Comments by "Dmitri Zorkin" (@dmitrizorkin3851) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

  1.  @stef1896  This is again a repetition of stupid Western myths about hordes of Bolsheviks who overwhelmed positions. In fact, the total number of combat-ready bayonets in the Soviet army was no more than in the Axis troops. And even more so at the end of 42. The numerical superiority began to take shape only by the end of 43 years. I'm not even talking about the fact that a huge part of the recruits in 42 were residents of the Central Asian republics, who were much worse than the Romanians in terms of morale and combat training. For some reason, everyone writes how the Germans suffered from one thing to another, but they do not take into account that the Soviet army suffered from a lack of people, fuel and ammunition no less. Most divisions had 50% -60% of the pre-war composition. The situation more or less changed only in 44.
    3
  2. Sound like BS fairytale from Reddit.
    3
  3.  @fabiana7157  and now count wermacht and Axis deaths, and you see that, they are not less
    2
  4.  @RavemastaJ  lol you moron. Then the infantry squad attacks , they dont need antitank weapon! They had another goals. If they are in defence, they had AT weapons on platoon level. And Wermacht soldiers on low level didnt had AT weapons either! Until 1944 at least.
    2
  5.  @kingslushie1018  then why german " so superior" tactics didnt save them from disaster in 1942 in Staligrad Battle? In Africa? Logistics! Thats why.
    2
  6.  @charlesford7887  eltsin was funded by CIA? Lol. GO wear your tinfoil hat " genious".
    1
  7. How about Tokyo or Hiroshima in 1945?
    1
  8.  @Allure1337  no it was not as far as succesful. It was succesful only first 2-3 days. And only on Mantoiffel direction. The overhyped SS Dietrich divisions doing zero. Please go read some history books, before statement.
    1
  9. PANTHER WAS SHITTY tank, for closet Fuhrer fanboys. For Germany it was better to make more Pz4, than wasting resources on this.
    1
  10.  @looinrims  why it was a surprise? Hitler generals Become dumb overnight? German intelligence? What was doing?
    1
  11.  @hazzmati  billions , trillions...idiot.
    1
  12.  @princeofcupspoc9073  Its better to have 8 mediocre tanks , than only 2, but the best. Sorry, but its the logic of war.
    1
  13.  @omaralonso2471 1) actually germany is bigger than texas. 2)For some reason, when talking about the Second World War, an interesting manipulation takes place, no one takes into account that half of the then fought for Germany, including countries such as Bulgaria, Hungary, Europe, France. Yes, their troops could not equal the Wehrmacht, but they supplied weapons and ammunition in the same way. For example, the same Czech Republic produced tanks, while the French produced engines and spare parts for aircraft. Therefore, to say that the poor Wehrmacht fought alone against the whole world is manipulation.
    1
  14.  @DeltaEchoGolf  actually soviets didnt use Apc much at all. They even dont had place in their doctrine. So you telling, thet soviets won becouse of land lease Bren carriers is just....wow! There was no any carriers in soviet winter offensive of 1941, and only a few British tanks, Threre was no significant number of lendlease vehicles until 1944 actually. Therefore, the main part of the most important battles was carried out by a Russian soldier in Russian equipment.
    1
  15.  @yousefseed1874  why they are " worce"? Becouse they Debunking the myths created by the Wehrmacht and some unscrupulous Western authors about the Soviet front during the Cold War? Lol. You have Typical closet Naz1 -weaboo opinion.
    1
  16. 56 Shtalin fanboys put a Dislikes!
    1