Comments by "" (@papawheelie5576) on "Inside Trump’s historic second impeachment | Nightline" video.

  1.  @scottdellrobinson  Go cheer on antifa. They're still rioting in Portland. Maybe you can bail some of them out?
    5
  2.  @Baconized_Canadian  Pretty sure the Dems have full control of Congress now.
    3
  3.  @Baconized_Canadian  Wrong again. Only a handful of the 60+ voter fraud cases were actually heard. Most were dismissed on technicalities, e.g. "standing".
    3
  4.  @Baconized_Canadian  If anyone is interested in seeing the evidence of 2020 voter fraud, it's being collected on a crowd-sourced website. YouTube is censoring the name (of course), but it's "here is the evidence" followed by "dot com".
    3
  5.  @Baconized_Canadian  No need to continue spreading lies. Just google: wiseenergy election cases Nice database of the fraud cases and their current status.
    3
  6. There's a reason Trump beat out 16 other establishment clowns to get the nomination in 2016.
    2
  7.  @Baconized_Canadian  It's just a set of links to Standford-MIT's election database. Stanford and MIT are right-leaning propaganda? Educate yourself and stop spreading lies about the election.
    2
  8.  @Baconized_Canadian  Not sure what that has to do with you spreading misinformation about the election fraud cases.
    2
  9.  @Baconized_Canadian  My just sad? Sounds like you got called out for lying and have no defense. Again, there's no propaganda here, just a database of the fraud litigation.
    2
  10.  @Baconized_Canadian  Any facts you aren't comfortable with are "right wing". Take it up with Stanford and MIT.
    2
  11.  @Baconized_Canadian  You said that voter fraud was disproved in court. I provided unbiased links to the court cases showing they were never heard. You got mad.
    2
  12. He did, but was acquitted again. It's manipulative to refer to him as being "impeached", but that's the entire reason they did it.
    2
  13. He technically was impeached. There's some unfortunate confusion about what that means. It's similar to saying someone was indicted of a criminal charge. But, since he was acquitted (found not guilty), it's manipulative to continue labeling him "impeached". We don't refer to someone who was found not guilty in a court of law as forever "indicted".
    1
  14.  @BigfootInAStetson  But Trump never called for violence.
    1
  15. He also exposed Fake News to those who weren't already aware. The MSM is an ongoing disinformation campaign.
    1
  16. Exactly. If Biden had a legitimate win, this impeachment hoax would not be necessary.
    1