Comments by "Surojeet Chatterjee" (@surojeetchatterjee) on "India’s 1965 counter-offensive saved Kashmir, but failed to defeat Pakistan" video.

As Indian from Pakistan perspective 65 was their best performance, bcs in other 3 wars they got more pounding & complete surrender. Here in 1965 it was 60-40 battle ratio.
10
@zt3gaming796 If Pakistan army was not ready jinnah wouldn't have send kabailese as first batch to attack Hari Singh kingdom. So u think driving out kabailese & Pakistan army who captured almost everything of all Kashmir district & just half day away from capturing Srinagar, to drive them away till Baramula & LOC was not a pounding win for India? 🤣 if Nehru wouldn't have gone to UN India would have taken Mirpur as well. Gilgit baltistan was opposite side of karakoram mountain range, it was for Hari Singh lack of quick decision making gilgit baltistan is in Pakistan control. Thanks to jinnah & Pakistan army & kabailese without them attacking Kashmir the Hari Singh kingdom we wouldn't have been able to sign him the instrument of accession to India. 😁😜
5
@aaryansharmaa4019 There was good smart bangladeshi pilots on Pakistan side.
2
@codifa5847 So u think with British era mejority ordnance in India,India had lack of ammo in 48? Which world do u live? It was clear victory for India until Nehru looking for Nobel peace prize went to UN.
1