General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Donald MacKerer
CNN
comments
Comments by "Donald MacKerer" (@donaldmackerer9032) on "See how Russian media depicts former Fox host Tucker Carlson" video.
Steven is already Over there. He is an honored guest at parties in russia. They have helped him to finance a martial arts institution. Steven segal has already gotten russian citizenship.
7
Another moral of the story is dope lost a billionaire like Rupert Murdoch of bunch of money. They tend not to like that.
6
It was close.
2
Yeah I believe it was as long ago as early spring last year.
2
After they give him hero of the state Medal.
2
Β @goodlookingman4489Β Well that's good.. However he was required viewing for people who were working in the russian propaganda department.
2
Yeah he could hook up with marjorie taylor green. Who knows she might even give him some. He could also take aikido from Steven Seagal and judo from Putin.
1
You got that right! On both counts.
1
You're clueless. I have known some people who have gone to China And we are no Where close to them.
1
What? What are you Talking about?
1
That's choice coming from the far right wing.
1
π€£π He was the epitome of fake news !
1
No he just gave his honest opinion but it wasn't anywhere near the truth. He was clueless on history. He obviously knew nothing about putin.
1
Yeah I think it was that matthew dude.
1
Now there's some projection. That was exactly what tucker was doing. I don't get to c n n hate. Of course I haven't been watching it very long. Just started in february of twenty twenty two and not all that often. It was just one source I looked at among many other.
1
No doubt. The height of hypocrisy. Russians had controllers on their news broadcast to make sure that nobody criticized putin or the government. Now some got away with it in a way by they were not speakin as an expert but just giving an opinion. Otherwise they were warned that they would go to jail.
1
π€£ Wouldn't that be ironic. Wouldn't it be bizarre Karma if it turned out to be true. π€£π€£ππ
1
As an unintentional dupe.
1
Yes call fox.
1
Well if that's so, He sure was naive and misinformed.
1
Carlson was not Technically a journalist. He gave editorials. He would have been considered a entertainer. He was aspiusing opinions not giving news. Get a grip.
1
Take that up with rupert murdoch he's the one that fired him.
1
That's pretty close to the truth.
1
π€£π€£π No He just gave his own biased opinions. He was honest about it though. If he was a truth seeker, he would taken the time to do some research. What do you mean by your side anyway. That's one thing I hate is the polarization. How about the people who are in the middle who don't agree with either party on all issues All the time. To quote abraham lincoln who quoted the bible a nation divided cannot long stand. The United States will probably end up being better off in the future without him. Now we need the voice of dissent at times in this country because issues are not always clear or black and white. Sometimes the dissenting or minority opinion might be right, Or it could be wrong but by being wrong. It makes the correct opinion all the more clear. Sometimes it may be a mixture of both right and wrong but that gives an opportunity for people to find out what. Is the truth. However it doesn't need to be vicious or caustic. Nor does it need to be dissent for dissent sake or for personal gains For example for money or fame via viewership. Imho, Tucker carlson played on your emotions. You were had. He is a demagogue who just told his audience by ranting what they wanted to hear.
1
Not even close. At times he did not even know What he was talking about. Plus his knowledge of twentieth century history was horrifying.
1
He was very wrong in a lot of what he said. He wasn't wrong and voicing his opinion though. It says opinion he had that right.
1
Oh yeah lavroff is really shrewd sneaky good as a Russian propagandist. He is not to be Underestimated.
1
The latter.
1
You are on to something there. I could see that happening.
1
Not really he just gave his own biased opinions. Half the time he said something it was completely wrong or out of touch with reality and he didn't even realize it.
1
If i'm not mistaken I believe it came out that they knew the Charges against guardian was bogus but he ran with it anyway for the ratings. Basically he was lying so he could increase his viewership. It ended up costing Fox a load of money And that's why rupert murdoch had him fired. Murdoch isn't exactly what you would call a liberal.
1
@Dorian Shades of grayΒ Hey genius. It's a very small part of our Defense budget. Plus we're not giving away the equipment for free. And what about American values such as freedom of speech, the right to assemble, the right of self determination, and a country's right to their own future. Their right to their own trade and foreign treaties as long as they aren't trying to force it on others by force of arms. But I guess people like you don't understand principles.
1