Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 😂
    1
  2. Right so it's protecting their land to invade another sovereign nation without provocation. That is like saying I am defending myself by jumping the small kid. Stop supporting bullies.
    1
  3. R u a Russian bot? 🤦‍♂️
    1
  4. Far from it. If u condone the death of a nation based on nothing more than one division, then that is on u.
    1
  5. What kind of logic is that?
    1
  6. Exactly
    1
  7. Air space is a factor. Easier to defend than attack
    1
  8. Go overthrow Putin
    1
  9. Ok Russian bot
    1
  10. I doubt that, especially since most ended up leaving due to the constant civil war occurring against the Separatists.
    1
  11.  @biglad112  moved to live here. Despite Russia being the largest country on Earth. That doesn’t mean shit. Also u are aware that Germany made the exact same arguments about Poland in 1939. Does that justify the German invasion?
    1
  12. And idiots will buy into Putin.
    1
  13. No
    1
  14.  @SILVERONIN  perhaps, perhaps not. Only time tells
    1
  15. Um no. Putin did not invade over that, as that would be a pretty dumb reason to invade. He did it over Ukraine turning to NATO and Ukraine has every right to defend itself.
    1
  16. The only idiot here is u
    1
  17. Russia is trying to destroy Ukraine anyways. U might as well go down fighting.
    1
  18. Really, do u think Russia would respond kindly if the USA put 150,000 troops at the Estonian Russian border? Or do u think Russia would say something about that?
    1
  19. I don’t recall us being at war with China. As for Putin, I wonder who’s troops crossed the border into another country? Don’t delude ur self into condoning Putin just because of the west’s own wrong doings
    1
  20. How so?
    1
  21. We provoked nothing. Ukraine was wanting to join NATO and Russia invaded as a result
    1
  22. Hqhahaha nope
    1
  23. How wrong u r
    1
  24. Ukrainians are preventing most from fleeing since they are trying to defend the country.
    1
  25. How exactly is this the US or NATO’s fault?
    1
  26. Nope
    1
  27. WTF?
    1
  28. WTF? LOL
    1
  29. Really, like what?
    1
  30.  @tonyatkinson3890  what Nazi elements? And what genocide?
    1
  31.  @tonyatkinson3890  send me a source
    1
  32.  @tonyatkinson3890  so you are going by Putin’s word?
    1
  33. Proof of Ukraine being Nazis? The president is literally Jewish bud. Get over yourself. Also don't you think Fascism took a rise in Ukraine maybe because they were constantly being harrassed by Russia? Ever heard the saying, "Extreme situations require extreme meausres?" The more Russia makes an enemy of Ukraine, the more extreme lengths it will take to defend itself and fight Russia.
    1
  34.  @romannazarov1975  do you have a source for your accusations?
    1
  35.  @romannazarov1975  ok and how does this tie to your point?
    1
  36.  @romannazarov1975  "My point of view is that the world is changing. It is impossible to build a policy and claim that Russia is to blame for everything." - Most sensible people aren't blaming Russia for everything. Yes it is fair to say that NATO did not negotiate the matter as well as it should of, but considering that Putin was essentially just looking for an excuse to invade, it is clear no matter what we did or said, that Putin would of done it eventually regardless. "At the moment, for the sake of the United States, thousands of lives are being brought in Ukraine, and European economies are also collapsing." - Something that needs to be fixed. "The West deceived Ukraine, allowing it to think that it is capable of winning the war, and also raised an analogue of the Third Reich on its territory ..." - I don't know what you mean about the Third Reich shit, but yes I will agree that NATO did give Ukraine a false sense of security, and in that vain I agree NATO is in the wrong. However considering this is Russia we are talking about, we would not be able to keep said promises to Ukraine without risking WW3 in the process. "NATO must return to the 1997 borders." - Um, why? "For peace to come." - All that would do is weaken Eastern Europe to be at Russia's mercy yet again. "The United States can no longer dictate its will to countries without taking into account other people's interests, in other words, the United States needs to re-learn to talk, not to order." - Ironic considering Putin basically ORDERED Ukraine not to try to join NATO. "Europe is quite capable of being united and independent, and if it integrates with Russia, then the most ambitious peaceful project on the planet will turn out, with a single economic space!!!" - You are seriously deluding yourself there bud. No, even disregarding the economic state Russia is in, the Geopolitics in Europe would not allow it. Most European nations, especially ones in Eastern Europe, don't trust Russia. Not only because of their oppression crimes carried out under the USSR flag, but also because of the fact Russia kept backing anti government separatists. "I think that the United States is most afraid of this scenario, they know that Russia always takes into account the interests of others and fulfills its promises!" - Right, so Putin is totally taking the interests of others into account when he is arresting protestors or funding insurrections, or invading multiple sovereign nations. Bud you are literally buying into Russian Propaganda.
    1
  37. ​ @romannazarov1975  "The first is because Russia is asking for it," - So? "because NATO was created as a defensive alliance against communism. And where is the communist USSR now." - Putin. That is where. A serpent can shed its skin, but it is still a serpent and if you look at what Putin is doing to Russia now, it is going to lead to the same thing again. Also China is still a thing. "And certainly the advancement of NATO to the borders of Russia will not add security in Europe. " - It will to the nations in the alliance. Again you are trying to frame it like NATO forced or pressured these nations to join it when Eastern Europe nations went to NATO to join, not the only way around. "NATO, having attacked Yugoslavia in 1999, discredited itself as a defensive alliance ..." - Just as Putin has discredited himself for only acting in the security of Russia when arresting his own people, invading Georgia, Crimea, and backing anti Ukrainian government separatists. "It is foolish to tease a nuclear superpower that has supersonic missiles that cannot be shot down." - You mean missiles the USA also has? "While the rest are only learning how to build supersonic missiles, Russia is already learning how to merge them." - Again missles USA and China also have. "And no one knows what else is in service with Russia. " - We don't have to. If Russia uses nukes, its game over for everyone involved. "Any negotiations are a search for compromises, do not think that by giving in to the request, Europe can receive security guarantees. In the meantime, everything is moving towards a third world war with a power that has an advantage in armament ..." - Which is trying to be avoided, but if it is inevitable, why would we already give Russia an advantage?
    1
  38. Such as? Also clear to note, the US's own injustices does not justify what Russia is doing now.
    1
  39. Someone did not do their homework
    1
  40. I don’t recall our troops crossing an enemy line here. Russia is the one invading, not the only way around. Don’t delude ur self
    1