Comments by "Reecom98" (@reecom9884) on "Trump sues Facebook, Twitter and Google" video.

  1. This is another Trump lawsuit that will be ruled by the judge as “Without Merit” and will dismiss the case.
    7
  2. At Trump’s recent political rally, he said about paying taxes on fringe benefits, “Who knew?” When he was running for president, he bragged that he knew the tax laws better than a CPA. It appears that Trump knows almost nothing about free speech and tax laws.
    6
  3.  @adabellana77  In America, the United States Constitution states that government is not allowed to control free speech. I don’t know what the Mexican Constitution says. "First Amendment; Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances..."www.constitution.congress.gov When the US Constitution was written they had the paper press and not broadcast companies. If you agree with the Mexican President and not the US First Amendment, then you might want to think about moving to Mexico.
    1
  4.  @1987Miketyson  “In Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), the Supreme Court held that a person distributing religious literature on the sidewalk of a “company town” was protected by the First Amendment rights of freedom of the press and religion and could not be arrested for trespass...Additionally, Marsh became the conceptual foundation for PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980) and other cases in which individuals claimed First Amendment rights of speech and free exercise in shopping malls, airports, and other quasi-public spaces…” In Marsh v. Alabama a private company used the courts to interfere with individual rights by arresting them with criminal trespassing in quasi-public spaces. In the Facebook and Twitter lawsuit it is a civil lawsuit against a private company without quasi-public spaces, since you have to be admitted into the website by joining per their rules. Marsh v. Alabama does not apply.
    1