Comments by "Nightingale" (@nightingale7090) on "The Sun" channel.

  1.  @djsaoirse1981  Zaporizhzhya is 40 km behind the front line, bot.
    7
  2.  @Sam-hu3cw  Russia always stored their munitions in the basements of civilian houses. Ukrainians proved that in liberated Balaklea, Izium, Lyman.
    5
  3.  @SlavaKalibru  белгород уже дрова заготовил? Благодаря жесту доброй воли в Изюме, расстояние от линии фронта до центра Белгорода - 50 км. Как раз под химарсы и экскалибуры.
    2
  4.  @C.CUMM1NGS  NATO started to supply heavy weaponry only when the Ukrainians forced Russia to retreat from Kiyv and stopped Russian advance in kherson, kharkiv and donbass regions. Until then Ukraine was almost on its own.
    2
  5.  @187Rajah  Bridge is a legitimate military target. Russia is using it to haul military equipment and supplies.
    2
  6. Yes, Ukraine has 1mil soldiers against 200 000 of Russians. Their victory is inevitable. Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦❤
    2
  7.  @mugheth6069  If Putin doesn't care about his people and use them to cover his military convoys, why should we care?
    1
  8.  @mugheth6069  WTC wasn't a legitimate target, the Crimea bridge was. Stop telling BS.
    1
  9.  @mugheth6069  And the WTC was attacked during the working hours, to kill as much civilians as possible. The bridge attack was performed at night to minimize civilian casualties. There is no court in the world that would call it a terrorist act.
    1
  10.  @victorzvyagintsev1325  the only terrorist here is Putin. He was covering his military convoys with the bodies of innocent civilians 😡
    1
  11. Yes, ruzzia is a terrorist state
    1
  12. Вам бы для начала надо из Харькова драпануть успеть😁😁 прежде чем со странами НАТО тягаться. Если несколько тысяч украинцев смогли прорвать ваш самый укреплённый фронт и обратить вас в бегство, то представь что с вами будет, когда 2х миллионная армия НАТО зайдёт через Финляндию или Литву.
    1
  13. Bridge is a legitimate military target. Putin used it to haul military equipment and supplies.
    1
  14. Bro, it is just your fantasies. You have no evidence, just words.
    1
  15. In the video there is a soviet-made BTR and a Russian 'tiger' captured as a trophy. Where do you see 80% of western hardware and mercenaries?
    1
  16. Stop the hysteria. This bridge was used to haul military equipment and supplies so it is a legitimate military target.
    1
  17.  @187Rajah  Russia bombed Kharkiv thermal power plant- that's a real terrorist act against civilians. Whereas the bridge is a legitimate military target. The only illegal government here is Russian. Because the coup in 1993 when Boris Eltsin shot parlament building with tanks. And started an illegal war in 1994 against chechens, annexed Crimea, started a hybrid war in Donbass and broke minsk argreements (10 paragraph) Russia is an illegal terrorist state.
    1
  18. There is no terrorism in destroying the bridge which was used to haul military equipment. And it is impossible to destroy a bridge like that with a truck filled with explosive.
    1
  19. Russians are not Slavs, they are Finno-Ugrians
    1
  20.  @ST-ly8uf  In 2014, Scotland almost separated from the UK (44% voted to leave Britain), but no one threatened them with a destructive war. Brits haven't even banned separatist parties. I'm sure the Americans would have done the same.
    1
  21.  @Sam-hu3cw  What are u trying to tell? 59 pieces of Russian combat aircraft were shot down, that's a fact.
    1
  22.  @Sam-hu3cw  It could be either air-defences or Ukrainian air forces. We are not allowed to know. So I would recommend you to concentrate your attention on the result.
    1