Comments by "BVargas78" (@BVargas78) on "Hitler's Socialism: The Evidence is Overwhelming" video.

There is a big ideological difference between the socialists of the right (such as fascists and nazis) and the socialists of the left (Marxists and the other left/progressives) other than just being internationalist or nationalist. Nazi's and fascists believe it is just and good that there is a hierarchy where the strong take their rightul positions at the top. The weak and unproductive, should be grateful to get anything more than contempt, because it reflects the natural order. While the Marxist left believes in equalizing hierarchy, if there is a natural order to reality, then we will change it. As a consequence of this, a Marxist may seek to strengthen the position of the weak to the detriment of the strong. And a fascist or nazi cannot stand such an affront to their sensibilities. While a Marxist sees the often traditional and conservative hierarchy of power as an affront to their sensibilities. Which is why we hear 'smash the patriarchy' type rhetoric from feminists and modern left so often these days. So while in practice, the dictatorships of the marxist left and the dictatorships of the authoritarian far right can seem similar (strong central control, 'do as i say or else' approach to governing etc, they are very different in in their philosophical outlook and values, which places them at opposite sides pretty much. Which is why i do not prescribe to the viewpoint of seeing them as part of the same team (aka socialists).
2
@RazvanMihaeanu But there is more to it than being internationalist or not, or even racially focused or not. At it's most rudimentary, the difference in outlook is that one group believes in a natural order, and see's it as a good and virtuous thing. The strong get their position at the top, the weak gets their position at the bottom, or is done away with if seen as useless or a burden. The other group seeks to do away with that or turn it on it's head even, normally by putting a burden on the strong, to the benefit of the weak, until it's done away with and theoretically balances itself out. Now i'm not saying I subscribe to one of these views or the other, my point is that they are very much at loggerheads, they are opposing views. Even if they may borrow some similar tactics and methods to achieve their ends.
2