Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Eastory" channel.

  1. Did you not read the title? 1919-1942 Try watching the next video
    1
  2. I was hoping to see a pornhub tab
    1
  3.  @PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi  lol No Germany lost their resources and industry to the west and their men to the east, the manpower losses were in 1941, they lost 40 total divisions, and their division’s combat readiness went from a military with a majority of forces suited for all operations to suited for defense operations, search “Road to Stalingrad” by military history visualized
    1
  4. Just imagine it took the Germans and Soviets over a million men to move through the zone, and the Ukrainians had only 60,000 men to work with
    1
  5.  @АндрейЕрмилов-х8п  arguably, but they had Russian armed forces supporting them too
    1
  6. “As they lost more than half of their army” what are you even on about? The Germans lost 20,000 men and had 112,000 wounded in the army, this was similar to the polish campaign, except Poland wasn’t a coalition of two of the world’s leading militaries with 3 other nations in support “delayed the attack on the UK” you wot there never could’ve been an attack on the UK, the navy was reduced to a shell in surface ships, not to mention the Germans assumed Britain would make peace after the French defeat, and didn’t have an invasion plan ready until mid summer 1940, and even then it was dogshit and ultimately scrapped
    1
  7.  @TheKenji2221  you mean the massive material boost when the BEF was effectively disarmed after their evacuation? Or the you know, entire nation’s resources they now had not only access but land access to? Yeah I know, but you still haven’t exactly clarified your asinine “half the army” statement
    1
  8.  @TheKenji2221  “they delayed for a year” the battle for Britain was in summer 1940, France fell proper on June 5th I think, what delay are you on about? The navy still would be unable to attack, the navy could not meet the army’s requirement of landing 23 divisions in the first wave And still, please explain this “half of the army” shit, 20,000 is a third of a minimum authorized strength for a German army
    1
  9.  @TheKenji2221  I’m going to stop replying until your dumbass actually explains this “half its army” statement You can’t because it’s not true in anyway but I’ll wait Also the attack still happened less than a month later, so you’re still wrong, you have nothing except non sequiturs
    1
  10.  @TheKenji2221  also you’re wrong again the OKW considered operation Seelowe to be child’s play however air superiority over south England was a requirement from Hitler so phase 1 was the air battle, I have more than a brain cell I have the actual historical events, you have...fantasy, at best
    1
  11.  @TheKenji2221  translation: “I’ve been called out specifically on my stupidity and ignore reality, to avoid further embarrassment I’m going to proclaim victory and flee”
    1
  12.  @TheKenji2221  all I asked was an explanation of a statement you made Then I would’ve asked for a source, got neither except a source that proves you wrong
    1
  13. Fool I have no way to do it
    1
  14.  Matt allen  seems like a great way to get aids
    1
  15.  @bigfattank101  I never even get to the second line
    1
  16. Paradox has a marketing department?
    1
  17. It wasn’t the Canadians, it was Ike who decided this “Stimson was poised to race for Berlin, but Eisenhower stopped him...Eisenhower ordered Montgomery(‘s) 21st army group north to cut off Denmark from the Soviets” I’ll edit in the link to the video that mentions this quote from...someone I forget https://youtu.be/6hyultx5eVU enjoy
    1
  18. ‘Tanks?’
    1
  19. Approximately 14,000 for every German Corps and 10,000(?) for every Soviet Army in 1942, that’s assuming they were full strength, which wasn’t the case many times for the infantry (Rifle Corps) or any German unit
    1
  20.  Abu Troll al cockroachistan  I don’t remember the full quote but a historian (Glantz? Hill?) says this “Had army group center launched Operation Typhoon in August, they would be against soviet defenders who did not waste their manpower in fruitless counterattacks, while pushing an ever expanding corridor with hundreds of thousands of enemy soldiers threatening its flanks, and would approach ‘the gates’ of Moscow around the time the muddy season begins, slowing the logistics down to a crawl during what would be the heaviest fighting” And no they couldn’t send what they had south, they needed everything they had north to prevent the Soviets from reinforcing and resupplying the Caucasus, that’s why cutting the Volga and Don were so important
    1
  21. If Russians aren’t losing they wouldn’t be begging since…a long time for a ceasefire to reconstitute their forces
    1
  22. Read a history book, it was the entry of America that changed the outcome of the war, as the French knew they could demand harsher terms, that the british knew the war must end quickly before the Americans seize more influence, and the Germans knew they couldn’t hold out against all three of the powers Forgot the name of the book but it does exist, sorry I forgot
    1
  23. Entire nation’s armed forces would be lost in such a case, like the baltics
    1
  24. @ends1eg uh, what army do you work for where that’s the case? US divisions are around 20,000 men each
    1
  25. What copium from a fucking infographic that shows high losses for their side Shills man, shills everywhere
    1
  26. ultimateroblocksgawd and they were smashed by the Army Group South and ultimately yeeted in Kiev only with the armored forces of army group center, imagine the difference swapping the two around would’ve made in terms of securing the caucuses before fuel hit a critical point and before the serious manpower issues, the assault on the Caucasus in our timeline were hinged upon the idea the Soviets wouldn’t retreat as they did in 1941, but they didn’t, they fell back before being encircled and throwing the German plan into disarray I’m under the significant belief that if Hitler had his way (the offensive focus being on the northern and southern sectors to deny the red army the ability to replenish forces, instead of the center, or even just the southern sector) instead of Halder then the war would look very different, the Soviets especially would’ve found it much harder to hold out if they even could
    1
  27. ultimateroblocksgawd I never said that, I compared the importance of the Middle East before and after the discovery of its vast oil, of Siberia’s resources weren’t known or tapped yet then they aren’t relevant
    1
  28. ultimateroblocksgawd I do not understand what this is referring to, is it the Soviets? Well yeah, that’s what the Germans would want the ahistoric army group south to conquer with their large size, since that’s what germany needed to continue waging war If it’s the Germans then this is just flat out wrong
    1
  29. Oh, you should see the siege of Toulon, Napoleon Bonaparte was almost killed by a random British sergeant
    1
  30.  @tricksnotreats7277  lol
    1
  31.  Scott McConnell  more so the western food supplies, and weapons, and fuel But pretty much
    1
  32. I thought you said in Q/A that you couldn’t find good sources for the Great War?
    1
  33. CGP Grey would disagree
    1
  34. This didn’t age well
    1
  35. Don’t forget Syria
    1
  36.  @Hillbilly001  then I guess every historian in human history is full of shit, and of course the classic quote: “you cannot write history in the trenches.” Also no, third rate doesn’t mean militia, third rate means third rate, ie ‘of inferior or very poor quality.’ If you tell me barely trained men that lot of times came out of the admin companies and shit given infantry duties were not of inferior or poor quality as infantry (the most important part of the war on the ground in Vietnam) then you’re just denying reality at that point No, I’m not full of shit, hence the logic and citations, whereas you are just appealing to authority ‘they were there so they know everything’ I find it hard to believe a NCO from a war where it was standard practice to rotate after a year is familiar from DC-Firebase in every level in 1978 Sorry guy, that’s not an argument
    1
  37.  @Hillbilly001  what difference? What relevance is this entire comment? It’s literally the definition of an irrelevant anecdote
    1
  38.  @Hillbilly001  irrelevant
    1
  39. “Hello, this is my face” “Ahhhh, he has such a way with words…”
    1
  40.  @Eatmydbzballs  YouTube has an autotranslation if you didn’t know
    1
  41.  @Eatmydbzballs  I think it has to be seen outside the comment thread, ie you have to see it without tapping ‘view all replies’ it’s a bit lame but that doesnt mean he’s a bot necessarily
    1
  42. Hoax? The war just isn’t happening? You’re on bath salts
    1
  43. The lack of music scared me more
    1