Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "What if the US stayed neutral in World War 2?" video.

  1. What if the comment section actually relied on facts and accredited history? We will never know
    39
  2.  @Gabriel-sdf  yeah because no one has ever made a historical inaccuracy like saying the Germans were only stopped in 1941 by the winter and not the red army hahaha I’ll have what you’re smoking please
    10
  3.  @fredbred1432  he asked for peace in five minutes of invasion?! XDDDDD he never asked for peace, well, let me rephrase that he never asked for peace in a way that has Germany continuing to exist
    5
  4. Bob semple had like a 7 man crew though
    3
  5. No, it’s because FDR publicly stated “all nations in south east Asia will be protected by America”
    2
  6. The opposite, we should’ve committed more to defending China We should’ve killed the communists ourselves
    2
  7. Doubtful
    1
  8. Lol, no
    1
  9. They could lose, starvation and malnutrition has a way of inciting unrest and revolt against a war, just ask the Germans in 1918, it would depend on the success (or lack thereof) of the alternate Uboat campaign, and of course, a hypothetical Japanese incursion into the Indian Ocean, cutting Persia off would be disastrous
    1
  10. Germany didn’t want Spain to join, Turkey wasn’t interested in any war ever, only declaring war in February 1945 so they wouldn’t be left out of the post war world
    1
  11.  @ulrichschnell2331  Ireland is always occupied during war time, so their choice is made for them, now if you want to add them fine but then it goes into fantasy rather than something more realistic to have a thought exercise about, granted everything is fantasy but still
    1
  12. That’s not true in the slightest lol
    1
  13.  @harrycao7935  Watch. The. Video. For the production numbers Then remember the US literally made a law that simplifies into “we give free shit to countries we want” and then gave the British most of it Most produced destroyer? American Cruiser? American Carrier? American Battleship? You guessed it, American So in a world without these things, which your video by the way didn’t account for because why would it? And looking at the numbers that are plainly in the video that you probably didn’t even watch anyway seemingly, the Japanese have a bigger navy, in a focused area Or in short: USA make British fleet big, Japanese fleet bigger than British fleet without USA I can’t shorten it anymore
    1
  14. Look at the historical activity on the Arctic convoys and the British Med presence, and you’ll find your answers
    1
  15.  @RouGeZH  ah so aid to Russia goes through where? And yeah, just give up the Mediterranean, the artery of Britain That’s silly
    1
  16.  @RouGeZH  okay so we know you don’t know anything about history, fantastic, in such cases just watch the video and enjoy
    1
  17. 70% of the worlds oil supply to Germany? Yeah gg ez
    1
  18. Atomic bombs wouldn’t win the war, and it wouldn’t be so fast without US scientists because they had theirs and all the top German scientists who were expelled for being Jewish
    1
  19.  @handhand212  it’s not that people are ‘fans’ of Nazi germany (of course there are the…let’s call them ‘deviants’ to be civil) it’s more the human nature of “they failed, so how could I have done better?” Mentality that we use to try not to repeat other’s mistakes, we don’t have to hypothesize how the United Nations could win world war 2, because they did We do have to hypothesize how the Axis powers could win world war 2, because they didn’t
    1
  20.  @someblackguy7371  WHY do you randomly CAPITALIZE words as if it DOES anything except make YOU look ridiculous?
    1
  21. And yet in the carrier duels the British lost to the Japanese, like during the ‘Indian Ocean raid’ historically, to the point Admiral Somerville dipped out of the Indian Ocean entirely
    1
  22.  @ricardosmythe2548  repulse and prince of Wales were old ships? Lol And Um…the Japanese still built more stuff and had higher quality stuff on average, you’re not going to be so stupid as to say the Zero and Val were inferior to the fucking Swordfish or something are you?
    1
  23.  @ricardosmythe2548  oh right uh, Persia and India were the economic hearts of the empire, so the Indian Ocean was very necessary, ie why the Med was necessary, the Med serves little point beyond trade with them, as Persia had the oil (until america gave free oil away) and India had all them tasty taxes
    1
  24.  @ricardosmythe2548  Well, no they couldn’t and no they couldn’t, again did you watch the video Let’s just stick with carriers the cock of the walk of navies, the Japanese made 26, the English 16, the stupid fleet size video you’re referencing probably includes all the free shit america gave (hint there’s a reason american ships hold the title of ‘most numerous ship ever made in class’), and what’s the point of the Med without India or Persia? Do you think before you talk? It’s called “The Artery of the British Empire” because Persia and India trade go through it Like, I’m missing your confusion
    1
  25. Are you stupid? He literally showed the British Vs Japanese naval production, and the Japanese had the better naval aviation
    1
  26. Not applicable, it was only after the invasion of Russia and the whole genocide thing was the evil of Germany seen, the Soviets were still seen as the biggest threat to the universe
    1