Comments by "Styracosaurus QVT" (@styracosaurusqvt4841) on "Rampant BA 5" video.

  1.  @conquistadornemesis4171  Attacking someone’s credential does not invalidate their argument. A person without a high school diploma can tell you it’s raining.
    4
  2. Great question.
    2
  3. Gain-of-function research-produced virus?
    1
  4. Mocking plausible therapies, calling a life-saving medicine horse tranquilizer, and suggesting that questioning the efficacy and safety of a particular vaccine makes someone against vaccination, demonstrate that you and your comment have zero credibility.
    1
  5. Groundless accusations. He is simply analyzing the information he considers most relevant.
    1
  6.  @peteanderson7416  He isn’t analyzing data, he’s issuing a prediction about what might happen. Such predictions aren’t subject to peer review the way studies of past medical data are. Peer-review is questionable anyway if all the peers are biased against something because it doesn’t conform to their preconceptions.
    1
  7.  @MrJimMajor  False equivalency.
    1
  8.  @ucouco78  False information.
    1
  9. You’ve got to be kidding.
    1
  10. No they don’t.
    1
  11. You have no idea whether it was the vaccine that reduced your symptoms, or whether you would have had mild symptoms regardless. He isn’t attempting discredit vaccines in general, or even the Covid vaccine specifically, he’s simply presenting evidence of its limited efficacy, especially in preventing infection with the newer variants.
    1
  12. Questioning his credentials doesn’t invalidate his recommendations.
    1
  13.  @foddyfoddy  Calling an argument a conspiracy theory doesn’t invalidate it.
    1