Comments by "Reecom98" (@reecom9884) on "Rishi Sunak refuses to back Suella Braverman after speeding fine row" video.

The “Cover up” is often more damaging then the actual incident. A minor incident can be attributed to a single moment of misjudgment. Covering up the incident shows a willful effort to deceive.
136
@nimzgaz7049 She has been accused of asking civil servants to help her avoid a speeding fine and a driving awareness course alongside other motorists by arranging a private session instead to avoid public disclosure.
9
@user-fg5zx4gz1z Asking publicly paid civil servants to do personal favors is unethical and an abuse of government powers.
5
@user-fg5zx4gz1z She has been accused of asking civil servants to help her avoid a speeding fine and a driving awareness course alongside other motorists by arranging a private session instead to avoid public disclosure.
3
@user-fg5zx4gz1z Asking the civil servants who works for her, paid by taxpayers, to perform duties for her personal issue is unethical and an abuse of her position.
1
@user-fg5zx4gz1z Even asking the civil servants who works for her to look into the issue, which is outside of their paid duties for her personal issue is unethical, an abuse of her position and lack of ethics. If she made them do it, then it would have been a crime.
1
@user-fg5zx4gz1z Asking paid civil servants who works under her about a personal matter is unethical. She asked them for special favors to remove the penalty points and fine by attending a private speeding class without the public knowing. The security issue would involve security services, not people under her direct report.
1