Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "TomoNews US" channel.

  1.  @RADIUMGLASS  YOU SAID: "it would have been an honor to walk over their worthless lifeless bodies." == Well, it seems that Smith may have done more than that. After all, he said "cute" after killing the girl, and then didn't report it until 24 hours later, and the girl was found with her shirt open (make of that what you will).
    4
  2. It's ALL of their fault!!! The man knew the kids were coming, and planned the murders.
    2
  3. Yes, he knew the teens were coming, and prepared tarps for their bodies where he planned on murdering them.
    2
  4. Not likely. The kids' phones probably would have allowed them to triangulate their last known positions.
    1
  5. Wrong. He should have called the cops months before, as soon as he knew who was repeatedly robbing him. Or, minimally, he should have called the cops on that day and asked them to come help them catch the teens in the act.
    1
  6.  @cheesemanthe2nd  Um, yes, that's correct. So, in your mind, executing them is justified? The crime of theft carries the "justified" punishment of death?
    1
  7. Is this a joke?
    1
  8. Really? What should he have gotten instead? Death sentence?
    1
  9. Yes, he planned the murders in advance, and recorded himself committing the murders.
    1
  10. Well, then he should have called the police BEFORE the teens got there, right?
    1
  11.  @dougstyles  What ARE you talking about? So, your solution is to just gun people down without even trying to call the police?
    1
  12.  @dougstyles  Pffttt. No solution? How about CALLING THE POLICE!?!?!?! How can you say that's NOT a solution? I said the solution was to call the police. You just outright rejected it. How ridiculous can you be? How about, "Hello, police, you know those robberies I reported a while back? Well, I bought cameras, I identified who is doing it, I can prove it via the cameras, and because the girl is wearing my stolen flight jacket to high school. They're coming back today to rob me again. Can you send someone here to help catch them in the act?" No? That's NOT a solution? Instead, you "don't blame him" (your words) for planning two murders, and following through on that plan? How sick are you? What's wrong with you? No solution?
    1
  13. No. There was a pretty big amount of time between the two murders. The boy went in first. Smith killed him, gathered up his body into the tarp he had prepared, moved it to the other room, then reset the room with a fresh tarp for when the girl would come in. He watched on his video monitors for when she was on her way in. If memory serves, I think it was about 10 minutes later.
    1
  14. Bingo. Congratulations on being one of the rare sane ones in these threads. It seems that most people who comment in these threads seem to think one party must be innocent, and the other party must be guilty. These are people who can't think straight, and fail to realize that *ALL THREE* were guilty.
    1
  15. Man, c'mon, they were TEENS!!! Yeah, I'm not losing sleep over these teen druggie criminal thieves. But, sheeeesssshhhh. 17 years old?? Are you REALLY that heartless? The crime of theft means that teens must be murdered?
    1
  16. It goes well past "defending his own home" when he planned two murders in advance.
    1
  17. Um, no. Not even close. The teens were guilty, AND Smith was guilty. Two guilty teen thieves got killed by a guilty murderer.
    1
  18.  @justsomeguy892  I believe Loremaster is just kidding. (If not, wow, off the charts crazy.)
    1