don't know how I'd stop it. Freedom of Information Act, you know. But, that had nothing to do with her suicide, because the arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was also 1.5 years after she died. So, the arrest video had absolutely nothing to do with her death.
    1
  2655.  @ASMRaholic  Well, it certainly wasn't her only arrest. She had other arrests for stealing cars and public drunkenness. But, anyway, I feel that I should emphasize that, again, I wouldn't post the video. I would have no desire to drag a woman's name in the mud merely for ad revenue. But, again, I just don't know how to stop it from happening, given the Freedom of Information Act. It doesn't require faces to be blurred.
    1
  2656. No, she didn't even appear in court, let alone was there any conviction.
    1
  2657. Even with her mile long record, time spent in prison, million other arrests, open warrants, etc., it's extremely doubtful that she'd be placed on any lists over this offense. This is easily negotiated down to a minor infraction. But, as usual (for her), she didn't show up at court to negotiate anything.
    1
  2658. Huh? How would you have handled it instead?
    1
  2659. Just checking here: you do know that virtually nobody even knew about this arrest while she was alive, right? You do know that this is just a highly modified and falsely skewed story by Inside Edition, right?
    1
  2660. Because a YouTube video said so. So, you believed it.
    1
  2661. Every word you wrote is comically misinformed. Every single word. Special emphasis on the fact that the PD prevented the release of the video for 2.5 years, until the Freedom of Information Act request required it. Note also that they have never released the video of the actual "event" (the show she put on in public) due to content.
    1
  2662. She experienced nearly zero shame for this incident, because it never went viral until long after she was dead. (She died 2 years ago, you know.) She hadn't really had a relationship with her family in about a decade, when she walked out in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. She was so estranged from everyone that her body was left rotting away until her landlord went into her apartment looking for the overdue rent. Nobody even knew she was missing.
    1
  2663. And, when they say that they didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then, what happens to your suit? And, when they explain that the Freedom of Information Act required them to release it, because the case was closed, and they could no longer block its release, then what happens to your suit? And, when they explain that the video of the incident itself remains blocked from release due to content, what happens to your suit? Did you get your law degree from YouTube University?
    1
  2664. Yes, the family took video. But, I don't think it was ever made public. They showed it to the police, who wrote about it in their report, though.
    1
  2665. You do know that there was video of the incident, right? You don't actually think that a 1 minute video is enough to form an opinion, do you? You think you understand this topic better than the 3 police officers?
    1
  2666. So, with your 1 minute of knowledge, you know she was a convicted felon who served time in prison and had a million various arrests, and open warrants, right? And, you know there was video of the incident, which directly contradicts her notion about nobody being around, right? And, you know her landlord said she was a stripper, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash out of her apartment. Tell me, where's your money on this one? Was she the innocent soccer mom Inside Edition is presenting? Or, was she making "public beach" content?
    1
  2667. Multiple callers. One of them recorded it and gave the video to the police.
    1
  2668. But, this had nothing to do with her death. None of this was made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2669. First of all, the Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you. Secondly, they blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. This incident was from July 1, 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2022. But, eventually, once the investigation was closed long enough, they could no longer block it. So, it was released on November 24, 2023.
    1
  2670. Do you even know the difference between an infraction and a crime? Speeding = infraction. Fishing without a license = infraction. But, indecent exposure = misdemeanor crime. You get arrested for a crime. You get a ticket for an infraction.
    1
  2671. "My 2 cents" is your nickname? Yeah, I think you've overestimated quite a bit.
    1
  2672. When you feel the need to lie to support your incoherent gibberish, sorry, you've already lost.
    1
  2673. Magic, you clearly know nothing about the legal system, nor what happened in this case. Stop pretending you do.
    1
  2674. 1) She wasn't shamed. The arrest video wasn't made public until she was dead for 1.5 years. 2) She probably didn't even know what the word "shame" would even mean. According to her landlord, she was a stripper who put on shows like this all the time. 3) She should be pretty used to being arrested by this point. She served a felony prison term. She had an arrest record a mile long. Open warrants. Numerous charges and judgements for various thefts and crimes. Drug and alcohol. You name it.
    1
  2675. Multiple people called to complain. One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around (the story she was trying to tell while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest and potentially going back to prison again).
    1
  2676. So, you believe they shouldn't do their jobs correctly?
    1
  2677. Really? And, where'd you get your legal degree? YouTube University?
    1
  2678. More than 2 years ago is "recently" in your mind?
    1
  2679. Freedom of Information Act. What's the basis for the suit? They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 of those years. So, how would you propose that the police could continue to block a legal FOIA request? Please share your massive legal expertise.
    1
  2680. Who publicly shamed her, and how?
    1
  2681. A ticket or warning for an aggravated misdemeanor? Where'd you get your law degree, YouTube University?
    1
  2682. Dewdrop, multiple people called. One of them recorded the incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her version about nobody being around. She had a criminal history a mile long, but, you'll go with whatever she says while trying to avoid her millionth arrest? Thanks, but, I'll stick with the innocent bystanders and the video of the incident, before I'll trust a word out of her. She's not exactly the most credible person, you know. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Etc. With her criminal and drug history, including a felony term in prison, it's tough to get a straight job, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2683. Why? How did that cause her suicide?
    1
  2684. Multiple people called it in. One of them recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. The arrest report says the video showed the incident was in view of children.
    1
  2685. Tell me, will you say the same about a guy who cranks at a playground in front of the kids?
    1
  2686. But, who do you believe humiliated her? A couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of? Nobody else really covered this story until 1.5 years after she died. And, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. Does that sound like someone who would feel shame over being exposed? And, why this arrest? Why not her other million arrests? Why not her felony term served in prison? None of those caused this massive shame you're talking about.
    1
  2687. Well, she was married, and had two sons (by two fathers). But, yeah, she left them all behind about a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. So, virtually single, and the rest of what you wrote was pretty accurate, according to all of the reports.
    1
  2688. Huh? Her face never went viral until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, WHAT did you see coming?
    1
  2689. Ridiculous. You don't have the foggiest clue.
    1
  2690. Many reasons, starting with the fact that the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2691. Huh? On what charge?
    1
  2692. But, the news never covered it until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  2693. Really? What's so special about this arrest, as opposed to her other million arrests? She didn't commit suicide when she did her felony term in prison. She didn't commit suicide over any of the other numerous arrests or judgements against her. But, THIS one did the trick? Why? Because a couple of blogs posted about the arrest? 99.99% of the media coverage never even happened until long after she was dead. And, what do you think would "shame" her anyway? Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Don't tell me you think she's embarrassed because someone saw her.
    1
  2694. Well, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, it was released as the result of a FOIA request. What do you expect?
    1
  2695. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  2696. Yeah, definitely not in good taste. But, how do you prevent it? Freedom of Information Act. I guess the only saving grace is that nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  2697. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2698. Well, the police can block a Freedom of Information Act request for any videos for an open investigation. But, since this video was from 2.5 years ago, and she already died 1.5 years ago, they could no longer block such a request, because she's been dead a long time, and the case is long closed. So, yeah, they had to release it.
    1
  2699. So, let me make sure I understand this viewpoint of yours... if someone commits a crime, police shouldn't arrest the person, for fear that he/she might kill themselves? Is that really your position?
    1
  2700. Huh? Do you really not understand that most of them wear those cameras on their chests nowadays? It's mandatory in many big cities now.
    1
  2701. What procedure should they have followed instead?
    1
  2702. Tell me about it. They delete about 1/2 of the messages nowadays.
    1
  2703. I agree, but, how would you propose to prevent it?
    1
  2704. Damage to her? She's dead. How much damage could happen because of the release of the arrest video?
    1
  2705. Who shamed her, and how?
    1
  2706. So, the only crime anybody can get arrested for is killing hundreds of people in Ecuador?
    1
  2707. First of all, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. Secondly, how do you get consent from a dead person?
    1
  2708. Well, at least it wasn't shared to the world until long after she died.
    1
  2709. Except for the video captured by one of the "audience," right?
    1
  2710. 1) Nearly zero media covered any of this when she was alive. While she was alive, one blog posting on a website I had never heard of said that she was arrested. But, the viral news coverage didn't happen until long after she was dead, when the arrest video was finally made public. She suffered zero shame from the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  2711. 2) Why do you believe she was alone? Because she said so while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest? People try to say "I didn't do it" in a million different ways to try to avoid getting arrested. The witnesses who called the police tell a very different story. They said that she wandered up and down the beach, and specifically chose a spot in view of others. One witness even captured the event on video, and showed it to the police. The arrest report says that it was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. I tend to trust innocent bystanders and the police more than I trust a convicted felon who served time in prison and had a million arrests for other stuff. You apparently go with whatever the felon says?
    1
  2712. But, dewdrop, she WASN'T humiliated over this. Did you not bother to read my replies?
    1
  2713. If you're not going to read anything, I really cannot help you. So, you just keep on swallowing everything Inside Edition feeds you, ok? They need viewers like you.
    1
  2714. And, you believe she killed herself over this, why? Because Inside Edition says so?
    1
  2715. Flagged for hate.
    1
  2716. Well, first of all, what do you propose we do about it? Repeal the Freedom of Information Act? And, secondly, while I agree that she shouldn't be publicized after she's dead, the silver lining is that she didn't suffer any of this shame while alive.
    1
  2717. But, she did lie. She said she thought nobody was around. But, the multiple people who called the cops said it was deliberate. And, one of them even recorded it and showed it to the police. The video didn't show someone who thought nobody was around. It showed her very loudly performing in view of multiple people, including children. But, I agree with you anyway. She should have just gone along, showed up in court, and negotiated this down to a minor infraction. Even though she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had a million arrests for other stuff, it's pretty doubtful that this particular arrest would have done much harm... if only she showed up in court.
    1
  2718. What in the world? The police quietly took her aside from the restaurant, so nobody could see or hear what was going on. And, then the police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. It was probably a legal FOIA request that got the video released. But, that was 1.5 years after she was already dead. She suffered ZERO humiliation from the release of the arrest video, because she wasn't alive to feel any of that shame.
    1
  2719. Yes, I agree. But, I imagine the media feels entitled to modify/edit the story to paint a false picture of what's going on, because of who she was in the first place. I doubt they'd actually run with the story if she was a wholesome woman who really just did a minor mistake that she thought was outside the view of anybody (the false story they're painting in the video). The reality is, however, that she was a convicted felon who spent time in prison for stealing cars, had a legal/arrest history a mile long, charges for drugs and alcohol, judgements for various thefts, numerous failures to appear in court with open arrest warrants, etc. And, with her legal history, it's tough to get a good job, so, according to her landlord, her profession was, well, one of those words that's not allowed to be written in YouTube comments... ya know... one of those careers that involves cash transactions with lots of men. So, I imagine the media knows all of that, thus concludes that it's ok to drag her name through the mud after she died. I disagree, and I think that if they're going to paint a picture, they should paint it accurately. But, overall, it would just be better not to have given this story any air time at all.
    1
  2720. Huh? I clearly said that I oppose the idea of making this video public. I said I agreed with you. Now, you're asking if I had something to do with the video? Good grief.
    1
  2721. First of all, it's fairly doubtful that anybody is reading that comment besides you and me. Maybe a few others now and then. But, the "damage" done by all of the videos viewed by millions upon millions of others is far more than what I could ever write in a comment. Secondly, at least I'm giving the accurate portrayal, rather than the heavily edited and skewed view designed to provoke reactions and made to go viral, just in the interest of ad revenue. Third, as I said, I was just trying to illustrate why I think these people feel "ok" about dragging her name through the mud. It's tough to make that point without actually stating the reasons.
    1
  2722. Oh, and everything I typed is readily available by reading the police reports, her criminal history, the medical examiner's report, listening to the interviews, etc.
    1
  2723. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2724. I will also add that every arrest is public record. They don't have to release the arrest video until the investigation is closed. But, they cannot prevent anybody from knowing that the arrest took place. As for a judge, well, maybe if she bothered to show up at court....
    1
  2725. Huh? July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  2726. Part of all arrests is being cuffed.
    1
  2727. Huh? The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it. Please elaborate on what you think they should have done differently?
    1
  2728. She chose to put on a show in front of multiple people including children. That's a misdemeanor.
    1
  2729. Who does?
    1
  2730. Because this was an arrest.
    1
  2731. The police managed to keep the arrest video private for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she was already dead, and then they just couldn't prevent it any longer, because the case was long closed. Freedom of Information Act. They can only stop a video from going public if there's an open investigation.
    1
  2732. Huh? Who even knew about it while she was alive? And, who in her life would "make fun"?
    1
  2733. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Oh, but keep on pretending to know things you don't. That's what YouTube is for, right?
    1
  2734. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  2735. Just keep pretending to know things you don't. Right?
    1
  2736. What family? The one she abandoned more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs?
    1
  2737. Innocent? With her mile long criminal history, felony term in a Florida prison, and a million other arrests? You do know that her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, right? If she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2738.  @HappyFlamingoBirds-xz6yb  Huh? The arrest video was not made public for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody ever saw the arrest video.
    1
  2739. "Police didn't have to release footy," So, the police should commit a felony and not abide by the Freedom of Information Act? Huh? "but pleasuring yourself on the beach means, you're not doing to well up there already." True, but, I wonder if she also wrote/spelled like a 2nd grader, just like you? "Suicide ultimately was her choice and I don't think this video would have prevented suicidal thoughts, it just would have made thee action take longer to occur if anything." Dewdrop, the video had nothing to do with her suicide. The arrest was in July of 2021. And, she went free and wasn't convicted. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The video was released in November of 2023, more than 1.5 years AFTER she committed suicide. "She was definitely planning to end her life at some point." Instead of playing armchair quarterback about incidents you know nothing about, how about going back to school to learn to read and write, huh?
    1
  2740. OK, but, what does any of that have to do with this woman? Almost nobody in the media even covered this story until 2.5 years later, and she was already dead a very long time before going viral.
    1
  2741. The police didn't post the arrest video. They released it because of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. But, that wasn't until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw the arrest video.
    1
  2742. Yeah, welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  2743. My favorite thing on YouTube is "they should have done this better" with absolutely no suggestion about how. It's experts like you who make YouTube the wonderful authority that it is, and why we don't need legal experts any longer.
    1
  2744. Nobody saw the arrest video until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2745. Public vs. private. In front of children vs. adult only.
    1
  2746. Inside Edition (spelled correctly) never even covered this story until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2747. Yeah, lots of people make videos about topics they know nothing about.
    1
  2748. Well, that's one way to 100% prove that you never read the arrest report. Um, no. Multiple people called, and 3 officers were dispatched. One of the "audience" recorded the incident and gave a copy to the police. It has never been released due to graphic content, but they give a pretty good written description in the report.
    1
  2749. Why? Because she said so, while trying to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2750. When was the "original story" in your mind? And, what version?
    1
  2751. You're clearly the legal expert here, not me, so, can you please enlighten me about when they started just giving warnings for aggravated misdemeanors? And, while you're at it, please explain about why, with all of her open warrants for prior arrests, you think they'd ever even be able to just let her go?
    1
  2752. The police blocked the release of the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died. What more do you expect?
    1
  2753. Sorry, you don't get to go back and edit out the part where you blamed police, and pretend you never said what you said. The police don't have any choice, dewdrop. They can only block the release while an investigation is open, or for other special circumstances. After that, they have to abide by the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2754. So, you edited your comment, and changing what you said? Sorry, dewdrop, I don't play that game. You and I both know what your original comment said.
    1
  2755. Sorry, but Inside Edition is never going to tell the real story. "Embarrassed soccer mom kills herself after being caught by evil police" goes viral. "Convicted felon who cannot stop getting herself arrested... gets arrested yet again, and kills herself a year later due to unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral.
    1
  2756. You can get a ticket for an infraction. Speeding. Fishing without a license. Parking in a handicap spot. Etc. But, for a crime, you get arrested.
    1
  2757. So, you don't understand the difference between a crime and an infraction, despite that I just explained it? And, trespassing? On a public beach? Where'd you get your law degree? In a bubble gum pack?
    1
  2758.  @Jason-lk9yi  Thanks, when I want advice from a clown, I'll seek it out.
    1
  2759. "did she get in front of that family and looked at them while pleasuring herself?" Yes, that's exactly what the witnesses said happened. They said she wandered up and down the beach looking for somewhere to do this, and plopped down in view of multiple people including children? One of the "audience" even caught it on video and gave a copy to the police.
    1
  2760. "i don’t think so" Why? Because that's what she said while trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time, and perhaps ending up back in prison again? Tell me, is this the first time you ever heard a felon saying "I didn't do it" when being arrested?
    1
  2761. "she did nothing wrong" Indecent exposure is a misdemeanor crime. It is aggravated when in front of children.
    1
  2762. "nothing really bad that would do something to the other people" Really? And, if it was a man at a playground, cranking in front of kids, would you be saying this?
    1
  2763. "Who ever called the police should be...." Sorry, that's not the definition of homicide. And, by your logic, nobody should ever call the police, for fear that the criminal might harm him/herself. What kind of society would that be?
    1
  2764. "because of them she killed herself" No, dewdrop. That's just this little fake story promoted by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). She was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long. Why would this one arrest matter all that much? And, she waited 9 months? C'mon.
    1
  2765. "media/news has the same guilt" Dewdrop, no news station even covered this story until after the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She's been dead for 2 years. So, um, no.
    1
  2766. The woman in the video had numerous drug and alcohol charges, yet, you're complaining that someone ELSE might use drugs? Good gods.
    1
  2767. Natural or not, you're not allowed to put on a show in front of children.
    1
  2768. Well, I don't like the story either. It's massively inaccurate. But, she never suffered any humiliation from Inside Edition. She was already dead for 1.5 years before they reported anything about it. So, liable for what, exactly?
    1
  2769. Another YouTube University School of Law proud graduate, huh? Every sentence you wrote was wrong. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  2770. But, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. So, how was she humiliated by it?
    1
  2771. I found a couple of obscure blogs. But, none of the big stuff dropped until long after she was dead. And, why do you even blame the media in the first place? Is there no accountability for a person's own actions? What about her other million arrests? What about her felony term spent in a Florida prison. She didn't lose her life for those? No? It was THIS particular arrest that did it, and she waited a year after THIS arrest?
    1
  2772. But, that's not what happened. They kept the arrest video private for almost 2.5 years. That means she was dead for 1.5 years by the time anybody ever saw the arrest video. After the case has been closed that long, they can no longer block a legal FOIA request.
    1
  2773. No major media covered any of this until after she was dead. She ruined her own life.
    1
  2774. Why? On what grounds?
    1
  2775. They give fines for crimes now? Where'd you get your law degree? A bubblegum package along with baseball cards?
    1
  2776. How do you "destroy" someone who already killed herself?
    1
  2777. I wonder if she wore that cross while doing her job? I mean, what with being a convicted felon who spent time in prison for stealing cars, with tons of arrests for drug and alcohol problems, open warrants for failures to appear in court, multiple judgements against her for various thefts, etc., I can imagine that it must be pretty tough to get a regular job after that. So, her landlord says that her "profession" was, well, one of those words you're not allowed to write in a YouTube comment without getting blocked... ya know... one of those "careers" that involves cash transactions with large numbers of men, right? It might be interesting to know if she wore her cross while "working."
    1
  2778. Yup, lots of videos tell lots of silly lies to get hits.
    1
  2779. Both.
    1
  2780. A) So, the media is never supposed to talk about arrests because they would be responsible if the person commits suicide? No accountability goes on the person herself? B) The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. Her suicide was in March of 2022. So, um, no.
    1
  2781. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. Once a case has been closed long enough, police do not have a choice, and must abide by a legal FOIA request. And, given that this was 2.5 years ago, and she had already been dead 1.5 years, yeah, the police probably had no choice but to release it. But, enlighten me, because I'm not a legal expert, what exactly is the basis for your lawsuit?
    1
  2782. Imagine if you actually knew what you were talking about.
    1
  2783. Yes, that's how they planned this story. They got two rounds of viral videos for the price of one. They released the video and didn't mention that she was already dead. It went viral. Then, they came back a few weeks later to say she died, and got another round of viral video out of it. The reality is that she's been dead for 2 years, they just didn't say so in their first round of reporting.
    1
  2784. What's wrong with you?
    1
  2785. Because it's a public place.
    1
  2786. Ok, I'd love to see that, but, I'm not sure what the actual lawsuit would allege. Can you clue me in?
    1
  2787. Huh? She abandoned her career and family more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs. She served a felony term in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests/convictions/judgements. She destroyed her own career, and, it's difficult to get a straight job after that. So, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentleman's club, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. I highly doubt this arrest would have any effect whatsoever on that "career," other than maybe INCREASE it. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported and was trying to cry her way out of it, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2788. Huh? It was forgotten. It was in the past. The arrest video wasn't even made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2789. It wasn't made public until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2790.  @sub2me543  No. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023.
    1
  2791.  @sub2me543  So, you're just going to delete your comment and post the same wrong stuff again? Um, no. I mean, this is very simple, if you think the video was released before November 24, 2023, demonstrate it. Show anywhere on the internet that this video existed before then. I just did an advanced Google search, and found only two articles/videos from before March 31, 2022, that show the arrest video. One had the meta data modified in the date field, and the site says it was actually only posted a month ago. Another was dated back in July of 2021, but, the video was added as a recent "update" to the article. Nowhere else does this video get shown to the public before 11/24/2023, at least not that Google knows. So, yeah, I'll stick with the official release date, thanks. Make up stories all you want. But, don't expect anybody to believe you.
    1
  2792.  @sub2me543  Oh, and 2nd reply in a row here. Your credibility is zero anyway, because I now see why you're going around and deleting your responses. You said in one of your postings: "she died about 1 month after the incident." Now, you're correcting yourself, and realizing it was +8 months later, not 1 month later. And, by the way, March 31, 2022 is the date she was found. It is uncertain about the exact date. The medical examiner's report says she was last known to be alive on March 19. It's a minor quibble about an insignificant thing. But, I'm just demonstrating, yet again, that you don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  2793. Yes, long after (the next year).
    1
  2794. Howso? Only a couple of obscure blogs published anything about this arrest while she was alive. Nothing was shown in any significant media until long after she was dead.
    1
  2795. On what basis? I see a million comments like this, but, nobody ever explains what the basis of the suit would be.
    1
  2796. Huh? The video of the incident disagrees with you.
    1
  2797.  @GazaRatts  Well, this arrest was in 2021, not 2024. But, it doesn't matter. The laws haven't changed since then.
    1
  2798. Denying it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police.
    1
  2799. That's quite an exaggeration. There were a couple of unrelated chuckles between two of the three cops, completely outside the view of the criminal, and none were directed AT her. They handled this arrest just fine. I imagine she probably saw much worse over her other million arrests, and while serving her felony term in prison about 6 years ago.
    1
  2800. Spare me. You don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  2801. According to the witnesses, it seemed that she knew people could see her. And, it doesn't appear that she suffered much humiliation over it. I'm sorry if you blindly believe a woman who is trying to wiggle out of getting arrested for the umpteenth time, but, yeah, criminals often say, "I didn't do it" in one form or another.
    1
  2802. Making stuff up out of thin air doesn't mean anything.
    1
  2803. But, the arrest video wasn't published until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive. And, it was eventually released due to legal FOIA request. The video of the incident itself was never released, and probably never will be. So, what exactly is your complaint?
    1
  2804. But, she really didn't suffer from much humiliation over it. A couple of blogs mentioned the arrest while she was alive. But, none of the really big coverage happened until long after she was dead.
    1
  2805. They blur faces for an open investigation. Since she's been dead for 2 years, there is no open investigation. But, the police department had nothing to say about the release of the arrest video, because the Freedom of Information Act required it. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, which was long after she died, but, could no longer block it. And, "defamation" applies to things that aren't true. This woman was arrested for this crime. There's nothing untrue there. As for another suit, what's the basis?
    1
  2806. But, contrary to the false picture painted by Inside Edition (trash news), she suffered nearly zero humiliation from this incident, because almost nobody covered it until long after she was dead.
    1
  2807. No, you have fallen for a media trick. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released (FOIA request). None of the big press happened until after the video was released. But, they wanted two viral rounds for the price of one. So, they released the story without saying she was already dead. Then, the released the 2nd wave showing the "update" that she died, pretending that the first wave caused the death.
    1
  2808. They never released the video of the "show" itself, but, they describe it in the arrest report. It was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Get real here. Nobody is going up to her in the middle of that. And, sorry, but this was an aggravated misdemeanor, so, yes, an arrest was warranted.
    1
  2809. Yeah, that's an interesting point, about the gun... with her prior arrest history of stealing cars and public drunkenness, I wonder if she was already a felon, and therefore shouldn't have been allowed to own a gun. But, of course, the reality is that anybody can get guns regardless of whether it's legal to own them or not.
    1
  2810. Yes, it's quite fake. They're painting the incorrect picture that this led to her suicide.
    1
  2811. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2812. Don't know, but, I'm guessing she was their primary customer.
    1
  2813. Well, thankfully, society disagrees. We employ police to handle crimes, rather than trying to take care of them ourselves.
    1
  2814. Dewdrop, an arrest doesn't need proof, just probable cause. Proof is for the court case. And, nobody even prosecuted her, because she never showed up at court. Do you not feel any obligation whatsoever to know something about a topic before you spew gibberish?
    1
  2815. Well, with her extensive criminal history, including a felony term in prison, and a million other arrests, I'm betting she knew that. But, I also bet that she figured she was between a rock and a hard place. She had been attempting to change her name to evade the police, but, they kept denying it due to her history and open warrants and everything. So, when facing yet another possible arrest, she probably knew that being silent would guarantee that they'd look her up, and find warrants, and arrest her. But, if she tried to talk her way out of it, there'd be a 50/50 chance that they'd let her go before looking her up.
    1
  2816. Well, first of all, nearly zero media covered anything about this incident until she was already dead for 1.5 years. So, um, no. Secondly, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. I don't think they get fired for exposing themselves.
    1
  2817. There is a lot more to the story... mainly in the fact that the real story doesn't match what these sensationalist journalists want you to believe.
    1
  2818. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2819. Freedom of Information Act. Arrest video was not published anywhere until after she was dead 1.5 years. Warnings do not apply to crimes. You have that confused with infractions. This woman with an arrest record a mile long and a felony prison term for stealing cars put on a public show in view of multiple people, including children, which was recorded by one of the "audience" and shown to the police. Read the police report yourself. You'll find out that the video version doesn't match the claims made by the woman who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  2820. Well, you could read the arrest report to learn that information. But, beware, it will also shatter your delusions about this incident. She was a convicted felon with a term spent in a Florida prison, and a million other arrests. One of the "audience" recorded the incident, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her "nobody was around" sob story. To the contrary, it was a very loud and public show, in view of multiple people including children. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, so, if she wasn't making "public beach" content, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2821. Multiple people called. Read the arrest report, and you'll find their names and what they said they saw. One of them even recorded it and gave the video to the police. How did this go down, in your mind? 3 cops dispatched to just frame some random woman?
    1
  2822. Huh? I don't quite understand what you're attempting to say. Yes, you're never alone with people around. But, wasn't that the entire point? She was doing this with people around.
    1
  2823. The arrest footage wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. It was probably the result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. They would never have released it during an ongoing investigation. Welcome to Inside Edition, who would NEVER actually give you these dates: Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023.
    1
  2824. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her story about nobody being around. So, it wouldn't have mattered what she said.
    1
  2825. Huh? Charged with what?
    1
  2826. Well, one of the "audience" recorded the incident on video, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their report as a very loud, and very public act, in view of multiple people, including children. So, yes, there was plenty of probable cause to arrest. Furthermore, with her mile long arrest record, prison term for stealing cars, multiple judgements for theft, drugs, and alcohol, and warrants for failure to appear in court, um, yeah, I'd say that she's getting arrested.
    1
  2827. Let her go? She had multiple calls and complaints. One of the audience even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Why would they let her go? And, other than a couple of obscure blogs, what media even covered it while she was alive?
    1
  2828. So, what's your solution? Cops shouldn't arrest criminals?
    1
  2829. Yeah, don't subscribe to Inside Audition. Hilarious!
    1
  2830. It's pretty doubtful that this incident had anything to do with her suicide. And, "a moment of weakness"? She was arrested a million times for various crimes, and even spent time in prison. Seems like a long streak of "moments of weakness."
    1
  2831. Yes, there were children there. Why don't you simply read the arrest report? Good grief. And, yes, she did it intentionally.
    1
  2832. Yeah, and, with her extensive criminal history and time spent in prison, you'd think she would know that. But, my guess is that she was hoping to cry her way out of it before they looked her up and found open warrants. If she had stayed silent, they'd 100% look her up.
    1
  2833. Plus, sorry if you you blindly swallow stuff you see on Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), but, according to her landlord, she was a "dancer" at the local club (yeah, THAT kind of "dancer"), and her neighbors said she did "private extras" out of her apartment for cash with a parade of men. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2834. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. The police do not have a choice. But, they did manage to block the release of the video for 2.5 years. So, nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive.
    1
  2835. Well, the silver lining is that the woman herself didn't suffer any embarrassment. The arrest was in July of 2021, the suicide was in March of 2022, and the arrest video was made public in November of 2023. She was dead over 1.5 years before the public saw the arrest video.
    1
  2836. Dewdrop, how about actually knowing something before spewing nonsense everywhere? This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. She suffered zero humiliation over the arrest video because nobody saw it until long after she was dead. And, sorry, but these little conspiracies about cops selling footage instead of a simple Freedom of Information Act request... well, you already lost your credibility because you didn't know the timeline of events... and you just made your credibility drop even further.
    1
  2837. Inside Edition told you so!! Therefore it must be true!! Whatever you do, NEVER fact-check Inside Edition!!
    1
  2838. Yes. I agree. And, the one saving grace is that she died 1.5 years before any of the public knew anything about this incident. So, she never personally had to suffer the consequence. She had enough bad stuff going on in her life already.
    1
  2839. Huh? The police took her away from the restaurant to question her outside anybody's earshot. And, then the police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it until long after she was dead. How did the police violate her privacy?
    1
  2840. Huh? July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  2841. She walked up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, plopped down in front of people, and put on a public show. The police describe the video as a very loud and public event in view of multiple people including children. You think anybody is going up to her to have a conversation? And, yeah, as for bad decisions, yeah, tell me about it. With her mile long criminal history, time spent in prison... and her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club... bad decisions seem to have been her norm.
    1
  2842. They didn't put anything on the news until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2843. Oh, so it's the officers' fault? What EXACTLY do you think the officers did wrong here?
    1
  2844. No, you have fallen for a classic Inside Edition skewing of the facts. This arrest was from July 1, 2021. She died in March of 2022. The arrest video was released (FOIA request) on November 24, 2023. So, they saw an opportunity to get two viral videos for the price of one. In late November (2023), they ran the viral story about the arrest, while not mentioning that she had already been dead 1.5 years. Then, a couple of weeks later, they ran this "update" story that she had committed suicide. Notice they ASK "was she shamed to death?" But, they never actually give the answer ("no"). Instead, they spew a bunch of stuff to make people falsely believe that this arrest led to her suicide. In reality, she suffered nearly zero shame, because the only ones that even covered this story while she was alive were a couple of obscure blog posts. Also notice that they don't mention that she abandoned her career and family more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs instead, and that she was a stripper at the local club. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, and was reported, so she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest and another term in prison.
    1
  2845. First of all, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Secondly, Freedom of Information Act. How do you propose the police prevent the release?
    1
  2846. Multiple people called the police. One of them took video of the incident and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match this version she's telling about a discreet act with nobody around, as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest. Sorry, but, if someone puts on that kind of show in front of children (which is what happened here), that person is getting arrested. You also have your timeline very wrong. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public. So, no, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide, because nobody saw it while she was alive. The video was released (1.5 years after her death) due to the Freedom of Information Act. I'm sorry that you don't understand anything about the law, but, you apparently feel very comfortable pretending you do.
    1
  2847. She abandoned her family including a husband and two boys (one was 6 months old) about a decade ago in order to live "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words). She ended up becoming a convicted felon who served a term in prison for stealing cars. She also had multiple judgements against her for other thefts and crimes. And, she had an arrest record a mile long for other things including drugs and alcohol. And, there were numerous warrants for failure to appear in court. She tried changing her name a few times to evade police, but, the courts wouldn't let her do that. After all of that, yes, it's difficult to get a straight job, so, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors said that she also did "private" cash transactions with men in her apartment. So, let's face reality here, it seemed that "shame" wasn't even part of her vocabulary. And, the witnesses at the beach also said that her "performance" appeared to be quite intentionally in front of others. The video showed a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  2848. Really? When did they start giving warnings for crimes? I thought that was only for infractions. But, you're the expert here. Can you enlighten me?
    1
  2849. Would those be the family and friends that she abandoned more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs?
    1
  2850. First of all, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Secondly, Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2851.  @Jackspaniel1  I only replied to you once. I don't know what you mean.
    1
  2852. As a general rule, they blur for open investigations, but not for closed ones.
    1
  2853. Why? Because some people made videos that distort the facts and pretend like she was murdered? Yes, indeed, read the details. Read the police report. Read the medical examiner's report. The only "odd" thing was that she lived with the gunshot wound to her head for a short while before dying. And, guess what, that happens sometimes (about 10% of the time) with low caliber bullets that only hit the prefrontal cortex, and no areas of the brain that actually control bodily functions. There's no evidence of any sort indicating that this was other than a suicide.
    1
  2854. She willfully put on a show at the beach in front of children. The arrest was justified. And, sorry, no "leaks" required. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2855. Huh? Multiple people called the police. One of them even took video of the incident and gave it to them. Sorry, but it didn't match her version of nobody being around. Quite to the contrary. Plus, she was a convicted felon who served time in prison about 6 years ago, and had been arrested a million times, and had multiple failures to appear with open warrants. But, you claim she shouldn't have been arrested?
    1
  2856. Huh? Nothing about her was ever on the news or national television until long after she was dead. And, her family? The one she abandoned for a life of crime and drugs and hadn't even seen for over a decade? Work? Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club. I don't think any of her "coworkers" would care one bit about putting on this kind of show.
    1
  2857. And, you just blindly believe her, right?
    1
  2858. Wow. Well, that's one way to demonstrate that you know absolutely nothing about this incident. Multiple people called. One of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It remains unreleased due to graphic content. But, they describe the contents in the report. It was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  2859. And, sorry, but she was getting arrested no matter what. With her extensive arrest history, time served in prison, and open warrants, yeah, there wasn't a different way this was going to go down.
    1
  2860. Just checking here... you do know that her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and neighbors said she did "private extras" out of her apartment for cash with parades of men... right? If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  2861. Or, did you prefer the Inside Edition viral version? "Innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police, can't stand the shame." Or, "woman who abandoned her career and family to live a life of crime and drugs, who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, then commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons." Which version goes viral? And, who believes a single thing on Inside Edition in the first place? (i.e. you)
    1
  2862. The point is, she had a criminal record a mile long, and was a "dancer," which lends zero credibility to the "innocent soccer mom was so ashamed" storyline.
    1
  2863. 1) You don't know the facts. 2) That's how it works, police arrest people for crimes. 3) It doesn't matter, one of the "audience" had it on video, and showed the police. 4) Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2864. "This poor women was shamed for something" -- Huh? How do you shame a dead person? What shame do you think she really suffered?
    1
  2865. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She walked out on her family, including a 6 month old son (and another son) over a decade ago, because she wanted to live a life of drugs and crime. Stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failure to appear, you name it. She had an arrest record a mile long. And, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment.
    1
  2866. No. The arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  2867. People need to return to grammar school also.
    1
  2868. The law doesn't work that way. You clearly know nothing about the difference between an infraction and a crime.
    1
  2869. The police did their jobs correctly, but, you blame them?
    1
  2870. Nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead. So, um, no.
    1
  2871. What news station ever aired it until after she was dead?
    1
  2872. So, basically, you just enjoy making comments straight out of your....
    1
  2873. I'm not the one here talking out of her be.... that's you, dewdrop.
    1
  2874. Let me make sure I understand you correctly... you want to give a citation for a crime? I mean, you do know the difference between crimes and infractions, right? (No, apparently not.) But, you think you know enough about the topic to fire the officers, huh?
    1
  2875.  @philipaubin4679  Yup, it's not news. It's viral media designed for ad revenue, no more, no less. It just bugs me that, not only shouldn't they have covered it at all, but, they did it by basically manufacturing a fake story. Yes, the arrest was quite warranted. But, why drag her name through more mud?
    1
  2876. Why would you say that?
    1
  2877. What family? The one she abandoned more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs?
    1
  2878. She was a convicted felon with a term served in a Florida prison, and a million other arrests.
    1
  2879. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club, and neighbors said she did cash "extras" in her apartment. So, spare me "dignity" comments.
    1
  2880. After she died, nobody was looking for her. The coroner's report said that she was dead so long that she was well into the maggot phase of decomposition, and weighed 84 pounds (with the implants, so, that's in the 70s without). That's how long she was dead with absolutely nobody looking for her. Family? Huh? Like I said, she left her family more than a decade ago.
    1
  2881. YES!!! Absolutely. Inside Edition's rendition of this story is horribly inaccurate, and doesn't serve anybody any good to paint this false picture. It's just there to generate ad revenue, and is massively deceptive. And, sorry I had to break up my reply into pieces. YouTube blocks so much stuff.
    1
  2882. The fact is that she was "wild" and "off the rails" (her own family's words). She walked out on her husband, and 6 month old son, and another son, more than a decade ago, because she wanted to live a life of crime and drugs. One of the audience recorded this incident, and gave the video to the police. It didn't match her sob story about nobody being around. So, again, "dignity" has nothing to do with that woman. She had none.
    1
  2883. I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but, got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest before they looked up her open warrants.
    1
  2884. Dewdrop, I'm not the topic here. There's no "self righteousness" involved. You spewed a heck of a lot of garbage into your postings, and didn't like being wrong. That's all that happened here.
    1
  2885. How do you get permission from someone who is dead?
    1
  2886. I agree that it would be nice if the arrest video wasn't released, but, I'm just not sure how anybody would have prevented it. It was 2.5 years later, and she was already dead for 1.5 years. They can't block a legal FOIA request for the arrest video at that point.
    1
  2887. Whoever posted what stuff should be held accountable for what?
    1
  2888. Spare the world, seriously. You clearly know nothing at all, so, don't go passing judgement about the people who called the police.
    1
  2889. You accused the family of causing her death. It's ridiculous.
    1
  2890. What a deepity.
    1
  2891. She gave up that career more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of crime and drugs. Her image was already beyond repair when she served a felony term in prison about 6 years ago, and had numerous judgements and convictions for a million other arrests. But, you want her to sue the witness that took video of her public show at the beach? I mean, I'll eat my hat if she wasn't taking video of it herself for her fan base. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. But, you think there's a valid suit when someone takes video of her at the beach committing a crime? Or, did you mean the arrest video taken from the chest-mounted camera? Either way, what exactly is the suit based upon?
    1
  2892. 1) No news stations even covered it until after she was dead. 2) What about the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  2893. It's unlikely this particular incident contributed to her choice a year later to end her life. Or, if it did, it was probably just a drop in the bucket. One more arrest to add to her pile of arrests probably wasn't going to matter one way or the other.
    1
  2894. OK, but, just making sure you know... social media never posted anything about this until long after she was dead... you know this, right?
    1
  2895. That's probably very good advice. But, it wouldn't have mattered here. One of the audience had it on video and showed it to the police (it didn't match her version of a discreet act with nobody around). And, with all of the open warrants for prior offenses when she refused to show up in court (which she repeated for this arrest also), she was getting arrested no matter what.
    1
  2896. Keep your obvious hatred to yourself, and stop spreading nonsense about topic you don't know anything about.
    1
  2897. Freedom of Information Act. They don't have any choice but to release it. The only way they can block it from being released is if there's still an open investigation. But, given that the arrest was 2.5 years ago, and she was dead 1.5 years ago, yeah, they can no longer block a legal FOIA request. The arrest video was never seen by anybody in the public until it was released on November 24, 2023. Her suicide was in March of 2022. Congratulations on spewing hateful garbage.
    1
  2898. Huh? The police prevented the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was dead for 1.5 of those years before it was released. Accountable for what? And, how would you prevent its eventual release due to a Freedom of Information Act request?
    1
  2899. Well, she committed LOTS of crimes. An arrest record a mile long. A felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. Bunches of drug & alcohol charges, stealing cars, other thefts, failures to appear, you name it. As for getting help, yeah, if she had bothered to show up in court for this incident, maybe they could have mandated that help. But, given her number of open warrants, it seems "no show" was her normal way of dealing with her arrests.
    1
  2900. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2901. Just checking here: you do know that virtually no media covered this until 1.5 years after she was dead, right?
    1
  2902. The Freedom of Information Act was responsible for releasing the video. But, accountable for what? It wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before any of the big media covered it.
    1
  2903. Huh? The police managed to keep the arrest video out of the public's eyes for 2.5 years. She was already dead for 1.5 years before it went public. And, that was probably because of a legal FOIA request. After the case was closed for that long, they can no longer block requests to release the video. I don't understand what you think should have been done differently here... other than the media pretending that this arrest video had anything to do with her suicide....
    1
  2904. Sarah K. Moss video recorded the incident on her cell phone. Sarah called the police after she left the beach and walked toward a bar. The police viewed the video, and described it in their police report. Apparently, it was a loud and graphic public display, far longer than the "few seconds" the girl is trying to say. But, I fail to understand how this relates to her suicide. Her arrest (one of several different arrests for different offenses) for this beach incident took place in July of 2021. She killed herself in March of 2022. And, the video wasn't made public until November of 2023. Her arrest had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  2905. If you feel the need to pray, you should be asking for a better brain. Yours doesn't work very well.
    1
  2906. Um, no. The video was not released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died. She suffered ZERO embarrassment from the release of the video (which was probably a result of a legal FOIA request), because she was already dead when it was released.
    1
  2907. No news even covered this story until long after she died. So, no, the news didn't cause anything. As for trying to be discreet, sorry, but the witnesses (and the video they took of the incident) disagree with you. Why would you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who spent a term in a Florida prison and had a million other arrests before and after.
    1
  2908. You can't spell it, but you think it's real. Hilarious!
    1
  2909. Yeah, but, what was so special about this particular arrest that you think made her kill herself about a year later? She didn't kill herself when she was serving her felony prison term. She didn't kill herself for any of her other million arrests. But, you think this little insignificant arrest made her wait about a year, then kill herself?
    1
  2910. Huh? The arrest report? What do YOU think it caused?
    1
  2911. Just one clarification: you're saying that you know she thought she was alone, because that's what she was saying to the police while trying to avoid her millionth arrest. But, let's face reality here. The witnesses said that they thought it was intentional, and one of them took video of the incident and showed it to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match this idea of thinking nobody was around. Quite to the contrary. And, given her mile long arrest record, her felony conviction and term she served in prison, her numerous charges for drugs and alcohol, and that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, yeah, frankly, I don't have a difficult time believing that she did it intentionally. Her family said that her biggest problems were the drugs and alcohol. So, yeah, her mind wasn't exactly stable.
    1
  2912. Agreed. But, how do you prevent it?
    1
  2913. Probably because of a legal Freedom of Information Act request.
    1
  2914. Well, the grass is always greener. For something like this, I'd agree with you. On the other hand, when public officials get busted for stuff, we want to see it. I wouldn't know how they could appease everyone.
    1
  2915. "she thought of it that after being blasted on the news" She did? Can you name a single news program that covered this while she was alive?
    1
  2916. "she would have to register" Get real. Even with her million other arrests and time spent in prison, this was easily negotiated down to a minor infraction (had she shown up in court instead of ditching).
    1
  2917. "for people to see the embarrassment" Huh? Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local club (yeah, that kind), and neighbors said she did "private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. In all probability, she was making "public beach" content for her fans, but, got reported, and tried to cry her way out of her millionth arrest.
    1
  2918. "friends" She didn't have any. As a matter of fact, nobody even went looking for her after she was gone. Not her husband or kids (she left them more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs). Not her parents. Nobody. The coroner's report said that, by the time the landlord went in looking for the overdue rent, she was gone so long, and in such an advanced state of decay, that her body weighed 84 pounds. I'm guessing that's below 80 pounds without the implants.
    1
  2919. "Back off on it" Oh, yes, I really want to take instruction from somebody who buys into fake stories made by Inside Edition (where facts don't matter).
    1
  2920. How should they have handled it instead?
    1
  2921. None of this was ever on the news or YouTube until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  2922. But, almost nobody covered this story while she was alive.
    1
  2923. Another graduate of YouTube School of Law, huh? You think they give citations for crimes? Do you understand the difference between a crime and an infraction? (Obviously not.) And, sorry, but nobody saw the video while she was alive. It wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years. Did YouTube University not teach you the Freedom of Information Act and how it works?
    1
  2924. Huh? Embarrassed twice?
    1
  2925. Wow, what a profound statement. Um, who? And, on what basis?
    1
  2926. The arrest video wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    1
  2927. Which media is to blame for what exactly?
    1
  2928. The media had nothing to do with her suicide. So, I wanted to know which media you were blaming for what exact thing?
    1
  2929. You clearly don't know the difference between an infraction and a crime. Police have discretion for the former, they don't for the latter. And, you think they humiliated her? Exactly how did they do that? What do you mean?
    1
  2930. Yet, you can't name these people? Is that like the proverbial "they"?
    1
  2931. And, you believed she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  2932. I'm not sure I understand your question. She had an arrest record a mile long, and served felony time in prison. But, given that her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private" transactions for cash in her apartment, yeah, I think it's safe to say she's put on these displays before.
    1
  2933. OK, and?
    1
  2934. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  2935. Nice slander/libel there.
    1
  2936. Actually, your attitude is the problem. We'll never advance society if the attitude is that there's no personal accountability. She chose to do that in public. She got arrested for it. That's not society's fault. That' fault is squarely on her. And, the more people that take your attitude, the more our society regresses.
    1
  2937. Huh? In what way? What in the world do you think the police did wrong here?
    1
  2938. But, this video wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years. What's the basis for your suit?
    1
  2939. Monopoly on violence? So, nobody is violent other than police? Good gods.
    1
  2940. A) You don't get a warning for crimes, you can get warnings for infractions. B) What "damage" do you think was done by the police?
    1
  2941. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  2942. OK, then your next step in that crusade is to get the Freedom of Information Act repealed.
    1
  2943. Huh? So, the multiple witnesses who called in, one of whom recorded it and gave the video to the police... those don't count?
    1
  2944. Shamed her? The police managed to keep this video out of the public eye until about 1.5 years after she died. Who is "they"? Whoever made the FOIA request?
    1
  2945. And, one of the witnesses recorded this beach incident and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around.
    1
  2946. As for the video release, Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  2947. It is blocking some of what I was posting. So, shorter version. Timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  2948. Harsh warning? For a crime? Um, no. That's not how it works. You have confused infractions and crimes. Learn the difference. Police have discretion for infractions. But, we want the courts to deal with crimes.
    1
  2949. "She was facing a year in prison and a lifetime on the sex offender registry." For this? Not likely. Even with her extensive criminal history, time served in prison around 6 years ago, and other million arrests, this incident is easily negotiated down to a minor infraction. But, of course, she'd have to show up in court for that to happen, which, of course, she didn't (seemed to be that failing to appear was her usual way of dealing with her arrests).
    1
  2950. Who? The sky? Poseidon? The aether?
    1
  2951. Well, multiple people called the police. So, there's that. Plus, well, let me just ask, if it was a man at a playground, would you go and strike up a conversation, asking him to stop? Also, did you read the police report that talked about the video taken by one of the audience? According to the arrest report, the video showed a very loud and active event in view of multiple people including children. If there was a man putting on a loud and active show at a playground in view of children, would you try talking to him during the show? Or, would you call the police?
    1
  2952.  @Grathom15  So, you don't want people arrested for aggravated misdemeanors?
    1
  2953. Wow. Pure gibberish. First of all, I don't even know the basis of this suit you encourage. What is it, exactly? And, against whom? The ether? Don't just say, "sue!!!" Tell people who you think should be involved in the suit. Secondly, this woman didn't suffer any embarrassment from the arrest video being put onto the internet, because it wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  2954. Shame on you for pointing blame at people without knowing anything.
    1
  2955. Huh? They're called "body-cams" and they're required in most places nowadays. How exactly did they kill her?
    1
  2956. From showing the video? They got money.
    1
  2957. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. (Some details that Inside Edition will never tell you, for fear that it would ruin their false narrative.)
    1
  2958. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  2959. Oh? Please elaborate. You work for the police department. It's been 2.5 years since this arrest. The woman in the video has been dead for 1.5 years, so, the investigation is long closed. You get a legal Freedom of Information Act request to release the video. Now, you have a choice: you can (a) release the video per the law, or (b) you can commit a felony and refuse to release it. Which would you choose?
    1
  2960. So, the police were supposed to just violate the Freedom of Information Act, and refuse to release the video? They already blocked its release for 2.5 years, you know. But, after she was dead 1.5 years, they can no longer block it from getting released. You do know she was long dead by the time anybody saw the video, right? Or, did your YouTube University education not tell you that?
    1
  2961. Um, ok, a couple of things wrong here. First, this is a crime, not an infraction. Police can give warnings for infractions, but, not for crimes. It doesn't work that way. Secondly, multiple people called the police for this incident. One woman took video of the event, and showed it to the police. The report says that it was certainly not the discreet act the woman says as she's trying to avoid getting arrested. Instead, they describe the video as a very loud and publicly visible act, in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  2962. Well, two things: (1) Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, because it wasn't released until 1.5 years after her death. And, (2) What happens to your suit when they say "Freedom of Information Act"?
    1
  2963. They say the same about you, and they'd be correct.
    1
  2964. Huh? Why?
    1
  2965. I think virtually all countries will arrest someone for putting on this kind of show in front of children. The police didn't shame her. The took her away from the restaurant to question her outside of view of anybody else. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years, and nobody saw it until long after she was dead.
    1
  2966. Probably not. I'm sure they (there were multiple callers) know darned well not to trust a single thing Inside Edition says.
    1
  2967. Multiple people called for this incident. One of them DID record it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. And, sorry, but with her extensive criminal background, felony term spent in prison, and a million other arrests, with open warrants, guess what? ... she was getting arrested no matter what.
    1
  2968. Multiple witnesses called. One recorded it and gave the video to the police. She admitted it while being arrested.
    1
  2969. Well, sure, once upon a time, a realtor. But, she abandoned her career and family (including a 6 month old son, and another son) more than a decade ago in order to lead a life of crime and drugs. She did a couple of years in a Florida prison back in 2018, and had a mile long arrest record before and after. According to her landlord, her new career was as a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment.
    1
  2970. The police didn't post anything. But, after 2.5 years, which was also 1.5 years after she was already dead, the police can no longer block a Freedom of Information Act request for the video.
    1
  2971. Huh? Just read the police report if you want to know who the 3 officers were. And, they never released the arrest video until 2.5 years later, long after she was dead, and that was the result of a legal FOIA request. What more do you want here?
    1
  2972. Yes, let's do away with the police altogether. If people might harm themselves when police do their jobs correctly, this means that we should not have any police at all, so criminals won't harm themselves.
    1
  2973. It's for ad revenue.
    1
  2974. Huh? How did they kill her?
    1
  2975. Um, alright. But, what exactly would the family sue for? What's the basis of any kind of claim?
    1
  2976. What isn't ethical? Putting on a show in front of children? Yeah, I agree.
    1
  2977. I don't know what you're talking about, and neither do you.
    1
  2978. A) Would you say the same if it was a man in a playground? The parents should just take their children to a different playground and let the man do his thing? B) Arrest = 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Sorry, but the arrest video had no relevance on her suicide, because nobody saw it until 1.5 years after she died. Congratulations on being EXACTLY the audience Inside Edition wants. Ignore the facts. Go on emotion. Never double check to see if what they're saying is accurate. Bravo.
    1
  2979. Yes, they did. The police didn't release the arrest video until November 24, 2023. They could no long block a FOIA request, that long after she was dead. (She died 2 years ago.)
    1
  2980. News producers watch all feeds.
    1
  2981. I've tried many times to elaborate (both yesterday, and in response to you from a few hours ago). But, it's blocking my replies. You'll have to go learn how news producers do their jobs, but, for whatever the reason, I cannot post it here.
    1
  2982. I give up. It won't let me post the details without blocking.
    1
  2983. But, they didn't. None of this was posted until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  2984. Huh? What outcome would that be?
    1
  2985. The police kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. But, eventually, when the investigation has been closed long enough, they can no longer block a legal Freedom of Information Act request. And, given that she was already dead for 1.5 of those years, yeah, they had to release the arrest video. What course would you have taken to do it differently?
    1
  2986. Huh? Were you intentionally trying to get every word wrong?
    1
  2987. She never showed up at court for this arrest. So, no, she never made it onto any such registry. Had she shown up, even with her extensive criminal history, it's very likely that this would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction.
    1
  2988. Her "job" (according to her landlord) was as a stripper at the local club. You don't lose that job for this offense. You probably get MORE fans and money.
    1
  2989. She was a convicted felon who served a term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She lost her gun rights long before. But, she managed to have a gun anyway, and used it on herself.
    1
  2990. Reputation? Huh? WHAT reputation? She was a convicted felon and drug addict who couldn't stop getting herself arrested. That WAS her reputation!!
    1
  2991. Huh? You wouldn't call in someone putting on a show in front of children? And, how did police "escalate" it?
    1
  2992. Quit making stuff up. No, you didn't. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  2993. It's blocking my replies, not sure if you saw them. Bottom line: July 1, 2022 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  2994. July 1, 2022 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released to the public.
    1
  2995. Um. OK. On what basis? What's the claim you want to make?
    1
  2996. For doing their jobs correctly?
    1
  2997. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  2998. Yes, especially because the arrest video didn't even get released until 1.5 years after she was dead.
    1
  2999. No. She suffered virtually no humiliation. As a matter of fact, given her public display (which, according to the police and the videos and witnesses, wasn't the discreet little act she's pretending when she's trying to avoid getting arrested), it seems that "shame" isn't part of her vocabulary. And, the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. So, I hardly think she suffered any shame from it.
    1
  3000. Well, at the time of her death, the medical examiner's report said that her body weighed 86 pounds, and that her implants were jutting out quite unnaturally from her emaciated body that emphasized how unhealthy she had become. I haven't seen photos of her toward her final days, but, clearly, in the year or so between this arrest video and when she committed suicide, she changed a lot, and didn't look the same.
    1
  3001. How do you shame someone who is already dead?
    1
  3002. I'm sure the people who called the police know the real story, not the 1 minute long snow job by Inside Edition.
    1
  3003. Is this a joke? You expect people to go up to someone in the middle of cranking in front of children, and have a conversation? Also, the police didn't make anything a public matter. They kept the arrest video private until 1.5 years after she was dead. You don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  3004. I wouldn't know, but, my guess would be that they're well aware never to trust Inside Edition (where facts don't matter).
    1
  3005. What charges would those be?
    1
  3006. Which "original" did you see? The video of the beach incident itself, as taken by one of the witnesses? I didn't think that was ever made public.
    1
  3007. Nope. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. The arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide, because she was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  3008. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. The arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide, because she was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  3009. Incorrect. The arrest video wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    1
  3010. Why did she commit suicide? Well, I won't pretend to know her, but, her life was in shambles for a decade. She served a prison term for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long for various things. Multiple judgements for other thefts and crimes. Drug and alcohol charges galore. Numerous open warrants for failing to appear in court. She tried to change her name to evade the police, but the courts wouldn't let her. She had left her family behind to live a life of drugs and crime about a decade ago. After she died, it took a long time before anybody even knew, because the landlord had to find her when she went looking for the overdue rent. She must not have had many friends or family, if she was left rotting away like that, with nobody looking for her. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. Neighbors said that she also did "private" cash encounters with numerous men in her apartment. I mean, again, I didn't know her, I merely read the police reports and her arrest/prison record, and the interviews with her landlord and neighbors, but, it sounds like she had a heck of a lot more problems. I'll let you decide why she killed herself.
    1
  3011. Did you look at the meta data on any posting of the arrest video before November 24, 2023? You'll see that those were "updates." The arrest video was not released until long after she was dead.
    1
  3012. This arrest was July 1, 2021. She committed suicide sometime in February or March of 2022 (unknown about exactly when, because she was discovered on March 31, but, she had been dead a while). November 24, 2023 was the release date of the arrest video due to FOIA request. If you found any article or posting before that date, you must look at the meta data and see that those were updates added later, or you can see that the website shows it was only uploaded a month or two ago, despite the date shown on the article.
    1
  3013. Well, it's pretty doubtful that this had anything to do with her suicide. I mean, why this arrest? Why not any of her other million arrests? Why not her felony prison term she served? Why not all of the drug and alcohol charges? In the bigger scheme of things, this little incident meant nothing.
    1
  3014. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. Police managed to block the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after she was already dead. What more do you want from them?
    1
  3015. First of all, the police managed to keep the arrest video from going public for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. What EXACT role do you think the police played in her suicide? Secondly, what choice do the police have, if it's the result of a legal FOIA request? What's the basis for your lawsuit? A deceptive story published by Inside Edition?
    1
  3016. The arrest video wasn't released until after she was dead for 1.5 years. There were no "consequences" because nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  3017.  @Jupi446  Yet, a simple reading through the arrest reports, and her prison history, tells you the facts. But, you'd rather believe the fantasy.
    1
  3018. Nope, the real shame is located in your mirror. You don't know anything about this incident, and shouldn't make such judgements.
    1
  3019. Haunt WHO? You say this, but you don't specify who you're talking about. And, sorry, but she seems like the wicked one here... or was that what you were saying?
    1
  3020. Really? For what?
    1
  3021. No, dewdrop. She did this to herself. She put on a public show in front of children, probably making "public beach" content for her fans at the strip club her landlord said she worked at, and got reported. Then, a year later, she committed suicide. If you think this particular arrest was the cause, then you'd have to explain why none of her other million arrests didn't cause it, and why her felony prison term 6 years ago didn't cause it...? Why THIS arrest? Because Inside Edition said so?
    1
  3022. This arrest video had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide, because it wasn't even made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead. Inside Edition will never tell you that.
    1
  3023. Um, no, unless you can actually name something they did wrong, the joke is in your mirror.
    1
  3024. Well, at least nobody shamed her while she was alive.
    1
  3025. Ooooh, strike one. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. This incident was on July 1, 2021. And, her suicide was in March of 2022. She suffered zero shame from the arrest video. Want to try again?
    1
  3026. Well, then don't worry, it wasn't the cause. This was her millionth arrest, and she had a million other bigger problems. Inside Edition went with the "innocent soccer mom gets shamed to death" angle, rather than the more accurate "convicted felon who was also a local stripper gets busted for the millionth time" story.
    1
  3027. Huh? Did you read the police report? One of the "audience" got it on video, and showed the video to the police. Why did you write this comment?
    1
  3028.  @arlonfoster9997  Welcome to Inside Edition. If you want to blindly believe stuff that is blatantly wrong, that's on you. But, don't blame ME for giving the facts. If people don't want facts given to them, then they shouldn't post their opinions in the first place.
    1
  3029.  @arlonfoster9997  Good grief. But, she DIDN'T end her life because of humiliation over it. That's my entire point. Inside Edition is perfectly happy to make deceptive videos that go viral. But, the reality is that no big social media outfits covered any of this until 1.5 years after she was dead. They didn't cause it, because she wasn't alive to see any of the social media stuff. You really have missed the entire point.
    1
  3030. And, you believe that why? Because you watched a minute long video on Inside Edition?
    1
  3031. Sorry. Your common sense failed you.
    1
  3032. Yeah, you'd think that with her mile long arrest record, and the felony prison term she had already served, she'd have learned that lesson by then. But, I suspect she probably wasn't the brightest bulb. Or, maybe all of the drugs and alcohol ruined her mind. But, anyway, just FYI: it probably wasn't going to matter at all about whether she said anything or not. One of the "audience" recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. She was getting arrested no matter what she said (or didn't say). And, if that wasn't enough, she'd have been arrested on any of her open warrants for all of her failures to appear in court.
    1
  3033. But, the arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  3034. What "backlash" do you think she suffered?
    1
  3035. Well, according to the police report, one of the women in the crowd took video with her cell phone, and showed that video to the police. The report describes it as a very loud and public display in full view of a number of people, including children. So, I kinda doubt binoculars were involved.
    1
  3036. Is that how it works? I can commit a crime and say I'm stressed, and they're supposed to let me go?
    1
  3037. OK, but, you said that they did her wrong. How?
    1
  3038. But, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. It wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then.
    1
  3039. But, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years AFTER she died. Nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  3040. Single indiscretion? Huh? So, her million other arrests and her felony term served in a Florida prison don't count? And, you do know that the video wasn't posted anywhere until long after she died, right?
    1
  3041. The police should be ashamed of the Freedom of Information Act? Huh?
    1
  3042. News producers decide what to publish.
    1
  3043. I tried elaborating, but, it's blocking everything I write.
    1
  3044. Huh? The arrest video wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she died. What embarrassment do you think she suffered from it? And, frankly, if she wasn't too embarrassed to plop down on a beach and put on a loud and graphic public display, I seriously doubt "embarrassment" was even part of her vocabulary.
    1
  3045. Huh? The woman went to the beach and put on a very loud and public show in view of multiple people including children. You're blaming the "audience"?
    1
  3046. But, she suffered near zero humiliation. She was long dead before any of the big "news" outlets covered it.
    1
  3047. Huh? Yes, that's how they handle aggravated misdemeanors. They make an arrest. What else did you expect? And, the Freedom of Information Act is what released the arrest video. What difference does it make? It wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3048. You do know that almost no media published this story until she was dead for 1.5 years, right?
    1
  3049. So, the police don't understand what you do, eh? You got your law degree from YouTube University, so, you're the expert, eh? Tell me, when did police start issuing citations for misdemeanor crimes? Can you? I always thought it was a citation for an infraction, but, that there was no such citation for this type of offense. But, you're the expert here. Please enlighten me. And, by the way, with her mile long arrest record, felony term spent in prison, and number of open warrants, I have news for you, she was getting arrested no matter what.
    1
  3050. How do you "bully" a dead person? I mean, I agree, they shouldn't really capitalize on her suicide. But, I fail to understand how it's called "bullying" when the woman is dead...?
    1
  3051. Huh? That same neighbor who accuses one of her "boyfriends" of murdering her with no valid evidence? That neighbor who blames the police for doing their jobs correctly? That neighbor?
    1
  3052. But, the bodycam video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. That's 1.5 years after she died. Nothing you're saying makes any sense.
    1
  3053. Huh? Remorse for what?
    1
  3054. And, she waited a year for this "protest"?
    1
  3055.  @firstmotorhome8024  And, the cops didn't release the video until she was already dead 1.5 years. This video is 2.5 years old. It was not made public until November 24, 2023. Freedom of Information Act. They can no longer block it from being released once the case is closed this long.
    1
  3056.  @bobfrommars5434  The neighbors didn't know anything. A couple of vague comments about a possible scuffle from a month before she was found on 3/31/22. But, the medical examiner's report says that she was last known to be alive on 3/19/22. So, that doesn't jive with any scuffle that would have been on about 2/28/22. A bunch of wild speculation from people who don't know anything is not worth reporting.
    1
  3057. Pffttt. Translation: "I've come to a public comments forum to spew my uninformed opinions around, but, I don't want anybody to ever correct me. Stop posting return comments on a public comments forum. I want to pretend to know what I'm talking about, and I don't want to be interfered with."
    1
  3058. The government doesn't hire convicted felons with a million arrests.
    1
  3059. That's what they do during all arrests.
    1
  3060. Sorry, dewdrop, but when you don't even understand the difference between a traffic infraction and a misdemeanor, forgive me if I laugh at your legal expertise.
    1
  3061. "actions were done within the nearby area visible to many people" Did you watch the entire video? I didn't see a single person in the area they questioned her. Also, are you serious? She had just plopped down in front of a group of people and put on a show. You're worried about privacy after that?
    1
  3062. "Like traffic tickets" They don't issue tickets for this misdemeanor. Learn the difference between crimes and infractions, and the different levels.
    1
  3063. "a Judge" But, dewdrop, your opening comment said that you wanted the officers to step outside and issue a fine and ban her from the beach. That's the OPPOSITE as arresting her and putting her in front of a judge. That was my exact first reply, that you were BYPASSING due process. Now you want due process? Pretending you "knew it all along" now?
    1
  3064. "Departed her house" A HOUSE? She was a strung out drug addict with a record a mile long. She hadn't lived in a house since something like 15 years ago when she walked out on her husband and two children (one was 6 months old) to live a life of crime and drugs instead. Do you know ANYTHING about this case beyond the 1 minute Inside Edition silly gibberish?
    1
  3065. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. So, how did this footage push her into anything at all, when nobody even saw it while she was alive?
    1
  3066. Well, the story is trash. But, this channel never posted a single thing about her when she was alive. So, no, they had nothing to do with her death.
    1
  3067. Liability for what? Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  3068. Not even close. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide (unknown exact date). November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public due to FOIA request.
    1
  3069. Freedom of Information Act. News outlets basically FOIA just about everything constantly, combing for stories.
    1
  3070. No. Shame on you for blaming the victims. And, sorry, but the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she was already dead. You cannot mock a dead person. It was released under the Freedom of Information Act. What kind of world do you want to live in anyway, where people who witness a crime shouldn't call the police?
    1
  3071. Pfftt. I don't think you know what her career was. And, if you believe a single word out of Inside Edition, I have a bridge to sell you. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Her career (and her life) were already over for 1.5 years before this arrest video was ever viewed by anybody in the public.
    1
  3072. Huh? Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. Plastered on the internet = December 2023.
    1
  3073. Huh? The police didn't release the video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3074.  @rutomeds  I don't even understand your comment. And, neither do you.
    1
  3075. Yes, by all means, if you see a guy cranking it in front of children at a playground, just leave him alone, else he may hurt himself a year later. And, no, dewdrop, the cops didn't do anything wrong. You don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  3076. Huh? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison about 6 years ago, and came out and had a million arrests since. Clearly getting arrested has never stopped her from repeating crimes.
    1
  3077. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. "Innocent soccer mom got caught in an embarrassing moment commits suicide due to evil police" goes viral. "Convicted felon turned stripper gets arrested for the millionth time" doesn't.
    1
  3078. Yes, she served felony time in a Florida prison. Make no mistake here. She's not the innocent soccer mom Inside Edition is portraying. She had a record a mile long in multiple states. She had multiple judgements against her for various thefts, was busted for stealing cars, numerous drug and alcohol charges, failing to appear in court numerous times, etc. She left her family including a husband and 6 month old son (and another son) around a decade ago in order to lead a "wild" and "off the rails" (the family's words) life of crime and drugs. She had little or no contact with them, and they didn't attend her funeral. She attempted to change her name a few times to evade police. But, the courts blocked that. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, her neighbors said she did "private" encounters in her apartment for cash from numerous men. I mean, I can't say for sure, but, I figure this might be why Inside Edition felt entitled to skew the story and put this woman's name out there for something so minor. Maybe the news producers have some sense of morality on some level (maybe) and figured that someone with her history was fair game. Ironically, they even portray her far better than reality. Most of all, think of this: nobody knows when she died. Why? Nobody was looking for her. She was found in her apartment only because her rent was overdue, and the landlord opened the door to find out what was going on. Her body was already into the maggot phase of decomposition, and weighed 86 pounds. She was dead for quite a while. And, yet, no family or friends even knew to look for her? Let's face it, that's because she must not have had any real relationships with anybody. Hardly the sweet soccer mom, huh?
    1
  3079. Also, please understand (if you don't already), almost no media covered any of this until long after she was dead. She's been dead for 2 years. This arrest video was released on November 24, 2023, and only after that did this whole thing go viral.
    1
  3080. Or, you could just read the arrest report, and find out that you're completely wrong.
    1
  3081. The news outlets didn't cover this story until long after she was dead.
    1
  3082. Huh? Multiple people called the police. One of them even recorded the incident on video and showed it to the police. Needless to say, they describe the video very differently than the woman described when she was attempting to avoid getting her millionth arrest. And, broadcasting her? That didn't happen until 2.5 years later, and she was already dead 1.5 of those years.
    1
  3083. Why exactly do you think she was shamed into ending her life? Because Inside Edition said so?
    1
  3084. Well, the silver lining is that she didn't live to know that her name went all over the internet.
    1
  3085. No. She took her own life for unrelated reasons.
    1
  3086. Well, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club... soooooooo......
    1
  3087. Yes, it came out a few months ago. She committed suicide more than 2 years ago. So, no, it wasn't because of this. I mean, why this arrest anyway? Why none of her other million arrests? Nice person? Felony term in a Florida prison. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. You name it. And, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash with a parade of men in her apartment. What a keeper!
    1
  3088. Two of the officers were male, dewdrop.
    1
  3089. Just read the arrest report. It's public information.
    1
  3090. Secondly, why in the world would you believe she was alone? Because she said so, as she was crying to the police about nobody being around, when she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again? See, unlike you, the police know very well that criminals will try to talk themselves out of being arrested.
    1
  3091. Third, one of the witnesses gave a copy of the video of the incident to the police. It doesn't match this version about nobody being around.
    1
  3092. Fourth, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. How do you know she wasn't creating "public" content to promote herself?
    1
  3093. First of all, this was a misdemeanor, not an infraction. What you're asking for doesn't apply to this crime. And, she did this in front of children. C'mon man.
    1
  3094. What's the basis for your suit?
    1
  3095. Well, it's doubtful she'd have to register over this anyway. Even with her extensive criminal history, this probably would get negotiated down to an infraction... if she had bothered to show up in court anyway.
    1
  3096. How would a dead person give consent?
    1
  3097. Of course they're shown. But, not during an open investigation. Most of the time, they blur the face and keep the identity private if the investigation is open, but they publish the face and identity if the investigation is closed.
    1
  3098. But, the arrest video wasn't put onto the media/internet until November 24, 2023. She died two years ago.
    1
  3099. Huh? The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. It was a documented FOIA request. Furthermore, you can use Google's advanced search algorithms to find that there were ZERO postings of the video before November 24, 2023. (Well, there were two, but, if you look inside the meta data, and read the text, you'll find that one was merely a recent update to an older posting, and the other's meta data was manipulated, because it shows a date of July 1, 2021, while simultaneously saying it was posted 2 months ago.) Anyway, no, the video was not put onto the internet before November 24, 2023. Why would you think you know otherwise? And, circle of professional peers? Is this a joke? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long. Just because Inside Edition says she was a real estate agent (a career she left behind about a decade ago, in order to live a life of drugs and crime), why would you believe it? Her landlord said that her "profession" was as a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said that she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with numerous men. So, if her "professional peers" saw this video (which they didn't, but, just hypothetically), you think they'd care, why?
    1
  3100. Well, maybe had she shown up for court, they could have negotiated this incident down to a minor infraction, and made that therapy part of the judgement. But, from the long list of open warrants, charges, etc., it seems that she stopped showing up for her court dates long before this incident.
    1
  3101. Bingo. The number of people in these comments that blindly believe trash news is absolutely stunning.
    1
  3102. Blame the police instead of the criminal? What do you think the police did wrong?
    1
  3103. What public shame do you think she really got? This video wasn't released until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3104. Well, at least it didn't go viral until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3105. Huh? They didn't broadcast anything. It was released as a result of a legal FOIA request.
    1
  3106. Well, I tend to agree. But, how can we prevent it? It's part of the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3107. "Why was her arrest was broadcasted ?" It was probably released as a result of a FOIA request. But, at least she didn't suffer at all from it. Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023. I mean, you don't actually believe a single word out of Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  3108. Quite far from it... fat anyway. I don't know about ugly, because I haven't seen photos of what she looked like right before she died. But, the medical examiner's report said that her body was 86 pounds, and that her implants were jutting out from her emaciated body in such a way that really emphasized how unhealthy she had become. Apparently, she looked very different in her final days than she looked a year prior during her arrest video.
    1
  3109. Yes. It's in the arrest report, but, the video has not been released due to content.
    1
  3110. Note: Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club. I have no knowledge about how those clubs work, but, if they keep videos of their "dancers" (and sell them), you might see something similar by tracking down which club. It's also my guess that she was making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to sob her way out of her millionth arrest. But, maybe she's done other videos and you might find them that way. I have no idea how that stuff works.
    1
  3111. Huh? You want a suit for this? What do you think the police did that you want such a suit?
    1
  3112. Lose her job? Huh? According to her landlord, she was a "dancer" (yeah, THAT kind) at the local club. You don't lose that job over this incident. And neighbors said she did "private extras" with a parade of men out of her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  3113. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = no longer alive. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA. What more do you want? What's the basis of your suit?
    1
  3114. Pray for her family? Huh? The family she abandoned about 15 years ago to live a life of crime and drugs? That family? Her husband and son didn't even go to her funeral.
    1
  3115. A) Freedom of Information Act. B) Nobody saw the video until after she was dead for 1.5 years. So, um, sorry, no.
    1
  3116. First of all, you clearly don't know the timeline. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Inside Edition never covered this story until after the arrest video was released, nor did any other major publication. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  3117. But, she wasn't humiliated. Did my first message not post correctly?
    1
  3118. Because you believe a 1 minute story told on Inside Edition?
    1
  3119. Can you name a social media outfit that even published this while she was alive?
    1
  3120. Huh? What do you know of her intent? It's my belief that she was making "public beach" content for her fans. And, with her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, and the fact that her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the adult club, I think my assumption has some pretty good odds of being right. I mean, I certainly don't base my beliefs on a deceptive Inside Edition video, do you?
    1
  3121. Really? You think they give warnings for this misdemeanor? And, what about all of her open warrants? You think they wouldn't need to take her in for those?
    1
  3122. There were multiple people who called for this incident, not just one. And, I'm pretty sure they're aware that Inside Edition is trash news, and isn't giving you the real story.
    1
  3123. Yeah, I know... being asked to read a script that essentially lies without technically telling a direct lie. Horrible job to have.
    1
  3124. Yes, one of the audience recorded it and gave the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about a quiet and discreet act with nobody around.
    1
  3125. Well, I don't know if they have any scruples at all, and they might drag anyone's name through the mud to get ad revenue. But, I'd like to think that maybe they felt that she was fair game because she had no family or friends to speak of, was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, had a million arrests, and according to her landlord and neighbors, was a stripper who also did "private" encounters in her apartment. So, by portraying her this way... "innocent soccer mom gets busted while she thought she was alone," vs. "convicted felon who can't stop getting arrested gets busted again while putting on a show in front of kids" - which goes viral?
    1
  3126. Agreed. But, the only saving grace is that it wasn't blasted on the internet until 1.5 years after she died. At least the poor woman didn't suffer any embarrassment over it. Or course, that's something that Inside Edition doesn't mention. Gotta churn out viral videos, after all.
    1
  3127. I'm not sure that I follow your wording. But, just making sure here... you do know that nobody ever saw the arrest video until 1.5 years after she died, right?
    1
  3128. But, we have this thing called the "Freedom of Information Act" that dictates that the video is public property. The police can only block its release while there's an open investigation. And, that's what they did. The video remained private for 2.5 years. But, since she was dead for 1.5 of those years, the case was closed long enough that they couldn't block its release any longer. It was released on November 24, 2023. She died in March of 2022.
    1
  3129. What you saw was a manufactured and choreographed story to get two viral rounds instead of one. She died two years ago. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. So, they aired the story while not mentioning that she was already dead. Then, they aired a second round to say that she committed suicide, falsely painting the picture that the first round of exposure caused her death, basically hoping that nobody would look up the fact that she died in March of 2022.
    1
  3130. Wow. First of all, there's no such thing as giving a ticket for crimes. You should learn the difference between a crime and an infraction. Secondly, the police WERE as discreet as possible. They quietly took her away from the restaurant, out of people's range to hear what was going on. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw this video.
    1
  3131. Um, alright. But, I guess I'm missing your point. Can you explain? What exactly is "utterly wrong" that people need to speak up about? I truly do not understand your point here.
    1
  3132. OK, nice thought, but, how do you prevent it?
    1
  3133. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3134. Huh? Yes, that was an arrest. As for suits, she's dead, you can't really launch a suit against her now.
    1
  3135. The person in the "audience" who took video of the event didn't post it online, as far as I'm aware.
    1
  3136. The sky? Poseidon? The beach? Who?
    1
  3137. And, that answers my question about the target of this suit you're asking for, how?
    1
  3138. So, you wanted the multiple people who called to NOT call? Isn't that why we pay police? To handle crimes instead of taking things into our own hands?
    1
  3139. It's standard, even mandatory in some places, to take those arrest videos.
    1
  3140. The "decision" to release the arrest video is called the Freedom of Information Act. So what? It wasn't released until long after she died.
    1
  3141. The Freedom of Information Act is what released the arrest video, not a "decision." So what? Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3142. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released to the public = November 24, 2023. Viral videos = December, 2023. She suffered nearly zero humiliation from this arrest, because nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead. And, with her mile long legal/arrest/prison history, I seriously doubt that one more arrest was going to make a bit of difference to her.
    1
  3143. A) Society has decided the laws, and society has decided you cannot do that in front of children. B) Social media had nothing to do with this incident until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3144. What's "adding up" is the ad revenue from the hits that viral videos get, for manufacturing a story via manipulating the wording to make it seem like stuff happened that didn't actually happen.
    1
  3145. OK, then you should contact your local congressional representative to get the Freedom of Information Act repealed.
    1
  3146. Read the police report. There were multiple callers. One of them even took video of the incident, and gave a copy to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around.
    1
  3147. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. They have no choice but to release the video. However, they can (and did) block its release for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. So, she suffered ZERO embarrassment from it.
    1
  3148. Well, maybe if she showed up for court, they could have mandated the counseling you're talking about.
    1
  3149. Blame who for putting what online?
    1
  3150. Make a FOIA request.
    1
  3151. I don't know it. The channel that first published it (which was in November) was deleted. But, my guess (which is worth nothing) is that it was indeed a "news" outlet that wanted to make this sort of viral video, and created a channel just to get the video out there, then deleted the channel. At least the woman didn't suffer anything from it, though. But, I feel bad that her name is dragged through this after she died.
    1
  3152. Um, no. This incident was on July 1, 2021. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023 (FOIA request). Since it was about 2.5 years since the incident, and about 1.5 years since she was alive, they could no longer block the release of the arrest video.
    1
  3153. Really? How? What rights of hers were violated?
    1
  3154. Only if you blindly trust trash TV like Inside Edition. The facts, however, say something else.
    1
  3155. Everyday citizen? Worst part of her life? So, her felony prison term wasn't the worst part of her life? The other million arrests weren't the worst part of her life? This one little insignificant arrest was the worst?
    1
  3156. Doubtful she was embarrassed by anything. You didn't trust anything you saw on Inside Edition, did you?
    1
  3157. A) Learn the difference between a crime and an infraction. B) You cannot humiliate a dead person. She was long dead before anybody saw the arrest video.
    1
  3158. The police were as discreet as possible. They quietly took her away from the restaurant, out of people's range to hear what was going on. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw this video. Sorry, but your obvious hatred is showing.
    1
  3159. Huh? First of all, multiple people reported her. One woman video recorded it, and showed the police. It's described as a very loud and public display, in full view of multiple people including children. Sorry if that version doesn't match the little discreet incident the woman is claiming when she is trying to avoid being arrested. But, hey, which do you want to believe? A crowd of people and a woman who recorded it on her cell phone? Or, the woman trying to avoid arrest? And, tell me, if it was a man at a playground, would you be saying the same? People should be ashamed to report a man at a playground in front of children? But, you got your wish anyway. She wasn't convicted. So, what's your beef? And, nobody "drove her to it" over this incident. Sorry if you believe Inside Edition. But, the arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death. Doubtful she suffered any shame whatsoever, except maybe the prior year when the arrest actually happened.
    1
  3160. When? 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was dead?
    1
  3161. Who did what which way? Your sentence means nothing.
    1
  3162. Yeah, with her long criminal history, she should know that. But, I'm betting that she knew that staying silent would mean they'd check her record for sure, and find a bunch of open warrants. Perhaps by trying to cry her way out of it, she figured there'd be a 50/50 chance of them letting her go before looking up her record.
    1
  3163. "Plastered over the news and internet" didn't happen until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then.
    1
  3164. Well, once upon a time, she was a realtor, yes. But, she hadn't sold a house in an extremely long time. It's kind of hard to get a regular job when she had a legal record a mile long, did prison time for stealing cars, judgements against her for various thefts, arrests for drugs and alcohol, many failures to appear in court, etc. She had long since abandoned her family and regular life, in favor of what her family members said was so she could go "wild" and "off the rails" (their words). And, as for her "profession," well, according to her landlord, it was one of those career paths that cannot be posted on YouTube comments, involving cash transactions with men.
    1
  3165. Except that's not true. Multiple people called the police. And, one of the "audience" took video with her cell phone, and showed it to the police. I'm sorry if that doesn't match what this woman is claiming as she's attempting to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time.
    1
  3166. Fairly? Like, what should the cops do instead of arrest her?
    1
  3167. Huh? So, the cops should kick rocks instead of doing their jobs? That's "fair" in your mind?
    1
  3168. Can you name any media that even ran a story on this before she was dead?
    1
  3169. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, um, no.
    1
  3170. The cops didn't make the arrest video public until 1.5 years after she was dead. So, no, there was no humiliation from it.
    1
  3171. Well, what you're describing works for an infraction, but, isn't the way a crime is handled. Furthermore, with all of her open warrants for all of the various failures to appear in court for her prior list of arrests, yeah, they were going to arrest her no matter what. There's no way around it.
    1
  3172. Side note: I seriously doubt her embarrassment was anything more than an act as an attempt to avoid her millionth arrest. Let's face reality here. Her landlord said that she was a stripper at the local club, so, it's pretty doubtful she feels much shame over that particular act, because that's probably part of her nightly show at work anyway. And, the witnesses of this event said that she did this in plain view of others. One even captured it on video, and showed the video to the police. It's described in their report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. I realize that it doesn't match this version she's trying to paint about a quiet and discreet act with nobody around. But, I tend to trust innocent bystanders and police, more than I trust a convicted felon who got out of prison to continue her crime spree.
    1
  3173. Um, no. Basically, Inside Edition is painting a false picture of what happened here, in order to generate ad revenue from viral videos made for people who believe every word they say.
    1
  3174. Google has a free translator.
    1
  3175. But, nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead.
    1
  3176. Huh? This video was never seen by anybody until 1.5 years after she was dead. Blurring her face wasn't going to change history.
    1
  3177. Oh, I agree. I wish the video was never shown to anybody. But, your comment was "maybe this wouldn't have happened," which makes no sense.
    1
  3178. But, your story now is different than the first posting. Your original posting talked about blurring the face to prevent suicide. The point remains, nobody saw it while she was alive, so, the face blurring wouldn't have mattered.
    1
  3179. Multiple people reported this incident. Yes, they were "at the arrest." I mean, this is all as simple as reading the police report, you know. You did that, right? You didn't just watch 1 minute on Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), and then ask a bunch of silly questions without caring about the answers, did you?
    1
  3180. Yeah, when you see a guy at the playground, cranking away in front of kids, leave him alone!!!
    1
  3181. So, when did police start giving warnings and follow up later for misdemeanor crimes like this one?
    1
  3182.  @dr_redbanRL  Monkeys also sometimes kill each other. So, we shouldn't arrest murderers?
    1
  3183. But, that would defeat the purpose of making "public beach" content.
    1
  3184. The short version is that she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had a million other arrests. Her landlord and neighbors said that she was a stripper at the local club, and that she also did "private" cash encounters out of her apartment. There were many witnesses of the incident, not just the one family mentioned here. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and gave the video to the police. It didn't match her version of being a quiet thing with nobody around. In all likelihood, she was probably making a video of herself at a public beach, but, police came, so she was trying to cry her way out of an arrest, hoping they wouldn't look her up for open warrants. And, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, and she was long dead by then, it didn't cause her suicide.
    1
  3185. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  3186. No social media plastered anything until long after she was dead. It didn't ruin her life, because (a) almost nobody knew or cared, and (b) her life was already ruined long before this incident.
    1
  3187. I confess I don't quite get it. Is that a reference to her implants?
    1
  3188. Hilarious!! She was a convicted felon who spent a term in prison about 6 years ago. She had a million arrests, both before and after. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. You name it. She abandoned her family about a decade ago, including a husband and 6 month old boy, because she preferred to live a life of crime and drugs. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions out of her house with a parade of men. Oh, but you watched a minute long Inside Edition video, so, you know better!!
    1
  3189. Multiple people called about this incident, and one caught it on video and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version about nobody being alone. To the contrary, it was a loud and public event in front of multiple people including children. Oh, but wait, she cried on video, therefore you believe her.
    1
  3190. Cops have bodycams now. That's just a fact of life.
    1
  3191. Do you really not know that cuffing is policy? The restaurant was the path to the cars. And, the arrest video wasn't seen by anybody until 2.5 years later (long after she died). What more do you want here?
    1
  3192. Huh? What exactly do you think the police did wrong? What would you have done differently?
    1
  3193. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3194. Yeah, the cop could invite the woman over to his house to meet his kids, and she could put on a show for them too. They can become lifelong friends, and build a relationship. That's the cops' job, after all, right? Befriending hardened criminals, right?
    1
  3195. Hilarious!!! It's like straight out of the plot of Robocop II.
    1
  3196. No, she didn't show up for court, and they had a hard time tracking her down because she kept trying to change her name. So, she was never convicted (of this arrest anyway). Also, it's pretty doubtful she'd have to register anything for something this minor. Even with her mile long criminal history and her felony term in prison, I'd bet this would easily be negotiated down to a minor infraction with a little community service and time with a counselor, no registered anything.
    1
  3197. Police have that kind of discretion for an infraction. For a crime, however, we don't want police playing judge and jury.
    1
  3198. Yes, this was probably the least severe of her long list of crimes. But, a crime nonetheless.
    1
  3199. Well, maybe if she had bothered to appear in court (which she didn't), they could negotiate her crime down to a minor infraction, and mandate that she get some of the help you're recommending. But, nope, like most of her other arrests, she chose not to appear.
    1
  3200. They don't release the video if there's an open investigation.
    1
  3201. July 1, 2021 = this video. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = video was released.
    1
  3202. She was dead for 1.5 years, and there wasn't an open investigation any longer.
    1
  3203. Sorry for breaking up the reply. I've tried 8 times to get it to post, and finally had to break it into pieces. It's still blocking a bunch of stuff, but, I can't figure out why, so, figure out the rest yourself.
    1
  3204. Her death is on whose hands?
    1
  3205. How many commenters here actually knew anything about this when she was alive?
    1
  3206. Well, they managed to prevent the arrest video from going public until 2.5 years later. At least that's a silver lining of sorts. At least she didn't have to suffer any public humiliation for this arrest video while she was alive.
    1
  3207. Great woman? With a felony prison term about 6 years ago? A mile long arrest record for numerous thefts, stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, failure to appear, etc.?
    1
  3208. Dewdrop, other than a couple of obscure blog posts, virtually nobody even knew anything about this arrest while she was alive. The "millions of people" didn't happen until after the arrest video was released a few months ago, on November 24, 2023. She died more than 2 years ago. So, no, there were no "millions of people" who knew anything while she was alive. And, yes, she walked out on her family and career more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in prison about 6 years ago. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. And, her neighbors said she was doing "private extras" for cash out of her apartment. Meanwhile, she racked up countless other arrests for stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, other thefts, etc. If that's not a downward spiral, what is?
    1
  3209. But, this arrest was never on YouTube before she died. Other than a couple of hundred hits on obscure blogs that nobody ever heard of (and didn't include the arrest video), nobody even knew about this arrest until long after she was already dead. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA.
    1
  3210. But, the arrest video wasn't posted anywhere until long after she was dead.
    1
  3211. I disagree. I think her suicide had nothing to do with this incident, and would have happened with or without this beach arrest.
    1
  3212. The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. They prevented its release as long as they could. But, because she was no longer alive, the investigation was closed, and they could no longer prevent Freedom of Information Act requests from releasing it.
    1
  3213.  @annabellelee4535  For an open investigation, the FOIA release is usually blocked. It's usually not until the investigation is completely closed.
    1
  3214. How do you think the police shamed her?
    1
  3215. What do you propose? It was an aggravated misdemeanor. And, she was a convicted felon with a million other arrests, and open warrants. Let her go?
    1
  3216. Huh? What does that have to do with this case?
    1
  3217. You do see the cross on her neck, right? Not good enough for you?
    1
  3218.  @ronoc9  If she was an innocent soccer mom who got caught while trying to be discreet while she thought she was isolated, there's no way she'd end up on any such list. It would be negotiated down to a minor infraction rather easily. But, given that she was a convicted felon who served a term in prison for stealing cars, and had a mile long arrest record for a bunch of different crimes, drugs and alcohol, etc., yeah, maybe. We'll never know because she never showed up in court for this arrest. But, embarrassment of telling her neighbors? Huh? They all knew she was a stripper at the local club, and suspected that she also did "one-on-one" work also. I don't think "shame" was part of her vocabulary.
    1
  3219. Well, she gave up her real estate career and her family over a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. And, this was her millionth arrest.
    1
  3220. Huh? She abandoned her family including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, more than a decade ago, to live a life of crime and drugs. She's been arrested a million times and spent a term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Failures to appear. Other thefts. You name it. It's difficult to keep a straight job with that kind of history, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. A very nice person and great citizen indeed.
    1
  3221. Why? Because Inside Edition told you that her suicide had anything to do with this arrest?
    1
  3222. Huh? She's been dead for two years. How did this video result in her death, when nobody saw it while she was alive?
    1
  3223. Hilarious!! If there wasn't anybody around, why did multiple people call the police? How did one of the "audience" capture it on video if they weren't around to see it?
    1
  3224. 1 - She dit something illegal. And, this was your edited version? How bad was the version before you edited it? 2 - Depends on your definition of "harm." And, yes, it's just like a guy at a park. 3 - Nobody is making that comparison besides you. 4 - Why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she says so while trying to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time? The video of the event, and the witnesses, do not agree with you. 5 - Freedom of Information Act. They can only stop videos from being released if there's an open investigation. But, since she was already dead for 1.5 years, they couldn't block the video from being released, because the case had been closed a long time. 6 - Yes, but, she didn't show up. She had a very long history of not showing up for court for all of her various crimes and lawsuits, etc. Even after her prison term (which was a couple of years before this arrest), she still apparently didn't learn to respect the legal process. And, sorry, I seriously doubt this woman knew what the word "shame" even meant.
    1
  3225. So, you've doubled down, and proven even more that you don't know anything?
    1
  3226. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3227. Well, then you'll be relieved to find out that she wasn't shamed to any great degree. Other than a couple hundred hits on a couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of, none of this story went anywhere until long after she was dead. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. And, no major media outlet covered it until the arrest video was released 2.5 years later. She's solely responsible for her own actions.
    1
  3228. Let me guess: call you instead?
    1
  3229. Freedom of Information Act. And, um, no. The arrest video wasn't released until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3230. That's some mighty powerful libel there. Would you care to explain why cops should be blamed for doing the jobs we hire them to do?
    1
  3231. Most police always wear the cameras. And, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she was dead.
    1
  3232. And, the Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you.
    1
  3233. Prosecuted? On what exact charges?
    1
  3234. Well, first of all, it's unlikely that this arrest had anything to do with her suicide about a year later. Secondly, how do you charge officers for performing a lawful arrest? That's what we employ officers for in the first place.
    1
  3235. Criminal negligence? Do you really think that the police recklessly caused her suicide about a year later merely by arresting her?
    1
  3236. You haven't got the slightest clue. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. And, it was released as the result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive, so, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide. And, the irony is that the police would have been committing a felony by NOT releasing the video after the case had been closed that long.
    1
  3237. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. And, it was released as the result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive, so, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide. And, the irony is that the police would have been committing a felony by NOT releasing the video after the case had been closed that long.
    1
  3238. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive, so, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide. And, you're asking the police to violate the Freedom of Information Act? What?
    1
  3239. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive, so, the arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  3240. Dewdrop, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. So, no, it didn't cause her suicide.
    1
  3241. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  3242. Freedom of Information Act, by the way. Is it really too much to ask that maybe you should know SOMETHING about a topic before you call for people's arrest?
    1
  3243. Sorry for the multiple replies. It wasn't posting for some reason, so, I kept reposting with different wording, then, it all posted at once.
    1
  3244. Yeah, they should just let criminals do anything they want, right?
    1
  3245. Yeah, sounds nice and all, but, sorry, this comment means nothing. What have YOU "judged" in this case? What EXACTLY do you think the family and police did wrong, such that you'd make this comment?
    1
  3246. If you didn't want an answer to your question, why did you ask?
    1
  3247. Huh? Nobody saw the arrest video until long after she died, so, um, no.
    1
  3248. And, what happens to your suit when the news outlets say that they never published this story until long after she was dead, and also say "Freedom of Information Act"? Then what?
    1
  3249. Blame the victim, never the criminal, right?
    1
  3250. Huh? Who was "seeking" to release this video?
    1
  3251. Huh? The police BLOCKED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, eventually, once the investigation was closed long enough, they could no longer block a FOIA request. What more do you want here?
    1
  3252. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3253. And, how do the police prevent the release of the video when they get a legal FOIA request for it?
    1
  3254. You do know that the video wasn't released until long after she was dead, right? July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023.
    1
  3255. And, why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she says so when they're questioning her, and she is trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and doesn't want to go back to prison again?
    1
  3256. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it doesn't match her version about being alone.
    1
  3257. Your photo shows you're a police officer, yet, with your experience, you believe her claims?
    1
  3258. She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and continued her life of drugs and crime right where she left off, with a million arrests. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear. Etc. With that record, you do know it's not easy to get a straight job, so, you do know her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right? How do you know she wasn't making "public beach" content, and was just trying to whine her way out of being arrested before they looked her up?
    1
  3259. This WASN'T the cause of her suicide. And, as I stated, the arrest video wasn't even released until she was already dead for 1.5 years. You aren't proposing anything about how to change the Freedom of Information Act, you're just saying "it would be nice if...." If there's a lesson to be learned here, it's that Inside Edition doesn't care one bit about facts, and will manipulate any story they feel will get ad revenue.
    1
  3260. Oh? And, you'd know this, how? One of the "audience" members who took video of the incident itself (and turned that video over to the police) disagrees with you, as did the officer who reviewed the video. But, I guess you know better, right?
    1
  3261. Huh? You think this incident had anything to do with her decision a year later? Tell me, when she was serving her felony term in prison 6 years ago, why didn't she make that same decision then? How about her million other arrests? None of those caused that decision either. Stealing cars? Other thefts? Repeated drug and alcohol charges? And, what choice did they have? With all of her open warrants, they couldn't just ignore the new offense. And, if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans at the "dance club" (yeah, that kind) where she worked, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  3262. Public shame? What? She was doing this thing almost undoubtedly as public beach content for her fans. You do know she worked as a "dancer" and her neighbors said she did "private extras" for parades of paying men in her apartment, right? And, the arrest video was not seen by anybody until 2.5 years later (long after she was gone).
    1
  3263. Why would you believe a single thing this woman says? Why?
    1
  3264. Only if you buy silly Inside Edition stories, where facts don't matter.
    1
  3265. Huh? Two white cops and one black? What?
    1
  3266. That's some mighty slander/libel you're asserting. Why do you know this? Because you watched a 1 minute Inside Edition video?
    1
  3267. You think they have discretion for an aggravated misdemeanor? Um, no. You don't know the difference between and infraction and a crime.
    1
  3268. And, your sister wouldn't arrest someone for a misdemeanor crime performed in front of children? Right. Sure.
    1
  3269. Not even close. Stop believing Inside Edition. It's trash news.
    1
  3270. I'm sure the people who reported her feel just fine, because they probably know that this Inside Edition story is massively inaccurate and deceptive (unlike you, who eats it up like Christmas dinner).
    1
  3271. Huh? You believe she committed suicide over a lack of empathy?
    1
  3272. So, we should blame the victim, in your mind, rather than the criminal herself?
    1
  3273. 1) All arrests include cuffs. It's standard mandatory procedure. 2) The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, as a result of a legal FOIA request. She was dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the video.
    1
  3274. You never saw the arrest video while she was alive. It was kept private for 2.5 years. Arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023. What you saw was the artificial manufacture of a viral story. After the case was closed long enough, the police can no longer block a legal FOIA request for the video. So, press showed the video in late November, 2023, and didn't mention that she was already dead. Then, a few weeks later, they showed the video again with the "update" that she was dead, making people react like you just did, thinking this was a recent thing, caused by public shame. The reality is that, while she was alive, only one obscure article on a website I've never heard of posted a blog about this arrest. It didn't have the video, and wasn't read by very many people. Sorry, you've been manipulated in the interest of ad revenue.
    1
  3275. Is that how that's supposed to work? Someone does a FOIA request for the arrest video, and the police say, "nope, sorry, we can't release it until we have the client list of Epstein"?
    1
  3276. Huh? No social media even touched this story until 1.5 years after she was dead. How'd they "take another life"?
    1
  3277. Wrong. One obscure website posted a small article. But, no social media outfits covered any of this until the arrest video was released.
    1
  3278. You clearly don't know the difference between an infraction and a crime. Infraction = warning. Crime = arrest.
    1
  3279. Huh? With her mile long arrest record, time served in prison for stealing cars, numerous charges for drugs and alcohol, multiple judgements against her for theft, open arrest warrants for repeatedly failing to appear in court, etc., yeah, I think she knew the laws a heck of a lot better than you.
    1
  3280. SECOND chance? SECOND? Good grief. She was on her millionth chance.
    1
  3281. OK, but, one of the "audience" recorded it and showed it to the police. She was getting arrested either way.
    1
  3282. Get real here. One of those acts is extremely difficult to prove in a lot of circumstances, and the other one was very provable because she admitted it, and they also had video from one of the "audience."
    1
  3283. But, none of this was on any social media until long AFTER she died.
    1
  3284. And stealing cars. And drugs and alcohol. And, trying to change her name to evade the police. And, abandoning her family to live a life of crime. And, and, and....
    1
  3285. No, but, what I do know is that 84% of the population blindly swallows anything they're told. You're one of them.
    1
  3286. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  3287. Guilt? Why? I mean, yeah, I'd hope they feel some guilt over making stories like this, that paint an incorrect picture of what happened here. But, make no mistake about it, this arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide. It wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3288.  @goov47  What? The video wasn't "out" until 1.5 years AFTER she died.
    1
  3289. And, you believe her when she said she thought she was alone, why? Because that's what she said as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest?
    1
  3290. Yeah, and why do doctors waste their time on treating asthma, and treating gall bladder problems, while cancer still exists? Until cancer is cured, no doctor should deal with any other issues.
    1
  3291. Accountable for what?
    1
  3292. Huh? What do you think they did to humiliate her? They arrested her, sure. But, how would this work, in your mind? Cops shouldn't arrest anybody for fear that the might commit suicide? Also, with her mile long arrest record, and time served in prison, etc., what was so special about THIS arrest that she killed herself about a year later?
    1
  3293. Huh? How exactly did they humiliate her in this arrest, such that, about a year later, she committed suicide over this arrest? Why this arrest, and not her other million arrests?
    1
  3294. Huh? Where'd you get that idea? What did they do to make you come to that conclusion? They had no choice. She was going to get arrested either way, either under this misdemeanor, or because of her long list of open warrants.
    1
  3295. Or, you could stop blindly trusting tabloid journalism like Inside Edition, and go read the real story of what happened here.
    1
  3296. So, you acknowledge that the news covered this AFTER her suicide. Now, you're blaming them for the suicide? How does that even make sense?
    1
  3297. Well, at least she wasn't "on blast" until long after she was dead.
    1
  3298. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3299. Well, probably as a result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request. They can only keep it private for so long, you know. In this case, they kept it private for 2.5 years. That means that the woman was already dead for 1.5 years before the bodycam footage was released. I mean, you don't just swallow the garbage you see on Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  3300. Because that's what Inside Edition told you.
    1
  3301. But, none of this incident was ever on YouTube until long after she was dead.
    1
  3302. The reason was the Freedom of Information Act. What reason did you think?
    1
  3303. At least nobody saw the arrest video until long after she was dead. It's a minor saving grace, but, trying to make a silver lining of sorts.
    1
  3304. "or a warning couldve been more appropriate" A warning for a misdemeanor? Huh? And, with her prior record and open warrants, what choice did the cops have anyway? Even if they ignored this particular misdemeanor, they'd still need to arrest her.
    1
  3305. "Thinking she alone" Why would you believe that? Because she says so? Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (ya know, one of those kinds), and, with her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, etc., I find it a lot more likely that she was making "public beach" content. Witnesses said she walked up and down the beach a few times, and then found a spot with people nearby.
    1
  3306. "minding there business" You cannot even spell it, let alone express a coherent thought about it. Yes, dewdrop. We have police for a reason. That's their job. And, if you witness a crime, you should call the police. But, in your world, you'd just leave a man to crank at the playground in front of kids without calling? Is that what you're saying?
    1
  3307. Well, Inside Edition, like virtually all of the media outlets, never aired a single thing about this story until 1.5 years after she died. So, no, they had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  3308. "What a waist of a life!" Well, if it matters to you, her waist shrunk dramatically between this arrest and her suicide the next year. The medical examiner's report said that she weighed 86 pounds, and that's including the implants. Or, were you trying to say "waste"? The video ended up public due to the Freedom of Information Act. But, it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was dead. So, um, no, it had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  3309. I don't know that her motivation was "mundane." She basically ruined her life a long time ago, leaving her career and family behind to live a life of crime and drugs. After a million arrests, a felony prison term about 6 years ago, and with the charges continuing to pile up, yeah, I imagine she probably felt a lot of stress.
    1
  3310. You think that little obscure Smoking Gun article was too embarrassing for her?
    1
  3311. Yes, that's what happened. The arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then.
    1
  3312. Oh, with your obvious legal expertise, maybe you can answer a few questions for me, then. Will you? When did the police start issuing citations for crimes? I thought citations were only for infractions, not for crimes? With your legal expertise, perhaps you can point me to some examples of police issuing citations for crimes, can you? And, my next question is related to how the police ruined her life. Since the police kept the video private for 2.5 years, and it wasn't released to the public until 1.5 years after she died, perhaps you can explain to me how the police ruined her life, will you? It seems to me that the police did the right thing, and didn't release the video until quite a long time after the case was closed, and she was dead, and when they did release it, it was probably because of a Freedom of Information Act request. But, you're the legal expert here, not me, so, can you explain it instead of me making bad assumptions? And, as for not knowing kids were around, well, the police were called by multiple people, and one woman even recorded the incident with her cell phone. The police saw the video and said in their report that it was a very loud and public display, in view of multiple people, including children. What do you know that the police didn't know? Can you enlighten me? Why do you believe what you believe? Who told you? The woman who didn't want to be arrested? And, my last question relates to how to handle the case better. You even capitalized it. But, you didn't say how. Can you educate a guy like me, who knows nothing about the law or police procedures, and tell me how it could have been handled better?
    1
  3313. Who did? And how?
    1
  3314. Who is "they"?
    1
  3315. Restaurant admin? So, it's their fault that the criminal went to that restaurant after she put on a show at the public beach?
    1
  3316. Those who called the cops? So, in your mind, people shouldn't call the police when they see a crime?
    1
  3317. Dewdrop, the Freedom of Information Act is what caused the release of the video. The police can block the release for an open investigation (which they did block, for 2.5 years). But, after she was dead, there was no reason to block the release.
    1
  3318. Wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" captured it on video. Needless to say, it didn't match this version she's telling while trying to avoid her millionth arrest. And, if they didn't arrest her for that particular act, they'd have arrested her for her open warrants.
    1
  3319. Which media, and how?
    1
  3320. On what basis?
    1
  3321. She was married. She left that life (and two sons) behind because the party life was more important.
    1
  3322. On what basis? For performing an arrest?
    1
  3323. Huh? I'd say she ruined her career a decade ago when she abandoned her job of selling homes (and her family) to go lead a life of crime and drugs. About 7 years ago, she spent felony time in a Florida prison. She got out, and continued her drug and crime spree, resulting in an arrest record a mile long. There were multiple judgements against her for various thefts. And, yeah, it is kind of difficult to get a straight job after all of that, so, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" encounters in her apartment with numerous men. So, I seriously doubt this episode ruined her career. For all I know, maybe she was making a "public" video to PROMOTE her career? After all, the video taken by one of the witnesses doesn't match the version she tells about a discreet act with nobody around. Quite the contrary.
    1
  3324. Who? And, on the basis of what?
    1
  3325. With multiple people reporting, and a video of the incident itself, and a million open warrants for prior arrests, if you actually believe that the cop shouldn't have arrested her, you know nothing.
    1
  3326. I'm sure the feeling is mutual.
    1
  3327. Multiple people called the police. One of them said the woman went up and down the beach, looking for a spot, and [seemingly] deliberately plopped down in front of people. One witness took video, and showed the video to the police, who described it as a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. Doesn't sound too private to me.
    1
  3328. Huh? What shame did she experience before she died? A couple of blog posts?
    1
  3329. Why? According to her landlord and neighbors, she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) who also did "private extras" with parades of men in her apartment. She was most likely making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest. The photo probably helped her business. And, there's no legal requirement to blur anything.
    1
  3330. Huh? On what grounds? What's your claim?
    1
  3331. They didn't say what happened because they wanted to get two viral rounds out of it for the price of one. So, they came out with the "news" of the 2021 incident first in November of 2023. She was already long gone for a year and a half by then. But, they didn't reveal that. So, they could come back and announce a few weeks later that she was gone, thus producing a second viral video with the "updated information" (even though they already knew the outcome). But, fear not, the release of the video had absolutely nothing to do with it. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3332. This incident = July 1, 2021. She departed the world = February or March of 2022 (exact date unknown). The video of the arrest was released November 24, 2023. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3333. But, she didn't harm herself because of this video. Nobody saw the video until 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  3334. Because this particular offense is a misdemeanor crime, not an infraction. For an infraction, speeding, parking illegally, fishing without a license, letting your grass grow too tall, police have the discretion to give a warning or a ticket. For a misdemeanor crime, the public has decided that we don't want police to play judge and jury, and we want them to simply perform the arrest and let the courts take it from there. Also, c'mon man, she was a convicted felon who served time in prison. She had an arrest record a mile long, because even after prison, she refused to stop committing crimes. There were numerous warrants for her arrest for failing to appear in court for prior arrests. But, you want them to just let her go? And, despite her claims of a discreet act with nobody around, sorry, but one of the witnesses recorded it, and the video doesn't match her innocent claims.
    1
  3335. Huh? You're not talking about the convicted felon with the mile long arrest record, who chose to put on a public display in front of children... you're talking about someone else?
    1
  3336. Well, given that her arrest video was released 2.5 years afterward, and she was long dead by the time anybody ever saw the arrest video, and the arrest itself received nearly zero publicity while she was alive, I find your claim rather dubious.
    1
  3337. Conclusion first, ask questions second. You're really honest.
    1
  3338. Yes, well, in the USA, there is the Freedom of Information Act, which is not the same as wherever you live.
    1
  3339. I seriously doubt "shame" was part of her vocabulary. One of the witnesses said that the woman walked up and down the beach, looking for a place, and then plopped right down in front of people, including children. One of the "audience" even got it on video and showed the police. She didn't seem too ashamed about her mile long arrest and prison record from before this incident, doubtful she felt much shame for yet another arrest... especially given that nobody ever saw the arrest video until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3340. Putting on a show at a public beach in front of children is a misdemeanor. But, don't worry anyway, this arrest had nothing to do with her suicide a year later. You really shouldn't trust Inside Edition, you know.
    1
  3341. Well, you might be relieved to learn that the release of the arrest video had absolutely no impact on her suicide. The timeline that Inside Edition will never tell you: Arrest = July 2021. Suicide = March 2022. Arrest video made public = November 2023.
    1
  3342. Or, you could simply read the arrest report, and see that one of the callers for this incident recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children.
    1
  3343. Huh? You don't think people should be arrested for this crime? Why not?
    1
  3344. Huh? What media caused what exactly?
    1
  3345. Freedom of Information Act. But, the saving grace is that at least the arrest video wasn't public until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3346. Yes, a couple of obscure sites had blog entries about the arrest. But, nobody had the arrest video until November 24, 2023. The "Chokerclub" article you mentioned was simply wrong.
    1
  3347. Long before this incident, she had already been trying to change her name (to evade the police). But, with her felony prison term for stealing cars, and her mile long arrest record for various other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear in court, etc., the government wouldn't allow her to change her name.
    1
  3348. You do see that cross on her neck, right?
    1
  3349. OK, but, how can you prevent it?
    1
  3350. And you got your law degree from where?
    1
  3351. What's that? YouTube is My University? Good grief.
    1
  3352. But, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead. And, no social media covered it until then.
    1
  3353. Another proud YouTube University attorney. Tell me, when did they start issuing tickets for a crime? I thought you get a ticket for an infraction.
    1
  3354. It's not that difficult to understand. Inside Edition is carefully crafting the story to make you come to the wrong conclusions. The reality is that this arrest was July 1, 2021. Her suicide was March, 2022. The arrest video was made public on November 24, 2023. Freedom of Information Act. The cops can no longer block legal FOIA requests after a case has been closed for long enough. And, yeah, since the arrest was 2.5 years ago, and she was already dead for 1.5 years, the cops can't block the release any longer. Welcome to Inside Edition, trash news.
    1
  3355. That's some mighty impressive slander there. Any evidence? The medical examiner's report doesn't say a single word about any missing organs (and, yes, the report would say that if it were true).
    1
  3356. "Defamation" would mean that they said something not true. "Wrongful death" would mean that they somehow caused it. They didn't. Sorry, but, by your "logic," we should never arrest people when they commit crimes. And, this arrest was nothing in the bigger scheme of things anyway (like you said). This woman had already trashed her reputation with her other million arrests and the term she served in prison. One more arrest wasn't going to make a bit of difference. And, she wasn't shamed by this incident anyway. It received near-zero press until after she was dead.
    1
  3357. Blame the victims? Blame the police? How about blaming the criminal?
    1
  3358. Here's a hint in life: these "news" (not news) outlets get paid by ad revenue, and they want lots of videos to go viral. But, sometimes, giving the straight story doesn't make that happen. So, to make a viral video, they use creative wording to modify the message. Like, they say, "Was she shamed into suicide? That's what everyone is asking." But, they never answered. Instead, they want you to think the question IS the answer. But, the actual answer is no. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. When they don't answer their own questions, you're being manipulated.
    1
  3359. Who do you think shamed her, and how?
    1
  3360. Huh? You don't consider this story to be fake news? "Innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police, kills herself as a result"? Yet, the real story is, "convicted felon who cannot stop getting arrested, gets arrested for the millionth time, and kills herself a year later for unrelated reasons."
    1
  3361. Sorry, but she suffered nearly zero humiliation, despite the false picture Inside Edition attempts to paint.
    1
  3362. Well, other issues, sure, definitely. But, committed suicide over this? Naw, that's just Inside Edition being Inside Edition, painting a false narrative.
    1
  3363. She committed a misdemeanor crime. What else do you expect to happen, other than an arrest? There were multiple complaint calls. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her version about nobody being around, quite to the contrary, it was in front of multiple people including children. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison around 6 years ago, and had a million other arrests before and after that, including failures to appear in court (resulting in open warrants). Do you REALLY believe they weren't going to arrest her? Even without all of that, police don't have that kind of discretion for a crime. You seem to have confused it with an infraction.
    1
  3364. And, "news and police"? What do you think they did to cause her suicide? The arrest video was kept out of the public's eye until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. News didn't cover anything until long after she was dead. Other than a couple of obscure blogs I've never even heard of, I don't think any news station even knew her name until long after she died.
    1
  3365. For an infraction, there is discretion and leeway. For a crime, we don't want police to play judge and jury. Why? Because with civilized countries, we don't put that power into a single person's hands, and we have this thing called "due process."
    1
  3366. As for your comments that this video's existence represents a decline, we definitely agree. It's ridiculous to drag this woman through the mud after she is dead, just for the sake of making a viral video that gets ad hits.
    1
  3367. I notice you refused to answer about the fact that the arrest video wasn't released until after she was dead for 1.5 years. You'll spew a bunch of complete nonsense about stuff you don't even come close to understanding. But, that fact... you won't even touch. Your original assertion was WRONG. The police handled this arrest perfectly. And, the truth is that her suicide had nothing to do with this arrest. I'm sorry you believe Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), but, that's really your own fault.
    1
  3368. Great job avoiding the timeline, dewdrop. It ruins your false narrative. But, you refuse to touch it.
    1
  3369. As for sources, Inside Edition and YouTube block me from writing too much about outside sources. But, start with the police report from this arrest, the medical examiner's report, her arrest history, the legal FOIA request, and interviews with her family and neighbors.
    1
  3370. And, quit up-thumbing your own comments, dewdrop. It's silly.
    1
  3371. Open investigations vs. closed.
    1
  3372. Well, that's a nice sentiment. But, this was hardly her worst moment. This was just a drop in the bucket. She had been arrested a million times before, and even served a felony prison term.
    1
  3373. I don't understand. What didn't she "deserve"? She committed suicide. Nobody did anything "to" her.
    1
  3374. 1) Society determines this, not you. What the kids do or don't know about their parents in a bedroom has absolutely no bearing on whether society has determined that this activity is acceptable in public.
    1
  3375. 2) You believe her when she claims she didn't think anybody was around? Why? Do you believe every criminal who says "I didn't do it"? One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about a discreet and private act with nobody around (her claim as she's attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest). To the contrary, it was a loud and visible act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  3376. 3) Your comment about somehow she wasn't "innocent until proven guilty" is hogwash. The police don't "prove" anything by making an arrest. It's up to the prosecutors to prove things. By your standard, police could never arrest anybody.
    1
  3377. 4) The parents were not the only ones to call, dewdrop. The woman was putting on a public show, apparently thinking she was at work, when she was actually at a public beach, and multiple people called. (You do know her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club, right?)
    1
  3378. 5) There were virtually zero "social media" ramifications here, dewdrop. Other than a couple of obscure blog posts on a couple of sites nobody has ever heard of, no news station covered this story until after the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She was long dead by then.
    1
  3379. 6) I notice you didn't once mention her own responsibility. Not once. In your world, apparently, there is no accountability for a person's own actions. It's everyone else's fault she put on a show at a public beach, and got reported. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat. She was a convicted felon who spent a term in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests for various things. I'll stick with the words of the innocent bystanders and police before I'd trust a single thing out of her. But, not you, though. You believe everything you see, and don't hold her responsible for her own behavior.
    1
  3380. Hilarious!! Another proud graduate of YouTube University Law School, eh? The bodycam footage wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead, dewdrop. And, what do you propose? Repeal the Freedom of Information Act? The cops successfully blocked the release of the bodycam footage for 2.5 years. But after she was dead 1.5 years, you can't keep blocking a FOIA request.
    1
  3381. Also, sorry if you don't understand that cuffing is part of standard procedure. But, with her mile long legal history, felony prison term, etc., numerous arrests, etc., I hardly think she'd be bothered by them at that point.
    1
  3382. Freedom of Information Act. The media can get just about any arrest video for any investigation that's been closed long enough. And, given that it was 2.5 years later, and she was dead for 1.5 years, what choice did the police have but to release the video?
    1
  3383. The Freedom of Information Act also reveals what they have on file.
    1
  3384. Who is "they"? Huh?
    1
  3385. Huh? But, news and YouTube never covered anything about this until long after she was dead.
    1
  3386. Dewdrop, the police prevented the release of this video for 2.5 years. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released (due to legal FOIA request). What more do you want?
    1
  3387. So, you're saying that the police aren't trained to do their jobs correctly, while simultaneously saying that they should first take her to the police station without arresting her? It doesn't work that way. What type of police training have you had that supports what you said? And, what way should it have been handled that you and the neighbor believe?
    1
  3388. First of all, you clearly do not understand the difference between an infraction and a crime.
    1
  3389. Infraction = stuff like speeding, parking in a handicap zone, fishing without a license, etc. Cops can use discretion. Crime = arrest the person and let the courts handle it.
    1
  3390. I'd explain crime vs. infraction more, but, I've tried to reply a dozen times, and it's blocking me, so I have to divide my reply into pieces.
    1
  3391. You don't get a warning for a crime.
    1
  3392. Secondly, so, in your world, people shouldn't be arrested for a crime if the person feels terrible?
    1
  3393. Third, she didn't end her life until 9 months later. And, it probably had nothing to do with this arrest. She didn't end her life for any of her other million arrests. What's so special about this one? Had she appeared in court, even as a convicted felon who already served a term in prison, they'd likely have just negotiated it down to a minor infraction, get some counseling, do some community service, and it's over. But, failing to appear in court seemed to be the way she chose to handle all of her arrests, given her number of open warrants to failing to appear. She faced a mountain of charges in the past decade that were more serious than this one, and didn't commit suicide. But, you're saying she'd commit suicide for this little one? You do know that none of this went viral until long after she was dead, right?
    1
  3394.  @TourettesMajestic  Freedom of Information Act. But, it wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    1
  3395. Sorry, but every sentence you wrote was wrong. Multiple witnesses saw this, and called the police, not just one family. They said that she did it intentionally, and, one of the witnesses even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. The video doesn't match the woman's version about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a loud and visible act in front of multiple people including children. With her mile long arrest record, and felony prison term she served, yeah, it probably wasn't easy to get straight work. So, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Now, I wouldn't know, but, I wouldn't be surprised if she did this thing on the beach to promote herself. There's a large audience for doing that stuff in public and recording it. And, by the way, this arrest was on July 1, 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. Freedom of Information Act. So, your suit has ZERO merit. But, hey, keep on pretending to know things you don't, ok?
    1
  3396. This made no headlines until long after she was dead.
    1
  3397. Jail? On what charge exactly?
    1
  3398. Yeah! When you see a guy at the playground cranking in front of kids, leave him alone!!
    1
  3399. Wouldn't have mattered. Multiple people called the police. One even caught it on video and showed it to the police.
    1
  3400. Well, it wasn't made public until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3401. So, your solution is NOT to arrest criminals? Huh? What do you propose instead? And, if you were correct, why didn't any of her other million arrests (or her felony term in a Florida prison) make her do it? What was special about this particular arrest?
    1
  3402. Huh? Officers aren't judge and jury. It's up to the courts to do what you're saying. Officers establish probable cause, and that's where their responsibility ends.
    1
  3403. Good grief. You have no understanding of the topic. Stop pretending you do.
    1
  3404. It doesn't work that way. Good grief.
    1
  3405. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request. So, um, no, you don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  3406. Huh? Right out of the gate, her career was over? Why? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. She definitely wouldn't lose business for this arrest. And, her police record was already a mile long. Felony prison term for stealing cars. A million arrests for other stuff. Drugs and alcohol. Failure to appear in court. Various judgements against her for theft. What is it about THIS charge that would be all that different than all of the rest of her charges?
    1
  3407. Well, dewdrop, she also had an arrest and legal record a mile long. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison for stealing cars. She had multiple arrests for drugs and alcohol. She had multiple judgements against her for various thefts. She had numerous failures to appear in court. Her landlord said that her "profession" was, well, ya know, one of those words that gets banned from YouTube comments, and involves lots of cash transactions with men. Yet, you blindly believe her? Why?
    1
  3408. 1) You don't know the difference between an infraction and a crime. Stop pretending you're a YouTube attorney. 2) The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3409. Well, she's got that cross on her chest in this video. But, maybe you were thinking of Poseidon?
    1
  3410. Yeah, if you don't have righteousness, Poseidon won't be happy.
    1
  3411. So, she has the Jesus cross, but, that's not good enough for Jesus?
    1
  3412. That answers nothing. She has a cross on her chest. Is that not good enough for Jesus?
    1
  3413. Because YOUR version is the correct one.
    1
  3414. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  3415. Your negative attitude is tiresome and offensive. Every single one of you pretend YOU know the right way, even if it differs from what other people say in your very same religion. Some say works don't matter, only faith does. Others say works do matter. 66 books vs. 81 books vs. 88 books, none of you can agree on anything. But, you all think you know enough to declare when a person isn't good enough for your club (as you've said about the woman in this video).
    1
  3416. But, the humiliation had nothing to do with the suicide. It was about a year later that she killed herself. And, it wasn't until about 1.5 years after that when the video was released to the public. And, sorry, but, if the woman wasn't "humiliated" by dropping down on a beach, spreading, and making a bunch of noise in front of a family, I seriously doubt that being arrested would make much of a difference for her. It wasn't her first arrest, after all.
    1
  3417. Well, you didn't trust Inside Edition to tell an accurate story, did you?
    1
  3418. If it was a man at a playground, would you be saying to leave him alone?
    1
  3419. Do you even know the difference between an infraction and a crime? Do you know what the evidence was?
    1
  3420. This arrest was July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. And, the arrest video was released to the public due to legal FOIA request on November 24, 2023.
    1
  3421. Well, that's one way to demonstrate that you have no idea what you're talking about. I'll divide my response into pieces, otherwise it'll probably get blocked.
    1
  3422. 1) Young professional? She walked out on her career and family over a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She has an arrest record a mile long, did a felony stint in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. And, according to her landlord, her "profession" was as a dancer (um, yeah, that kind) at the local club. And, her neighbors say she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment.
    1
  3423. 2) The police were completely professional. Why would you say otherwise?
    1
  3424. 3) She had no defense attorney, because, as usual for her, she ditched and never showed up in court for this arrest. No surprise, because it seemed to be her regular pattern.
    1
  3425. 4) The arrest video wasn't released until long after she was no longer alive. July 1, 2021 = this incident. March, 2022 = no longer alive. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released as the result of a legal FOIA request. The police prevented the release of the video for as long as they legally could.
    1
  3426. 5) You're worried that her image was everywhere? Huh? First of all, she hadn't sold a house in over a decade. Secondly, with all of her prior arrests, convictions, judgements against her, etc., her image was already out there.
    1
  3427. 6) You want a suit over this? OK, what do you think happens to your suit when the police simply reply that they had no choice but to conform to the legal FOIA request? And, like I said, the arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, what do you think comes of this suit you want?
    1
  3428. If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported and tried to cry her way out of trouble, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  3429. Oh, and by the way, why do you think her name and reputation was all that important to her? She had been trying to change her name to duck the law for a while, you know. But, the legal system wouldn't let her, due to her extensive criminal history. Stealing cars, failures to appear, all kinds of drug and alcohol charges, multiple judgements for other thefts, etc. She abandoned her husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, to live an "off the rails" life (her own family's words). You think she was worried about her reputation at that point? I think she was a drug addled "dancer" (ya know) making "public" content for fans. But, you watched a minute long video on Inside Edition (where facts don't matter), so, that's what you blindly believed, right?
    1
  3430. Who is "they" in your statement?
    1
  3431. No. By the time of this arrest, she already had a mile long arrest/prison/legal history for drugs and alcohol, theft, served time for stealing cars, etc. Her family said she had gone "wild" and "off the rails" long before this arrest. And, her real estate career was long over, and she hadn't sold a house in a very long time.
    1
  3432. So, you actually believe this ridiculous story? Good grief. No, she wasn't trashed across social media until long after she was dead. And, if she didn't end her life over any of her other million arrests, nor her felony prison term 6 years ago, why would she do that for this insignificant arrest?
    1
  3433. 1) Multiple people called about this incident. The witnesses said that the woman intentionally picked a spot in view of others. One witness recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people, including children.
    1
  3434. 2) Get real here. Nobody is going up to a man at a playground in the middle of cranking in front of children to have a conversation. Nor would anybody do that with a woman on a beach.
    1
  3435. 3) No social media even covered this event until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. Prior to then, there were a couple of obscure websites that had an article or blog, but, that's about it. She suffered virtually zero shame or humiliation from this arrest, because she died 2 years ago, long before any social media even knew her name.
    1
  3436. 4) Even with her felony prison term for stealing cars, and her mile long arrest record for other stuff, it's still very unlikely that she'd need to register on any list for this incident. This would probably very easily be negotiated down to a minor infraction, do a little community service, see a counselor, and it's over. But, she never showed up in court for this arrest (seemed to be the trend with her, given the number of open warrants for failure to appear in her other open arrests).
    1
  3437. 5) Reputation? Oh, that's a good one. Pure comedy gold. Her landlord says she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors say that she did "private" encounters for cash out of her apartment with numerous men. Reputation, indeed.
    1
  3438. I never said a single thing about spelling or grammar to you. But, THAT is your reply? Did you bother reading anything I wrote?
    1
  3439. Why do you believe that? Because Inside Edition told you to believe it?
    1
  3440.  @TylerBigHead  Well, you did say "if," which is fair enough. But the "if" is not correct. Of course people were around.
    1
  3441. Well, if she had shown up for court, maybe they'd have been able to mandate that counseling you're asking for. But, it seems that showing up for court wasn't her thing, based on all of the failures to appear on her million other arrests.
    1
  3442. How did this become about ME? A convicted felon who spent time in prison, and had a million other arrests, decided to put on a public show at the beach, and got arrested. A year later, she committed suicide, and Inside Edition decided to try to make money by manipulating the story. What do I have to do with any of it?
    1
  3443. Can you name any social media that posted anything about this story while she was alive?
    1
  3444. Why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she says so as she's attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest?
    1
  3445. You want a suit? On what grounds? What case do you think you have? The Freedom of Information Act required them to release the arrest video once the case was closed long enough.
    1
  3446. Yeah, but, according to the medical examiner's report, her body weighed 86 pounds and her implants were jutting out from her emaciated skin in such an unnatural way that it demonstrated how unhealthy she was when she died. Apparently, she went even further downhill in the many months between this incident and when she died. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but, I haven't seen photos of her as she got closer to the end. At 86 pounds, though, I'm guessing not so much of a scorcher any longer.
    1
  3447. The police took her away from the restaurant to question her, so nobody could see or hear what was going on. They then didn't release the arrest video for 2.5 years, so, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. What more do you want from them?
    1
  3448. No, the "news" (not news) story asks that question about whether this led to a downward spiral, but never provides the answer. The answer is "no." The downward spiral started many years before. She abandoned her family (including a 6 month old baby boy) to go lead a "wild" and "off the rails" life (her own family's words). She served felony prison time for stealing cars. She had an arrest record a mile long. Drug and alcohol problems galore. Multiple judgements against her for theft. Numerous failures to appear in court. Etc. And, yeah, it's tough to get a decent job after all of that, so, as her landlord says, her profession was, well, one of those words you can't write in YouTube comments... ya know... one of those careers that involves cash transactions with lots of men. And, as for this incident, according to witnesses, she was wandering up and down the beach looking for a spot, and seemingly intentionally chose to plop down in front of people to put on this show. One of the "audience" recorded it and showed the video to the police, who then described it as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Sorry, I don't think "shame" was even in this woman's vocabulary, until she had to put on a little act to try to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  3449. So, you want a suit on the basis of cops wearing bodycams (required in most places nowadays)? And, the Freedom of Information Act means absolutely nothing to you?
    1
  3450. Huh? The video of the incident taken by one of the "audience" doesn't lie, even though the woman does lie. It wasn't a quiet act with nobody around. It was a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  3451. For an aggravated misdemeanor? To a convicted felon with a million other arrests?
    1
  3452. Congratulations on getting literally everything wrong. Yes, there's already a limit. If there's an ongoing investigation, the police bodycams can be kept private, regardless of legal FOIA requests. Lawsuit against the police? For what? What's your basis? What's your claim here? The police managed to keep the arrest video out of the public's eye for 2.5 years. She didn't commit suicide over the release of the arrest video, because she was already dead for 1.5 years before it was made public. Oh, but you keep on watching Inside Edition to get your legal expertise. Another proud graduate of YouTube University, I see.
    1
  3453. Yeah, I'm sure they know not to trust a single thing said by Inside Edition.
    1
  3454. Shame on you for not knowing the story before judging others.
    1
  3455. Huh? The "first video" on Inside Edition was only about a month ago. So, how did that "harass" her?
    1
  3456. It's a misdemeanor crime, not an infraction.
    1
  3457. It is extremely unlikely that this would have resulted in her getting put on any list. Even with her lengthy criminal history, time served in prison, and arrest record a mile long, it's pretty doubtful that she'd be convicted and put on a list. More likely, this would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction. As for losing her job, well, I didn't think a stripper could lose her job, because I thought they were all just contractors (I'm not an expert), and, I'd hardly believe that the club would fire her for a sex offense anyway. As for meaning no harm, well, the witnesses' stories do not match hers, and said it was intentional, and, one of the witnesses even caught it on video and showed it to the police. Apparently, this was very loud, and in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  3458. That's probably very good advice. In this instance, however, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" caught the incident on video, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't show a quiet little discreet act outside the view of others (as portrayed by the convicted felon trying to avoid her millionth arrest), it showed the exact opposite (go read the police report). And, what with her mile long record and open warrants, a video of the incident itself, yeah, she was getting arrested.
    1
  3459. Inside Edition says it, you believe it, right?
    1
  3460. How much shame do you think she really experienced? A couple of hundred hits on a couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of? Why didn't any of her other million arrests result in this "shame"? Why didn't her felony prison term in Florida?
    1
  3461. You made a comment on a topic you know nothing whatsoever about, and, when called on it, you try to shift the topic to the other person. Very typical of people who know absolutely nothing.
    1
  3462. Well, you can start by understanding the law. They don't give warnings for aggravated misdemeanors. And, then you can look at the arrest report, her prison record, her million other arrests, etc. And, you can look at the fact that this arrest was in 2021, but she didn't commit suicide until a year later. And, you can see that the arrest video wasn't released until late in 2023. And, go from there.
    1
  3463. With multiple complaints and video of the incident itself, you think the officers don't have to arrest her?
    1
  3464. You simply cannot stop pretending to know things you don't. There's no helping you.
    1
  3465. Her own family said that this arrest had nothing to do with it, and her extensive drug and alcohol problems, and her massive criminal record, were the causes. But, you know better. Why? Because Inside Edition told you so.
    1
  3466. Nice job demonstrating that you still haven't read the arrest report.
    1
  3467. Links aren't allowed, dewdrop. And, you already proved that you're not interested in understanding it.
    1
  3468. You're way too far gone, dewdrop.
    1
  3469. One of the "audience" DID record it. The police describe the video in the arrest report.
    1
  3470. Oh, you make a lot of sense. Your Nobel Prize is in the mail.
    1
  3471. Of gave warning would apply to infraction, not of misdemeanor no warning of would.
    1
  3472. Who do you think embarrassed her?
    1
  3473. Not very likely. Even with her extensive criminal history, this is probably negotiated down to a minor infraction (had she shown up for court anyway).
    1
  3474. Flagged as spam.
    1
  3475. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3476. Oh, and this was far from being her lowest moment. With her felony prison term for stealing cars, and her mile long arrest record for other stuff, this particular arrest was just a drop in the bucket.
    1
  3477. So? Again, why can't you answer the question? What should the police do instead, in your mind?
    1
  3478. Dewdrop, the police had to release the video, else it would be a violation of the Freedom of Information Act. But, FYI: this arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Nobody saw this video while she was alive. But, you keep on pretending to know things you don't.
    1
  3479. I agree. The police certainly did not handle this in a dreadful manner.
    1
  3480. So, first you say the police surely didn't handle it badly. I agreed with you. Now, you've changed your mind to say that they handled it badly? Yet, you won't name anything that they actually did wrong? Oh, bravo!! I see a Pulitzer Prize in your future for sure.
    1
  3481. Well, how can anybody tell what's sarcastic or not? And, again, why can't you actually outline what you think they did wrong? Sorry, but you've made 3 postings now, and if you can't illustrate it after 3 postings, you have NOTHING.
    1
  3482. Sorry, but nobody can see whatever posting you made about specifying what you think they did wrong. Welcome to YouTube comments, where roughly 50% get shadow banned. Open this in an incognito window, or view it from a browser that isn't logged in. You won't be able to see your own posting without being signed in. The only person who can see it is yourself, while logged in. Personally, I make a posting, and always have another window ready to check to see if my posting is visible to the rest of the world.
    1
  3483. Nobody can see any such posting from you, besides yourself. Welcome to YouTube. Go look at this thread with an incognito window (not logged in). You won't see your own posting either.
    1
  3484. As I said, you're the only one who can see such a posting. As I said, look at this thread with an incognito window to verify.
    1
  3485. It is pretty clear that you're simply not capable of understanding that YouTube shadow bans many messages. You're the only one who can see that post from an hour ago. You'd know this if you followed my instructions to view the thread in a window not logged into YouTube. But, you refuse.
    1
  3486. I will now reply to what you cut-n-pasted into the more recent posting.
    1
  3487. "They didn't take her somewhere quiet and discuss it discreetly." Yes, they did. Watch the whole video. They took her away from the restaurant, outside of the view or earshot of others.
    1
  3488. "They allowed the scene to be filmed" Yes, of course, as most cities require nowadays.
    1
  3489. "and her identity to be shown" As required by the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3490. "handcuffed" Yes, dewdrop. All arrests include cuffing.
    1
  3491. "through a packed bar" That was the path back to the police cars. There wasn't much choice.
    1
  3492. "explain how what the police did was in any way fair and deserved" Well, in addition to my other replies to clarify your lack of understanding line by line, there were multiple calls about the woman's beach incident. The witnesses said she did it intentionally, and one of them recorded it, and showed the video to the police. She had said that this was a discreet act with nobody around (as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and she didn't want to potentially end up back in prison again). But, the video told a different story, having been a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. So, make no mistake here, she was getting arrested no matter what. And, if not for the beach incident, she'd have been arrested for any of her number of open warrants for failing to appear in court in her other many prior arrests. You know as much about police procedure as you do about how YouTube comments work (zero).
    1
  3493. Was it your goal to get literally every sentence wrong? Or, was that by accident? I already explained all of those things, dewdrop.
    1
  3494. Yeah, and I've known such people also. "It was a technicality, I really had to go and there was no bathroom around, so, I went behind a dumpster where I didn't think anybody could see, and now I'm on that registry." Yeah. Sure. Right. You have to do a lot more than that to end up on those lists.
    1
  3495. No, dewdrop, those things don't put you on those lists. That's what people on those lists want you to believe, so they can pretend they didn't do the things that they actually did.
    1
  3496. Let's be honest here... you and I both know that nobody is going up to someone in the middle of cranking to have a conversation. Stop pretending.
    1
  3497. This is a joke, right?
    1
  3498. The police blocked the release for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. Eventually, the Freedom of Information Act mandated its release.
    1
  3499. Ape doesn't know what he's talking about. Let's stick with the experts like the police and medical examiners, rather than silly conspiracies online that can't even get the dates to match up, let alone have any actual knowledge of the incident. Drop the "supposedly" nonsense. One of the witnesses on the beach recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. There's no mystery about what happened here.
    1
  3500. Yeah, but, with her mile long arrest record, and open warrants, she probably hoped she could talk her way out of it before they looked her up.
    1
  3501. Because any competent lawyer will know not to trust Inside Edition (trash news), and to find out the real story, and would know that there's absolutely no valid suit.
    1
  3502. And, you think nobody was near, why? Because a convicted felon with a mile long arrest record said so while she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest? How about the video captured by one of the witnesses that they showed to the police that says otherwise?
    1
  3503. It's doubtful too many people even knew about this arrest until after she was dead. And, if nobody bullied her the other million times she was arrested, and nobody bullied her over the term she spent in prison, I kinda doubt anybody bullied her over this little thing.
    1
  3504. Do you just make stuff up as you go? She never even went to court for this, let alone was on any kind of list. And, had she shown up for her court date, even with her mile long arrest record and the term she served in prison on a prior felony, there's nearly zero chance that she'd end up on any list. This is easily negotiated down to a minor infraction.
    1
  3505. So, anybody who corrects the parade of nonsense you spew is the problem. You're not the problem for spewing the nonsense in the first place. Someone who corrects the nonsense is the real issue. Sure.
    1
  3506. So, you're just extremely proud to make things up in your own head, and if you're wrong, you're even MORE proud about it.
    1
  3507. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. Nobody even saw the arrest video until after she was dead for 1.5 years. And, given the fact that she was a stripper at the local club, and the neighbors suspected that she also gave "one-on-ones" as well, yeah, I seriously doubt that their judgement of her would be any different over this, if they even knew about it, which they probably didn't. None of this went viral until 2.5 years later.
    1
  3508. Videographer = bodycam. And, it wasn't released until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  3509. One obscure website I've never heard of made a blog post about this arrest while she was alive. For the most part, nobody really covers convicted felons who served time in prison and have a mile long arrest record. And, nobody is all that shocked when a stripper exposes herself in public. But, this arrest video could be manipulated into a viral video, portraying the stripper as a wholesome victim who killed herself out of shame. So, that's how they played it.
    1
  3510. Really? And, you think there's a right to privacy in a public place? And, what exactly was "mismanaged" here? You say it could be done differently, yet, you don't name a single example.
    1
  3511. Well, the police managed to block the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, what do you propose to do about the Freedom of Information Act? Don't scream at the wind. What's your solution?
    1
  3512. Well, no major media covered this story until long after she was dead. So, it's pretty doubtful that she was humiliated. And, if she didn't commit suicide over any of her prior million arrests, or her term in prison, I'd fail to see why this particular arrest would be all that tragic to her.
    1
  3513. The witness who took video of the event said that the woman had wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, and then it appeared that she intentionally chose a spot right in front of a family with children. Thanks, but, I'll go with the words of one of the random people who called the police and got the event on video, before I'll go with the words of a woman with a mile long arrest and prison record who is attempting to avoid getting arrested for the umpteenth time.
    1
  3514. Nothing was "blasted" until long after she was dead. And, maybe you should read a few articles about this... they'll tell you she walked out on her family and friends a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Her husband and son didn't even show up at her funeral. And, according to the medical examiner's report, her body was well into the maggot phase of decomposition, and was down to 84 pounds. Apparently, absolutely nobody was even looking for her, and it wasn't until the landlord went into the apartment looking for overdue rent that her body was found. That shows how many loved ones she had.
    1
  3515. With this woman's mile long arrest record and felony term in prison, you don't think she was a real criminal?
    1
  3516. Well, she was a convicted felon who had been arrested a million times, so, yeah, you'd think she'd know not to say anything. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered because one of the witnesses recorded it and gave the video to the police. But, my guess is that she was unaware of that, and was trying to cry/talk her way out of it before the police would look up her open warrants. If she stayed silent, then there'd be no doubt that they'd have looked her up. But, probably, by trying to talk her way out of it, she thought there'd be a chance that they wouldn't bother to look her up.
    1
  3517. "Didn't mean it"? The video of the incident doesn't agree with you, nor the witnesses, nor the police. Why do you think otherwise? Because she whined and cried while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  3518. What a super-sleuth! (Sigh) First of all, she never showed up at court (which seemed to be how she had been handling all of her various arrests, given the number of open warrants for failures to appear). Secondly, oh, a ticket for a crime now? I thought you got a ticket for an infraction, but got arrested for a crime. Do explain the legal system to me, please? You're clearly the expert here. Third, nobody saw the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3519. But, she was never punished for this arrest. She didn't show up at her court hearings. And, with her long history of moving around, changing her name to avoid arrest, etc., it was hard to follow up. The cops had a difficult time even serving her for all of the legal judgments she had against her for theft and stuff. And, with her prior criminal record, prison time, stealing cars, public intoxication, and serious drug and alcohol abuse, yes, this little arrest probably meant nothing in the bigger scheme of things.
    1
  3520. Well, you hit the nail on the head in the 2nd half of what you wrote. Multiple people called, and yes, one of them took video and gave it to the police. And, I also think she was in a bit of a fix about whether to say anything or not. If she remained silent, there'd be a 100% chance that they'd look her up and find her prior million arrests and open warrants, etc. But, by trying to cry her way out of it, maybe she figured they might let her go before looking her up.
    1
  3521. Huh? There were no headlines while she was alive. She died more than 2 years ago. This story didn't go viral until the arrest video was released a few months ago.
    1
  3522. That makes no sense whatsoever. First of all, why would you believe the words from the woman who was trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time? Secondly, multiple people called the police for this incident. Why? Because it was in public view. Third, you seem to know that one of the "audience" made a recording of the incident and showed it to the police. The police report says that the video showed a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. So, if it was so private, how'd someone get it on video? Personally, I trust innocent bystanders and the police more than I trust the words from a convicted felon with a legal/arrest record a mile long. Why do you feel the opposite?
    1
  3523. Yeah, but, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered much. One of the "audience" recorded the incident with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. She was getting arrested either way, whether she said a single word, or not.
    1
  3524. Dewdrop, the video was never on YouTube until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3525. But, the news outlets never even covered the story while she was alive. How could they be responsible for her death?
    1
  3526. Well, your first sentence is correct enough. But, no big media outfits covered any of this until after she was dead for 1.5 years. She suffered virtually no humiliation.
    1
  3527. Better start looking into the mirror before you accuse everyone else of doing stuff wrong. The arrest was in July of 2021. Her suicide was in March of 2022. The arrest video was not made public until November of 2023. And, it was most likely a result of a legal FOIA request. Do you want to modify your list a little bit about who mishandled this?
    1
  3528. Mile long legal history, did a felony prison term for stealing cars, multiple judgements against her for various thefts, arrests for drugs and alcohol galore, numerous failures to appear in court, and open warrants for arrest. Yes, so nice.
    1
  3529. No. What you're seeing here is a media trick to get two rounds of viral hits out of one story (and not even an accurate one). She died two years ago. But, in order to get two viral rounds, when the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023, they first published it without mentioning that she was already dead. Then, a few weeks later, they published the "update" that she had killed herself. In reality, her suicide was unrelated to this arrest video. That's why the story is, "Was she shamed to death? That's the question." But, they never actually answer.
    1
  3530. But, hey, I'm all ears. How could it have been done better?
    1
  3531. Nope. One of the "audience" recorded the incident and showed it to the police. And, even if hypothetically that wasn't enough, they'd have arrested her anyway for all of her open warrants.
    1
  3532. The officers PREVENTED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it. And, when they finally released it, it was due to a FOIA request (no choice).
    1
  3533. Dewdrop, if you put on a show in public in front of children, you're getting arrested in EVERY state.
    1
  3534. Another proud graduate of YouTube University School of Law. Dewdrop, stop pretending you understand things you don't.
    1
  3535. It's called the Freedom of Information Act. But, you're wrong either way. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Nobody saw it while she was alive, so, it had nothing to do with her death.
    1
  3536. Really? A citation for a crime now? I always thought that you got a citation for an infraction, and got arrested for a crime. But, you're clearly the legal expert here, so, please enlighten me about how the law works?
    1
  3537. Multiple people called, not just one family. That's what happens when people witness a crime, they're supposed to call the police.
    1
  3538. A) They managed to keep the video from being made public for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after her death. B) When they did make it public, it was most likely the result of a legal FOIA request, which they cannot deny once the case is closed long enough. So, what do you want to sue them for?
    1
  3539. And, you're PROUD to behave this way?
    1
  3540. The witnesses disagreed with you, as did the video one of the "audience" took.
    1
  3541. Naw, I'm sure they know that this Inside Edition story is completely misleading.
    1
  3542. She's been dead for almost two years. No, the release of this video a few weeks ago had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  3543. With her prior arrest record, I wouldn't be surprised if they had those specially made just for her.
    1
  3544. Naw. This is just sensationalist journalism. This arrest video had nothing to do with her suicide.
    1
  3545. Blame the victim, not the criminal, huh?
    1
  3546. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  3547. But, she wasn't shown on YouTube until 1.5 years after she was dead. And, sorry, but the person who recorded her on that beach never released the video (as far as I'm aware). They showed it to the police, but, I don't think anybody else ever saw it.
    1
  3548. You have your timeline wrong, and Inside Edition sure isn't going to tell it to you (destroys their false narrative). July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. She suffered zero embarrassment from the arrest video, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3549. But, she wasn't put on blast until long after she was dead.
    1
  3550. A) Why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so to the police, as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and possibly being sent back to prison again? B) Why do you believe she was shamed over this? Because Inside Edition told you so?
    1
  3551. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. And, you clearly do not know the difference between a crime and infraction.
    1
  3552. Freedom of Information Act. But, FYI, the arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later, long after she was dead.
    1
  3553. But, none of the "global humiliation" happened until long after she was already dead.
    1
  3554. The police didn't release the video for 2.5 years after the arrest. It wasn't released until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3555. Huh? The Freedom of Information Act REQUIRES that they release the video if the investigation is closed for a certain period of time. 2.5 years had gone by, and she was already dead for 1.5 years. What choice did the police have at that point?
    1
  3556. And, you believe she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so, as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? I have this bridge for sale also. Interested?
    1
  3557. And, you believe a single word of that, why? Because she said so, while trying to avoid her millionth arrest? Dewdrop, multiple people called about this incident. One even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this version she's telling about a quiet act when nobody was around. It was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Yet, I agree, it was fairly minor in the bigger scheme of things, which makes it all the more curious about why she refused to show up in court. Even with the woman's felony history, time served in prison, and mile long arrest record, and open warrants, it probably would have either been thrown out, or negotiated down to a minor infraction. Why do you believe her anyway? I mean, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" encounters in her apartment for cash with numerous men. She had serious drug and alcohol problems. Is it THAT difficult to swallow the idea that maybe she did what they accused her of? Personally, I'll go with innocent bystanders and the police before I'll trust a convicted felon who can't stop getting arrested for various crimes. Not you, though.
    1
  3558. Tons of arrests for the past decade. Stealing cars. Drug and alcohol charges. Repeated failures to appear. Other thefts. Civil judgments. Criminal convictions. Felony term served in a Florida prison. And, you think it was "game over" because of this little charge that would have been easily negotiated down to a minor infraction (had she bothered to show up in court)?
    1
  3559. Who? And, how do you know this?
    1
  3560. Really? You don't think this charge would have easily been negotiated down to a minor infraction? Get real.
    1
  3561. Yeah, but she was stuck between a rock and a hard place. I imagine she was probably thinking that if she stayed silent, they'd look up her criminal history and find open warrants... but if she talked, there'd be a 50/50 chance that she could cry her way out of it before they looked her up.
    1
  3562. Well, then let me explain. Multiple people called about this incident. One of the "audience" took video and gave it to the police. The video doesn't match her story about a quiet little act while nobody was around. To the contrary, it appeared to be an intentional act, and it was loud, and in front of children. Furthermore, she was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She had extensive arrests for various crimes before and after. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Other thefts. Failing to appear. You name it. See, with that history, it's really tough to get a straight job. So, her landlord and neighbors said that she was a stripper at the local club, and did "private" cash encounters in her apartment. Now, if you want to believe the sob story about a harmless thing with nobody around, that's up to you. But, frankly, I'll stick with what innocent bystanders say, and the police say, before I'd believe a single word out of her.
    1
  3563. Multiple people called over this incident. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Why would you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests before and after. You find her more credible than the innocent bystanders who recorded the incident, and the police themselves?
    1
  3564. Oh, you're a real legal eagle alright. If you wanted to cram the most incorrect information into the smallest amount of words, well, I think you win the prize.
    1
  3565. Sure, if you trust the words from a woman with a mile long history of arrests, prison term for stealing cars, drug and alcohol problems, many failures to appear in court, and multiple judgements against her for various thefts.
    1
  3566. No, the purpose is to generate ad revenue. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive, so, I fail to see how she could be humiliated by something nobody saw.
    1
  3567. Just checking here... you do know that the arrest video never went public until she was already dead for 1.5 years... right?
    1
  3568. Thanks, but, that's called vigilante justice, and it's straight out of the dark ages. We have graduated on to this concept called a "society," in which we employ these people called "police" to deal with crime.
    1
  3569. Blame the victim, not the criminal?
    1
  3570. I don't think he's correct. The police report only mentions one video taken by the "audience," not multiple videos.
    1
  3571.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  Shocker. Media got something wrong? Say it ain't so!! I've never seen that before. Have you read the police report?
    1
  3572.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  Did you read the police report?
    1
  3573.  @LunaLapin-ho5tk  No, it's online. You must not have tried very hard.
    1
  3574. Sure. But, in this case, it wouldn't have mattered. One of the "audience" got it on video, and showed the video to the police. She was getting arrested whether she said anything or not.
    1
  3575. And, you believe she was harassed, why? Because you watched Inside Edition? Sorry, but, trash news isn't reliable. And, you should look into the real facts of the case.
    1
  3576. FYI: this arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Nobody saw this video while she was alive.
    1
  3577. Well, according to her landlord, her "livelihood" was as a "dancer" (yeah, that kind) at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private extras" for parades of paying men in her apartment. Her livelihood wouldn't be threatened because of this. Her other "livelihood" included an endless arrest record and felony term in 2018 in a Florida prison... stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, various other thefts, judgements both civil and criminal, etc.
    1
  3578. Well, her story about thinking nobody was around doesn't make any sense in the first place, so, it's a moot point.
    1
  3579. Huh? The arrest video wasn't released until 2.5 years later. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw the video.
    1
  3580. Dewdrop, this incident didn't cause her suicide. Just because Inside Edition asks, "did this shame her into suicide?" doesn't mean the answer is "yes." She didn't commit suicide until around a year after this arrest. And, this arrest was no different than the other million arrests under her belt, the felony prison term she served, the multiple judgements against her for theft, the drug and alcohol charges, etc.
    1
  3581. 1 B) Multiple people called the police. One of the audience recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. Yes, there was plenty of proof. And, needless to say, it doesn't match the version she's putting forth about being a discreet act with nobody around... as she's trying to say to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  3582. 2) Freedom of Information Act. But, at least they didn't release it until long after she was dead. Nobody saw the video while she was alive.
    1
  3583. 1 A) I think you have confused a crime with an infraction. You can get a warning for an infraction, or a citation, or asked to leave, whatever. But, for a crime, you get arrested.
    1
  3584. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video made public from legal FOIA request.
    1
  3585. Stop pretending you understand things you don't.
    1
  3586. You've read many articles? How about reading the police report itself? They not only describe the video taken of the incident, but, they name the exact witnesses that called.
    1
  3587. At 20 seconds into this very video, the police state that there were multiple calls, you know. As I said, you can verify this in the police report also, but, it seems that you haven't even watched this video.
    1
  3588. The "Smoking Gun" blog post didn't have the arrest video. As I said, that wasn't released until long after she was dead.
    1
  3589. It won't let me reply about your last message, it's getting blocked. So, just about the speeding comment, dewdrop, speeding is an INFRACTION, not a crime.
    1
  3590. Same goes for the other topic (it's blocking my replies). Depending on where, yes, infraction, not a crime.
    1
  3591. The incident in this video was a crime. Yet, you boldly not only don't know the difference between a crime and an infraction, but, you doubled down, demonstrating it twice.
    1
  3592. Beyond that, it's pretty clear that you're not the brightest bulb in the pack. How about paying attention to try to close that gap a bit?
    1
  3593. Yet another person saying it was handled wrong, but refuses to say how to handle it right. Bravo.
    1
  3594. Multiple people called the police for this incident, stating that she was doing it intentionally. One of the audience captured it on video, and gave a copy to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this version of "nobody was around." Quite to the contrary, she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, had a million other arrests, and according to her landlord, was a stripper at the local club. Yet, you'll trust her word rather than the words of innocent bystanders and the police? Yeah, you're a true genius.
    1
  3595. You don't know what you're talking about.
    1
  3596. Good gods. She abandoned her family including a 6 month old boy over a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. She spent a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. Stealing cars. Other thefts. Drug and alcohol charges. Numerous failures to appear. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she did cash "extras" in her apartment. Need I continue?
    1
  3597. Huh? How would you prevent it from being made public? The police blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. But, eventually, the Freedom of Information Act requires its release. How do you overturn that?
    1
  3598. Notice? Warning? For this misdemeanor? Sorry, but you don't get a warning for this crime. And, what about all of her open warrants? You think the cops had a choice here?
    1
  3599. Leaked? Who "leaked" it?
    1
  3600. OK, I agree with you. But, just making sure you know... social media didn't even get involved until 2.5 years later, right? She was long dead before any social media posted anything.
    1
  3601. Tell me that if it was a man at a playground, you'd just leave and go to another playground, or that you'd go up and talk to the man while he's doing his thing....?
    1
  3602. No, she's a victim of HERSELF.
    1
  3603. Huh? What "media" even covered this while she was alive? A couple of obscure blog posts that nobody's ever heard of?
    1
  3604. And, sorry, but, if she didn't like getting arrested, she should have stopped committing so many crimes. (You do know she was a convicted felon who spent time in a Florida prison, and had a million other arrests, right? You do know that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, right?)
    1
  3605. Dewdrop, I never said I was happy about the result. I said she's not a victim of the media (which was YOUR claim). Nearly zero media covered this story while she was alive.
    1
  3606. Good grief. You'd lose a checkers match against a squirrel. What don't you understand here? ACCOUNTABILITY!! The media had nothing whatsoever to do with her death, because 99.999% of the media never even happened while she was alive. She is responsible for her own actions.
    1
  3607. Nobody embarrassed her with the arrest video, because nobody saw it until long after she was dead.
    1
  3608. The person responsible is herself. Stop blaming the victim.
    1
  3609. Well, the gun was undoubtedly not legal, given that she was a convicted felon (not allowed to have it). But, getting guns is not difficult.
    1
  3610. Gee, what gave that away, was it the fact that she was arrested?
    1
  3611. I think she ruined her own life about 15 years ago when she left her family (husband, 6 month old son, and another son) and friends in order to live a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  3612. Freedom of Information Act. But, at least it wasn't made public until long after she was dead.
    1
  3613. Police wear bodycams nowadays. That's how life is. And, the FOIA makes it mandatory to release it. But, the saving grace is that it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she committed suicide. So, she never suffered any humiliation while alive.
    1
  3614. There's no such concept as getting arrested without getting cuffed.
    1
  3615. She admitted to doing it while being questioned. Watch the full arrest video for more. But, yes, multiple people called about this incident, and one of the "audience" recorded it and showed the video to the police. It didn't match this version she's telling while trying to avoid her millionth arrest. It wasn't a quiet act when nobody was around. It was a loud public display in view of multiple people including children. And, I mean, c'mon here, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and neighbors said she also did "private" sessions for cash with numerous men in her apartment. Is this really that difficult to believe she did this act on the beach? Before you accuse others of disgraceful behavior, how about learning something about the topic first?
    1
  3616. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting arrested gets arrested again" doesn't make headlines. "Innocent soccer mom gets busted by evil police and commits suicide" gets headlines. If you can't report the news, you manufacture it.
    1
  3617. Who humiliated her on the internet?
    1
  3618. Huh? On what basis?
    1
  3619. Virtually no media even covered it while she was alive. And, she was never convicted because she never showed up in court.
    1
  3620. Really? You think that's how their jobs work? Officers decide this, not the courts?
    1
  3621. I'm afraid you have your facts completely reversed. Her arrest record began long before this incident. Public drunkenness arrests. Did some prison time for stealing cars. Lots of alcohol and drug issues. A string of judgments against her for theft. Attempting to change her name a few times to avoid arrest and being served. Numerous failures to appear in court (for various prior stuff, then this incident also). And, sorry, but it's not up to you to determine what's "major" or not. If she commits a crime, she gets arrested. That's how this works. And, you're also wrong about the timeline of this incident. July 2021 = this arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 2023 = the arrest video was made public. She didn't kill herself over shame from this arrest video, because nobody ever saw it until 1.5 years after she was already dead. As for the incident, why exactly do you believe her version of it? Because she said so? The police report tells a very different version than she's telling, as she's attempting to get out of being arrested, yet again.
    1
  3622. Flagged as misinformation.
    1
  3623. Yeah, that's how it goes, until long after the case is closed. While there's an open investigation, the video remains private. In this case, the video remained private for 2.5 years. It wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3624. The arrest video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died. Furthermore, it was a legal FOIA request.
    1
  3625. And, you think you can convince a jury to ignore the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  3626. Multiple people called about this incident. One captured it on video, and showed it to the police. The video didn't match the version she's telling about a discreet act with nobody around. Quite the contrary. And, to answer your question, it's called the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3627. Were you looking into the mirror when you wrote this?
    1
  3628. So, you want to repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  3629. Bro, it's her own fault, not the media's.
    1
  3630. But, she didn't make headlines until 2.5 years later, when the arrest video was released to the public. She was long dead before she was ever a headline.
    1
  3631. Freedom of Information Act. And, what family? The one she abandoned a decade ago?
    1
  3632. I'm trying to reply, but, it keeps blocking me.
    1
  3633. Do you just blindly swallow any gibberish Inside Edition says? Almost nobody publicized anything about this incident until long after she died.
    1
  3634. Indecent exposure is a crime.
    1
  3635. Really? A warning for a crime? I thought you could only get a warning for infractions, but not for crimes. But, you're the legal expert here. Do explain?
    1
  3636. OK, but, let me ask, if it was a man at a playground, would you say the same?
    1
  3637. So, personal accountability is not part of your vocabulary? Blame the victim?
    1
  3638. You have no idea what you're talking about. They didn't do anything wrong.
    1
  3639. First of all, the police didn't release the arrest video until November 24, 2023. She died about 2 years ago.
    1
  3640. Secondly, it's called the Freedom of Information Act. Good luck with that suit.
    1
  3641. Hilarious!! You don't even know what it's called. You just got done saying "FOI," instead of "FOIA." Yet, you're honestly going to pretend you understand it better than the cops and the news outlets? "That surgeon is doing that procedure all wrong. But, remind me, what's a scalpel again?"
    1
  3642. There were multiple callers, not one. And, what would you be saying if it was a man cranking at the playground?
    1
  3643. Well, that's one way to demonstrate that you didn't read the arrest report. How about the video of the incident, and the multiple callers and their testimonies? Those don't count?
    1
  3644. When did they start giving tickets for crimes? And, no social media even covered this event until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3645. Huh? A couple of obscure blogs that nobody has ever heard of? Why? Do you ever hold people accountable for their own actions? Or, just shift the blame?
    1
  3646. Um, ok, but how is that relevant here? She was a stripper who did those kinds of shows every day. And, frankly, I think her felony prison term for stealing cars is a lot darker than this particular arrest that resulted in nothing. Or, for that matter, pick anything else out of her mile long list of arrests and judgements against her, failures to appear in court, open warrants for her arrest, drug and alcohol issues, etc. At least nobody saw this particular arrest of her until long after she was dead.
    1
  3647. You can kind of tweak it. On the YouTube homepage, at the top, it shows you the categories that it uses when deciding what to feature for you. You can X out the stuff you don't want. It works sometimes.
    1
  3648. Well, that's certainly one way to demonstrate that you didn't read the arrest report. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. Also, you don't know the definition of the word "hearsay."
    1
  3649. Direct statements from actual witnesses isn't hearsay.
    1
  3650. Don't admit to anything... but, she probably was hoping to cry her way out of her millionth arrest before they looked her up and found all of the open warrants.
    1
  3651. Bingo.
    1
  3652. What? Why?
    1
  3653. Yeah. When you see a guy at a playground doing the same thing, don't call the police. It might ruin his day.
    1
  3654. In the USA, they use cuffs on every single arrest. It's required.
    1
  3655. Do you really not understand bodycams? Also, the arrest video wasn't released until after she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3656. No. You should be ashamed for trusting anything you see on Inside Edition.
    1
  3657. Really? And, it was because of this arrest? So, about a year later after this arrest, she killed herself because of this arrest? What about the other million arrests? She didn't kill herself when she served time in prison a few years earlier. What was the reason that THIS arrest did the trick, and none of the other arrests? And, why'd she wait a year after this arrest to do it?
    1
  3658. Um, ok, sue who? And, on what basis?
    1
  3659. You remember this woman's arrest from 2.5 years ago? Huh? How? The arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023.
    1
  3660. Well, then I imagine you'd be relieved to know that the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3661. Of you just moved? Of you would of done that of if it was of a man at a playground of of? Haved you not of understand of the laws correctly of?
    1
  3662. Of should of never what of happened?
    1
  3663. Well, not only did she admit it, but, one of the audience recorded it and gave the video to the police.
    1
  3664. The people who called the police weren't walking in the first place. The woman plopped down in front of people (including children), and put on a show.
    1
  3665. Yeah, when that guy at the playgrounds cranks it in front of the kids, just butt out.
    1
  3666. It's exactly the same. She plopped down in front of a bunch of people including children and put on a show.
    1
  3667. Yes, that's exactly what happened. Did you not read the arrest report?
    1
  3668. You have the "unbelievable" part quite correct.
    1
  3669. The arrest video wasn't made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after her death. YouTube did nothing to cause her suicide.
    1
  3670. Blame anybody except the criminal herself, eh?
    1
  3671. Wow. With her mile long prior record, you want more of her? Arrest record for multiple crimes. Did some prison time for stealing cars. Had judgements against her for various thefts. Numerous failures to appear in court. Lots of issues with drugs and alcohol. Etc. And, yeah, people were able to take video of her act on the beach because she did it in view of the public (contrary to the words spoken by a woman trying to avoid getting arrested yet again). Yes, one of the "audience" was able to capture the crime on camera, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public display in front of multiple people including children. Sorry, we don't lock people up for taking videos of crimes happening. We lock people up for committing the crimes in the first place. You've got your priorities backward. Oh, and by the way, her suicide had nothing to do with this incident anyway. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    1
  3672. As far as I am aware, the video of the incident was never made public. The contents of the video were described in the police report. The only video that was made public was this arrest video, which wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3673. And, if you'll take unsolicited advise from an old man you've never met... sorry... you can't save them. I know from personal experience about feeling like you can rescue them. But, you can't.
    1
  3674. Camera crew? Like, you don't know police wear cameras on their vests?
    1
  3675. Multiple people called the police, not just one family. One witness even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public act in front of multiple people, including children. The witness also said that the woman seemed to intentionally plop down in front of people after wandering up and down the beach for a while. I'm sorry if this differs from the version spoken by a woman who was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, but, hey, "I didn't do it" is a pretty common claim.
    1
  3676. And, you know this from a 1 minute Inside Edition (where facts don't matter) video? Good grief. You couldn't be more incorrect if you had tried.
    1
  3677. Well, the witnesses beg to differ with you. One of them caught it on video, and showed the video to the police. Sorry, but the video didn't match her version of a quiet little discreet act with nobody around. Making a long story short, just making sure you're aware... this woman was a convicted felon who served prison time for stealing cars, and had a mile long arrest record for other thefts, drugs and alcohol, failures to appear in court, etc. Her straight career was destroyed long before, so, according to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. I mean, I could type a heck of a lot more to paint the picture more accurately than the false image of an innocent soccer mom caught on the beach (like Inside Edition portrays). But, anyway, according to the witnesses, yes, it did seem like she did it intentionally.
    1
  3678. Yeah, whenever you see a man cranking it at the playground in front of children, leave him alone.
    1
  3679. But, dewdrop, the video wasn't released until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3680. No, she never showed up in court. And, as for your suit, what's the basis?
    1
  3681. So, you're encouraging attorneys to issue frivolous suits on no basis? Isn't that grounds for heavy fines and possible loss of license?
    1
  3682. What would you have done differently? And, make no mistake about it, there wasn't a way to avoid getting arrested. With the video taken by the "audience," plus the pile of open warrants from other arrests and no-shows in court, yeah, there was no way to avoid the arrest.
    1
  3683. Huh? According to her landlord, she was a stripper who put on "shows" like this every day. Sure, most of those were probably at a club, or at "private" showings for one-on-one customers, not necessarily at a public beach. But, I seriously doubt this incident did anything to change anybody's opinion of her. She was already a convicted felon who served a prison term, and had a mile long list of judgements and arrests and open warrants and everything. What's one more?
    1
  3684. The landlord was a woman, not a man. And, thanks for proving my original point (which seems to have flown right over your head).
    1
  3685. Don't worry, I'm sure the feeling is mutual.
    1
  3686. Why? What's the basis for your suit? And, who's it against?
    1
  3687. Huh? For what?
    1
  3688. What was so special about this particular arrest (as compared to her other million arrests) that made her kill herself about a year later? Why would you think that this arrest led to anything?
    1
  3689. But, none of this went viral until the arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She died two years ago. There was nearly zero coverage of this while she was alive. A couple of obscure websites that I've never heard of made a posting that she had been arrested, but, it's doubtful very many people read it, or cared. And, they blur for open investigations, but don't have to blur for closed ones.
    1
  3690. Secondly, why do you believe she was alone? Because she said so, as she was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest?
    1
  3691. Third, yeah, I think I'll stick with the words from the innocent bystanders (one of whom recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police), and the words of the cops, before I'll believe a single word out of a convicted felon with an arrest record a mile long.
    1
  3692. It won't let me post the first thing, so figure it out yourself.
    1
  3693. Fourth, this was a misdemeanor. No "fine" for that.
    1
  3694. Multiple people called the police. And, you have your facts backward. According to witnesses, she wandered up and down the beach, looking for a spot, and chose one in view of others. Nobody followed her. One of the "audience" took video of the act, and showed that video to the police. Sorry, but, it doesn't match this version she's telling about a discreet thing outside the view of others, a version she's trying to portray while attempting to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  3695. WOW!! Were you attempting to get every single thing wrong? Or, was that accidental?
    1
  3696. All arrests include cuffing, period.
    1
  3697. The way back to the police cars was through the restaurant.
    1
  3698. You have confused an infraction with a crime. They don't give tickets for indecent exposure. For that, they arrest. For an infraction, speeding, double parking, fishing without a license, whatever, sure, a ticket. But, for a misdemeanor crime like this, um, no.
    1
  3699. Plus, even in your world of giving a ticket for a crime, do you really think they'd do that here? She had open warrants for her arrest for numerous failures to appear in court. (And, as a side note, she didn't show up in court for this arrest either.) She was a convicted felon with time served in prison for stealing cars, and a mile long arrest and judgement record for various other stuff.
    1
  3700. I specifically loved the fact that you didn't know anything about the video, how it was taken, etc., but, you think you knew enough to declare that it caused her suicide. Hilarious!!! "I don't know what a scalpel is, or how to use it, but, that doctor over there is performing that surgery all wrong." That's exactly what you sound like.
    1
  3701. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Her suicide = March, 2022. This arrest video was released = November 24, 2023. It had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide, because nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3702. Congratulations. Not a single sentence you wrote was correct. Your prize is in the mail.
    1
  3703. Sorry for the multiple replies, but, it was blocking my one reply that had all of the content in one posting. It's still blocking some of the other details you botched, but, whatever, you get the point.
    1
  3704. But, they didn't release it until she was dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3705. 1) It's called a FOIA request. 2) If there's a silver lining to be found in this tragedy, it's that, at least the poor woman didn't have to live through any public embarrassment over the arrest video, since it wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died. I mean, you don't trust Inside Edition, do you?
    1
  3706. Wrong. Multiple witnesses called the police. They reported that she was walking up and down the beach, and then chose a spot with people in view. One of the audience even recorded it and showed the video to the police. The video didn't match her version of a quiet act when nobody was around. To the contrary, it was a loud act in view of people including children.
    1
  3707. Huh? First of all, if they get a legal FOIA request, and the case has been closed long enough, they have to release the video as-is. It's up to the media outlets for whether to blur the faces. Secondly, the cops managed to keep the video private for 2.5 years. There's no "blood on their hands," because she was dead long before anybody saw this video.
    1
  3708. And, what exactly do you think the reason was?
    1
  3709. Multiple people called about this incident. One of them caught in on video, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video differs from the version she's telling as she's attempting to avoid her millionth arrest. The witnesses said she deliberately chose a spot in front of people. The video shows a loud and public act in front of multiple people including children. I mean, you do know that she was a convicted felon who served time in prison and had a million arrests before this, right? You do know that her landlord said she was a stripper, and her neighbors said she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men, right? So, let's face reality here, this woman had no idea what shame was. And, given that the arrest video and the viral coverage didn't come out until long after she was dead, she really didn't suffer much embarrassment while she was alive. But, hey, you keep on pretending you know things you don't. You're pretty good at it. How about heading over to a brain surgery video and tell the doctor he should be ashamed of himself for the procedure he uses?
    1
  3710. Yet, the straw had a delayed fuse of 9 months?
    1
  3711. Well, the one saving grace is that she didn't have to suffer from much humiliation from the video going public while she was alive, because the arrest video wasn't released until she was already dead 1.5 years.
    1
  3712. Horrible reporting = viral. Honest reporting = 200 hits.
    1
  3713. Remember that next time you take your kids to a playground and a man comes up and does the same thing.
    1
  3714. Sorry, but, in a society, we do NOT take matters into our own hands, and we call the police when a crime happens. And, your way does no good for anybody. And, social media didn't destroy her. There was zero social media exposure, and only one obscure website that reported anything. Nobody even knew her name until the arrest video was released 1.5 years after she was already dead.
    1
  3715. Probably because it's fake news, manufactured to go viral on a completely false basis.
    1
  3716. Wait, huh? Why would you make that comment about the police? What do you think they had to do with her suicide?
    1
  3717. Just checking here... you do know that this was just a big media setup, right? When the "original video came out of her arrest" (November 24, 2023), she was already dead for 1.5 years. They just didn't elect to say so, because they were building to this second wave of videos to make people believe that the release of the arrest video caused the suicide.
    1
  3718. Well, we tend to say that adults should be accountable for their own actions. But, you're clearly implying someone else. Who is "someone" in your mind?
    1
  3719. Wow!! You know that much about her from a 1 minute video, huh?
    1
  3720. "lead to someone losing the job" Huh? She gave up her job a decade ago when she abandoned her career and family in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. It's difficult to get a job as a convicted felon who spent time in prison about 6 years ago. And, she picked up her crime spree after getting out of prison. With her mile long arrest record, stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, etc., yeah, it's tough to get a normal job. So, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Do you really think she'd lose that job?
    1
  3721. "posted everyone’s arrest videos for clout & to destroy peoples lives" Um, no. This arrest = July 1, 2021. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, no, the arrest video didn't do ANYTHING to her life, because she wasn't alive when anybody saw it.
    1
  3722. "lost her life over this" Because Inside Edition said so? You'd believe Inside Edition, why?
    1
  3723. Don't worry, she didn't. Inside Edition tries to paint that picture. But, even a casual internet search would show the opposite.
    1
  3724. Well, Sarah K. Moss was the one who made the recorded video of the incident on the beach. If you're worried about the husband, why was the wife recording it?
    1
  3725. Well, that's one way to easily tell that you didn't bother reading the arrest report. Multiple people called, not just one. One of the "audience" recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about "nobody was around" as she's attempting to worm her way out of her millionth arrest. The video depicts quite a different story, of a loud and pubic show in view of multiple people including children. I mean, you do know she was a convicted felon with a mile long record, right? You do know that her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentleman's club, right? I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of it before they looked her up and found her pile of open warrants.
    1
  3726. Blame what, exactly?
    1
  3727. Huh? You do know she had a mile long record, right?
    1
  3728. Huh? Do you even know what pieces of this story were or weren't public while she was alive? The police successfully blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. She was long dead before anybody saw it.
    1
  3729. Well, how do you prevent it? Freedom of Information Act. But, at least the arrest video was never seen until long after she was dead.
    1
  3730. Um, no. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. Arrest video first made public and posted = November 24, 2023. Period.
    1
  3731. Huh? The normal body camera, and the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  3732. Well, she had plenty of drug arrests also. What's your point? Do you not understand the difference when someone puts on a public show like she did?
    1
  3733. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  3734. Huh? She didn't suffer one bit from the release of the arrest video. She was already dead 1.5 years by the time anybody ever saw it.
    1
  3735. Huh? She did have a husband. And, she had two kids from two fathers. Years before this incident, she left that life behind in order to go "wild" and "off the rails" (her family's words), and decided to lead a life of drugs and crime instead.
    1
  3736. Well, I don't think they got a divorce. But, I'm not 100% sure.
    1
  3737. Um, ok, on what grounds? I truly don't understand what you mean.
    1
  3738. Only if you believe trash news like Inside Edition.
    1
  3739. Who did what to whom?
    1
  3740. Another proud graduate of YouTube University's School of Law, eh? Dewdrop, for an infraction, yes, you can get a warning. For a crime, you get arrested.
    1
  3741. Third, the police did everything they could to keep it as discreet as possible. They took her away from the restaurant to question her, outside the view of others. And, they kept the arrest video private for 2.5 years. It wasn't released until she had already been dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3742. And, fourth, come on, get real, what was so different about this particular arrest that would push her over the edge that her other million arrests didn't? Even her felony time served in prison didn't push her over the edge, so, why should this incident do that?
    1
  3743. Secondly, by your logic, this would mean that cops shouldn't ever arrest anybody.
    1
  3744. Not even close. Is that what YouTube is for you? Someplace you can pretend to know things you don't? Good grief.
    1
  3745. Not the brightest bulb, eh?
    1
  3746. What do you mean? What did the cops do wrong?
    1
  3747. So, they did their jobs, but, you think poorly? What? And, what's the claim you're making in your suit?
    1
  3748. The arrest video never was posted anywhere until after she was dead for more than 1.5 years. Sorry that Inside Edition is not interested in telling you that.
    1
  3749. WOW, I mean, just plain WOW. And, you determined all of that from a 1 minute Inside Edition video?
    1
  3750. Yes, multiple people called. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around.
    1
  3751. Her felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago? Her million other arrests before and after? "Well together"? Huh?
    1
  3752. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. Her neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment with a parade of men. "Well together"? If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of yet another arrest, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  3753. Her own family said that her problems were that she went completely "wild" and "off the rails" when, more than a decade ago, she walked out on her husband, a 6 month old son, and another son, in order to live a life of crime and drugs. But, Inside Edition paints this picture of the innocent soccer mom, and you'll just believe it?
    1
  3754. Well, that's an interesting take on it. But, if this incident was the straw that broke the camel's back, why'd she wait almost a year after this arrest? And, for that matter, what was it about this particular arrest that broke the camel's back? I mean, her felony prison term for stealing cars didn't break the camel's back. None of her other million arrests and judgements against her broke the camel's back. Why this one?
    1
  3755. Ridiculous "journalism." This incident was from July of 2021. She committed suicide in March of 2022. The arrest video was made public in November of 2023. Clearly, the release of this arrest video had no relevance to her suicide.
    1
  3756. Then you fell for poor journalism twice then, huh? Do you just believe everything you see, or what?
    1
  3757. Yes, they did that. They prevented the release of the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3758. What different way? Why do people like you say "they're doing it wrong" without saying what you think should be done instead?
    1
  3759. WHO "shamed" her? She put on a show at the beach in front of an audience (including children), almost certainly to produce "public beach" content for her fans. She made her living at the "dance" club (yeah, that kind), and according to her neighbors, by also doing "private extras" for bunches of paying men in her apartment. I fail to see this "shame" you speak of. Can you explain?
    1
  3760. This incident = July 1, 2021. She exited this world in February or March of 2022 (unknown date). The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3761. Family? Loved ones? She abandoned her family (including a 6 month old son, and another son) more than a decade ago to lead a life of crime and drugs. She interacted with virtually nobody besides the parade of paying men in her apartment, to the extent that absolutely nobody was looking for her for a month or more, and the landlord had to discover her deteriorating after going in to collect overdue rent.
    1
  3762. OK, and, when the media points out that nobody saw this story until long after she was dead? And, when the point out the Freedom of Information Act? Then what? How do you manage to hold them "accountable" (for what?)?
    1
  3763. And, you'd believe that, why? This incident happened July 1, 2021. She was no longer alive in March of 2022. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She received ZERO broadcasting coverage while she was alive. ZERO.
    1
  3764. You feel sorry for her? Why? She went to that beach clearly with the intention of putting on a show in front of people (including children). What did you (or she) expect? Did you feel sorry for her other million arrests also? Or, just this one?
    1
  3765. But, they didn't. July 1, 2021 = arrest. March 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. You cannot humiliate a dead person.
    1
  3766. Um, no. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video was released. That's when things went viral. When she was alive, there were only a couple of obscure blogs about this incident. And, if you think she was humiliated by this, I have a bridge for sale, interested?
    1
  3767. Why do you believe her when she claims that she thought she was alone? Criminals say "I didn't do it" all the time.
    1
  3768. You haven't got the slightest clue what you're talking about. Before you "shame" people, how about learning something about the topic?
    1
  3769. Well, thankfully, we live in this thing called a "society." And, this "society" sets the standards for what's harmful, not you.
    1
  3770. They probably think that this Inside Edition story is a carefully crafted masterpiece of playing on words and obscuring relevant facts in order to paint the complete opposite picture as reality.
    1
  3771. No. Not even close. This video was never even made public until 1.5 years after her death. When one of these "news" stories uses "questions" as the story, and doesn't provide answers, that's the first clue that they're deceiving you.
    1
  3772. Dewdrop, the cops don't have any choice but to release a video if it's the result of a legal FOIA request. They can only hold it private if there's still an ongoing investigation. And, yes, they did exactly that. This video wasn't released for 2.5 years, which was also 1.5 years after her suicide. They could no longer deny the release of the video, because the woman was already dead, and the case was closed. Spare the world your obvious hatred. And, quit believing nonsense you see on YouTube. Good grief.
    1
  3773. Doubtful she was embarrassed by this.
    1
  3774. Well, she wasn't alive for all of the publicity anyway.
    1
  3775. But, it wasn't made public until she was dead 1.5 years. So, um, no.
    1
  3776. Blame the victims, not the criminal?
    1
  3777.  @honestbarcafan8259  What's your point? Cops shouldn't arrest people for any crime that's less than murder?
    1
  3778. Unknowingly? Did you read the police report? Or, did you blindly trust the stripper with the mile long arrest record and felony prison term when she said she didn't think anybody was around, as an attempt to avoid her millionth arrest?
    1
  3779. Yes, cops can use discretion for an infraction. Speeding = infraction, not a crime. Indecent exposure in front of minors = crime. Cops do not have discretion for a crime. That's the way our legal system is set up. For crimes, cops determine probable cause, and that's all. They don't get to make discretion calls.
    1
  3780. Sleeping in public is not illegal everywhere. And, where it is illegal, I just looked it up, and found that it's an infraction, not a crime. Now, I will grant you, I haven't looked up every county in the country. I just did a spot-check. But, the bottom line remains that you clearly have no idea about the law, and need to stop pretending you do.
    1
  3781. Here: "What is the difference between an infraction and a crime?" --- Google is your friend. Start there. It's very clear that you have absolutely no understanding of our legal system on any level at all.
    1
  3782.  @lovelykatelynn97  She gave up her realtor life about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. I doubt you can even be a real estate agent with her felony prison term and mile long arrest record. And, yes, her landlord and others said that she's a stripper. Sorry if this rains on your parade, but, you need to stop trusting trash news like Inside Edition.
    1
  3783.  @lovelykatelynn97  I can't tell if my prior reply is visible or not. But, you're welcome to look up the felony prison term the stripper served, or the mile long arrest history for other stuff.
    1
  3784. First of all, dewdrops, the timeline: July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = the arrest video was released.
    1
  3785. Secondly, there was no way she would have been put on any list for something this minor, if she had bothered to show up at court anyway. Even though she was a convicted felon who served time in prison, and had an arrest record a mile long for various other crimes, it's amazingly unlikely that this would have resulted in that. It would probably have resulted in getting negotiated down to a minor infraction, and she wouldn't have to register anything. But, she never showed up at court for this incident, which seemed to be the trend for how she handled all of her arrests, given the number of open warrants for failing to appear.
    1
  3786. It's always amazing to watch two people who understand absolutely nothing... agree with each other. It's like watching 4 year old kids talking about politics.
    1
  3787. Your original posted comment contained the line "releasing this video & causing her to take her own life." This is incorrect. Nobody saw the video while she was alive. Sorry, you don't get to backtrack and pretend you were correct while being incorrect. And, while you're entitled to your opinion about arrest footage in general, the Freedom of Information Act disagrees with you.
    1
  3788. And, why did you say, "just as a side note"? Did you try to post something else that's being blocked?
    1
  3789. Dewdrop, I wasn't the one spewing falsehood. YOU WERE.
    1
  3790. Again, I'm not the one spewing wrong information here, dewdrop.
    1
  3791. Already did that, dewdrop.
    1
  3792. How about this? Just stop pretending you know things that you don't? Is that really too much to ask in life?
    1
  3793. Dewdrop, the system already has many of the protections you're asking for. And, this case was one of those examples. You had your facts wrong from the start. And, it wasn't a "technicality." It was fundamental. Her privacy WAS protected for 2.5 years. Yet, you didn't know that, and your entire tirade was based upon the notion that her privacy wasn't protected. I've asked you to stop pretending to know things you don't. But, you're never going to learn. Your mind is too far gone.
    1
  3794. Nickname? What? Mine? It's the name of my former skydiving club/team. Guess which number I was.
    1
  3795. I just tried posting my real name. It's blocking it. About 50% of messages get blocked on this channel.
    1
  3796. You clearly will never stop pretending to know things you don't. I've asked you to stop doing that, but, you refuse. Yes, dewdrop, her privacy was protected to the extent of the law.
    1
  3797. Family? She had abandoned it about a decade ago, in favor of living a life of drugs and crime. There was nobody who even cared enough to know that she was gone. She was rotting away in her apartment until the landlord opened it up to go get the overdue rent. Literally NOBODY knew she was even gone, and NOBODY was looking for her. Family?
    1
  3798. Dignity? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she also did "private" encounters in her apartment for cash with numerous men. She served a felony prison term for stealing cars. And, she had a million arrests for various other stuff. Drug and alcohol charges. Other thefts. Failures to appear in court. You name it. And, the video taken by one of the "audience" differed completely from her version of a discreet act with nobody around. Quite the opposite. The witnesses say it was intentional, and in view of many people including children. Dignity?
    1
  3799. Thanks for making it clear that nobody can ever talk to you about anything. Your mind is immune to all input. It's the very living definition of delusion.
    1
  3800. That's how delusions work. You're the living definition.
    1
  3801. That's how delusions work. You're the living definition.
    1
  3802. Dewdrop, I'm not the one who was claiming that she took her own life because of the release of the arrest video, when the arrest video wasn't released until long after she was already dead. That's YOU who did that.
    1
  3803. What shame, though? Almost no media covered this story until long after she was dead.
    1
  3804. This incident = July 1, 2021. Her suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. Viral videos = the end of November 2023 through now. There were almost zero media outlets that covered this story while she was alive, and even then, it was just a couple of obscure blogs. She suffered nearly zero shame from them. And, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private" cash encounters out of her apartment, I'd say that "shame" probably wasn't in this woman's vocabulary in the first place. Plus, with her long criminal history, including a felony term in a Florida prison about 6 years ago, and a million other arrests, I really don't think this little arrest meant much to her. Or, if it was, why wait almost a year? And, what do you know that her own family didn't know? They said it was the drugs and alcohol and wild life of crime and partying that dragged her down, not this arrest. You know better?
    1
  3805. Oh, wait, I forgot... "Inside Edition (where facts don't matter) says that she was an innocent soccer mom, therefore I swallow every word hook line and sinker. All 3 cops were wrong, as were the innocent bystanders who caught the act on video. I want to blame the evil police and media for such a sweetheart's death, because Inside Edition told me to." Is that better?
    1
  3806. What choice did the cops have? Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3807. On what grounds?
    1
  3808. Open investigation vs. closed.
    1
  3809. Well, Inside Edition is certainly guilty of being rather deceptive with the facts. But, what did the police do wrong? They managed to keep the arrest video out of the public's eyes for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after her death. And, it was probably only made public as a result of a legal FOIA request. So, what's your lawsuit against the police based upon? Arresting her in the first place?
    1
  3810. Yeah, that's probably good advice. And, I'd imagine with her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, and million other arrests, she'd have known that. But, judging by the number of failures to appear in court, I'm guessing that she probably talked because she wanted to see if she could cry her way out of it before they looked up open warrants.
    1
  3811. Well, in most cases, you might be right. If there's not enough cause, they probably can't make an arrest. But, in this case, one of the "audience" recorded the incident and showed the video to the police. Their arrest report describes it very differently than the woman says as she's trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    1
  3812. How do you get permission from a dead person? You do know that nobody saw the arrest video until 1.5 years after she was already dead, right?
    1
  3813. Huh? She was one of those criminals.
    1
  3814. It was a media setup in the first place. The arrest video was released on November 24, 2023. She had been dead since March of 2022. So, the first round of the arrest video simply never mentioned that she was already dead. So, in the second round, they revealed that she was dead, without saying that they had known it all along, and instead let people believe that the release of the arrest video caused the suicide. Whenever they ask questions without providing the answers, you know it's a red flag that you're being manipulated.
    1
  3815. Almost zero media even covered this while she was alive. So, um, no.
    1
  3816. What do you mean "again after her death"? No news station spread it before she was dead either.
    1
  3817. What exactly do you think was broadcasted that humiliated her?
    1
  3818. The Freedom of Information Act is what released the video. But, it wasn't released until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. So, no, there was no humiliation from the arrest video. So, again, I ask, what exactly do you think was broadcasted that humiliated her?
    1
  3819. So, your position is that the convicted felon who served time in prison, and had a million arrests and other judgements, was embarrassed by this arrest? Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" sessions in her apartment for cash with numerous men. The witnesses at the beach said that it looked like she was intentionally putting on a show in front of multiple people including children, and even took video of the incident and showed it to the cops. But, your position is that this one little tiny arrest has "shamed" her? Man, I don't think this woman knew what the word "shame" meant. And, none of her other million arrests or her prison term caused her suicide. But, THIS one did?
    1
  3820. Well, she was already dead for 1.5 years before they released it. They can't continue to block Freedom of Information Act requests after the case was closed for that long.
    1
  3821. What would you propose instead? Lie to her?
    1
  3822. Of Special Edition shouldn't of done of what? Who is of accountable of her of death if not of herself? Special Edition of didn't show of any videos until of she was already of dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3823. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  3824. Huh? How should the cops have arrested her instead of how they did it? And, sorry, but social media didn't get involved until she was already dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3825. Why was the arrest video released? Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3826. The goal? To be compliant with the Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3827. Humiliation? Over what? The arrest video? It wasn't released until November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. Nobody saw it while she was alive.
    1
  3828. Feelings about being arrested? Huh? She never killed herself over any of her prior million arrests, why would this one bother her that much? She didn't kill herself when she was serving felony time in a Florida prison. According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. According to her neighbors, she also did "private" cash encounters out of her apartment. This hardly seems to me like a woman who feels humiliated when "exposed."
    1
  3829. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  3830. Really, dewdrop? Have you looked into the mirror? Good gods.
    1
  3831. Yeah, you'd think she would have been used to the cuffs by that point in her life.
    1
  3832. Yes, spoken like a true believer in everything Inside Edition has to feed, much like pigs lining up at the garbage trough. Multiple people called about this incident. The witnesses said that she was doing this intentionally. One witness recorded it and showed it to the police. The video shows a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. Oh, but, you say she thought she was alone, right? Because, criminals never lie to the police when faced with their millionth arrest, and the possibility of returning to prison again, right? With her time in prison, and her arrest record a mile long, SHE's the trustworthy one here, not the innocent bystanders who reported her. And, her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors say she did "private" encounters for cash with numerous men in her apartment. But, again, SHE is the one to be trusted when she said she was alone, not the multiple people who called. And, dewdrop, July 1, 2021 = this arrest. Suicide = March, 2022. Arrest video released = November 24, 2023. So, no, nobody broadcasted anything to the world until long after she was dead. While she was alive, there were one or two blog entries on a couple of obscure websites that publish lots of arrest records, but, let's face reality here, virtually nobody saw them, and she should have been very used to being arrested by then. But, nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. But, you keep on watching Inside Edition, where facts don't matter. It's doing wonders for your reasoning skills.
    1
  3833. Of she? Well, of I find it of hard to of believe that of people get put of on those lists of because of that. I of think that of people pretend that's of the reason of they're on those lists, because of they don't of want to reveal of the real of reason they're of on the lists of of.
    1
  3834.  Toyotacorollaaltis-cn9fd  Right. Sure. And, there was nothing more to the story, huh? I have a bridge for sale, interested?
    1
  3835. Probably not an issue. Those multiple people probably know darned well that this is a heavily modified and edited version of the story that is skewed to make people believe falsehoods.
    1
  3836. And, you believe she was shamed like that, why? Because Inside Edition said so?
    1
  3837. Freedom of Information Act. But, at least the poor woman never suffered from the release of the arrest video. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody saw it.
    1
  3838. Inside Edition says so, therefore it's true.
    1
  3839. Well, then maybe you'll be glad to learn that this wasn't one mistake. She was a convicted felon who served time in prison for stealing cars, and had an arrest record a mile long for other thefts, drug and alcohol charges, failures to appear in court, you name it. She ruined her own life long before this incident.
    1
  3840. They're probably well aware never to trust an Inside Edition story, unlike you.
    1
  3841. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3842. Well, first of all, why do you believe she thought she was alone? Because she said so, as she was trying to whine he way out of her millionth arrest? Secondly, why would you say they "handled it publicly"? They took her away from the restaurant to question her, outside of the earshot of any onlookers. And, they blocked the release of the arrest video for as long as they could, and nobody saw it until 2.5 years later (she was long dead by then). What more do you expect here?
    1
  3843. So, that's it then? I asked a couple of questions. You refused to answer?
    1
  3844. "Shortly after" = almost a year later?
    1
  3845. "someone's daughter" Huh? She abandoned her family and career more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs instead. Her husband and son didn't even go to her funeral.
    1
  3846. "someone's best friend" Really? Why do you suppose nobody was looking for her? She sat in that apartment, decomposing, and nobody even tried to get in touch with her. It wasn't until her landlord went in looking for the overdue rent that she was found. They don't know, but estimate that she was dead a month. Absolutely NOBODY even knew she was gone.
    1
  3847. I don't lack sympathy. But, yes, I hold people accountable for their own actions, and I don't falsely blame others for her own choices.
    1
  3848. I'm not the one who can't answer questions, dewdrop. That's YOU. You claimed that this was handled publicly. It wasn't. You don't know what you're talking about, then, you doubled down on not knowing what you're talking about.
    1
  3849. Can you name any social media that published anything about this while she was still alive?
    1
  3850. I have a bridge for sale if you actually believe she thought she was in a private area. Why would you believe it? Because she said so as she was being arrested for the millionth time?
    1
  3851. No, dewdrop. She killed herself. And, yes, dewdrop. Cuffing is part of every arrest.
    1
  3852. Yes, but, the facts don't line up with that belief.
    1
  3853. Huh? WHAT was "all because of it being recorded and her face staying unblurred"? I fail to understand what you're attributing to this video?
    1
  3854. Were you under the impression that this posting made any sense?
    1
  3855. Huh? They BLOCKED the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw it while she was alive. And, it was only released due to a Freedom of Information Act request (no choice).
    1
  3856. Nope. There were no videos about this before she died.
    1
  3857. Who did? Who is "they"?
    1
  3858. Well, maybe if she bothered to show in court, they could have mandated the counseling you're requesting.
    1
  3859. Well, she abandoned her family over a decade ago to live a life of drugs and crime. When she died, nobody was even looking for her, because it wasn't discovered until the landlord went in looking for rent. The medical examiner said she was well into the maggot phase of decomposition, and had been reduced to 84 pounds. That's how long she was missing with absolutely nobody looking for her.
    1
  3860. The arrest video wasn't uploaded anywhere until 2.5 years later. She was long dead by then.
    1
  3861. Sounds nice. But, what for?
    1
  3862. "Put on the S.O.R." Even with her extensive arrest history, her time spent in prison 6 years ago, etc., this particular incident was unlikely to result in her being put on any lists. If she had bothered to show up in court, this probably would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction. But, it appears that her method of dealing with all of her judgements and charges was to simply stop showing up.
    1
  3863. Oh, and I forgot... you do know that one of the audience recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police, right? You do know it differs from her version of a quiet and discreet act with nobody around, right?
    1
  3864. Tell me, if it was a man at a playground, would you advise people to just take their children to a different playground, and never call the police? You do know that's why we pay police in the first place, right? To tend to crimes, right?
    1
  3865. Spare the world, seriously. Had she bothered to show up in court, 99% odds that this would have easily been negotiated down to a minor infraction, even with her extensive criminal history.
    1
  3866. So, all a criminal has to do is whine and cry, and you believe her?
    1
  3867. Ticket = infraction. Arrest = crime. There's a difference between an infraction and a crime. Suit? Just checking here, you do know this news media never covered this story until 1.5 years after her death, right?
    1
  3868. What did you predict and when?
    1
  3869. Yes, but they learned the wrong lesson. They learned that manipulating stories to create a false narrative results in lots of money.
    1
  3870. Huh? Her arrest wasn't publicized so much until 1.5 years after she died. I'm sorry if you think Inside Edition is a reliable source of information... but... um, no.
    1
  3871. Well, maybe. But, let's face reality here for a minute. The woman weighed 86 pounds at the time of her death, and was on welfare, and couldn't make her rent payments. This was the path she was on. I certainly cannot say that I knew her (I didn't), but, I also know not to just blindly trust media stories designed to generate ad revenue. It sounds like her life may have been going downhill for a while. I mean, how do her two teenage kids go 12 days and not even know she was dead, unless they were already estranged to some degree (another sign of her life taking a bad turn)? I'm definitely with you on the notion that her arrest video shouldn't have gone public. But, personally, I can't attribute her suicide to one incident like that.
    1
  3872. You remember from 3 years ago?
    1
  3873. How many people even knew about this arrest before she died?
    1
  3874. But, this video wasn't released until November 24, 2023. Her suicide was two years ago.
    1
  3875. So, you want them fired for abiding by a legal FOIA request?
    1
  3876. On what basis?
    1
  3877. Because you believe Inside Edition?
    1
  3878. A warning for an aggravated misdemeanor for a convicted felon with open warrants? Huh? And, sorry, but the arrest video wasn't published until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3879. Um, ok, how do you prevent it? Repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    1
  3880. Huh? The convicted felon with a mile long arrest list, and a term spent in a Florida prison? The one who walked out on her own family more than a decade ago (including a 6 month old son) to live a life of drugs and crime? Good one?
    1
  3881. Is there already an app for dating felony prisoners? Sounds like you should make one.
    1
  3882. Dewdrop, just admit you don't know anything. It makes this far easier.
    1
  3883. Why this arrest, though? I mean, her suicide was 9 months later, not 2 months later. But, whatever. Why this arrest, and none of her other million arrests? She didn't commit suicide when she went to prison about 6 years ago. She didn't commit suicide for any of her other arrests since then. But, your position is that this little minor arrest made her commit suicide? Had she bothered to show up in court (which she didn't, as usual), this probably would have either been thrown out, or negotiated down to a minor infraction. And, almost nobody knew about this incident until long after she was dead, so, she didn't experience much shame here (contrary to Inside Edition's false portrayal). Did she even know what shame was anyway? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club. So, I wouldn't think she'd feel ashamed about being exposed.
    1
  3884. First of all, you should learn a little something about how these investigations work. Secondly, yes, one of the "audience" took video of the incident. It's described in the arrest report.
    1
  3885. Nice attitude. Your parents must be proud.
    1
  3886.  @Trina-rg7fi  Huh? Multiple people called. One of them recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her version about nobody being around. To the contrary, it was a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. And, if she gets so humiliated by being arrested, maybe she should have stopped committing so many crimes, huh? She did a felony prison term in Florida, and had a million other arrests.
    1
  3887. Yeah, but, it wasn't going to matter whether she said anything or not. One of the "audience" had it on video, and showed it to the police. Needless to say, the video didn't match this story she's telling about a discreet act with nobody around, as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest. Plus, with all of the open warrants for her failures to appear in court for prior arrests, she was going to get arrested no matter what she said or didn't say.
    1
  3888. Another proud believer in anything Inside Edition says. Bravo!
    1
  3889. Inside Edition is the channel you're watching. They made this deceptive video.
    1
  3890. I completely agree. The only saving grace (which isn't worth much) is that the poor woman didn't need to suffer any shame while she was alive. The arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she died.
    1
  3891. With her criminal history? Um, yeah, that's an arrest all the way. And, sure, even though she was a convicted felon who served time in prison and had a million other arrests, you're probably correct, it would almost certainly be negotiated down to an infraction with minor service and/or seeing a counselor. But, of course, she didn't show up at court, soooo....
    1
  3892. Really? Arrest only if she's combative? Do you have any concept of what "probable cause" means? Do you actually know how police determine whether to make an arrest or not?
    1
  3893. Really? You think you get a "notice to appear" or a "subpoena" for crimes? Or, maybe you think it's an infraction where you get a ticket? For crimes, they perform an arrest.
    1
  3894. Really? You want the adults to just go up to her and ask her to stop? Tell me, would you do that if it was a man at a playground?
    1
  3895. Really? A deliberate display wasn't her intention? So, please explain why a woman in the "audience" was able to record the incident with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police? The police then described the video in their arrest report as a very loud and public act in view of multiple people including children. But, your version is that this was a discreet act with nobody around. You're saying that, why? Because a woman said so while trying to avoid being arrested again?
    1
  3896. Why? Because Inside Edition asked the question? A couple of minor blogs mentioned this arrest, and she committed suicide over it? Why? For being "exposed"? Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Seems like she'd be used to "being exposed" by then, huh?
    1
  3897. You should be charged with libel.
    1
  3898. Huh? Yes, it was. EDIT: Sorry, I misread your message, and thought you were asking why it wasn't broadcasted. My bad. My apologies.
    1
  3899. Unjustified hatred from ignorant people strikes again.
    1
  3900. Can you name a news station that even covered this story when she was still alive?
    1
  3901. Inside Edition said it, you believe it.
    1
  3902. The news never showed her at all until long after she was dead. And, Freedom of Information Act. Your suit has no merit.
    1
  3903. Oh, I think they're paying her a heck of a lot of respect. They're painting the false picture of the innocent soccer mom busted by evil police. The "convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons" version doesn't go viral. As for the rest of what you wrote, I have no idea what you're talking about, and neither do you.
    1
  3904. And, if she wanted respect from her family, maybe she shouldn't have walked out on them more than a decade ago in favor of living a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  3905. She was a real estate agent more than a decade ago. She gave that up to live a life of crime instead. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the local gentlemen's club, and neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment.
    1
  3906. Open investigations vs. closed investigations. There's a difference.
    1
  3907. Um, ok, but, how is that relevant here? The arrest video wasn't released until she was dead for 1.5 years.
    1
  3908. Huh? How was she honest? One of the "audience" recorded the incident and gave a copy to the police. It doesn't match her version. It was a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children, unlike her sob story about nobody being around (as she's trying to avoid her millionth arrest).
    1
  3909. Welcome to Inside Edition, where facts don't matter.
    1
  3910. You're doing what you do best: pretending to understand things you don't.
    1
  3911. No. "Innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" goes viral and gets millions of hits. "Convicted felon who can't stop getting herself arrested, gets arrested again, and commits suicide a year later for unrelated reasons" doesn't go viral.
    1
  3912. The arrest video wasn't uploaded anywhere until 2.5 years later. Nobody saw it while she was alive. And, the Freedom of Information Act is the reason it was eventually released. So, blame congress?
    1
  3913. How about blaming the criminal for her own crimes? No?
    1
  3914. Who's the suit against, and on what basis?
    1
  3915. So, if you're the police, how do you prevent the release if it's the result of a legal Freedom of Information Act request? And, just checking here... you do know that it wasn't released until 1.5 years after she was already dead, right?
    1
  3916. Arrest = July 1, 2021 Suicide = March, 2022 (uncertain date) Body found = March 31, 2022 Arrest video made public = November 24, 2023 Sorry for reality.
    1
  3917. Freedom of Information Act.
    1
  3918. Yeah, like having obnoxious nicknames, right? What she did wasn't disgusting for its own sake, it was disgusting that she did it in front of children.
    1
  3919. Well, you could try to FOIA the video of the incident itself, but, I think they still have that one blocked due to content.
    1
  3920. What family and friends would those be? The ones that didn't even know she was dead, because they had zero contact with her? And, what humiliation? Who even knew about this arrest while she was alive?
    1
  3921. Blame the victim?
    1
  3922. Who do you blame, if not the criminal?
    1
  3923. Ah. Yes. It has to do with the difference between an infraction and a crime.
    1
  3924. Infraction = police can decide, and have discretion, tickets, fines, etc.
    1
  3925. Crime = police do not use discretion. They make the arrest, and then the courts take it from there.
    1
  3926. Sorry, it kept blocking my replies, and I had to keep it super short, skipping a ton of stuff, and dividing it into multiple replies, or it wouldn't post.
    1
  3927. Yes, but, somehow I think you're being sarcastic.
    1
  3928. You're wrong, but, we'll pretend you're correct for a minute. Why is it wrong to arrest her if there's enough probable cause? They found the toy in her bag. She told them that she used it on the beach. Even if she could later prove that there was some other factor that somehow made her innocent, the arrest was justified. Remember, an arrest is just an arrest. It's not a trial and conviction.
    1
  3929. Secondly, multiple people called the police. The police didn't go there because of an anonymous tip. Read the police report. They list some of the witnesses by name, and they interviewed multiple people. One of the "audience" had even recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. They describe the video in the arrest report as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children.
    1
  3930. Why did you say it was an anonymous tip? And, what's the basis for the suit you propose?
    1
  3931. Then you file a report to escalate. And, if that fails, you call the sheriff instead of police. And, if that fails, you escalate to the FBI. But, forgive me if I don't blindly accept the story, but, sometimes the police can't do much if it's "he said she said" with no evidence. In this case, one of the audience took video of the incident, and gave a copy to the police, so there was not a lack of evidence.
    1
  3932. Again, I'm not just going to blindly accept your story just because you repeat it. And, I already outlined your recourse. Why did you not take it?
    1
  3933. Yeah, I totally believe you now. Police don't do their jobs even when it's completely obvious. It outrages you, but, you do nothing whatsoever about it. Sure. By the way, I'm shopping for a bridge, do you have one for sale?
    1
  3934. You seem to have missed the point: if they don't show the pretty face, it doesn't go viral and they lose ad revenue.
    1
  3935. The arrest video wasn't released until long after she was dead. But, you keep on pretending to know things you don't.
    1
  3936. Freedom of Information Act. The one "silver lining" (though minor) is that at least she wasn't alive to ever see the arrest video go public.
    1
  3937. Huh? You want it to be legal to crank in public in front of children?
    1
  3938. Is this a joke? She was a convicted felon with an extensive criminal record, and a term spent in a Florida prison about 6 years ago. She walked out on her family (including a 6 month old boy), in order to live a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  3939. What embarrassment? First of all, virtually nobody even knew about this arrest until 1.5 years after she died. None of this went viral until after the release of the arrest video (November 24, 2023). She died more than 2 years ago. Secondly, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. That's not exactly the right business to be in, if she gets "embarrassed" over stuff like this.
    1
  3940. The police say the video of the incident clearly shows a very loud and public show in view of multiple people including children. Innocent bystanders reported that she did this intentionally. But, you'll stick with the claims of the convicted felon?
    1
  3941. Good grief, just stop trusting trash news like Inside Edition. Sheeesssshhh.
    1
  3942. I'll eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest before they'd look up all of her open warrants.
    1
  3943. Huh? Sounds like she intentionally put on a show in front of multiple people. I mean, you didn't actually believe her when she said she thought nobody was around, did you? If so, I have a bridge for sale.
    1
  3944. Because the arrest video wasn't released until November 24, 2023.
    1
  3945. Yeah, I agree. I was just giving you the literal reason why it's being posted now instead of 2.5 years ago.
    1
  3946. Who is "they"? And, what's your evidence?
    1
  3947. Dewdrop, this was never on TV before she died. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Not a single TV station or YouTube channel covered anything about this incident while she was still alive.
    1
  3948. But, this was never on TV when she was alive.
    1
  3949. No, you didn't. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released. Stop lying.
    1
  3950. July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released.
    1
  3951. The department of sanitation? The Department of Homeland Security? The department store? Certainly you cannot mean the police department.
    1
  3952. Virtually zero media ran anything about this story while she was alive.
    1
  3953. Wow. You really drank the Kool-Aid. First of all, multiple people called the police. One woman in the "audience" recorded this incident on her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. The arrest report describes it as a very loud act in front of multiple people, including children. So, yeah, sorry, I think I'd believe the unbiased random people who saw it, recorded it, and the police reported on it, before I'll believe the words of a woman with a mile long arrest and prison record who is attempting to avoid getting arrested (yet again). You said, "she said no one was even around." Yeah. She did say that. "I didn't do it" is a very common stance that many criminals try to take when being arrested. So what? And, sorry, but the only blood is on her own hands. This arrest had absolutely nothing to do with her suicide. But, yeah, you blindly trusted Inside Edition also, right? I don't know what good this will do, but, here goes: guess what? Not everything you see on YouTube is actually true. You might want to keep that in mind as you go through life.
    1
  3954. Yes, dewdrop. We call police to do the jobs we pay them to do. And, July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = arrest video released due to FOIA request. Sorry, your suit goes nowhere.
    1
  3955. Of course not. She wandered up and down the beach, and plopped right down in view of multiple people (including children). One of the audience recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police, who described it as a very loud show. No, not discreet at all. But, were you expecting discretion? Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (that kind, yes) at the local club, and neighbors said she "did private extras" with parades of paying men in her apartment. I don't think "discretion" was part of her vocabulary.
    1
  3956.  @charhudson8350  Well, first of all, other than a couple hundred hits on a couple of obscure blogs nobody has heard of, how much internet publicity do you think she actually got before she was dead? 99.999% of the coverage happened only after she died. Secondly, none of her other million arrests, nor her felony term in a Florida prison, had any effect on her? No? It was just THIS arrest that had an effect?
    1
  3957. Noisily? What? And, the Freedom of Information Act released the video. But, that wasn't until 1.5 years after she was already dead. Bravo! You're batting 0.000. Want to try again?
    1
  3958. What light would you rather it be aired? Seems like this version is pretty charitable to her. Would you rather they told the accurate version, including her mile long criminal history, time spent in prison, and that she walked out on her family and friends more than a decade ago, etc.?
    1
  3959. Not likely. Even with her history of being a convicted felon who served time in prison, and her arrest record a mile long, it's very likely that this incident would have been negotiated down to a minor infraction... had she bothered to show up in court anyway.
    1
  3960. Well, the arrest video wasn't released until long after she died. But, ok, I'll play your game. You have your suit now, ok? The news stations say, "Freedom of Information Act" in reply to your suit. Now what? What's your next move?
    1
  3961. Ad revenue.
    1
  3962. I see so many people posting this sentiment, yet, none of you people ever says exactly what was handled wrongly, or what they should have done differently.
    1
  3963. Well, at least the arrest video was never posted while she was alive.
    1
  3964. First of all, had she bothered to show up in court, this would probably be negotiated down to a minor infraction. Secondly, she ruined her own life a decade ago when she abandoned her career and family in favor of living a life of crime and drugs.
    1
  3965. Hilarious!! You blindly believe the words of a convicted felon with a million other arrests and a term spent in a Florida prison, rather than the multiple innocent bystanders who called when they saw a misdemeanor. One of the "audience" recorded it, and gave a copy to the police. Shocker, the video doesn't match her claims about nobody being around. She had a criminal history a mile long. Stealing cars. Drugs and alcohol. Other thefts. Failures to appear. And, after all of that, yeah, it's tough to maintain a straight job, so, her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. Neighbors said she did "private extras" for cash in her apartment. If she wasn't making "public beach" content, but got reported, and was trying to cry her way out of her millionth arrest, I'll eat my hat.
    1
  3966. Yes, multiple people called about this incident. And, one took video. Needless to say, it didn't match the version the woman was pretending about, as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to end up back in prison again. With her long criminal history, I'm sure she knew to keep her mouth shut. But, I'm guessing with all of her open warrants, she probably knew that remaining silent would just mean that they'd check her records, so, perhaps she figured that talking her way out of it was the better thing to try.
    1
  3967. On what grounds? When the "news" says "Freedom of Information Act," what happens to your suit? When the police say, "we didn't release the arrest video until 2.5 years later, long after she died, and, at that point, we only released it as mandated by a FOIA request," then what happens to your suit?
    1