Comments by "александр макаров" (@user-lj2vy1mw1l) on "Good Times Bad Times" channel.

Amazing arrogance. Both world wars ensured the dominance of the United States, while in both cases the United States was not the country that made the decisive contribution to victory. England and France did this in the First World War, and the USSR in the second.
4
@John_Kennedy27 Russia does not conscript people; now they volunteer to join the army. In general, more than 90% of Russian residents do not feel this war at all. Do you understand? Ukraine has used all its resources, people are literally being grabbed on the street and sent to the front, Europe and the USA have already sent more money than the USSR received through Lend-Lease during the Second World War, but at the same time Ukraine is still losing.
4
@yakovlevskiy Russia had the following plans at the beginning of the war: 1) The most successful was a change in the government of Ukraine 2) Drawing Ukraine into negotiations and obtaining its promise not to join the US alliance. 3) If these two options fail to fight. Initially, no one was going to annex parts of Ukraine and the lands were not the reason for the war. As for Stalin’s letters about joining Germany, this is complete nonsense. Please indicate the sources of this nonsense.
3
@giovanni-ed7zq As a Russian, I can say with confidence that we do not have any hyperinflation
3
@giovanni-ed7zq чел... Когда началась война рубль стоил 100 рублей или около того. Сейчас, спустя почти три года. Он стоит столько же. Я не спорю что в РФ есть инфляция, но она есть почти везде и у нас не гиперинфляция. Прочитай уже определение и посмотри примеры чтобы не задавать глупых вопросов.
3
@PJ-om2wq I am amazed at your ignorance. Maidan activists seized the Verkhovna Rada, violating agreements with Yanukovych, and only then, under their pressure, the parliament ousted Yanukovych for an absolutely far-fetched reason.
2
@PJ-om2wq This is not rudeness, but a statement of fact. Understand that you are ignorant, and when I write this, I am not insulting you, but only stating the obvious, because you are writing an absolute lie here, which is checked in a second.
2
@PJ-om2wq Yanukovych reaches an agreement with the opposition (Maidan), withdraws troops from the city, on the same day the opposition violates the agreements, captures the government quarter, after which, under their pressure, the parliament removes Yanukovych. You can check it at any time. As you can see, there was a coup in Kiev, which caused unrest in the east of the country.
2
@PJ-om2wq No offense, but calling you ignorant is just stating a fact. And you just confirmed it. Moreover, you deliberately ignore the seizure of the government quarter by Maidan forces on the night of February 22, I recommend that you study this issue more carefully than just studying Wikipedia. And the question is how Yanukovych's "flight" was supposed to be the reason for his removal, which also occurred in violation of local legislation.
2
@WhiteBirdPlays In the Kursk Region, Ukrainians occupied less than 3% of the territory. They didn't take a single city, but they killed thousands of the most motivated soldiers. Their last attempt to advance there about a week ago ended in complete failure. What kind of success can we talk about?
2
The US has attacked Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria over the past 30 years. At the same time, for some reason you are afraid of Russia, which began to act only when Ukraine violated past agreements. At the same time, as soon as Ukraine started talking about peace, the Russian Federation immediately started negotiations. Who intervened in them and convinced Kyiv to sabotage them? Oh yes, European countries.
2
@giovanni-ed7zq but you don't live in Russia. You don't know about the benefits system, that there are different banks, that a lot depends on the initial payment. You don't know anything. You don't even know what hyperinflation is...
2
The USSR destroyed more than 80% of all German ground forces, which is literally millions of people. England and the USA arrived in France when it became obvious that Germany would lose.
1
@TimD-ny6ks Soviet troops destroyed more than 80% of Germany's forces in World War II. Lend-Lease, according to the most favorable estimates for the United States, amounted to 15% of what the USSR itself produced. For comparison, England received several times more Lend-Lease than the USSR and did not do anything. So throw out your tales about the unified army.
1
@Utrilus России бы вполне хватило нейтральной Украины и обещания не вступления в НАТО. В общем-то и эта война бы не началась если бы 1) Украина соблюдала Минские Соглашения( а она из них вышла) 2) Не возобновила бы своё наступление на Донбасс 3) Пообещала бы не вступать в НАТО.
1
@usa_bruce The USSR, China, England and the USA. At the same time, China has been fighting Japan the longest.
1
@ Actually, Japan's land army was depleted by China, and the USSR finished it off. The merit of the USA and England in the destruction of the Japanese fleet. The role of China and the USSR should not be underestimated.
1
@sjoormen1 Don't be embarrassed. The USSR defeated the million-strong Kwantung army in August 1945. The Manchurian operation
1
@sjoormen1 No. Watch the Manchurian operation and don't talk any more nonsense.
1
@PJ-om2wq Maidan also illegally overthrew the previous government. The actions of the East of Ukraine are the answer; it turns out that this conflict began precisely because of the Maidan.
1
@PJ-om2wq On February 21, Yanukovych and the opposition agree to end the confrontation and hold new elections. Yanukovych withdraws his forces from Kyiv. The detainees are released. Already at night, representatives of the Maidan seize the Rada and the government quarter. And only after, under their pressure, Yanukovych is removed from power. As you can see, Yanukovych was overthrown by force, and this is what caused unrest in the east of the country, where the bulk of Yanukovych’s electorate was. Note that he even agreed to early elections. Now do you understand how wrong you were?
1
@PJ-om2wq By calling you ignorant, I'm stating a fact. And you just confirmed it by reading Wikipedia and not seeing my correctness. So. I see you don't deny the seizure of Rada. It's already good. Now for the rest of the points. Reducing press freedom is a blatant lie. A whole bunch of UKRAINIAN channels muddied Yanukovych's entire Maidan. I wonder how this fits in with the reduction of freedom of speech? Timoshenka's landing? She was imprisoned for the very corruption that existed long before Yanukovych and increased significantly after him. A puppet? In general, it's funny, he tried to play both sides, and up to a certain point very successfully, but refused from the association 1) Because it brought little benefit 2) the Russian Federation offered much better conditions. Oh, yes. A significant part of the people did not want this very association. Hence their actions in the east and south of the country. And now, tell me why their actions are terrorism for you, but the seizure of a government building and the overthrow of the president are not. I see rotten hypocrisy here... Or banal ignorance. So what is it?
1
@Wallyworld30 Why did you bother with history if you don’t understand anything? Russia and Ukraine jointly emerged from the ancient state called Rus. And no, Kyiv became part of the Russian kingdom in the 17th century, not the 18th. Don’t go where you don’t know anything.
1
@DontFeedTheTrolls Peace? It's funny. Do you know that it was Russia that proposed the Minsk agreements, which would allow the Donbass to be returned to Ukraine peacefully if it complied with them. Do you know what Merkel, Poroshenko and Zelensky said about them? Each of them said that they were not going to implement them from the beginning and were simply using them to stall for time so that Ukraine would arm itself. So who actually pursued the policy of appeasement?
1
@ The main role in Europe was played by the USSR. And he received from the United States about 10% (at best) of the output from what he did in general. As I said, it's an amazing conceit.
1
@Soldier2103x There were approximately 150 thousand in Africa. To understand, in the USSR in 1941 the Germans assembled an army of 4 million. Moreover, until 1943, most of the aviation also operated on the Eastern Front. So let's be honest - no, the USSR played the main role.
1
@ Your message is saturated with hypocrisy. So if the country is not in Europe, then attacking it is normal. Disgusting. You probably are not aware that now in Syria the new government supported by the US and Europe is massively slaughtering entire religious and ethnic groups. Where is the reaction of Europe and the USA to the genocide in Syria? And yes, since you mentioned the purges, I can say that the actions of the Russian Federation were made to prevent Ukraine from striking the rebellious republics, to prevent mass murders, for which Ukraine is famous.
1
@ сегодня суббота, выходной, можно и развлечься, высказывая этим невежам правду)
1
The author of the video is disingenuous, since Ukraine also relies on railways. Moreover, the railways are quite easy to restore, so few people will spend expensive missiles on them, in general, Russia is guided by the same logic in relation to the railways of Ukraine.
1
@giovanni-ed7zq I'm not lying. You just don't know what hyperinflation is because of your poor education. You can search for definitions right now and understand how wrong you are.
1
@giovanni-ed7zq The rates depend on the bank. It can be from 6 to 28 percent. It depends on several factors.
1
@ Do you understand what hyper-inflation is? This is a huge rise in prices and depreciation of money. In Russia, there is no price increase of 100% or more, so we do not have hyper-inflation. You didn't guess about eggs either, there's a different chain there, caused a lot by the increase in the price of feed.
1