Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Sea Lion: Why not just invade the UK in 1940?" video.

  1. Jimmy Geeraets I could almost decipher your comment, but it would be helpful if you tried spellcheck/autocorrect some time for us to get your point
    5
  2. Can’t wait for improved war gaming virtualization tech so we can actually watch it flounder to shut wehraboos up
    4
  3. More like superior resources win wars, then again ask the French how tactics only win battles
    4
  4. This isn’t entirely fair, in the magical scenario of no boats and no planes the Germans could just pick anywhere to invade and not necessarily southern England, besides total air domination would uh...suck for the civilians and be helpful with air supply Worthless hypothetical but still I don’t think saying that only 3 divisions could make it is even close to fair in this hypothetical
    2
  5. Because what could the british do to the Germans to reverse their gains? Nothing, the answer was nothing, they needed the US to actually resume offensive operations
    2
  6.  @kevinmason124  the Soviets didn’t provide Britain tanks guns etc
    2
  7. Except the Germans weren’t a fully mechanized army like the western allies so their fuel resources were much less than them, and tanks aren’t too useful in urban terrain which was most of southern England
    1
  8.  @talebdaas  if Germany forced the Uk to capitulate the USSR wouldn’t survive, since Germany could trade fuel from America You know, 70% of the worlds oil supply in the 40s
    1
  9. Bruh that’s how it worked for me in RUSE, I just made towed 88mm with a Wirbelwind and rekt the RAF
    1
  10.  G E T R E K T 905  underrated comment
    1
  11.  @kevinmason124  8/11 Germans were killed by the Soviets, I’m missing the relevancy though, the british couldn’t conduct offensive Ops without the Americans, the Soviets didn’t give them their fuel guns ammo logistics trucks tanks etc
    1
  12.  @kevinmason124  that makes no sense, the afrika korps didn’t have manpower diverted to the east
    1
  13.  @kevinmason124  forget Italy they were on the verge of losing Africa and oh yeah the supplies were Italian and came from Italy, the USSR didn’t do anything for that as the supply situation was planned until September
    1
  14.  @kevinmason124  we aren’t talking about Italy we’re talking about the British inability to go on the offensive, in Africa, years before they’d get to Italy
    1
  15.  @kevinmason124  these offensives were the entire subject of the conversation guy
    1
  16.  @kevinmason124  In short: no In long: no, no, no, no, and no Not even historians agree that Malta being taken would’ve changed the afrika korps fortunes
    1
  17.  @kevinmason124  Again, no, well, sorta, again they couldn’t do fucall without the Americans because that’s who fed armed and transported them
    1
  18.  @kevinmason124  No? The US aid wasn’t limited, it was mandatory, I don’t know why this is hard to accept or something
    1
  19.  @kevinmason124  thats what the subject of this entire thread was, you’re the one out of line not me
    1
  20. Daniel Craig more like sea supremacy
    1
  21. You don’t attack the most numerical force for the same reason you don’t rely on good infrastructure in a nation notorious for shit infrastructure*
    1
  22. “Don’t attack Russia in the winter” Paul Von Hindenburg: “what are you, a bitch?”
    1
  23.  @davidwilkins3781  if you’re stupid
    1