Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "The REAL Reason Hitler Declared War on the USA" video.

There are good guys and bad guys in the real world. It’s just in the context of war it is bad guys fighting worse guys
4
Not necessarily. Yes things were going bad. But like every war there are low points. They thought they could turn things around especially since major offensives were being planned at the time of surrender. That’s what led to the mindset
1
@amcalabrese1 dude I’m not arguing against the notion Germany would of lost regardless. I’m saying that the timing is what caused the mindset.
1
USA only trading with the enemies of Germany and attempting to protect British assets are violations. Or do u find US destroyers protecting British convoys acceptable.
1
@aguynamedscott11 once again, US was pretty much only trading with Germany’s enemies and not Germany itself. They ordered a shoot on sight defending British merchant ships and were even defending some of its colonial areas for them. If that’s not a violation of neutrality idk what is. The US was pretty much going to war in everything but name. It’s nonsense for the US to complain about German blockades through U boats when Britain is literally blockading Germany with a massive fleet. US even blackmailed Spain and said they would stop trading with Spain if they joined Germany. Once again, neutrality is free of bias and this wasn’t even close
1
@aguynamedscott11 neutrality definition: the state of not supporting or helping either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.; impartiality. The US was clearly helping Britain and actively hurting Germany. By this point, they weren’t neutral at all. Germany’s violations only came after US violations of showing clear bias within the war.
1
@aguynamedscott11 You are missing the point. They were defending British ships and military locations. Also yes, they have a right to trade with whoever. That would not be an issue if it was not for the the fact that the US was previously willing to trade with Germany up until the war. After which they displayed a clear bias. Not to mention, this was not trade but lend lease. Which is sending tools of war to Britain without any initial cost to aid Britain against Germany. Roosevelt even admits this. By this point, Germany was not in the wrong for sinking lend lease commerce ships. Also it is funny how quickly the US does a double standard because they accused the Soviet Union of being allied with Germany just because of their trade deals. It is one thing when the US simply does not do anything to help Germany. It is another when it is attacking German U boats trying to cut off Britain, blackmailing other countries to not side with Germany, defending British military locations, and providing free military equipment.
1
@aguynamedscott11 as I mentioned before it was not just trade bias. Did u not read my other points? Defending British bases, sending full lend lease supply to help Britain with war, enabling German blockaded, (I mean for goodness sakes, Britain’s blockade would be a violation of neutrality), blackmailing other countries. Idc of international laws have loop holes. It is pretty clear to anyone with half a brain that by the time the declaration happened, the other thing keeping the US from crossing the line into full war was the absence of their troops.
1
@aguynamedscott11 it’s basically equivalent to the US getting in Germany’s face shoving them multiple times and then asking to get punched.
1
@aguynamedscott11 So by that same logic, the US could not accuse the Soviet Union nor Spain of the same deal, yet they did.
1
Please tell me your joking
1