Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "Big Think" channel.

  1.  @EnlightenedByKnowledge  it really doesn’t. Because I already mentioned, I asked in a simple question. Does the lack of alternatives of an individual to provide for someone else constitute a right to kill that person? Yes or no? Because that is what you are basing your argument on. That because a Fetus relies on a mother to survive that constitutes the mother to kill said Fetus? Am I correct?
    1
  2.  @MichaelAronson  um it kinda does. Considering that part of the law when handled properly is to create restrictions to prevent morally reprehensible acts from being carried out
    1
  3.  @MichaelAronson  I think it’s pretty clear there is a big difference of mocking someone vs say stealing from them or murdering them. If you can’t see that, there really is no helping u.
    1
  4.  @MichaelAronson  and there have been plenty of laws created in their absence would still allow society to continue. So nice try at that fallacy
    1
  5.  @MichaelAronson  bud u ain’t making any sense
    1
  6.  @MichaelAronson  slavery is not legal and that didn’t make society unattainable. You are seriously ignorant of you think no law was ever made on moral grounds.
    1
  7.  @MichaelAronson  that’s not the purpose. You just contradicted ur self. I already explained, many laws came into being on morals grounds and not necessarily because of practical necessity like u claim to think.
    1
  8.  @EnlightenedByKnowledge  if abortion was illegal it wouldn’t require the mother’s “constant consent.” And once again you seem to dodge the question rather than answer it. Do you believe that the lack of substitutes of an individual to provide someone else the means to live constitutes that person to kill them. Yes or no. If you don’t intend on answering this question then don’t even bother responding.
    1
  9. Michael 마익흘 Aronson yep we know
    1
  10. Kerry Humphrey I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.
    1
  11. nownigel what are u talking about?
    1
  12. Michael 마익흘 Aronson according to u which means nothing.
    1
  13. Michael 마익흘 Aronson really how so? I comprehend ur statement.
    1
  14. Michael 마익흘 Aronson again, what am I not comprehending?
    1
  15. Michael 마익흘 Aronson doesn’t answer my question you fool. Or are you simply ran out of arguments to use?
    1
  16. Michael 마익흘 Aronson have you ran out of arguments?
    1
  17. Michael 마익흘 Aronson and again are you physically incapable of making a single comment without using the word fuck?
    1
  18. Michael 마익흘 Aronson where am I bleeding out? I look fine.
    1
  19. Michael 마익흘 Aronson my what?
    1
  20. Michael 마익흘 Aronson makes no sense. For now there isn’t much I can do. but the law can and with each year pro life members growing it more than likely will change. I’ll honestly look forward to that just to come back here and make u feel powerless like ur trying to do to me. So enjoy it while u can rn bud. 😂👍
    1
  21. Michael 마익흘 Aronson worthlessness? What are u talking about? I said much not any. And I never said my worth would change. I’m worth enough as it is. U can meet me if u would like to say otherwise. Also this goes to show how much u love human beings.
    1
  22.  @MichaelAronson  So because I can't stop a thousand people that makes me worthless? That is a pretty poor standard.
    1
  23. Michael 마익흘 Aronson no I really won’t. My family and friends would argue with that and I already changed the minds of 3 people within these discussions. I’m curious if u have been able to convince anybody with ur methods. And now ur advocating suicide. Ur really showing me just how much u care about people, how much u care about humanity as a whole. What’s funny is I doubt I’m the only one u advocate suicide towards. I’m curious, did a pro life member do so something personal to u or r u just butt hurt that pro life is actually gaining a larger following each year? Either way unless u can give a real argument with actual logic being put into it, ur only helping my side by showing how idiotic and damn near nihilistic pro choice has become. If u disagree then u can explain why people who want humans extinct also are pro choice.
    1
  24. Michael 마익흘 Aronson not really. Simply look up my channel, my YouTube page, many other video comment sections, Facebook, discord, Kik, and amino. Not to mention Xbox. Also no. Again u can explain why u hate pro life members so much? What the hell did I or any of my allies ever do to u? Seriously, unless ur a dumb troll, u would have to have a legitimate reason to hate us so much. Also I’m sorry but no, we aren’t committing suicide to gratify u. For someone who claims to defend women, u advocate for 51% of them to kill themselves. Plain evil and despicable.
    1
  25. Michael 마익흘 Aronson u mean 49% of women within the country? Because statistics from last year has now concluded that 51% of women are pro life. Ur now against more women than for women. Also define us harassing women. Because I never recall doing so.
    1
  26. Michael 마익흘 Aronson https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx
    1
  27. Michael 마익흘 Aronson also doesn’t change how many pro choice members still try to deny that a fetus is a separate human being.
    1
  28. Michael 마익흘 Aronson also I don’t think I can caress ur nuts from the internet. Learn English.
    1
  29. Michael 마익흘 Aronson that’s part of why abortion is a problem.
    1
  30. Michael 마익흘 Aronson again there hasn’t been a guilty baby because they haven’t committed a crime. So what’s ur point?
    1
  31. Michael 마익흘 Aronson nah. I’d prefer not to. I’ll do it for a million dollars if ur desperate enough but otherwise no thanks. U claimed earlier to be against Trump so don’t lie about that.
    1
  32. Ned Flanders no we just don’t want the death of children. Idc if it is a difficult decision. The murder of a child should never be a decision to make in the first place.
    1
  33. Michael 마익흘 Aronson it’s legal to kill unborn babies though which I’m also against.
    1
  34. Michael 마익흘 Aronson I won’t but that alone won’t stop the millions of abortions performed. Making illegal is the first step to make that happen.
    1
  35. Michael 마익흘 Aronson also I’m curious if u are capable of using one comment without dumb fuck or fucking imbecile.
    1
  36. Michael 마익흘 Aronson abortion is not suicide. Learn English u dumb fuck. Ah the irony.
    1
  37. Michael 마익흘 Aronson u really lack any ground on morality. Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if u were ok with a woman starving a baby after birth because by ur logic, “they don’t owe them shit.” Well guess what, if ur truly pro choice then tell the government to stop using our taxpayer dollars for their abortion clinics. Also I will bet that Roe v. Wade will be overturned and when it is. You won’t be laughing much anymore.
    1
  38. Michael 마익흘 Aronson idk when it will. I’m not a prophet.
    1
  39. Michael 마익흘 Aronson again it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that from a near universal standpoint murder is wrong. That shouldn’t be hard to explain. That’s something ur parents should of taught u pretty early in ur life.
    1
  40. Michael 마익흘 Aronson again a crime to what. Being a Jew was a crime for Nazi Germany. Did that make the Nazis murdering Jews ok?
    1
  41. Michael 마익흘 Aronson yes I am in fact.
    1
  42. Michael 마익흘 Aronson I’m saying that because again by ur own logic, u would be ok with another holocaust if it was legal. Am I wrong?
    1
  43. Michael 마익흘 Aronson also by ok I’m saying moral? Was it moral for the Nazis to murder to Jews? Is it moral for gays to get beaten to death? Is it moral for sex trafficking? And if not why?
    1
  44. Michael 마익흘 Aronson moral to ur own logic? R u this ignorant? I’m asking these questions so u can explain ur logic to me which u keep dodging or just call me stupid for a way I choose to word things. Here I will be specific sense u can’t take a hint. Was it moral to u that the Nazis did the holocaust and why? There that should not be a hard question to understand or answer.
    1
  45. Michael 마익흘 Aronson yes it does. Calling it moral or immoral is one of the defining things to ensure it won’t happen again. Without morals justice doesn’t exist. Again whether or not u existed in it doesn’t matter. I’m trying to ask u, would u care if a holocaust was happening today. Say as an example for fun Trump decides to kill all transgenders and it is made legal. It won’t affect u, would u care if that happened?
    1
  46. Michael 마익흘 Aronson u don’t know how I feel about trumps decisions so don’t even go there. But see? If ur are against the trampling of human rights then would that not extend to a humans right to live? For a baby’s right to live?
    1
  47. Michael 마익흘 Aronson babies are human u know.
    1
  48. Michael 마익흘 Aronson also yes school shootings happen. It is immoral but can u imagine how much more it would happen if it was legal? Yes illegal and immoral things will occur. But again, the consequences of said shooting help keep many people from doing it. Now imagine what it would be like if shooting kids were perfectly legal.
    1
  49. Michael 마익흘 Aronson really how am I stupid? Because I disagree with u?
    1
  50. Michael 마익흘 Aronson a Fetus should have a right to live. Just as any human being that has not committed crime, who has not infringed on the lives of others. Again why does a Fetus have no rights? Or maybe more accurately, why should they not have any rights when they are human babies. Should a baby have no rights either then?
    1