Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "FOX 26 Houston" channel.

  1. Even though nearly half of the pro life movement is women? 😂
    3
  2.  @NackDSP  termination of an innocent human being is everyone’s business
    2
  3.  @animationdramanation5730  and some don’t refuse. And just because some do, doesn’t mean they should
    2
  4. Hahahah how much you have wrong. For one Abortion was never a right
    2
  5. So be selfish and dodge responsibility even when it murders ur own kid. Glad to know your not a politician
    2
  6.  @jl1695  then you need help
    1
  7.  @aldairp1745  and unless their life is medically in danger, you never need it. Especially not at the expense of another child’s life.
    1
  8. Kay, I’m sorry for how you are feeling on the matter. But understand that the reason it hurts so much is because you went against the motherly instincts all women have. Think of it like a set of primal programming. Understand that many women that turn to abortion end up leading to depression afterwards. And now you understand how precious life can be, how it made you feel in the taking of one. I don’t wish to guilt trip you, that is not my intent. Rather I hope you understand that the pro life movement wants to prevent that tragedy from occurring.
    1
  9.  @aldairp1745  which is by definition living. Also we are also a group of cells. All organisms are. So kind of a mute point. And biologically it’s a separate human being. Get your facts straight before commenting
    1
  10. ​ @aldairp1745  "youre talking about facts but then make the subjective argument that a pile of stem cells qualifies as a human being." - Nowhere did I say cells alone qualified a human being. I am saying trying to use the "clump of cells" argument is dishonest considering that is what we all technically are. Because a Embryo and Fetus is from a genetic standpoint a human being. The only key differences between a human before birth and a human after birth comes down to these 4 things, size, degree of consciousness/ sentience , location, and degree of dependence. So my question I am going to ask you, is what ground are you trying to argue against the validity of that human being?
    1
  11.  @aldairp1745  "plants have stem cells. Horses and pigs fetuses have stem cells. You wanna label those piles of stem cells human beings too?" - Do you ever stop trying to be disingenuous within your arguments? I think you can clearly distinguish a plant and horse from a human. They all have separate genetic codes.
    1
  12.  @aldairp1745  "no its biologically a pile of stem cells. Anything from a newborn and older have zero stem cells." - And what difference does that make? So let me get your logic straight, You can have two babies. Both are 9 months, and the ground you are going to stand on for whether or not the living being is valid is the presence of stem cells? LOL. "And yes all organisms are made of cells. Good job you can read what i literally had just said. Like i said. If you value all cells the same way then i expect you to starve to death after you don't eat anything literally any type of food is made from cells." - Once again relying on a fallacy, I never said it held validity because it had cells. I stated it has validity because it is biologically speaking a separate human being. Or did you not take a biology class on how fertilization and conception works?
    1
  13.  @aldairp1745  "being a seperate human being is an abstract concept." - Except it isn't, obviously there is a scientific bases for one human being, being separated from another human being. Otherwise, why are you not part of your mom rn? "conjoined twins can share a body and are two human beings. Being separate or together do not dictate human status." - From a purely genetic standpoint, yes it does. Of course it is kinda funny how you take an anomaly that almost never happens as the ground for abortion? Like you do understand when I state separate, I mean a completely separate genetic code, not physically separate like location wise. Like did you take a biology class?
    1
  14.  @aldairp1745  A human zygote is yes. It is the beginning of a new human being. Something science has already backed up. That is the whole point of conception.
    1
  15.  Xi Ping  none of it is made up bud. Pieces of the arc were discovered, Jesus has been proven real through history even down to years being based on his birth. A man is blind through absence of sight, a man in denial is one who fails to use it.
    1
  16.  Xi Ping  really. What evidence is there to imply the existence of any of them within actual objective artifacts and history? Jesus was literally recorded within historical achieves proving he did at the very least exist. Whether or not he was the son of God is where the belief comes in. Even many atheists recognize that fact.
    1
  17. Right so the better alternative is to murder them? Give me a break.
    1
  18. How? 😂
    1
  19. Most will refrain and the few that don’t I’m not gonna hold sympathy for if they are willing to endanger their own life just to murder another
    1
  20.  @info145  murder is a premeditated killing of another human being. So yes it is. Now as for the rape argument, I’m gonna ask here and now. Do u believe abortion outside of rape is ok?
    1
  21.  @info145  also you really don’t want to go down the deformity argument otherwise we are going to end up in the eugenics territory.
    1
  22.  @info145  you don’t get to make that choice for someone else. Maybe someone would rather live even with its trials than be murdered before even being given a chance. I would not curse them through murder. And again, it is not our place to try to decide for another human being whether or not their life is worth living. Again you are literally falling into the eugenics territory
    1
  23.  @info145  again it’s not their body. The child is a separate human being, it’s not the mother’s body.
    1
  24.  @info145  the fact you even downright say you are ok with all shows it’s not relevant to u if it’s rape or not. Which means you are trying to use a statistical anomaly to attempt to justify the majority of cases. Which is not only unrealistic and unreasonable but extremely intellectually dishonest and borderline manipulative
    1
  25.  @info145  but in case Latin isn’t enough for u. Fetus definition Oxford language definition: an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.
    1
  26.  @info145  except we aren’t birds. Trying to compare bird biology to human biology doesn’t work. And yes a fertilized egg does have a little bird in there. So yes it is a bird.
    1
  27.  @info145  and they do have the choice to pro create. But if they choose to pro create through sex, they choose the consequences that come with it. I would find it far more comparable to slavery to attempt to dehumanize a human being over the convenience of someone
    1
  28. 10th amendment indicates otherwise. And considering the stance of pro life is morally in the right, I doubt there should be objection here
    1
  29.  @bootyeater7331  no it was interpreted originally under that. However the 14th amendment does explicitly place any right to abortion and it does not imply it either since again protection of body autonomy does not extend to a right to directly harm another innocent human being as a consequence of your choice.
    1
  30.  @bootyeater7331  also yes many laws would be struck down by the 10th amendment, why do you think Federal power went too far in many areas to tyrannical proportions. Abortion will never be a constitutional right unless it gets amended in the constitution, something that will never happen
    1
  31. Rape cases are less than 2% of all abortion cases. You are using a statistical anomaly to attempt to justify the rest which is intellectually dishonest.
    1
  32. Killing an innocent child isn’t a right. And if they are willing to risk killing themselves just to murder their child, then that is self inflicted and my sympathies can only go so far.
    1
  33. Hahahahah. Nope. I bet most of them miss their $2 gas, high availability of jobs, good trade, and lack of hyper inflation. Also almost half of the pro life movement is composed of women, so your point is mute
    1
  34.  @xorrior4438  Abortion very much is in our own realms and something we can control
    1
  35.  @xorrior4438  first of all you are relying on a false equivalence. One the advocation of guns even disregarding that it’s explicitly a right within the 2nd amendment is pushed for out of defending the innocent as other types of crimes usually statistically go up with citizens having the capacity to defend themselves. Taking that issue away though, I don’t think it’s honest to relegate the argumentation to them deciding “whether or not they can take care of it.” Firstly it ignores that adoption is more than a viable alternative to motherhood. Secondly, you don’t get to kill another human being simply because you don’t feel “ready” for the responsibility.
    1
  36. Your stance shows exactly why it should be an issue. Like really it shouldn’t be an issue only when it goes your way? Hypocrite.
    1
  37. And murder ain’t a right. Period
    1
  38. Nope. Protection of an innocent human being absolutely involves laws as guarantees of the constitution is life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in that specific order.
    1
  39. We’ve been in the 21st century. It’s good that a baby’s life is finally about to be valued as such. And not in the age of barbarism where murder was simply for convenience
    1
  40. It certainly works better. If all you have to say is women will be irrational at a suicidal level then that says more about them than the policy
    1
  41.  @Tennethums1  not even close. Do you ignore that nearly 50% of the pro life movement is composed of women?
    1
  42.  @Tennethums1  Also nice attempt at gaslighting. It’s only helping the pro life stance. When you can’t defeat us with logic and reasoning, you will resort to emotional outbursts and gaslighting.
    1
  43.  @Tennethums1  I never claimed to know what’s best for women. I do know it’s better for the child not to be murdered however
    1
  44.  @Tennethums1  also clearly you did care otherwise you wouldn’t be trying to frame it as an anti women movement. You can’t when again nearly half of it is composed of women themselves
    1
  45.  @krasmasov6852  how so? I’m never beyond giving people the benefit of the doubt so feel free to present ur logic
    1
  46. Nice attempt at a strawman
    1
  47. It’s not about your bodies. It’s about the child’s. Do yourself a favor and have the capacity to be honest. Sorry you’re not that special. Also to note, the potential for a different injustice doesn’t justify the current injustice.
    1
  48. Really because I’ve been a rather strong advocate of programs helping orphans and many non profit organizations composed of mainly pro life members helped deal with costs. It’s just unlike you, we don’t believe it’s the government that always has to throw the check.
    1
  49. Also your logic is to punish the states that wish to uphold the right of its children. Seriously listen to yourself
    1
  50.  @MrFetchthestick  and nowhere did I claim to make a comparison. I’m glad you help people out. That’s not meant to be a competition as the gesture of helping others is not meant to be quantifiable.
    1