Comments by "The Looinrims" (@looinrims) on "Would the US military need help from allies to crush China?" video.

  1. Not exactly, China doesn’t exactly possess the nukes required to flatten everything necessary for that, none of China’s neighbors would be okay being next to the guys who just used nukes in warfare for the second time in all of history
    10
  2. It is an invasion please send help -all delivery personnel
    9
  3.  @insertsomethingfuni2617  something many forget is China is in a similar position
    6
  4.  @lindajones7219  based on what?
    6
  5.  @chadchan1316  lol what? The Chinese with millions of soldiers overwhelmed a coalition force in its overextended state, wow, such action, much military strength, ignore how they couldn’t kick coalition forces back into the sea, all it takes is one solid foothold
    4
  6. Such power…never before have i felt such tremendous strength…never!
    4
  7.  @Jin-gu8sz  the only case in a sino American exclusive nuclear exchange is america gets crippled at best flattened (in all urban areas) at worst and China gets glassed off the planet, how the atmosphere would react to all that is impossible to know for sure considering the lack of reference but it is safe to assume south east Asia and North America would be pretty fucked, Europe Africa South America and western Russia though should be mostly okay, and considering that one of the worlds breadbaskets would survive (Eastern Europe, Ukraine) the survivors could survive the state of the world although the death of both of the largest global economies would be uh hard to acclimate to I assume especially for the soyboy Western Europeans, but that’s just speculation, however I do believe Russia could/would seize the initiative and just invade Europe with its western districts
    4
  8.  @pky1146  lol
    3
  9.  @James-pt7yh  China is a nation notorious for civil wars and collapse, I would find it hard to believe the million and a half (or whatever) man army would be willing fight entirely, certainly a majority over a million strong but not all
    2
  10. @m_hicks12 that’s not necessarily true he could simply just be misinformed, like wehraboos (PLAaboos?)
    1
  11. “No nukes modeled!”
    1
  12. No
    1
  13. No, it’s never fight a half assed war You can fight a anything, anywhere, except land wars in the ocean and naval wars on land, if you have enough conviction and resources (and not retarded people in charge)
    1
  14. So america laid claim to territory beyond established borders and militarizes patches of rocks into full fledged bases? Oh fuck did I just destroy another retarded “but muh America crime!”? Yeah, I did
    1
  15.  @ryanthackston3439  they didn’t that’s my point, that’s what China did (or is doing)
    1
  16. Ask the Ukrainians about their desires to surrender because missiles History shows strategic bombing doesn’t make people surrender, the opposite happens, it hardens resistance
    1
  17.  @Impulse154  it took nuclear weapons And oh yeah the Japanese military still wanted to fight on after nuke number 2 https://youtu.be/U0kII5dUXKg
    1
  18.  @Impulse154  but go on with your ‘exception equals the rule’ logical fallacy, here let me provide 3 counters for every 1 you make Guernica Berlin London
    1
  19. That’s not necessarily true if russia and Pakistan let land routes work, and the Chinese navy isn’t anything to sneeze at, I point to Military History Visualized PLA navy video
    1
  20.  @kimeli  Koreans were in Vietnam during that war, and that was far less relevant to the South
    1
  21. They just finished a decade long conflict with Japan and civil war, with soviet surplus equipment, not poor in the slightest, and without full support of the home front There’s a lot different between 1950s and today
    1
  22. Sorry what engagement did the taliban win against us forces? I remember the Afghanistan withdrawal as the US leaving and the ANA collapsing, because that’s what happened
    1
  23. No shit, Look at video upload date
    1
  24. There are no missiles from space and drones are tactical at best? This comment uses Call of Duty logic
    1
  25.  @samuelmcbride  EMPs aren’t missiles, ICBMs aren’t space based Learn to read first before trying to talk about military affairs and assets, just shut up and enjoy the video by the guy who knows more about this stuff than you know about your own butthole
    1
  26. No they didn’t
    1
  27.  @Laët305  america has Japan and South Korea It’ll be a lotta slow singing and flower bringing
    1
  28. Russia I’m sure would be very polite enough to allow trade overland for China
    1
  29. You naive donut there are groups that believe in ethnic cleansing of entire races, humanity is forged by war it’s what we do
    1
  30. Good luck
    1
  31. How would they just take port cities without getting ripped to shreds by tens if not hundreds of thousands of well supported ground forces? This isn’t the 1800s with the opium wars of steam and iron vs wooden boats and guns vs spears
    1
  32. Taliban doesn’t have a nation to defend, Soviets were unable to crush al quada, were they helpless against NATO? China? whoever?
    1
  33.  @bobbob8866  oh no it’s another “muh military industrial complex” idiot
    1
  34. How so? This is a visualized simplified version of what the people with shiny bits on their uniforms talk about in the dark rooms
    1
  35.  @codywolf6336  exactly it’s inevitable China and USA would go to war what’s your point?
    1
  36.  @codywolf6336  is that why russia and China met in China to discuss defense strategy ?
    1
  37. Did…did you just say the chance of victory is remote in the open ocean?! XD What a joke, just watch the videos of China vs America under a variety of circumstances, they won’t get invaded, but a massive bombing offensive is enough to dick kick China, as their industry is coastal based
    1
  38. That wasn’t a total war against China? Whereas China did wage total war? Did you even look at the history?
    1
  39.  @anpan4318  so… 1.3 million fighting Chinese men wasn’t a Chinese war? Next you’ll say vietnam wasn’t a Chinese war, too bad Beijing doesn’t agree with you
    1
  40.  @anpan4318  I don’t ‘assume’, I do know better because I know the facts
    1
  41. No
    1
  42.  @Zoran675  that’s not how nuclear war works Number one target isn’t population centers go watch nuclear showdown video by Binkov Battlegrounds
    1