Comments by "Donald MacKerer" (@donaldmackerer9032) on "Destiny" channel.

  1. What? What are you talking about, your statement makes no sense without context.
    2
  2.  @rozzgrey801  It seems so. I think it's a dangerous trend in this country to dismiss science and be antagonistic to it. Science is more of a methodology than a dogma. Science and religion are too different subjects that don't necessarily need to be antagonistic towards one another.
    2
  3. @Filip Belciug  Yeah one thing I'd say the Drake equation Did not take into account was that the planet might need a moon large enough to keep its axis from making wild swings In direction. That would limit even further a Planets ability To have a stable enough climate for intelligent life to evolve. It would probably Make Earth like planets even fewer in number Or planets hospital to life in more complex forms.
    2
  4. But it is also dangerous As well as beautiful.
    1
  5. @Juggled  True enough in a lot of cases. However planets could have electromagnetic fields and atmospheres to protect against that. Plus solar winds from their own star.
    1