Comments by "Ernst Wiltmann" (@ernstwiltmann6) on "Why they don't tell you about Hitler's "Shrinking Markets" problem" video.

  1. From Super accurate to Super biased, a filthy downfall.
    66
  2.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  No, I am actually a retired businessman from Germany, enjoying retirement in Canada on the beautiful Georgian Bay, to profile me as such, you failed.
    23
  3. TIK Your Quote """""History isn’t as boring as some people think, and my goal is to get people talking about it. """" Perfect, than get ready to be challenged.
    11
  4.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  From filth to filth, I can feel your love bro.
    7
  5. TIK Your Quote """"" I have a 2:1 Degree in History and a passion for early 20th Century conflicts (mainly WW2). I’m therefore approaching this like I would an academic essay. """" You may claim to be God's most educated gift to us earthlings, the canvas here is patient.
    6
  6.  @TheImperatorKnight  I doubt that you have studied Marxism, to be qualified for such a polarizing statement, using neo liberal think tanks do not make you an expert. If you want to do a good research, you can not ignore the findings of Richard David Precht. I take you read German ?
    3
  7. TIK Your Quote """"" I also want to dispel the myths and distortions that ruin our perception of the past by asking a simple question - “But is this really the case?”.""" Fantastic, I will hold you to it.
    3
  8.  @dawidkiller  The Artificial Intelligence of the future will develop a very different dynamic. Sorry to bust your bubble.
    2
  9. The issue is not "shrinking markets" The AI will teach you, that it will be all about "Shrinking Labor" .
    2
  10. Mark Twain had a saying about statistics: "There are lies, damned lies, and than there are statistics" I wish you a restful night.
    2
  11. TIK """"Henry Hazlitt's```` - in defense of market economy and liberalism" I can see him ad odds with John Maynard Keynes, in which he does not properly address arguments made by Keynesians. A reason why you like to paint Keynes as more socialistic inclined, which he was truly not. However, he gained the praise of Milton Friedman and Mark Spitznagel. The very people who are responsible for the economic chaos we endure today. The assumptions to controlling money supply and increasing it annually by 3% , buying toxic debts thus keeping Banks liquid went way out of control, and the Banks did not even trust each other, never mind using that money for lenders as intended.The opposite happened Asset prices have dropped. Banks Bad Debts are now stealing money from the middle class by devaluating it, creating a system that will hold us the money savers accountable for the failed economic policies of liberal ideals. The liberal economic failures are also based, of misrepresenting and misjudging the history, in our case the economics of Hitler`s Germany. I recommend Noam Chomsky https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72ntkmdF9Yk, also Dirk Müller (Mr Dax) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZz6j_WogwA Max Keiser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiuflBduorI
    2
  12.  @TheImperatorKnight  There is no socialist shrinking markets problem, only of a labor force, replaced by Artificial Intelligence. I trust you read German language books, so I would like to introduce you to Richard David Precht https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqcGe1wa-G4 The future will render any historical social model as philosophical elements. Emotional connections to any ideological movements as sentimental. An unconditional basic income for everyone as the only logical solution, to avoid gated (rich) communities, with benefits for the very few. A basic unconditional income for everyone will liberate humanity from redundant labor, and free the full potential of humanity's creativity.
    2
  13. TIK Your Quote """"""Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.""""" Your asserted conclusion tells me. that you have not.
    2
  14. I never read Keynes.
    1
  15. His opinion, or the real facts ?
    1
  16.  @Ph33NIXx  How do you separate that ?
    1
  17. “Personally, I don't apply any religious litmus test to whether a person ought to call himself Jewish -- it's far too complicated and ultimately too personal a question. I do take exception, however, to people who wouldn't know a ta sh'm'a from a t'yubta pretending to tell someone like me -- who as an adult turned my life upside down and spent nearly a year in a special yeshiva in order to fit myself for life as a religious Jew (and whose son is studying for ordination as an Orthodox rabbi) -- that I'm not really a Jew because I won't lie for Israel, and because I resent having the name of my religion used as a cover for organized crime. I have no difficulty articulating what being Jewish means to me. But I won't waste time doing it for these epigones. Their own standards deprive them of any right to inquire into the question. If what qualifies a person as "Jewish" is his readiness to lick the boots of the IDF and to parrot the lies of a militaristic apartheid regime, as they seem to insist, why should anyone give a damn about whether so-and-so is Jewish or not? Why would anyone want to be? Which brings me to the real point. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be drawn into this absurd show trial about whether we're "really" Jews. The professional frauds demanding this of us could not survive the application of a similar test to themselves -- and they know it. The "real Jew" bitching is a fake issue raised to support an indefensible breach of journalistic ethics. In my opinion, it's the breach we should focus on, not the nattering about it by the usual clique of liars and sycophants. https://www.facebook.com/notes/lena-bloch/michael-lesher-on-right-and-wrong-jews/10220266870481117/
    1
  18. How about Artificial Intelligence replacing labor ? I believe in the real issue is a "shrinking labor" force.
    1
  19. Luka Kobal You don't have to go that far any more, the USA will do just fine in the socialism department, with their socialism model for the Rich 1 %.
    1
  20. Kaya Elicin Is that a request for facts or for more junk opinions ?
    1
  21. Boring
    1
  22.  @TheMailrouter  hahah, he triggered you.
    1
  23. I checked some of the sources, where is the substance, I could not find it, perhaps you can help me out ?
    1
  24. TIK Your Quote """"This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.""""" Good, than You can start answering me some questions .
    1
  25. If you really want to know more about the nature of NAZI Germany, ask us Germans who experienced it, not somebody who has a weird notion about it.
    1
  26.  @adamwaugh3373  Only when he draws the conclusions of Hitler and Goebbels, and than, it is a very sinister notion.
    1
  27. You meant AIPAC ?
    1
  28. Only if you live in an alternative reality.
    1
  29. Naa, he has corporate think tanks, doing the thinking for him.
    1
  30.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  Are you a bot ?
    1
  31.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  Hahah, now I'm grasping the essence of the Muller report.
    1
  32.  @matthewboyd4066  Perhaps try your own medicine: " If your only counter is sarcasm ...."
    1
  33. Hitlers Germany was a socialist experiment ?
    1
  34. TIK Your Quote """""Can’t wait to get put on “Bad History” again on Reddit to be ‘refuted’ by an inter-Nazi using two sources, one of which is Wikipedia… or to be told to “read a book” by other Nazis... """" I have debated NAZI's and right to far right wingers long before you, I'm 65 with a wealth of political and historical memories. To put it mildly, with a different set of drawn conclusions.
    1
  35. Where is the substance you referring to ?
    1
  36. Where does the FIAT money fit in, into your assertion ?
    1
  37.  @dickiller2199  Is that the road map plan of Karl Marx ?, I doubt that.
    1
  38. The best strategy is when it comes to reading books, find the ones that enrich you.
    1
  39. Please define what you understand about Socialism.
    1
  40. What ?
    1
  41.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  Because he fucked up your universe ?
    1
  42. He sure is doing a great job, polarizing us.
    1
  43. If you find the comments are crazy, I grant some are, why don't you just rebuttal them, instead of displaying "vorauseilenden gehorsam", because you like what the author states ? The globe is in deep trouble, and you are in a deep coma.
    1
  44.  @TheImperatorKnight  Why did you not bother to read Mark Spoerer's and Adam Tooze's rebuttal of Goetz Ali's assertions, that pretty much dismantled your thesis. It seems that you hinge most of your idea on it. So can we now debate about Tooze and Spoerer, so I can demonstrate to you, in what predicament you got yourself into ? https://www.hsozkult.de/publicationreview/id/rezbuecher-6430 https://adamtooze.com/app/uploads/2017/01/Einfach-verkalkuliert-taz.pdf Fazit: Goetz Aly could not back up his assertions. For people who not read German, please use Google Translate, to read those links I posted.
    1
  45. TIK Your Quote """This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. """" That what you used to do in your WW2 vid's. I wonder now, has your account been hacked by AIPAC
    1
  46. Was capitalism not replaced by monopolism and FIAT money ?
    1
  47.  @TheImperatorKnight  Why did Jesus kick out the merchants from the temple ? Do you despise Jesus too ?
    1
  48. TIK Your Quote """""Aly, G. “Hitler’s Beneficiaries: How the Nazis Bought the German People.” Verso, 2016. (Original German 2005). """"""" #2 "But calculated wrong - because thought wrong Hitler's regime has bought the loyalty of Germans by bringing Jews and conquered lands plundered? Götz Aly defended this thesis yesterday. Wrong, as our author Adam Tooze shows" My criticism of Götz Aly's book "Hitler's People's State" is clear: he has was grossly underestimated for the Germans because he exclusively owned the Taxes and the services financed through bonds. which does not count as war costs. Aly fails in his yesterday's review plik (taz, 15. 3. 05) the central meaning of this question. What my criticism is about is not, as he puts it, the book-keeping question how spending and revenue are allocated. What it is is the classic economic question: how are the costs of Wars and social benefits? To be clear: Aly is wrong - because he thinks wrong. He believes Obviously, government loans just become a burden if you can she has to pay back. This is evident from his replica, which states "The loans taken up for the war on the German capital market" "Delayed" the real burden on the German population with the aim of to impose these debts on enslaved peoples as soon as possible ". The Thus, according to Aly, receiving the loan itself did not mean any for the Germans "Real encumbrance", first the eradication, which then devolves on the occupied territories. should be rolled. This thought, however, that with credit the burdens of war "Delaying" is Aly's fundamental error of reasoning. Let's leave Hitler's fi- Finance Minister Schwerin von Krosigk, who, as Aly knows, quite on the amount of discussion was: "The often argued argument that at present the tax, at Debt the future bears the burden is wrong. The goods needs of the fighting the army can only from accumulated supplies (of the past) or newly produced goods (the present) are satisfied. The load can not be shifted to the future. " Alys assumption that the "real burden" of the German population could be "Delay", not even shared by Krosigk. At full employment, the latest since 1938 in Germany, every additional state no matter how funded, it can be used directly at the expense of the private sector ty. In the popular jargon of economists, that means "dislocation". "or crowding out https://adamtooze.com/app/uploads/2017/01/Doch-falsch-gerechnet-%E2%80%93-weil-falsch-gedacht-taz.pdf
    1
  49. "The idea of revolution was born in ww1" , No it was born during the Paris Commune. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Commune
    1
  50.  @TheImperatorKnight  You still owe us an explanation, what you did felt like a betrayal to your fans.
    1
  51. @Adam Beasley I have to watch the vid again, and I should have mentioned the content, I was not in agreement with, certainly I was upset about it. It might have been the Neo-liberal approach of TIK by using the broad brush off "Socialism/Communism = Nazi fascism" phrase. This was a year ago, and at my age, memory is an exercise I have to keep up with. It was probably a single issue related to it.
    1
  52. @Adam Beasley at 2:55 "Shrinking markets problem only effects socialist countries, not capitalist ones" Are you familiar with George Gammon ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-ifzjfGTkM&t=1043s
    1
  53. The only purpose for Hitler to utilize the Hitler Youth use, was to make up for the non existing military reserve. Since the Versailles treaty, Germany was only allowed a Wehrmacht military of 100 000 men, and no conscripts. So the Hitler Youth was trained in most basic para military disciplines . For example, pilots for the future airforce where trained like military pilots in Glider schools.That's where my Dad was trained. To spin other purposes to it, is cheap.
    1
  54.  @matthewboyd4066  Perhaps he is, this is not about ones vanity.
    1
  55. I see, you like articles that shield you from reality, that is all you are basically admitting ?
    1
  56.  @CondorCalabasas  Thoughts are cheap, try again.
    1
  57. TIK Your Quote """"" I’m therefore approaching this like I would an academic essay. Lots of sources, quotes, references and so on. Only the truth will do. #history """" Let's see how much truth you may absorb.
    1
  58.  @infidelheretic923  For the sheeple, thinking is hard work. Are we looking forward to AI to free us from this labor ?
    1
  59.  @fromthebackseat4865  I sure hope he is gonna study that topic. Anyway, It still leaves space to interpret.
    1
  60.  CAVKING19DELTA TEXAS  You are allowed to contribute a substantial rebuttal, perhaps you should try that approach.
    1
  61. TIK Your Quote """""Aly, G. “Hitler’s Beneficiaries: How the Nazis Bought the German People.” Verso, 2016. (Original German 2005). """"""" Please tell me more about it, I have been a participant of the late 60 and early 70's German Student scene a little bit like Ali G. His book ( " Unser Kampf. 1968 – Ein irritierter Blick zurück") now is a favorite read for Pegida and the far Right AFD political spectrum, a movement that is not alien to blatant racism and hate speech) Are you a soulmate of Björn Höcke ? " In a 2014 email to party colleagues, Höcke advocated the abolition of sections 86 and 130 of the German Criminal Code. Section 86 prohibits the spread of propaganda by unconstitutional organizations. Section 130 criminalizes "incitement of hatred towards other groups of the population" (Volksverhetzung).[16] "Ethical unsound persuasions" cannot be "avoided by legal measures". Going back to Aly G , he would have been somewhat credible when he asserted that the Nazi Welfare State was paid for (((((in large part ))))) by confiscation of Jewish property in Germany, if he would have used the sentence ((((in some part)))) instead. Our fellow Jewish German compatriots where in large part not at all that rich. In demographics they did do just as well as other Germans, give or take 5% error margins . Manny where intermarried with Germans that dealt with their family in a spectrum of civilivility to barbarism with the favorite: choosing opportunity . When it comes down to it, sometimes out of fear and shame.
    1
  62. I detect some serious problems with this version. I do not believe the Q & A has a realistic application, do not underestimate the intelligence of the "categorized".
    1
  63. There is no socialist shrinking markets problem, only of a labor force, replaced by Artificial Intelligence. I trust you read German language books, so I would like to introduce you to Richard David Precht https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqcGe1wa-G4 The future will render any historical social model as philosophical elements. Emotional connections to any ideological movements as sentimental. An unconditional basic income for everyone as the only logical solution, to avoid gated (rich) communities, with benefits for the very few. A basic unconditional income for everyone will liberate humanity from redundant labor, and free the full potential of humanity's creativity.
    1