Comments by "Joe Blow" (@JoeBlow_4) on "Law&Crime Network" channel.

  1. As a former toddler I can totally relate to these people.
    2700
  2. Why on earth is Stormy Daniels on this channel offering an opinion? Scraping the barrel are you?
    32
  3. He seems like a good dude. Well done, brah.
    16
  4. That's certainly on the list, but the first step is securing the border.
    9
  5. I've got an odd feeling that he didn't do it even though I believe I should think he did. I normally always think the person is guilty in these scenarios. This one has me perplexed. i'll be paying attention to the evidence and will formulate my opinion as we go ;).
    9
  6. He's a terrible lawyer.
    8
  7. How much was she ordered to pay Trump? I forget.
    7
  8. Satisfying a contempt charge by buying lunch is pretty funny.
    4
  9. He passed by the area where the phone was located at 42 MPH. He didn't stop there. He could not have thrown the phone that distance from his vehicle. That is a lot farther than he could have thrown that phone while driving 42 miles per hour.
    3
  10. God will judge Mr. Jackson. Whatever happens here is entirely secondary to what is to come.
    2
  11. The attorney was sweating more than her.
    2
  12. Whether she stole or not, I want to see his probable cause for confronting her about stealing..
    2
  13. A couple of these were actually bad arrests.
    2
  14. When will people realize they shouldn't speak with law enforcement without an attorney present.
    2
  15. I literally laughed out loud by myself.
    2
  16. Officer had the patience of a saint.
    1
  17. This is between her and God. I can't even imagine what would cause someone to do this.
    1
  18. Are you kidding? We watched Alex Murdoch's and his son's face when the verdict was read in a murder trial. Who cares if we see her face when the verdict is read in a civil trial? There's no privacy law in play here.
    1
  19. For some reason I feel bad for her. I don't excuse her, but I felt empathy for some reason.
    1
  20.  @rockrhymrr  I bet. When I posted it 9 months ago it was fresh. But thanks for the comment.
    1
  21. Mom is now blaming psych meds the girl was taking for the incident.
    1
  22. More importantly than that, in this instance the prosecutor tried to go down a path that the court had previously said it wasn't going to allow, namely the fact that the Defendant had commented in that past that he wished he could use deadly force to protect property. That is irrelevant in this instance as there has been no evidence introduced that occurred in this instance. It was purely prejudicial and the prosecutor tried to get it past the defense..
    1
  23. He was clearly in the middle of a paranoid psychotic break and was complying until the officer shot him with less than lethal, first. This will be ruled a righteous shoot but it was clearly an unnecessary shoot.
    1
  24. I'm not judging but the sentence struck me as exceedingly lenient.
    1
  25. There was no need for that to escalate to deadly force. He was unarmed. Why was she confronting him alone? Where was her taser? This was a class in bad decisions.
    1
  26. For CNN's counsel to allege that they can serve an SDT for records and NOT notify the other side because they thought it was merely a "witness subpoena", is not only not believable, it's bad lawyering. You'd think CNN could afford lawyers who know the law regarding subpoena duces tecum for records.
    1
  27. The indoctrination of another generation of victims is complete.
    1
  28.  @PrinceFluffy  That's like saying the best athlete in the Special Olympics.
    1