Comments by "Ernst Wiltmann" (@ernstwiltmann6) on "Karl Marx's Anti-Semitism" video.
-
9
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheMoonIsAConspiracyTheory Appendix : Immigrated to Canada in 1982, I'm a Canadian now, I hate the non de- nazified German mindset the western allies left us with, after WW2, my Grandfather, a Wehrmacht intel Officer was charged by NKWD for scorched earth war crimes committed in Belarus 1943/44. Danish Intel, MI6, OSS (later CIA) let him get away with it, because he was willing to share his work with western intel, serving in the emerging Cold War. That material was used by many western historians, so most of the western literature sails on Reinhard Gehlens Fremde Heere Ost, sources. It's a weird feeling, when you get clobbered and arrested in political student demonstrations, by the same cops, that deported Jews to Ausschwitz 25 years earlier. I said nasty things about them, but I would not label it anti German.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@daveharrison4697 You might also say they pretended to be Communist's, like the Templar Knights, the Holy Inquisition, the Witchfinder General's , Witch Hammers, Conquistadors and what not, pretended to be Christians, and both Philosophy and Christianity have not reached their end in History. It is what we make out of them, would you not agree. Philosophy is an accepted science in social modelling , Religion an evolutionary process going either way, north or south. South is where our current Corporate Neo Liberalism is taking us right now, can it survive, and what will come after, I do not know, do you ? It comes down to how much faith do you have in humanity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gagamba9198 Your quote : ## ' If you want to know something about a subject you talk to a person involved with that subject and read the various relevant texts.' Name them. How do you know that TIK hasn't read them? If anything, TIK certain states his sources.## ................................... The sources on the subject are fast, and should not authorize amateurs to be elevated experts. TIK is the Expert on WW2, he's not an expert when History and Philosophy collude, to take on Philosophy. If you have a serious genuine interest in Philosophy, you should not consult amateurs, you dig into the experts. I used strong words on you, because i need to take you out of your comfort zone when you resort to the wrong remedy's , like a Doctor would communicate to his patient. So are you ready to take on Philosophy, with me or Katarina , or you want to stick to your ad hominm approach ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jetstom Winston Your quote: ## Nazi skinheads like you ## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, You seem have a problem with assumptions, how did you jump to that conclusion ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gagamba9198 Your quote ## the copy and paste job ## ..................................................... A have a few dogs barking at a stature, one is called Gary North , and a howling choir conductor with the name of Yuri N Maltsev. Dogs should not impress you, since the history of philosophy will not be written until we have evolutionary evolved. there was no evolutionary social behavior change for more than 10 000 years and probably way beyond the Neolithic period. If you are able to separate the corn from the chaff on youtube, it is in your hands to find better information. I recommend Richard David Precht, I hope you do not mind my copy and paste job from Wikipedia: ....................................................................................................................................................."
Originally planned as an introduction to philosophy for young people, his most successful work, the non-fiction Wer bin ich – und wenn ja, wie viele? (English: "Who am I – and if So, how many?"; release of the English version in April 2011) was published in 2007. It is an introduction to philosophy linking the results of brain research, psychology, behaviour research and other sciences. The book is structured according to Kant's classification: What can I know? What ought I to do? What may I hope? After a recommendation by Elke Heidenreich, the book occupied first place in the Spiegel bestseller list. It sold over 1,000,000 copies and was translated into 32 languages. According to a non-fiction bestseller list by the German weekly Spiegel, it was the most successful hardcover non-fiction of the year 2008 and achieved third place in the bestseller of the decade.
In 2009, the non-fiction Liebe - ein unordentliches Gefühl links the scientific-biological view of sexuality and love with the psychological and social-cultural circumstances of our comprehension and behaviour in love. Precht's main thesis is that sexual love doesn't come from sexuality but from the parent-child relationship. The need for attachment and closeness comes from the childhood relationship to the parents and it later searches in the sexual partner an equivalent. Thus, love is a projection of (early-)childhood needs and experiences in love. From March 2009 to December 2009 it was on the Spiegel bestseller list.
The non-fiction Die Kunst kein Egoist zu sein was published in 2010. The book is structured in three parts: "good and evil", "willing and doing" and "moral and society". Precht deals with the question of moral at first (philosophical and evolutionary) and comes to the conclusion that humans have a relatively high need to be in tune with themselves and also to consider themselves well. In the second moral-psychological part however, he examines numerous strategies by which people trick themselves by repressing, replacing, comparing or feeling not to be responsible. In the third part, he reflects about consequences for our present society. He criticizes the renunciation of politics to the regulatory policy in the economy, pleads for more civic commitment and for a transformation of democracy by new forms of citizen participation and co-partnership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1