Comments by "Reecom98" (@reecom9884) on "The Sun"
channel.
-
1400
-
1000
-
965
-
956
-
762
-
695
-
545
-
432
-
415
-
384
-
367
-
353
-
319
-
310
-
308
-
294
-
266
-
241
-
233
-
223
-
218
-
203
-
199
-
198
-
185
-
174
-
173
-
On one had if it was an accident, it shows poor design, maintenance, training, and leadership. The Moskva was sailing in a storm and not in active firing mode, so there was a very slim chance for a fire to start in a weapon magazine. On the other hand, if the Ukrainian Neptune cruise missile, which was developed by Ukraine, struck the Moskva during a storm and the Moskva was unable to detect or defend it’s self, it shows badly on the Russian navy. If the Russian missile cruiser Moskva sinks by either an accidental fire in the ship’s magazine or by a hit by Ukraine’s Neptune cruise missile, which was developed by Ukraine, it’s a devastating blow to Russia. The Russian reported that the entire crew was evacuated from the warship. Why evacuate the entire crew? Why no damage control team left on board to keep the ship from sinking and maintaining a tow watch for the tugboats’ towlines? The only reason to totally abandon ship is because the warship is in immediate danger of capsizing and sinking.
173
-
173
-
166
-
162
-
160
-
155
-
153
-
152
-
148
-
144
-
143
-
138
-
133
-
132
-
129
-
126
-
122
-
121
-
115
-
115
-
112
-
110
-
109