Comments by "александр макаров" (@user-lj2vy1mw1l) on "Will Ukraine Be ‘Betrayed’?" video.

@PJ-om2wq I am amazed at your ignorance. Maidan activists seized the Verkhovna Rada, violating agreements with Yanukovych, and only then, under their pressure, the parliament ousted Yanukovych for an absolutely far-fetched reason.
2
@PJ-om2wq This is not rudeness, but a statement of fact. Understand that you are ignorant, and when I write this, I am not insulting you, but only stating the obvious, because you are writing an absolute lie here, which is checked in a second.
2
@PJ-om2wq Yanukovych reaches an agreement with the opposition (Maidan), withdraws troops from the city, on the same day the opposition violates the agreements, captures the government quarter, after which, under their pressure, the parliament removes Yanukovych. You can check it at any time. As you can see, there was a coup in Kiev, which caused unrest in the east of the country.
2
@PJ-om2wq No offense, but calling you ignorant is just stating a fact. And you just confirmed it. Moreover, you deliberately ignore the seizure of the government quarter by Maidan forces on the night of February 22, I recommend that you study this issue more carefully than just studying Wikipedia. And the question is how Yanukovych's "flight" was supposed to be the reason for his removal, which also occurred in violation of local legislation.
2
@PJ-om2wq Maidan also illegally overthrew the previous government. The actions of the East of Ukraine are the answer; it turns out that this conflict began precisely because of the Maidan.
1
@PJ-om2wq On February 21, Yanukovych and the opposition agree to end the confrontation and hold new elections. Yanukovych withdraws his forces from Kyiv. The detainees are released. Already at night, representatives of the Maidan seize the Rada and the government quarter. And only after, under their pressure, Yanukovych is removed from power. As you can see, Yanukovych was overthrown by force, and this is what caused unrest in the east of the country, where the bulk of Yanukovych’s electorate was. Note that he even agreed to early elections. Now do you understand how wrong you were?
1
@PJ-om2wq By calling you ignorant, I'm stating a fact. And you just confirmed it by reading Wikipedia and not seeing my correctness. So. I see you don't deny the seizure of Rada. It's already good. Now for the rest of the points. Reducing press freedom is a blatant lie. A whole bunch of UKRAINIAN channels muddied Yanukovych's entire Maidan. I wonder how this fits in with the reduction of freedom of speech? Timoshenka's landing? She was imprisoned for the very corruption that existed long before Yanukovych and increased significantly after him. A puppet? In general, it's funny, he tried to play both sides, and up to a certain point very successfully, but refused from the association 1) Because it brought little benefit 2) the Russian Federation offered much better conditions. Oh, yes. A significant part of the people did not want this very association. Hence their actions in the east and south of the country. And now, tell me why their actions are terrorism for you, but the seizure of a government building and the overthrow of the president are not. I see rotten hypocrisy here... Or banal ignorance. So what is it?
1