Comments by "BVargas78" (@BVargas78) on "RE: NS is Socialism | Responding to your counterarguments and Further Explanation" video.

  1. Kaiser has a point though, mosser 1989. In 19th century conservatives tended to be protectionist/mercantilist with a state/private partnership, when it came to economics. Like we see with East India Company. It was the liberals not the conservatives that were in favour of the free markets and less regulation. Nowadays we call them 'classical liberals' because they combined laissez faire with more socially liberal (for the time) ideals also. On a side note, i like TIKs military videos but he has dropped the ball here. I'm not trying to come off as a socialist or national socialist apologist here, i'm not in favour of either. He's just wrong on some pretty basic things like what I just mentioned. It's almost like he's an expert on war, logistics and tactics but a bit of a newbie when it comes to social and economic history/concepts.
    31
  2. @mosser 1989 I understand your argument that their positions kind of switched, or at least changed over time. But i'm pretty sure TIK was referring to 19th century at the time and not the 20th century. Go to timestamp 0:55 he clearly says 'in the 1800's' when talking about those two trains of thought. A school-boy error!
    3